eMedicine Specialties > Obstetrics and Gynecology > Gynecologic Surgery

Gynecologic Myomectomy

Author: Kerri L Marquard, MD, Fellow, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University School of Medicine
Coauthor(s): David Chelmow, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Program Director, Tufts University Affiliated Hospitals OB/GYN Residency Program; Chair, Tufts University Health Sciences Campus Institutional Review Board; Edward G Evantash, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Associate Division Chief of General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Director of Center for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 6, 2008

Introduction

Uterine leiomyomas are among the most common problems encountered by the obstetrician/gynecologist. They are a frequent cause of pain and abnormal bleeding and are thought to be involved in infertility. Uterine leiomyomas are the most frequent indication for hysterectomy in the United States. Many patients develop myomas but still desire to retain the option of future childbearing or simply want to preserve their uterus. For these women, myomectomy, the removal of the myomas with reconstruction and preservation of the uterus, is an important option.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Women's Health Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Fibroids.

History of the Procedure

Successful abdominal myomectomy was reported as early as 1845 by brothers Washington and John Atlee in the American Journal of Medical Science. Washington, the older brother, eventually published his experience with 14 abdominal myomectomies, winning the annual prize essay award of the American Medical Association despite the death of 5 of the patients.1

The operation was slow to gain widespread use. In 1875, W.H. Byford gave the Chairman's address to the American Medical Association Section on Obstetrics and Gynecology and said abdominal myomectomy was "so dangerous and difficult as not to be thought of except in desperate conditions."1

At the turn of the 20th century, abdominal myomectomy was associated with a mortality rate of 40%, compared with 6-7% for abdominal hysterectomy. Victor Bonney is credited for advocating and popularizing the procedure in the 1920s.2

Problem

Uterine leiomyomata, or fibroids as they are more frequently but less correctly known, affect more than 20% of reproductive-aged women. Patients can have a single myoma or numerous myomas. They are benign growths in the wall of the uterus (see Media file 1). Most are small, do not cause symptoms, and are noted as incidental findings during routine pelvic examinations or pelvic imaging studies. When they enlarge, they can cause a mass effect, resulting in pelvic pressure or pain or a distortion of the uterine wall or endometrial cavity, which leads to abnormal uterine bleeding. At times they can cause other problems; for instance, they can prolapse through the cervix or may be confused for an ovarian mass. They are one of the most frequently encountered problems by the obstetrician/gynecologist. They can also cause problems in pregnancy, and, in some patients, myomas are thought to be linked to infertility.

For related information on pregnancy, see Medscape's Pregnancy Resource Center.

Frequency

Uterine leiomyomata occur in 20-40% of reproductive-aged women.3 Results from some ultrasonographic studies indicate the presence of at least 1 small myoma in 51% of women. Of these women, 10-35% of Caucasian women and 30-50% of African American women have fibroids of clinical significance.4 Myomas grow in response to estrogen stimulation and regress after menopause. Thus, they are most frequently found in women in their fifth decade of life and are quite rare in those younger than 20 years. In 2001, Schwartz reviewed the epidemiology of leiomyomas. The risk is 2-3 times higher in African American women than in white women, increases with age, decreases with having a live-born child, may increase with body mass index, and may decrease with cigarette smoking. Risk may also increase with diets high in red meat and ham and it may decrease with diets high in intake of green vegetables.5

Most myomas are asymptomatic and inconsequential. Nonetheless, many women have significant symptoms from myomas, and myomas are the most frequent indication for hysterectomy in the United States. This indication constituted 38.1% of all hysterectomies (1.36 million) from 1994-1999.6 Figures for myomectomy are older, but, in 1984, 18,000 myomectomies were performed, compared with 112,000 hysterectomies, suggesting approximately 1 myomectomy per 6 hysterectomies among women aged 15-44 years.7  The symptoms of fibroids, along with both surgical and medical treatments, result in enormous costs for affected women and society. To date in the United States, few data exist regarding the annual economic burden of uterine fibroids.8

Etiology

Leiomyomas are smooth muscle tumors that form in the uterine wall. The development and growth of uterine fibroids are influenced by multiple features including autocrine and paracrine growth factors, genetic abnormalities, race, and environmental estrogen exposure related to age of menarche, obesity, and parity.9

The precise etiology is not known, although many cytogenetic and genetic studies have been performed. Approximately 40-50% of myomas have karyotypic abnormalities, particularly involving chromosomes 6, 7, 12, and 14. Within a myoma, all cells are identical and a monoclonal origin has been confirmed. In patients with multiple myomas, different karyotypes are noted, which suggests that each myoma arises as an individual event.10 Other changes noted include increased expression of estrogen, progesterone, and insulinlike growth factor 1 and 2 receptors and abnormalities in the myometrium adjacent to the myoma.11  

Pathophysiology

Although myomas are common, relatively few actually cause symptoms. Whether symptoms are present depends largely on a combination of size, number, and location of the myomas. In general, myoma growth is a result of the stimulation of estrogen, which is present until menopause. Over time, previously asymptomatic myomas may grow and become symptomatic. Conversely, many myomas begin to shrink as menopause removes the estrogen stimulation and many myoma-related symptoms resolve spontaneously shortly after menopause.

