Background
Malignant lesions of the ovaries include primary lesions arising from normal structures within the ovary and secondary lesions from cancers arising elsewhere in the body. Primary lesions include epithelial ovarian carcinoma (70% of all ovarian malignancies), germ-cell tumors, sex-cord stromal tumors, and other more rare types. Metastases to the ovaries are relatively frequent, with the most common being from the endometrium, breast, colon, stomach, and cervix. Although many histologic types of ovarian tumors have been described, more than 90% of ovarian malignancies are epithelial tumors. (See Pathophysiology.)
The precise cause of ovarian cancer is unknown, but several risk and contributing factors (including both reproductive and genetic factors) have been identified. (See Etiology.)
Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of cancer death from gynecologic tumors in the United States. Around the world, more than 200,000 women are estimated to develop ovarian cancer every year and about 100,000 die from the disease. The lifetime risk of a woman developing epithelial ovarian cancer is 1 in 70. (See Epidemiology.)
Early disease causes minimal, nonspecific, or no symptoms. Therefore, most cases are diagnosed in an advanced stage. The prognosis of ovarian cancer is closely related to the stage at diagnosis; thus, overall, prognosis for these patients remains poor. (See Clinical Presentation and Prognosis.)
Standard treatment involves aggressive debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. (See Treatment Strategies and Management.)
Pathophysiology
Most theories of the pathophysiology of ovarian cancer include the concept that it begins with the dedifferentiation of the cells overlying the ovary. During ovulation, these cells can be incorporated into the ovary, where they then proliferate. Ovarian cancer typically spreads to the peritoneal surfaces and omentum.
Ovarian carcinoma can spread by local extension, lymphatic invasion, intraperitoneal implantation, hematogenous dissemination, and transdiaphragmatic passage. Intraperitoneal dissemination is the most common and recognized characteristic of ovarian cancer. Malignant cells can implant anywhere in the peritoneal cavity but are more likely to implant in sites of stasis along the peritoneal fluid circulation. As discussed later, these mechanisms of dissemination represent the rationale to conduct surgical staging, debulking surgery, and intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy. In contrast, hematogenous spread is clinically unusual early on in the disease process, although it is not infrequent in patients with advanced disease.
Epithelial ovarian cancer
Epithelial tumors represent the most common histology (90%) of ovarian tumors. Other histologies include the following:
- Sex-cord stromal tumors
- Germ cell tumors
- Primary peritoneal carcinoma
- Metastatic tumors of the ovary
Epithelial ovarian cancer is thought to arise from epithelium covering the ovaries, which is derived from the coelomic epithelium in fetal development. This coelomic epithelium is also involved in formation of the Müllerian ducts, from which the Fallopian tubes, uterus, cervix, and upper vagina develop.
Five main histologic subtypes, which are similar to carcinoma, arise in the epithelial lining of the cervix, uterus, and fallopian tube, as follows:
- Serous (from fallopian tube)
- Endometrioid (endometrium)
- Mucinous (cervix)
- Clear cell (mesonephros)
- Brenner
Some variation is observed in the patterns of spread and disease distribution within the various histologic subtypes.
Epithelial tumors are found as partially cystic lesions with solid components. The surface may be smooth or covered in papillary projections (see the image below), and the cysts contain fluid ranging from straw-colored to opaque brown or hemorrhagic.
An enlarged ovary with a papillary serous carcinoma on the surface. Epithelial ovarian cancer most often spreads initially within the peritoneal cavity (see the images below). Metastatic disease often is found on the peritoneal surfaces, particularly on the undersurface of the diaphragms, the paracolic gutters, the bladder, and the cul-de-sac. Other common sites are the surface of the liver, the mesentery and serosa of the large and small bowel, in the omentum, the uterus, and para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes.
Laparotomy on a patient with intermittent small bowel obstruction. A loop of small bowel (bottom of frame) is adherent to a poorly differentiated primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma (left of frame) that has spread to involve the pelvic sidewall, the bladder peritoneum, the serosa of the uterus, and the fallopian tube.
