eMedicine Specialties > Obstetrics and Gynecology > Gynecologic Surgery

Gynecologic Myomectomy: Follow-up

Author: Kerri L Marquard, MD, Fellow, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University School of Medicine
Coauthor(s): David Chelmow, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Program Director, Tufts University Affiliated Hospitals OB/GYN Residency Program; Chair, Tufts University Health Sciences Campus Institutional Review Board; Edward G Evantash, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Associate Division Chief of General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Director of Center for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 6, 2008

Outcome and Prognosis

Despite a long history of using myomectomy and extensive literature on this procedure, data are actually poor because of 2 important issues related to outcome. In particular, both the recurrence rate and the impact on fertility have been poorly studied.

Abdominal myomectomy

In 1998, Vercellini et al extensively reviewed abdominal myomectomy as a fertility-enhancing procedure.102 They noted that although numerous papers report on fertility outcomes after myomectomy, they all share the same serious flaws. In particular, not a single study included controls or used randomization. Only a few of the studies used life-table analysis. All used differing definitions of infertility and included heterogeneous uses of other infertility treatments. Nonetheless, the studies were fairly consistent, with approximately two thirds of patients with myomas and otherwise unexplained infertility conceiving after myomectomy.

Similar results were noted in both prospective and retrospective studies. However, results were inconsistent when subgroups were analyzed. Myomectomy continues to be offered routinely to patients with uterine fibroids and infertility, but until controlled studies with expectantly managed controls are performed, the benefit of this procedure for patients remains unclear.

The risk of myoma recurrence is similarly poorly studied. Patients undergoing myomectomy should be counseled that they are at risk for fibroid recurrence and the potential for additional surgery in the future. Unfortunately, proper studies to determine recurrence risk are not available. Most studies are limited because they include heterogeneous study groups composed of a mixture of symptomatic patients who are treated for fibroids and asymptomatic patients who are treated for infertility. Follow-up in all of these studies is poor, with many patients lost to follow-up and most with short follow-up periods. Because fibroids may recur slowly over a long period, studies with short follow-up times do not yield the necessary information.

In addition, the studies use different definitions of recurrence, some limited only to symptomatic recurrence and some including patients with asymptomatic fibroids detected after ultrasonographic or pelvic examination. Most do not use life-table analysis.

Many women are likely to experience recurrence of myomas after myomectomy. In 1995, Fedele et al reported on the use of ultrasonography to help diagnose recurrences and noted a cumulative recurrence rate of 51% over 5 years.103 However, asymptomatic recurrence is not generally a relevant outcome. Limiting to studies that look at patients who require reintervention after myomectomy and appreciating that most of these studies have short (<5-y) follow-up, recurrence rates of 8-27% are noted (see Table 1). Most of the higher rates are noted in older studies, when hysterectomy was performed for much more liberal indications and was performed much more frequently. Looking at these studies, the medium-term risk for the need for repeat surgery after myomectomy is 5-10%. In the only study of risk factors for subsequent surgery, Stewart et al reported that the repeat surgery rate was 35%, with most of these being endoscopicprocedures.104

Several studies established particular risk factors for reoperation. In 1969, Malone noted that removal of multiple myomas was a strong risk factor for reoperation.105 Future repeat surgery was required in 26% of patients with multiple myomas, compared with 11% of patients with single myomas. Also, pregnancy after myomectomy appears to be protective. In 1991, Candiani et al noted that over 10 years following myomectomy, 15% of patients achieving pregnancy and 30% of patients not achieving pregnancy required repeat surgery.106

In 2002, Stewart et al noted a decreased risk of repeat surgery if the uterus was greater than 12 weeks' size at the time of the initial surgery (hazard ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.4) and an increased risk with weight gain of more than 30 pounds since age 18 years.104  In 2005, a retrospective analysis of 132 patients after myomectomy via laparotomy revealed a 62% 5-year recurrence rate and a 17% rate of reoperation for myomas. Lower recurrence rates were seen in patients with uterine size <10 weeks, patients with a single myoma, and those who had a subsequent childbirth.107

Table 1. Summary of Studies Reporting Need for Future Surgery for Myomas After Myomectomy

Open table in new window

Table
StudyYearFollow-up, moReoperation Rate
Finn and Muller 108 195024-120+13%
Brown et al 109 1956>7217%
Malone 105 1969>6027%
Berkeley et al 110 1983178%
Garcia and Tureck 111 1984>106%
Rosenfeld 112 1986>124%
Smith and Uhlir 113 1990NR5%
Verkauf 114 1992426%
Gehlbach et al 115 1993>1212%
Acien and Querada 116 19964-1448%
Stewart et al 104 200284 ± 3535%
Hanafi 107 20052-13617%
StudyYearFollow-up, moReoperation Rate
Finn and Muller 108 195024-120+13%
Brown et al 109 1956>7217%
Malone 105 1969>6027%
Berkeley et al 110 1983178%
Garcia and Tureck 111 1984>106%
Rosenfeld 112 1986>124%
Smith and Uhlir 113 1990NR5%
Verkauf 114 1992426%
Gehlbach et al 115 1993>1212%
Acien and Querada 116 19964-1448%
Stewart et al 104 200284 ± 3535%
Hanafi 107 20052-13617%

