eMedicine Specialties > Obstetrics and Gynecology > Gynecologic Surgery

Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy

Author: Allahyar Jazayeri, MD, PhD, Medical Director of Perinatal Services, Bellin Health Hospital Center
Coauthor(s): Herbert S Coussons, MD, FACOG, Private Practice in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Specialty Care
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jan 7, 2008

Introduction

Ectopic pregnancy is defined as implantation of a fertilized egg outside the endometrial cavity. Ectopic pregnancy is estimated to occur in 2% of all pregnancies. It remains a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality when misdiagnosed or left untreated and accounts for as much as 9% of maternal death in this country. Quantitative measurements of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β -hCG) and transvaginal ultrasonography have improved the accuracy of diagnosis and allow earlier detection of ectopic pregnancies. Although deaths associated with ectopic pregnancy have declined, more than three quarters of deaths in the first trimester and about 10% of all pregnancy-related deaths are associated with pregnancies outside of the womb.

History of the Procedure

Ectopic pregnancy was described by Charles Dickens in Nicholas Nickelby, in which he refers to "a disease in which death and life are so strangely blended." This is an accurate description since implanting outside the endometrial cavity results in the loss of pregnancy and the mother is also exposed to significant morbidity and potential mortality. 

In the past 30 years the ability to diagnose and treat ectopic pregnancies has significantly improved, thereby reducing the maternal risks.

Robert Lawson Tait, a British surgeon, is credited with performing the first successful laparotomy for ruptured tubal pregnancy in 1883. In 1881, Tait was consulted in the case of a patient who had been diagnosed with intraperitoneal hemorrhage secondary to a ruptured tubal pregnancy. The patient's physician suggested that Tait open the abdomen and remove the ruptured tube. Tait rejected the idea. After the woman died, Tait injected the specimen and determined that if he had operated and tied the broad ligament, he would have arrested the hemorrhage and probably would have saved the woman's life. In April of 1883, he operated on another woman and ligated the ruptured tube and broad ligament. This was the first successful surgical management of ruptured tubal pregnancy. At a time when ectopic pregnancy was associated with a greater than 60% mortality rate, Tait lost only 2 patients of the first 42 on which he operated.

By the 1920s, laparotomy and ligation of the bleeding vessels with removal of the affected tube was the standard of care and remained so until operative laparoscopy and salpingostomy replaced laparotomy and salpingectomy in the late 1970s.

In the 1980s and 1990s, medical therapy of ectopic pregnancy has been implemented and has replaced surgical treatment in many cases. Thus, in less than 3 decades, treatment has evolved from a surgical emergency to conservative medical management.

Problem

An ectopic pregnancy occurs outside of the uterus. Approximately 97.7% of all ectopic pregnancies occur in the fallopian tubes, with the rest occurring in the ovary, abdomen, or cervix.

Of tubal pregnancies, the ampulla is the most common site of implantation (80%), followed by the isthmus (11%), fimbria (4%), cornua (2%), and interstitia (3%).

Frequency

The incidence of ectopic pregnancy is reported most commonly as the number of ectopic pregnancies per 1000 conceptions. The incidence varies among populations. Over the last 40 years, the incidence has been increasing steadily.

In 1970, the reported rate in the United States was 4.5 cases per 1000 pregnancies. By 1987, this was reported as 16.8 cases per 1000 pregnancies. These statistics are based on US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data that use hospitalizations for ectopic pregnancy to determine the total number of ectopic pregnancies. Looking at raw data, 17,800 hospitalizations for ectopic pregnancies were reported in 1970. This number rose to 88,000 in 1989 but fell to 30,000 in 1998. This raises the question of whether the number of ectopic pregnancies is declining or whether many ectopic pregnancies are now treated in ambulatory surgical centers and even using medical therapy without admission. The author and many others believe the latter is true, but truly accurate statistics are lacking. The prevalence is estimated at 1 in 40 pregnancies or approximately 25 cases per 1000 pregnancies.

Approximately 85-90% of ectopic pregnancies occur in multigravid women. In the United States, rates are nearly twice as high for women of other races compared with white women.

Etiology

Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy include tubal damage, smoking, and altered motility in the fallopian tube.