Myomas are generally categorized by location. Intramural myomas are entirely or mostly contained within the myometrium. Subserosal myomas project outward from the uterus (see Media file 1). Submucosal myomas project into the endometrial cavity (see Media file 2). Pedunculated myomas are attached to the uterine wall by stalks and can be directed into either the peritoneal or the uterine cavity.

Pelvic pressure and pain symptoms are usually the result of mass effect. This can occur either from a single large myoma or from a combination of multiple smaller myomas. A fibroid uterus can grow to be quite large, at times reaching the size of a term gravid uterus. Interestingly, perhaps due to the slow growth and accommodation by the patient, some extremely large uteri are well tolerated by patients and do not require intervention. Some large myomas that impinge on the ureters can cause hydronephrosis and, very rarely, ureteral obstruction.

Bleeding abnormalities are usually the result of distortion of the endometrial cavity by myomas. Unlike pain, which is usually caused by large or multiple myomas, some patients have significant intermenstrual bleeding or menorrhagia from a single, small, strategically placed myoma. A submucosal myoma sometimes can prolapse through the cervix and may cause no symptoms or may cause significant bleeding.

Acute pain resulting from myomas is uncommon and usually stems from 1 of 2 possibilities. Some pedunculated myomas can undergo torsion, causing the same severe pain as torsion of the ovary. Large myomas can also outgrow their blood supply, leading to infarction (degenerating myoma), which can be extremely painful.

Although general agreement is lacking on the mechanism, myomas are also thought to be related to infertility, fetal malpresentations, preterm labor, and IUGR. Possible mechanisms for infertility include distortion of the endometrial cavity and abnormal endometrial surface, thereby affecting both sperm transport and embryo implantation.12

Very rarely, myomas can be associated with erythrocytosis. This triad of myomatous uterus, erythrocytosis, and restoration and maintenance of normal hematologic values after hysterectomy is called myomatous erythrocytosis syndrome.13 A number of etiologies have been hypothesized, but alterations in erythropoietin levels seem likely.

Presentation

Most leiomyomata are small and do not cause symptoms. Many are found as incidental findings after an obstetric or gynecologic ultrasonographic examination (see Media file 3) or after a routine pelvic examination.

However, myomas can cause a number of symptoms. They can cause menstrual irregularities, particularly intermenstrual bleeding or menorrhagia. This bleeding usually begins gradually and progressively worsens as the responsible myoma enlarges. A regular menstrual pattern should be discernible within the extra bleeding. If no regular pattern is noted, an etiology such as chronic anovulation is more likely. Bleeding from chronic anovulation can be severely compounded if concomitant myomas are present.

Some patients present with progressive pelvic pressure, pelvic pain, or low back pain. The problems can also have many other possible etiologies; however, if they are noted in someone with a medium- or large-sized uterus (>14-15 weeks' size), the myomas are likely contributing. Some fibroid uteri can grow out of the pelvis and into the abdomen, where they can be palpated by the patient. This can be disturbing, even if the patient is having mild or no symptoms. Some are visible, distorting the abdominal wall and, at times, making the patient appear pregnant.

Most myomas grow slowly, and some remain relatively unchanged over prolonged periods. In the past, rapid growth was considered worrisome for leiomyosarcoma. In 1994, Parker et al showed that sarcoma was quite rare (0.27%), even in rapidly growing uteri, and that this risk was identical to stable myomas (0.21%).14 However, most of the patients were premenopausal. Rapid growth in postmenopausal women should be treated with greater caution.

The diagnosis of degenerating myoma should be considered in a patient with known fibroids and an acute onset of pelvic pain. This pain is generally acute in onset and can be quite severe. The patient can also develop fever and an elevated white blood cell count (without a left shift) that can be confused with infection. Upon examination, tenderness is usually quite specific and localized to the exact region of the degenerating myoma.

Infertility evaluations usually include an investigation for myomas, specifically submucosal myomas. Ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography (HSG), sonohysterography, or hysteroscopy are used frequently because submucosal myomas may not be detectable during pelvic examination.

Several unusual presentations can also occur. A prolapsed myoma (see Media file 4) is sometimes found after a routine speculum examination. A pedunculated myoma is a possible cause for an adnexal mass.

