eMedicine Specialties > Obstetrics and Gynecology > Gynecologic Surgery

Carbon Dioxide Laser Surgery for Cervical Dysplasia: Follow-up

Author: Janice L Bacon, MD, Professor and Chair, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Dec 5, 2007

Outcome and Prognosis

Disease eradication and recurrence rates following carbon dioxide laser therapy are often compared with those following cold-knife conization procedures or LEEPs. Outcomes are compared with the assumption that similar preprocedural evaluations (eg, Papanicolaou test, colposcopy, biopsies) have been performed.

Carbon dioxide laser procedures eradicate CIN in up to 90% of cases.19 However, because of the physiology of the HPV, an operative procedure results in a reduced viral load and the excision of overtly diseased tissue, but it does not completely eradicate the virus from the host. Complete eradication is a function of the patient's immune system.

A randomized trial of cryotherapy, carbon dioxide laser vaporization, and a LEEP for CIN reveals relatively equal rates of disease persistence and recurrence after each of the modalities, with follow-up periods from 6-37 months. Recurrences are more likely to occur in older women (aged 30 y or older), women with HPV type 16, and women with prior dysplasia. Persistent disease was more common in women with larger lesions, a factor that, in other studies, has been shown to be better managed by carbon dioxide laser procedures than other modalities.12

Several investigators have found that the results of carbon dioxide laser procedures are similar to those of cold-knife conization procedures or LEEPs for the recurrence of neoplasia. Many recurrences are associated with positive ectocervical or endocervical margins.15

Women infected with HIV have a higher prevalence of CIN than those who are not infected. This is presumably related to coexistent HPV infection and immune function in these patients. Current care recommendations include more frequent surveillance of cervical cytology and more aggressive management using colposcopy, biopsy, and treatment of CIN.

Dysplasia has been noted to recur more often in HIV-positive patients, despite a variety of dysplasia treatment modalities, including carbon dioxide laser procedures. Evaluation of patients with recurrent disease may reveal decreased CD4 counts and increased viral loads.20 One study cited a relative risk for recurrence of 17.517 after standard therapy with negative margins.21 This high risk has resulted in recommendations for excisional therapy rather than ablation22,23 , although excision also carries a higher risk for recurrent disease in the presence of compromised immune status. Even after hysterectomy, HPV infection and neoplasia development are still possible.21

On a more positive note, in immunologically intact women, appropriate dysplasias treated with carbon dioxide laser procedures may result in complete eradication of the HPV genome. In a study by Kjellberg et al, cervical dysplasias ranging from mild to severe were evaluated and documented based on colposcopy and/or biopsy results, and the patients were treated with carbon dioxide laser conization. The presence of HPV in the removed specimen was documented by HPV testing and was positive in 73.2% of patients before excision. At follow-up, only 3 women were positive for HPV, but no women had the same HPV type at 2 follow-up visits over 22-46 months. Only 2 postoperative samples had squamous cell atypia.24

Future and Controversies

The 2001 Bethesda Workshop reaffirmed ASCUS as the designation for squamous atypias that cannot be readily designated as benign or preinvasive. The only subcategory of ASCUS is now ASCUS favoring high-grade SIL. All other prior subsets are now combined under ASCUS, and reflex HPV testing is recommended when the lesion is deemed present after cytologic interpretation. HPV-negative ASCUS is a high-grade SIL or worse in fewer than 1% of cases.25 The results of colposcopy and those of HPV typing have equivalent sensitivity, and both help detect cervical dysplasia that requires treatment, including carbon dioxide laser procedures.

The appropriate long-term follow-up protocol for women with high-risk HPV types and those with unclassified HPV types remains unknown. The most reasonable course of long-term follow-up is not yet determined.

 


More on Carbon Dioxide Laser Surgery for Cervical Dysplasia

Overview: Carbon Dioxide Laser Surgery for Cervical Dysplasia
Workup: Carbon Dioxide Laser Surgery for Cervical Dysplasia
Treatment: Carbon Dioxide Laser Surgery for Cervical Dysplasia
Follow-up: Carbon Dioxide Laser Surgery for Cervical Dysplasia
References

References

  1. Anderson MC, Hartley RB. Cervical crypt involvement by intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. May 1980;55(5):546-50. [Medline].

  2. Jordan JA, Woodman CB, Mylotte MJ, et al. The treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by laser vaporization. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. Apr 1985;92(4):394-8. [Medline].

  3. Dorsey JH, Diggs ES. Microsurgical conization of the cervix by carbon dioxide laser. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1979;54(5):565-70. [Medline].

  4. Duggan MA. Cytologic and histologic diagnosis and significance of controversial squamous lesions of the uterine cervix. Mod Pathol. Mar 2000;13(3):252-60. [Medline].

  5. Viscidi R. Epidemiology of genital tract human papillomavirus infections. In: Apgar BS, Brotzman GL, Spitzer M, eds. Colposcopy, Principles and Practice: An Integrated Textbook and Atlas. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2002.

  6. Wheeler CM. Human Papillomavirus Type-Specific Prevalence. In: Myers G, Baker C, Wheeler CM, eds. Human Papillomaviruses 1996: A Compilation and Analysis of Nucleic Acid and Amino Acid Sequences. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory; 1996:. III112-24.

