Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Vesicovaginal Fistula Treatment & Management

  • Author: John Spurlock, MD; Chief Editor: Christine Isaacs, MD  more...
 
Updated: Mar 01, 2016
 

Medical Therapy

Conservative management

If VVF is diagnosed within the first few days of surgery, a transurethral or suprapubic catheter should be placed and maintained for up to 30 days. Small fistulas (< 1 cm) may resolve or decrease during this period if caution is used to ensure proper continuous drainage of the catheter.

In 1985, Zimmern concluded that if the fistula is small and the patient's vaginal leakage of urine is cured with Foley placement, the fistula has a high spontaneous cure rate with a 3-week trial of Foley drainage. He also noted that in general, if at the end of 30 days of catheter placement the fistula has diminished in size, a trial of continued catheter drainage for an additional 2-3 weeks may be beneficial. Finally, Zimmern concluded that if no improvement is observed after 30 days, a VVF is not likely to resolve spontaneously. Under these circumstances, prolonged catheterization only increases the risks of infection and offers no increased benefit to fistula cure.[18]

In their series, Davits and Miranda found complete resolution of 4 VVFs with continuous bladder drainage maintained for 19-54 days.[19] Tancer noted spontaneous closure in 3 of 151 patients (2%). In these 3 patients, continuous bladder catheterization was provided within 3 weeks of index hysterectomy; none had an epithelialized fistula tract, and 2 had transvesical sutures that were removed at the time of the initial cystoscopic examination. The size of the VVFs was not documented.

Elkins and Thompson noted some success with continuous bladder drainage. Unfortunately, the rate of success was unpredictable for the individual patient; the rates ranged from 12-80%. Successful cases were characterized by the following criteria: continuous bladder drainage for up to 4 weeks, the VVFs were diagnosed and treated within 7 days of index surgery, VVFs were less than 1 cm, and they were not associated with carcinoma or radiation.[20]

Next

Surgical Therapy

Surgical objectives or principles

Guidelines to follow intraoperatively to minimize VVF formation are identical to those followed at the time of index surgery to prevent a fistula complication.[21] A summary of these guidelines follows.

Adequate exposure of the operative field should be obtained to avoid inadvertent organ injury and to ensure prompt identification of any injury incurred.

Minimize bleeding and hematoma formation. The closure of dead space at the anterior vaginal wall upon completion of an anterior colporrhaphy will prevent hematoma formation. This technique employs intermittently incorporating pubocervicovaginal fascia with the vaginal mucosal layer as the vaginal wall is sutured.

Widely mobilize the bladder from the vagina during hysterectomy to diminish the risk of suture placement into the bladder wall. A minimum of a 1- to 2-cm margin of dissection of the bladder from the vaginal cuff should be developed prior to cuff closure.

Dissect the pubocervicovaginal endopelvic fascia between the vagina and the bladder in the appropriate plane. Dissection may be easier with a sharp technique compared to a blunt technique; the key is to prevent trauma and separation of bladder wall fibers as the bladder is mobilized off the anterior vaginal wall. The principle of traction and countertraction of the bladder and uterus works well to effect a bloodless dissection at the areolar pubocervicovaginal fascial plane.

If scarring is present at the pubocervicovaginal fascia and dissection is difficult, consider performing an intentional anterior extraperitoneal cystotomy. This technique enables the surgeon to assess the anatomic boundaries of the bladder wall with digital palpation. If scarring is present at the pubocervicovaginal fascia and dissection is difficult, consider employing an intrafascial technique of hysterectomy to best dissect the endopelvic fascial plane.

Intraoperative retrograde filling and emptying of the bladder or mild traction on a temporarily placed small Foley catheter inserted into the fistula itself are helpful to optimally identify anatomical planes and reveal intraoperative bladder lacerations.

Consider supracervical abdominal hysterectomy instead of TAH. The incidence of UGF formation is lower for supracervical versus total hysterectomy.

If an intraoperative bladder injury does occur, Tancer argues strongly for widely mobilizing the bladder from the underlying structures (fascia and vagina, cervix, or uterus). In doing so, the surgeon can effect a VVF closure under no tension.

For repairing a cystotomy at the trigonal area, a transverse closure is preferable over a vertical one. Vertical closure would be more likely to produce ureteral obstruction because the ureteral orifices would be drawn inward toward each other. Ureteral catheters should be considered in repair of a cystotomy involving or encroaching on ureteric orifices.

Consider performing cystourethroscopy when performing pelvic surgery. Cystourethroscopy to assure bilateral ureteral patency and the absence of suture placement in the bladder or the urethra has been advocated by some authors as a standard for all pelvic surgery.

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Timing of repair

The occurrence of a UGF is an anguishing experience for both the patient and the surgeon. The timing of repair should be dictated by the overall medical condition of the patient and the tissue quality surrounding the fistula. While the emotional status of the patient should not be underestimated, it also should not play a dominant role in the decision process of when to repair a VVF.

Controversy surrounds the length of delay between diagnosis and surgical repair of a noninfected VVF in a patient who has not undergone radiation treatment. Complicating the analysis of data is the fact that no definition has been established for "early" and "late" intervals. Traditionally, late referred to waiting for an 8- to 12-week interval between index surgery and repair. Longer intervals are universally accepted as the standard of care in infected or irradiated tissue. A 1-year interval for radiation-induced fistulas is recommended to ensure full resolution of tissue necrosis.

Margolis and Mercer simply recommend delaying surgery until inflamed and infected tissue has been treated and the infection and inflammation have resolved.[22] O'Conor agrees that the exact timing for repair depends on when the tissue health is adequate; most of his patients were brought to surgery approximately 3 months after index surgery. During the waiting period, he discouraged indwelling catheter usage and generally advocated vaginal estrogen therapy.[23] Consideration to adjunctive steroid therapy may be contemplated.

Carr and Webster suggest a strategy of examining the fistula at 2-week intervals and proceeding to surgery when the tissue is pliable, not infected, and not inflamed. In their experience, this typically occurred 4-8 weeks after index surgery.[24]

In Persky's series of 7 patients, a 100% success rate was noted with repair performed between 1 and 10 weeks. All of these patients had an interposition graft of peritoneum and omentum placed.[25]

In a retrospective analysis of 25 patients with VVF referred between 1970 and 1980, Blandy and colleagues noted success with all early and late repairs. Only 12 patients were referred before 6 weeks and, therefore, were candidates for early repair. The remaining 13 were referred after 6 weeks. The surgical technique used in all cases was midline cystotomy to the level of the fistula, ureteral catheterization, bladder mobilization from vagina, closure of the vaginal defect with 3-0 chromic catgut in interrupted fashion, and placement of an omental interposition graft. Urethral catheterization was used for 10-12 days. A suprapubic catheter also was placed in approximately half of the patients. Ureteral stents were removed after 5-10 days.[26]

Blaivas documented his philosophy "to repair fistulas as soon as possible and, preferably, by a vaginal approach" in his 1995 article that examined the repair of 24 VVFs between 1989 and 1993. Early repairs were defined as those that occurred within 12 weeks of index surgery. Success rates for early repair were similar to those for late repair as long as general principles of surgery were followed. He concluded that no benefit was noted by delaying surgery once evidence of any inflammation, induration, or infection was resolved.[27]

Lee found a correlation between increased surgical failure and VVF repair performed very early (10-15 d). In his experience, a delay of 8-12 weeks from index surgery or failed repair ensures a full resolution of inflammation and edema and provides an adequate blood supply, thereby optimizing success of VVF repair. However, he exempts certain cases from this general rule. These include fistulas diagnosed within hours of surgery and obstetrical lacerations.[28]

Contraindications to early closure of fistulas, as per Huang et al, include multiple unsuccessful closures in the past, an associated enteric fistula with pelvic phlegmon, or previous radiation. These types of fistulas require a delay in their repair of a minimum of 4-8 months and should include usage of an interposing flap/buttress.

Medications

Estrogen replacement therapy in the postmenopausal patient may assist with optimizing tissue vascularization and healing. Oral hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy (HRT/ERT) alone has been found to suboptimally estrogenize urogenital tissue in 40% of patients. Treatment with estrogen vaginal cream is recommended for patients with VVFs who are hypoestrogenic. A 4- to 6-week treatment regimen prior to surgery is commonly recommended. It may be used alone or in combination with oral HRT/ERT. Dosages range from 2-4 g placed vaginally at bedtime once per week. Alternatively, the patient may place 1 g vaginally at bedtime 3 times per week.

Corticosteroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy is theorized to minimize early inflammatory changes at the fistula site. However, its efficacy has not been proven. Because it also carries potential risks for impairment of wound healing, when early repair is planned, cortisone is not recommended for the treatment of VVF.

Acidification of urine to diminish risks of cystitis, mucus production, and formation of bladder calculi may be a consideration, particularly in the interval between the diagnosis and surgical repair of VVF. Vitamin C at 500 mg orally 3 times per day may be used to acidify urine. Alternatively, methenamine mandelate at 550 mg plus sodium acid phosphate at 500 mg 1-4 times per day also can be administered to achieve urine acidification.

Urised is effective for control of postoperative bladder spasms. It is a combination of antiseptics (methenamine, methylene blue, phenyl salicylate, benzoic acid) and parasympatholytics (atropine sulfate, hyoscyamine sulfate).

