eMedicine Specialties > Obstetrics and Gynecology > General Gynecology

Elective Abortion

Author: Suzanne R Trupin, MD, Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois College of Medicine-Champaign; CEO and Owner, Women's Health Practice; CEO and Owner, Hada Cosmetic Medicine and Midwest Surgical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Nov 16, 2009

Introduction

Background

Elective termination of pregnancy remains common in the United States and worldwide. Accurate statistics have been kept since the enactment of the 1973 US Supreme Court decisions legalizing abortions.

  • Since the 1973 decision, approximately 1.3-1.4 million abortions have been performed annually in the United States.
  • Abortion is one of the most common medical procedures performed in the United States each year.
  • Medical termination of pregnancy with mifepristone was approved in the United States in 2000 and is used in 31 countries worldwide. Approximately half of all abortions are performed with this method.
  • More than 40% of all women will end a pregnancy by abortion at some time in their reproductive lives. Based on estimated lifetime risk, each American woman is expected to have 3.2 pregnancies, of which 2 will be a live birth, 0.7 will be an induced abortion, and 0.5 will be a miscarriage. Using 1996 data, this translates into 3.89 million live births, 1.37 million abortions, and 0.98 million miscarriages.
  • Worldwide, some 20-30 million legal abortions are performed annually, with another 10-20 million abortions performed illegally (see The Alan Guttmacher Institute). Illegal abortions are unsafe and account for 13% of all maternal mortality and serious complications. Death from abortion is almost unknown in the United States or in other countries where abortion is legally available.
  • Statistic reporting in the United States is from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC, http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/Data_Stats/Abortion.htm). The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI) is a private organization that is not subject to the reporting limitations of state health departments. AGI contacts abortion providers directly and provides abortion data every 4-5 years. A previous report documented a discrepancy of approximately 12% between statistical figures presented by the CDC compared with those of AGI (the latter generally having higher estimates).
  • In spite of the introduction of newer, more effective, and more widely available contraceptive methods, more than half of the 6 million pregnancies occurring each year in the United States are considered unplanned by the women who are pregnant. Of these pregnancies, approximately half end in elective terminations.
  • Each year in the United States, almost 3% of all reproductive-aged women terminate their pregnancies. While women of every social class seek terminations, the typical woman who terminates her pregnancy is young, white, unmarried, and poor.

Legalization of Abortion

Termination of pregnancy has been practiced since ancient times and by all cultures. The indications and social context for termination of pregnancy vary with culture and time.

The use of abortion to preserve the life of the mother has been widely accepted. Early Jewish scholars' interpretation of the Talmud required that the fetus be destroyed if it posed a threat to the mother during delivery. The ancient Greeks allowed abortion under certain circumstances. The ancient Romans did not consider a fetus a person until after birth, and abortion was practiced widely. Early Christians had varying practices regarding abortion. By 1869, the Catholic church declared abortion a sin punishable by excommunication.

Before the 19th century, most US states had no specific abortion laws. Women were able to end a pregnancy prior to viability with the assistance of some medical personnel.

Since the landmark 1973 US Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, hundreds of laws, federal and state, have been proposed or passed, making this the most actively litigated and highly publicized area in the field of medicine. Many of these laws are enjoined by court order and are thus not enforceable. They span a variety of controversial rulings, including provisions to establish viability before termination, parental or spousal notification, mandatory waiting periods, mandatory wording for counseling sessions, denial of public funding, denial of public funds for counseling (gag orders), targeted regulations specific to abortion providers, and provisions against specific abortion techniques.

Laws in several states mandate the examination of fetal tissue removed at the time of surgical abortion; how these laws will apply to medical abortions remains unclear. Because virtually all the laws regulating abortions were written before the legalization of medical abortions, some of these laws, such as the fetal tissue examination statutes, may be non sequiturs. Laws in some states criminalize these procedures, and performing a specific abortion constitutes a felony offense by the provider. Thirty-one states have forced parental consent or notification. Nine state courts block these laws. Thirty-one states ban abortion coverage for low-income women, and 19 states pay for abortion for low-income women.

Abortion politics even compromise access to emergency contraception thought to block implantation of a fertilized egg. Laws may be needed to protect victims of sexual assault. A pending bill in Maryland proposes that hospitals provide emergency contraception to all rape victims who seek treatment. However, the Maryland legislature adjourned in April of 2002 without passing this bill.

In the context of international laws, restrictive regulations and laws do more to increase the morbidity and mortality associated with abortions and do not present alternatives to obtaining abortions. In states where the laws are very restrictive, a trend exists toward delaying abortion procedures until later gestational ages, which makes access to care harder to achieve and actually increases medical risk unnecessarily.

Before Roe v Wade

Before the 19th century, most US states had no specific abortion laws. The provisions of British common law took precedence, and women had the right to terminate a pregnancy prior to viability. The first antiabortion legislation appeared in the 1820s; the preservation of pregnant women's health was the motivating force. Beginning with a Connecticut statute and followed by an 1829 New York law, the next 20 years saw the enactment of a series of laws restricting abortion, punishing providers, and, in some cases, punishing the woman who was seeking the abortion. During this time, the mortality rate from abortion was high, while the mortality rate from childbirth was less than 3%. By 1900, abortion in the United States at any time during pregnancy was a crime, with the exception of therapeutic abortion performed to save the mother's life.

The first US federal law on the subject was the notorious Comstock Law of 1873, which permitted a special agent of the postal service to open mail dealing with abortion or contraception to suppress the circulation of "obscene" materials. From 1900 until the 1960s, abortions were prohibited by law. However, the Kinsey report noted that premarital pregnancies were electively aborted, and public and clinician opinion began to be shaped by the alarming reports of increased numbers of unsafe illegal abortions.

During the 1950s, the practice of medicine came under increasing scrutiny, and guidelines were set to define the indications for therapeutic abortion. The guidelines allowed therapeutic abortion if (1) pregnancy would "gravely impair the physical and mental health of the mother," (2) the child born was likely to have "grave physical and mental defects," or (3) the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest.

In 1965, 265 deaths occurred due to illegal abortions. Of all pregnancy-related complications in New York and California, 20% were due to abortions. A series of US Supreme Court decisions granted increased rights to women and assured their right to autonomy in this process. No decision was more important than Griswold v Connecticut in 1965, which recognized a constitutional right to privacy and ruled that a married couple had a constitutional right to obtain contraceptives from their provider.

Roe v Wade

Roe v Wade was the culmination of the work of a wide consortium of individuals and groups who collectively crafted a strategy to repeal the abortion laws. In 1969, abortion rights supporters held a conference to formalize their goals and formed the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL). Lawyers were committed to expediting universal access to rights at a time when states were slowly liberalizing pertinent laws. Lawyers Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington met the Texas waitress, Norma McCorvey, who wished to have an abortion but was prohibited by law. She would become plaintiff "Jane Roe." Although the ruling came too late for McCorvey's abortion, her case was successfully argued before the US Supreme Court in a decision that instantly granted the right of a woman to seek an abortion.

