Laboratory Studies
Possible lab tests in the evaluation of adnexal mass include serum markers, Papanicolaou test, CBC count, urinalysis (U/A), stool for blood, and electrolytes.
CA-125 is elevated in approximately 80% of all women with ovarian cancer. In stage I disease, the sensitivity of this biomarker is approximately 50%, which rises to 90% in patients with advanced disease.[27] However, it can also be elevated in many other conditions, including gynecologic etiologies such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and pregnancy, and nongynecologic conditions such as gastroenteritis, pancreatitis, cirrhosis, and congestive heart failure.[22, 23, 24] As such, the specificity of CA-125 is limited and is not recommended for routine screening purposes in the general population (see Clinical).[28]
OVA1 is a commercially available biomarker assay designed to help determine the risk of malignancy in a known pelvic mass. Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2009, the test is not intended to screen for or definitively diagnose cancer. Instead, the test is indicated as an adjunct to imaging and physical examination in women older than 18 years who have an ovarian mass for which surgery is already planned.[29]
OVA1 is a qualitative serum test that combines the results of 5 immunoassays (apolipoprotein A1, CA-125, transthyretin, beta-2 microglobulin, and transferrin) into a single numerical score (range 1-10). For premenopausal women, a score of greater than or equal to 5.0 raises concern for malignancy. In postmenopausal women, a cut-off score of 4.4 is used. A recently published prospective, double-blinded study demonstrated that the OVA1 multivariate index assay was more sensitive (98% vs 78%) but less specific (73% vs 43%) than physician assessment and CA-125 testing in identifying ovarian malignancy.[30] These results were most pronounced in premenopausal women and early-stage cancers. An elevated OVA1 score can help a general gynecologist determine which patients would benefit most from preoperative referral to a gynecologic oncologist.
Urine or serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) should be obtained in women of reproductive age to rule out pregnancy and pregnancy-related etiologies of adnexal masses.
Other serum markers such as AFP and LDH can be helpful when a germ cell tumor is suspected.
A Papanicolaou test should be considered in women undergoing a gynecologic surgery. This test should be used to help rule out any unknown cervical pathology. In extremely rare situations, this test may reveal the presence of an adnexal malignancy.
A CBC count helps evaluate for presence of inflammation and anemia. An infected mass such as a tubo-ovarian abscess results in an increased WBC count with an associated left shift. Adnexal masses rarely cause anemia, but because they often require surgical removal, this information should be known.
U/A results are generally normal in the presence of an adnexal mass. Bladder pathology may present with symptoms of an adnexal mass and may be discovered based on U/A results. Appendicitis can present similar to an adnexal mass but is often associated with WBCs in the U/A findings.
Results from testing stool for blood should be negative for adnexal masses but may be positive in women with colonic pathology.
Serum electrolytes should not be altered by an adnexal mass; however, symptoms associated with masses, such as nausea and vomiting, can cause alterations that must be known before anesthesia and surgery are considered.
Measuring other hormone levels is generally of limited value in the evaluation of adnexal masses. Obtaining estrogen and progesterone levels may be helpful in women suggested to have functional tumors, such as germ cell tumors, or if a girl younger than 12 years is being evaluated.
Imaging Studies
The most commonly performed test to evaluate an adnexal mass is transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasonography.[5, 6, 7, 31] This test helps demonstrate the presence of the mass and its location (eg, ovarian, uterine, bowel). It also provides the mass size, consistency, and internal architecture. Scoring systems, such as that suggested by DePriest and associates, can then be used to determine the likelihood of a malignant component.[32] Hysterosonography (ultrasonography with the presence of fluid in the uterine cavity) may be used to help distinguish between uterine masses and those arising from other pelvic structures. Color Doppler ultrasonographies can be used to evaluate the resistive index of the mass vessels, which, when low, has been indicative of a malignancy.
Pelvic radiographs are generally not helpful in the evaluation of adnexal masses. A dermoid cyst generally contains areas of calcification that may be picked up on a plain radiograph.
CT scans are most useful for assessing the remainder of the abdomen and pelvis when metastatic disease is suspected. Incidental adnexal masses are sometimes found when CT is performed for evaluation of other conditions. As with ultrasonography, CT scan can help identify the size, location, and relationship to other organs. CT scan is less effective than ultrasonography for determining the internal architecture of these masses.
MRI scans can help characterize adnexal mass characteristics in select cases when ultrasonographic findings are limited.[4]
Diagnostic Procedures
In limited settings, aspiration of the mass can be performed. However, this approach must be reserved for those women in whom an extremely low chance of a malignant mass exists and/or when surgical intervention is contraindicated.
ACOG Practice Bulletin. Management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 2007;110(1):201-14. [Medline].
Drake J. Diagnosis and management of the adnexal mass. Am Fam Physician. May 15 1998;57(10):2471-6, 2479-80. [Medline].
Gallup DG, Talledo E. Management of the adnexal mass in the 1990s. South Med J. Oct 1997;90(10):972-81. [Medline].
Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging--multivariate analysis. Radiology. Jan 2000;214(1):39-46. [Medline].
Alcazar JL, Ruiz-Perez ML, Errasti T. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography in adnexal masses: which parameter performs best?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1996;8(2):114-9. [Medline].
Castillo G, Alcázar JL, Jurado M. Natural history of sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol. Mar 2004;92(3):965-9. [Medline].
