eMedicine Specialties > Oncology > Carcinomas of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System
Ependymoma
Updated: Jan 26, 2009
Introduction
Background
Ependymomas are glial tumors that arise from ependymal cells within the central nervous system (CNS). They were first described by Bailey in 1924. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification scheme for these tumors includes 4 divisions based on histologic appearance: WHO grade I, myxopapillary ependymoma and subependymoma; WHO grade II, ependymoma (with cellular, papillary, and clear cell variants); WHO grade III, anaplastic ependymoma. Myxopapillary ependymomas are considered a biologically and morphologically distinct variant of ependymoma, occurring almost exclusively in the region of the cauda equina and behaving in a more benign fashion than grade II ependymoma. Subependymomas are uncommon lesions that share the benign features of myxopapillary ependymomas. Ependymoblastomas are now considered a primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) and are distinct from ependymoma.
Intracranial ependymomas present as intraventricular masses with frequent extension into the subarachnoid space,1 while spinal ependymomas present as intramedullary masses arising from the central canal or exophytic masses at the conus and cauda equina.
The anatomic distinction between intracranial and spinal locations has an epidemiologic and clinical correlate. In children, approximately 90% of ependymomas are intracranial, with the majority of these usually arising from the roof of the fourth ventricle (infratentorial). In adults and adolescents, 75% of ependymomas arise within the spinal canal, with a significant minority occurring intracranially in the supratentorial compartment.2
Treatment of patients with ependymomas depends upon neurosurgical intervention to facilitate definitive diagnosis and to decrease tumor burden. Postoperative adjuvant therapy can include brain or spine radiation, chemotherapy, and radiosurgery.
Pathophysiology
Ependymomas are traditionally thought to arise from oncogenetic events that transform normal ependymal cells into tumor phenotypes. The precise nature and order of these genetic events are unknown; however, significant progress has been made toward delineating mutations that segregate with various tumor phenotypes. Some evidence now suggests that radial glia may be the cells of origin.3,4
In 1988, Dal Chin and colleagues described cytogenetic studies on a supratentorial ependymoma from a 3-year-old girl that showed a t(10;11;15)(p12.2;q13.1;p12) and loss of one X chromosome.5 This relatively simple karyotypic change was not observed in the analysis of 4 ependymomas published 1 year later. In 1 of the 4 ependymomas studied, translocations involving chromosomes 9, 17, and 22 were observed together with loss of the normal chromosome 17. A second ependymoma had many chromosomal alterations that included a translocation between chromosomes 1 and 2 and rearrangements involving chromosome 17. Consistent genetic alterations were not detected in the remaining 2 cases.
These initial studies underscore the molecular heterogeneity that can exist among histologically identical tumors. Subsequent studies have identified more consistent genetic defects as follows: a loss of loci on chromosome 22, a mutation of p53 in malignant ependymoma,6 a recurring breakpoint at band 11q13,7 abnormal karyotypes with frequent involvement of chromosome 6 and/or 16,8 and NF2 mutations. Clustering of ependymomas has been reported in some families, with segregation analysis in one family suggesting the presence of an ependymoma tumor suppressor gene in the region of the chromosome 22 locus loss (22pter-22q11.2).9,10,11,12,13
The ultimate goal of genetic studies is to demonstrate a causal relationship between specific mutations and tumor progression. Current efforts in the field are directed toward identifying another tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 22.
Frequency
United States
Frequency of ependymomas is similar to that in other parts of the world.
International
Intracranial ependymomas represent 6-9% of primary CNS neoplasms and account for 30% of primary CNS neoplasms in children younger than 3 years.14
Mortality/Morbidity
Depending on the patient population, the reported 10-year overall survival rate for ependymoma can vary from 45-55%. The current 5-year survival rate for patients with intracranial ependymomas is approximately 50%, when rates from children and adults are combined.15 Stratification based on age reveals 5-year survival rates of 76% in adults and 14% in children.