Indications

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists previously had criteria for hysterectomy for leiomyomata. Although this technical bulletin has been superseded by more recent ones that do not specify indications, these criteria are also reasonable for myomectomy. They are as follows:

  • Asymptomatic leiomyomata that are palpable abdominally and are a concern to the patient
  • Excessive uterine bleeding
    • Profuse bleeding
    • Anemia
  • Pelvic discomfort caused by myomata
    • Acute and severe
    • Chronic lower abdominal or low back pressure
    • Bladder pressure with urinary frequency not due to a urinary tract infection

All of these criteria are directed at relieving symptoms or improving quality of life by decreasing the patient's concerns. No indications exist for removing asymptomatic fibroids. Most of these patients never develop symptoms, and evidence does not support that earlier intervention improves long-term outcomes. An older argument proposed as an indication for hysterectomy, that the removal of uteri larger than 12 weeks' size improves the capability to detect adnexal masses, is also fallacious or obviated by ultrasonography. No evidence shows that routine pelvic examination improves the early detection of ovarian cancer. Similarly, no reason exists to believe that removing large uteri in an effort to make adnexa easier to examine would alter long-term ovarian cancer risk, detection, or outcome.

Additional criteria include the patient's interest in preserving her fertility or a personal preference of retaining her uterus. A definite risk exists for myoma recurrence after myomectomy and, with it, the need for a repeat surgical procedure in the future. If the patient no longer desires to retain her fertility or her uterus, hysterectomy is the usual procedure of choice. Interestingly, a number of women who have completed childbearing still request myomectomy for management of symptomatic myoma. This decision is usually motivated by patient preference and a desire to retain organs. Because the short-term risks of myomectomy compare favorably with hysterectomy15  and despite the risk of recurrence (ie, most patients do not require future surgery), a myomectomy is not unreasonable for appropriately counseled patients.

Although controversial, myomectomies are also performed for patients with infertility in the presence of uterine fibroids. Several papers suggest that patients with fibroids who are undergoing assisted reproductive technology procedures may have lower success rates compared with patients without fibroids.16,17 On the other hand, a retrospective evaluation of donor oocyte cycles in patients with IVF revealed no difference in pregnancy rates between women without fibroids and women with non—cavity-distorting fibroids.18

Importantly, no randomized studies have been performed to show improved pregnancy success rates after myomectomy. 
  
Current recommendations include consideration of myomectomy in infertile women after eliminating other causes of infertility and in patients with cavity-distorting submucosal myomas prior to IVF.12

Relevant Anatomy

Leiomyomata are usually confined to the myometrium but can occur in the lower uterine segment or cervix or can project out into the broad ligament. These myomas are frequently the most difficult to remove and are problematic during both hysterectomy and myomectomy.

Within the uterus, the myomas can be at any level within the uterine wall. Those mostly confined to the wall are termed intramural. Myomas projecting into the endometrial cavity are termed submucosal (see Media file 2), whereas myomas projecting outward from the uterus are subserosal (see Media file 1).

Some myomas are attached by pedicles, which can extend outward into the abdomen and may be confused with adnexal masses or can project into the endometrial cavity and cause bleeding. Some prolapse through the cervix (see Media file 4).

Contraindications

Myomectomy has a number of important contraindications. Myomectomy is not reasonable in the management of symptomatic leiomyomata in patients who no longer desire fertility or uterine preservation. It should not be performed if the patient possibly has endometrial cancer or uterine sarcoma. It should be avoided if the patient is pregnant. With the possible exception of otherwise unexplained infertility, it should not be performed in asymptomatic patients. No evidence whatsoever supports prophylactic myomectomy of asymptomatic myomas for decreasing the risk of any adverse outcome later in life.

Relative contraindications include the strong possibility that a functional uterus could not be reconstructed after excision of the myomas. For myomectomy to be considered successful, reconstructing the uterus with patent tubes must be possible. Leiomyomata located in the region of the uterine vessels or broad ligament are sometimes difficult to remove without performing a hysterectomy. If the patient has numerous small myomas, removing them and reconstructing the uterus in such a way as to support a future pregnancy may be impossible. Excision of very large leiomyomata that constitute the entire anterior or posterior wall of the uterus may leave defects so large that closure is prohibited. In addition, if adenomyosis is present, it is not amenable to resection and cannot be treated by myomectomy.

More on Gynecologic Myomectomy

Overview: Gynecologic Myomectomy
Workup: Gynecologic Myomectomy
Treatment: Gynecologic Myomectomy
Follow-up: Gynecologic Myomectomy
Multimedia: Gynecologic Myomectomy
References

References

  1. Speert H. Obstetrics and Gynecology in America: A History. Chicago, Ill: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 1980.

