History of the Procedure
Clark performed the first radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer at Johns Hopkins Hospital in 1895. In 1898, Wertheim, a Viennese physician, developed the radical total hysterectomy with removal of the pelvic lymph nodes and the parametrium. In 1905, Wertheim reported the outcomes of his first 270 patients. The operative mortality rate was 18%, and the major morbidity rate was 31%.
In 1901, Schauta described the radical vaginal hysterectomy and reported a lower operative mortality rate than the abdominal approach. In the late 20th century, radiation therapy became the favored approach because of the high mortality and morbidity of the surgical approach.
In 1944, Meigs repopularized the surgical approach when he developed a modified Wertheim operation with removal of all pelvic nodes (the Wertheim-Clark plus Taussig operation). Meigs reported a survival rate of 75% for patients with stage I disease and demonstrated an operative mortality rate of 1% when these procedures were performed by a specially trained gynecologist. Throughout the remainder of the 20th century, various modifications have been made for this radical procedure, especially in light of improvements in the areas of anesthesia, intensive care, antibiotics, and blood product transfusion science. Finally, the concurrent decrease in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer, the most common rationale for this procedure, has declined over the past several decades and has led to more conservative procedures (ie, conization for early-stage disease) or nonsurgical modalities (ie, radiotherapy).[1]
Problem
Radical hysterectomy was initially developed as a surgical treatment for cervical cancer due to the absence of other modalities for treatment. Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma are the most common variants that arise in the cervix. The uterine cervix comprises the distal third of the uterus. The cervix projects into the vagina and continues up to the lower uterine segment. The portion of the cervix exposed to the vagina is most commonly covered with squamous epithelium. The squamous epithelium transitions to columnar epithelium at the squamocolumnar junction, which is also known as the transformation zone. It is this vulnerable area of the cervix, where columnar cells are actively undergoing metaplastic change to squamous epithelium, in which the majority of cervical malignancies occur.
Epidemiology
Frequency
In 2009, the estimated number of new cervical cancer cases in the United States was 11,270, and approximately 4040 estimated deaths were expected.[2] The death rate from cervical cancer has decreased dramatically since the American Cancer Society recommended the use of the Papanicolaou test (Pap test) for cervical cancer screening in the mid 1940s. Over the next 40 years, the death rate from cervical cancer decreased by more than 70% because preinvasive lesions and cervical cancers were detected at an earlier stage.
Worldwide, the incidence and mortality from cervical cancer is the second major cause of death in women of reproductive age. The lack of a screening cytology program (ie, Pap test) has resulted in this significant problem in the area of women's health. Thus, the most effective strategy of prevention of this malignancy due to the detection of a preinvasive phase is negated and most cases of cervical cancer are not diagnosed until they are advanced in stage and the patient becomes symptomatic.
Etiology
Multiple factors have been associated with the development of cervical cancer. This malignancy most commonly arises at the squamocolumnar junction, where cells are most actively undergoing metaplastic change from columnar epithelium to squamous epithelium.
Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is epidemiologically associated with cervical cancer.[3] Although more than 70 different subtypes of HPV have been identified, women infected with high-risk subtypes have an increased risk of developing dysplasia and a subsequent malignancy. Most notable of the high-risk types are HPV-16 and HPV-18, which have now been classified as carcinogenic in humans. The E6 protein product of these high-risk HPVs binds to the tumor suppressor protein p53, which is thought to disrupt the p53-dependent control of the cell cycle.[4] The E7 protein causes an inactivation of the tumor suppressor retinoblastoma gene (Rb) via its interaction with the Rb protein, whose normal function is seen with the negative control of cell growth.[5]
Cigarette smoking has been associated with an increased severity of dysplasia and is thus a risk factor for cervical cancer. Nicotine, conicotine, hydrocarbons, and tars, carcinogenic breakdown products of cigarette smoke, have been seen concentrated in cervical secretions.[6]
The effect of oral contraceptive use on the risk of cervical cancer is controversial. While some studies have demonstrated that oral contraceptive use for longer than 10 years resulted in an incidence 4 times greater than the risk in those not taking oral contraceptives, one study revealed a risk reduction.[7, 8] To adequately demonstrate an association, such studies must control for sexual behavior and for the interval of last cervical screening in all study groups. Finally, there are no proven benefits from the cessation of oral contraceptives in the clinical management of cervical dysplasia.
Immunosuppression, either induced or acquired (ie, from HIV infection), is now seen as a risk factor for the development of significant preinvasive disease for cervical cancer.[9] In the era of organ transplant and chronic diseases that require systemic immunosuppression, there exists a cohort of patients with increased risk for the development of cervical cancer.