In 1973, the Roe vs Wade law, in the opinion written by US Supreme Court judge Harry Blackmun (appointed by Richard Nixon), the court ruled that a woman had a right to induced abortion during the first 2 trimesters of pregnancy. He cited the safety of the procedures and the fundamental right of women to be free from the states' legislation concerning this inherently medical decision in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Blackmun sidestepped the question of viability of the pregnancy, specifically stating that scholars in many respected disciplines could not resolve this issue. Therefore, he felt that the court need not resolve this either. Since this ruling, the states have regained much control, and serious restrictions have been placed on abortion services. The Hyde amendment in 1976 prohibited the use of federal funds for abortions, except in the case of maternal life endangerment. Since then, an estimated one third of public funding recipients cannot obtain an abortion because of inability to pay for the service.

Viability determinations

Loosely defined, the term viability is the fetus' ability to survive extrauterine life with or without life support. A number of landmark US Supreme Court decisions dealt with this question. In Webster v Reproductive Health Services (1989), the court upheld the state of Missouri's requirement for preabortion viability testing after 20 weeks' gestation. However, there are no reliable or medically acceptable tests for this prior to 28 weeks' gestation.

The preamble to this law states that life begins at conception, and the unborn are entitled to the same constitutional rights as all others. By 1992, in a ruling controversial for its inclusion of mandatory waiting periods, elaborate consent processes, and record-keeping regulations, Planned Parenthood v Casey tried to address the issue of viability by inserting language recognizing that some fetuses never attain viability (eg, anencephaly). In Colautti v Franklin, the court overturned a Pennsylvania law requiring physicians to follow specific directives in certain medical circumstances and recognized physician judgment as sacrosanct and important.

Parental consent

Parental consent is not required in the case of carrying a pregnancy to term, seeking contraception, or being treated for a variety of conditions, including sexually transmitted diseases. In 2 decisions handed down in 1991, Hodgson v Minnesota and Ohio v Akron Center for Reproductive Health, the US Supreme Court held that it is legal to have parental notification laws for abortions. These provisions often include waiting periods and fairly limited provisions for judicial bypass. On February 12, 2002, the West Virginia Senate Health and Human Resources Committee passed a bill requiring women seeking an abortion to give informed consent and wait for at least 24 hours before undergoing the abortion procedure. Specifically, the women must be furnished with written material, printed by the state, that would outline alternatives to abortion and the potential risks of the procedure.

On February 21, 2002, the Kentucky Senate passed 2 abortion-related bills. Kentucky SB 151 makes the existing consent laws more rigorous by requiring a woman to meet with a provider in person to receive preabortion counseling. Given that women must travel to access services, these laws quickly become restrictive for low-income care recipients.

Sociologic research shows that a good portion of minors (persons <18 y) do involve their parents in their decision to abort (45%). However, these laws have fostered a new ominous trend, ie, minors obtaining abortions significantly later in their pregnancies and often traveling great distances to states with no such law.

Intact dilation and extraction

The recently crafted political term "partial-birth abortion" loosely means "partially vaginally delivering a living fetus before killing the fetus and completing the delivery." This delineation is so overly broad that both legal and expert gynecologic testimony claim this definition encompasses virtually all methods of second-trimester abortion, including dilation and extraction and inductions.

In 19 US states, laws have banned these procedures; in only 8 US states are these laws enforced. In his first administration, US President Clinton vetoed 2 bills banning such abortions. The US Supreme Court ruled on June 28, 2000 that the Nebraska law and all other laws banning partial-birth abortion are unconstitutional. The reasons for the US Supreme Court's decision was that the Nebraska law did not contain an exception to protect the health of the mother, and the law was also thought to "unduly burden" a woman's choice to end her own pregnancy.

Recently, the US Department of Justice filed an amicus brief, on behalf of the Bush administration, asking the Sixth US Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a decision by a lower court, which struck down the Ohio ban on late-term abortions. This ban was struck down by US District Court Judge Walter Rice because the legislation does not allow for the procedure when a woman's life is in danger.

Similarly, in Stenberg v Carhart, the US Supreme Court struck down Nebraska's ban on late-term abortions for the same reason, ie, because it may be necessary if a woman's life is in danger. However, the US Department of Justice states the Ohio ban is constitutional because it includes the provisions set up by the US Supreme Court in Stenberg v Carhart.

Providers

Providers of elective induced abortions are generally obstetricians and gynecologists. However, many studies have shown the safety of allowing a variety of other health care providers—physicians, physician assistants, midwives, and nurse practitioners—to perform these procedures. Various factors over the years have influenced the number of providers.

Abortion is the only common surgical procedure that is elective in obstetric and gynecologic residencies. Thus, few board-certified gynecologists are actually qualified to perform the procedure. Increasing violence against providers and clinics has further decreased providers' willingness to provide abortion services. A "graying" has occurred in providers who continue to perform abortions. Most represent an older population of clinicians who became committed to providing access to safe, legal abortions after caring for young women who experienced morbidity or died from complications of an illegal abortion. For example, the number of abortion providers decreased by 14% from 1992-1996, suggesting a number of clinicians retired and new clinicians were not taking on the abortion services. The lack of abortion providers is underscored by the fact that 86% of counties in the United States have no abortion services.

Current New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a Republican, proposed a policy that will include abortion training for medical residents in all 11 of the city's hospitals. Recently, the number of abortion providers in the United States has declined because of the aging population of providers and the lack of training during residency. Students, of course, are able to opt out of the training if they are morally opposed to abortion. In contrast, the Kentucky Senate also passed a bill that allows pharmacists who oppose abortion to opt out from dispensing medical abortion pills.

Medical abortion protocols have the potential to expand the number of available providers because arranging for backup with a provider who can perform a surgical abortion is necessary, while having a staff willing to assist at a surgical abortion is not necessary. The role of nurse practitioners, with valid prescription privileges, is unclear at the present time, but these providers may also aid in expanding abortion access.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved mifepristone (Mifeprex), also known as RU-486, for medical abortions. Multiple regimens for medical terminations using medications approved by the FDA for indications other than termination of pregnancy have come into use. The lack of abortion providers to perform surgical terminations has led to the popular belief that individuals not willing or not skilled enough (through training or licensure) to perform surgical terminations will be willing to prescribe medications for medical termination. This may be difficult to track statistically but may actually lead to an increased number of abortions in the United States.

A variety of medical, social, ethical, and philosophical issues affect the availability of and restrictions on abortion services in the United States. An understanding of the laws (enacted, enjoined, and pending) on local and federal levels is important to providers, and these legal ramifications are also reviewed in this article (see Medical/Legal Pitfalls).

Abortion postoperative care is often provided at sites where the abortion was not performed, and strategies for follow-up care for women whose pregnancies have been terminated are important for all providers of primary care for women.

Therapeutic Abortion

The ability to define therapeutic abortion performed for maternal indications is difficult because of the subjective nature of decisions made about potential morbidity and mortality in pregnant women. A variety of medical conditions in pregnant women have the potential to affect health and cause complications that may be life threatening.

