eMedicine Specialties > Obstetrics and Gynecology > Gynecologic Surgery

Pelvic Exenteration: Treatment

Author: Margrit M Juretzka, MD, MS, Assistant Professor of Gynecologic Oncology, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics
Coauthor(s): Nelson Teng, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine; Amreen Husain, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Dec 22, 2008

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Chemotherapy in patients with recurrent cervical cancer is an option for patients with distant metastatic disease and for those who are not candidates for pelvic exenteration. Several regimens have been evaluated, and response rates of 5-40% are described. A Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) phase III study of cisplatin versus cisplatin and topotecan in patients with advanced (stage IVB), recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer reported a survival advantage in the combination arm (9.4 vs 6.5 mo).17 However, most responses to chemotherapy are at best partial and of short duration; therefore, chemotherapy is generally a poor alternative to surgery in patients with recurrent disease who are candidates for a surgical approach.11

Preoperative Details

Preparation

An antibiotic and a mechanical bowel preparation are administered on the day prior to surgery. The stoma sites are marked on the skin before surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics are administered in the operating room, and pneumatic calf compression units are placed on the legs prior to the anesthetic induction. The potential operative field, including the entire abdomen, perineum, vagina, rectum, and thighs are prepped and draped.  

Position

The procedure is typically performed with the patient in the lithotomy position. The patient's legs are carefully placed in Allen or other supported stirrups. The correct positioning places the weight on the feet and includes padding to ensure protection from neurologic injury and to prevent compartment syndrome.

Vascular access

Adequate vascular access must be available in order to ensure that rapid fluid and blood product resuscitation can be instituted if needed. Vascular access also allows invasive cardiovascular monitoring as indicated.

Intraoperative Details

Exploration

The patient is placed in the low lithotomy position, and, through a midline incision, the abdomen and pelvis are thoroughly explored. The liver, peritoneal and bowel surfaces, aortic and pelvic nodal groups, and pelvic sidewall are carefully evaluated. Biopsies of any suspicious sites are obtained and examined by frozen section. Distant and peritoneal metastases are absolute contraindications to exenteration.5

Controversy exists regarding whether to proceed in the presence of nodal metastasis, which reduces the survival rate to 5%, or direct tumor invasion of any adherent loop of sigmoid colon or small bowel. The issue of sidewall involvement is important in determining resectability because the goal is to achieve negative surgical margins. In some centers, the availability of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) allows resection with close margins19 , but grossly positive margins confer an extremely poor prognosis. The process of dissecting open avascular spaces allows for further determination of resectability with adequate margins.

The pararectal, paravesical, and Retzius spaces are developed under direct visualization, and the cardinal ligaments are isolated by this method. The pelvic retroperitoneal spaces are opened, and the ureters and internal and external iliac vessels are identified and tagged as necessary. This allows identification of pelvic nodal metastasis, dissection of the ureter, and visualization of vessels, which may require ligation to control or prevent excessive bleeding.

Exenteration
  • Total pelvic exenteration: After the hypogastric artery is identified and its anterior division or the uterine artery is divided, the cardinal ligaments are divided at the pelvic sidewall. This can be accomplished using endoscopic stapling devices. The ureters are dissected free of the lateral peritoneum and are clipped and divided, leaving as much length as feasible. The retrorectal space between the sigmoid and the sacrum and coccyx is developed. The sigmoid arcade and the superior rectal vessels are ligated. The sigmoid is then divided using a gastrointestinal assistant (GIA) stapler.
  • Supralevator exenteration: The rectum is lifted off the sacral hollow posteriorly using blunt and sharp dissection. The lateral attachments are freed using the endoscopic GIA. Anteriorly, the bladder is completely freed from the public symphysis, and the vesicourethral junction is identified. (The resection is thus carried en bloc to the level of the levator ani.) If a supralevator exenteration is adequate, the urethra is divided anteriorly; the rectum, posteriorly at the level of the pelvic floor; and the vagina, below the level of the tumor with adequate margins.
  • Infralevator exenteration: For the perineal phase, a second team of surgeons is usually involved. A total vaginectomy and urethrectomy is accomplished by making a circumferential incision inside the vulva; if necessary, resection of the anus is also incorporated. The vagina is dissected off the levator muscles unless they have tumor involvement. If this is the case, the muscle is excised to obtain an adequate margin. The rectovaginal space is developed from above and below, and lateral rectal pillars are divided. The rectum is divided using the GIA stapler at the level of the mid vagina (if a complete perineal resection is not being performed), and the specimen is thus freed completely and removed.

