Laboratory Studies
Similar to most cancers of mesenchymal origin, little or nothing is demonstrated by blood work, although the sudden development of profound thrombocytopenia in patients with angiosarcoma may either suggest rapid growth of the primary tumor or herald the development of metastatic disease.
Imaging Studies
- Soft tissue angiosarcoma (extremities, retroperitoneum, abdominal wall)
- MRI: This provides more accurate delineation of the extent of local disease than CT scan. MRI provides sagittal and coronal views and better distinction between bone, vascular structures, and tumor than CT scan. MRI or plain radiographs should address the possibility of bone invasion by the tumor. MRI is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate the tumor response to preoperative radiation or chemotherapy. It can detect changes in tumor size and in the relationship of the mass to adjacent vital structures and can identify areas of intratumoral necrosis or hemorrhage, especially with the use of static or dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging techniques.
- Chest CT scan: This test is more sensitive, although less specific, than conventional tomography in the detection of lung, pleural, and mediastinal metastasis. Searches for bone and brain metastasis rarely are indicated unless symptoms of affectation of these organs are present.
- Bone angiosarcoma[20]
- Radiography: The radiographic presentation of bone angiosarcoma is not specific, but plain radiographic assessment is paramount to characterize lesions and confirm their multiplicity. A solitary lesion (60% of cases) presents as a destructive lytic mass with irregular borders or a mixed lytic-sclerotic pattern and occasional bony expansion. High-grade lesions exhibit features of complete cortical destruction and extension into soft tissue. The vascular nature of the neoplasm can be suggested if synchronous multicentric involvement of several bones of one extremity or anatomic region is present (40% of cases). Bone angiosarcoma can present a distinctive pattern of soap-bubble lesions because it frequently extends up and down the bone. When the spine is involved, the most common pattern is regional involvement in several contiguous vertebral bodies.
- CT scan: This test confirms the permeative, invasive character of the radiographic lesions and their multiplicity.
- MRI: The test findings show a nonspecific decreased or variable signal intensity in T1 and an increased signal in T2. The lesions enhance with gadolinium. MRI is especially helpful in the characterization of the soft tissue extension and involvement of neurovascular structures and joints.
- Bone scan: Delayed whole-body bone scintigraphy shows marked radioisotope uptake, although findings can be negative in aggressive destructive lesions. Radionuclide-tagged RBC scanning is helpful in the differential diagnosis with other multifocal vascular processes of bone and multiple myeloma or Langerhans cell histiocytosis.
- Cutaneous sarcoma: Both CT scan of the head and neck and MRI help in the preoperative planning to evaluate the extent of bone and soft tissue involvement, respectively. These studies help in identifying cervical lymph node affectation.
See related CME at Imaging in the Era of Molecular Medicine.
Procedures
- Biopsy
- Early detection by means of biopsy offers the only realistic chance of a cure. Diagnosis is based on the microscopic features of the biopsy or specimen and the ultrastructural and histochemical markers.
- Appropriate biopsy of an extremity lesion requires avoiding several potential pitfalls. Core-needle biopsies and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are accurate tools; however, larger samples of tissue may be necessary to obtain sections of viable tissue adequate for determination of grade and histologic type.
- Orient the biopsy incision along the long axis of an extremity or parallel to the dominant underlying muscle group on the trunk. An improper biopsy incision may result in a significantly larger surgical defect than otherwise would be necessary to excise the biopsy cavity appropriately.
- In turn, this may result in significantly larger postoperative radiotherapy fields to encompass all tissues at risk. A poorly oriented biopsy tract can even challenge the planned limb salvage procedure.
- The need for adequate hemostasis after a biopsy cannot be overemphasized. Extravasation of blood allows dissemination of tumor cells and therefore increases the volume of tissue requiring treatment.
Histologic Findings
All angiosarcomas have similar microscopic findings, with vascular spaces more or less obvious and lined by tumor cells showing atypia. Low-grade lesions have vascular spaces lined by large plump endothelial cells that penetrate the stroma and papillary fronds of cells that project into the lumen. Higher-grade lesions are more cellular, with atypical cells and abnormal mitoses.