Metastases from epithelial ovarian carcinoma involving the omentum. Outside the peritoneal cavity, epithelial ovarian cancer may spread to the pleural cavity, lungs, and groin lymph nodes. Presence of pleural effusion does not necessarily indicate disease in the chest, and malignancy can be diagnosed only cytologically. Mucinous tumors tend to form large dominant masses, while papillary serous tumors have a more diffuse distribution and are more commonly bilateral. Endometrioid and clear-cell variants more commonly exhibit local invasion, retroperitoneal disease, and hepatic metastases.
Etiology
The precise cause of ovarian cancer is unknown, but several risk and contributing factors have been identified.
Reproductive factors
Parity is an important risk factor. The risk of epithelial ovarian cancer is increased in women who have not had children and possibly those with early menarche or late menopause. Women who have been pregnant have a 50% decreased risk for developing ovarian cancer compared with nulliparous women. Multiple pregnancies offer an increasingly protective effect. Oral contraceptive use decreases the risk of ovarian cancer.
These factors support the idea that risk for ovarian cancer is related to ovulation. Two theories regarding this relationship have been proposed. The incessant ovulation theory suggests that repeated ovarian epithelial trauma caused by follicular rupture and subsequent epithelial repair results in genetic alterations within the surface epithelium. The gonadotropin theory proposes that persistent stimulation of the ovaries by gonadotropins, coupled with local effects of endogenous hormones, increases surface epithelial proliferation and subsequent mitotic activity.
Thus, the probability of ovarian cancer may be related to the number of ovulatory cycles, and conditions that suppress the ovulatory cycle may play a protective role. Ovulation suppression has been shown to decrease cancer incidence. Although treatment with agents that induce ovulation in women with infertility has been suggested to increase the incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer, this is unproven.
Genetic factors
Family history plays an important role in the risk of developing ovarian cancer. The lifetime risk for developing ovarian cancer is 1.6% in the general population. This compares with a 4-5% risk when 1 first-degree family member is affected, rising to 7% when 2 relatives are affected. From 5-10% of cases of ovarian cancer occur in an individual with a family history of the disease. Only a small percentage of these patients have an inherited genetic abnormality, and the risk of this occurrence increases with the strength of the family history. Hereditary epithelial ovarian cancer occurs at a younger age (approximately 10 years younger) than nonhereditary epithelial ovarian cancer, but the prognosis may be somewhat better.
Integrated genomic analyses by the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network have revealed high-grade serous ovarian cancer is characterized by TP53 mutations in almost all tumors. The findings also include the low prevalence but statistically recurrent somatic mutations in 9 further genes, including NF1, BRCA1, BRCA2, RB1, and CDK12, along with 113 significant focal DNA copy number aberrations and promoter methylation events involving 168 genes. Pathway analyses revealed defective homologous recombination in about half of all tumors, and that NOTCH and FOXM1 signaling are involved in serous ovarian cancer pathophysiology.[1]
At least 2 syndromes of hereditary ovarian cancer are clearly identified, involving either (1) disorders of the genes associated with breast cancer, BRCA1 and BRCA2, or (2) more rarely, genes within the Lynch II syndrome complex. Breast/ovarian cancer syndrome is associated with early onset of breast or ovarian cancer. Inheritance follows an autosomal dominant transmission. It can be inherited from either parent. Most cases are related to the BRCA1 gene mutation. BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene that inhibits cell growth when functioning properly; the inheritance of mutant alleles of BRCA1 leads to a considerable increase in risk for developing ovarian cancer.
Approximately 1 person in 4000 in the general population carries a mutation of BRCA1. Some populations have a much higher rate of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, especially Ashkenazi Jews. In families with 2 first-degree relatives (mother, sister, or daughter) with premenopausal epithelial ovarian cancer, the likelihood of a female relative having an affected BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is as high as 40%. The probability is much lower when the disease occurs in relatives postmenopausally.
Individuals with a BRCA1 gene mutation have a 50-85% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer and a 15-45% risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer. Those with a BRCA2 gene mutation have a 50-85% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer and a 10-20% risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer. Families with BRCA2 mutations are at risk for developing cancer of the prostate, larynx, pancreas, and male breast.
Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with increased risks of breast and ovarian cancers; however, in an investigation of a common genetic variation at the 9p22.2 locus, a decreased risk of ovarian cancer was noted in carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.[2]
Families with Lynch II syndrome or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer are characterized by a high risk for developing colorectal, endometrial, stomach, small bowel, breast, pancreas, and ovarian cancers. This syndrome is caused by mutations in the mismatch repair genes. Mutations have been demonstrated in mismatch repair genes MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, and PMS2.
Women with a history of breast cancer have an increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Previous hormone therapy
A nationwide prospective cohort study over 10 years that included all Danish women aged 50-79 years concluded that risk for ovarian cancer is increased with hormone therapy, regardless of duration of use, formulation, estrogen dose, regimen, progestin type, and administration route.[3] Nearly 1 million women without hormone-sensitive cancer or bilateral oophorectomy were followed. In an average of 8 years of follow-up, 3068 ovarian cancers were detected, of which 2681 were epithelial cancers.
Current users of hormones had incidence rate ratios for all ovarian cancers of 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.26-1.51) compared with women who never took hormone therapy. Risk declined as years since last hormone use increased. Incidence rates in current and never users of hormones were 0.52 and 0.40 per 1000 years, respectively. This translates to approximately 1 extra ovarian cancer for approximately 8300 women taking hormone therapy each year.
Other factors
Lactose consumption and the use of talcum powder on the vulva and perineum may be associated with increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Epidemiology
In the United States, the incidence of ovarian cancer is 33 cases per 100,000 women aged 50 years or older. The average patient age at diagnosis is 57 years. The estimated lifetime risk is 1 case in 70 women, which is a 1.4% lifetime incidence.
The American Cancer Society estimated that there would be 21,880 new cases of ovarian cancer in 2010 and 13,850 deaths from the disease.[4] The 2010 estimates are 21,880 cases and 13,850 deaths. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer in women, and uterine (corpus and endometrial) is fourth. The ovaries are the ninth most common site of cancer in women, accounting for approximately 3% of all new cases, but ovarian cancer causes 5% of cancer deaths—more than any other cancer of the female reproductive system. However, during 2001–2005, the incidence of ovarian cancer declined at a rate of 2.4% annually, and the death rate from ovarian cancer has been stable since 1998.[4]
Ovarian cancer is more common among American women in the white population than it is among those in the black population. Epithelial ovarian cancer can occur in females as young as 15 years, but the mean age is 56 years. In the United States, incidence of ovarian carcinoma is approximately 15 cases per 100,000 women per year for women aged 50-54 years, rising to 35 cases per 100,000 women for women aged 70-74 years.
International statistics
Internationally, the incidence is 3.1 cases per 100,000 women in Japan and 21 cases per 100,000 women in Sweden. Around the world, more than 200,000 women are estimated to develop ovarian cancer every year and about 100,000 die from the disease. Epithelial ovarian cancer occurs most commonly in white women in the industrialized countries of northern and western Europe and North America and least commonly in India and Asia. Asian women have low risk unless they relocate to North America or Europe. Scandinavian and Norwegian women have the highest risk.
Prognosis
Although the 5-year survival rate for ovarian cancer has improved significantly in the past 30 years, the prognosis for ovarian cancer remains poor overall, with a 46% 5-year survival rate. The prognosis of ovarian cancer is closely related to the stage at diagnosis,[5, 6] as determined according to the staging system developed by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). (See Staging.) Approximately 20%, 5%, 58%, and 17% of women present with stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively.
The 5-year survival rates (rounded to the nearest whole number) for epithelial ovarian carcinoma by FIGO stage are as follows:
- Stage IA - 87%
- Stage IB - 71%
- Stage IC - 79%
- Stage IIA - 67%
- Stage IIB - 55%
- Stage IIC - 57%
- Stage IIIA - 41%
- Stage IIIB - 25%
- Stage IIIC - 23%
- Stage IV - 11%
- Overall survival rate – 46%
Bakhru et al found poorer survival among patients with ovarian cancer and diabetes. Although the underlying reason for this association is unknown, further studies are needed.[7]
Among women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, BRCA2 mutation but not BRCA1 deficiency was associated with improved survival, improved chemotherapy response, and genome instability compared with BRCA wild-type.[8]
Tumors of Low Malignant Potential
Overall survival rate at 5 years according to FIGO is shown below. Others have reported better survival rates with 5-year, 10-year, 15-year, and 20-year survival for patients with serous LMP as 97%, 95%, 92%, and 89%, respectively.
