eMedicine Specialties > Obstetrics and Gynecology > Labor and Delivery

Brow Presentation

Author: Jason Parker, DO, Director, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Director, Division of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Womack Army Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Peter G Napolitano, MD, FACOG, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington; Program Director of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellowship, Director of Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Chief of Prenatal Genetic Counseling, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Madigan Army Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jan 11, 2008

Introduction

In a brow presentation, the fetal head is midway between full flexion (vertex) and hyperextension (face) along a longitudinal axis. The presenting portion of the fetal head is between the orbital ridge, and the anterior fontanel presents at the pelvic inlet. The frontal bones are the point of designation and can present (as with the occiput during a vertex delivery) in any position relative to the maternal pelvis. When the sagittal suture is transverse to the pelvic axis and the anterior fontanel is on the right maternal side, the fetus would be in the right frontotransverse position (RFT).

Background

Brow presentation is the least common of all fetal presentations. Incidence varies from 1 in 500 deliveries to 1 in 3543 deliveries. Early in labor, a brow presentation may be encountered, but this is often unstable, and it converts to a vertex presentation. Occasionally, extension may result in a face presentation. The causes of a persistent brow presentation are generally similar to those causing a face presentation. These include cephalopelvic disproportion or pelvic contracture and increasing parity and prematurity, which are implicated in more than 60% of cases of persistent brow presentation. Premature rupture of membranes preceded brow presentation in as many as 27% of cases.

Diagnosis of a brow presentation by abdominal palpation can be made with Leopold maneuvers. A prominent occipital prominence is encountered along the fetal back, and the fetal chin is also palpable; however, the diagnosis of a brow presentation is usually confirmed by vaginal examination. The orbital ridge, eyes, nose, frontal sutures, and anterior fontanel are palpated. The mouth and chin are not palpable.

As with a face presentation, diagnosis is often made late in labor with half of cases occurring in the second stage of labor. The most common position is the frontum anterior, which occurs about twice as often as either transverse or posterior positions. A higher cesarean delivery rate occurs with a frontum transverse or a frontum posterior position than with a frontum anterior.

Mechanism of Labor

Three labor courses are possible when the fetal head engages in a brow presentation. The brow may convert to a vertex presentation, convert to a face presentation, or remain as a persistent brow presentation. The earlier in labor the diagnosis is made, the more likely conversion is to occur. Vertex or face presentation labor courses are managed accordingly when spontaneous conversion occurs.

In the brow presentation, the occipitomental diameter, which is the largest diameter of the fetal head, is the presenting portion. The head engages but can descend only with significant molding. This molding and subsequent caput succedaneum over the forehead can become so extensive that identification of the brow by palpation is impossible late in labor, which may result in a missed diagnosis in a patient who presents later in active labor.

Descent and internal rotation occur with an adequate pelvis and if the face can fit under the pubic arch. The persistent brow presentation with subsequent delivery only occurs in cases of a large pelvis and/or a small infant. At any time during labor, a brow presentation may convert to a face or vertex presentation.

If the frontum is anterior and the forces of labor are directed toward the fetal occiput, flex the head and pivot the face under the pubic arch, thus converting the fetal head to an occiput-posterior position. If the occiput lies against the sacrum and the forces of labor are directed against the fetal mentum, the neck may extend further, leading to a face presentation.

Labor Management

If the fetus continues with a brow presentation, the prognosis of a vaginal delivery is poor unless the fetus is small and/or the maternal pelvis is large. Expectant management is reasonable as long as the fetal heart tracing remains reassuring and dilation and descent are progressing normally because spontaneous conversion to vertex or face may occur. If dilation or descent ceases or if fetal heart tracing is not reassuring, cesarean delivery is indicated. Minimal intervention is generally best if labor is progressing normally.

Some authors believe that the use of oxytocin in brow presentation is contraindicated because of the increased risk of cephalopelvic disproportion; however, the use of oxytocin to correct an inadequate contraction pattern has been described. Less than half of fetuses with persistent brow presentations undergo spontaneous vaginal delivery, but a trial of labor is not contraindicated in most cases. Prolonged labor and secondary arrest are common in 33-50% of brow presentations. The use of forceps or manual conversion to convert a brow presentation to a more favorable position is contraindicated.

Keywords

vertex presentation, face presentation, Leopold maneuvers, oxytocin augmentation, labor, cesarean delivery, C-section

 


More on Brow Presentation

References

References

  1. Bednoff SL, Thomas BE. Brow presentation. N Y State J Med. Mar 15 1967;67(6):803-5. [Medline].

  2. Bhal PS, Davies NJ, Chung T. A population study of face and brow presentation. J Obstet Gynaecol. May 1998;18(3):231-5. [Medline].

  3. Cruikshank DP, White CA. Obstetric malpresentations: twenty years' experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 15 1973;116(8):1097-104. [Medline].

  4. Finsterer J. Ptosis: causes, presentation, and management. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May-Jun 2003;27(3):193-204. [Medline].

  5. Fogli AL. Temporal lift by galeapexy: a review of 270 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May-Jun 2003;27(3):159-65; discussion 166. [Medline].

  6. Ingolfsson A. Brow presentations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1969;48(4):486-96. [Medline].

  7. Kovacs SG. Brow presentation, Royal Hospital for Women, Paddington, 1950-1965, and review of literature. Med J Aust. Oct 31 1970;2(18):820-4. [Medline].

  8. Levy DL. Persistent brow presentation: a new approach to management. South Med J. Feb 1976;69(2):191-2. [Medline].

  9. Magid R, Gillespie CF. Face and brow presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1957;9:450-7.

  10. Mandeville JT, Roh JH, Woog JJ. Cutaneous benign mixed tumor (chondroid syringoma) of the eyelid: clinical presentation and management. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2004;20(2):110-6. [Medline].

  11. Meltzer RM, Sachtleban MR, Friedman EA. Brow presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;100:255-63.

  12. Mostar S, Akaltin E, Babuna C. Deflexion attitudes. Median vertex, persistent brow, and face presentations. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 1966;28(1):49-56. [Medline].

  13. Posner AC, Buch IM. Face and persistent brow presentations. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1943;77:618.

  14. Seeds JW, Cefalo RC. Malpresentations. Clin Obstet Gynecol. Mar 1982;25(1):145-56. [Medline].

  15. Skalley TW, Kramer TF. Brow presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1960;15:616-20.

  16. Stitely ML, Gherman RB. Labor with abnormal presentation and position. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Jun 2005;32(2):165-79. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

vertex presentation, face presentation, Leopold maneuvers, oxytocin augmentation, labor, cesarean delivery, C-section

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Jason Parker, DO, Director, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Director, Division of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Womack Army Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Peter G Napolitano, MD, FACOG, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington; Program Director of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellowship, Director of Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Chief of Prenatal Genetic Counseling, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Madigan Army Medical Center
Peter G Napolitano, MD, FACOG is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Andrea Witlin, DO, PhD, Former Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch
Andrea Witlin, DO, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Assumption Community Hospital
Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Carl V Smith, MD, The Distinguished Chris J and Marie A Olson Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Carl V Smith, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Medical Association, Arkansas Medical Society, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Council of University Chairs of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nebraska Medical Association, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.