Prenatal screening in the form of prenatal diagnostic testing continues to improve the antepartum diagnosis of fetal anomalies. The decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy complicated by fetal anomalies is a difficult decision. The most difficult decisions are associated with anomalies that are unpredictable or highly variable in their expression.

The increase in the use of assisted reproductive technologies has been associated with an enormous increase in multifetal pregnancies. Twins have increased in frequency from 1 set per 90 pregnancies to 1 set per 45 pregnancies. Higher-order multifetal pregnancies have quadrupled in the past 20 years. These pregnancies are complicated by increased fetal morbidity and mortality rates, which are largely caused by prematurity and growth retardation. Selective reduction has been introduced as a technology to improve perinatal outcomes in these pregnancies and has been successful in reducing preterm deliveries and associated perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Indications for pregnancy termination

Most providers consider all terminations to be elective, or a voluntary decision made by the patient herself. There are medical factors both maternal and fetal that contribute to the decision. These factors have been termed therapeutic abortion, defined as the termination of pregnancy for medical indications, including the following:

  • Medical illness in the mother in which continuation of the pregnancy has the potential to threaten the life or health of the mother. Consider the present medical condition and a reasonable prediction of future circumstances, as well as the consequences of the pregnancy as it progresses.
  • The total incidence of malignancy during pregnancy is estimated at 1 case per 1000 pregnancies. The most common cancers found in pregnant women mirror those found in their nonpregnant counterparts, to include the following:
  • Rape or incest
  • Fetal anomalies when pregnancy outcome is likely to be birth of a child with significant mental or physical defects or high likelihood of intrauterine or neonatal death.
  • Approximately 3-5% of all newborns have a recognizable birth defect. According to Cunningham and MacDonald10, the suggested causes of fetal anomalies are as follows:
    • Genetic (ie, chromosomal) (20-25%)
    • Fetal infections (3-5%)
    • Maternal disease (4%)
    • Drugs/medications (<1%)
    • Unknown (65-70%)
  • Intrauterine fetal demise

Pathophysiology

Surgical termination

The development of accurate over-the-counter pregnancy tests allows for the diagnosis of pregnancy 1-2 weeks after conception. Terminations performed in this very early time frame have been termed menstrual extractions, a historical reference to a time when, prior to the availability of accurate pregnancy tests, providers made the presumptive diagnosis based on clinical history and performed extremely early suction evacuations without histologic tissue confirmation, allowing for maximum confidentiality for both patient and provider.

Abortions performed prior to 9 weeks from the last menstrual period (LMP) (7 wk from conception) are performed either surgically or medically. Most abortions are performed in an ambulatory office setting under local anesthesia with or without sedation.

The following methods are available for surgical abortion:

  • Manual vacuum aspiration (menstrual extraction) is used at 4-10 weeks' gestation and is 99.2% effective.
  • Suction curettage is used at 6-14 weeks' gestation.
  • Sharp curettage is used at 4-14 weeks' gestation but is not currently used because of increased blood loss and retained product of conception (POC) compared with suction.
  • Dilation and extraction (D&E) is used at 14-24 weeks' gestation.
  • Intact dilation and extraction (D&X) is used at more than 18 weeks' gestation, but is not performed in the US without prior feticide treatments due to current laws.
  • Hysterotomy is used at 12-24 weeks of gestation and is reserved for the rare instances in which all other methods of abortion have failed or are contraindicated.
  • Hysterectomy is reserved for rare instances in which other gynecological pathology dictates removal of the uterus.

Abortions performed earlier in gestation have a lower risk of morbidity and mortality. In the United States, 88% of abortions are performed at 13 weeks' gestation or less, 97% of abortions were performed using surgical methods in the early days of medical abortions, and now some centers are reporting more than 50% of first trimester procedures by medical abortion protocols.

In the second trimester, options for abortion include D&E, D&X, labor induction methods, and hysterotomy/hysterectomy. D&E is considered the safest form of abortion in the second trimester. In contrast, D&X is reputed to pose a greater health risk to the mother (increased risk of cervical incompetence, uterine rupture, abruption, amniotic fluid embolism, and uterine trauma) when compared with that of D&E. However, little published data exist regarding the frequency or complication rates for D&X since it has been a relatively ill-defined procedure until recently. A retrospective study has shown comparable complication rates and obstetric outcomes between these 2 procedures when performed by experienced physicians.

Labor induction methods have increasing morbidity/mortality as compared with that of D&E. Hysterectomy/hysterotomy procedures have the highest risk of complications but may still have a role in very rare clinical situations (eg, stenotic cervical os, placenta accreta, leiomyoma obstructing cervical os).

Women with a history of prior cesarean delivery are at particularly increased risk of morbidity/mortality when undergoing labor induction as a form of surgical abortion. Labor induction resulted in a 20-fold increased odds ratio of uterine rupture and 2-fold increased risk of blood transfusion in women with a history of prior cesarean delivery as compared with those without a uterine scar. Thus, women with a history of a prior cesarean delivery should undergo either D&E or D&X as the method of surgical abortion.

Medical termination

Medical abortion is a term applied to a medication-induced elective abortion. This can be accomplished with a variety of medications administered either singly or in succession. Medical abortion has a success rate that ranges from 75-95%, with approximately 2-4% of failed abortions requiring surgical abortion and approximately 5-10% of incomplete abortions, depending on the stage of gestation and the medical products used. For a review of multiple studies, see Kahn et al.1 Patients who select a medical abortion express a slightly greater satisfaction with their route of abortion and, in most cases, express a wish to choose this method again should they have another abortion. Research needs to be performed to more clearly establish which protocol is best, which medications are preferable, and how successfully women and adolescents can diagnose a complete versus an incomplete abortion.

Although a critical shortage of providers exists who can provide surgical abortions, in a recent study by Koenig et al, providers who do not perform surgical abortions have indicated a willingness to provide medical abortions.2

Medical abortions can provide some measure of safety in that they eliminate the risk of cervical lacerations and uterine perforations. Some patients require an emergency surgical abortion, and, for safety concerns, patients undergoing medical abortions need access to providers willing to perform an elective termination.

In September of 2000, the FDA approved mifepristone (RU-486) for use in a specific medical regimen that includes misoprostol administration for those who do not abort with mifepristone alone. Methotrexate and misoprostol are drugs approved for other indications that can also be used for medical termination of pregnancy. Additional research will determine exactly which regimen is ideal for medical abortions.

Medical abortions have additional management issues for patients and clinicians. The process involves bleeding, often heavy, which must be differentiated from hemorrhage. Regardless of the amount of tissue passed, the patient must be seen for evaluation of the completeness of the process.

The medical regimens initiate the process with progesterone receptor blockage by mifepristone without activating the receptor. This leads to a progesterone effect withdrawal from the decidua with ensuing necrosis and eventual detachment of the placenta at its implantation site. Following this with a prostaglandin, usually misoprostol, then leads to uterine activity and expulsion of the products of conception. It works best up to day 49 of pregnancy and regimens up to day 63 are effective as well.