Five-year-survival rate for LMP tumors by FIGO stage (survival percentages rounded to nearest whole number) are as follows:
- Stage IA - 93%
- Stage IB - 90%
- Stage IC - 91%
- Stage IIA - 88%
- Stage IIB - 86%
- Stage IIC - 100%
- Stage IIIA - 29%
- Stage IIIB - 75%
- Stage IIIC - 62%
- Stage IV - 30%
- Overall survival rate - 86%
Patient Education
For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine’s Cancer and Tumors Center and Women's Health Center. Also, see eMedicine’s patient education articles Ovarian Cancer and Ovarian Cysts.
Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. Jun 29 2011;474(7353):609-15. [Medline].
Ramus SJ, Kartsonaki C, Gayther SA, Pharoah PD, Sinilnikova OM, Beesley J, et al. Genetic Variation at 9p22.2 and Ovarian Cancer Risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jan 19 2011;103(2):105-116. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Mørch LS, Løkkegaard E, Andreasen AH, Krüger-Kjaer S, Lidegaard O. Hormone therapy and ovarian cancer. JAMA. Jul 15 2009;302(3):298-305. [Medline].
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. American Cancer Society. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2010.
Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM, Shin JY, Osann K, Kapp DS. Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol. Jun 2008;109(3):370-6. [Medline].
Woodward ER, Sleightholme HV, Considine AM, Williamson S, McHugo JM, Cruger DG. Annual surveillance by CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound for ovarian cancer in both high-risk and population risk women is ineffective. BJOG. Dec 2007;114(12):1500-9. [Medline].
Bakhru A, Buckanovich RJ, Griggs JJ. The impact of diabetes on survival in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Apr 2011;121(1):106-11. [Medline].
Yang D, Khan S, Sun Y, et al. Association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with survival, chemotherapy sensitivity, and gene mutator phenotype in patients with ovarian cancer. JAMA. Oct 12 2011;306(14):1557-65. [Medline].
Goff BA, Mandel LS, Drescher CW, Urban N, Gough S, Schurman KM, et al. Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: possibilities for earlier detection. Cancer. Jan 15 2007;109(2):221-7. [Medline].
Ryerson AB, Eheman C, Burton J, McCall N, Blackman D, Subramanian S, et al. Symptoms, diagnoses, and time to key diagnostic procedures among older U.S. women with ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. May 2007;109(5):1053-61. [Medline].
Goff BA, Mandel LS, Melancon CH, Muntz HG. Frequency of symptoms of ovarian cancer in women presenting to primary care clinics. JAMA. Jun 9 2004;291(22):2705-12. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Pantoja E, Noy MA, Axtmayer RW, Colon FE, Pelegrina I. Ovarian dermoids and their complications. Comprehensive historical review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. Jan 1975;30(1):1-20. [Medline].
Comerci JT Jr, Licciardi F, Bergh PA, Gregori C, Breen JL. Mature cystic teratoma: a clinicopathologic evaluation of 517 cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 1994;84(1):22-8. [Medline].
ACOG Practice Bulletin. Management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 2007;110(1):201-14. [Medline].
Drake J. Diagnosis and management of the adnexal mass. Am Fam Physician. May 15 1998;57(10):2471-6, 2479-80. [Medline].
Gallup DG, Talledo E. Management of the adnexal mass in the 1990s. South Med J. Oct 1997;90(10):972-81. [Medline].
Fleischer A. Ovarian cancer. In: Fleischer AC, Javitt MC, Jeffrey RB Jr, et al. Clinical Gynecologic Imaging. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996:107.
[Best Evidence] Yazbek J, Raju SK, Ben-Nagi J, Holland TK, Hillaby K, Jurkovic D. Effect of quality of gynaecological ultrasonography on management of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. Feb 2008;9(2):124-31. [Medline].
Iyer VR, Lee SI. MRI, CT, and PET/CT for ovarian cancer detection and adnexal lesion characterization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 2010;194(2):311-21. [Medline].