Race
Grade II and III ependymoma are more common in black Americans than white Americans16
Sex
The incidence of ependymoma is approximately equal in males and females.
Age
Ependymomas generally present in young children with a mean age of diagnosis of 4 years, yet 25-40% of patients are younger than 2 years. Spinal ependymomas are most common in patients aged 15-40 years, most of which are of a myxopapillary subtype. Intracranial tumors are seen more often in children, particularly in the infratentorial compartment.
Clinical
History
The clinical history associated with ependymomas varies depending upon the age of the patient and the location of the lesion. The duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis usually varies from 1-36 months; most patients have symptoms from 3-6 months.
- For children with masses in the fourth ventricle, a history of progressive lethargy, headache, nausea, and vomiting may be experienced secondary to increased intracranial pressure from obstructive hydrocephalus. As the tumor extends along the floor of the fourth ventricle, it may cause multiple cranial-nerve palsies (primarily VI-X), as well as cerebellar dysfunction.
- For those children who present prior to closure of cranial sutures, enlarging head circumference secondary to obstructive hydrocephalus also may be part of the clinical history.
- Supratentorial ependymomas may be associated with increased intracranial pressure manifested as headache, nausea, vomiting, and cognitive impairment. Headaches can vary in intensity and quality and are frequently more severe in the early morning or upon first awakening.
- Changes in personality, mood, and concentration can be early indicators or may be the only abnormalities observed. Seizures are a presenting symptom in 20% of patients, and focal neurologic deficits may also be prominent.
- Spinal ependymomas are usually associated with a history of progressive neurologic deficit related to involvement of ascending or descending nerve tracts, exiting peripheral nerves, and pain that correlates with the level of the lesion.
- Dissemination of the tumor through the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is observed in fewer than 10% of patients at diagnosis when ependymoblastomas are excluded. The incidence is higher with infratentorial ependymomas than with supratentorial tumors (9% vs 1.6%).
Physical
- Intracranial ependymoma
- Neurologic symptoms and signs affecting patients with intracranial ependymoma can be either general or focal, and they reflect the location of the tumor.
- At the time of diagnosis, the most common signs of infratentorial ependymomas include papilledema and ataxia. Nystagmus is present in 40-50% of patients at the time of diagnosis.
- Supratentorial lesions often present with hemiparesis, sensory loss, visual loss, aphasia, and cognitive impairment.
- Cervical/thoracic ependymoma
- Patients with spinal tumors in the upper segments of the cervical cord can present with pain or paresthesia in the occipital or cervical region, stiffness of the neck, and weakness and wasting of neck muscles.
- Below the lesion, a spastic tetraplegia or hemiplegia and weakness of the ventrolateral region may occur.
- Cutaneous sensation may be affected below the lesion with concurrent involvement of the descending trigeminal nucleus.
- When considering radicular symptoms associated with cervical tumors, note that nerve roots in the cervical region exit above the pedicle of the like-numbered vertebra. Anatomically, the cervical nerve root exits in close relation to the undersurface of the pedicle through the neural foramen.
- Characteristic findings associated with various cervical and upper thoracic levels are outlined as follows:
- C4 (paralysis of the diaphragm)
- C5 (atrophic paralysis of the deltoid, biceps, supinator longus, rhomboid, and spinate muscles): The upper arms hang limp at the side. The sensory level extends to the outer surface of the arm. The biceps and supinator reflexes are lost.
- C6 (paralysis of triceps and wrist extensors): The forearm is held semiflexed, and a partial wrist drop is present. The triceps reflex is lost. Sensory impairment extends to a line running down the middle of the arm slightly to the radial side.
- C7 (paralysis of the flexors of the wrist and of the flexors and extensors of the fingers): Efforts to close the hands result in extension of the wrist and slight flexion of the fingers (ie, preacher's hand). The sensory level is similar to that of the sixth cervical segment but slightly more to the ulnar side of the arm.