A rare and serious infection of Clostridium sordellii is related to medical abortions. Four deaths associated with this infection have been reported since 2001. Fatal infections are rare, occurring in fewer than 1 in 100,000 uses of mifepristone medical abortions, which is far less fatal than penicillin-induced anaphylaxis (1 in 50,000 uses).

Frequency

United States

Abortion statistics are available from a variety of sources, including, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The Alan Guttmacher Institute, and the National Abortion Federation. Information and specific instructions regarding state requirements for abortion reporting are available from vital statistics offices in each state health department. Comprehensive statistical information is regarded as important in ensuring the utmost in patient safety.

In 1996, approximately 20 women for every 1000 women aged 15-44 years had an abortion, and for every 1000 live births, approximately 325 abortions were performed. In the past 20 years, considerable progress has been made in the technology used for second-trimester abortion. This and the social milieu of abortion have led to more women seeking terminations later in pregnancy. In 2000, only 12.5% of abortions were performed in the second trimester of pregnancy (CDC), of which almost all between 13 and 20 weeks were surgical abortions, the others being performed by labor induction.

International

Globally, abortion mortality accounts for at least 13% of all maternal mortality. New estimates are that 50 million induced abortions are performed each year in developing countries, with approximately 20 million of these performed unsafely because of conditions or lack of provider training. Maternal mortality is 600,000 deaths per year due to pregnancy-related causes, and 99% of these deaths are in developing countries. While in the United States, only 1% of abortions are performed by induction, globally about 16% of all abortions, some as early as 12 weeks of gestation are performed by labor induction.

Mortality/Morbidity

The safety of abortion is well established, with infection rates less than 1%, and fewer than 1 in 100,000 mortalities occurs from first-trimester abortions. At every gestational age, elective abortion is safer for the mother than carrying a pregnancy to term. Medical abortions, or those performed primarily by medication prior to any surgical intervention, are even safer than surgical abortions at the same gestational age.

Mortality rates are highest with the most invasive procedures and with increasing gestational age, as follows: 0.4 of 100,000 cases at less than 8 weeks of gestation, 3 of 100,000 cases at 13-15 weeks of gestation, and 12 of 100,000 cases at more than 21 weeks of gestation. Causes of death include infection, hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, anesthesia complications, and amniotic fluid embolism. Death rates with hysterotomy/hysterectomy are 64.9 of 100,000 cases at 13-15 weeks of gestation and 123 of 100,000 cases at more than 21 weeks of gestation.

Race

Unintended pregnancy rates are 40% among white women, 69% among black women, and 54% among Hispanic women. (Guttmacher Institute, July 2008)

Age

Abortion rates are highest among 20- to 24-year-old women; rates are lowest among women younger than 20 years and those older than 40 years. Although abortion rates are lower in the latter two groups, these women are far more likely to have a pregnancy termination if they become pregnant.

Clinical

History

Most terminations of pregnancy are performed after a brief and targeted gynecologic and obstetric history is obtained. Providers should obtain information about any prior pregnancies and information regarding any treatment or care during the current pregnancy. The history taking should also focus on prior gynecologic disease, with particular attention to previous or current sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Medical history that might be important includes a history of diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, anemia, bleeding disorders, or gynecologic surgery. A history of active medical problems may indicate that the patient needs to be medically stabilized prior to the abortion or have the procedure performed in a facility that can handle special medical problems.

  • Maternal indications for abortion
    • With advances in perinatal care, few medical contraindications exist for pregnancy. Perinatologists, obstetricians, and abortion counselors prefer to put the risks in the context of the statistical likelihood of complications, and then let the patient make her final decision.
    • Women take on less risk, regardless of health or gestational age, to terminate a pregnancy than to continue to term. These abortions have been termed therapeutic abortions.
    • Maternal medical conditions that carry significant risks in pregnancy include severe diabetes with retinopathy, cardiac or renal complications, advanced cardiac disease, renal failure, sickle cell disease, autoimmune disease, and psychiatric disease.
    • Cardiac conditions that still carry maternal mortality rates of 5-15% include severe mitral stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, uncorrected tetralogy of Fallot, aortic stenosis, history of myocardial infarction, and the presence of artificial heart valves. Higher mortality rates have been reported in women with coarctation of the aorta with vascular involvement, pulmonary hypertension, Marfan syndrome with aortic involvement, and myocardial infarction in pregnancy.
    • Nondirective counseling can help a woman select her choice.
  • Fetal indications for abortion
    • Fetal conditions that are incompatible with life include anencephaly, trisomy 13, trisomy 18, renal agenesis, thanatophoric dysplasia, alobar holoprosencephaly, and some hydrocephalic cases.
    • Many hypoplastic cardiac conditions are also incompatible with life. However, with cardiac transplantation, some infants can now survive with these defects.
    • The most common fetal anomalies encountered in abortion counseling include most fetal cardiac anomalies; trisomy 21; open and closed neural tube defects; limb, face, or cleft abnormalities; esophageal or duodenal atresia; chest and abdominal wall defects; cystic kidneys or hydronephrosis; intracranial calcifications suggestive of viral disease; or diaphragmatic defects.

Physical

  • A brief physical examination is usually conducted prior to an abortion procedure. The focus is on dating the pregnancy, ensuring the absence of other gynecologic pathology (particularly STIs), and assessing the patient's suitability for an operative procedure under local sedation.
  • Note any vaginal or cervical discharge, the nature of the cervix, and any lesions. Document the presence or absence of any ovarian pathology.
  • If the patient is planned for general anesthesia, a typical screening preoperative physical examination can be performed.

Causes

Contraindications

Absolute contraindications are virtually unknown. If abortion presents a medical risk to the patient, then continuation of the pregnancy presents an even greater risk. The type and timing of an abortion procedure or method may be contraindicated based on the medical, surgical, or psychiatric condition of the patient.

  • Medical abortion is contraindicated in patients with clotting disorders, severe liver disease, renal disease, cardiac disease, and chronic steroid use.
  • Medical abortion is also contraindicated in women with no access to emergency services and no partners or family to be with the patient during the heaviest bleeding times.
  • Surgical abortion is contraindicated in patients with hemodynamic instability, profound anemia, and/or profound thrombocytopenia. The conditions should be managed and the context of pregnancy continuation must be considered.
  • The rare instance of placenta accreta and percreta in the second trimester may necessitate laparotomy with hysterotomy or hysterectomy.
  • Previous uterine incisions, including cesarean deliveries or multiple cesarean deliveries have been regarded as a contraindication to medical protocols, but some recent literature has suggested this may be safe.

More on Elective Abortion

Overview: Elective Abortion
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Elective Abortion
Treatment & Medication: Elective Abortion
Follow-up: Elective Abortion
References
[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

References

  1. Kahn JG, Becker BJ, MacIsaa L, et al. The efficacy of medical abortion: a meta-analysis. Contraception. Jan 2000;61(1):29-40. [Medline].

