Radical Hysterectomy Workup

  • Author: Michael J Sundborg, MD, FACOG; Chief Editor: Warner K Huh, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jan 5, 2010
 

Laboratory Studies

  • CBC results can identify patients who are anemic secondary to bleeding from the primary tumor. Preoperative management of anemia is indicated because the average blood loss from a radical hysterectomy is 500-1000 mL. Some reports indicate a negative association between anemia and outcome in patients with cervical cancer. Whether correction of anemia before and during therapy improves survival rates and the progression-free interval is unclear.
  • Serum chemistries are helpful in determining renal function and nutritional status before surgery. An abnormal serum creatinine level may be an indication of ureteral obstruction due to advanced disease, which is a contraindication to surgical management. Low total body protein stores, low albumin level, and uncontrolled hyperglycemia should raise concern regarding the likelihood of successful wound healing after surgery.
  • Preoperative arterial blood gas and pulmonary function tests may be beneficial in risk assessment and in establishing a baseline before surgery in patients with significant pulmonary risk factors. Patients deemed high risk by pulmonary criteria might be better served by radiation therapy.
  • Urinalysis results may indicate preoperative urinary tract infection, which must be treated to avoid possible postoperative febrile morbidity. Additionally, gross or microscopic hematuria may reflect an advanced stage of disease due to bladder or ureter involvement.
  • Cone biopsy of the cervix is essential for the surgical planning for microscopic disease management. It is critical to establish the depth and width of invasion to delineate microscopic stage IA1, IA2, and IB1 in order to execute the correct surgical procedure (extrafascial hysterectomy, modified radical hysterectomy, and type III radical hysterectomy, respectively).
Next

Imaging Studies

  • Chest radiographs help identify effusions or intraparenchymal lesions consistent with distal metastatic disease.
  • Historically, intravenous pyelography (IVP) has been used to identify hydroureter and hydronephrosis, which are indicative of stage III disease. Computed tomography (CT) scanning is now widely used in the preoperative evaluation and planning due to its ability to evaluate the above abnormalities and possible determination of significant lymphadenopathy. However, according to guidelines published by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), only information that could have been obtained by intravenous pyelography, barium enema, and a clinical examination should be used for the clinical staging of cervical cancer.
  • A barium enema can be of assistance in evaluating patients for disease outside the cervix; however, similar information may be obtained from CT scanning and proctoscopy.
  • Bipedal lymphangiography was one of the studies originally allowed in the FIGO staging scheme to look for advanced disease in the lymphatics of the pelvis and paraaortic region. Few radiology departments still offer or are proficient at this procedure.
  • CT scanning has been used as an adjunct to clinical staging because of its ability to simultaneously evaluate the urinary tract for obstruction and determine if the liver, bone, and lymph nodes contain metastatic disease. CT findings may also be helpful in delineating anatomic variances that alter surgical management, such as ureteral duplication or the presence of a pelvic kidney. CT scanning, lymphangiography, and MRI are equally accurate (~84%) in detecting paraaortic metastasis. CT scanning is limited because it can only detect nodes larger than 1 cm. Nodes that are not pathologically enlarged but which contain microscopic tumor cannot be detected on CT scans. Additionally, lymph nodes may be enlarged because of inflammation related to tumor necrosis and may not contain metastatic disease.
  • While CT scanning and MRI are equal in their ability to detect pathologically enlarged lymph nodes, MRI is better at discriminating tumor-containing tissue from non–tumor-containing tissue. This is beneficial when evaluating the patient for factors that may militate against a radical hysterectomy. The patient may be evaluated for tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, and vaginal or parametrial extension as well as nodal involvement. MRI is particularly useful in evaluating pregnant patients diagnosed with cervical cancer because MRI has not been found to be detrimental to the fetus. An optimal treatment plan can be developed based on these findings.
  • Because tumors take up glucose at a higher rate than healthy tissues, positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, which uses a radionuclide-labeled glucose analogue, has been increasingly used for the evaluation of metastatic disease.
    • Rose and colleagues found a 75% positive predictive value and a 92% negative predictive value for PET scanning of the pelvic and para-aortic nodes before lymphadenectomy.[12] Thus, PET may be better able to delineate the presence of subclinical metastatic disease than a preoperative CT or intraoperative evaluation of high-risk regions that includes lymph nodes and parametrial tissue.
    • PET scanning , or PET integrated with CT, has also proved valuable for assessing treatment response after completion of concurrent chemoradiation, documented recurrent cervical cancer, and unexplained elevation of tumor markers posttreatment.[13]
Previous
Next

