Background
Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy in women worldwide, and it remains a leading cause of cancer-related death for women in developing countries. In the United States, cervical cancer is relatively uncommon. (See Epidemiology.)
The incidence of invasive cervical cancer has declined steadily in the United States over the past few decades; however, it continues to rise in many developing countries. The change in the epidemiological trend in the United States has been attributed to mass screening with Papanicolaou tests. Furthermore, cervical cancer is a preventable disease, primarily with newly approved human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and secondarily through treatment of preinvasive disease.
Papanicolaou test screening is recommended in women who meet screening criteria, regardless of symptoms. However, symptoms, abnormal Papanicolaou test results, or women with a gross lesion of the cervix are best evaluated with colposcopy and biopsy. For further recommendations concerning cervical cancer screening, evaluation and management of abnormal Papanicolaou test results, and treatment of cervicalintraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1, see the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) guidelines.[1] Also see Clinical and Workup.
The treatment of cervical cancer varies with the stage of the disease. For early invasive cancer, surgery is the treatment of choice. In more advanced cases, radiation combined with chemotherapy is the current standard of care. In patients with disseminated disease, chemotherapy or radiation provides symptom palliation. (See Treatment.)
Etiology
Early epidemiological data demonstrated a clear association between cervical cancer and sexual activity. Major risk factors observed were sex at a young age, multiple sexual partners, promiscuous male partners, and history of sexually transmitted diseases. However, the search for a potential sexually transmitted carcinogen was unsuccessful until breakthroughs in molecular biology enabled scientists to detect viral genome in cervical cells.
Strong evidence now implicates human papillomaviruses (HPVs) as prime suspects.[2, 3, 4] HPV viral DNA has been detected in more than 90% of premalignant and malignant cervical lesions compared with a consistently lower percentage in controls. Both animal data and molecular biologic evidence confirm the malignant transformation potential of papilloma virus–induced lesions. Squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) are found predominantly in younger women, while invasive cancers are detected more often in women 10-15 years older, suggesting slow progression of cancer.
HPV infection occurs in a high percentage of sexually active women. Most of these infections clear spontaneously within months to a few years, and only a small proportion progress to cancer. This means that other crucial factors must be involved in the process of carcinogenesis.
Three main factors have been postulated to influence the progression of low-grade SILs to high-grade SILs. These include the type and duration of viral infection, with high-risk HPV type and persistent infection predicting a higher risk for progression; host conditions that compromise immunity, such as multiparity or poor nutritional status; and environmental factors such as smoking, oral contraceptive use, or vitamin deficiencies.
In addition, various gynecologic factors significantly increase the risk for cervical cancer. These include early age of first intercourse and higher number of sexual partners.
Human papillomavirus
HPV is a heterogeneous group of viruses that contain closed circular double-stranded DNA. The viral genome encodes 6 early open reading frame proteins (ie, E1, E2, E3, E4, E6, E7), which function as regulatory proteins, and 2 late open reading frame proteins (ie, L1, L2), which make up the viral capsid.
To date, 77 different genotypes of HPV have been identified and cloned, among which types 6, 11, 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 42, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68 have the propensity to infect anogenital tissues.
The HPVs that infect the human cervix fall into 2 broad risk categories. The low-risk types, HPV 6b and 11, are associated with low-grade SILs but are never found in invasive cancer. The high-risk types, mostly HPV 16 and 18, are found in 50-80% of SILs and in up to 90% of invasive cancers. Although less common, types 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82 should also be considered carcinogenic.
The major difference between the 2 types is that after infection, the low-risk HPVs are maintained as extrachromosomal DNA episomes, while the high-risk HPV genome is found integrated into the host cellular DNA. The recombination event often leaves E6 and E7 directly coupled to the viral promoter and enhancer sequences, allowing their continued expression after integration.
Because E7 binds and inactivates the Rb protein while E6 binds p53 and directs its degradation, the functional loss of both TP53 and the RB genes leads to resistance to apoptosis, causing uncensored cell growth after DNA damage. This ultimately results in progression to malignancy.
Human immunodeficiency virus
The role of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer is not fully understood. Studies have shown a higher prevalence of HPV infection in HIV-seropositive women than in seronegative women, and the HPV prevalence was directly proportional to the severity of immunosuppression as measured by CD4 counts.
Impaired lymphocyte function has been postulated to enhance latent or subclinical HPV activity, resulting in a higher rate of persistent infection. Whether HIV has a synergistic effect on HPV infection, either by direct molecular interaction or through an indirect immunologic effect, remains unclear.