Sexually transmitted diseases, such as those caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, herpes simplex virus, and Trichomonas vaginalis, may be associated with preinvasive disease of the cervix and ultimately a risk for malignancy. With the evidence of HPV as an etiologic agent, such diseases may represent more than a co-infective process and, in fact, they may be a cofactor in the ability for the establishment of the viral infection via disruption of epithelial integrity.
Pathophysiology
Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histologic variant of cervical cancer. HPV is now known to be definitively associated with cervical carcinogenesis and its precancerous precursors, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). The molecular basis for the malignant potential of these viruses has been determined in the dysregulation of the cell cycle by the viral oncogenes E6 and E7.[10]
The progression rate of mild dysplasia to a severe dysplasia or worse is approximately 1% per year; high-grade lesions (moderate and severe dysplasia) have demonstrated a progression to a worsening lesion in approximately 16-36% of cases. Therefore, the treatment strategy for a high-grade lesion usually involves removal of the lesion, but a colposcopically confirmed low-grade lesion can be conservatively managed. The progression time to an invasive malignancy is variable and can span a period of 1 year to several decades.
Adenocarcinoma, the second most common histologic type of cervical cancer, arises from the subcolumnar reserve cells of the columnar endocervical epithelium. A strong association has been demonstrated between cervical adenocarcinoma and HPV-18. The overall incidence for this variant has increased and is associated with women younger than 35 years. Approximately 15% will exhibit no visible lesion due to its endocervical point of origin. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix is strongly associated with an underlying squamous dysplastic lesion and/or cancer in more than 50% of cases, thus making this a high-risk cytologic finding.
Other histologic findings of malignancy involving the cervix include minimal-deviation adenocarcinoma, villoglandular adenocarcinoma, glassy cell carcinoma, adenoid basal carcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, clear cell adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumors. Rarely, cervical lesions result from direct invasion by advanced endometrial, vaginal, bladder, urethra, or colon cancers.
Presentation
Patients with early-stage cervical cancer are relatively asymptomatic; these cases are usually detected via cytologic screening. With the advancement of the disease, signs and symptoms of abnormal bleeding and vaginal discharge may occur. Postcoital bleeding may be the first reported sign in sexually active women; in women who are not sexually active, cervical cancer may not produce clinical manifestations, such as postmenopausal or abnormal uterine bleeding, until the malignancy is in an advanced stage.
As tumors enlarge and outgrow their blood supply, they may become necrotic and produce a malodorous discharge. Larger tumors may cause size-related symptoms such as urinary frequency or retention, rectal pressure, constipation, neurologic symptoms (ie, sciatic pain due to local extension), lower extremity pain, and swelling. Urinary or fecal incontinence due to a local tumor eroding into the bowel or bladder may be the symptom that prompts patients to seek care. Symptomatic anemia may be encountered due to persistent bleeding of the cervical lesion.
The most common sign of cervical cancer is a grossly visible lesion upon a vaginal speculum examination. An exophytic or ulcerative lesion may be obvious during the clinical examination, but an endocervical lesion may remain occult and demonstrate a normal-appearing ectocervical mucosa in the presence of a firm, enlarged cervix. With microinvasive cervical cancer, colposcopic evaluation may provide the means of detection. Colposcopic detection of atypical vessels that demonstrate irregular distribution, unusual caliber, and acute angles are associated with an early invasive tumor of the ectocervix. Presence of any ulcerative or erosive lesion warrants a histologic evaluation by biopsy despite a normal cytologic (Pap test) antecedent result.
The size of the cervix is most accurately determined via a rectal examination, which can also determine the involvement of the adjacent parametrial tissue and/or pelvic side wall. Endocervical lesions expanding or prolapsing through the cervical os can be mistaken for cervical or prolapsing leiomyomata. Biopsy of any abnormally firm or grossly abnormal lesions of the cervix should be undertaken.
The remainder of the physical examination for a patient suspected of a diagnosis of cervical cancer should include a careful evaluation of the vagina, vulva, and rectum for the presence of locally advanced disease. In addition, surveillance of the inguinal, femoral, and supraclavicular lymph nodes by careful palpation should be performed in search of overt evidence of advanced distal disease.
Indications
Radical hysterectomy is indicated for patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer who are medically fit enough to tolerate an aggressive surgical approach and wish to avoid the long-term adverse effects of radiation therapy. Prospective randomized trials have validated equal curative rates from radical surgery and radiotherapy (overall survival similar at 83%). However, increased complication rates are noted with combined radical therapies (ie, requirement for adjuvant radiotherapy).