Another long-term complication that must be considered is the risk of uterine rupture during pregnancy. Fortunately, this is quite rare and is most likely to occur in labor. Although data are limited to support it, the usual recommendation is to offer cesarean delivery to patients who had myomectomies in which large defects in the active segment of the uterus were created by removal of the fibroids. Some recommend cesarean delivery any time the endometrial cavity is entered during the procedure, but what seems more likely is that the total extent of the defect, not entry into the endometrium, is the factor that presents the risk to the patient. Recommendations must be individualized for each patient. These recommendations are best made by the physician performing the myomectomy and should be clearly documented in the chart and conveyed to the patient so that the recommendations are clear in the event of future pregnancy.

Laparoscopic myomectomy

Regarding fertility, successful reproductive outcomes are possible after both laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy. A retrospective study by Seracchioli et al in 2006 reported a 54% pregnancy rate and a 67% delivery rate postlaparoscopic myomectomy.117  Cumulative pregnancy rates and live birth rates in a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy noted no difference between these 2 groups. However, the per cycle live birth rate and pregnancy rate were higher in patients who underwent laparoscopic fibroid removal.30  In a 2006 Cochrane review that included only 1 randomized controlled trial, pregnancy rates were similar in infertile patients who underwent myomectomy via laparotomy compared to laparoscopic myomectomy.118

A few studies have reported on the risk of recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy. One study observed 114 women for a mean of 37 months and defined recurrence as the return of any myoma. The cumulative recurrence risk was 10.6% at 1 year, 31.7% at 3 years, and 51.4% at 5 years. Eight patients underwent repeat laparoscopic myomectomies. One patient underwent 2 laparoscopic myomectomies. One patient had a myomectomy and then a total abdominal hysterectomy, and 6 had total abdominal hysterectomies. Of the patients, 14% required repeat surgery.66

Another group observed 192 women after laparoscopic myomectomy and found, based on symptoms and ultrasonographic findings, a cumulative recurrence risk of 16.7% at 5 years. Approximately 4% of the patients required further surgery.119 Interestingly, another study noted that the preoperative use of GnRH agonist increased the risk of myoma recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy.68

In 1992, Goldfarb presented data on patients who underwent myolysis with the Nd:YAG laser. He studied 75 patients and reported 50% shrinkage of the myomas at 6 months. This series, similar to most others on minimally invasive techniques, reported no medium- or long-term data on pregnancy or need for future procedures.64 In 1998, Chapman reported on a similar procedure performed on 293 patients. Of these, 6 patients required hysterectomy and 30 had future pregnancies.120 In 1995, Goldfarb reported on myolysis with bipolar cautery and reported 83% shrinkage over 6 months.63 One series reported 2 of 3 patients with uterine rupture after they became pregnant within 3 months of the procedure.121

Compared with abdominal myomectomy, patients having undergone laparoscopic myomectomy have less pain, shorter hospitalization59,122 , and fewer postoperative adhesions, but longer operative time.122 Overall, no difference is apparent in postoperative complications or fibroid recurrence between the 2 groups.65

Hysteroscopic myoma resection

Many studies have assessed fertility rates after hysteroscopic myomectomy and have noted pregnancy rates similar to those after abdominal myomectomy, approximately 60% (see Table 2). Again, no studies include expectantly managed control groups.

Table 2. Pregnancy Rates in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopic Myomectomy

Open table in new window

Table
AuthorYearStudy SizePregnancy Rate
Donnez et al 73 19902467%
Goldenberg et al 123 19951547%
Vercellini et al 124 19994037%
Fernandez et al 125 20015927%
Bernard et al 126 20003135%
Shokeir 127 20052972%
AuthorYearStudy SizePregnancy Rate
Donnez et al 73 19902467%
Goldenberg et al 123 19951547%
Vercellini et al 124 19994037%
Fernandez et al 125 20015927%
Bernard et al 126 20003135%
Shokeir 127 20052972%

Reoperation after hysteroscopic myomectomy has also been studied. As usual, these studies are limited by short follow-up periods. In 1995, Ubaldi et al reviewed older studies, which had reoperation rates of 5-25% after as long as 3 years of follow-up.82 In 1999, Vercellini et al studied 108 women who had hysteroscopic resection of submucous, pedunculated, sessile, or intramural leiomyomas. After a mean follow-up of 41 months, 27 patients had myoma recurrence based on ultrasonographic findings, with a 3-year cumulative recurrence rate of 34%. Twenty women had recurrent menorrhagia, with a 3-year rate of 30%.124