  • Tubal damage can be the result of infections such as pelvic inflammatory disease or salpingitis or can also result from abdominal surgery or tubal ligation.
  • Smoking is a risk factor in about one third of ectopic pregnancies and may contribute to decreased tubal motility by damage to the ciliated cells in the fallopian tubes.
  • Altered tubal motility can also occur as the result of hormonal contraception. Both progesterone only contraception and progesterone intrauterine devices (IUDs) have been associated with increased risk of an ectopic pregnancy. 

One third of ectopic pregnancies occur in women with no known risk factors.

Pathophysiology

Delay or prevention of passage of the fertilized ovum (blastocyst) to the uterine cavity by the factors mentioned or by factors inherent in the embryo result in premature implantation.

Presentation

The typical triad includes bleeding and abdominal pain and a positive pregnancy test result. The clinical presentation can therefore be confusing, since symptoms overlap with miscarriage. A third of women have no clinical signs and 9% have no symptoms of ectopic pregnancy. As a result, almost half of cases are not diagnosed at the first prenatal visit.

The signs of ectopic pregnancy on examination include lower abdominal tenderness with or without rebound and pelvic tenderness usually much worse on the affected side. Abdominal rigidity, involuntary guarding, and severe tenderness as well as evidence of hypovolemic shock, such as orthostatic blood pressure changes and tachycardia, should alert the clinician to a surgical emergency; this may occur in up to 20% of cases.

On pelvic examination, the uterus may be slightly enlarged and soft, and uterine or cervical motion tenderness may suggest peritoneal inflammation. An adnexal mass may be palpated but is usually difficult to differentiate from the ipsilateral ovary.

Indications

Indications for surgery in ectopic pregnancy include women with the following criteria:

  • Not suitable candidate for medical therapy
  • Failed medical therapy
  • Heterotopic pregnancy with a viable intrauterine pregnancy
  • Hemodynamically unstable and need immediate treatment

Relevant Anatomy

The illustration below shows the anatomy of an ectopic pregnancy and the frequency distribution for this phenomenon.

Sites of ectopic pregnancies.

Sites of ectopic pregnancies.

Sites of ectopic pregnancies.

Sites of ectopic pregnancies.


Contraindications

The only contraindication to surgical management is a patient with a medically treatable ectopic pregnancy and other medical conditions that would make the risk of surgery unacceptable.

More on Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy

Overview: Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
Workup: Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
Treatment: Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
Follow-up: Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
Multimedia: Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
References

References

  1. Condous G, Kirk E, Lu C, Van Huffel S, Gevaert O, De Moor B. Diagnostic accuracy of varying discriminatory zones for the prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Dec 2005;26(7):770-5. [Medline].

  2. Lipscomb GH. Medical therapy for ectopic pregnancy. Semin Reprod Med. Mar 2007;25(2):93-8. [Medline].

  3. Stovall TG, Ling FW, Gray LA. Single-dose methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. May 1991;77(5):754-7. [Medline].

  4. Kaplan BC, Dart RG, Moskos M, et al. Ectopic pregnancy: prospective study with improved diagnostic accuracy. Ann Emerg Med. Jul 1996;28(1):10-7. [Medline].

  5. Bangsgaard N, Lund CO, Ottesen B, Nilas L. Improved fertility following conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. BJOG. Aug 2003;110(8):765-70. [Medline].

  6. Abbott J, Emmans LS, Lowenstein SR. Ectopic pregnancy: ten common pitfalls in diagnosis. Am J Emerg Med. Nov 1990;8(6):515-22. [Medline].

  7. Ackerman TE, Levi CS, Dashefsky SM, et al. Interstitial line: sonographic finding in interstitial (cornual) ectopic pregnancy. Radiology. Oct 1993;189(1):83-7. [Medline].

  8. Al-Sunaidi M, Tulandi T. Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Semin Reprod Med. Mar 2007;25(2):117-22. [Medline].

  9. Chandra L, Jain A. Maternal serum creatine kinase as a biochemical marker of tubal pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Apr 1995;49(1):21-3. [Medline].

  10. Cosin JA, Bean M, Grow D, Wiczyk H. The use of methotrexate and arterial embolization to avoid surgery in a case of cervical pregnancy. Fertil Steril. Jun 1997;67(6):1169-71. [Medline].

  11. Emerson DS, Cartier MS, Altieri LA, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of endovaginal color Doppler flow imaging in an ectopic pregnancy screening program. Radiology. May 1992;183(2):413-20. [Medline].

  12. Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet. Aug 13-19 2005;366(9485):583-91. [Medline].