Epidemiology
Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy in women worldwide, and it remains a leading cause of cancer-related death for women in developing countries. In the United States, cervical cancer is relatively uncommon. The incidence of invasive cervical cancer has declined steadily in the United States over the past few decades; however, it continues to rise in many developing countries. The change in the epidemiological trend in the United States has been attributed to mass screening with Papanicolaou tests.[5]
The American Cancer Society estimated that in the United States in 2010, 12,200 new cases of cervical cancer would be diagnosed.[6] In addition, more than 50,000 cases of carcinoma in situ are diagnosed each year. Internationally, 500,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. Unlike the United States, where the annual incidence is 6.8 cases or less per 100,000 women, rates in parts of South America and Africa range as high as 52.8 cases per 100,000 women.[7]
Forouzanfar et al performed annual age-specific assessments of cervical cancer in 187 countries from 1980-2010. The global cervical cancer incidence increased from 378,000 cases per year in 1980 to 454,000 cases per year in 2010 (annual rate of increase, 0.6%). Cervical cancer death rates have been decreasing, but the disease still accounted for 200,000 deaths in 2010; 46,000 of these women were aged 15-49 years in developing countries.[8]
Race- and age-related demographics
In the United States, cervical cancer is more common in Hispanic, African American, and Native American women than in white women. Additionally, women of these races also have higher mortality from cervical cancers compared with their white counterparts. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Surveillance of Screening-Detected Cancers (Colon and Rectum, Breast, and Cervix)—United States, 2004–2006 reported that incidence rates of late-stage cervical cancer were highest among women aged 50-79 years and Hispanics.[9] However, cervical cancer may be diagnosed in any woman of reproductive age.
Prognosis
Prognosis of cervical cancer depends on disease stage. In general, the 5-year survival rates are as follows:
- Stage I - Greater than 90%
- Stage II - 60-80%
- Stage III - Approximately 50%
- Stage IV - Less than 30%
The American Cancer Society estimated that 4,210 women would die of cervical cancer in the United States in 2010.[6] This represents 1.3% of all cancer deaths and 6.5% of deaths from gynecologic cancers.
Patient Education
Cervical cancer is overrepresented among underserved and minority groups in the United States. It is imperative to increase awareness about the benefits of Papanicolaou test screening in these groups.
A Cochrane review found that the best approach to encourage women to undergo cervical screening involved invitations, such as fixed or open appointments, letters, telephone calls, verbal recommendations, prompts, and follow-up letters.[10] However, these findings relate to screening in developed countries, and their relevance to developing countries is unclear. Further studies are required to determine the effectiveness of promising interventions, such as revealing in an invitation letter the gender of the smear taker, using a health promotion nurse, the use of lay outreach health workers, and intensive attempts at recruitment.
For patient education information, see the Cancer and Tumors Center, Women's Health Center, and Procedures Center, as well as Cervical Cancer, Pap Smear, and Colposcopy.
American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. 2006 Consensus Guidelines. Available at http://www.asccp.org/ConsensusGuidelines/tabid/7436/Default.aspx. Accessed August 18, 2011.
[Guideline] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 61, April 2005. Human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2005;105(4):905-18. [Medline].
Arends MJ, Wyllie AH, Bird CC. Papillomaviruses and human cancer. Hum Pathol. Jul 1990;21(7):686-98. [Medline].
Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jun 16 1993;85(12):958-64. [Medline].
Solomon D, Breen N, McNeel T. Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2007;57(2):105-11. [Medline].
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009.
World Health Organization. WHO/ICO Information Centre on Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Cervical Cancer. Available at http://www.who.int/hpvcentre/statistics/en/.. Accessed April 2, 2011.
Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. Oct 22 2011;378(9801):1461-84. [Medline].
Henley SJ, King JB, German RR, Richardson LC, Plescia M. Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) - United States, 2004-2006. MMWR Surveill Summ. Nov 26 2010;59(9):1-25. [Medline].
Everett T, Bryant A, Griffin MF, et al. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. May 11 2011;5:CD002834. [Medline].
Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. May 2009;105(2):107-8. [Medline].
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Cervical Cancer. AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/USpstf/uspscerv.htm. Accessed August 25, 2009.
[Guideline] Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2009;59(1):27-41. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Hoover RN, Hyer M, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. N Engl J Med. Oct 6 2011;365(14):1304-14. [Medline].
Zhao FH, Lin MJ, Chen F, et al. Performance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing as a primary screen for cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 17 population-based studies from China. Lancet Oncol. Dec 2010;11(12):1160-71. [Medline].
Marks M, Gravitt PE, Gupta SB, et al. The association of hormonal contraceptive use and HPV prevalence. Int J Cancer. Jun 15 2011;128(12):2962-70. [Medline].
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer v.1 2009. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2009.
Chen YB, Hu CM, Chen GL, Hu D, Liao J. Staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. Oct 2011;36(5):619-26. [Medline].
Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. Apr 24 2002;287(16):2114-9. [Medline].
American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cervix uteri. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002:259-65.
Beiner ME, Hauspy J, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, Nofech-Mozes S, et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study. Gynecol Oncol. Aug 2008;110(2):168-71. [Medline].
Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. May 2009;113(2):191-4. [Medline].
Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS. Jul-Sep 2008;12(3):227-37. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol. May 2010;117(2):260-5. [Medline].
Shah M, Lewin SN, Deutsch I, et al. Therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Cancer. Jan 15 2011;117(2):310-7. [Medline].
Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. May 1999;73(2):177-83. [Medline].
Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. Apr 2000;18(8):1606-13. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1137-43. [Medline].
Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1144-53. [Medline].
Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1154-61. [Medline].
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer v.1 2011. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf. Accessed April 14th, 2011.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Number 35, May 2002. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jul 2002;78(1):79-91. [Medline].
Long HJ 3rd, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr, Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2005;23(21):4626-33. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS, Cohn DE, Ramondetta LM, Boardman CH, et al. Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1 2009;27(28):4649-55. [Medline].
Berek JS, Howe C, Lagasse LD, Hacker NF. Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: survival and morbidity analysis of the 45-year experience at UCLA. Gynecol Oncol. Oct 2005;99(1):153-9. [Medline].
Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, Smith HO, Anderson PS, Fields AL. Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Experience (1987 to 2003). Gynecol Oncol. May 2006;101(2):261-8. [Medline].
Moore DH. Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. Jan 2008;6(1):53-7. [Medline].
Moore DH, Blessing JA, McQuellon RP, et al. Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. Aug 1 2004;22(15):3113-9. [Medline].
Moore KN, Herzog TJ, Lewin S, et al. A comparison of cisplatin/paclitaxel and carboplatin/paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. May 2007;105(2):299-303. [Medline].
Gardasil. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM094042. Accessed August 25, 2009.
Saslow D, Castle PE, Cox JT, Davey DD, Einstein MH, Ferris DG, et al. American Cancer Society Guideline for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine use to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2007;57(1):7-28. [Medline].
Littell RD, Kinney W, Fetterman B, et al. Risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women aged 30 years and older with an HPV-negative low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion screening result. J Low Genit Tract Dis. Jan 2011;15(1):54-9. [Medline].
Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJ, Berkhof J, et al. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol. May 2011;12(5):441-50. [Medline].
[Guideline] FDA licensure of bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV2, Cervarix) for use in females and updated HPV vaccination recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. May 28 2010;59(20):626-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
| TNM Stage | FIGO Stage | |
| Tx | - | Primary tumor cannot be assessed |
| T0 | - | No evidence of primary tumor |
| Tis | 0 | Carcinoma in situ |
| T1 | I | Cervical carcinoma confined to uterus (extension to corpus should be disregarded) |
| T1a | IA | Invasive carcinoma diagnosed only by microscopy. All macroscopically visible lesions--even with superficial invasion--are T1b/1B. Stromal invasion with a maximal depth of 5.0 mm measured from the base of the epithelium and a horizontal spread of 7.0 mm or less. Vascular space involvement, venous or lymphatic, does not affect classification. |
| T1a1 | IA1 | Measured stromal invasion 3 mm or less in depth and 7 mm or less in lateral spread |
| T1a2 | IA2 | Measured stromal invasion more than 3 mm but not more than 5 mm with a horizontal spread 7 mm or less |
| T1b | IB | Clinically visible lesion confined to the cervix or microscopic lesion greater than IA2 |
| T1b1 | IB1 | Clinically visible lesion 4 cm or less in greatest dimension |
| IB2 | Clinically visible lesion more than 4 cm | |
| T2 | II | Cervical carcinoma invades beyond uterus but not to pelvic wall or to the lower third of vagina |
| T2a | IIA | Tumor without parametrial invasion |
| T2b | IIB | Tumor with parametrial invasion |
| T3 | III | Tumor extends to the pelvic wall and/or involves the lower third of the vagina and/or causes hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney |
| T3a | IIIA | Tumor involves lower third of vagina; no extension to pelvic wall |
| T3b | IIIB | Tumor extends to pelvic wall and/or causes hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney |
| - | IV | Cervical carcinoma has extended beyond the true pelvis or has involved (biopsy proven) the bladder mucosa or rectal mucosa. Bullous edema does not qualify as a criteria for stage IV disease. |
| T4 | IVA | Spread to adjacent organs (bladder, rectum, or both) |
| M1 | IVB | Distant metastasis |
| Stage | Tumor | Node | Metastasis |
| 0 | Tis | N0 | M0 |
| IA1 | T1a1 | N0 | M0 |
| IA2 | T1a2 | N0 | M0 |
| IB1 | T1b1 | N0 | M0 |
| IIA | T2a | N0 | M0 |
| IIB | T2b | N0 | M0 |
| IIIA | T3a | N0 | M0 |
| IIIB | T1 | N1 | M0 |
| - | T2 | N1 | M0 |
| - | T3a | N1 | M0 |
| - | T3b | Any N | M0 |
| IVA | T4 | Any N | M0 |
| IVB | Any T | Any N | M1 |