In 1999, Emanuel et al reported on 285 women who had submucous myomas treated with hysteroscopic myoma resection without endometrial ablation. Several patients required multiple procedures. Patients were monitored for a median of 46 months. Forty-one patients (14.5%) required repeat surgery. Patients who required repeat surgery were more likely to have larger uteri and higher numbers of submucous myomas. Hysterectomy was required in 20 of the 41 patients who required repeat surgery. Most (90.3%) patients with normal-sized uteri and 2 or fewer myomas did not require future surgery at 5 years.128

In a second series from Britain, also reported in 1999, Hart et al studied 122 women for a mean of 2.3 years. Of these women, 21% required repeat surgery by 4 years and 0% thereafter. Their regression analysis suggested that outcome was better in older women in whom the uterus was smaller than or equal to 6 weeks' gestational size or the fibroid was smaller than or equal to 3 cm and mainly intracavitary.129 In 1994, Donnez et al studied the recurrence of menorrhagia based on the site of the myoma. They noted that women who had multiple submucosal myomas were much more likely to have recurrent symptomatic menorrhagia than women who had only 1-2 myomas. Having the largest diameter inside the uterine cavity and the largest portion of the uterine wall were less accurate predictors.130

Although many reports exist regarding fertility after hysteroscopic myomectomy, currently no good randomized controlled trials have evaluated this outcome. 118

Vaginal removal of a prolapsed myoma

Management of a prolapsed vaginal myoma can also be problematic. A single study noted that removal of prolapsed myomas represented 2.5% of all procedures for myomas. Approximately 93.5% of these procedures were successful with transvaginal removal, and 6.5% of patients needed a total abdominal hysterectomy. Of the failures, only 1 had very serious complications. After the initial vaginal myomectomy, 34 patients were monitored for a median of 5.5 years. In these patients, 79% had no further symptoms from their fibroids. Of those remaining, 21% developed other symptoms, of whom 6% required a hysterectomy, 6% had a single repeat prolapsed myoma, and 3% (1 patient) had multiple repeat procedures.131

Future and Controversies

Many questions remain regarding the natural course of untreated fibroids, the efficacy of medical management, and the unanswered questions regarding surgery as discussed. The 2007 Agency for Health Care Research and Quality evidence-based review provides a superb review of these topics.23

Current controversies include the role of minimally invasive procedures. In particular, laparoscopic myomectomy has many theoretical advantages, including lower cost and avoidance of prolonged hospitalizations. However, whether the repair of the defect is as effective as that performed with abdominal myomectomy remains unclear, and the procedure may be associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture during pregnancy.

Medical therapy is also being explored. At present, data for medical management, particularly new treatments such as tibolone or older treatments such as controlling symptoms with birth control pills, are very scant. The role of GnRH analogs also requires further clarification. The advantages in terms of making the fibroids smaller must be balanced against the high cost and the subsequent inability to locate fibroids that were previously reduced by treatment.

A number of newer treatments are being explored. Uterine artery embolization (UAE), in particular, may be an especially promising minimally invasive approach to fibroids.132,133 In this procedure, angiographic catheters are introduced in the groin and passed to the uterine artery under fluoroscopic guidance. Microspheres are then injected, which lodge in the blood supply to the myomas and cause them to infarct. Significant pain from the acute infarction of the myomas usually requires hospital admission for pain control.

A number of complications have been reported, including prolapsing myomas, infection, and hematoma at the catheter placement site in the groin, and bleeding and infection requiring hysterectomy. However, short-term results for relief of heavy bleeding and pelvic pain and pressure have been good. In a meta-analysis comparing uterine artery embolization to surgical interventions for fibroids, embolization offers a shorter hospital stay and quicker return to normal activities but failed to show any significant benefit in effectiveness or safety.134  In the FIBROID registry, more than 1200 patients undergoing UAE were observed for 3 years after the procedure. More than 85% would recommend the procedure and about 15% of patients failed and underwent further surgery or repeat embolization.135

Although UAE is reserved for women who do not desire fertility, reports exist of pregnancies postembolization. One study suggested that women are able to achieve successful pregnancies after uterine fibroid embolization without significant adverse outcomes.136 A review of studies observing pregnancy after embolization concluded that these patients may have higher rates of spontaneous miscarriage, preterm delivery, malpresentation, and abnormal placentation.137 The ACOG Committee Opinion on UAE states that the procedure should be considered investigational or relatively contraindicated in women wishing to retain fertility.28 Overall, data are extremely limited and larger prospective studies are needed.

In 2004, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a new technology, ExAblate 2000. Use of high-intensity focused ultrasonographic waves under MRI guidance to induce coagulation necrosis in fibroids has been shown to be effective for treating solid tumors like fibroids. In one study of 109 patients, 71% had significant improvement in symptoms at 6 months and 51% at 12 months.138 More studies are needed for longer term analysis and evaluation of cost-effectiveness.

