eMedicine Specialties > Obstetrics and Gynecology > Gynecologic Oncology

Cervical Cancer

Author: Agustin A Garcia, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 26, 2009

Introduction

Background

Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy in women worldwide, and it remains a leading cause of cancer-related death for women in developing countries. In the United States, cervical cancer is relatively uncommon. The incidence of invasive cervical cancer has declined steadily in the United States over the past few decades; however, it continues to rise in many developing countries. The change in the epidemiological trend in the United States has been attributed to mass screening with Papanicolaou tests.

Cervical carcinoma with adnexa.

Cervical carcinoma with adnexa.

Cervical carcinoma with adnexa.

Cervical carcinoma with adnexa.



For related information, please see Medscape's Cervical Cancer Resource Center.

Frequency

United States

The American Cancer Society has estimated that in the United States in 2009, 11,270 new cases of cervical cancer will be diagnosed.1 In addition, more than 50,000 cases of carcinoma in situ are diagnosed each year.

International

Internationally, 500,000 new cases are diagnosed each year.

Mortality/Morbidity

The American Cancer Society estimates that 4,070 women will die from cervical cancer in the United States in 2009.1 This represents 1.3% of all cancer deaths and 6.5% of deaths from gynecologic cancers.

Race

In the United States, cervical cancer is more common in Hispanic, African American, and Native American women than in white women.

Sex

Cervical cancer is found only in women.

Age

Cervical cancers usually affect women of middle age or older, but it may be diagnosed in any reproductive-aged woman.

Clinical

History

  • Because women are screened routinely, the most common finding is an abnormal Papanicolaou test result.
  • Clinically, the first symptom is abnormal vaginal bleeding, usually postcoital.
  • Vaginal discomfort, malodorous discharge, and dysuria are not uncommon.
  • The tumor grows by extending upward to the endometrial cavity, downward to the vagina, and laterally to the pelvic wall. It can invade the bladder and rectum directly.
    • Symptoms that can evolve, such as constipation, hematuria, fistula, and ureteral obstruction with or without hydroureter or hydronephrosis, reflect local organ involvement.
    • The triad of leg edema, pain, and hydronephrosis suggests pelvic wall involvement.
  • The common sites for distant metastasis include extrapelvic lymph nodes, liver, lung, and bone.

Physical

  • In patients with early-stage cervical cancer, physical examination findings can be relatively normal.
  • As the disease progresses, the cervix may become abnormal in appearance, with gross erosion, ulcer, or mass. These abnormalities can extend to the vagina.
  • Rectal examination may reveal an external mass or gross blood from tumor erosion.
  • Bimanual examination findings often reveal pelvic metastasis.
  • Leg edema suggests lymphatic/vascular obstruction from tumor.
  • If the disease involves the liver, hepatomegaly may develop.
  • Pulmonary metastasis usually is difficult to detect upon physical examination unless pleural effusion or bronchial obstruction becomes apparent.

Causes

Early epidemiological data demonstrated a direct causal relationship between cervical cancer and sexual activity. Major risk factors observed include sex at a young age, multiple sexual partners, promiscuous male partners, and history of sexually transmitted diseases. However, the search for a potential sexually transmitted carcinogen was unsuccessful until breakthroughs in molecular biology enabled scientists to detect viral genome in cervical cells.

Strong evidence now implicates human papillomaviruses (HPVs) as prime suspects. HPV viral DNA has been detected in more than 90% of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) and invasive cervical cancers compared with a consistently lower percentage in controls. Both animal data and molecular biologic evidence confirm the malignant transformation potential of papilloma virus–induced lesions. SILs are found predominantly in younger women, while invasive cancers are detected more often in women 10-15 years older, suggesting slow progression of cancer.

HPV infection occurs in a high percentage of sexually active women. Most of these infections clear spontaneously within months to a few years, and only a small proportion progress to cancer. This means that other crucial factors must be involved in the process of carcinogenesis.

Three main factors have been postulated to influence the progression of low-grade SILs to high-grade SILs. These include the type and duration of viral infection, with high-risk HPV type and persistent infection predicting a higher risk for progression; host conditions that compromise immunity, such as multiparity or poor nutritional status; and environmental factors such as smoking, oral contraceptive use, or vitamin deficiencies. In addition, various gynecologic factors, including age of menarche, age of first intercourse, and number of sexual partners, significantly increase the risk for cervical cancer.

  • Human papillomavirus
    • HPV is a heterogeneous group of viruses that contain closed circular double-stranded DNA. The viral genome encodes 6 early open reading frame proteins (ie, E1, E2, E3, E4, E6, E7), which function as regulatory proteins, and 2 late open reading frame proteins (ie, L1, L2), which make up the viral capsid.
    • To date, 77 different genotypes of HPV have been identified and cloned, among which, types 6, 11, 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 42, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68 have the propensity to infect anogenital tissues.
    • The HPVs that infect the human cervix fall into 2 broad categories. The low-risk types, HPV 6b and 11, are associated with low-grade SILs but are never found in invasive cancer. The high-risk types, mostly HPV 16 and 18, are found in 50-80% of SILs and in up to 90% of invasive cancers. Although less common, types 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82 should also be considered carcinogenic.
    • The major difference between the 2 types is that after infection, the low-risk HPVs are maintained as extrachromosomal DNA episomes, while the high-risk HPV genome is found integrated into the host cellular DNA. The recombination event often leaves E6 and E7 directly coupled to the viral promoter and enhancer sequences, allowing their continued expression after integration. Because E7 binds and inactivates the Rb protein while E6 binds p53 and directs its degradation, the functional loss of both TP53 and the RB genes leads to resistance to apoptosis, causing uncensored cell growth after DNA damage. This ultimately results in progression to malignancy.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus
    • The role of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer is not fully understood. Studies have shown a higher prevalence of HPV in HIV-seropositive women than in seronegative women, and the HPV prevalence was directly proportional to the severity of immunosuppression as measured by CD4 counts.
    • Impaired lymphocyte function has been postulated to enhance latent or subclinical HPV activity, resulting in a higher rate of persistent infection.
    • Whether HIV has a synergistic effect on HPV infection, either by direct molecular interaction or through an indirect immunologic effect, remains unclear.