  2. Hutchins FL Jr. Abdominal myomectomy as a treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):781-9. [Medline].

  3. Wallach EE, Vlahos NF. Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2004;104(2):393-406. [Medline].

  4. Day Baird D, Dunson DB, Hill MC, et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2003;188(1):100-7. [Medline].

  5. Schwartz SM. Epidemiology of uterine leiomyomata. Clin Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2001;44(2):316-26. [Medline].

  6. Keshavaraz H, Hillis SD, Kieke BA, Marchbanks PA. Hysterectomy surveillance -- United States, 1994-1999. MMWR Suvveillance Summaries. 2002;51:(SS05):1-8. [Full Text].

  7. Greenberg MD, Kazamel TI. Medical and socioeconomic impact of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):625-36. [Medline].

  8. Mauskopf J, Flynn M, Thieda P, Spalding J, Duchane J. The Economic Impact of Uterine Fibroids in the United States: A Summary of Published Estimates. Journal of Womens Health. Oct 2005;14:692-703. [Medline].

  9. Walker C, Stewart E. Uterine Fibroids: The Elephant in the Room. Science. Jun 2005;308:1589-1592. [Medline].

  10. Ligon AH, Morton CC. Genetics of uterine leiomyomata. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Jul 2000;28(3):235-45. [Medline].

  11. Tiltman AJ. Smooth muscle neoplasms of the uterus. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Feb 1997;9(1):48-51. [Medline].

  12. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Myomas and reproductive function. Fertil Steril. Sep 2004;82 Suppl 1:S111-6. [Medline].

  13. LevGur M, Levie MD. The myomatous erythrocytosis syndrome: a review. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1995;86(6):1026-30. [Medline].

  14. Parker WH, Fu YS, Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. Mar 1994;83(3):414-8. [Medline].

  15. Iverson RE Jr, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, et al. Relative morbidity of abdominal hysterectomy and myomectomy for management of uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1996;88(3):415-9. [Medline].

  16. Stovall DW, Parrish SB, Van Voorhis BJ, et al. Uterine leiomyomas reduce the efficacy of assisted reproduction cycles: results of a matched follow-up study. Hum Reprod. Jan 1998;13(1):192-7. [Medline].

  17. Eldar-Geva T, Meagher S, Healy DL, et al. Effect of intramural, subserosal, and submucosal uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. Oct 1998;70(4):687-91. [Medline].

  18. Klatsky PC, Lane DE, Ryan IP, Fujimoto VY. The effect of fibroids without cavitary involvement on ART outcomes independent of ovarian age. Human Reproduction. Feb 2007;22:521-526. [Medline].

  19. Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Schruefer JJ, Simon JA. The nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1995;86(3):461-5. [Medline].

  20. Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 1999;19(5):1179-97. [Medline].

  21. Davis KM, Schlaff WD. Medical management of uterine fibromyomata. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):727-38. [Medline].

  22. Wu T, Chen X, Xie L. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for uterine leiomyomas. Cochrane Database of Systmatic Reviews. 2007;[Medline].

  23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Management of Uterine Fibroids: An Update of the evidence. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 154. AHRQ Publication No. 07-E011. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/tp/uteruptp.htm. Accessed July, 2007.

  24. Seinera P, Arisio R, Decko A, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: indications, surgical technique and complications. Hum Reprod. Sep 1997;12(9):1927-30. [Medline].

  25. Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1992;80(5):884-8. [Medline].

  26. Darai E, Dechaud H, Benifla JL, et al. Fertility after laparoscopic myomectomy: preliminary results. Hum Reprod. Sep 1997;12(9):1931-4. [Medline].

  27. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Kreiker G. Laparoscopic myomectomy and myolysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1997;9(4):233-8. [Medline].

  28. ACOG Committee Opinion. Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Uterine artery embolization. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Feb 2004;103(2):403-4. [Medline].

  29. Hurst BS, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. Jan 2005;83(1):1-23. [Medline].

  30. Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo, A, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertility and Sterility. Oct 2007;88:933-941. [Medline].

  31. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Mazzon I, Bramante S, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques. Hum Reprod Update. Mar-Apr 2008;14:101-19. [Medline].

  32. Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate?. Hum Reprod. Jun 2002;17:1424-30. [Medline].

  33. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B, Sowter M. Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;CD000547. [Medline].

  34. Deligdisch L, Hirschmann S, Altchek A. Pathologic changes in gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist analogue treated uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril. May 1997;67(5):837-41. [Medline].

  35. Celik H, Sapmaz E. Use of a single preoperative dose of misoprostol is efficacious for patients who undergo abdominal myomectomy. Fertil Steril. May 2003;79(5):1207-10. [Medline].

  36. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Silfen SL, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Fertil. Sep-Oct 1991;36(5):275-80. [Medline].