Sitz baths and barrier ointments, such as zinc oxide preparations, can provide needed relief from local ammoniacal dermatitis.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Antibiotic prophylaxis for VVF repair was the focus of study in a paper from the Benin Republic by Tomlinson and Thorton. In their series of 79 patients who underwent repair of a VVF by a single surgeon, they found intraoperative ampicillin did not reduce the odds of failed repair. However, patients given prophylactic antibiotic therapy did have fewer urinary infections and required less antibiotic therapy postoperatively.[29]

Patient positioning

The Lawson position is ideal for proximal urethral and bladder neck fistulas. The patient is placed in a prone position with the knees spread and ankles raised in the air and supported by stirrups. Combining it with reverse Trendelenburg positioning enhances visualization with this technique. Elkins found this technique to work best for him.[30]

The jackknife position is ideal for proximal urethral and bladder neck fistulas. The patient is placed in a prone position with the hips abducted and flexed and the table jackknifed.

The dorsal lithotomy positionwith standard Trendelenburg positioning provides excellent access for repair of a high VVF.

To excise or not to excise: The fistula tract excision debate

In their experiences, Raz,[31] Vasavada, and Margolis and Mercer[22] note that routine excision of the fistula tract is not mandatory. They emphasize the risks of increasing the size of the fistula tract with attempts to resect it. Additionally, these surgeons contend that the fibrous ring of the fistula may add to the strength of the repair and prevent postoperative bladder spasms. Cruikshank reported a 100% success rate in his series of 11 patients with fistula repair without tract excision.[32] Elkins and Thompson state that a small fistula may be resected, but large tracts should only be freshened. They warn of the risk of overexcising fistula edges, thereby causing an increase in the size of the fistula. They point out further risks of intracystic bleeding and blood clot formation from the mucosal edge of the bladder with fistula resection. Subsequent blockage of the catheter postoperatively would then increase the risk of failure of the VVF repair.[20]

However, Iselin and colleagues strongly feel excision of the fistula tract ensures closure of all layers with viable tissue, thereby optimizing wound healing. In their series of 20 patients who had undergone hysterectomy, a 100% cure rate was obtained with full excision of the fistula tract. They emphasize lack of complications, such as symptomatic vaginal shortening, with their technique.[33]

De-epithelialization of the fistula tract can be accomplished by various techniques. Screw curette is one method. In 1977, Aycinena described the use of a common type of screw to strip away or curet the epithelial lining of small VVFs. He then simply allowed spontaneous healing to occur. Seven patients were reported in this series, all of whom were treated successfully.[34] Experts in the field caution that this procedure is efficacious only in the smallest of VVFs. Other methods used to de-epithelialize the fistula tract include electrocoagulation and sharp knife dissection.

Techniques of repair

The best chance for a surgeon to achieve successful repair is by using the type of surgery with which he or she is most familiar. Techniques of repair include (1) the vaginal approach, (2) the abdominal approach, (3) electrocautery, (4), fibrin glue, (5) endoscopic closure using fibrin glue with or without adding bovine collagen, (6) the laparoscopic approach, and (7) using interposition flaps or grafts.[35, 36]

The literature documents excellent success rates for both the vaginal and abdominal approaches if the following general surgical principles are followed: (1) complete preoperative diagnosis, (2) exposure, (3) hemostasis, (4) mobilization of tissue, (5) tissue closure under no tension, (6) watertight closure of bladder with any cystotomy repair, (7) timing to avoid infection and inflammation of tissue, (8) adequate blood supply at area of repair, and (9) continuous catheter drainage postoperatively.

Vaginal approach

Minimal blood loss, low postoperative morbidity, shorter operative time, and shorter postoperative recovery time are characteristics of the vaginal approach, making it an attractive option. Additionally, the vaginal approach obviates bowel manipulation, reducing operative morbidity, particularly in patients with radiation-associated fistulas. Angioli et al emphasize that the absolute contraindications for vaginal repair of VVF are the concomitant presence of fistulas with other abdominopelvic organs, such as ureters and small and large bowel, and multiple VVFs.[21]

Exposure

Consider the following for exposure:

  • Suturing of the labial folds to the ipsilateral thigh provides improved visibility of the vaginal vault.
  • Procedures used to facilitate exposure in the vagina include Dührssen and Schuchardt incisions. As early as 1856, Baker advocated the use of an episiotomy incision to afford greater exposure in the vaginal repair of fistulas that were located high in the vaginal vault. Vaginal incisions used to improve exposure include the Dührssen incision and the Schuchardt incision.
  • The Dührssen incision is a deep vaginoperineal incision or extended episiotomy initially proposed for usage in other types of vaginal surgery. Its application to fistula surgery was recommended by Mackenrodt in 1894. [7]
  • In 1893, Schuchardt introduced a parasacral incision as an extension of a Dührssen incision, whereby a deep vaginoperineal incision is carried cephalad to the vault apex and then posteriorly toward the tip of the coccyx. Schuchardt's paravaginal incision is performed by incising the posterior vaginal wall in a direction angled toward the ischial tuberosity, going through the levator ani and the coccygeus muscle, to ultimately gain access into the ischiorectal fossa. [4]
  • In 1984, Maisonneuve described the same procedure in his attempts to gain better access in vaginal repair of fistulas. Hemorrhage is an expected complication encountered using this technique. The obstetrician's mediolateral episiotomy procedure is a modified Schuchardt paravaginal incision. [6]

Catheterization of the fistula tract

Exposure and access to a VVF can be facilitated by catheterization of the fistula with a bulb catheter, such as a Fogarty catheter. An uninflated catheter may thread the fistula where the bulb is inflated, then traction is placed on the catheter to draw the VVF into the field. A small VVF may be probed first with a lacrimal duct probe and dilated with cervical dilators to permit placement of a pediatric catheter/ureteral bulb catheter.

Low-tension closure

Consider the following for low-tension closure:

  • The critical issue of closure of suture lines without any tension is a tenet of surgical repair of VVF. In an attempt to reduce strain at the site of anterior vaginal wall closures, surgeons employ several strategies, including extensive vaginal wall dissection and mobilization from the underlying vesicovaginal endopelvic fascia.
  • Alternatively, a surgeon may opt to create lateral radial or circumferential relaxing incisions similar to those first described by Jobert de Lamballe in the mid 1800s. [1] The relaxing incisions are the full thickness of the vaginal wall without extension into the endopelvic fascia. The margins are not reapproximated; instead, they may be sutured in running fashion for desired hemostasis.
  • A significant danger to performing lateral relaxing incisions is further devascularization of the vaginal tissue. An alternative approach that avoids this potential complication is to employ vascularized flaps or grafts at the site of fistula repair, such as a Martius bulbocavernosus fibromuscular pedicle with or without an intact skin patch. Such grafts are essential in the repair of large fistulas and radiotherapy-related fistulas, where large areas of devascularized and scarred vaginal walls commonly are observed (see Interposition flaps and grafts).

Surgical procedures for the vaginal approach

Latzko partial colpocleises procedure

Numerous authors hold this time-honored procedure, with success rates of 93-100%, to be the standard for repair of simple posthysterectomy VVFs.

In 1942, Latzko published his modification of the Simon colpocleisis procedure designed for repair of obstetric VVFs. The Simon colpocleisis technique applied a transverse closure of the vagina beneath the fistula defect. Unfortunately, it often resulted in the formation of a symptomatic diverticulum between the bladder and cervix. Latzko advocated the prerequisite of total hysterectomy to obviate such a complication. Additionally, he strongly cautioned strict adherence to 2 additional prerequisite conditions. First, adequate preoperative vaginal vault length must be present because the vagina is shortened by 1.5 cm. Second, the fistula must be located at the vaginal apex "so that the posterior margin of the fistula and the scar of the vaginal vault coincide."[8]

Advantages of the Latzko procedure include simplicity of technique, high success rate, low morbidity, no impairment in bladder capacity, and no compromise of ureteral orifices, even with fistulas lying close to the orifices.

Several surgeons describe symptomatic vaginal vault foreshortening with the Latzko procedure. However, in the experience of Elkins and Thompson, significant shortening in vaginal length was not noted unless the patient had antecedent shortening.[20]

In performing the Latzko procedure, Robertson found he never needs to place a ureteral catheter, even when the fistula margin lies adjacent to a ureteral orifice, because the ureter is turned into the bladder, preventing ureteral occlusion. Some authors state that the presence of a cervix is a contraindication for a Latzko procedure. However, Elkins and Thompson do not agree. They report that a juxtacervical VVF can be repaired vaginally if the cervix can be drawn down adequately out of the surgical field of closure.[20]

The Latzko technique

The vaginal mucosa is sharply denuded in a circular fashion at a distance of 1.5 cm from the fistula opening. The fistula at the bladder mucosa is not disturbed. A double row of sagittally oriented sutures is placed in the raw surfaces on either side of the fistula, with the second row imbricating the first. Suturing of the vaginal wall is then performed, providing a third layer of closure. The vaginal wall in contact with the bladder becomes the posterior vesical wall and eventually is reepithelialized with transitional epithelium

Flap-splitting techniques

In this technique, the vaginal wall is incised circumferentially around the fistula and widely dissected from the underlying endopelvic fascia in a standard anterior colporrhaphy technique. Leaving the tract unresected, the bladder is closed, tension-free, in 2 layers. The surgery is completed with the vaginal closure over the bladder defect.