The main problem in the diagnosis of angiosarcoma is histopathologic recognition. Angiosarcoma may be confused with vascular tumors of intermediate malignancy (eg, epithelioid and spindle cell hemangioendotheliomas, histioid hemangioma, and malignant endovascular papillary angioendothelioma). In its more benign form, angiosarcoma may be confused with hemangiomas. In its more aggressive form, irregular sheets of anaplastic cells may have only poorly defined vascular channels and may be difficult to differentiate from anaplastic melanomas and carcinomas.
These tumors also are distinct from other malignant vasoformative tumors, including Kaposi sarcoma and malignant hemangiopericytoma. The diagnosis of angiosarcoma can be confirmed by immunohistochemical staining, described as follows:[11]
- The ultrastructure of tumor cells includes intercellular and intracellular lumina with or without red cells.
- In their cytoplasm, tumor cells contain intermediate filaments (vimentin, occasional tonofilaments [keratin]) and pinocytotic vesicles.
- Weibel-Palade bodies, a marker of endothelial differentiation, may be seen in some cases.
- The vast majority of lesions express vimentin and focally factor VIII–related antigen. Also expressed are CD34 (74%), BNH9 (an endothelial marker, 72%), and cytokeratins (35%).
- Some of the tumors show actin expression, demonstrating a prominent pericytic component. Epithelial membrane antigen is not expressed, which helps to rule out a carcinoma.
- S100 protein and gp100 (HMB-45 antigen, both melanocytic markers) also are not expressed; this helps to rule out melanoma.
- Researchers have shown that anti-CD31 antibodies are one of the most specific endothelial cell markers. However, several other immunohistochemical markers (against factor VIII–associated antigen or the nonimmunologic binding to Ulex Europeans) should be used to avoid misdiagnosis.
Staging
The characteristics of the primary tumor (T), spread to regional lymph nodes (N), and the involvement by the tumor of distant lymph nodes and other distant organs and tissues (metastasis, ie, M), form the basis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging of cancer and are used widely in the United States. The T, N, and M are further divided into Tx, T0, T1, T2, T3, T4; Nx, N0, N1, N2, N3; and Mx, M0, and M1. Tx indicates that the primary tumor cannot be assessed. This indicates carcinoma in situ, and stage IV indicates metastasis.
- Stage I: Localized and resectable tumor is found in 1 location of the liver and could be treated surgically.
- Stage II: Localized and possibly resectable primary tumor is found in 1 or more locations in the organ and may be treated surgically. The decision to treat the disease surgically depends on the experience of the physician.
- Stage III: Advanced cancer has spread to more than 1 location in the organ and/or to other parts of the body. Frequently these tumors require multiple treatment modalities for maximum benefit. Often, surgical resection does not provide benefit to the patient.
- Stage IV: Disseminated cancer involves multiple sites throughout the body. Frequently, surgery is not indicated, and chemotherapy is the best option.
- For bone and soft tissue sarcomas in adults,[6] the 2 most commonly used staging systems are those developed by the AJCC and by Enneking. In children, the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study and the International Union Against Cancer describe the systems used most commonly. These systems for soft tissue sarcomas rely on an ability to determine accurately both the local and distant extent of disease.
- Ia - Low grade, intracompartmental G1/T1/M0
- Ib - Low grade, extracompartmental G1/T2/M0
- IIa - High grade, intracompartmental G2/T1/M0
- IIb - High grade, extracompartmental G2/T2/M0
- IIIa - Low or high grade, intracompartmental G1-G2/T1/M1 with metastases
- IIIb - Low or high grade, extracompartmental G1-2/T2/M1 with metastases
Young RJ, Brown NJ, Reed MW, Hughes D, Woll PJ. Angiosarcoma. Lancet Oncol. Oct 2010;11(10):983-91. [Medline].
Scow JS, Reynolds CA, Degnim AC, Petersen IA, Jakub JW, Boughey JC. Primary and secondary angiosarcoma of the breast: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Surg Oncol. Apr 1 2010;101(5):401-7. [Medline].