  37. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C. Laparoscopic myomectomy today. A good technique when correctly indicated. Hum Reprod. May 1996;11(5):934-5. [Medline].

  38. Parker WH, Rodi IA. Patient selection for laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Nov 1994;2(1):23-6. [Medline].

  39. Sinha R, Hegde A, Warty N, Patil N. Laparoscopic excision of very large myomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Nov 2003;10(4):461-8. [Medline].

  40. Zullo F, Pellicano M, De Stefano R, et al. A prospective randomized study to evaluate leuprolide acetate treatment before laparoscopic myomectomy: efficacy and ultrasonographic predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1998;178(1 Pt 1):108-12. [Medline].

  41. Campo S, Garcea N. Laparoscopic myomectomy in premenopausal women with and without preoperative treatment using gonadoptropin-releasing hormone analogs. Human Reproduction. Jan 1999;14:44-48. [Medline].

  42. Cohen LS, Valle RF. Role of vaginal sonography and hysterosonography in the endoscopic treatment of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. Feb 2000;73:197-204. [Medline].

  43. Perino A, Chianchiano N, Petronio M, et al. Role of leuprolide acetate depot in hysteroscopic surgery: a controlled study. Fertil Steril. Mar 1993;59:507-10. [Medline].

  44. Parazzini F, Vercellini P, De Giorgi O, et al. Efficacy of preoperative medical treatment in facilitating hysteroscopic endometrial resection, myomectomy and metroplasty: literature review. Human Reproduction. Sep 1998;13:2592-7. [Medline].

  45. Donnez J, Polet R, Smets M, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1995;7:311-6. [Medline].

  46. Campo S, Campo V, Gambadauro P. Short-term and long-term results of resectoscopic myomectomy with and without pretreatment with GnRH analogs in premenopausal women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. Aug 2005;84:756-760. [Medline].

  47. Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2006;96:266-70. [Medline].

  48. Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL, et al. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2000;96:517-20. [Medline].

  49. Agostini A, Cravello L, Shojai R, et al. Postoperative infection and surgical hysteroscopy. Fertility and Sterility. Apr 2002;77:766-768. [Medline].

  50. Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y. A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. Oct 2006;86:990-4. [Medline].

  51. Wheeless CR. Atlas of Pelvic Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997.

  52. Rock JA, Jones HW. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

  53. Frederick J, Fletcher H, Simeon D, et al. Intramyometrial vasopressin as a haemostatic agent during myomectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. May 1994;101(5):435-7. [Medline].

  54. DeLancey JO. A modified technique for hemostasis during myomectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Feb 1992;174(2):153-4. [Medline].

  55. Fletcher H, Frederick J, Hardie M, Simeon D. A randomized comparison of vasopressin and tourniquet as hemostatic agents during myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1996;87(6):1014-8. [Medline].

  56. Ginsburg ES, Benson CB, Garfield JM, et al. The effect of operative technique and uterine size on blood loss during myomectomy: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. Dec 1993;60(6):956-62. [Medline].

  57. Kongnyuy E, Wiysonge C. Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;[Medline].

  58. Tulandi T, Murray C, Guralnick M. Adhesion formation and reproductive outcome after myomectomy and second- look laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1993;82(2):213-5. [Medline].

  59. Parker W. Uterine myomas: management. Fertility and Sterility. Aug 2007;88:255-271. [Medline].

  60. Carter JE, McCarus SD. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Time and cost analysis of power vs. manual morcellation. J Reprod Med. Jul 1997;42(7):383-8. [Medline].

  61. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Bess O, et al. Laparoscopically assisted myomectomy: a report of a new technique in 57 cases. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. Jan-Feb 1994;39(1):39-44. [Medline].

  62. Zreik TG, Rutherford TJ, Palter SF, et al. Cryomyolysis, a new procedure for the conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Feb 1998;5(1):33-8. [Medline].

  63. Goldfarb HA. Laparoscopic coagulation of myoma (myolysis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):807-19. [Medline].

  64. Goldfarb HA. Nd:YAG laser laparoscopic coagulation of symptomatic myomas. J Reprod Med. Jul 1992;37(7):636-8. [Medline].

  65. Peacock K, Hurst BS. Laparoscopic Myomectomy. Surgical Technology International. 2006;15:141-145. [Medline].

  66. Nezhat FR, Roemisch M, Nezhat CH, et al. Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Aug 1998;5(3):237-40. [Medline].

  67. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod. Dec 2000;15(12):2663-8. [Medline].

  68. Rossetti A, Sizzi O, Soranna L, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic myomectomy: recurrence rate in comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod. Apr 2001;16(4):770-4. [Medline].

  69. Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, et al. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. Mar-Apr 2006;13:92-97. [Medline].