- C8 (atrophic paralysis of the small muscles of the hand with resulting clawhand [main-en-griffe]): Horner syndrome, unilateral or bilateral, results from lesions at this level and is characterized by the triad of ptosis, small pupil (ie, miosis), and loss of sweating on the face. Sensory loss extends to the inner aspect of the arm and involves the fourth and fifth fingers and the ulnar aspect of the middle finger.
- T1: Lesions rarely cause motor symptoms because this nerve root provides little functional innervation of the small hand muscles. Other signs of cervical tumors include nystagmus, especially with tumors in the upper segment. This condition is presumably caused by damage to the descending portion of the median longitudinal fasciculus. Horner syndrome may be found with intramedullary lesions in any portion of the cervical cord if the descending sympathetic pathways are affected.
- Thoracic ependymoma
- Unlike the cervical or lumbar region of the cord where motor dysfunction is easily discernible, tumors in the thoracic region are localized more by the sensory examination.
- Determining the location of lesions in the upper half of the thoracic cord by testing the strength of intercostal muscles is difficult.
- The Beevor sign, in which the umbilicus moves upward when the supine patient attempts to flex the head on the chest against resistance, can be used to localize lesions below T10.
- Abdominal skin reflexes usually are absent below the lesion.
- Lumbar ependymoma
- The location of a lumbar lesion can be deduced easily from the patient's root level of sensory loss and associated motor weakness.
- Radicular pain and weakness are associated with nerve root compression. In the lumbar region, the nerve root exits below and in close proximity to the pedicle of its like-numbered vertebra with the intervertebral disc space situated well below the pedicle.
- Tumors that compress only the first and second lumbar segments cause loss of the cremasteric reflexes. The abdominal reflexes are preserved, while knee and ankle jerks are increased.
- If the tumor affects the third and fourth segments of the lumbar cord and does not involve the roots of the cauda equina, weakness of the quadriceps, loss of the patellar reflexes, and hyperactive Achilles reflexes occur. More commonly, lesions at this level also involve the cauda equina with resulting flaccid paralysis of the legs as well as loss of knee and ankle reflexes.
- If the spinal cord and cauda equina are affected concurrently, spastic paralysis of one leg with increased ankle reflexes ipsilaterally and flaccid paralysis with loss of reflexes contralaterally may occur.
- Myxopapillary ependymoma of the conus and cauda equina
- The presenting symptom of tumors that involve the conus or cauda equina is pain in the back, rectal area, or both lower legs, often leading to a misdiagnosis of sciatica. Although the two regions are related anatomically, several clinical features can serve to distinguish lesions of the conus from those of the cauda equina.
- Spontaneous pain is rarely associated with conus lesions, whereas it is usually the most prominent symptom in patients who have cauda equina lesions. The pain of a cauda equina lesion is severe and radicular in nature, involving the perineum, thighs, and legs, often asymmetrically. The pain of a conus lesion is usually bilateral and symmetric. Symmetric saddle anesthesia and dissociation mark the sensory deficit of a conus lesion secondary to the compromise of crossing fibers. Patients with sensory deficits attributable to cauda equina lesions do not have dissociation and often present with unilateral or asymmetric findings. Motor dysfunction is symmetric for conus lesions and asymmetric for cauda equina lesions. Autonomic dysfunction, such as bladder dysfunction and impotence, is typically an early sign in patients with conus medullaris lesions, whereas it is a late finding in patients with cauda equina lesions.
- Patients with spinal tumors in the conus and cauda equina can have a combination of symptoms. As the tumor grows, flaccid paralysis of the legs, atrophy of the leg muscles, and foot drop may occur. Fasciculations may be observed in the atrophied muscles. Sensory loss may affect the perianal or saddle area as well as the remaining sacral and lumbar dermatomes. This loss may be slight, or it may be so severe that a trophic ulcer develops over the lumbosacral region, buttocks, hips, or heels. Signs of raised intracranial pressure may be observed with ependymomas of this region if the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein content is high.
Causes
- Ependymomas have no known environmental cause.