Diagnostic Procedures

  • Physical examination
    • The physical examination should evaluate the primary lesion and potential sites of metastatic disease, such as the left supraclavicular fossa, lungs, groin, and abdomen. Close inspection of the distal vagina, vulva, urethra, and rectum is warranted to rule out locally advanced disease. Unilateral leg edema may be indicative of disease extending to the sidewall, which causes lymphatic or venous obstruction.
    • The size of the primary lesion and the presence of vaginal or parametrial extension are particularly important for determining the clinical stage and treatment modality. The ideal setting for a thorough evaluation of these areas is an examination under anesthesia.
  • Cystoscopy and proctoscopy
    • Although the ability to detect disease outside the cervix with a stage I tumor is low with these procedures, an evaluation under anesthesia may provide the physician with a better understanding of the clinical disease status and stage. The cervix and vagina can be visualized and palpated, as can the uterosacral ligaments and parametria, via rectovaginal examination.
    • Cystoscopy may reveal cancer that extends through the bladder mucosa directly from the primary lesion. Bullous edema of the bladder does not elevate the stage of disease based on FIGO clinical staging criteria, but it may alert the physician to the presence of lymphatic obstruction of nearby tissue by tumor.
    • Proctoscopy is performed to evaluate for tumor extension into the rectal mucosa.
  • Colposcopy
    • Colposcopy is indicated for patients with abnormal Pap smear results in order to search for the etiology of the abnormal result when no gross lesion has been visualized.
    • Ectocervical carcinomas are traditionally associated with abnormal vessels that vary in their caliber and have acute angles in their distribution. Endocervical lesions may occur in the presence of a normal-appearing ectocervix, and, therefore, the colposcopic appearance may be normal.
    • If an abnormal Pap smear result cannot be explained by a colposcopically detected lesion, then evaluation of the endocervical canal by endocervical curettage should be considered.
  • Cone biopsy
    • Cervical cone biopsy may be indicated if microinvasion is thought possible and the diagnostic biopsy is not deep enough to determine the depth of the lesion.
    • Cone biopsy is also indicated for the following situations:
      • Evaluation of a discrepancy between Pap smear results and colposcopically directed biopsies
      • Inability to visualize the entire lesion during colposcopy
      • Inability to visualize the entire transformation zone at colposcopy
      • Detection of dysplastic cells from endocervical curettage
Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

The most common histologic type of cervical cancer is squamous cell carcinoma, which comprises approximately 85% of all cervical carcinomas. The remainder are usually adenocarcinomas (endocervical or mucinous). More rare epithelial subtypes include adenosquamous, glassy cell, adenoid cystic, adenoid basal, small cell, carcinoid, and undifferentiated.

Previous
Next

Staging

FIGO criteria for staging of cervical cancer are based on clinical findings. The FIGO classification of cervical cancer is as follows[14] :

  • Stage I: Cervical carcinoma is confined to the uterus.
    • Stage IA1: Invasive carcinoma is diagnosable only by microscopy. Stromal invasion is 3 mm deep or less and 7 mm or less in horizontal dimension.
    • Stage IA2: The microscopic depth of invasion is greater than 3 mm and less than 5 mm. Horizontal spread is 7 mm or less.
    • Stage IB1: The lesion is grossly visible and less than 4 cm in diameter. The microscopic lesion has a depth of invasion greater than 5 mm or a horizontal spread greater than 7 mm.
    • Stage IB2: The lesion is grossly visible and greater than 4 cm in diameter.
  • Stage II: Cervical carcinoma invades beyond the uterus but not to the pelvic sidewall or to the lower third of the vagina.
    • Stage IIA: Cervical carcinoma extends down the vagina but does not exceed two thirds of the vaginal length.
    • Stage IIB: Cervical carcinoma extends out into the parametrium but does not extend all the way to the pelvic sidewall.
  • Stage III: Cervical carcinoma extends out to the pelvic sidewall, and/or involves the distal third of the vagina, or causes hydronephrosis or a nonfunctioning kidney.
    • Stage IIIA: Cervical carcinoma involves the lower third of the vagina without extension to the pelvic wall.
    • Stage IIIB: Cervical carcinoma extends out to the pelvic sidewall or causes hydronephrosis or a nonfunctioning kidney.
  • Stage IVA: Tumor invades the bladder or rectal mucosa and/or extends beyond the true pelvis.
  • Stage IVB: Distant metastasis is present.
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Michael J Sundborg, MD, FACOG  Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, F Hebert School of Medicine; Chief and Principle Investigator, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brooke Army Medical Center

