eMedicine Specialties > Oncology > Carcinomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Cholangiocarcinoma: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: Peter E Darwin, MD, Associate Professor, Director of GI Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Andrew Scott Kennedy, MD, Co-Medical Director, Wake Radiology Oncology; Jennifer Lynn Bonheur, MD, Attending Physician, Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jan 8, 2009

Differential Diagnoses

Bile Duct Strictures
Cholecystitis
Bile Duct Tumors
Choledochal Cysts
Biliary Disease
Choledocholithiasis
Biliary Obstruction
Cholelithiasis
Cholangitis

Other Problems to Be Considered

Cholangiohepatitis

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • Routine lab studies
    • Extrahepatic cholestasis is reflected in elevated conjugated (ie, direct) bilirubin levels. Alkaline phosphatase levels usually rise in conjunction with bilirubin levels. Because alkaline phosphatase is of biliary origin, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) also will be elevated.
    • Aminotransferases (ie, aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) may be normal or minimally elevated. Biochemical tests of hepatic function (ie, albumin, prothrombin time [PT]) are normal in early disease.
    • With prolonged obstruction, the prothrombin time (PT) can become elevated because of vitamin K malabsorption. Hypercalcemia may occur occasionally in the absence of osteolytic metastasis.
  • Tumor markers
    • A variety of markers have been tested in bile and serum with limited success. This becomes a significant issue in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), in which clinical features and imaging findings overlap.
    • Tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) can be evaluated in pancreatic and bile duct malignancies, as well as in benign cholestasis. A serum CA 19-9 level greater than 100 U/mL (normal <40 U/mL) has 75% sensitivity and 80% specificity in identifying patients with PSC who have cholangiocarcinoma.9
    • In PSC, an index of markers, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9, has an accuracy of 86% using the following formula: CA 19-9 + (CEA × 40).
    • Cholangiocarcinoma does not produce alpha-fetoprotein.

Imaging Studies

  • A number of potential imaging modalities are available (see Image 2). In general, ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT) is performed initially, followed by a type of cholangiography.
  • Ultrasound may demonstrate biliary duct dilatation and larger hilar lesions.
    • Small lesions and distal cholangiocarcinomas are difficult to visualize.
    • Patients with underlying primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) may have limited ductal dilatation secondary to ductal fibrosis.
    • Doppler ultrasound may show vascular encasement or thrombosis.
  • CT resembles ultrasound in that it may demonstrate ductal dilatation and large mass lesions.
    • CT also has the capability to evaluate for pathologic intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy.
    • Helical CT scans are accurate in diagnosing the level of biliary obstruction. Three-dimensional and multiphase CT images may improve CT yield.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates hepatic parenchyma.
    • MR cholangiography enables imaging of bile ducts and, in combination with MR angiography, permits staging (excluding vascular involvement). Hepatic involvement can also be detected.
    • This technique likely will replace angiography for vascular evaluation.
  • New techniques
    • Preliminary evaluation with positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promise in diagnosing underlying PSC.10 Small lesions (ie, <1 cm) have been demonstrated. PET is accurate for detecting nodular carcinomas, but the sensitivity diminishes for infiltrating lesions. PET should be interpreted with caution in patients with PSC and stents in place. PET/CT has been shown to be valuable in detecting unsuspected distant metastases.11
    • Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) enables both bile duct visualization and nodal evaluation. This technique also has the capability to aspirate for cytologic studies. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration results may be positive when other diagnostic tests are inconclusive.12
    • Intraductal EUS allows direct ultrasonographic evaluation of the lesion.
  • Cholangiography includes MR cholangiography (as noted above), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC).

Other Tests

  • Angiography: Evaluation of vascular involvement is important if considering surgical treatment. Arteriography demonstrating extensive encasement of the hepatic arteries or portal vein precludes curative resection. Combining the findings on cholangiography with those on arteriography has been found to have a greater accuracy in predicting unresectability. However, an occasional patient has compression of vascular structures rather than true malignant invasion.