Reconstruction

  • Rectal anastomosis: The decision to perform an end-sigmoid colostomy or a low rectal anastomosis is based on the level of the resection, the length of the rectal stump, and the extent of other concomitant procedures. A low rectal anastomosis can sometimes be accomplished using the circular end-to-end anastomotic stapling device.3,4 Reports have evaluated the complications associated with a rectal anastomosis at the time of pelvic exenteration, and the overall incidence of anastomotic leaks or fistula formation is 30-50%. A protective colostomy or omental wrap has not been found to have a significant impact on the incidence of successful healing. Recent data suggest that a higher leak rate occurs in patients undergoing concomitant procedures such as IORT and continent urinary diversions.
  • Urinary diversion:
    • Several options exist for urinary diversion, and the choice of continent versus noncontinent urinary diversion is based on assessment of the patient's ability to care for a continent pouch and availability of right colon and ileum with the ileocecal valve.4 The best option for noncontinent diversion is an ileal urinary conduit in which the ureters are implanted in an isoperistaltic manner into a segment of small bowel, one end of which is brought out as a cutaneous stoma.
    • The continent pouch uses the right colon as a low-pressure reservoir, with the ileum, ileocecal valve, or appendix specially configured to create the continence mechanism. A variety of continent pouches with small variations have been described.9 Complications associated with both continent and noncontinent urinary diversions in women who are gynecologic oncology patients have been reported by several authors. A continent urinary diversion allows the patient to have only a single ostomy bag, or none at all, and it can be successfully accomplished in patients with gynecologic cancer. Early complication rates range from 12-53%, and long-term complication rates from 33-37%. The reoperation rate is 6-8%.
  • Vaginal reconstruction: Several methods for vaginal and pelvic reconstruction have been described. An omental flap can be accomplished, generally with minimal morbidity, and serves to carpet the raw exposed surfaces of the exenterated pelvis. Myocutaneous grafts, including rectus and gracilis muscle flaps, can be brought into the pelvis and perineum to create pelvic support and a neovagina. Split-thickness skin grafts have also been used to create neovaginas.

Follow-up

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Cancer and Tumors Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Cervical Cancer.

Complications

The potential complications after pelvic exenteration are numerous. Almost every patient develops at least 1 complication, and approximately 40-50% experience a major complication requiring further diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.16,6 . The operative mortality rate is 2-5% in modern series. The major early postoperative complications include blood loss, sepsis, wound dehiscence, and anastomotic breakdown at the level of the bowel, urinary pouch, or ureteral sites. The rate of late complications is lower, but approximately one third of patients experience fistula, bowel obstruction, ureteral strictures, renal failure, pyelonephritis, and chronic bowel obstructions. Other complications include deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli, flap necrosis, and stomal necrosis.

More on Pelvic Exenteration

Overview: Pelvic Exenteration
Workup: Pelvic Exenteration
Treatment: Pelvic Exenteration
Follow-up: Pelvic Exenteration
References

References

  1. Brunschwig A. Complete excision of the pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma. Cancer. 1948;1:177.

  2. Eifel P, Berek JS, Thigpen JT. Cancer of the cervix, vagina and vulva. In: Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997:1433-1478.

