Cervical Cancer Treatment & Management

  • Author: Cecelia H Boardman, MD; Chief Editor: Warner K Huh, MD   more...
 
Updated: Mar 28, 2012
 

Approach Considerations

The treatment of cervical cancer varies with the stage of the disease. For early invasive cancer, surgery is the treatment of choice. In more advanced cases, radiation combined with chemotherapy is the current standard of care. In patients with disseminated disease, chemotherapy or radiation provides symptom palliation.

Next

Management of Stage 0 Cancer

Carcinoma in situ (stage 0) is treated with local ablative or extricative measures such as cryosurgery, laser ablation, and loop excision. Surgical removal is preferred to allow for further pathologic evaluation in order to rule out microinvasive disease. Hysterectomy should be reserved for patients with other gynecologic indications to justify the procedure. After local treatment, these patients require lifelong surveillance.

Previous
Next

Management of Stage IA1 Cancer

The treatment of choice for stage IA1 disease is surgery. Total hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, and conization are accepted procedures. Lymph node dissection is not required if the depth of invasion is less than 3 mm and no lymphovascular invasion is noted.

Selected patients with stage IA1 disease but no lymphovascular space invasion who desire to maintain fertility may have a therapeutic conization with close follow-up, including cytology, colposcopy, and endocervical curettage. Patients with medical comorbidities who are not surgical candidates can be successfully treated with radiation.

According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, pelvic radiation therapy is currently a category 1 recommendation for women with stage IA disease and negative lymph nodes after surgery who have high-risk factors, including large primary tumor, deep stromal invasion and/or lymphovascular space invasion.[16]

Previous
Next

Management of Stage IA2, IB, or IIA Cancer

For patients with stage IB or IIA disease, treatment options are either combined external beam radiation with brachytherapy or radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is appropriate for fertility preservation in women with stage IA2 disease, and those with stage IB1 disease whose lesions are 2 cm or smaller.[16]

Most retrospective studies have shown equivalent survival rates for both procedures, although such studies usually are flawed because of patient selection bias and other compounding factors. However, a recent study showed identical overall and disease-free survival rates.[20]

Current surgical guidelines for stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancers now allow for minimally invasive techniques such as traditional laparoscopic and robotically assisted laparoscopic techniques in the surgical management of these tumors. Indeed, it has been shown that these less morbid procedures are equally as effective in gaining adequate surgical margins and lymph node dissection, while gaining the added advantage of less surgical recovery time.[21, 22, 23]

Analysis of women who underwent radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, revealed that patients with node-negative, early stage cervical cancer who underwent a more extensive lymphadenectomy had improved survival.[24] Compared with patients who had fewer than 10 nodes removed, patients with 21-30 nodes removed were 24% less likely to die, and those with greater than 30 nodes removed were 37% less likely to die from their tumors.

Quality-of-life data, particularly in the psychosexual area, is relatively scant.

Postoperative radiation to the pelvis decreases the risk of local recurrence in patients with high-risk factors (positive pelvic nodes, positive surgical margins, and residual parametrial disease).[25] A randomized trial showed that patients with parametrial involvement, positive pelvic nodes, or positive surgical margins benefit from a postoperative combination of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and pelvic radiation.[26]

Postoperative radiation is also recommended in patients who have at least 2 intermediate risk factors, to include tumor size greater than 2 cm, deep stromal invasion, or lymphovascular space invasion. For patients with IB2 or IIA and tumors larger than 4 cm, radiation and chemotherapy is selected in most cases. There are risks associated with combined-modality therapy, but many of these patients will meet either intermediate- or high-risk criteria after radical hysterectomy.

Previous
Next

Management of Stage IIB-IVA Cancer

For locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, III, and IVA), radiation therapy was the treatment of choice for many years. Radiation therapy begins with a course of external beam radiation to reduce tumor mass to enable subsequent intracavitary application. Brachytherapy is delivered using afterloading applicators that are placed in the uterine cavity and vagina.