  13. Graham H. Eternal Eve: The History of Gynaecology & Obstetrics. New York, NY: Doubleday; 1951:511-20.

  14. Graham M, Cooperberg PL. Ultrasound diagnosis of interstitial pregnancy: findings and pitfalls. J Clin Ultrasound. Dec 1979;7(6):433-7. [Medline].

  15. [Best Evidence] Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD000324. [Medline].

  16. Hsu S, Mitwally MF, Aly A, et al. Laparoscopic management of tubal ectopic pregnancy in obese women. Fertil Steril. Jan 2004;81(1):198-202. [Medline].

  17. Jafri SZ, Loginsky SJ, Bouffard JA, Selis JE. Sonographic detection of interstitial pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. May 1987;15(4):253-7. [Medline].

  18. Kadar N, DeVore G, Romero R. Discriminatory hCG zone: its use in the sonographic evaluation for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1981;58(2):156-61. [Medline].

  19. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. Apr 1 2006;367(9516):1066-74. [Medline].

  20. Koonin LM, MacKay AP, Berg CJ, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990. Mor Mortal Wkly Rep CDC Surveill Summ. Aug 8 1997;46(4):17-36. [Medline].

  21. Lavie O, Beller U, Neuman M, et al. Maternal serum creatine kinase: a possible predictor of tubal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1993;169(5):1149-50. [Medline].

  22. Leach RE, Ory SJ. Modern management of ectopic pregnancy. J Reprod Med. May 1989;34(5):324-38. [Medline].

  23. Luciano DE, Jain A, Roy G, Solima E, Luciano AA. Ectopic pregnancy--from surgical emergency to medical management. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Feb 2004;11(1):107-21, quiz 122. [Medline].

  24. Mateer JR, Aiman EJ, Brown MH, Olson DW. Ultrasonographic examination by emergency physicians of patients at risk for ectopic pregnancy. Acad Emerg Med. Oct 1995;2(10):867-73. [Medline].

  25. Mateer JR, Valley VT, Aiman EJ, et al. Outcome analysis of a protocol including bedside endovaginal sonography in patients at risk for ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med. Mar 1996;27(3):283-9. [Medline].

  26. Raughley MJ, Frishman GN. Local treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Semin Reprod Med. Mar 2007;25(2):99-115. [Medline].

  27. Raziel A, Mordechai E, Schachter M, et al. A comparison of the incidence, presentation, and management of ovarian pregnancies between two periods of time. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. May 2004;11(2):191-4. [Medline].

  28. Sowter MC, Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy: an update. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2004;16(4):289-293. [Medline].

  29. Stovall TG, Kellerman AL, Ling FW, Buster JE. Emergency department diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med. Oct 1990;19(10):1098-103. [Medline].

  30. Stovall TG, Ling FW, Cope BJ, Buster JE. Preventing ruptured ectopic pregnancy with a single serum progesterone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1989;160(6):1425-8; discussion 1428-31. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

tubal pregnancy, ovarian pregnancy, abdominal pregnancy, heterotopic pregnancy, extrauterine pregnancy, maternal mortality, pregnancy complications, problem pregnancy, ectopic, beta hCG, beta-hCG, culdocentesis, salpingitis, failed tubal surgical sterilization, failed sterilization, tubal ligation, progestin-containing intrauterine device, progestin-containing IUD, pelvic pain, vaginal spotting, EP, tubal ring, extrauterine mass, interstitial EP, interstitial ectopic pregnancy, interstitial line sign, cervical pregnancy, hemosalpinx, salpingectomy, salpingotomy, laparoscopy, fimbrial evacuation

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Allahyar Jazayeri, MD, PhD, Medical Director of Perinatal Services, Bellin Health Hospital Center
Allahyar Jazayeri, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Herbert S Coussons, MD, FACOG, Private Practice in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Specialty Care
Herbert S Coussons, MD, FACOG is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Christian Medical & Dental Society, Idaho Medical Association, Washington State Medical Association, and Wisconsin Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

John J Kavanagh Jr, MD, Chief, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gynecological and Medical Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas College of Medicine
John J Kavanagh Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association for the History of Medicine, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Society of Gynecologist Oncologists, Southern Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Assumption Community Hospital
Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michel E Rivlin, MD, Associate Professor, Coordinator, Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
Michel E Rivlin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Mississippi State Medical Association, and Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.