- As noted earlier in Pathophysiology, a number of genetic mutations have been associated with ependymomas. However, a causal relationship between these mutations and tumor progression has not yet been determined.
- Intramedullary ependymomas have been associated with neurofibromatosis type I.
More on Ependymoma |
Overview: Ependymoma |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Ependymoma |
| Treatment & Medication: Ependymoma |
| Follow-up: Ependymoma |
| Multimedia: Ependymoma |
| References |
| Next Page » |
References
Applegate GL, Marymont MH. Intracranial ependymomas: a review. Cancer Invest. 1998;16(8):588-93. [Medline].
Schwartz TH, Kim S, Glick RS, et al. Supratentorial ependymomas in adult patients. Neurosurgery. Apr 1999;44(4):721-31. [Medline].
Poppleton H, Gilbertson RJ. Stem cells of ependymoma. Br J Cancer. Jan 15 2007;96(1):6-10. [Medline].
Taylor MD, Poppleton H, Fuller C, Su X, Liu Y, Jensen P, et al. Radial glia cells are candidate stem cells of ependymoma. Cancer Cell. Oct 2005;8(4):323-35. [Medline].
Dal Cin P, Sandberg AA. Cytogenetic findings in a supratentorial ependymoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Feb 1988;30(2):289-93. [Medline].
Metzger AK, Sheffield VC, Duyk G, et al. Identification of a germ-line mutation in the p53 gene in a patient with an intracranial ependymoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep 1 1991;88(17):7825-9. [Medline].
Sainati L, Montaldi A, Putti MC, et al. Cytogenetic t(11;17)(q13;q21) in a pediatric ependymoma. Is 11q13 a recurring breakpoint in ependymomas?. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Apr 1992;59(2):213-6. [Medline].
Mazewski C, Soukup S, Ballard E, et al. Karyotype studies in 18 ependymomas with literature review of 107 cases. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Aug 1999;113(1):1-8. [Medline].
Nijssen PC, Deprez RH, Tijssen CC, et al. Familial anaplastic ependymoma: evidence of loss of chromosome 22 in tumour cells. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Oct 1994;57(10):1245-8. [Medline].
Yokota T, Tachizawa T, Fukino K, Teramoto A, Kouno J, Matsumoto K. A family with spinal anaplastic ependymoma: evidence of loss of chromosome 22q in tumor. J Hum Genet. 2003;48(11):598-602. [Medline].
Ebert C, von Haken M, Meyer-Puttlitz B, et al. Molecular genetic analysis of ependymal tumors. NF2 mutations and chromosome 22q loss occur preferentially in intramedullary spinal ependymomas. Am J Pathol. Aug 1999;155(2):627-32. [Medline].
Hulsebos TJ, Oskam NT, Bijleveld EH, Westerveld A, Hermsen MA, van den Ouweland AM. Evidence for an ependymoma tumour suppressor gene in chromosome region 22pter-22q11.2. Br J Cancer. Dec 1999;81(7):1150-4. [Medline].
James CD, He J, Carlbom E, et al. Loss of genetic information in central nervous system tumors common to children and young adults. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Jul 1990;2(2):94-102. [Medline].
McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG. Incidence patterns for ependymoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results study. J Neurosurg. Dec 5 2008;[Medline].
Bouffet E, Perilongo G, Canete A, Massimino M. Intracranial ependymomas in children: a critical review of prognostic factors and a plea for cooperation. Med Pediatr Oncol. Jun 1998;30(6):319-29; discussion 329-31. [Medline].
Polednak AP, Flannery JT. Brain, other central nervous system, and eye cancer. Cancer. Jan 1 1995;75(1 Suppl):330-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Macdonald J. Advances in imaging techniques in neuroendocrine tumors: miscellaneous papers of interest. Curr Opin Oncol. Feb 1990;2(1):117-8. [Medline].
Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA. Practical guidelines for the treatment of malignant gliomas. West J Med. Feb 1998;168(2):114-20. [Medline].