Elkins, DeLancey, and McGuire published their experiences with repair of VVF from January 1985 through May 1989. Martius grafts were needed as an adjunctive technique to a flap-splitting technique in less than 40% of cases. They did not find adjunctive techniques necessary when the genital tract fistulas were small (≤4 cm), nonrecurrent, well vascularized, and not radiation-induced.[37]

Numerous surgeons, such as Margolis and Mercer,[22] and Raz,[31] have found this procedure as efficacious as the Latzko technique. It has better applicability for large VVFs while not foreshortening the vaginal vault. The authors note the risk of possible ureteral compromise.

Technique

The vaginal wall is incised circumferentially around the fistula, leaving a rim of intact vaginal wall encircling the fistula tract. At the lateral sides of the fistula incision, the skin incisions are extended toward the vaginal apex in a parallel fashion. One incision is carried further than the other, thereby incising a J shape in the vaginal wall.

The anterior and posterior flaps are widely dissected from the underlying endopelvic fascia. The fistula tract is closed with 3-0 chromic or Dexon suture in a continuous fashion. This closure includes the full thickness of vaginal skin previously left intact at the fistula tract, along with the partial thickness of the bladder wall.

A second layer of closure in the endopelvic fascia is performed with 3-0 Dexon suture; it is placed perpendicular to the prior suture line. The distal vaginal flap is trimmed. The proximal flap is advanced beyond the fistula repair site, reaching the trimmed distal margin, and reapproximated in a running fashion.

Zimmern et al describe their preference for an asymmetric J incision in the anterior vaginal wall whereby the lower curve of the J loops around the fistula site. This modification enables the surgeon to advance one flap over the fistula repair and prevent overlapping suture lines. Martius grafts were added in cases where fistula closure was tenuous. Tension-free closure of viable tissue, avoidance of overlapping suture lines, and continuous postoperative bladder drainage were factors considered crucial to success. Their 1-year success rates ranged from 90-100%.[18]

Vaginal cuff excision

Technique

The patient is placed in dorsal lithotomy position. Cystoscopy is performed. Traction on the fistula site is obtained by placing a Foley catheter into the fistula tract from a vaginal approach, inflating the balloon, and placing traction sutures at 1-cm distances from the fistula. The vaginal mucosa is denuded circumferentially for a radius of 3-5 mm from the vaginal cuff, including the fistula. This incision is then extended obliquely to the bladder wall so as to resect the fistula tract and vaginal cuff scar in a funnel-shaped specimen.

The defect is closed in 4 layers. First, the bladder is closed with interrupted 4-0 sutures; the subvaginal pubocervicovaginal fascia then is closed in 2 layers with interrupted 3-0 sutures. This is followed by a vaginal wall closure. Each of the 4 layers used polyglycolic acid suture material.

Intravenous indigo carmine and cystoscopy is used to ensure bladder and ureteral integrity. A suprapubic catheter is the preferred method of bladder drainage and is maintained for approximately 3 weeks postoperatively.

The premise on which Iselin and colleagues base their surgical technique is that scarred tissue margins do not heal well, if at all. In comparison, fresh viable margins provide for optimal results in the repair of posthysterectomy VVF. They advocate a total excision of the fistula tract and vaginal cuff scar. In their series of 20 patients, all were successfully repaired and no symptomatic vaginal shortening or other complications were encountered.[33]

Flynn et al, in their retrospective study of 40 patients who underwent vaginal cuff scar excision for VVF repair from February 1998 to December 2002, reported a 100% success rate at the 3-month postoperative evaluation. They also reported at this evaluation that 94% of the patients denied urinary dysfunction problems and of the 34 patients who had resumed sexual activity, only 2 women complained of mild deep dyspareunia.[38]

Abdominal approach

As with the transvaginal approach, exposure with the transabdominal approach can be augmented with the use of traction sutures and with catheterization of the fistula with a Fogarty catheter. Similarly, in 1893, Weinlechner proposed the use of a ball with an attached wire in the combined transvaginal and transabdominal repair of VVF. The wire was threaded through the fistula transvaginally and then grasped through the cystotomy. Traction on the wire elevates the tract into the surgical field.[39]  

Absolute indications for abdominal approach include the following:

  • The need for concomitant abdominal surgery, such as augmentation cystoplasty and ureteral reimplantation
  • The inability to adequately expose the fistula vaginally
  • A complex presentation of VVF involving the ureters, bowel, or other intraabdominal structures
  • Involvement of the VVF with ureteric orifices (Langkilde)

The classic positioning of the patient for abdominal procedures is supine, with Trendelenburg orientation. However, modifying this by flexing the patient's hips and abducting and supporting her legs in stirrups is wise. Simultaneous access and examination of the vaginal vault may assist with laparotomy procedures.

The choice of incision may include suprapubic V, Pfannenstiel, or midline vertical. In 1887, Bardenheuer recommended a transverse suprapubic incision.[40] Turner-Warwick et al prefer the suprapubic V incision, noting that it provides superior access to the lower abdomen and pelvis.[41] Several others advocate a longitudinal suprapubic incision because it allows the surgeon the ability to more easily obtain an omental graft.

Transvesical extraperitoneal technique

In 1885, Trendelenburg introduced the first transvesical extraperitoneal method of vesicovaginal repair.[5] With the patient placed in a steep Trendelenburg position, a transvesical incision is performed to visualize the fistula. The bladder mucosa adjacent to the fistula is circumscribed and removed. The bladder is dissected off the vagina and the bladder, and vaginal defects are closed separately.

Transperitoneal technique

The transperitoneal technique was developed by von Dittel in 1803 for the repair of VVFs.[42] In his procedure, a laparotomy was performed. The bladder was dissected from underlying gynecologic organs involved. The defects in the bladder and vagina or cervix were closed separately.

In 1913, Legueu described his transvesical transperitoneal suprapubic method. He combined both the Trendelenburg and the von Dittel techniques, whereby the peritoneal cavity is accessed by laparotomy and a sagittal incision is made in the bladder. This cystotomy incision is extended to the fistula. The bladder is mobilized off the vagina, and the bladder and vaginal defects are closed separately.[43]

Unfortunately, transperitoneal surgeries were technically complex and fraught with high morbidity and mortality at the time. Unless ureteral or coabdominal surgery was necessary, numerous surgeons (eg, Fritsch, Wertheim, Latzko) favored the vaginal approach techniques.

In the age of modern medicine, surgeons have the benefit of performing invasive surgeries with sterile fields, antibiotics, and other medical advances. As such, Margolis and Mercer[22] and O'Conor and Sokol[44] find the extravesical transperitoneal procedure of great benefit when the bladder is densely adhered to the endopelvic fascia and underlying structures (eg, lower uterine segment, cervix, anterior vaginal wall).

O'Conor and Sokol technique

The O'Conor and Sokol technique was introduced as an intraperitoneal or transperitoneal technique. In 1951, O'Conor and Sokol published a Legueu-type technique for the suprapubic repair of trigonal and supratrigonal VVFs.[44] According to an article published by O'Conor in 1980, O'Conor and Sokol developed their technique after they observed Barnes' technique for the resection of adherent bladder diverticula in 1934. O'Conor then was able to trace Barnes' technique back to a similar procedure performed by Ward; he disclaims any claim to originality of their procedure. To their credit, their large studies, with success rates higher than 85%, did much to popularize the suprapubic technique.

Among the successful cases of repaired VVF are patients with complex and difficult repairs, such as radiation-associated cases. The authors stressed that it was key to bisect and widely mobilize the bladder from the vagina in order to produce a closure with separate tension-free layers.

The procedure can be performed extraperitoneally; however, in complex cases, the transperitoneal approach is preferred because it allows for the addition of interposition grafts. Advocates of their technique cite the advantages of high success rate, optimum surgical access to the fistula and ureters, and the ability to add an interposition graft with this procedure.

The O'Conor and Sokol technique consists of using an infraumbilical incision to perform a laparotomy and then enter the peritoneal cavity. The posterior wall of the bladder is dissected free as much as possible. The bladder then is bivalved at the dome. This incision is extended posteriorly to the level of the fistula. Stay sutures are placed sequentially along the incisional margins every few centimeters to permit traction and elevation of the bladder wall in order to aid in exposure and dissection.

Ureteral orifices and the location of fistula(s) are identified, and ureteral catheters are placed if necessary. The fistula tract and scarred and necrotic tissue are resected. Dissection of the posterior wall of the bladder from the underlying endopelvic fascia and vagina is completed. The bladder and vagina are closed in separate layers. The bladder is closed with a 2-0 chromic suture in continuous running fashion beginning at the apex and extending through the full muscle layers and imbricated with a second layer with interrupted 1-0 chromic sutures. Commonly, peritoneal or interposition grafts are added. A suprapubic catheter is brought out laterally to the sagittal closure. A transurethral catheter may be placed and discontinued on postoperative day 4 or 5; the suprapubic catheter is removed on postoperative day 14.