  3. Hatch KD, Gelder MS, Soong SJ, et al. Pelvic exenteration with low rectal anastomosis: survival, complications, and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol. Sep 1990;38(3):462-7. [Medline].

  4. Husain A, Curtin J, Brown C, et al. Continent urinary diversion and low-rectal anastomosis in patients undergoing exenterative procedures for recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. Aug 2000;78(2):208-11. [Medline].

  5. Miller B, Morris M, Rutledge F, et al. Aborted exenterative procedures in recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Jul 1993;50(1):94-9. [Medline].

  6. Morley GW, Hopkins MP, Lindenauer SM, Roberts JA. Pelvic exenteration, University of Michigan: 100 patients at 5 years. Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1989;74(6):934-43. [Medline].

  7. Morrow CP, Curtin JP. Surgery for cervical neoplasia. In: Gynecologic Cancer Surgery. First ed. Churchill Livingstone; 1996.

  8. Penalver MA, Barreau G, Sevin BU, Averette HE. Surgery for the treatment of locally recurrent disease. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1996;(21):117-22. [Medline].

  9. Penalver MA, Angioli R, Mirhashemi R, Malik R. Management of early and late complications of ileocolonic continent urinary reservoir (Miami pouch). Gynecol Oncol. Jun 1998;69(3):185-91. [Medline].

  10. Plante M, Roy M. The use of operative laparoscopy in determining eligibility for pelvic exenteration in patients with recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Dec 1995;59(3):401-4. [Medline].

  11. Rose PG, Blessing JA, Gershenson DM, et al. Paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy in recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. Sep 1999;17(9):2676-80. [Medline].

  12. Rutledge FN, Smith JP, Wharton JT, O'Quinn AG. Pelvic exenteration: analysis of 296 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 15 1977;129(8):881-92. [Medline].

  13. Stehman FB, Perez CA, Kurman RJ. Uterine cervix. In: Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:841-918.

  14. Sugiyama T, Yakushiji M, Noda K, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Oncology. 2000;58(1):31-7. [Medline].

  15. Höckel M. Laterally extended endopelvic resection. Novel surgical treatment of locally recurrent cervical carcinoma involving the pelvic side wall. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 2003;91(2):369-77. [Medline].

  16. Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, Smith HO, Anderson PS, Fields AL. Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Experience (1987 to 2003). Gynecol Oncol. May 2006;101(2):261-8. [Medline].

  17. Long HJ 3rd, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr, Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J, et al. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2005;23(21):4626-33. [Medline].

  18. Husain A, Akhurst T, Larson S, Alektiar K, Barakat RR, Chi DS. A prospective study of the accuracy of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) in identifying sites of metastasis prior to pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol. Jul 2007;106(1):177-80. [Medline].

  19. Tran PT, Su Z, Hara W, Husain A, Teng N, Kapp DS. Long-term survivors using intraoperative radiotherapy for recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Oct 1 2007;69(2):504-11. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

pelvic exenteration, anterior exenteration, posterior exenteration, total exenteration, radical resection, supralevator exenteration, infralevator exenteration, vaginectomy, urethrectomy cervical cancer, vaginal cancer, vulvar cancer, uterine cancer, chemotherapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, IORT, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinomas of the cervix, rectal anastomosis, urinary diversion, vaginal reconstruction

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Margrit M Juretzka, MD, MS, Assistant Professor of Gynecologic Oncology, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics
Margrit M Juretzka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society of Gynecologist Oncologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Nelson Teng, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Amreen Husain, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine
Amreen Husain, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Society of Gynecologist Oncologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Jeffrey B Garris, MD, Chief, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine
Jeffrey B Garris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Medical Association, American Urological Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Louisiana State Medical Society, Royal Society of Medicine, and Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Michel E Rivlin, MD, Professor, Coordinator of Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
Michel E Rivlin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Mississippi State Medical Association, and Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center
Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michel E Rivlin, MD, Professor, Coordinator of Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
Michel E Rivlin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Mississippi State Medical Association, and Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.