  2. Koenig JD, Tapias MP, Hoff T, Stewart FH. Are US health professionals likely to prescribe mifepristone or methotrexate?. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):155-60. [Medline].

  3. [Best Evidence] Dickinson JE, Doherty DA. Optimization of third-stage management after second-trimester medical pregnancy termination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2009;201(3):303.e1-7. [Medline].

  4. Perry KG Jr, Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Martin RW, May WL, Roberts WE. Second-trimester uterine evacuation: A comparison of intra-amniotic (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha and intravaginal misoprostol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1999;181(5 Pt 1):1057-61. [Medline].

  5. Pridmore BR, Chambers DG. Uterine perforation during surgical abortion: a review of diagnosis, management and prevention. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. Aug 1999;39(3):349-53. [Medline].

  6. Hakim-Elahi E, Tovell HM, Burnhill MS. Complications of first-trimester abortion: a report of 170,000 cases. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 1990;76(1):129-35. [Medline].

  7. Kafrissen ME, Barke MW, Workman P, Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Coagulopathy and induced abortion methods: rates and relative risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1 1983;147(3):344-5. [Medline].

  8. Zhou W, Sorensen HT, Olsen J. Induced abortion and subsequent pregnancy duration. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1999;94(6):948-53. [Medline].

  9. Hendricks MS, Chow YH, Bhagavath B, Singh K. Previous cesarean section and abortion as risk factors for developing placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. Apr 1999;25(2):137-42. [Medline].

  10. Eras JL, Saftlas AF, Triche E, Hsu CD, Risch HA, Bracken MB. Abortion and its effect on risk of preeclampsia and transient hypertension. Epidemiology. Jan 2000;11(1):36-43. [Medline].

  11. Challis D, Gratacos E, Deprest JA. Cord occlusion techniques for selective termination in monochorionic twins. J Perinat Med. 1999;27(5):327-38. [Medline].

  12. Acharya PS, Gluckman SJ. Bacteremia following placement of intracervical laminaria tents. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 1999;29(3):695-7. [Medline].

  13. ACOG. ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines of obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 67, October 2005. Medical management of abortion. Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2005;106(4):871-82. [Medline].

  14. ACOG. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Methods of Midtrimester Abortion. ACOG Technical Bulletin. 1987;109:602-05.

  15. ACOG Compendium of Selected Publications. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Abortion Policy. 2005;865-867.

  16. Aiyer AN, Ruiz G, Steinman A, Ho GY. Influence of physician attitudes on willingness to perform abortion. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1999;93(4):576-80. [Medline].

  17. Ashok PW, Templeton A. Nonsurgical mid-trimester termination of pregnancy: a review of 500 consecutive cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Jul 1999;106(7):706-10. [Medline].

  18. Baird DT. Mode of action of medical methods of abortion. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):121-6. [Medline].

  19. Ballagh SA, Harris HA, Demasio K. Is curettage needed for uncomplicated incomplete spontaneous abortion?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1998;179(5):1279-82. [Medline].

  20. Bartholomew LL, Grimes DA. The alleged association between induced abortion and risk of breast cancer: biology or bias?. Obstet Gynecol Surv. Nov 1998;53(11):708-14. [Medline].

  21. Begley AM. Preparation for practice in the new millennium: a discussion of the moral implications of multifetal pregnancy reduction. Nurs Ethics. Mar 2000;7(2):99-112. [Medline].

  22. Berer M. Making abortions safe: a matter of good public health policy and practice. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(5):580-92. [Medline].

  23. Bernick BA, Ufberg DD, Nemiroff R, Donnenfeld A, Tolosa JE. Success rate of cytogenetic analysis at the time of second-trimester dilation and evacuation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1998;179(4):957-61. [Medline].

  24. Bernstein PS, Rosenfield A. Abortion and maternal health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Dec 1998;63 Suppl 1:S115-22. [Medline].

  25. Blanchard K, Winikoff B, Ellertson C. Misoprostol used alone for the termination of early pregnancy. A review of the evidence. Contraception. Apr 1999;59(4):209-17. [Medline].

  26. Borgatta L, Burnhill M, Haskell S, Nichols M, Leonhardt K. Instituting medical abortion services: changes in outcome and acceptability related to provider experience. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):173-6. [Medline].

  27. Borgatta L, Chen AY, Reid SK, Stubblefield PG, Christensen DD, Rashbaum WK. Pelvic embolization for treatment of hemorrhage related to spontaneous and induced abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2001;185(3):530-6. [Medline].

  28. Borgmann CE, Jones BS. Legal issues in the provision of medical abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2000;183(2 Suppl):S84-94. [Medline].

  29. Bourguignon A, Briscoe B, Nemzer L. Genetic abortion: considerations for patient care. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. Sep 1999;13(2):47-58. [Medline].

  30. Breitbart V, Repass DC. The counseling component of medical abortion. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):164-6. [Medline].

  31. Cakir L, Dilbaz B, Caliskan E, Dede FS, Dilbaz S, Haberal A. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before manual vacuum aspiration of first trimester pregnancy under local anesthesia: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Contraception. May 2005;71(5):337-42. [Medline].

  32. Castadot RG. Pregnancy termination: techniques, risks, and complications and their management. Fertil Steril. Jan 1986;45(1):5-17. [Medline].

  33. Cates W, Ellertson C. Contraceptive Technology. In: Hatcher RA, Trussel J, Stewart F, et al. Abortion. 17th ed. New York, NY: Ardent Media; 1998:682-697.

  34. Chapman SJ, Crispens M, Owen J, Savage K. Complications of midtrimester pregnancy termination: the effect of prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1996;175(4 Pt 1):889-92. [Medline].

  35. Chasen ST, Kalish RB, Gupta M, Kaufman JE, Rashbaum WK, Chervenak FA. Dilation and evacuation at >or=20 weeks: comparison of operative techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2004;190(5):1180-3. [Medline].

  36. Christin-Maitre S, Bouchard P, Spitz IM. Medical termination of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. Mar 30 2000;342(13):946-56. [Medline].

  37. Chung TK, Lee DT, Cheung LP, Haines CJ, Chang AM. Spontaneous abortion: a randomized, controlled trial comparing surgical evacuation with conservative management using misoprostol. Fertil Steril. Jun 1999;71(6):1054-9. [Medline].

  38. Clark S, Ellertson C, Winikoff B. Is medical abortion acceptable to all American women: the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the acceptability of mifepristone-misoprostol abortion. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):177-82. [Medline].

  39. Cohen AL, Bhatnagar J, Reagan S, et al. Toxic shock associated with Clostridium sordellii and Clostridium perfringens after medical and spontaneous abortion. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 2007;110(5):1027-33. [Medline].

  40. Cole DS, Bruck LR. Anaphylaxis after laminaria insertion. Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2000;95(6 Pt 2):1025. [Medline].

  41. Cook RJ, Dickens BM. Human rights and abortion laws. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Apr 1999;65(1):81-7. [Medline].