  70. Corson SL, Brooks PG. Resectoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril. Jun 1991;55(6):1041-4. [Medline].

  71. Corson SL. Hysteroscopic diagnosis and operative therapy of submucous myoma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;22(4):739-55. [Medline].

  72. Gimpelson RJ. Hysteroscopic treatment of the patient with intracavitary pathology (myomectomy/polypectomy). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Jun 2000;27(2):327-37, vii. [Medline].

  73. Donnez J, Gillerot S, Bourgonjon D, et al. Neodymium: YAG laser hysteroscopy in large submucous fibroids. Fertil Steril. Dec 1990;54(6):999-1003. [Medline].

  74. Brooks PG. Resectoscopic myoma vaporizer. J Reprod Med. Nov 1995;40(11):791-5. [Medline].

  75. Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K. The Intra Uterine Morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. Jan-Feb 2005;12:62-6. [Medline].

  76. Indman PD. Factors affecting capacitive current diversion with a uterine resectoscope: an in vitro study. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Feb 2004;11:128. [Medline].

  77. Indman PD. Hysteroscopic treatment of submucous myomas. Clin Obstet Bynecol. Dec 2006;49:811-20. [Medline].

  78. Murakami T, Tachibana M, Hoshiai T, et al. Successful strategy for the hysteroscopic myomectomy of a submucous myoma arising from the uterine fundus. Fertil Steril. Nov 2006;86:1513.e19-22. [Medline].

  79. Loffer FD. Removal of large symptomatic intrauterine growths by the hysteroscopic resectoscope. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1990;76:836-40. [Medline].

  80. Iverson RE Jr, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, et al. Myomectomy fever: testing the dogma. Fertil Steril. Jul 1999;72(1):104-8. [Medline].

  81. Blackwell R. Operative hysteroscopic procedures. In: Azzis R, Murphy AA, eds. Practical Manual of Operative Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1992:167-72.

  82. Ubaldi F, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Fertility after hysteroscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod Update. Jan 1995;1(1):81-90. [Medline].

  83. Vavala V, Lanzone A, Monaco A, et al. Postoperative GnRH analog treatment for the prevention of recurrences of uterine myomas after myomectomy. A pilot study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1997;43(4):251-4. [Medline].

  84. LaMorte AI, Lalwani S, Diamond MP. Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1993;82(6):897-900. [Medline].

  85. Sawin SW, Pilevsky ND, Berlin JA, Barnhart KT. Comparability of perioperative morbidity between abdominal myomectomy and hysterectomy for women with uterine leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 2000;183(6):1448-55. [Medline].

  86. Frederick J, Hardie M, Reid M, et al. Operative morbidity and reproductive outcome in secondary myomectomy: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. Nov 2002;17(11):2967-71. [Medline].

  87. Golan D, Aharoni R, Gonen Y, et al. Early spontaneous rupture of post myomectomy gravid uterus. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Feb 1990;31:167-170. [Medline].

  88. Ozeren M, Ulusoy M, Uyanik E. First-trimester spontaneous uterine rupture after traditional mymectomy: case report. Isr J Med Sci. Nov 1997;33:752-753. [Medline].

  89. Roopnarinesingh S, Suratsingh J, Roopnarinesingh A. The obstetric outcome of patients with previous myomectomy or hysterotomy. W.I. Med. J. Mar 1985;34:59-62. [Medline].

  90. Nkemayim DC, Hammadeh ME, Hippach M, et al. Uterine rupture in pregnancy subsequent to previous laparoscopic electromyolysis. Case report and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. Nov 2000;264(3):154-6. [Medline].

  91. Hockstein S. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the early third trimester after laparoscopically assisted myomectomy. A case report. J Reprod Med. Feb 2000;45(2):139-41. [Medline].

  92. Pelosi MA 3rd, Pelosi MA. Spontaneous uterine rupture at thirty-three weeks subsequent to previous superficial laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1997;177(6):1547-9. [Medline].

  93. Arcangeli S, Pasquarette MM. Gravid uterine rupture after myolysis. Obstet Gynecol. May 1997;89(5 Pt 2):857. [Medline].

  94. Paul P, Koshy A, Thomas T. Pregnancy outcomes following laparoscopic myomectomy and single-layer myometrial closure. Human Reproduction. Dec 2006;21:3278-3281. [Medline].

  95. Altgassen C, Kuss S, Berger U, et al. Complications in laparoscopic myomectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. Apr 2006;20:614-618. [Medline].

  96. Cooper JM, Brady RM. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of operative hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Jun 2000;27(2):347-66. [Medline].

  97. Emanuel MH, Hart A, Wamsteker K, et al. An analysis of fluid loss during transcervical resection of submucous myomas. Fertil Steril. Nov 1997;68:881-6. [Medline].