Robotic surgery has become increasingly popular in gynecologic procedures involving cancer staging, hysterectomies, and myomectomies. Advantages to the da Vinci including 3-dimensional imaging and enhanced dexterity may help surpass the obstacles encountered while enucleating the fibroid, and repairing the uterine defect in laparoscopic myomectomy. More prospective trials are needed in this area of interest.139

As more is learned about the genetics of leiomyomas, targeting the specific genetic defect to help prevent or treat myomas may eventually be possible.

 
Acknowledgments

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Susan Lee, MD, to the development and writing of this article.



More on Gynecologic Myomectomy

Overview: Gynecologic Myomectomy
Workup: Gynecologic Myomectomy
Treatment: Gynecologic Myomectomy
Follow-up: Gynecologic Myomectomy
Multimedia: Gynecologic Myomectomy
References

References

  1. Speert H. Obstetrics and Gynecology in America: A History. Chicago, Ill: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 1980.

  2. Hutchins FL Jr. Abdominal myomectomy as a treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):781-9. [Medline].

  3. Wallach EE, Vlahos NF. Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2004;104(2):393-406. [Medline].

  4. Day Baird D, Dunson DB, Hill MC, et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2003;188(1):100-7. [Medline].

  5. Schwartz SM. Epidemiology of uterine leiomyomata. Clin Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2001;44(2):316-26. [Medline].

  6. Keshavaraz H, Hillis SD, Kieke BA, Marchbanks PA. Hysterectomy surveillance -- United States, 1994-1999. MMWR Suvveillance Summaries. 2002;51:(SS05):1-8. [Full Text].

  7. Greenberg MD, Kazamel TI. Medical and socioeconomic impact of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):625-36. [Medline].

  8. Mauskopf J, Flynn M, Thieda P, Spalding J, Duchane J. The Economic Impact of Uterine Fibroids in the United States: A Summary of Published Estimates. Journal of Womens Health. Oct 2005;14:692-703. [Medline].

  9. Walker C, Stewart E. Uterine Fibroids: The Elephant in the Room. Science. Jun 2005;308:1589-1592. [Medline].

  10. Ligon AH, Morton CC. Genetics of uterine leiomyomata. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Jul 2000;28(3):235-45. [Medline].

  11. Tiltman AJ. Smooth muscle neoplasms of the uterus. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Feb 1997;9(1):48-51. [Medline].

  12. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Myomas and reproductive function. Fertil Steril. Sep 2004;82 Suppl 1:S111-6. [Medline].

  13. LevGur M, Levie MD. The myomatous erythrocytosis syndrome: a review. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1995;86(6):1026-30. [Medline].

  14. Parker WH, Fu YS, Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. Mar 1994;83(3):414-8. [Medline].

  15. Iverson RE Jr, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, et al. Relative morbidity of abdominal hysterectomy and myomectomy for management of uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1996;88(3):415-9. [Medline].

  16. Stovall DW, Parrish SB, Van Voorhis BJ, et al. Uterine leiomyomas reduce the efficacy of assisted reproduction cycles: results of a matched follow-up study. Hum Reprod. Jan 1998;13(1):192-7. [Medline].

  17. Eldar-Geva T, Meagher S, Healy DL, et al. Effect of intramural, subserosal, and submucosal uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. Oct 1998;70(4):687-91. [Medline].

  18. Klatsky PC, Lane DE, Ryan IP, Fujimoto VY. The effect of fibroids without cavitary involvement on ART outcomes independent of ovarian age. Human Reproduction. Feb 2007;22:521-526. [Medline].

  19. Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Schruefer JJ, Simon JA. The nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1995;86(3):461-5. [Medline].

  20. Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 1999;19(5):1179-97. [Medline].

  21. Davis KM, Schlaff WD. Medical management of uterine fibromyomata. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):727-38. [Medline].

  22. [Best Evidence] Wu T, Chen X, Xie L. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for uterine leiomyomas. Cochrane Database of Systmatic Reviews. 2007;[Medline].

  23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Management of Uterine Fibroids: An Update of the evidence. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 154. AHRQ Publication No. 07-E011. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/tp/uteruptp.htm. Accessed July, 2007.

  24. Seinera P, Arisio R, Decko A, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: indications, surgical technique and complications. Hum Reprod. Sep 1997;12(9):1927-30. [Medline].

  25. Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1992;80(5):884-8. [Medline].

  26. Darai E, Dechaud H, Benifla JL, et al. Fertility after laparoscopic myomectomy: preliminary results. Hum Reprod. Sep 1997;12(9):1931-4. [Medline].

  27. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Kreiker G. Laparoscopic myomectomy and myolysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1997;9(4):233-8. [Medline].

  28. ACOG Committee Opinion. Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Uterine artery embolization. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Feb 2004;103(2):403-4. [Medline].

  29. Hurst BS, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. Jan 2005;83(1):1-23. [Medline].

  30. Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo, A, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertility and Sterility. Oct 2007;88:933-941. [Medline].