  7. Lungu O, Sun XW, Felix J, et al. Relationship of human papillomavirus type to grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. JAMA. May 13 1992;267(18):2493-6. [Medline].

  8. Wright TC, Massad S, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests. J Lower Genital Tract Dis. 2007;11:201-222.

  9. Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research. Evaluation of Cervical Cytology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 5. AHCPR Publication No. 99-E010. Bethesda, Md: Bethesda, Md: Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research; February 1999.; February 1999.

  10. Baggish MS. Basic and Advanced Laser Surgery in Gynecology. 2nd ed. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1985:207-16.

  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin number 66, September 2005. Management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2005;106(3):645-64. [Medline].

  12. Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1998;92(5):737-44. [Medline].

  13. Gardeil F, Barry-Walsh C, Prendiville W, Clinch J, Turner MJ. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol. Mar 1997;89(3):419-22. [Medline].

  14. Andersen ES, Nielsen K. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a prospective study of conization as definitive treatment. Gynecol Oncol. Sep 2002;86(3):365-9. [Medline].

  15. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol. Aug 1994;54(2):175-9. [Medline].

  16. Spitzer M. Vaginal estrogen administration to prevent cervical os obliteration following cervical conization in women with amenorrhea. J Lower Genital Tract Dis. 1997;1:53.

  17. Sadler L, Saftlas A. Cervical surgery and preterm birth. Journal of Perintal Medicine. 2007;35:5-9. [Medline].

  18. Sjoborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, Svenningsen R, Herzog C, Kloster-Jensen A, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study. Act Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86:423-428. [Medline].

  19. Jancar N, Rakar S, Poljak M, Fujs K, Kocjan BJ, Vrtacnik-Bokal E. Efficacy of three surgical procedures in eliminating high-risk human papillomavirus infection in women with precancerous cervical lesions. Eur J Gynaec Oncol. 2006;27:239-242. [Medline].

  20. Schafer A, Friedmann W, Mielke M, et al. The increased frequency of cervical dysplasia-neoplasia in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus is related to the degree of immunosuppression. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Feb 1991;164(2):593-9. [Medline].

  21. Tate DR, Anderson RJ. Recrudescence of cervical dysplasia among women who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: a case-control analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2002;186(5):880-2. [Medline].

  22. Maiman M, Fruchter RG, Serur E, et al. Recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1993;82(2):170-4. [Medline].

  23. Fruchter RG, Maiman M, Sedlis A, et al. Multiple recurrences of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with the human immunodeficiency virus. Obstet Gynecol. Mar 1996;87(3):338-44. [Medline].

  24. Kjellberg L, Wadell G, Bergman F, et al. Regular disappearance of the human papillomavirus genome after conization of cervical dysplasia by carbon dioxide laser. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 2000;183(5):1238-42. [Medline].

  25. Solomon D, Schiffman M, Tarone R, et al. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. Feb 21 2001;93(4):293-9. [Medline].

  26. Bar-Am A, Daniel Y, Ron IG, et al. Combined colposcopy, loop conization, and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervial dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78:47-51. [Medline].

  27. dos Santos L, Odunsi K, Lele S. Clinicopathologic outcomes of laser conization for high-grade cervical dysplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004;25(3):305-7. [Medline].

  28. Klobucar A, Hrgovic Z, Bukovic D, et al. The treatment of cervical dysplasia with laser. Med Arh. 2004;58(6):355-7. [Medline].

  29. Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Wright T, Sarkar A, Richards-Kortum R, Hong WK. Cervical human papillomavirus infection and intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1996;(21):17-25. [Medline].

  30. Ueda M, Ueki K, Kanemura M, Izuma S, Yamaguchi H, Nishiyama K, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecologic Oncology. April 2006;101:143-146. [Medline].

  31. Winer RL, Kiviat NB, Hughes JP, Adam DE, Lee SK, Kuypers JM. Development and duration of human papillomavirus lesions, after initial infection. J Infect Dis. Mar 1 2005;191(5):731-8. [Medline].

  32. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. Apr 24 2002;287(16):2120-9. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

CO2 laser surgery, laser surgery, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN, human papilloma virus, HPV, squamous cervical abnormality, squamous carcinoma, squamous cell cancer, squamous intraepithelial lesion, SIL, cervical neoplasia, cervical cancer, cervical malignancy, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, ASCUS, cervical atypia, squamous atypias

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Janice L Bacon, MD, Professor and Chair, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine
Janice L Bacon, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, and South Carolina Medical Association
Disclosure: Organon Pharmaceuticals Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Merck & Company Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Medical Editor

Karen Loeb Lifford, MD, Director of General Gynecology, Associate Program Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Instructor, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Karen Loeb Lifford, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Massachusetts Medical Society, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center
Frederick B Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

David Chelmow, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Program Director, Tufts University Affiliated Hospitals OB/GYN Residency Program; Chair, Tufts University Health Sciences Campus Institutional Review Board
David Chelmow, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Massachusetts Medical Society, Phi Beta Kappa, Sigma Xi, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, and Society for Medical Decision Making
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.