Vesical autoplasty

Gil-Vernet and colleagues presented a bladder wall flap procedure in 1989 as an alternative technique for the repair of complicated VVF. The approach may be transvesical, extraperitoneal, or transperitoneovesical. Advantages cited by the authors are the capability of repairing large VVFs without compromising bladder capacity, a low-tension closure, direct and easy identification, and preservation of the submucosal ureteral portion.

In the vesical autoplasty technique, the bladder is entered through a transverse incision at the dome. Catheterization of the ureters is performed. The fistula tract is completely excised with the assistance of stay sutures secured around the fistula tract. The bladder wall is carefully mobilized off the endopelvic fascia and vaginal wall. The vaginal defect is closed with a single-layer closure. A bladder flap is constructed to close the bladder defect. Incisions are made at the superolateral angles of the bladder defect and extended cephalad toward the dome.

The anterior margin of the flap is drawn down over the bladder defect to meet the caudal margin of the bladder defect. It is sutured in place with 3-0 catgut through the submucosal and muscular layers in interrupted fashion with sutures not less than 10 mm apart. The ureteral catheters are removed, and the anterior cystotomy is closed in a single extramucosal layer. When a transperitoneal approach is chosen, Gil-Vernet prefers to also add an interpositiongraft.[45]

Bladder mucosal autologous grafts

The use of autologous bladder mucosa grafts was first introduced in 1947 as a technique designed for urethral reconstruction. Since that time, research performed in a canine model by J.W. Coleman and his associates at Cornell University demonstrated that autographs of bladder mucosa as large as 4 cm could be used successfully to cover large defects in canine bladder walls.[46] The application of a free bladder mucosal graft for repair of difficult VVF was developed by Ostad and his associates.[47] They published their series of 6 patients with a 100% success rate. The follow-up interval ranged from 2-6 years.

All of the VVFs were high, large, multiple, or recurrent and occurred posthysterectomy; one patient had a history of pelvic irradiation. Three were repaired early (< 3 mo from index surgery), and 3 were repaired late. Simplicity of technique, high success rates, lack of the need for interposition grafts, and decreased patient morbidity were notable advantages to this procedure. Exact fistula sizes were not documented. Reepithelialization of the denuded mucosa donor site is believed to occur spontaneously over the following 4-6 weeks.

The technique of bladder mucosal autologous grafts consists of the following. After gaining access to the peritoneal cavity with either a Pfannenstiel or infraumbilical low vertical midline incision, an extraperitoneal cystotomy is performed at the anterior bladder wall. Ureteral catheters are placed. Bladder mucosa is denuded circumferentially at the fistula site at a distance of 1 cm. The fistula tract and vaginal wall are left undisturbed. A free bladder mucosal graft is sharply dissected from its underlying muscularis layer at the edge of the anterior cystotomy margin. This graft of mucosa is then secured over the fistulous tract with interrupted 4-0 chromic catgut sutures that are placed into the superficial muscularis at a distance of 2-3 cm. The anterior cystotomy is closed in 2 layers. A transurethral catheter is used for 24 hours. A suprapubic Malecot drain is left in place for 2-3 weeks, and a cystogram is obtained prior to its removal.

Electrocautery

In a series of 15 patients, Stovsky et al reported a 73% cure rate with electrocoagulation in a highly selected patient group. The fistulas that were successfully managed with electrocautery as the sole treatment modality were small in size. Only 4 fistulas were large enough to be cystoscopically identified with a true fistula opening; the remaining 11 were identified as either pinhole openings or bladder mucosal dimples. Details of their technique include both vaginal and cystoscopic routes and fulguration with a Bugbee electrode and placement of a large Foley catheter for a minimum of 2-3 weeks. Care was taken to use low-current settings in order to minimize the potential of thermal damage and enlargement of the fistula.[48]

However, Margolis and Mercer in 1994 concluded the risk of destruction of viable tissue with usage of electrocoagulation in the repair of fistulas is too great to warrant its application. They classified this technique as worthy of historical interest only.[49]

Fibrin glue

Cronkite et al introduced fibrin glue in the 1940s. They combined fibrinogen and thrombin for use as a sealant in skin grafting procedures. Success was unpredictable, and this technique was largely abandoned until the 1970s. Matras and associates published their experiences with fibrin glue for interfascicular nerve repair in animals in 1972.[50] In 1985, Matras reported on the use of a fibrin sealant in maxillofacial surgery.[51]

Occlusion therapy using fibrin glue is considered useful and safe for intractable fistulas. Fibrin glue facilitates healing by recruiting macrophages and providing a semisolid support structure rich in growth and angiogenic factors. This system continues to support the fibroblast to connective tissue transition.

Most of the data are from European investigators because the US Food and Drug Administration regulated against commercially prepared fibrin agents until recently. A fibrin-sealant technique has been used to treat a variety of fistula types, including pancreatic, maxillofacial, enterocutaneous, anorectal, bronchopleural, and gastrocutaneous. Proponents of its use note that it is used as a minimally invasive and technically simple outpatient surgery that lacks significant morbidity. The commercial fibrin glue presently used in the United States is Tisseel.

Fibrin occlusion of a VVF was first developed by Pettersson and associates in 1979.[52] The VVF was incurred following surgery and radiotherapy and was cured with the first attempt. Encouraged by this, Hedelin et al performed the technique in their series of 9 patients with chronic fistulas of 7 months to 10 years in duration; all had undergone at least one prior surgical repair attempt. They demonstrated a 50% success rate in treating vesicocutaneous fistulas, with failure in a single patient with VVF. The VVF was 2 cm long; width was not reported.[53]

In 1998, Venkatesh and Ramanujam published their experiences using autologous fibrin glue to treat 30 patients with recurrent anorectal and urethrovesicorectal fistulas. All patients had undergone at least one prior failed surgery to repair their fistulas. Granulation tissue was removed by curettage; extensive debridement was not necessary. Cryoprecipitate and thrombin were dispensed simultaneously into the fistula tract, filling it immediately with the coagulum. Approximately half of the patients required 2 applications. The overall success rate was 60%. Failure rates were high if the tract was short and straight. The 2 urethrovesicorectal fistulas failed to heal, and the authors presumed urinary contamination played a role in the mechanism.[54]

Tsurusaki et al reported on a case in which fibrin glue was used successfully to heal an intractable kidney transplant ureteral fistula. Urinary leakage occurred from a ureterocutaneous fistula at the ureteroureterostomy site. The tract was injected from the cutaneous side on postoperative days 104, 121, and 136 under x-ray fluoroscopic guidance. Success was achieved immediately on the third injection. The stent and nephrostomy tube were removed, and no recurrence was noted at the time of publication 11 months later. For optimal success, they mandate delineating the fistula by radiographic techniques before fibrin occlusion therapy and caution proper placement of the double-lumen catheter before injection.[55] Recently, Sharma et al reported successful treatment of VVF with fibrin glue in 8 patients.[56]

Electrocautery and endoscopic closure using fibrin glue and bovine collagen

Morita and Tokue published a case report of successful closure of a radiation-induced and markedly fibrosed VVF measuring 5 mm. They buttressed the fibrin glue in the fistula tract between collagen cushions at the proximal and distal sites of the fistula to prevent its mechanical disruption by the efflux of urine from the bladder.[57]

The technique of electrocautery and endoscopic closure using fibrin glue and bovine collagen consists of the following. After performing electrocoagulation of the fistula, a cystoscope was introduced transurethrally into the bladder, and 1 mm of bovine collagen was injected submucosally under direct visualization around the fistula opening. Fibrin glue was injected transvaginally into the fistula tract. A second application of 1 mm of bovine collagen was then injected transvaginally into the vaginal mucosal layer around the fistula tract. A transurethral Foley was used for 3 weeks.

Laser welding

Dogra and Nabi reported their success in the repair of a 3-mm VVF in the supratrigonal area of the bladder. They used a Nd-Yag laser to fulgurate the fistula opening and the full tract. A transurethral catheter was used for 3 weeks. The authors emphasize that the Nd-Yag laser has the advantage over electrocoagulation of precise and accurate destruction of the areas involved.[58]

Laparoscopic approach

Nezhat and colleagues assessed the laparoscopic closure of intentional and unintentional bladder lacerations in a series of 20 cystotomies. In this study, the only complication noted was a single VVF that required reoperation. This fistula was successfully repaired laparoscopically with a single-layer closure. In another laparoscopic dissection for benign disease, a VVF resulted postoperatively and was successfully repaired laparoscopically at a later surgery.[59] Also, see Omental J flap.