Merchant TE. Current management of childhood ependymoma. Oncology (Williston Park). 2002/05;16(5):629-42, 644; discussion 645-6, 648.
Timmermann B, Kortmann RD, Kühl J, Meisner C, Slavc I, Pietsch T. Combined postoperative irradiation and chemotherapy for anaplastic ependymomas in childhood: results of the German prospective trials HIT 88/89 and HIT 91. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jan 15 2000;46(2):287-95. [Medline].
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Adult Intracranial Ependymomas. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cns.pdf. Accessed Jan 2009.
Rogers L, Pueschel J, Spetzler R, et al. Is gross-total resection sufficient treatment for posterior fossa ependymomas?. J Neurosurg. Apr 2005;102(4):629-36. [Medline].
Merchant TE, Li C, Xiong X, Gaber MW. Cytokine and Growth Factor Responses After Radiotherapy for Localized Ependymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Nov 17 2008;[Medline].
Goldwein JW, Glauser TA, Packer RJ, et al. Recurrent intracranial ependymomas in children. Survival, patterns of failure, and prognostic factors. Cancer. Aug 1 1990;66(3):557-63. [Medline].
Chiu JK, Woo SY, Ater J, et al. Intracranial ependymoma in children: analysis of prognostic factors. J Neurooncol. Jul 1992;13(3):283-90. [Medline].
Stafford SL, Pollock BE, Foote RL, Gorman DA, Nelson DF, Schomberg PJ. Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent ependymoma. Cancer. Feb 15 2000;88(4):870-5. [Medline].
Partap S, Fisher PG. Update on new treatments and developments in childhood brain tumors. Curr Opin Pediatr. Dec 2007;19(6):670-4. [Medline].
Reni M, Gatta G, Mazza E, Vecht C. Ependymoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. Jul 2007;63(1):81-9. [Medline].
Tabori U, Ma J, Carter M, Zielenska M, Rutka J, Bouffet E, et al. Human telomere reverse transcriptase expression predicts progression and survival in pediatric intracranial ependymoma. J Clin Oncol. Apr 1 2006;24(10):1522-8. [Medline].
Sowar K, Straessle J, Donson AM, Handler M, Foreman NK. Predicting which children are at risk for ependymoma relapse. J Neurooncol. May 2006;78(1):41-6. [Medline].
Modena P, Lualdi E, Facchinetti F, Veltman J, Reid JF, Minardi S, et al. Identification of tumor-specific molecular signatures in intracranial ependymoma and association with clinical characteristics. J Clin Oncol. Nov 20 2006;24(33):5223-33. [Medline].
Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Van Dongen HR, Mulder PG, et al. Tumour type and size are high risk factors for the syndrome of "cerebellar" mutism and subsequent dysarthria. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Dec 1999;67(6):755-7. [Medline].
Doxey D, Bruce D, Sklar F, et al. Posterior fossa syndrome: identifiable risk factors and irreversible complications. Pediatr Neurosurg. Sep 1999;31(3):131-6. [Medline].
Healey EA, Barnes PD, Kupsky WJ, Scott RM, Sallan SE, Black PM. The prognostic significance of postoperative residual tumor in ependymoma. Neurosurgery. May 1991;28(5):666-71; discussion 671-2. [Medline].
Carrie C, Mottolese C, Bouffet E, Negrier S, Bachelot TH, Lasset C. Non-metastatic childhood ependymomas. Radiother Oncol. Aug 1995;36(2):101-6. [Medline].
McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG. Both location and age predict survival in ependymoma: a SEER study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jan 2009;52(1):65-9. [Medline].
Tomita T, McLone DG, Das L, Brand WN. Benign ependymomas of the posterior fossa in childhood. Pediatr Neurosci. 1988;14(6):277-85. [Medline].
Sutton LN, Goldwein J, Perilongo G, Lang B, Schut L, Rorke L. Prognostic factors in childhood ependymomas. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1990-1991;16(2):57-65. [Medline].