Additionally, the results from large, well-conducted, prospective randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a dramatic improvement in survival with the combined use of chemotherapy and radiation.[27, 28, 29] Consequently, the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in combination with radiation has become the standard of care for primary management of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.[16]

Previous
Next

Management of Stage IVB and Recurrent Cancer

Individualized therapy is used on a palliative basis. Radiation is used alone for control of bleeding and pain symptoms, while systemic chemotherapy is used for disseminated disease.[30] For recurrent disease, the choice of therapy is influenced by prior treatments.

Treatment of pelvic recurrences after primary surgical management should include single-agent chemotherapy and radiation, while treatment for recurrences elsewhere should include combination chemotherapy.[31, 32, 33] For central pelvic recurrence following radiation, modified radical hysterectomy (if recurrence < 2 cm) or pelvic exenteration should be undertaken.[34, 35]

For recurrent disease after chemotherapy and radiation, a disease-free interval of more than 16 months is considered to designate the tumor as platinum sensitive and, therefore, more likely to respond to platinum-based chemotherapy.[36]

Chemotherapy now consists of a platinum-based doublet, as a recent Gynecologic Oncology Group study compared the use of single-agent cisplatin versus the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel for stage IVB cervical cancer in a randomized phase III study and found the combination to be superior to the single agent cisplatin.[37] Recent phase III trials have also shown that paclitaxel/cisplatin therapy is now considered the standard of care.[32, 33, 37, 38] The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) also recommends bevacizumab, docetaxel, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin, irinotecan, and topotecan as possible candidates for second-line therapy (category 2B recommendation), as well as pemetrexed and vinorelbine (category 3 recommendation). In addition, it should be noted that bevacizumab as single-agent therapy is also acceptable.[30]

For recurrences in a previously irradiated field or for a disease-free interval of less than 16 months, a recurrence is less likely to respond to subsequent therapies, and these patients should be strongly encouraged to participate in clinical trials.

Special efforts should be made to ensure comprehensive palliative care, including adequate pain control, for these patients.

Previous
Next

Complications of Radiation Therapy

During the acute phase of pelvic radiation therapy, the surrounding normal tissues such as the intestines, the bladder, and the perineum skin often are affected. Acute adverse GI effects include diarrhea, abdominal cramping, rectal discomfort, or bleeding. Diarrhea usually is controlled by either loperamide (Imodium) or atropine sulfate (Lomotil). Small, steroid-containing enemas are prescribed to alleviate symptoms from proctitis.

Cystourethritis also can occur, which leads to dysuria, frequency, and nocturia. Antispasmodics often are helpful for symptom relief. Urine should be examined for possible infection. If urinary tract infection is diagnosed, therapy should be instituted without delay.

Proper skin hygiene should be maintained for the perineum, and topical lotion should be used if erythema or desquamation occurs.

Late sequelae of radiation usually appear 1-4 years after treatment. The major sequelae include rectal or vaginal stenosis, small bowel obstruction, malabsorption, and chronic cystitis.

Previous
Next

Complications From Surgery

The most frequent complication of radical hysterectomy is urinary dysfunction as a result of partial denervation of the detrusor muscle. Other complications include foreshortened vagina, ureterovaginal fistula, hemorrhage, infection, bowel obstruction, stricture and fibrosis of the intestine or rectosigmoid colon, and bladder and rectovaginal fistulas.

Previous
Next

Other Procedures

Invasive procedures such as nephrostomy or diverting colostomy sometimes are performed in this group of patients to improve their quality of life. Total pelvic exenteration may be considered in patients with an isolated central pelvic recurrence.

Previous
Next

Nutrition

Proper nutrition is important for patients with cervical cancer. Every attempt should be made to encourage and provide adequate oral food intake.

Nutritional supplements such as Ensure or Boost are used when patients have had significant weight loss or cannot tolerate regular food due to nausea caused by radiation or chemotherapy. In patients with severe anorexia, appetite stimulants such as megestrol (Megace) can be prescribed.

For patients who are unable to tolerate any oral intake, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes are placed for nutritional supplementation. In patients with extensive bowel obstruction as a result of metastatic cancer, hyperalimentation sometimes is used.