Sotelo et al demonstrated a 93% cure rate in the laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistulas in 15 selected patients who had clear indications for abdominal approach surgical treatment. Their technique involved cystoscopy, catheterization of the fistula tract, dissection of the bladder from the vagina, laparoscopic cystotomy, excision of the tract, adequate dissection of the bladder from the vaginal wall, cystotomy, and colpotomy closure with interposition of a flap of healthy tissue.[60]

Melamud and colleagues reported their successful attempt in the repair of a VVF in a 44-year-old woman. Their approach was a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach using the DaVinci robotic system. In their technique they added fibrin glue between the bladder and vagina to separate the suture lines. Factors contraindicating a vaginal approach surgical technique were not elucidated in this paper.[61]

Javali et al described a simplified laparoscopic approach of VVF which consisted of limited cystotomy, single-layer bladder closure with 3-0 V-Loc barbed suture and omental patch over the vaginal opening.[62]

Agrawal et al reported that robot-assisted laparoscopic VVF repair is an effective approach to manage VVF even in complex medical scenarios.[63]

Transurethral suture cystorrhaphy (TUSC)

McKay reported his results using transurethral suture cystorrhaphy in his initial series of 5 patients with VVF. In selected cases of small uncomplicated vesicovaginal fistulas with a maximum of 5-6 mm, he concluded that this technique offered multiple advantages including minimal intervention, outpatient setting, reduced operating time, and reduced morbidity.[64] Essential to the technique are suprapubic visualization with a shorter scope such as an arthroscope, large-caliber sheaths used transurethrally to allow passage of relatively large curved needles, self-righting needle driver, and adequate fulguration of the fistula tract and the surrounding bladder mucosa.

Interposition flaps or grafts

Rotated vascularized pedicle flaps are an important adjunct to surgical techniques used in the repair of VVF. They increase success by enhancing granulation tissue formation, increasing neovascularity to the area, and obliterating dead space. They also provide a barrier layer between the bladder suture line and the vaginal suture line. Elkins cautions not to expect this procedure to provide structural periurethral support and not to expect success if the fistulous space is not completely closed, closed under tension, or closed with only nonviable tissue.[30]

Vaginal approach interposition grafts or flaps includes the following:

  • Martius flap
  • Full-thickness fasciocutaneous Martius flaps
  • Gracilis muscle flap
  • Peritoneal flap

Martius flap

Martius first described his procedure in 1928 as a technique used in VVF repair.[10] He isolated the bulbocavernosus muscle and its overlying fibroadipose tissue as a pedicled graft for VVF repair. Its application today extends to numerous types of vaginoplasties performed for urethral, vaginal, and rectal disorders that include VVF, vaginal scarring and atresia, urethrovaginal fistulas, and rectovaginal fistulas.

Various modifications of Martius' original procedure have been published. Success rates range from 85-100%. Elkins, DeLancey, and McGuire describe a modified Martius graft technique used in their series of 37 complex fistulas in 35 patients. In their 1990 publication, 12 patients had large obstetric VVF (>4 cm), 6 patients had obstetric fistulas with urethral sloughing, 6 patients had recurrent obstetric or posthysterectomy fistulas, 5 had radiation-induced fistulas, and 6 had rectovaginal fistulas. They observed an 86.5% success rate.[37]

In their modification, only the fibroadipose tissue in the labium majus was isolated. It was composed of fibrous septa, round ligament, and a superficial fibrous layer; it did not contain bulbocavernosus muscle. These surgeons highlight the risk of hemorrhage with the classic Martius graft technique because it requires a deep plane of dissection to isolate the bulbocavernosus muscle. The fibroadipose tissue isolated in their dissection possessed sufficient blood supply and strength for success. Additionally, they note that the dual blood supply to this tissue and the bulbocavernosus muscle (dorsally via internal pudendal artery and ventrally via external pudendal artery) enables the surgeon the choice of using a flap with a superior or inferior base. Of note, mild dyspareunia over the graft site is a potential complication, which may be difficult to avoid and remedy.

The Martius technique was modified by Elkins, DeLancey, and McGuire. A vaginal flap-splitting procedure is performed with wide tissue mobilization. A double row of inverting interrupted sutures is placed in the bladder. The bladder is back-filled with methylene blue to assure closure integrity. Then, 3-4 chromic stay sutures are placed at the margins of the repaired fistula.

The graft is obtained through a vertical incision over the labium majus. It is separated from the underlying vestibular bulb and bulbocavernosus muscle and then tunneled beneath the labium minora and through the paracolpium to finally reach and overlay the 2-layer bladder closure. It is secured at its distal end with 4-corner stay sutures. The vaginal wall is closed using interrupted chromic or Vicryl sutures, and then the labial incision is closed. A Penrose drain is placed at the bed of the graft and brought out at a lateral site if any persistent bleeding is noted. This drain is then removed on the third to fifth postoperative day.

Full-thickness fasciocutaneous Martius flaps

VVFs treated with multiple surgeries, pelvic radiotherapy-associated VVF, and large obstetric fistulas often are complicated with marked tissue devascularization, necrosis, and cicatrization. In order to successfully repair such VVFs, surgeons are faced with greater difficulties in attempting to comply with surgical principles of adequate blood supply to the operative bed, low-tension closure, and closure of dead space. Vaginal vault caliber and pliability also must be preserved for optimal success.

Whereas most small (< 4 cm) VVFs can be repaired with a flap-splitting technique, large (>4 cm) VVFs are complicated by increased rates of vaginal stenosis and atresia when repaired in this manner. In Elkins, Delaney, and McGuire's publication in 1990, the authors point out that reapproximating the vaginal margins over the graft is not always necessary because the graft has the capability of supporting the growth of granulation tissue, thereby promoting healing by secondary intention. However, in cases where the vaginal incisions were left open, significant morbidity was noted; increased rates of infection, marked vaginal scarring, and vaginal stricture were encountered.

Full-thickness Martius grafts to preserve vaginal depth may be considered as an adjunct to transvaginal flap-splitting surgery for the repair of large vaginal fistulas and will obviate the risks associated with nonclosure of vaginal incisions as described by Elkins. Symmonds found Martius-type pedicles with an intact island of skin from the medial non–hair-bearing portion of the labium to work well with both VVF and rectovaginal fistula repairs. This skin is secured at the vaginal defect site in the vagina, ensuring a low-tension closure at the bed of the vaginal fistula site.

Margolis and Elkins et al developed a modified Martius graft procedure whereby an island of non–hair-bearing skin from the area just distal to the inguinal ligament is preserved with the underlying cutaneous tissue and bulbocavernosus graft.[49]

Gracilis muscle flap

The predominant application for the gracilis muscle flap is in total vaginal reconstruction following pelvic exenteration.

The gracilis muscle reaches to cover the medial portion of the groin, the vulva, the perineum, and the lower abdomen. Its major blood supply is a branch of the profunda femoris entering the upper one third of the muscle. This dominant vascular pedicle is the point of rotation for the flap and supports the entire muscle and overlying skin island.

Peritoneal flap

Raz describes an 82% success rate in his series of 11 patients with VVF repaired with the flap-splitting technique combined with an adjunctive peritoneal flap procedure.[65] All patients selected for the procedure possessed fistulas high in the vaginal vault adjacent to the posthysterectomy cuff, 10 had failed prior repair(s), and none had a history of pelvic radiotherapy. Crucial to the technique is proper development of the anterior vaginal wall flap beyond the posterior wall of the bladder. The authors state the risk of bladder injury is minimized if the dissection is performed "just below the vaginal wall and the perivesical fascia is not violated."

The surgical technique for a peritoneal flap involves the following. With the patient in the dorsal lithotomy position, the fistula tract is gently dilated to 12F, and an 8F Foley is inserted through the fistula. Inflating the balloon enables traction on the catheter and facilitates exposure. Cystoscopy and placement of ureteral stents are performed if the fistula encroaches on the ureteric orifices. A suprapubic catheter is placed.

The anterior vaginal wall is incised in an inverted J fashion, with the long end extending toward the vaginal apex. The incision curves under the fistula, which then is circumscribed. The anterior and posterior flaps are mobilized widely to a distance of 2-4 cm from the fistula. The rim of vaginal wall encircling the fistula tract is left intact. A row of 4-0 polyglycolic acid sutures is placed in the raw fascia and incorporates a partial thickness of the bladder wall. The sutures are tied after removal of the catheter from the tract. A second layer of 2-0 polyglycolic sutures is placed into the fascia and the bladder wall, applied at least 1 cm from the first row in order to fully imbricate the first layer.

Attention now is turned to developing the peritoneal flap. Dissection between the vaginal wall and bladder is continued cephalad at the posterior flap. Continuing dissection just beyond the posterior wall of the bladder exposes the peritoneum at the anterior cul-de-sac. It is not transected. Instead, it is mobilized carefully from the posterior bladder wall and brought down to reach beyond the fistula site and be secured over the fistula repair suture line with 2-0 polyglycolic sutures. Closure integrity is assessed with indigo carmine. Trimming of the anterior vaginal flap is performed. The posterior vaginal flap is brought distally over and beyond the site of the peritoneum suture line and reapproximated with the anterior vaginal wall with 2-0 polyglycolic sutures in a running technique. Vaginal packing is used. The transurethral catheter is removed on postoperative day 14, and the suprapubic catheter is removed when a cystogram shows no evidence of failure of repair.

Lentz reported his series of 6 patients with VVF repaired transvaginally with complete resection of the fistula tract, performance of layered closure, and placement of a peritoneal flap between the bladder and vaginal suture lines. Primary repair was successful and had no complications in all cases. To ensure adequate reperitonealization of the pelvis after the index surgery so that a peritoneal flap could be adequately secured, he suggests a surgical delay of 2-3 months after diagnosis.[66]

Abdominal approach interposition grafts or flaps include the following:

  • Omental J flap
  • Peritoneal flap
  • Rectus abdominis muscle flap
  • Autologous bladder mucosa interposition graft
  • Free supporting graft
  • Human dura mater interposition graft
  • Broad ligament flaps

Omental J flap

Omentum, with its rich lymphatic and vascular supply, is ideal as an interposition graft. In approximately one third of patients, the omentum has sufficient length to extend to the pelvis without tension. The remaining patients require mobilization from the right or left gastroepiploic artery to form a pedicle of sufficient length. The right is preferred because it has a better blood supply.