Modesitt SC, Pavlik EJ, Ueland FR, DePriest PD, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell JR Jr. Risk of malignancy in unilocular ovarian cystic tumors less than 10 centimeters in diameter. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2003;102(3):594-9. [Medline].
Zalel Y, Piura B, Elchalal U, Czernobilsky B, Antebi S, Dgani R. Diagnosis and management of malignant germ cell ovarian tumors in young females. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Oct 1996;55(1):1-10. [Medline].
Barber HR, Graber EA. Gynecological tumors in childhood and adolescence. Obstet Gynecol Surv. May 1973;28(5):suppl:357-81. [Medline].
Pfeifer SM, Gosman GG. Evaluation of adnexal masses in adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am. Jun 1999;46(3):573-92. [Medline].
Slap GB, Forke CM, Cnaan A, et al. Recognition of tubo-ovarian abscess in adolescents with pelvic inflammatory disease. J Adolesc Health. Jun 1996;18(6):397-403. [Medline].
Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A, Pelte MF, Hricak H. Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization--meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology. Jul 2005;236(1):85-94. [Medline].
Russo A, Calò V, Bruno L, Rizzo S, Bazan V, Di Fede G. Hereditary ovarian cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. Jul 23 2008;[Medline].
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 103: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2009;113(4):957-66. [Medline].
Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Cole DE, Rosen B, Bradley L, Kwan E. Prevalence and penetrance of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population series of 649 women with ovarian cancer. Am J Hum Genet. Mar 2001;68(3):700-10. [Medline].
Pal T, Permuth-Wey J, Betts JA, Krischer JP, Fiorica J, Arango H. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases. Cancer. Dec 15 2005;104(12):2807-16. [Medline].
Press JZ, De Luca A, Boyd N, Young S, Troussard A, Ridge Y. Ovarian carcinomas with genetic and epigenetic BRCA1 loss have distinct molecular abnormalities. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:17. [Medline].
Clement PB. Tumor-like lesions of the ovary associated with pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Pathol. Apr 1993;12(2):108-15. [Medline].
Chiang G, Levine D. Imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. Jun 2004;23(6):805-19. [Medline].
Padilla LA, Radosevich DM, Milad MP. Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jan 2005;88(1):84-8. [Medline].
Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A, Johnson CC, Lamerato L, Isaacs C, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. Jun 8 2011;305(22):2295-303. [Medline].
Mol BW, Bayram N, Lijmer JG, Wiegerinck MA, Bongers MY, van der Veen F, et al. The performance of CA-125 measurement in the detection of endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. Dec 1998;70(6):1101-8. [Medline].
Devarbhavi H, Kaese D, Williams AW, Rakela J, Klee GG, Kamath PS. Cancer antigen 125 in patients with chronic liver disease. Mayo Clin Proc. Jun 2002;77(6):538-41. [Medline].
Topalak O, Saygili U, Soyturk M, Karaca N, Batur Y, Uslu T, et al. Serum, pleural effusion, and ascites CA-125 levels in ovarian cancer and nonovarian benign and malignant diseases: a comparative study. Gynecol Oncol. Apr 2002;85(1):108-13. [Medline].
Alcazar JL, Guerriero S, Minguez JA, et al. Adding cancer antigen 125 screening to gray scale sonography for predicting specific diagnosis of benign adnexal masses in premenopausal women: is it worthwhile?. J Ultrasound Med. Oct 2011;30(10):1381-6. [Medline].
Canis M, Pouly JL, Wattiez A, et al. Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses suspicious at ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. May 1997;89(5 Pt 1):679-83. [Medline].
Carlson KJ, Skates SJ, Singer DE. Screening for ovarian cancer. Ann Intern Med. Jul 15 1994;121(2):124-32. [Medline].
The role of the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Dec 2002;87(3):237-9. [Medline].
Committee Opinion No. 477: the role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. Mar 2011;117(3):742-6. [Medline].
Ueland FR, Desimone CP, Seamon LG, Miller RA, Goodrich S, Podzielinski I. Effectiveness of a multivariate index assay in the preoperative assessment of ovarian tumors. Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2011;117(6):1289-97. [Medline].
Twickler DM, Forte TB, Santos-Ramos R, et al. The Ovarian Tumor Index predicts risk for malignancy. Cancer. Dec 1 1999;86(11):2280-90. [Medline].
DePriest PD, Gallion HH, Pavlik EJ, et al. Transvaginal sonography as a screening method for the detection of early ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Jun 1997;65(3):408-14. [Medline].
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Ovarian and endometrial function during hormonal contraception. Hum Reprod. Jul 2001;16(7):1527-35. [Medline].
Einhorn N. Ovarian cancer. Acta Oncol. 1996;35 Suppl 7:86-92. [Medline].
Schilder JM, Thompson AM, DePriest PD, Ueland FR, Cibull ML, Kryscio RJ, et al. Outcome of reproductive age women with stage IA or IC invasive epithelial ovarian cancer treated with fertility-sparing therapy. Gynecol Oncol. Oct 2002;87(1):1-7. [Medline].
Im SS, Gordon AN, Buttin BM, Leath CA 3rd, Gostout BS, Shah C. Validation of referral guidelines for women with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2005;105(1):35-41. [Medline].
van den Akker PA, Kluivers KB, Aalders AL, Snijders MP, Samlal RA, Vollebergh JH. Factors influencing the use of frozen section analysis in adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 2011;118(1):57-62. [Medline].