Currently, with stage IB disease, approximately 54% of patients with tumors 4 cm or less in size (stage IB1) and 84% with tumors greater than 4 cm (stage IB2) will require postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Recent encouraging data for improved outcomes with combined chemoradiation therapy and the increased morbidity noted with the combined surgical and adjuvant radiotherapy has brought into question the role of radical surgery with stage IB2 and stage IIA. However, a review of survival in 4,885 women with stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database showed that radical hysterectomy is superior to primary radiation for the treatment of cervical cancer lesions of < 6 cm, and especially for those < 4 cm.[11]
Young patients who desire ovarian preservation and retention of a functional, nonirradiated vagina are ideal candidates for this procedure. Patients who have relative or absolute contraindications to radiation therapy, such as a pelvic kidney or a history of pelvic abscess or pelvic irradiation, should be afforded surgical treatment. In the setting of recurrence, radical hysterectomy has been performed for very small, centrally recurrent or persistent cancers after radiation therapy. Radical hysterectomy is also indicated for other disease processes that involve the cervix (eg, primary upper vaginal carcinoma, endometrial cancer with involvement of the lower uterine segment or cervix).
Relevant Anatomy
Knowledge of the relevant anatomy of the pelvis is important. The pertinent boundaries are the paravesical space and the pararectal space.
The paravesical space is bordered as follows:
- Medially by the obliterated umbilical artery
- Laterally by the obturator internus muscle
- Posteriorly by the cardinal ligament
- Anteriorly by the pubic symphysis
The pararectal space is bordered as follows:
- Medially by the rectum
- Laterally by the hypogastric artery (the internal iliac artery)
- Posteriorly by the sacrum
- Anteriorly by the cardinal ligament
The pelvic lymphadenectomy is performed in a systematic fashion. The anatomy of this procedure involves stripping all fatty tissue from the mid portion of the common iliac vessels and the internal and external iliac vessels to the level of the circumflex iliac vein distally, with preservation of the genitofemoral nerve on the psoas muscle. The nodal tissue in the obturator fossa is removed from above the obturator nerve to the external iliac vein superiorly and laterally to the pelvic sidewall. Care must be taken in the obturator fossa to avoid injury to the obturator nerve or to an accessory obturator vein, which is present in approximately 20% of patients.
Contraindications
Contraindications to radical hysterectomy include patients who are medically infirm and those who refuse surgical treatment. Because between one third and two thirds of surgical patients require transfusion, radiation therapy should be considered for patients whose religious or personal beliefs prohibit blood product transfusion. As with any other surgery, careful preoperative risk assessment must be performed. A relative contraindication concerns the possible requirements for adjuvant radiotherapy (ie, stage IB2/IIA or intraoperative findings of locally advanced disease with overt parametrial involvement or grossly positive pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes).
O'Dowd MJ, Philipp EE. The History of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Vol 1. New York, NY: Parthenon Publishing Group; 1994:. 543-70.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. Jul-Aug 2009;59(4):225-49. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Franco EL, Duarte-Franco E, Ferenczy A. Cervical cancer: epidemiology, prevention and the role of human papillomavirus infection. CMAJ. Apr 3 2001;164(7):1017-25. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, et al. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell. Dec 21 1990;63(6):1129-36. [Medline].
Jones RE, Wegrzyn RJ, Patrick DR, et al. Identification of HPV-16 E7 peptides that are potent antagonists of E7 binding to the retinoblastoma suppressor protein. J Biol Chem. Aug 5 1990;265(22):12782-5. [Medline].
Hellberg D, Nilsson S, Haley NJ, et al. Smoking and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: nicotine and cotinine in serum and cervical mucus in smokers and nonsmokers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1988;158(4):910-3. [Medline].
Brinton LA, Huggins GR, Lehman HF, et al. Long-term use of oral contraceptives and risk of invasive cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. Sep 15 1986;38(3):399-44. [Medline].
Beral V, Hannaford P, Kay C. Oral contraceptive use and malignancies of the genital tract. Results from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study. Lancet. Dec 10 1988;2(8624):1331-5. [Medline].
Campion MJ. Preinvasive Disease. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF. Practical Gynecologic Oncology. 4th ed. 2005:265-336.
Howley PM. Role of the human papillomaviruses in human cancer. Cancer Res. Sep 15 1991;51(18 Suppl):5019s-5022s. [Medline].
Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Shaw RE, Burke WM, Deutsch I, Wright JD. Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 2009;201(5):485.e1-9. [Medline].
Rose PG, Adler LP, Rodriguez M, Faulhaber PF, Abdul-Karim FW, Miraldi F. Positron emission tomography for evaluating para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: a surgicopathologic study. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1999;17(1):41-5. [Medline].