The omentum may be mobilized off the transverse colon, and ligation and division of the short gastric branches may be required. The omentum can be mobilized on the right gastroepiploic artery from the transverse colon. Absorbable sutures must be used at the distal omentum in order to avoid contact of permanent suture at the bladder.

A number of surgeons have performed VVF repair with an omental J flap under laparoscopic technique and have found it to be a good alternative to the traditional abdominal approach.

Peritoneal flap

As with transvaginal approach, peritoneal flaps may be used during a transabdominal approach to provide an additional layer between the bladder and vaginal cuff at the time of repair of a VVF.

In an effort to decrease the likelihood of VVF formation, it has been suggested as a technique to be used at the time of repair of both incidental and intentional cystotomies that occur during simple and complicated pelvic surgeries.

Rectus abdominis muscle flap

Kanavel first described using a flap isolated from the rectus abdominis muscle for repair of a space of Retzius defect in 1921.[67]

In 1965, Banerji published his experience with rectus abdominis musculofascial pedicle grafts in the treatment of 7 patients with VVFs. All of the fistulas resulted from obstetric trauma. Of 7 patients, 4 were cured.[68]

Menchaca and his colleagues improved Kanavel's success with modification of the procedure. By securing the free end of the pedicle flap to periurethral fascia, a 100% success rate was observed in their series of 3 patients. All of the VVFs were large posthysterectomy fistulas for which prior unsuccessful repairs had been attempted; 2 had prior radiotherapy.[69]

Autologous bladder mucosa interposition graft

Brandt and colleagues enrolled 80 patients with VVFs into their prospective multicenter study. All VVFs were secondary to gynecologic surgery; 90% of the fistulas were supratrigonal, and 10% were infratrigonal. The repairs were performed within 1-3 months of index surgery or were prior failed VVF repairs. The technique demonstrated a 96.3% success rate. A healthy well-vascularized bed free of any fibrotic tissue was considered essential for the success of the procedure. Advantages associated with this technique were nonentry into the peritoneal cavity, small cystotomy needed for access, and ease of obtaining an interposition graft.[70]

The technique consists of the following. The procedure begins with a transvesical approach. An incision in the anterior bladder wall is performed above the fistula site. The fistula tract is resected sharply, with care to remove all fibrosis at the bladder, fascial, and vaginal levels and includes a 3- to 5-mm area free of scarring. The vaginal defect is closed with 3-0 chromic sutures. The bladder is mobilized off the underlying tissue. A site is selected at the bladder dome for harvesting of the donor mucosal graft. The graft is dissected from the muscularis and interposed between the bladder and vaginal walls so that the mucosal surface faces the vagina. The bladder wall is then closed over the graft using 5-0 continuous catgut. The anterior cystotomy is closed in 2 layers with 3-0 interrupted chromic sutures.

Vyas and colleagues report of a 91% success rate using mucosal autografts for repair of VVF. A transabdominal approach was used for fistulae above the trigone and a combined abdominal and vaginal approach for fistulae involving the trigone. The fistula was circumscribed with sharp dissection and scar tissue from prior surgeries was removed; however, they made no attempt to separate the vesical and vaginal layers. The vaginal layer of the fistula was closed with interrupted 4-0 polyglactin sutures. The graft was secured to the margins of the fistula with 3 or 4 interrupted sutures.[71]

Free supporting graft

Moharram and El-Raouf report their 100% success rate in the repair of urogenital fistulas in 26 women using a retropubic transvesical approach with placement of a support graft from the anterior abdominal wall fat. After a wide dissection between the bladder and the vagina and the fistula tract was completely excised, the vagina was closed in 2 layers using 0 polyglactin in a transverse line. The first layer was continuous; the second layer was in interrupted fashion. The free graft of abdominal wall fat was placed over the first suture line and sealed under the second set of sutures. The bladder was closed in 2 layers. The first layer was continuous and the second was in interrupted fashion. Also used were ureteric, suprapubic, and urethral catheters.[72]

Human dura mater interposition graft

In a prospective study of 11 patients with VVF, Alagol and colleagues used solvent dehydrated, gamma-radiated human dura mater. They reported a 100% success rate. Surgical technique included a transvesical extraperitoneal approach. The fistula was circumscribed to removed scarred edges at the fistula; the tract was left intact. The bladder was widely dissected from the vagina. Interrupted sutures of 3-0 polyglactin were placed in the vaginal layer followed by placement of a 2 x 2 cm dura mater graft and secured with 3 interrupted sutures.

The bladder mucosa at the fistula was closed in interrupted fashion with same suture material. The cystotomy was closed in 2 layers, first with continuous 3-0 polyglactin and then with 1-0 interrupted polyglactin sutures in the muscularis. A urethral catheter was left in place for 5 days; the suprapubic catheter was kept in place for 14 days. The fistula size ranged from 5-21 mm (average 9 mm). According to the authors, the beneficial qualities of human dura mater include its excellent tissue compatibility, stability, good elasticity, and absorbability.[73]

Broad ligament flaps

Singh, Pavithran, and Nanda describe their plastic reconstruction technique for the repair of mega vesicovaginal fistulae resulting from obstetric complications. This type of flap would not be necessary in the discussion of those fistula typically encountered in developed countries.[74]

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Bladder drainage: The consensus is overwhelming in the literature that continuous bladder drainage postoperatively is vital for successful UGF repair. A large-caliber catheter minimizes the potential for catheter blockage by blood clots, mucus, and calcaneus deposits. However, to date, no prospective randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of any single type of catheter drainage.

Type and duration of catheter drainage: For fistulas involving the lower portion of the bladder trigone, bladder neck, or urethra, transurethral bladder catheters should not be used. Symmonds finds a large suprapubic catheter for 7-60 days preferable to minimize excess tension on the suture line and to ensure nonobstructed continuous drainage.[75] In posthysterectomy VVF repairs, both transurethral and suprapubic catheters may be placed. The urethral catheter may be discontinued on the fifth to seventh day. If vesical integrity is noted 2 weeks later on a cystogram, the suprapubic catheter may be removed. Surgeries to repair pelvic radiotherapy-associated VVFs require longer periods of drainage.

Acidification of urine to diminish risks of cystitis, mucus production, and formation of bladder calculi is a consideration for patients with an indwelling catheter. Vitamin C at 500 mg orally 3 times per day may be used to acidify urine. Alternatively, methenamine mandelate at 550 mg plus sodium acid phosphate at 500 mg 1-4 times daily also can be administered to achieve urine acidification.

Estrogen replacement therapy in the postmenopausal patient may assist with optimizing tissue vascularization and healing (see Medical therapy).

Control of postoperative bladder spasms: Urised is effective for control of postoperative bladder spasms. It is a combination of antiseptics (methenamine, methylene blue, phenyl salicylate, and benzoic acid) and parasympatholytics (atropine sulfate, and hyoscyamine sulfate).

Antibiotic therapy: The use of antibiotic therapy postoperatively is controversial. Many physicians administer oral antibiotic prophylaxis to patients with VVF postoperatively until the Foley catheter is discontinued. Others check closely for the development of a urinary tract infection and administer antibiotic therapy when urine cultures are positive for bacterial growth. Close follow-up and prompt evaluation for any urinary tract infections and antibiotic therapy, when indicated, are mandatory.

Minimizing Valsalva maneuvers: Stool softeners and a high-fiber diet postoperatively minimize Valsalva maneuvers in the patient.

Examinations: Avoid pelvic and speculum vaginal examinations during the first 4-6 weeks postoperatively because the tissue is delicate.

Pelvic rest: Prohibit coitus and tampon use for a minimum of 4-6 weeks. Other authors advocate strict pelvic rest for 3 months.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

See Postoperative details.

Previous
Next

Complications

Integral to all major surgeries are risks of infection; hemorrhage; injury to other organs, particularly the ureters; surgical failure of fistula repair; possible new fistula formation; thromboembolism; and death. Preoperatively, patients should be informed of the possibilities of sexual dysfunction or dissatisfaction, new-onset incontinence, and the progression of preexisting urge and/or stress incontinence symptoms. Authors also mentioned recommendations for cesarean delivery for subsequent pregnancies.

Abdominal approach procedures carry additional risks of abdominal and pelvic adhesions. Vaginal approach procedures carry increased risks of dyspareunia, tenderness at the site of the donor Martius graft, and diminished vaginal length and caliber.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

See Techniques of repair.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

John Spurlock, MD Medical Director and Founder, Continence Management Institute of the Lehigh Valley

John Spurlock, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, American Urogynecologic Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Christine Isaacs, MD Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division Head, General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Director of Midwifery Services, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine

Christine Isaacs, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Christine Isaacs, MD Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division Head, General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Director of Midwifery Services, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine

Christine Isaacs, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Jeffrey B Garris, MD Chief, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine

Jeffrey B Garris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Medical Association, American Urological Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Louisiana State Medical Society, Royal Society of Medicine, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Valerie J Riley, MD Director, Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lehigh Valley Hospital and Health Network

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Jobert de Lamballe AJ. Balliere, Fils, eds. Traite Des Fistules Vesico-Uterines. Paris, France: 1852.