  31. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Mazzon I, Bramante S, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques. Hum Reprod Update. Mar-Apr 2008;14:101-19. [Medline].

  32. Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate?. Hum Reprod. Jun 2002;17:1424-30. [Medline].

  33. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B, Sowter M. Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;CD000547. [Medline].

  34. Deligdisch L, Hirschmann S, Altchek A. Pathologic changes in gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist analogue treated uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril. May 1997;67(5):837-41. [Medline].

  35. Celik H, Sapmaz E. Use of a single preoperative dose of misoprostol is efficacious for patients who undergo abdominal myomectomy. Fertil Steril. May 2003;79(5):1207-10. [Medline].

  36. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Silfen SL, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Fertil. Sep-Oct 1991;36(5):275-80. [Medline].

  37. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C. Laparoscopic myomectomy today. A good technique when correctly indicated. Hum Reprod. May 1996;11(5):934-5. [Medline].

  38. Parker WH, Rodi IA. Patient selection for laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Nov 1994;2(1):23-6. [Medline].

  39. Sinha R, Hegde A, Warty N, Patil N. Laparoscopic excision of very large myomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Nov 2003;10(4):461-8. [Medline].

  40. Zullo F, Pellicano M, De Stefano R, et al. A prospective randomized study to evaluate leuprolide acetate treatment before laparoscopic myomectomy: efficacy and ultrasonographic predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1998;178(1 Pt 1):108-12. [Medline].

  41. Campo S, Garcea N. Laparoscopic myomectomy in premenopausal women with and without preoperative treatment using gonadoptropin-releasing hormone analogs. Human Reproduction. Jan 1999;14:44-48. [Medline].

  42. Cohen LS, Valle RF. Role of vaginal sonography and hysterosonography in the endoscopic treatment of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. Feb 2000;73:197-204. [Medline].

  43. Perino A, Chianchiano N, Petronio M, et al. Role of leuprolide acetate depot in hysteroscopic surgery: a controlled study. Fertil Steril. Mar 1993;59:507-10. [Medline].

  44. Parazzini F, Vercellini P, De Giorgi O, et al. Efficacy of preoperative medical treatment in facilitating hysteroscopic endometrial resection, myomectomy and metroplasty: literature review. Human Reproduction. Sep 1998;13:2592-7. [Medline].

  45. Donnez J, Polet R, Smets M, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1995;7:311-6. [Medline].

  46. Campo S, Campo V, Gambadauro P. Short-term and long-term results of resectoscopic myomectomy with and without pretreatment with GnRH analogs in premenopausal women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. Aug 2005;84:756-760. [Medline].

  47. Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2006;96:266-70. [Medline].

  48. Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL, et al. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2000;96:517-20. [Medline].

  49. Agostini A, Cravello L, Shojai R, et al. Postoperative infection and surgical hysteroscopy. Fertility and Sterility. Apr 2002;77:766-768. [Medline].

  50. Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y. A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. Oct 2006;86:990-4. [Medline].

  51. Wheeless CR. Atlas of Pelvic Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997.

  52. Rock JA, Jones HW. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

  53. Frederick J, Fletcher H, Simeon D, et al. Intramyometrial vasopressin as a haemostatic agent during myomectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. May 1994;101(5):435-7. [Medline].

  54. DeLancey JO. A modified technique for hemostasis during myomectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Feb 1992;174(2):153-4. [Medline].

  55. Fletcher H, Frederick J, Hardie M, Simeon D. A randomized comparison of vasopressin and tourniquet as hemostatic agents during myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1996;87(6):1014-8. [Medline].

  56. Ginsburg ES, Benson CB, Garfield JM, et al. The effect of operative technique and uterine size on blood loss during myomectomy: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. Dec 1993;60(6):956-62. [Medline].

  57. [Best Evidence] Kongnyuy E, Wiysonge C. Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;[Medline].

  58. Tulandi T, Murray C, Guralnick M. Adhesion formation and reproductive outcome after myomectomy and second- look laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1993;82(2):213-5. [Medline].

  59. Parker W. Uterine myomas: management. Fertility and Sterility. Aug 2007;88:255-271. [Medline].

  60. Carter JE, McCarus SD. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Time and cost analysis of power vs. manual morcellation. J Reprod Med. Jul 1997;42(7):383-8. [Medline].

  61. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Bess O, et al. Laparoscopically assisted myomectomy: a report of a new technique in 57 cases. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. Jan-Feb 1994;39(1):39-44. [Medline].

  62. Zreik TG, Rutherford TJ, Palter SF, et al. Cryomyolysis, a new procedure for the conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Feb 1998;5(1):33-8. [Medline].

  63. Goldfarb HA. Laparoscopic coagulation of myoma (myolysis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):807-19. [Medline].

  64. Goldfarb HA. Nd:YAG laser laparoscopic coagulation of symptomatic myomas. J Reprod Med. Jul 1992;37(7):636-8. [Medline].