Babarovic E, Zamolo G, Mustac E, Strcic M. High grade angiosarcoma arising in fibroadenoma. Diagn Pathol. Dec 20 2011;6(1):125. [Medline].
Terada T. Angiosarcoma of the mandibular gingiva. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4(8):791-3. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Sturgis EM, Potter BO. Sarcomas of the head and neck region. Curr Opin Oncol. May 2003;15(3):239-52. [Medline].
Soft Tissue Tumors. Enzinger FM, Weiss SW, eds. Soft Tissue Tumors. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1995:648-77.
Toro JR, Travis LB, Wu HJ, Zhu K, Fletcher CD, Devesa SS. Incidence patterns of soft tissue sarcomas, regardless of primary site, in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program, 1978-2001: An analysis of 26,758 cases. Int J Cancer. Dec 15 2006;119(12):2922-30. [Medline].
Lezama-del Valle P, Gerald WL, Tsai J, et al. Malignant vascular tumors in young patients. Cancer. Oct 15 1998;83(8):1634-9. [Medline].
Mark RJ, Poen JC, Tran LM, Fu YS, Juillard GF. Angiosarcoma. A report of 67 patients and a review of the literature. Cancer. Jun 1 1996;77(11):2400-6. [Medline].
Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, eds. Cancer. Epidemiology and Prevention. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:763-786/959-974.
Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG. Angiosarcoma of soft tissue: a study of 80 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. Jun 1998;22(6):683-97. [Medline].
Lahat G, Dhuka AR, Hallevi H, Xiao L, Zou C, Smith KD, et al. Angiosarcoma: clinical and molecular insights. Ann Surg. Jun 2010;251(6):1098-106. [Medline].
Wenger DE, Wold LE. Malignant vascular lesions of bone: radiologic and pathologic features. Skeletal Radiol. Nov 2000;29(11):619-31. [Medline].
Morgan MB, Swann M, Somach S, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a case series with prognostic correlation. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 2004;50(6):867-74. [Medline].
DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
Virtanen A, Pukkala E, Auvinen A. Angiosarcoma after radiotherapy: a cohort study of 332 163 Finnish cancer patients. The British Journal of Cancer. Jul 2007;97:115. [Medline].
Patton KT, Deyrup AT, Weiss SW. Atypical vascular lesions after surgery and radiation of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 32 cases analyzing histologic heterogeneity and association with angiosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. Jun 2008;32(6):943-50. [Medline].
Huang J, Mackillop WJ. Increased risk of soft tissue sarcoma after radiotherapy in women with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;Jul 1;92(1):172-80. [Medline].
USA: National Cancer Institute (NCI); 2000-2004. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/.
Mullamitha SA, Ton NC, Parker GJ, Jackson A, Julyan PJ, Roberts C, et al. Phase I evaluation of a fully human anti-alphav integrin monoclonal antibody (CNTO 95) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. Apr 2007;13(7):2128-35. [Medline].
Budd GT. Management of Angiosarcoma. Curr Oncol Rep. 2002;4(6):515-519. [Medline].
Skubitz KM, Haddad PA. Paclitaxel and pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin are both active in angiosarcoma. Cancer. Jul 15 2005;104(2):361-6. [Medline].
Vogt T, Hafner C, Bross K, et al. Antiangiogenetic therapy with pioglitazone, rofecoxib, and metronomic trofosfamidein patients with advanced malignant vascular tumors. Cancer. Nov 15 2003;98(10):2251-6. [Medline].
Liekens S, Verbeken E, De Clercq E, Neyts J. Potent inhibition of hemangiosarcoma development in mice by cidofovir. Int J Cancer. Apr 15 2001;92(2):161-7. [Medline].
Espat NJ, Lewis JJ, Woodruff JM, Antonescu C, Xia J, Leung D, et al. Confirmed angiosarcoma: prognostic factors and outcome in 50 prospectively followed patients. Sarcoma. 2000;4(4):173-7. [Medline].
Kantarjian H, Wolff R, Koller C. MD Anderson Manual of Medical Oncology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2006.
NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.asp.
Adami H, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D, eds. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2008.