  2. Sims JM. On the treatment of vesico-vaginal fistula. 1852. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998. 9(4):236-48. [Medline].

  3. Collis M. Further remarks on a new successful mode of treatment for vesicovaginal fistula. Dublin Q J. 1861. 31:302-16.

  4. Schuchardt K. Eine neue Methode der Gebarmutterextirpation. Zentralbl Chir. 1893. 20:1121.

  5. Trendelenburg F. Discussion zu Helferich. Zuganglichmachung der vorderen Blasenwand. Verbandlung der Deutsche ges F Chir. 1888. 17:101.

  6. Maisonneuve J. Clinique Chirurgicale. Paris, France: 1863. 660.

  7. Mackenrodt A. Die operative Heilung grosser Blasenscheidenfisteln. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1894. 8:180.

  8. Latzko W. Postoperative vesicovaginal fistulas: genesis and therapy. Am J Surg. 1942. 58:211-8.

  9. Garlock J. The cure of an intractable vesicovaginal fistula by the use of pedicled muscle graft. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1928. 47:255.

  10. Martius H. Die operative Wiederher-stellung der Volkmmen fehlenden Harnrohre und des Schliessmuskels derselben. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1928. 8:480.

  11. Ingelman-Sundberg AGI. Pathogenesis and operative treatment of urinary fistula in irradiated tissue. Youssef A, Thomas CC, eds. Gynecological Urology. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas Publishers; 1960. 263.

  12. Kiricuta I, Goldstein AM. The repair of extensive vesicovaginal fistulas with pedicled omentum: a review of 27 cases. J Urol. 1972 Nov. 108(5):724-7. [Medline].

  13. Capes T, Ascher-Walsh C, Abdoulaye I, Brodman M. Obstetric fistula in low and middle income countries. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 May-Jun. 78(3):352-61. [Medline].

  14. Tebeu PM, Fomulu JN, Khaddaj S, de Bernis L, Delvaux T, Rochat CH. Risk factors for obstetric fistula: a clinical review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Dec 6. [Medline].

  15. Tancer ML. Observations on prevention and management of vesicovaginal fistula after total hysterectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Dec. 175(6):501-6. [Medline].

  16. Andreoni C, Bruschini H, Truzzi JC, Simonetti R, Srougi M. Combined vaginoscopy-cystoscopy: a novel simultaneous approach improving vesicovaginal fistula evaluation. J Urol. 2003 Dec. 170(6 Pt 1):2330-2. [Medline].

  17. Volkmer BG, Kuefer R, Nesslauer T, Loeffler M, Gottfried HW. Colour Doppler ultrasound in vesicovaginal fistulas. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000 Jun. 26(5):771-5. [Medline].

  18. Zimmern PE, Hadley HR, Staskin D. Genitourinary fistulas: vaginal approach for repair of vesicovaginal fistulas. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Jun. 12(2):403-13. [Medline].

  19. Davits RJ, Miranda SI. Conservative treatment of vesicovaginal fistulas by bladder drainage alone. Br J Urol. 1991 Aug. 68(2):155-6. [Medline].

  20. Elkins T, Thompson J. Lower urinary tract fistulas. Walters M, Karram M, eds. Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1999. 355-66.

  21. Angioli R, Penalver M, Muzii L, Mendez L, Mirhashemi R, Bellati F. Guidelines of how to manage vesicovaginal fistula. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003 Dec. 48(3):295-304. [Medline].

  22. Margolis T, Mercer LJ. Vesicovaginal fistula. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994 Dec. 49(12):840-7. [Medline].

  23. O'Conor VJ Jr. Review of experience with vesicovaginal fistula repair. J Urol. 1980 Mar. 123(3):367-9. [Medline].

  24. Carr LK, Webster GD. Abdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistula. Urology. 1996 Jul. 48(1):10-1. [Medline].

  25. Persky L, Herman G, Guerrier K. Nondelay in vesicovaginal fistula repair. Urology. 1979 Mar. 13(3):273-5. [Medline].

  26. Blandy JP, Badenoch DF, Fowler CG. Early repair of iatrogenic injury to the ureter or bladder after gynecological surgery. J Urol. 1991 Sep. 146(3):761-5. [Medline].

  27. Blaivas JG, Heritz DM, Romanzi LJ. Early versus late repair of vesicovaginal fistulas: vaginal and abdominal approaches. J Urol. 1995 Apr. 153(4):1110-2; discussion 1112-3. [Medline].

  28. Lee RA, Symmonds RE, Williams TJ. Current status of genitourinary fistula. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Sep. 72(3 Pt 1):313-9. [Medline].

  29. Tomlinson AJ, Thornton JG. A randomised controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis for vesico- vaginal fistula repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Apr. 105(4):397-9. [Medline].

  30. Elkins TE. Surgery for the obstetric vesicovaginal fistula: a review of 100 operations in 82 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr. 170(4):1108-18; discussion 1118-20. [Medline].

  31. Raz S. Female Urology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1893. 373-7.

  32. Cruikshank SH. Early closure of posthysterectomy vesicovaginal fistulas. South Med J. 1988 Dec. 81(12):1525-8. [Medline].

  33. Iselin CE, Aslan P, Webster GD. Transvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistulas after hysterectomy by vaginal cuff excision. J Urol. 1998 Sep. 160(3 Pt 1):728-30. [Medline].

  34. Aycinena JF. Small vesicovaginal fistula. Urology. 1977 May. 9(5):543-5. [Medline].

  35. Abdel-Karim AM, Moussa A, Elsalmy S. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery extravesical repair of vesicovaginal fistula: early experience. Urology. 2011 Sep. 78(3):567-71. [Medline].

  36. Yarmohamadi A, Asl Zare M, Ahmadnia H, Mogharabian N. Salvage repair of vesicovaginal fistula. Urol J. 2011 Summer. 8(3):209-13. [Medline].

  37. Elkins TE, DeLancey JO, McGuire EJ. The use of modified Martius graft as an adjunctive technique in vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistula repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr. 75(4):727-33. [Medline].

  38. Flynn MK, Peterson AC, Amundsen CL, Webster GD. Functional outcomes of primary and secondary repairs of vesicovaginal fistulae via vaginal cuff scar excision. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Nov-Dec. 15(6):394-8; discussion 398. [Medline].

  39. Weinlechner. Demonstration einer nach der Methode Trendelenburg's ausgefurten Operation einer Vesico-vaginalfistel. Wien Klin Webnschr. 1893. 125.

  40. Bardenheuer B. Der Extraperitoneale Explorativschnitt. Stuttgart. 1887.

  41. Turner-Warwick R. The use of the omental pedicle graft in urinary tract reconstruction-. J Urol. 1976 Sep. 116(3):341-7. [Medline].

  42. Dittel V. Abdominale Blasenscheidfistel-Operation. Wien Klin Webnschr. 1803. 6:449-52.

  43. Legueu F. De la voie transperitoneo-vesicale pour la cure certaines fistules vesico-vaginales operatoires. Arch Urol Clin De Necker. 1913. 1:1-11.

  44. O'Conor V, Sokol J. Vesicovaginal fistula from the standpoint of the urologist. J Urol. 1951. 66:579.

  45. Gil-Vernet JM, Gil-Vernet A, Campos JA. New surgical approach for treatment of complex vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol. 1989 Mar. 141(3):513-6. [Medline].

  46. Coleman JW, Albanese C, Marion D. Experimental use of free grafts of bladder mucosa in canine bladders. Successful closure of recurrent vesicovaginal fistula utilizing bladder mucosa. Urology. 1985 May. 25(5):515-7. [Medline].

  47. Ostad M, Uzzo RG, Coleman J. Use of a free bladder mucosal graft for simple repair of vesicovaginal fistulae. Urology. 1998 Jul. 52(1):123-6. [Medline].

  48. Stovsky MD, Ignatoff JM, Blum MD. Use of electrocoagulation in the treatment of vesicovaginal fistulas. J Urol. 1994 Nov. 152(5 Pt 1):1443-4. [Medline].

  49. Margolis T, Elkins TE, Seffah J. Full-thickness Martius grafts to preserve vaginal depth as an adjunct in the repair of large obstetric fistulas. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul. 84(1):148-52. [Medline].

  50. Matras H, Dinges HP, Lassmann H. [Suture-free interfascicular nerve transplantation in animal experiments]. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1972 Sep 9. 122(37):517-23. [Medline].

  51. Matras H. Fibrin seal: the state of the art. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Aug. 43(8):605-11. [Medline].

  52. Pettersson S, Hedelin H, Jansson I. Fibrin occlusion of a vesicovaginal fistula. Lancet. 1979 Apr 28. 1(8122):933. [Medline].

  53. Hedelin H, Nilson AE, Teger-Nilsson AC. Fibrin occlusion of fistulas postoperatively. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Mar. 154(3):366-8. [Medline].

  54. Venkatesh KS, Ramanujam P. Fibrin glue application in the treatment of recurrent anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Sep. 42(9):1136-9. [Medline].