Procedures

  • ERCP demonstrates the site of obstruction by direct retrograde dye injection and excludes ampullary pathology by endoscopic evaluation.
    • Brush cytology, biopsy, needle aspiration, and shave biopsies via ERCP can provide material for histologic studies.
    • Palliative stenting to relieve biliary obstruction can be performed at the time of evaluation.
  • PTC may allow access to proximal lesions with obstruction of both right and left hepatic ducts. Material for cytologic studies may be obtained and drainage performed.
  • Other methods to obtain tissue include CT- or ultrasound-guided needle aspiration, if a mass lesion is present, and EUS fine-needle aspiration.

Histologic Findings

Classic cholangiocarcinomas are well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas that exhibit glandular or acinar structures; intracytoplasmic mucin is almost always observed. Characteristically, cells are cuboidal or low columnar and resemble biliary epithelium. In more poorly differentiated tumors, solid cords of cells without lumina may be present. Mitotic figures are rare. A dense fibrous stroma is characteristic and may dominate the histologic architecture. It tends to invade lymphatics, blood vessels, perineural and periductal spaces, and portal tracts. Spread along the lumen of large bile ducts can be seen, especially with hilar tumors.

Tumor cells provoke variable desmoplastic reactions. Cytologic studies on material obtained by any method often yield nondiagnostic results secondary to desmoplastic reaction. For this reason, sensitivity and positive predictive value of brush cytologic studies are rather poor for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Staging

The American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines in the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Fifth Edition, following the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification system, with depth of tumor penetration and regional spread defined pathologically, should be followed.

  • T - Primary tumor
    • TX - Primary tumor cannot be assessed
    • T0 - No evidence of primary tumor
    • TIS - Carcinoma in situ
    • T1a - Tumor invades mucosa
    • T1b - Tumor invades muscularis
    • T2 - Tumor invades perimuscular connective tissue
    • T3 - Tumor invades liver, gallbladder, duodenum, stomach, pancreas, or colon
  • N - Regional lymph nodes
    • NX - Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
    • N0 - No metastases in regional lymph nodes
    • N1 - Metastases in cystic duct or pericholedochal or hilar lymph nodes of hepatoduodenal ligament
    • N2 - Metastases in peripancreatic (head only), periduodenal, posterior pancreatoduodenal, periportal, celiac, or superior mesenteric regional lymph nodes
  • M - Metastasis
    • MX - Presence of metastases cannot be assessed
    • M0 - No distant metastases
    • M1 - Distant metastases (includes lymph node metastases beyond N2)
  • TNM groupings by stage
    • Stage 0 - TIS N0 M0
    • Stage I - T1 N0 M0
    • Stage II - T2 N0 M0
    • Stage III - T1-2 N1-2 M0
    • Stage IVa - T3 N0-2 M0
    • Stage IVb - T1-3 N0-2 M1

More on Cholangiocarcinoma

Overview: Cholangiocarcinoma
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Cholangiocarcinoma
Treatment & Medication: Cholangiocarcinoma
Follow-up: Cholangiocarcinoma
Multimedia: Cholangiocarcinoma
References

References

  1. Douglass HO, Tepper J, Leichman L. Neoplasms of the extrahepatic bile ducts. In: Holland JF, et al, eds. Cancer Medicine. Vol 2. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger. 1993:1455-62.

  2. Lake JR. Benign and malignant neoplasms of the gallbladder, bile ducts and ampulla. In: Sleisinger MH, Fordtran JS, eds. Gastrointestinal Disease. 5th ed. Vol 2. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders. 1993:1891-1902.

  3. Lotze MT, Flickinger JC, Carr BI. Hepatobiliary neoplasms. In: Devita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg S. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 4th. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott; 1993:883-907.

  4. de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, et al. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med. Oct 28 1999;341(18):1368-78. [Medline].

  5. Klatskin G. Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. An unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med. Feb 1965;38:241-56. [Medline].

  6. Clary B, Jarnigan W, Pitt H, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. Mar-Apr 2004;8(3):298-302. [Medline].

  7. American Cancer Society Statistics. Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths, 2007. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/stt/CFF2007EstCsDths07.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2008.