  65. Peacock K, Hurst BS. Laparoscopic Myomectomy. Surgical Technology International. 2006;15:141-145. [Medline].

  66. Nezhat FR, Roemisch M, Nezhat CH, et al. Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Aug 1998;5(3):237-40. [Medline].

  67. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod. Dec 2000;15(12):2663-8. [Medline].

  68. Rossetti A, Sizzi O, Soranna L, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic myomectomy: recurrence rate in comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod. Apr 2001;16(4):770-4. [Medline].

  69. Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, et al. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. Mar-Apr 2006;13:92-97. [Medline].

  70. Corson SL, Brooks PG. Resectoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril. Jun 1991;55(6):1041-4. [Medline].

  71. Corson SL. Hysteroscopic diagnosis and operative therapy of submucous myoma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):739-55. [Medline].

  72. Gimpelson RJ. Hysteroscopic treatment of the patient with intracavitary pathology (myomectomy/polypectomy). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Jun 2000;27(2):327-37, vii. [Medline].

  73. Donnez J, Gillerot S, Bourgonjon D, et al. Neodymium: YAG laser hysteroscopy in large submucous fibroids. Fertil Steril. Dec 1990;54(6):999-1003. [Medline].

  74. Brooks PG. Resectoscopic myoma vaporizer. J Reprod Med. Nov 1995;40(11):791-5. [Medline].

  75. Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K. The Intra Uterine Morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. Jan-Feb 2005;12:62-6. [Medline].

  76. Indman PD. Factors affecting capacitive current diversion with a uterine resectoscope: an in vitro study. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Feb 2004;11:128. [Medline].

  77. Indman PD. Hysteroscopic treatment of submucous myomas. Clin Obstet Bynecol. Dec 2006;49:811-20. [Medline].

  78. Murakami T, Tachibana M, Hoshiai T, et al. Successful strategy for the hysteroscopic myomectomy of a submucous myoma arising from the uterine fundus. Fertil Steril. Nov 2006;86:1513.e19-22. [Medline].

  79. Loffer FD. Removal of large symptomatic intrauterine growths by the hysteroscopic resectoscope. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1990;76:836-40. [Medline].

  80. Iverson RE Jr, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, et al. Myomectomy fever: testing the dogma. Fertil Steril. Jul 1999;72(1):104-8. [Medline].

  81. Blackwell R. Operative hysteroscopic procedures. In: Azzis R, Murphy AA, eds. Practical Manual of Operative Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1992:167-72.

  82. Ubaldi F, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Fertility after hysteroscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod Update. Jan 1995;1(1):81-90. [Medline].

  83. Vavala V, Lanzone A, Monaco A, et al. Postoperative GnRH analog treatment for the prevention of recurrences of uterine myomas after myomectomy. A pilot study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1997;43(4):251-4. [Medline].

  84. LaMorte AI, Lalwani S, Diamond MP. Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1993;82(6):897-900. [Medline].

  85. Sawin SW, Pilevsky ND, Berlin JA, Barnhart KT. Comparability of perioperative morbidity between abdominal myomectomy and hysterectomy for women with uterine leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 2000;183(6):1448-55. [Medline].

  86. Frederick J, Hardie M, Reid M, et al. Operative morbidity and reproductive outcome in secondary myomectomy: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. Nov 2002;17(11):2967-71. [Medline].

  87. Golan D, Aharoni R, Gonen Y, et al. Early spontaneous rupture of post myomectomy gravid uterus. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Feb 1990;31:167-170. [Medline].

  88. Ozeren M, Ulusoy M, Uyanik E. First-trimester spontaneous uterine rupture after traditional mymectomy: case report. Isr J Med Sci. Nov 1997;33:752-753. [Medline].

  89. Roopnarinesingh S, Suratsingh J, Roopnarinesingh A. The obstetric outcome of patients with previous myomectomy or hysterotomy. W.I. Med. J. Mar 1985;34:59-62. [Medline].

  90. Nkemayim DC, Hammadeh ME, Hippach M, et al. Uterine rupture in pregnancy subsequent to previous laparoscopic electromyolysis. Case report and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. Nov 2000;264(3):154-6. [Medline].

  91. Hockstein S. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the early third trimester after laparoscopically assisted myomectomy. A case report. J Reprod Med. Feb 2000;45(2):139-41. [Medline].

  92. Pelosi MA 3rd, Pelosi MA. Spontaneous uterine rupture at thirty-three weeks subsequent to previous superficial laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1997;177(6):1547-9. [Medline].

  93. Arcangeli S, Pasquarette MM. Gravid uterine rupture after myolysis. Obstet Gynecol. May 1997;89(5 Pt 2):857. [Medline].

  94. Paul P, Koshy A, Thomas T. Pregnancy outcomes following laparoscopic myomectomy and single-layer myometrial closure. Human Reproduction. Dec 2006;21:3278-3281. [Medline].