  55. Tsurusaki T, Sakai H, Nishikido M. Occlusion therapy for an intractable transplant-ureteral fistula using fibrin glue. J Urol. 1996 May. 155(5):1698. [Medline].

  56. Sharma SK, Perry KT, Turk TM. Endoscopic injection of fibrin glue for the treatment of urinary-tract pathology. J Endourol. 2005 Apr. 19(3):419-23. [Medline].

  57. Morita T, Tokue A. Successful endoscopic closure of radiation induced vesicovaginal fistula with fibrin glue and bovine collagen. J Urol. 1999 Nov. 162(5):1689. [Medline].

  58. Dogra PN, Nabi G. Laser welding of vesicovaginal fistula. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001. 12(1):69-70. [Medline].

  59. Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat F. Laparoscopic management of intentional and unintentional cystotomy. J Urol. 1996 Oct. 156(4):1400-2. [Medline].

  60. Sotelo R, Mariano MB, García-Segui A, Dubois R, Spaliviero M, Keklikian W. Laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol. 2005 May. 173(5):1615-8. [Medline].

  61. Melamud O, Eichel L, Turbow B, Shanberg A. Laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair with robotic reconstruction. Urology. 2005 Jan. 65(1):163-6. [Medline].

  62. Javali TD, Katti A, Nagaraj HK. A simplified laparoscopic approach to repair vesicovaginal fistula: the M.S. Ramaiah technique. Urology. 2015 Mar. 85 (3):544-6. [Medline].

  63. Agrawal V, Kucherov V, Bendana E, Joseph J, Rashid H, Wu G. Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Single-center Experience. Urology. 2015 Aug. 86 (2):276-81. [Medline].

  64. McKay HA. Transurethral suture cystorrhaphy for repair of vesicovaginal fistulas: evolution of a technique. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001. 12(4):282-7.

  65. Raz S, Bregg KJ, Nitti VW. Transvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistula using a peritoneal flap. J Urol. 1993 Jul. 150(1):56-9. [Medline].

  66. Lentz SS. Transvaginal repair of the posthysterectomy vesicovaginal fistula using a peritoneal flap: the gold standard. J Reprod Med. 2005 Jan. 50(1):41-4. [Medline].

  67. Kanavel A. Plastic procedures for the obliteration of cavities with noncollapsible walls. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921. 32:453.

  68. Banerji B. Role of musculofascial pedicle graft in operative repair of vesicovaginal fistulae. Int Surg. 1966 Apr. 45(4):391-6. [Medline].

  69. Menchaca A, Akhyat M, Gleicher N. The rectus abdominis muscle flap in a combined abdominovaginal repair of difficult vesicovaginal fistulae. A report of three cases. J Reprod Med. 1990 May. 35(5):565-8. [Medline].

  70. Brandt FT, Lorenzato FR, Albuquerque CD. Treatment of vesicovaginal fistula by bladder mucosa autograft technique. J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Jun. 186(6):645-8. [Medline].

  71. Vyas N, Nandi PR, Mahmood M, Tandon V, Dwivedi US, Singh PB. Bladder mucosal autografts for repair of vesicovaginal fistula. BJOG. 2005 Jan. 112(1):112-4. [Medline].

  72. el-Lateef Moharram AA, el-Raouf MA. Retropubic repair of genitourinary fistula using a free supporting graft. BJU Int. 2004 Mar. 93(4):581-3. [Medline].

  73. Alagöl B, Gözen AS, Kaya E, Inci O. The use of human dura mater as an interposition graft in the treatment of vesicovaginal fistula. Int Urol Nephrol. 2004. 36(1):35-40. [Medline].

  74. Singh RB, Pavithran NM, Nanda S. Plastic reconstruction of a mega vesicovaginal fistula using broad ligament flaps--a new technique. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Feb. 14(1):62-3.

  75. Symmonds RE. Incontinence: vesical and urethral fistulas. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jun. 27(2):499-514. [Medline].

  76. Abel ME, Chiu YS, Russell TR. Autologous fibrin glue in the treatment of rectovaginal and complex fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 May. 36(5):447-9. [Medline].

  77. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Genitourinary Fistulas. ACOG Technical Bulletin. 83:1-6.

  78. Cronkite E, Lozner E, Deaver J. Use of thrombin and fibrinogen in skin grafting. JAMA. 1994. 124:976-8.

  79. Elkins TE, Drescher C, Martey JO. Vesicovaginal fistula revisited. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Sep. 72(3 Pt 1):307-12. [Medline].

  80. Evans LA, Ferguson KH, Foley JP, Rozanski TA, Morey AF. Fibrin sealant for the management of genitourinary injuries, fistulas and surgical complications. J Urol. 2003 Apr. 169(4):1360-2. [Medline].

  81. Falk H, Tancer M. Vesicovaginal fistula: an historical survey. Obstet Gynecol. 1954. 3:337-41.

  82. Fitzpatrick C, Elkins T. Plastic surgical techniques in the repair of vesicovaginal fistulas: a review. Int Urogynecol J. 1993. 4:287-95.

  83. Goodwin WE, Scardino PT. Vesicovaginal and ureterovaginal fistulas: a summary of 25 years of experience. J Urol. 1980 Mar. 123(3):370-4. [Medline].

  84. Hanash KA, Al Zahrani H, Mokhtar AA. Retrograde vaginal methylene blue injection for localization of complex urinary fistulas. J Endourol. 2003 Dec. 17(10):941-3.

  85. Huang WC, Zinman LN, Bihrle W 3rd. Surgical repair of vesicovaginal fistulas. Urol Clin North Am. 2002 Aug. 29(3):709-23. [Medline].

  86. Langkilde NC, Pless TK, Lundbeck F. Surgical repair of vesicovaginal fistulae--a ten-year retrospective study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1999 Apr. 33(2):100-3. [Medline].

  87. Latzko W. Behandlung hochsitzender Blasen und Mastdarmscheiden Fistein nach Uterus Extirpation mit hohem Scheidenverschluss. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1914. 38:906.

  88. Miller EA, Webster GD. Current management of vesicovaginal fistulae. Curr Opin Urol. 2001 Jul. 11(4):417-21. [Medline].

  89. Nahai F. Muscle and musculocutaneous flaps in gynecologic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Dec. 24(4):1277-317. [Medline].

  90. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula: a case report. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May. 83(5 Pt 2):899-901. [Medline].

  91. Ninkovic M, Dabernig W. Flap technology for reconstructions of urogenital organs. Curr Opin Urol. 2003 Nov. 13(6):483-8. [Medline].

  92. O'Conor VJ Jr, Sokol JK, Bulkley GJ, Nanninga JB. Suprapubic closure of vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol. 1973 Jan. 109(1):51-4. [Medline].

  93. Pettit PD, Petrou SP. The value of cystoscopy in major vaginal surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug. 84(2):318-20. [Medline].

  94. Phadke K, Ballal S, Venkatesh K. Pediatric renal transplantation--Indian experience. Indian Pediatr. 1998 Mar. 35(3):231-5. [Medline].

  95. Phillips J. Laparoscopic repair of posthysterectomy vesicovaginal fistula: two case reports. Gynaecol Endos. 1996. 5:123-4.

  96. Punekar SV, Buch DN, Soni AB, Swami G, Rao SR, Kinne JS, et al. Martius' labial fat pad interposition and its modification in complex lower urinary fistulae. J Postgrad Med. 1999 Jul-Sep. 45(3):69-73. [Medline].

  97. Rizvi JH. Genital fistulae. A continuing tragedy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1999 Feb. 25(1):1-7. [Medline].

  98. Robertson J. Vesicovaginal fistula: vaginal repair. Ostergard D, Bent A, eds. Urogynecology and Urodynamics: Theory and Principle. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996. 371-4.

  99. Sharifi-Aghdas F, Ghaderian N, Payvand A. Free bladder mucosal autograft in the treatment of complicated vesicovaginal fistula. BJU Int. 2002 Mar. 89 Suppl 1:54-6. [Medline].

  100. Smith GL, Williams G. Vesicovaginal fistula. BJU Int. 1999 Mar. 83(5):564-9; quiz 569-70. [Medline].

  101. Tancer ML. A report of thirty-four instances of urethrovaginal and bladder neck fistulas. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Jul. 177(1):77-80. [Medline].

  102. von Theobald P, Hamel P, Febbraro W. Laparoscopic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula using an omental J flap. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Nov. 105(11):1216-8. [Medline].

  103. Wall LL, Arrowsmith SD, Briggs ND. The obstetric vesicovaginal fistula in the developing world. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005 Jul. 60(7 Suppl 1):S3-S51.

  104. Warwick RT, Worth P, Milroy E. The suprapubic V-incision. Br J Urol. 1974 Feb. 46(1):39-45. [Medline].

  105. Wiskind A, Thompson J. Should cystoscopy be performed at every gynecologic operation to diagnose unsuspected ureteral injury?. J Pelvic Surg. 1995. 1:134.

  106. Zacharin R. Obstetric Fistula. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1988.

  107. Gedik A, Deliktas H, Celik N, Kayan D, Bircan MK. Which Surgical Technique Should be Preferred to Repair Benign, Primary Vesicovaginal Fistulas?. Urol J. 2015 Dec 23. 12 (6):2422-7. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.