Previous
Next

Prevention of Human Papillomavirus Infection

Several measures are effective to prevent HPV infection and hence prevent cervical cancer. Sexual abstinence or barrier protection and/or spermicidal gels during sexual intercourse are protective. Evidence suggests that HPV vaccines prevent HPV infection. A vaccine for HPV, Gardasil, is approved by the FDA for girls and women 9 to 26 years of age for prevention of cervical cancer caused by HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18.[39]

The ACS recommends routine HPV vaccination for girls 11-12 years old; catch up vaccination or completion of the vaccination series can be conducted up to age 18 years. The ACS found insufficient data to recommend for or against universal HPV vaccination in women 19-26 years of age, and the ACS recommends against vaccination after age 26 years. Screening for cervical cancer should continue in vaccinated women, following the same guidelines as in unvaccinated women.[40]

Previous
Next

Consultations

The treatment of cervical cancer frequently requires a multidisciplinary approach. Involvement of a gynecologic oncologist, radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist may be necessary.

Previous
Next

Long-Term Monitoring

A study by Littell et al suggests that women older than 30 years with high-risk, HPV-negative low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) have a low risk of CIN.[41] A 1-year follow-up colposcopy should be considered when CIN occurs in routine practice.

Residual or recurrent CIN grade 2 or 3 cervical cancer develops in 15% of women treated for high-grade CIN. Kocken et al suggest that the 5-year risk of posttreatment CIN grade 2 or higher in women with 3 consecutive negative cytological smears or negative co-testing for cytology and hrHPV at 6 and 24 months was similar to that of women with normal cytology. This may justify routine-to-regular screening.[42]

Previous
Proceed to Medication
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Cecelia H Boardman, MD  The Dianne Harris Wright Professorship for Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Research, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center; Associate Professor (Collateral), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine

Cecelia H Boardman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Surgeons, Minnesota Medical Association, and Society of Gynecologist Oncologists

Disclosure: Merck Salary Speaking and teaching; Glaxo Salary Speaking and teaching; Depuy Salary Speaking and teaching

Coauthor(s)

Kirk J Matthews Jr, MD  Resident Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Warner K Huh, MD  Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Senior Scientist, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama School of Medicine

Warner K Huh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Surgeons, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Massachusetts Medical Society, and Society of Gynecologist Oncologists

Disclosure: MERCK Consulting fee Consulting; ROCHE PHARMA/DIAGNOSTICS Consulting fee Consulting; INTUITIVE SURGICAL Proctor Fee Consulting; Qiagen Consulting fee Consulting

Additional Contributors

A David Barnes, MD, PhD, MPH, FACOG Consulting Staff, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mammoth Hospital (Mammoth Lakes, California), Pioneer Valley Hospital (Salt Lake City, Utah), Warren General Hospital (Warren, Pennsylvania), and Mountain West Hospital (Tooele, Utah)

A David Barnes, MD, PhD, MPH, FACOG is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Forensic Examiners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, and Utah Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Anthony El-Khoueiry, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine, Clinical Instructor, Division of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Agustin A Garcia, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Omid Hamid, MD Associate Director of Melanoma Center, Medical Director of Neuro-oncology Clinic, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John J Kavanagh Jr MD, Chief, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gynecological and Medical Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas Medical School at Houston

John J Kavanagh Jr is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association for the History of Medicine, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research, American Medical Association, Society of Gynecologist Oncologists, Southern Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References
  1. American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. 2006 Consensus Guidelines. Available at http://www.asccp.org/ConsensusGuidelines/tabid/7436/Default.aspx. Accessed August 18, 2011.

  2. [Guideline] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 61, April 2005. Human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2005;105(4):905-18. [Medline].

  3. Arends MJ, Wyllie AH, Bird CC. Papillomaviruses and human cancer. Hum Pathol. Jul 1990;21(7):686-98. [Medline].

  4. Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jun 16 1993;85(12):958-64. [Medline].

  5. Solomon D, Breen N, McNeel T. Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2007;57(2):105-11. [Medline].

  6. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009.