Michael J Sundborg, MD, FACOG is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Society of Gynecologist Oncologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Margarett C Ellison, MD  Consulting Staff, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Jeffrey B Garris, MD  Chief, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine

Jeffrey B Garris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Medical Association, American Urological Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Louisiana State Medical Society, Royal Society of Medicine, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Frederick B Gaupp, MD  Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center

Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Warner K Huh, MD  Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Senior Scientist, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama School of Medicine

Warner K Huh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Surgeons, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Massachusetts Medical Society, and Society of Gynecologist Oncologists

Disclosure: MERCK Consulting fee Consulting; GSK Consulting fee Consulting; ROCHE PHARMA/DIAGNOSTICS Consulting fee Consulting; HOLOGICS Consulting fee Consulting; HELIX BIOPHARMA Consulting fee Consulting; COVIDIEN Consulting fee Consulting; INTUITIVE SURGICAL Surgical Proctor

References
  1. O'Dowd MJ, Philipp EE. The History of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Vol 1. New York, NY: Parthenon Publishing Group; 1994:. 543-70.

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. Jul-Aug 2009;59(4):225-49. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  3. Franco EL, Duarte-Franco E, Ferenczy A. Cervical cancer: epidemiology, prevention and the role of human papillomavirus infection. CMAJ. Apr 3 2001;164(7):1017-25. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  4. Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, et al. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell. Dec 21 1990;63(6):1129-36. [Medline].

  5. Jones RE, Wegrzyn RJ, Patrick DR, et al. Identification of HPV-16 E7 peptides that are potent antagonists of E7 binding to the retinoblastoma suppressor protein. J Biol Chem. Aug 5 1990;265(22):12782-5. [Medline].

  6. Hellberg D, Nilsson S, Haley NJ, et al. Smoking and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: nicotine and cotinine in serum and cervical mucus in smokers and nonsmokers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1988;158(4):910-3. [Medline].

  7. Brinton LA, Huggins GR, Lehman HF, et al. Long-term use of oral contraceptives and risk of invasive cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. Sep 15 1986;38(3):399-44. [Medline].

  8. Beral V, Hannaford P, Kay C. Oral contraceptive use and malignancies of the genital tract. Results from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study. Lancet. Dec 10 1988;2(8624):1331-5. [Medline].

  9. Campion MJ. Preinvasive Disease. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF. Practical Gynecologic Oncology. 4th ed. 2005:265-336.

  10. Howley PM. Role of the human papillomaviruses in human cancer. Cancer Res. Sep 15 1991;51(18 Suppl):5019s-5022s. [Medline].

  11. Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Shaw RE, Burke WM, Deutsch I, Wright JD. Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 2009;201(5):485.e1-9. [Medline].

  12. Rose PG, Adler LP, Rodriguez M, Faulhaber PF, Abdul-Karim FW, Miraldi F. Positron emission tomography for evaluating para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: a surgicopathologic study. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1999;17(1):41-5. [Medline].

  13. Lai CH, Yen TC, Ng KK. Surgical and radiologic staging of cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. Feb 2010;22(1):15-20. [Medline].

  14. Pecorelli S, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Shepherd JH. FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994-1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jan 1999;64(1):5-10. [Medline].

  15. Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Cerrotta AM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical hysterectomy in FIGO Stage IIIB cervical cancer: feasibility, complications, and clinical outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer. Aug 2009;19(6):1119-24. [Medline].

  16. Patsner B. Radical abdominal hysterectomy using the ENDO-GIA stapler: report of 150 cases and literature review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998;19(3):215-9. [Medline].