  95. Altgassen C, Kuss S, Berger U, et al. Complications in laparoscopic myomectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. Apr 2006;20:614-618. [Medline].

  96. Cooper JM, Brady RM. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of operative hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Jun 2000;27(2):347-66. [Medline].

  97. Emanuel MH, Hart A, Wamsteker K, et al. An analysis of fluid loss during transcervical resection of submucous myomas. Fertil Steril. Nov 1997;68:881-6. [Medline].

  98. Phillips DR, Nathanson HG, Milim SJ, et al. The effect of dilute vasopressin solution on blood loss during operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1996;88:761-766. [Medline].

  99. Corson SL, Brooks SG, Serden SP, et al. Effects of vasopressin administration during hysteroscopic surgery. J Reprod Med. Jun 1994;39:419-23. [Medline].

  100. Indman PD. Hysteroscopic treatment of menorrhagia associated with uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. May 1993;81(5 ( Pt 1)):716-20. [Medline].

  101. Hallez JP. Single-stage total hysteroscopic myomectomies: indications, techniques, and results. Fertil Steril. Apr 1995;63(4):703-8. [Medline].

  102. Vercellini P, Maddalena S, De Giorgi O, et al. Abdominal myomectomy for infertility: a comprehensive review. Hum Reprod. Apr 1998;13(4):873-9. [Medline].

  103. Fedele L, Parazzini F, Luchini L, et al. Recurrence of fibroids after myomectomy: a transvaginal ultrasonographic study. Hum Reprod. Jul 1995;10(7):1795-6. [Medline].

  104. Stewart EA, Faur AV, Wise LA, et al. Predictors of subsequent surgery for uterine leiomyomata after abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. Mar 2002;99(3):426-32. [Medline].

  105. Malone LJ. Myomectomy: recurrence after removal of solitary and multiple myomas. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1969;34(2):200-3. [Medline].

  106. Candiani GB, Fedele L, Parazzini F, Villa L. Risk of recurrence after myomectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Apr 1991;98(4):385-9. [Medline].

  107. Hanafi M. Predictors of leiomyoma recurrence after myomectomy. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Apr 2005;105:877-881. [Medline].

  108. Finn WF, Muller PF. Abdominal myomectomy: special reference to subsequent pregnancy and to the reappearance of fibromyomas of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul 1950;60(1):109-16. [Medline].

  109. Brown AB, Chamberlain R, Te Linde RW. Myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1956;71(4):759-63. [Medline].

  110. Berkeley AS, DeCherney AH, Polan ML. Abdominal myomectomy and subsequent fertility. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Mar 1983;156(3):319-22. [Medline].

  111. Garcia CR, Tureck RW. Submucosal leiomyomas and infertility. Fertil Steril. Jul 1984;42(1):16-9. [Medline].

  112. Rosenfeld DL. Abdominal myomectomy for otherwise unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. Aug 1986;46(2):328-30. [Medline].

  113. Smith DC, Uhlir JK. Myomectomy as a reproductive procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1990;162(6):1476-9; discussion 1479-82. [Medline].

  114. Verkauf BS. Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation. Fertil Steril. Jul 1992;58(1):1-15. [Medline].

  115. Gehlbach DL, Sousa RC, Carpenter SE, Rock JA. Abdominal myomectomy in the treatment of infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jan 1993;40(1):45-50. [Medline].

  116. Acien P, Quereda F. Abdominal myomectomy: results of a simple operative technique. Fertil Steril. Jan 1996;65(1):41-51. [Medline].

  117. Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Vianello F, et al. Obstetric and delivery outcome of pregnancies achieved after laparoscopic mymectomy. Fertility and Sterility. Jul 2006;86:159-165. [Medline].

  118. Griffiths A, D'Angelo A, Amso N. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;[Medline].

  119. Doridot V, Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, et al. Recurrence of leiomyomata after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Nov 2001;8(4):495-500. [Medline].

  120. Chapman R. New therapeutic technique for treatment of uterine leiomyomas using laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) by a minimally invasive method. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;22(3):171-8. [Medline].

  121. Vilos GA, Daly LJ, Tse BM. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic electromyolysis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Aug 1998;5(3):289-92. [Medline].

  122. Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertility and Sterility. Jan 2008;89:1-16. [Medline].

  123. Goldenberg M, Sivan E, Sharabi Z, et al. Outcome of hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas for infertility. Fertil Steril. Oct 1995;64(4):714-6. [Medline].

  124. Vercellini P, Zaina B, Yaylayan L, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: long-term effects on menstrual pattern and fertility. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1999;94(3):341-7. [Medline].

  125. Fernandez H, Sefrioui O, Virelizier C, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myomas in patients with infertility. Hum Reprod. Jul 2001;16(7):1489-92. [Medline].

  126. Bernard G, Darai E, Poncelet C, et al. Fertility after hysteroscopic myomectomy: effect of intramural myomas associated. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. Jan 2000;88(1):85-90. [Medline].