  7. World Health Organization. WHO/ICO Information Centre on Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Cervical Cancer. Available at http://www.who.int/hpvcentre/statistics/en/.. Accessed April 2, 2011.

  8. Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. Oct 22 2011;378(9801):1461-84. [Medline].

  9. Henley SJ, King JB, German RR, Richardson LC, Plescia M. Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) - United States, 2004-2006. MMWR Surveill Summ. Nov 26 2010;59(9):1-25. [Medline].

  10. Everett T, Bryant A, Griffin MF, et al. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. May 11 2011;5:CD002834. [Medline].

  11. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. May 2009;105(2):107-8. [Medline].

  12. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar 14 2012;[Medline].

  13. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Cervical Cancer. March 2012. Available at http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspscerv.htm. Accessed March 28, 2012.

  14. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 2009;114(6):1409-20. [Medline].

  15. Marks M, Gravitt PE, Gupta SB, et al. The association of hormonal contraceptive use and HPV prevalence. Int J Cancer. Jun 15 2011;128(12):2962-70. [Medline].

  16. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer v.1 2009. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2009.

  17. Chen YB, Hu CM, Chen GL, Hu D, Liao J. Staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. Oct 2011;36(5):619-26. [Medline].

  18. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. Apr 24 2002;287(16):2114-9. [Medline].

  19. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cervix uteri. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002:259-65.

  20. Beiner ME, Hauspy J, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, Nofech-Mozes S, et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study. Gynecol Oncol. Aug 2008;110(2):168-71. [Medline].

  21. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. May 2009;113(2):191-4. [Medline].

  22. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS. Jul-Sep 2008;12(3):227-37. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  23. Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol. May 2010;117(2):260-5. [Medline].

  24. Shah M, Lewin SN, Deutsch I, et al. Therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Cancer. Jan 15 2011;117(2):310-7. [Medline].

  25. Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. May 1999;73(2):177-83. [Medline].

  26. Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. Apr 2000;18(8):1606-13. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  27. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1137-43. [Medline].

  28. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1144-53. [Medline].

  29. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1154-61. [Medline].

  30. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer v.1 2011. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf. Accessed April 14th, 2011.

  31. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Number 35, May 2002. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jul 2002;78(1):79-91. [Medline].

  32. Long HJ 3rd, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr, Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2005;23(21):4626-33. [Medline].

  33. [Best Evidence] Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS, Cohn DE, Ramondetta LM, Boardman CH, et al. Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1 2009;27(28):4649-55. [Medline].

  34. Berek JS, Howe C, Lagasse LD, Hacker NF. Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: survival and morbidity analysis of the 45-year experience at UCLA. Gynecol Oncol. Oct 2005;99(1):153-9. [Medline].

  35. Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, Smith HO, Anderson PS, Fields AL. Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Experience (1987 to 2003). Gynecol Oncol. May 2006;101(2):261-8. [Medline].

  36. Moore DH. Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. Jan 2008;6(1):53-7. [Medline].

  37. Moore DH, Blessing JA, McQuellon RP, et al. Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. Aug 1 2004;22(15):3113-9. [Medline].

  38. Moore KN, Herzog TJ, Lewin S, et al. A comparison of cisplatin/paclitaxel and carboplatin/paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. May 2007;105(2):299-303. [Medline].

  39. Gardasil. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM094042. Accessed August 25, 2009.

  40. Saslow D, Castle PE, Cox JT, Davey DD, Einstein MH, Ferris DG, et al. American Cancer Society Guideline for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine use to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2007;57(1):7-28. [Medline].

  41. Littell RD, Kinney W, Fetterman B, et al. Risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women aged 30 years and older with an HPV-negative low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion screening result. J Low Genit Tract Dis. Jan 2011;15(1):54-9. [Medline].

  42. Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJ, Berkhof J, et al. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol. May 2011;12(5):441-50. [Medline].