  42. Coyaji K. Early medical abortion in India: three studies and their implications for abortion services. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):191-4. [Medline].

  43. Creinin MD. Conception rates after abortion with methotrexate and misoprostol. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. May 1999;65(2):183-8. [Medline].

  44. Creinin MD. Medical abortion regimens: historical context and overview. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2000;183(2 Suppl):S3-9. [Medline].

  45. Creinin MD, Fox MC, Teal S, Chen A, Schaff EA, Meyn LA. A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion. Obstet Gynecol. May 2004;103(5 Pt 1):851-9. [Medline].

  46. Creinin MD, Jerald H. Success rates and estimation of gestational age for medical abortion vary with transvaginal ultrasonographic criteria. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1999;180(1 Pt 1):35-41. [Medline].

  47. Creinin MD, Pymar HC. Medical abortion alternatives to mifepristone. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):127-32, 150. [Medline].

  48. Creinin MD, Spitz IM. Use of various ultrasonographic criteria to evaluate the efficacy of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1999;181(6):1419-24. [Medline].

  49. Creinin MD, Wiebe E, Gold M. Methotrexate and misoprostol for early abortion in adolescent women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. May 1999;12(2):71-7. [Medline].

  50. Cunningham GF, MacDonald PC, Gant NF. Abortion. In: Williams Obstetrics. 19th ed. 1993:661-90.

  51. Daling JR, Emanuel I. Induced abortion and subsequent outcome of pregnancy. A matched cohort study. Lancet. Jul 26 1975;2(7926):170-3. [Medline].

  52. Davis A, Westhoff C, De Nonno L. Bleeding patterns after early abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol or manual vacuum aspiration. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):141-4. [Medline].

  53. Dean G, Cardenas L, Darney P, Goldberg A. Acceptability of manual versus electric aspiration for first trimester abortion: a randomized trial. Contraception. Mar 2003;67(3):201-6. [Medline].

  54. Delfs E, Katayama KP. Surgical Management of Reproductive Failure and Abortion. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. Fifth Edition. 1977:429-451.

  55. Dobie SA, Hart LG, Glusker A, Madigan D, Larson EH, Rosenblatt RA. Abortion services in rural Washington State, 1983-1984 to 1993-1994: availability and outcomes. Fam Plann Perspect. Sep-Oct 1999;31(5):241-5. [Medline].

  56. Drey EA, Thomas LJ, Benowitz NL, Goldschlager N, Darney PD. Safety of intra-amniotic digoxin administration before late second-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2000;182(5):1063-6. [Medline].

  57. Edmondson AS, Cooke EM. The development and assessment of a bacteriocin typing method for Klebsiella. J Hyg (Lond). Apr 1979;82(2):207-23. [Medline].

  58. Elimian A, Verma U, Tejani N. Effect of causing fetal cardiac asystole on second-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 1999;94(1):139-41. [Medline].

  59. Elul B, Ellertson C, Winikoff B, Coyaji K. Side effects of mifepristone-misoprostol abortion versus surgical abortion. Data from a trial in China, Cuba, and India. Contraception. Feb 1999;59(2):107-14. [Medline].

  60. Elul B, Pearlman E, Sorhaindo A, Simonds W, Westhoff C. In-depth interviews with medical abortion clients: thoughts on the method and home administration of misoprostol. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):169-72. [Medline].

  61. Epner JE, Jonas HS, Seckinger DL. Late-term abortion. JAMA. Aug 26 1998;280(8):724-9. [Medline].

  62. Evans MI, Goldberg JD, Horenstein J, et al. Selective termination for structural, chromosomal, and mendelian anomalies: international experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1999;181(4):893-7. [Medline].

  63. Fitzpatrick KM, Wilson M. Exposure to violence and posttraumatic stress symptomatology among abortion clinic workers. J Trauma Stress. Apr 1999;12(2):227-42. [Medline].

  64. Fong YF, Singh K, Prasad RN. Severe hyperthermia following use of vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical priming. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jan 1999;64(1):73-4. [Medline].

  65. Frank PI, McNamee R, Hannaford PC, Kay CR, Hirsch S. The effect of induced abortion on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Oct 1991;98(10):1015-24. [Medline].

  66. Geva E, Fait G, Yovel I, et al. Second-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction facilitates prenatal diagnosis before the procedure. Fertil Steril. Mar 2000;73(3):505-8. [Medline].

  67. Gouk EV, Lincoln K, Khair A, Haslock J, Knight J, Cruickshank DJ. Medical termination of pregnancy at 63 to 83 days gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Jun 1999;106(6):535-9. [Medline].

  68. Grimes D, Schulz K, Stanwood N. Immediate post-abortal insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;CD001777. [Medline].

  69. Grimes DA. A 26-year-old woman seeking an abortion. JAMA. Sep 22-29 1999;282(12):1169-75. [Medline].

  70. Grimes DA. The continuing need for late abortions. JAMA. Aug 26 1998;280(8):747-50. [Medline].

  71. Grimes DA. Unsafe abortion: the silent scourge. Br Med Bull. 2003;67:99-113. [Medline].

  72. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Morbidity and mortality from second-trimester abortions. J Reprod Med. Jul 1985;30(7):505-14. [Medline].

  73. Hamoda H, Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A. A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. BJOG. Aug 2005;112(8):1102-8. [Medline].

  74. Hamoda H, Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A. Medical abortion at 64 to 91 days of gestation: a review of 483 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2003;188(5):1315-9. [Medline].

  75. Hamoda H, Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A. Medical abortion at 9-13 weeks' gestation: a review of 1076 consecutive cases. Contraception. May 2005;71(5):327-32. [Medline].

  76. Heath V, Chadwick V, Cooke I, Manek S, MacKenzie IZ. Should tissue from pregnancy termination and uterine evacuation routinely be examined histologically?. BJOG. Jun 2000;107(6):727-30. [Medline].

  77. Hellberg D, Mogilevkina I, Mardh PA. Sexually transmitted diseases and gynecologic symptoms and signs in women with a history of induced abortion. Sex Transm Dis. Apr 1999;26(4):197-200. [Medline].

  78. Henshaw SK. Abortion incidence and services in the United States, 1995-1996. Fam Plann Perspect. Nov-Dec 1998;30(6):263-70, 287. [Medline].

  79. Hern WM. Second-trimester surgical abortions. In: Sciarra JJ. Gynecology and Obstetrics. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co; 2002.

  80. Isley MM, Blumenthal P. Medical Abortion What's Old, what's new?. Contemporary OB GYN. Apr 15 2008;30-38.

  81. Jackson RA, Teplin VL, Drey EA, Thomas LJ, Darney PD. Digoxin to facilitate late second-trimester abortion: a randomized, masked, placebo-controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. Mar 2001;97(3):471-6. [Medline].

  82. Jain JK, Kuo J, Mishell DR Jr. A comparison of two dosing regimens of intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1999;93(4):571-5. [Medline].