Tanaka YO, Okada S, Yagi T, Satoh T, Oki A, Tsunoda H, et al. MRI of endometriotic cysts in association with ovarian carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 2010;194(2):355-61. [Medline].
Stany MP, Maxwell GL, Rose GS. Clinical decision making using ovarian cancer risk assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 2010;194(2):337-42. [Medline].
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for ovarian cancer: recommendation statement. AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/ovariancan/ovcanrs.htm. Accessed January 25, 2010.
Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A, Johnson CC, Lamerato L, Isaacs C, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. Jun 8 2011;305(22):2295-303. [Medline].
Lachance JA, Choudhri AF, Sarti M, et al. A nomogram for estimating the probability of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Apr 2011;121(1):2-7. [Medline].
Hirai M, Hirai Y, Tsuchida T, et al. Stage IA Ovarian Cancers: Comparison of Sonographic Findings and Histopathologic Types Between Patients With Normal and Elevated Serum Cancer Antigen 125 Levels. J Ultrasound Med. Jul 2011;30(7):943-52. [Medline].
Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. Jun 8 2011;305(22):2295-303. [Medline].
No JH, Jeon YT, Park IA, et al. Activation of mTOR signaling pathway associated with adverse prognostic factors of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Apr 2011;121(1):8-12. [Medline].
Tapia V, Gabler F, Munoz M, et al. Tyrosine kinase A receptor (trkA): a potential marker in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Apr 2011;121(1):13-23. [Medline].
Lin HW, Tu YY, Lin SY, et al. Risk of ovarian cancer in women with pelvic inflammatory disease: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. Sep 2011;12(9):900-4. [Medline].
Lin L, Liu C, Tan H, et al. Anaesthetic technique may affect prognosis for ovarian serous adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Br J Anaesth. Jun 2011;106(6):814-22. [Medline].
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Ovarian Cancer Including Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer. Version 2. 2011. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/ovarian.pdf. Accessed May 8 2011.
van der Burg ME, van Lent M, Buyse M, et al. The effect of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy on the prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. N Engl J Med. Mar 9 1995;332(10):629-34. [Medline].
Rose PG, Nerenstone S, Brady MF, Clarke-Pearson D, Olt G, Rubin SC. Secondary surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Dec 9 2004;351(24):2489-97. [Medline].
Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P. Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jan 21 2009;CD006014. [Medline].
Park JY, Eom JM, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery in the management of platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Surg Oncol. Jan 15 2010;[Medline].
Fruscio R, Garbi A, Parma G, Lissoni AA, Garavaglia D, Bonazzi CM, et al. Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating Weekly Cisplatin for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jan 7 2011;[Medline].
Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Takahashi F, Isonishi S, Jobo T, Aoki D, et al. Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Oct 17 2009;374(9698):1331-8. [Medline].
Morgan MA, Sill MW, Fujiwara K, et al. A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. May 1 2011;121(2):264-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Winter-Roach BA, Kitchener HC, Dickinson HO. Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jan 21 2009;CD004706. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. Jan 5 2006;354(1):34-43. [Medline].
Hess LM, Benham-Hutchins M, Herzog TJ, Hsu CH, Malone DC, Skrepnek GH. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of intraperitoneal cisplatin for the front-line treatment of ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. May-Jun 2007;17(3):561-70. [Medline].
Elit L, Oliver TK, Covens A, Kwon J, Fung MF, Hirte HW. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review with metaanalyses. Cancer. Feb 15 2007;109(4):692-702. [Medline].
NCI Clinical Announcement on Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. January 5, 2006: National Cancer Institute; [Full Text].
Joly F, Ray-Coquard I, Fabbro M, et al. Decreased hypersensitivity reactions with carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared to carboplatin-paclitaxel combination: analysis from the GCIG CALYPSO relapsing ovarian cancer trial. Gynecol Oncol. Aug 2011;122(2):226-32. [Medline].
Pignata S, Scambia G, Ferrandina G, et al. Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin Plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin As First-Line Treatment for Patients With Ovarian Cancer: The MITO-2 Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. Sep 20 2011;29(27):3628-35. [Medline].
Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. Sep 2 2010;363(10):943-53. [Medline].
Markman M, Liu PY, Moon J, Monk BJ, Copeland L, Wilczynski S, et al. Impact on survival of 12 versus 3 monthly cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) administered to patients with advanced ovarian cancer who attained a complete response to primary platinum-paclitaxel: follow-up of a Southwest Oncology Group and Gynecologic Oncology Group phase 3 trial. Gynecol Oncol. Aug 2009;114(2):195-8. [Medline].
Parmar MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N, du Bois A, Delaloye JF, Kristensen GB. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet. Jun 21 2003;361(9375):2099-106. [Medline].
Pfisterer J, Plante M, Vergote I, du Bois A, Hirte H, Lacave AJ. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol. Oct 10 2006;24(29):4699-707. [Medline].
du Bois A, Herrstedt J, Hardy-Bessard AC, Müller HH, Harter P, Kristensen G, et al. Phase III trial of carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without gemcitabine in first-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. Sep 20 2010;28(27):4162-9. [Medline].
Hess LM, Rong N, Monahan PO, Gupta P, Thomaskutty C, Matei D. Continued chemotherapy after complete response to primary therapy among women with advanced ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer. Nov 15 2010;116(22):5251-60. [Medline].
Sehouli J, Stengel D, Harter P, Kurzeder C, Belau A, Bogenrieder T, et al. Topotecan Weekly Versus Conventional 5-Day Schedule in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. Nov 29 2010;[Medline].
Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, Narod SA, Van't Veer L, Garber JE. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med. May 23 2002;346(21):1616-22. [Medline].
Aghajanian NJ, Finkler T, Rutherford MG, Teneriello J, Yi H, Parmar LR, et al. OCEANS: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian (EOC), primary peritoneal (PPC), or fallopian tube cancer (FTC). American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2011 Annual Meeting. Presented June 4, 2011;Abstract LBA5007:[Full Text].
O'Malley DM, Richardson DL, Rheaume PS, et al. Addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel significantly improves progression-free survival in heavily pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. May 1 2011;121(2):269-72. [Medline].
Gordinier ME, Dizon DS, Weitzen S, Disilvestro PA, Moore RG, Granai CO. Oral thalidomide as palliative chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer. J Palliat Med. Feb 2007;10(1):61-6. [Medline].
Daponte A, Kostopoulou E, Kollia P, Papamichali R, Vanakara P, Hadjichristodoulou C, et al. L1 (CAM) (CD171) in ovarian serous neoplasms. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(1):26-30. [Medline].
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Available at http://guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=14336. Accessed January 25, 2010.
Zhang S, Royer R, Li S, et al. Frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among 1,342 unselected patients with invasive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. May 1 2011;121(2):353-7. [Medline].
Hetland TE, Hellesylt E, Florenes VA, et al. Class III ß-tubulin expression in advanced-stage serous ovarian carcinoma effusions is associated with poor survival and primary chemoresistance. Hum Pathol. Jul 2011;42(7):1019-26. [Medline].
Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Moss AA, Bazot M, Doucet M, Hugol D, et al. Cystic teratoma of the ovary: CT detection. Radiology. Jun 1989;171(3):697-701. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Fleischer AC, Cullinan JA, Peery CV, Jones HW 3rd. Early detection of ovarian carcinoma with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1996;174(1 Pt 1):101-6. [Medline].
Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, Kinkel K, Yu KK, Sica G, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging--multivariate analysis. Radiology. Jan 2000;214(1):39-46. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Jeong YY, Outwater EK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 2000;20(5):1445-70. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Kuwata Y, Imanaka K, Sugihara R, Sugimura K. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Radiat Med. Aug 1 2007;25(7):346-54. [Medline].
Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Minami M. Malignant or borderline mucinous cystic neoplasms have a larger number of loculi than mucinous cystadenoma: a retrospective study with MR. J Magn Reson Imaging. Jul 2007;26(1):94-9. [Medline].
Schulman H, Conway C, Zalud I, Farmakides G, Haley J, Cassata M. Prevalence in a volunteer population of pelvic cancer detected with transvaginal ultrasound and color flow Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1 1994;4(5):414-20. [Medline].