  43. [Guideline] FDA licensure of bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV2, Cervarix) for use in females and updated HPV vaccination recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. May 28 2010;59(20):626-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  44. Hoover RN, Hyer M, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. N Engl J Med. Oct 6 2011;365(14):1304-14. [Medline].

  45. Koliopoulos G, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Kyrgiou M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Gynecol Oncol. Jan 2007;104(1):232-46. [Medline].

  46. Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. May 16 2000;132(10):810-9. [Medline].

  47. [Guideline] Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2009;59(1):27-41. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  48. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Cervical Cancer. AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/USpstf/uspscerv.htm. Accessed August 25, 2009.

  49. Zhao FH, Lin MJ, Chen F, et al. Performance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing as a primary screen for cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 17 population-based studies from China. Lancet Oncol. Dec 2010;11(12):1160-71. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Cervical carcinoma with adnexa.
Squamous cell cervical carcinoma.
Table. Summary of 2012 Screening Guidelines from the American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology
ParametersACS Recommendations
Age to start screeningBegin screening with cytology at 21 years old, regardless of sexual history
Screening interval age 21–29Screen with cytology alone every 3 years.* HPV testing should not be used in this age group.
Screening interval age 30-65Screen with a combination of cytology and HPV testing every 5 years (preferred) or cytology alone every 3 years. Screening by HPV testing alone is generally not recommended.*
Age to stop screeningAge 65, if the woman has adequate negative prior screening and is not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer
Screening after hysterectomyNot indicated for women without a cervix and without a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion (eg, CIN2 or CIN3) in the past 20 years or cervical cancer ever
HPV-vaccinated womenScreen according to the same recommendations as for unvaccinated women
These guidelines do not address special populations (eg, women with a history of cervical cancer, women who were exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol, women who are immunocompromised) who may require more intensive or alternative screening.



*If abnormal test results are present, further testing and management should be performed according to the ASCCP Guidelines as noted below under Management of Abnormal Cytology.



Table 1. Cervical Cancer Staging (primary tumor [T])
TNM Stage FIGO Stage
Tx-Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0-No evidence of primary tumor
Tis0Carcinoma in situ
T1ICervical carcinoma confined to uterus (extension to corpus should be disregarded)
T1aIAInvasive carcinoma diagnosed only by microscopy. All macroscopically visible lesions--even with superficial invasion--are T1b/1B. Stromal invasion with a maximal depth of 5.0 mm measured from the base of the epithelium and a horizontal spread of 7.0 mm or less. Vascular space involvement, venous or lymphatic, does not affect classification.
T1a1IA1Measured stromal invasion 3 mm or less in depth and 7 mm or less in lateral spread
T1a2IA2Measured stromal invasion more than 3 mm but not more than 5 mm with a horizontal spread 7 mm or less
T1bIBClinically visible lesion confined to the cervix or microscopic lesion greater than IA2
T1b1IB1Clinically visible lesion 4 cm or less in greatest dimension
IB2Clinically visible lesion more than 4 cm
T2IICervical carcinoma invades beyond uterus but not to pelvic wall or to the lower third of vagina
T2aIIATumor without parametrial invasion
T2bIIBTumor with parametrial invasion
T3IIITumor extends to the pelvic wall and/or involves the lower third of the vagina and/or causes hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney
T3aIIIATumor involves lower third of vagina; no extension to pelvic wall
T3bIIIBTumor extends to pelvic wall and/or causes hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney
-IVCervical carcinoma has extended beyond the true pelvis or has involved (biopsy proven) the bladder mucosa or rectal mucosa. Bullous edema does not qualify as a criteria for stage IV disease.
T4IVASpread to adjacent organs (bladder, rectum, or both)
M1IVBDistant metastasis
Table 2. AJCC Stage Grouping
Stage Tumor Node Metastasis
0TisN0M0
IA1T1a1N0M0
IA2T1a2N0M0
IB1T1b1N0M0
IIAT2aN0M0
IIBT2bN0M0
IIIAT3aN0M0
IIIBT1N1M0
-T2N1M0
-T3aN1M0
-T3bAny NM0
IVAT4Any NM0
IVBAny TAny NM1
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.