  83. Jain JK, Meckstroth KR, Mishell DR Jr. Early pregnancy termination with intravaginally administered sodium chloride solution-moistened misoprostol tablets: historical comparison with mifepristone and oral misoprostol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1999;181(6):1386-91. [Medline].

  84. Jain JK, Meckstroth KR, Park M, Mishell DR Jr. A comparison of tamoxifen and misoprostol to misoprostol alone for early pregnancy termination. Contraception. Dec 1999;60(6):353-6. [Medline].

  85. Jensen JT, Harvey SM, Beckman LJ. Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: a prospective comparison study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2000;182(6):1292-9. [Medline].

  86. Jensen MP, Miller L, Fisher LD. Assessment of pain during medical procedures: a comparison of three scales. Clin J Pain. Dec 1998;14(4):343-9. [Medline].

  87. Jermy K, Oyelese O, Bourne T. Uterine anomalies and failed surgical termination of pregnancy: the role of routine preoperative transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1999;14(6):431-3. [Medline].

  88. Jones BS, Heller S. Providing medical abortion: legal issues of relevance to providers. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):145-50. [Medline].

  89. Joyce T, Kaestner R. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion. Fam Plann Perspect. Jan-Feb 2000;32(1):4-13. [Medline].

  90. Kafrissen ME, Grimes DA, Hogue CJ, Sacks JJ. Cluster of abortion deaths at a single facility. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1986;68(3):387-9. [Medline].

  91. Kalish RB, Chasen ST, Rosenzweig LB, Rashbaum WK, Chervenak FA. Impact of midtrimester dilation and evacuation on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2002;187(4):882-5. [Medline].

  92. Keder LM. Best practices in surgical abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2003;189(2):418-22. [Medline].

  93. Kero A, Hogberg U, Lalos A. Wellbeing and mental growth-long-term effects of legal abortion. Soc Sci Med. Jun 2004;58(12):2559-69. [Medline].

  94. Kero A. Wellbeing and mental growth - long term effects of legal abortion.

  95. Kjems E, Krag C. Melanoma and pregnancy. A review. Acta Oncol. 1993;32(4):371-8. [Medline].

  96. Koonin LM. Abortion reporting in the era of medical procedures: why is it important?. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):203-4. [Medline].

  97. Kruse B. Advanced practice clinicians and medical abortion: increasing access to care. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):167-8. [Medline].

  98. Kruse B, Poppema S, Creinin MD, Paul M. Management of side effects and complications in medical abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2000;183(2 Suppl):S65-75. [Medline].

  99. Lahteenmaki P, Luukkainen T. Return of ovarian function after abortion. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Feb 1978;8(2):123-32. [Medline].

  100. Larsson PG, Platz-Christensen JJ, Dalaker K, et al. Treatment with 2% clindamycin vaginal cream prior to first trimester surgical abortion to reduce signs of postoperative infection: a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. May 2000;79(5):390-6. [Medline].

  101. Lazovich D, Thompson JA, Mink PJ, Sellers TA, Anderson KE. Induced abortion and breast cancer risk. Epidemiology. Jan 2000;11(1):76-80. [Medline].

  102. Levgur M, Abadi MA, Tucker A. Adenomyosis: symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations. Obstet Gynecol. May 2000;95(5):688-91. [Medline].

  103. Lichtenberg ES, Shott S. A randomized clinical trial of prophylaxis for vacuum abortion: 3 versus 7 days of doxycycline. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2003;101(4):726-31. [Medline].

  104. Linn S, Schoenbaum SC, Monson RR, Rosner B, Stubblefield PG, Ryan KJ. The relationship between induced abortion and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 15 1983;146(2):136-40. [Medline].

  105. Macisaac L, Darney P. Early surgical abortion: an alternative to and backup for medical abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2000;183(2 Suppl):S76-83. [Medline].

  106. MacIsaac L, Grossman D, Balistreri E, Darney P. A randomized controlled trial of laminaria, oral misoprostol, and vaginal misoprostol before abortion. Obstet Gynecol. May 1999;93(5 Pt 1):766-70. [Medline].

  107. Major B, Gramzow RH. Abortion as stigma: cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. J Pers Soc Psychol. Oct 1999;77(4):735-45. [Medline].

  108. Mansfield C, Hopfer S, Marteau TM. Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review. European Concerted Action: DADA (Decision-making After the Diagnosis of a fetal Abnormality). Prenat Diagn. Sep 1999;19(9):808-12. [Medline].

  109. Martin CW, Brown AH, Baird DT. A pilot study of the effect of methotrexate or combined oral contraceptive on bleeding patterns after induction of abortion with mifepristone and a prostaglandin pessary. Contraception. Aug 1998;58(2):99-103. [Medline].

  110. Mayr NA, Wen BC, Saw CB. Radiation therapy during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Jun 1998;25(2):301-21. [Medline].

  111. Mcfarlane DR. Induced abortion: an historical overview. Am J Gynecol Health. May-Jun 1993;7(3):77-82. [Medline].

  112. Medich DS, Fazio VW. Hemorrhoids, anal fissure, and carcinoma of the colon, rectum, and anus during pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am. Feb 1995;75(1):77-88. [Medline].

  113. Miller VL, Ransom SB, Shalhoub A, Sokol RJ, Evans MI. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: perinatal and fiscal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2000;182(6):1575-80. [Medline].

  114. Nielsen S, Hahlin M, Platz-Christensen J. Randomised trial comparing expectant with medical management for first trimester miscarriages. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Aug 1999;106(8):804-7. [Medline].

  115. Oteri O, Hopkins R. Second trimester therapeutic abortion using mifepristone and oral misoprostol in a woman with two previous caesarean sections and a cone biopsy. J Matern Fetal Med. Nov-Dec 1999;8(6):300-1. [Medline].

  116. Owen J, Hauth JC. Vaginal misoprostol vs. concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose prostaglandin E2 for second trimester pregnancy termination. J Matern Fetal Med. Mar-Apr 1999;8(2):48-50. [Medline].

  117. Pakarinen P, Toivonen J, Luukkainen T. Randomized comparison of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine systems immediately after abortion, with 5 years' follow-up. Contraception. Jul 2003;68(1):31-4. [Medline].

  118. Papiernik E, Grange G, Zeitlin J. Should multifetal pregnancy reduction be used for prevention of preterm deliveries in triplet or higher order multiple pregnancies?. J Perinat Med. 1998;26(5):365-70. [Medline].

  119. Paul M. Office management of early induced abortion. Clin Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1999;42(2):290-305. [Medline].

  120. Paul M, Lichtenberg ES, Borgatta L. A Clinician's Guide to Medical and Surgical Abortion. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.

  121. Paul M, Schaff E, Nichols M. The roles of clinical assessment, human chorionic gonadotropin assays, and ultrasonography in medical abortion practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2000;183(2 Suppl):S34-43. [Medline].

  122. Paul ME, Mitchell CM, Rogers AJ, Fox MC, Lackie EG. Early surgical abortion: efficacy and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2002;187(2):407-11. [Medline].