  98. Phillips DR, Nathanson HG, Milim SJ, et al. The effect of dilute vasopressin solution on blood loss during operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1996;88:761-766. [Medline].

  99. Corson SL, Brooks SG, Serden SP, et al. Effects of vasopressin administration during hysteroscopic surgery. J Reprod Med. Jun 1994;39:419-23. [Medline].

  100. Indman PD. Hysteroscopic treatment of menorrhagia associated with uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. May 1993;81(5 ( Pt 1)):716-20. [Medline].

  101. Hallez JP. Single-stage total hysteroscopic myomectomies: indications, techniques, and results. Fertil Steril. Apr 1995;63(4):703-8. [Medline].

  102. Vercellini P, Maddalena S, De Giorgi O, et al. Abdominal myomectomy for infertility: a comprehensive review. Hum Reprod. Apr 1998;13(4):873-9. [Medline].

  103. Fedele L, Parazzini F, Luchini L, et al. Recurrence of fibroids after myomectomy: a transvaginal ultrasonographic study. Hum Reprod. Jul 1995;10(7):1795-6. [Medline].

  104. Stewart EA, Faur AV, Wise LA, et al. Predictors of subsequent surgery for uterine leiomyomata after abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. Mar 2002;99(3):426-32. [Medline].

  105. Malone LJ. Myomectomy: recurrence after removal of solitary and multiple myomas. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1969;34(2):200-3. [Medline].

  106. Candiani GB, Fedele L, Parazzini F, Villa L. Risk of recurrence after myomectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Apr 1991;98(4):385-9. [Medline].

  107. Hanafi M. Predictors of leiomyoma recurrence after myomectomy. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Apr 2005;105:877-881. [Medline].

  108. Finn WF, Muller PF. Abdominal myomectomy: special reference to subsequent pregnancy and to the reappearance of fibromyomas of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul 1950;60(1):109-16. [Medline].

  109. Brown AB, Chamberlain R, Te Linde RW. Myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1956;71(4):759-63. [Medline].

  110. Berkeley AS, DeCherney AH, Polan ML. Abdominal myomectomy and subsequent fertility. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Mar 1983;156(3):319-22. [Medline].

  111. Garcia CR, Tureck RW. Submucosal leiomyomas and infertility. Fertil Steril. Jul 1984;42(1):16-9. [Medline].

  112. Rosenfeld DL. Abdominal myomectomy for otherwise unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. Aug 1986;46(2):328-30. [Medline].

  113. Smith DC, Uhlir JK. Myomectomy as a reproductive procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1990;162(6):1476-9; discussion 1479-82. [Medline].

  114. Verkauf BS. Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation. Fertil Steril. Jul 1992;58(1):1-15. [Medline].

  115. Gehlbach DL, Sousa RC, Carpenter SE, Rock JA. Abdominal myomectomy in the treatment of infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jan 1993;40(1):45-50. [Medline].

  116. Acien P, Quereda F. Abdominal myomectomy: results of a simple operative technique. Fertil Steril. Jan 1996;65(1):41-51. [Medline].

  117. Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Vianello F, et al. Obstetric and delivery outcome of pregnancies achieved after laparoscopic mymectomy. Fertility and Sterility. Jul 2006;86:159-165. [Medline].

  118. Griffiths A, D'Angelo A, Amso N. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;[Medline].

  119. Doridot V, Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, et al. Recurrence of leiomyomata after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Nov 2001;8(4):495-500. [Medline].

  120. Chapman R. New therapeutic technique for treatment of uterine leiomyomas using laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) by a minimally invasive method. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;22(3):171-8. [Medline].

  121. Vilos GA, Daly LJ, Tse BM. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic electromyolysis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Aug 1998;5(3):289-92. [Medline].

  122. Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertility and Sterility. Jan 2008;89:1-16. [Medline].

  123. Goldenberg M, Sivan E, Sharabi Z, et al. Outcome of hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas for infertility. Fertil Steril. Oct 1995;64(4):714-6. [Medline].

  124. Vercellini P, Zaina B, Yaylayan L, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: long-term effects on menstrual pattern and fertility. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1999;94(3):341-7. [Medline].

  125. Fernandez H, Sefrioui O, Virelizier C, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myomas in patients with infertility. Hum Reprod. Jul 2001;16(7):1489-92. [Medline].

  126. Bernard G, Darai E, Poncelet C, et al. Fertility after hysteroscopic myomectomy: effect of intramural myomas associated. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. Jan 2000;88(1):85-90. [Medline].

  127. Shokeir TA. Hysteroscopic management in submucous fibroids to improve fertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. Nov 2005;273(1):50-4. [Medline].