  127. Shokeir TA. Hysteroscopic management in submucous fibroids to improve fertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. Nov 2005;273(1):50-4. [Medline].

  128. Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K, Hart AA, et al. Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. May 1999;93(5 Pt 1):743-8. [Medline].

  129. Hart R, Molnar BG, Magos A. Long term follow up of hysteroscopic myomectomy assessed by survival analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Jul 1999;106(7):700-5. [Medline].

  130. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Clerckx F, et al. Advanced endoscopic techniques used in dysfunctional bleeding, fibroids and endometriosis, and the role of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. May 1994;101 Suppl 10:2-9. [Medline].

  131. Ben-Baruch G, Schiff E, Menashe Y, Menczer J. Immediate and late outcome of vaginal myomectomy for prolapsed pedunculated submucous myoma. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1988;72(6):858-61. [Medline].

  132. Siskin GP, Stainken BF, Dowling K, et al. Outpatient uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: experience in 49 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. Mar 2000;11(3):305-11. [Medline].

  133. Hurst BS, Stackhouse DJ, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. Nov 2000;74(5):855-69. [Medline].

  134. [Best Evidence] Gupta JK, Sinha AS, Lumsden MA, et al. Uterine artery emobolization for symptomatic uterine myomas. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;CD005073:[Medline].

  135. Goodwin SC, Spies JB, Worthington-Kirsch R, et al. Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry. Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2008;111:22-33. [Medline].

  136. Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J, et al. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: the Ontario multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2005;105(1):67-76. [Medline].

  137. Usadi RS, Marshburn PB. The impact of uterine artery embolization on fertility and pregnancy outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2007;19:279-283. [Medline].

  138. Stewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM, et al. Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertility and Sterility. Jan 2006;85:22-29. [Medline].

  139. Advincula AP, Song A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Aug 2007;19(4):331-6. [Medline].

  140. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG practice bulletin. Surgical alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas. Number 16, May 2000 (replaces educational bulletin number 192, May 1994). Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jun 2001;73(3):285-93. [Medline].

  141. Chiaffarino F, Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, et al. Diet and uterine myomas. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1999;94(3):395-8. [Medline].

  142. Dubuisson JB, Fauconnier A, Chapron C, et al. Reproductive outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy in infertile women. J Reprod Med. Jan 2000;45(1):23-30. [Medline].

  143. Miller CE, Johnston M, Rundell M. Laparoscopic myomectomy in the infertile woman. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Aug 1996;3(4):525-32. [Medline].

  144. Parker W, Iacampo K, Long T. Uterine rupture after laparoscopic removal of a pedunculated myoma. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. May-Jun 2007;14:362-364. [Medline].

  145. Römer T. Benefit of GnRH analogue pretreatment for hysteroscopic surgery in patients with bleeding disorders. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998;45 Suppl 1:12-20; discussion 21, 35. [Medline].

  146. Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, et al. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul 2003;189(1):48-54. [Medline].

  147. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Myomas and Reproductive Function. Ferility and Sterility. Nov 2006;86:S194-199. [Medline].

  148. Vikhlyaeva EM, Khodzhaeva ZS, Fantschenko ND. Familial predisposition to uterine leiomyomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Nov 1995;51(2):127-31. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

abdominal myomectomy, hysteroscopic myomectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy, uterine leiomyomas, uterine artery embolization, MR guided focused ultrasound, infertility, pregnancy, conception, myomas, leiomyomata, fibroids, hysterectomy, childbearing, uterine preservation, benign uterine growths, abnormal uterine bleeding, estrogen stimulation, smooth muscle tumors, intermenstrual bleeding, menorrhagia, menstrual irregularity

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Kerri L Marquard, MD, Fellow, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University School of Medicine
Kerri L Marquard, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

David Chelmow, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Program Director, Tufts University Affiliated Hospitals OB/GYN Residency Program; Chair, Tufts University Health Sciences Campus Institutional Review Board
David Chelmow, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Massachusetts Medical Society, Phi Beta Kappa, Sigma Xi, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, and Society for Medical Decision Making
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Edward G Evantash, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Associate Division Chief of General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Director of Center for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center
Edward G Evantash, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Disclosure: Cytyc Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Medical Editor

Thomas Michael Price, MD, Associate Professor of Reproductive Endocrinology, Director of Reproductive Fellowship Training Program, Duke University Medical Center
Thomas Michael Price, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Endocrine Society, Phi Beta Kappa, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, and South Carolina Medical Association
Disclosure: Clinical Advisors Group Consulting fee Consulting; MEDA Corp Consulting Consulting fee Consulting; Gerson Lehrman Group Advisor  Consulting fee Consulting; Roche/GSK Spokesperson  Consulting fee Consulting

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center
Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michel E Rivlin, MD, Professor, Coordinator, Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
Michel E Rivlin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Mississippi State Medical Association, and Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

RELATED EMEDICINE ARTICLES
Patient Education
 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.