  123. Penfield AJ. Gynecologic Surgery Under Local Anesthesia. Baltimore, Md: Urban & Schwarzenburg; 1986:65-94.

  124. Perry KG Jr, Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Martin RW, May WL, Roberts WE. Second-trimester uterine evacuation: A comparison of intra-amniotic (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha and intravaginal misoprostol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1999;181(5 Pt 1):1057-61. [Medline].

  125. Pope LM, Adler NE, Tschann JM. Postabortion psychological adjustment: are minors at increased risk?. J Adolesc Health. Jul 2001;29(1):2-11. [Medline].

  126. Reeves MF, Lohr PA, Harwood BJ, Creinin MD. Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness after medical and surgical management of early pregnancy failure. Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2008;111(1):106-12. [Medline].

  127. Rosenblatt RA, Robinson KB, Larson EH, Dobie SA. Medical students' attitudes toward abortion and other reproductive health services. Fam Med. Mar 1999;31(3):195-9. [Medline].

  128. Sandstrom O, Brooks L, Schantz A, Grinsted J, Grinsted L, Jacobsen JD. Interruption of early pregnancy with mifepristone in combination with gemeprost. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. Oct 1999;78(9):806-9. [Medline].

  129. Sawaya GF, Grady D, Kerlikowske K, Grimes DA. Antibiotics at the time of induced abortion: the case for universal prophylaxis based on a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. May 1996;87(5 Pt 2):884-90. [Medline].

  130. Schaff EA, Fielding SL. A comparison of the Abortion Rights Mobilization and Population Council trials. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):137-40. [Medline].

  131. Schaff EA, Fielding SL, Eisinger SH, Stadalius LS, Fuller L. Low-dose mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol at 48 hours for abortion up to 63 days. Contraception. Jan 2000;61(1):41-6. [Medline].

  132. Schaff EA, Fielding SL, Westhoff C, et al. Vaginal misoprostol administered 1, 2, or 3 days after mifepristone for early medical abortion: A randomized trial. JAMA. Oct 18 2000;284(15):1948-53. [Medline].

  133. Schüler L, Pastuszak A, Sanseverino TV, et al. Pregnancy outcome after exposure to misoprostol in Brazil: a prospective, controlled study. Reprod Toxicol. Mar-Apr 1999;13(2):147-51. [Medline].

  134. Selam B, Lembet A, Stone J, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes in multifetal pregnancies reduced to twins compared with nonreduced twin pregnancies. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16(2):65-71. [Medline].

  135. Selam B, Torok O, Lembet A, Stone J, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Genetic amniocentesis after multifetal pregnancy reduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1999;180(1 Pt 1):226-30. [Medline].

  136. Shanahan MA, Metheny WP, Star J, Peipert JF. Induced abortion. Physician training and practice patterns. J Reprod Med. May 1999;44(5):428-32. [Medline].

  137. Singh K, Ratnam SS. The influence of abortion legislation on maternal mortality. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Dec 1998;63 Suppl 1:S123-9.

  138. Sorosky JI, Scott-Conner CE. Breast disease complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Jun 1998;25(2):353-63. [Medline].

  139. Stephen JA, Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, Alonso CM. Amniocentesis after multifetal pregnancy reduction: is it safe?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2000;182(4):962-5. [Medline].

  140. Stotland NL. The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome. JAMA. Oct 21 1992;268(15):2078-9. [Medline].

  141. Strauss LT, Herndon J, Chang J, Parker WY, Levy DA, Bowens SB. Abortion surveillance--United States, 2001. MMWR Surveill Summ. Nov 26 2004;53(9):1-32. [Medline].

  142. Trussell J, Ellertson C. Estimating the efficacy of medical abortion. Contraception. Sep 1999;60(3):119-35. [Medline].

  143. Ventura SJ, Mosher WD, Curtin SC, Abma JC, Henshaw S. Trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates by outcome: estimates for the United States, 1976-96. Vital Health Stat 21. Jan 2000;(56):1-47. [Medline].

  144. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Beazoglou T, Knuppel RA. Routine second-trimester ultrasonography in the United States: a cost-benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Mar 2000;182(3):655-60. [Medline].

  145. Westfall JM, Sophocles A, Burggraf H, Ellis S. Manual vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion. Arch Fam Med. Nov-Dec 1998;7(6):559-62. [Medline].

  146. Wiebe E, Guilbert E, Jacot F, Shannon C, Winikoff B. A fatal case of Clostridium sordellii septic shock syndrome associated with medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 2004;104(5 Pt 2):1142-4. [Medline].

  147. Wiebe ER. Comparing abortion induced with methotrexate and misoprostol to methotrexate alone. Contraception. Jan 1999;59(1):7-10. [Medline].

  148. Wiebe ER. Tamoxifen compared to methotrexate when used with misoprostol for abortion. Contraception. Apr 1999;59(4):265-70. [Medline].

  149. World Health Organization. Comparison of two doses of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for early medical abortion: a randomised trial. World Health Organisation Task Force on Post-ovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. BJOG. Apr 2000;107(4):524-30. [Medline].

  150. Wu S. Medical abortion in China. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):197-9, 204. [Medline].

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Further Reading

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Keywords

abortion, surgical termination of pregnancy, elective termination of pregnancy, medical termination of pregnancy, voluntary abortion, therapeutic abortion, menstrual extraction, fetal reduction, pregnancy termination, partial birth abortion, Roe v Wade, intact dilatation and extraction, late-term abortion, elective induced abortion, surgical abortion, medical abortion, dilatation and suction curettage procedure, dilatation and evacuation procedure, labor induction, prostaglandin labor induction, saline infusion, hysterotomy, dilatation and extraction, medication-induced elective abortion, misoprostol, mifepristone, RU-486, incomplete abortion, complete abortion, therapeutic abortion, prostaglandin-induced second-trimester abortion, saline-induced abortion, dilatation and curettage

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Suzanne R Trupin, MD, Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois College of Medicine-Champaign; CEO and Owner, Women's Health Practice; CEO and Owner, Hada Cosmetic Medicine and Midwest Surgical Center
Suzanne R Trupin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Medical Association, Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, International Society for Clinical Densitometry, and North American Menopause Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Steven David Spandorfer, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College-Cornell University
Steven David Spandorfer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and Endocrine Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

A David Barnes, MD, PhD, MPH, FACOG, Consulting Staff, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mammoth Hospital (Mammoth Lakes, California), Pioneer Valley Hospital (Salt Lake City, Utah), Warren General Hospital (Warren, Pennsylvania), and Mountain West Hospital (Tooele, Utah)
A David Barnes, MD, PhD, MPH, FACOG is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Forensic Examiners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, and Utah Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center
Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michel E Rivlin, MD, Professor, Coordinator of Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
Michel E Rivlin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Mississippi State Medical Association, and Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

RELATED EMEDICINE ARTICLES
RELATED MEDSCAPE ARTICLES
 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.