Lai CH, Yen TC, Ng KK. Surgical and radiologic staging of cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Feb 2010;22(1):15-20. [Medline].
Pecorelli S, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Shepherd JH. FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994-1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jan 1999;64(1):5-10. [Medline].
Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Cerrotta AM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical hysterectomy in FIGO Stage IIIB cervical cancer: feasibility, complications, and clinical outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer. Aug 2009;19(6):1119-24. [Medline].
Patsner B. Radical abdominal hysterectomy using the ENDO-GIA stapler: report of 150 cases and literature review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998;19(3):215-9. [Medline].
Cibula D, Velechovska P, Sláma J, Fischerova D, Pinkavova I, Pavlista D, et al. Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 9 2009;[Medline].
Skret-Magierlo J, Naróg M, Kruczek A, Kluza R, Kluz T, Magon T, et al. Radical hysterectomy during the transition period from traditional to nerve-sparing technique. Gynecol Oncol. Dec 9 2009;[Medline].
Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. May 2009;113(2):191-4. [Medline].
Roy M, Plante M. Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1998;179(6 Pt 1):1491-6. [Medline].
Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1154-61. [Medline].
Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1144-53. [Medline].
Alvarez RD, Soong SJ, Kinney WK, et al. Identification of prognostic factors and risk groups in patients found to have nodal metastasis at the time of radical hysterectomy for early- stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 1989;35(2):130-5. [Medline].
Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2001;6(1):7-43. [Medline].
Brewer CA, Chan J, Kurosaki T, Berman ML. Radical hysterectomy with the endoscopic stapler. Gynecol Oncol. Oct 1998;71(1):50-2. [Medline].
Creasman WT, Zaino RJ, Major FJ, et al. Early invasive carcinoma of the cervix (3 to 5 mm invasion): risk factors and prognosis. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1998;178(1 Pt 1):62-5. [Medline].
Fanning J, Kraus K. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy: survival, recurrence, and late complications. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 2000;79(2):281-3. [Medline].
Fuller AF Jr, Elliott N, Kosloff C, Lewis JL Jr. Lymph node metastases from carcinoma of the cervix, stages IB and IIA: implications for prognosis and treatment. Gynecol Oncol. Apr 1982;13(2):165-74. [Medline].
Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2001;51(1):15-36. [Medline].
Hacker NF. Cervical Cancer. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF. Practical Gynecologic Oncology 4th ed. 2005;337 - 396.
Hockel M, Konerding MA, Heussel CP. Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 1998;178(5):971-6. [Medline].
Janicek MF, Averette HE. Cervical cancer: prevention, diagnosis, and therapeutics. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2001;51(2):92-114; quiz 115-8. [Medline].
Kilgore LC, Orr JW Jr, Hatch KD, et al. Peritoneal cytology in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. Sep 1984;19(1):24-9. [Medline].
Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet. Aug 23 1997;350(9077):535-40. [Medline].
Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1137-43. [Medline].
Orr JW Jr. Cervical cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 1998;7(2):299-316. [Medline].
Orr JW Jr, Orr PJ, Bolen DD, Holimon JL. Radical hysterectomy: does the type of incision matter?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1995;173(2):399-405; discussion 405-6. [Medline].
Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. Apr 2000;18(8):1606-13. [Medline].
Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 2000;79(2):154-7. [Medline].
Randall ME, Michael H, Vermorken J. Uterine Cervix. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC, et al. Principles and Practice of Gynec. 2005;743-822.
Roy M, Plante M, Renaud MC, Tetu B. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Sep 1996;62(3):336-9. [Medline].
Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, et al. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA. Oct 1 1997;278(13):1096-101. [Medline].
Shingleton HM, Orr JW. Historical aspects, pathogenesis, and epidemiology. In: Shingleton HM, Orr JW, eds. Cancer of the Cervix: A Clinical Approach. 1st ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1995:. 1-15.
Shingleton HM, Orr JW. Screening. In: Cancer of the Cervix: A Clinical Approach. 1st ed. Lippincott-Raven;1995:16-33.
Spirtos NM, Schlaerth JB, Kimball RE, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1996;174(6):1763-7; discussion 1767-8. [Medline].
Tarraza HM, Ellerkmann RM. Pelvic radical surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 1998;7(2):399-416. [Medline].
Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, et al. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. May-Jun 2001;11(3):180-6. [Medline].
Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. May 1999;17(5):1339-48. [Medline].
Whitney CW, Stehman FB. The abandoned radical hysterectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. Dec 2000;79(3):350-6. [Medline].