  17. Cibula D, Velechovska P, Sláma J, Fischerova D, Pinkavova I, Pavlista D, et al. Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 9 2009;[Medline].

  18. Skret-Magierlo J, Naróg M, Kruczek A, Kluza R, Kluz T, Magon T, et al. Radical hysterectomy during the transition period from traditional to nerve-sparing technique. Gynecol Oncol. Dec 9 2009;[Medline].

  19. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. May 2009;113(2):191-4. [Medline].

  20. Roy M, Plante M. Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1998;179(6 Pt 1):1491-6. [Medline].

  21. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1154-61. [Medline].

  22. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1144-53. [Medline].

  23. Alvarez RD, Soong SJ, Kinney WK, et al. Identification of prognostic factors and risk groups in patients found to have nodal metastasis at the time of radical hysterectomy for early- stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 1989;35(2):130-5. [Medline].

  24. Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2001;6(1):7-43. [Medline].

  25. Brewer CA, Chan J, Kurosaki T, Berman ML. Radical hysterectomy with the endoscopic stapler. Gynecol Oncol. Oct 1998;71(1):50-2. [Medline].

  26. Creasman WT, Zaino RJ, Major FJ, et al. Early invasive carcinoma of the cervix (3 to 5 mm invasion): risk factors and prognosis. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1998;178(1 Pt 1):62-5. [Medline].

  27. Fanning J, Kraus K. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy: survival, recurrence, and late complications. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 2000;79(2):281-3. [Medline].

  28. Fuller AF Jr, Elliott N, Kosloff C, Lewis JL Jr. Lymph node metastases from carcinoma of the cervix, stages IB and IIA: implications for prognosis and treatment. Gynecol Oncol. Apr 1982;13(2):165-74. [Medline].

  29. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2001;51(1):15-36. [Medline].

  30. Hacker NF. Cervical Cancer. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF. Practical Gynecologic Oncology 4th ed. 2005;337 - 396.

  31. Hockel M, Konerding MA, Heussel CP. Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 1998;178(5):971-6. [Medline].

  32. Janicek MF, Averette HE. Cervical cancer: prevention, diagnosis, and therapeutics. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2001;51(2):92-114; quiz 115-8. [Medline].

  33. Kilgore LC, Orr JW Jr, Hatch KD, et al. Peritoneal cytology in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. Sep 1984;19(1):24-9. [Medline].

  34. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet. Aug 23 1997;350(9077):535-40. [Medline].

  35. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1137-43. [Medline].

  36. Orr JW Jr. Cervical cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 1998;7(2):299-316. [Medline].

  37. Orr JW Jr, Orr PJ, Bolen DD, Holimon JL. Radical hysterectomy: does the type of incision matter?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1995;173(2):399-405; discussion 405-6. [Medline].

  38. Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. Apr 2000;18(8):1606-13. [Medline].

  39. Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol. Nov 2000;79(2):154-7. [Medline].

  40. Randall ME, Michael H, Vermorken J. Uterine Cervix. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC, et al. Principles and Practice of Gynec. 2005;743-822.

  41. Roy M, Plante M, Renaud MC, Tetu B. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Sep 1996;62(3):336-9. [Medline].

  42. Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, et al. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA. Oct 1 1997;278(13):1096-101. [Medline].

  43. Shingleton HM, Orr JW. Historical aspects, pathogenesis, and epidemiology. In: Shingleton HM, Orr JW, eds. Cancer of the Cervix: A Clinical Approach. 1st ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1995:. 1-15.

  44. Shingleton HM, Orr JW. Screening. In: Cancer of the Cervix: A Clinical Approach. 1st ed. Lippincott-Raven;1995:16-33.

  45. Spirtos NM, Schlaerth JB, Kimball RE, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1996;174(6):1763-7; discussion 1767-8. [Medline].

  46. Tarraza HM, Ellerkmann RM. Pelvic radical surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 1998;7(2):399-416. [Medline].

  47. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, et al. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. May-Jun 2001;11(3):180-6. [Medline].

  48. Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. May 1999;17(5):1339-48. [Medline].

  49. Whitney CW, Stehman FB. The abandoned radical hysterectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. Dec 2000;79(3):350-6. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Radical hysterectomy specimen demonstrating the vaginal margin.
Radical hysterectomy specimen demonstrating the parametrial margins.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.