  128. Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K, Hart AA, et al. Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. May 1999;93(5 Pt 1):743-8. [Medline].

  129. Hart R, Molnar BG, Magos A. Long term follow up of hysteroscopic myomectomy assessed by survival analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Jul 1999;106(7):700-5. [Medline].

  130. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Clerckx F, et al. Advanced endoscopic techniques used in dysfunctional bleeding, fibroids and endometriosis, and the role of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. May 1994;101 Suppl 10:2-9. [Medline].

  131. Ben-Baruch G, Schiff E, Menashe Y, Menczer J. Immediate and late outcome of vaginal myomectomy for prolapsed pedunculated submucous myoma. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1988;72(6):858-61. [Medline].

  132. Siskin GP, Stainken BF, Dowling K, et al. Outpatient uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: experience in 49 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. Mar 2000;11(3):305-11. [Medline].

  133. Hurst BS, Stackhouse DJ, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. Nov 2000;74(5):855-69. [Medline].

  134. Gupta JK, Sinha AS, Lumsden MA, et al. Uterine artery emobolization for symptomatic uterine myomas. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;CD005073:[Medline].

  135. Goodwin SC, Spies JB, Worthington-Kirsch R, et al. Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry. Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2008;111:22-33. [Medline].

  136. Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J, et al. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: the Ontario multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2005;105(1):67-76. [Medline].

  137. Usadi RS, Marshburn PB. The impact of uterine artery embolization on fertility and pregnancy outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2007;19:279-283. [Medline].

  138. Stewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM, et al. Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertility and Sterility. Jan 2006;85:22-29. [Medline].

  139. Advincula AP, Song A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Aug 2007;19(4):331-6. [Medline].

  140. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG practice bulletin. Surgical alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas. Number 16, May 2000 (replaces educational bulletin number 192, May 1994). Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jun 2001;73(3):285-93. [Medline].

  141. Chiaffarino F, Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, et al. Diet and uterine myomas. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1999;94(3):395-8. [Medline].

  142. Dubuisson JB, Fauconnier A, Chapron C, et al. Reproductive outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy in infertile women. J Reprod Med. Jan 2000;45(1):23-30. [Medline].

  143. Miller CE, Johnston M, Rundell M. Laparoscopic myomectomy in the infertile woman. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Aug 1996;3(4):525-32. [Medline].

  144. Parker W, Iacampo K, Long T. Uterine rupture after laparoscopic removal of a pedunculated myoma. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. May-Jun 2007;14:362-364. [Medline].

  145. Römer T. Benefit of GnRH analogue pretreatment for hysteroscopic surgery in patients with bleeding disorders. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998;45 Suppl 1:12-20; discussion 21, 35. [Medline].

  146. Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, et al. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul 2003;189(1):48-54. [Medline].

  147. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Myomas and Reproductive Function. Ferility and Sterility. Nov 2006;86:S194-199. [Medline].

  148. Vikhlyaeva EM, Khodzhaeva ZS, Fantschenko ND. Familial predisposition to uterine leiomyomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Nov 1995;51(2):127-31. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

abdominal myomectomy, hysteroscopic myomectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy, uterine leiomyomas, uterine artery embolization, MR guided focused ultrasound, infertility, pregnancy, conception, myomas, leiomyomata, fibroids, hysterectomy, childbearing, uterine preservation, benign uterine growths, abnormal uterine bleeding, estrogen stimulation, smooth muscle tumors, intermenstrual bleeding, menorrhagia, menstrual irregularity

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Kerri L Marquard, MD, Fellow, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University School of Medicine
Kerri L Marquard, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

David Chelmow, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Program Director, Tufts University Affiliated Hospitals OB/GYN Residency Program; Chair, Tufts University Health Sciences Campus Institutional Review Board
David Chelmow, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Massachusetts Medical Society, Phi Beta Kappa, Sigma Xi, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, and Society for Medical Decision Making
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Edward G Evantash, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Associate Division Chief of General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Director of Center for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center
Edward G Evantash, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Disclosure: Cytyc Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Medical Editor

Thomas Michael Price, MD, Associate Professor of Reproductive Endocrinology, Director of Reproductive Fellowship Training Program, Duke University Medical Center
Thomas Michael Price, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Endocrine Society, Phi Beta Kappa, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, and South Carolina Medical Association
Disclosure: Clinical Advisors Group Consulting fee Consulting; MEDA Corp Consulting Consulting fee Consulting; Gerson Lehrman Group Advisor  Consulting fee Consulting; Roche/GSK Spokesperson  Consulting fee Consulting

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center
Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michel E Rivlin, MD, Professor, Coordinator, Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
Michel E Rivlin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Mississippi State Medical Association, and Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

RELATED EMEDICINE ARTICLES
Patient Education
 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.