  8. Biliary Tract Cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J. Cancer. Epidemiology and Prevention. 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press; 2006:787-800.

  9. Chalasani N, Baluyut A, Ismail A, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a multicenter case-control study. Hepatology. Jan 2000;31(1):7-11. [Medline].

  10. Keiding S, Hansen SB, Rasmussen HH, et al. Detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis by positron emission tomography. Hepatology. Sep 1998;28(3):700-6. [Medline].

  11. Petrowsky H, Wildbrett P, Husarik DB. Impact of Integrated PET and CT on staging and management of glabladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2006;Epub Apr 19.

  12. Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering DC, Knoefel WT, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol. Jan 2004;99(1):45-51. [Medline].

  13. Ortner MA, Liebetruth J, Schreiber S, et al. Photodynamic therapy of nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. Mar 1998;114(3):536-42. [Medline].

  14. Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, et al. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. Nov 2003;125(5):1355-63. [Medline].

  15. Simmons DT, Baron TH, Peterson BT. A Novel Endoscopic Approach to Brachytherapy in the Management of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;Epub ahead of print.

  16. Thongprasert S, Napapan S, Charoentum C, Moonprakan S. Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in inoperable biliary tract carcinoma. Ann Oncol. Feb 2005;16(2):279-81. [Medline].

  17. Thongprasert S. The role of chemotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2005;16 Suppl 2:ii93-6. [Medline].

  18. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.asp.

  19. Heimbach JK, Haddock MG, Alberts SR, et al. Transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Transpl. Oct 2004;10(10 Suppl 2):S65-8. [Medline].

  20. Gunderson LL, Willett CG. Pancreas and hepatobiliary tract. In: Perez CA, Brady LW, et al. Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 1998. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1467-1488.

  21. Kew MC. Tumors of the liver. In: Zakim D, Boyer TD, eds. Hepatology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders. 1996:1513-1548.

  22. Lillemoe K, Kennedy A, Picus J. Clinical management of carcinoma of the biliary tree. In: Kelsen DP, Daly JM, Kern SE, et al. Gastrointestinal Oncology: Principles and Practices. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

  23. Uchida M, Ishibashi M, Tomita N, et al. Hilar and suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: value of 3D angiography and multiphase fusion images using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 2005;184(5):1572-7. [Medline].

  24. Yalcin S. Diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinomas: a comprehensive review. Hepatogastroenterology. Jan-Feb 2004;51(55):43-50. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

cholangiocarcinoma, CCC, biliary duct system, perihilar tumors, Klatskin tumors, adenocarcinoma, primary sclerosing cholangitis, PSC

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Peter E Darwin, MD, Associate Professor, Director of GI Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Peter E Darwin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Andrew Scott Kennedy, MD, Co-Medical Director, Wake Radiology Oncology
Andrew Scott Kennedy, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Cancer Research, American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jennifer Lynn Bonheur, MD, Attending Physician, Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital
Jennifer Lynn Bonheur, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, New York Academy of Sciences, New York Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP, Nellie B Smith Chair of Oncology Emeritus, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Missouri/Ellis Fischel Cancer Center
Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Missouri State Medical Association
Disclosure: Bionumerik Consulting fee Consulting; Proactya Consulting fee Consulting; GSK Consulting fee Consulting; NovoNordisk Consulting fee Consulting; Amgen Honoraria Speaking and teaching; GSK Consulting fee Speaking and teaching

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Benjamin Movsas, MD, Vice-Chairman, Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center
Benjamin Movsas, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Radium Society, and American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Rajalaxmi McKenna, MD, FACP, Southwest Medical Consultants, SC, Department of Medicine, Good Samaritan Hospital, Advocate Health Systems
Rajalaxmi McKenna, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jules E Harris, MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine at Tucson; Consulting Staff, Arizona Cancer Center
Jules E Harris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Immunologists, American Society of Hematology, and Central Society for Clinical Research
Disclosure: GlobeImmune Salary Consulting; Amplimed Consulting fee Consulting; FibroGen Consulting fee Consulting

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.