More on Cervical Cancer

Overview: Cervical Cancer
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Cervical Cancer
Treatment & Medication: Cervical Cancer
Follow-up: Cervical Cancer
Multimedia: Cervical Cancer
References

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009.

  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer v.1 2009. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2009.

  3. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. May 2009;105(2):107-8. [Medline].

  4. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. Apr 24 2002;287(16):2114-9. [Medline].

  5. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cervix uteri. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002:259-65.

  6. Beiner ME, Hauspy J, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, Nofech-Mozes S, et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study. Gynecol Oncol. Aug 2008;110(2):168-71. [Medline].

  7. Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. May 1999;73(2):177-83. [Medline].

  8. Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. Apr 2000;18(8):1606-13. [Medline][Full Text].

  9. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1137-43. [Medline].

  10. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1144-53. [Medline].

  11. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1154-61. [Medline].

  12. Long HJ 3rd, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr, Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2005;23(21):4626-33. [Medline].

  13. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Cervical Cancer. AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/USpstf/uspscerv.htm. Accessed August 25, 2009.

  14. [Guideline] Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2009;59(1):27-41. [Medline][Full Text].

  15. [Guideline] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 61, April 2005. Human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2005;105(4):905-18. [Medline].

  16. Anhang R, Goodman A, Goldie SJ. HPV communication: review of existing research and recommendations for patient education. CA Cancer J Clin. Sep-Oct 2004;54(5):248-59. [Medline].

  17. Arends MJ, Wyllie AH, Bird CC. Papillomaviruses and human cancer. Hum Pathol. Jul 1990;21(7):686-98. [Medline].

  18. Clavel C, Masure M, Bory JP, et al. Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women. Br J Cancer. Jun 15 2001;84(12):1616-23. [Medline].

  19. Gardasil. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM094042. Accessed August 25, 2009.

  20. Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, Herrero R, Alfaro M, Bratti MC. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer. Apr 25 1999;87(2):48-55. [Medline].

  21. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2007;57(1):43-66. [Medline].

  22. Koutsky LA, Ault KA, Wheeler CM, et al. A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. N Engl J Med. Nov 21 2002;347(21):1645-51. [Medline].

  23. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Feb 6 2003;348(6):518-27. [Medline].

  24. Omura GA, Blessing JA, Vaccarello L. Randomized trial of cisplatin versus cisplatin plus mitolactol versus cisplatin plus ifosfamide in advanced squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1997;15(1):165-71. [Medline].

  25. Park TW, Fujiwara H, Wright TC. Molecular biology of cervical cancer and its precursors. Cancer. Nov 15 1995;76(10 Suppl):1902-13. [Medline].

  26. Saslow D, Castle PE, Cox JT, Davey DD, Einstein MH, Ferris DG, et al. American Cancer Society Guideline for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine use to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2007;57(1):7-28. [Medline].

  27. Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jun 16 1993;85(12):958-64. [Medline].

  28. Solomon D, Breen N, McNeel T. Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2007;57(2):105-11. [Medline].

  29. The ALTS group. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Les. J Natl Cancer Inst. Mar 1 2000;92(5):397-402. [Medline].

  30. Thigpen JT, Vance R, Puneky L. Chemotherapy as a palliative treatment in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Semin Oncol. Apr 1995;22(2 Suppl 3):16-24. [Medline].

  31. Wong JG, Feussner JR. Screening for cervical cancer. Pap smears can save lives. N C Med J. Jul 1993;54(7):342-5. [Medline].

  32. Wright TC, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. Apr 24 2002;287(16):2120-9. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

cervical cancer, cervix cancer, cervical cancer symptoms, cervical cancer treatment, human papillomavirus, HPV cervical cancer, cervical neoplasms, uterine cervical cancer, sexually transmitted disease, STD, vaginal cancer, vagina cancer, Papanicolaou tests, Pap smear, gynecological cancer, gynecologic cancer

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Agustin A Garcia, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine
Agustin A Garcia, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

John J Kavanagh Jr, MD, Chief, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gynecological and Medical Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas College of Medicine
John J Kavanagh Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association for the History of Medicine, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research, American Medical Association, Society of Gynecologist Oncologists, Southern Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

A David Barnes, MD, PhD, MPH, FACOG, Consulting Staff, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mammoth Hospital, Mammoth Lakes, California, Pioneer Valley Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, Warren General Hospital, Warren, Pennsylvania and Mountain West Hospital, Tooele, Utah
A David Barnes, MD, PhD, MPH, FACOG is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Forensic Examiners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, and Utah Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center
Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michel E Rivlin, MD, Professor, Coordinator of Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
Michel E Rivlin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Mississippi State Medical Association, and Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.