Jayawickreme DP, Hayward RD, Harkness WF. Intracranial ependymomas in childhood: a report of 24 cases followed for 5 years. Childs Nerv Syst. Jul 1995;11(7):409-13. [Medline].
Pollack IF, Gerszten PC, Martinez AJ, et al. Intracranial ependymomas of childhood: long-term outcome and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery. Oct 1995;37(4):655-66; discussion 666-7. [Medline].
Robertson PL, Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, et al. Survival and prognostic factors following radiation therapy and chemotherapy for ependymomas in children: a report of the Children's Cancer Group. J Neurosurg. Apr 1998;88(4):695-703. [Medline].
Horn B, Heideman R, Geyer R, Pollack I, Packer R, Goldwein J. A multi-institutional retrospective study of intracranial ependymoma in children: identification of risk factors. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. May-Jun 1999;21(3):203-11. [Medline].
Merchant TE, Mulhern RK, Krasin MJ, Kun LE, Williams T, Li C. Preliminary results from a phase II trial of conformal radiation therapy and evaluation of radiation-related CNS effects for pediatric patients with localized ependymoma. J Clin Oncol. Aug 1 2004;22(15):3156-62. [Medline].
Bailey P. Tumors arising from ependymal cells. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1924;11:1-27.
Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Severson RK, Stanton B, Hamre M, Sloan AE. Pediatric brain tumors in non-Hispanics, Hispanics, African Americans and Asians: differences in survival after diagnosis. Cancer Causes Control. Jun 2005;16(5):587-92. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Bijlsma EK, Voesten AM, Bijleveld EH, et al. Molecular analysis of genetic changes in ependymomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Aug 1995;13(4):272-7. [Medline].
Birch BD, Johnson JP, Parsa A, et al. Frequent type 2 neurofibromatosis gene transcript mutations in sporadic intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas. Neurosurgery. Jul 1996;39(1):135-40. [Medline].
Duffner PK, Krischer JP, Sanford RA, Horowitz ME, Burger PC, Cohen ME. Prognostic factors in infants and very young children with intracranial ependymomas. Pediatr Neurosurg. Apr 1998;28(4):215-22. [Medline].
Goldwein JW, Leahy JM, Packer RJ, et al. Intracranial ependymomas in children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Dec 1990;19(6):1497-502. [Medline].
Guyotat J, Signorelli F, Desme S, Frappaz D, Madarassy G, Montange MF. Intracranial ependymomas in adult patients: analyses of prognostic factors. J Neurooncol. Dec 2002;60(3):255-68. [Medline].
Kramer DL, Parmiter AH, Rorke LB, et al. Molecular cytogenetic studies of pediatric ependymomas. J Neurooncol. Mar 1998;37(1):25-33. [Medline].
Lyons MK, Kelly PJ. Posterior fossa ependymomas: report of 30 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. May 1991;28(5):659-64; discussion 664-5. [Medline].
Neumann E, Kalousek DK, Norman MG, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of 109 pediatric central nervous system tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Nov 1993;71(1):40-9. [Medline].
Ransom DT, Ritland SR, Kimmel DW, et al. Cytogenetic and loss of heterozygosity studies in ependymomas, pilocytic astrocytomas, and oligodendrogliomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Nov 1992;5(4):348-56. [Medline].
Rogatto SR, Casartelli C, Rainho CA, Barbieri-Neto J. Chromosomes in the genesis and progression of ependymomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Sep 1993;69(2):146-52. [Medline].
Ross GW, Rubinstein LJ. Lack of histopathological correlation of malignant ependymomas with postoperative survival. J Neurosurg. Jan 1989;70(1):31-6. [Medline].
Rubio MP, Correa KM, Ramesh V, et al. Analysis of the neurofibromatosis 2 gene in human ependymomas and astrocytomas. Cancer Res. Jan 1 1994;54(1):45-7. [Medline].
Slavc I, MacCollin MM, Dunn M, et al. Exon scanning for mutations of the NF2 gene in pediatric ependymomas, rhabdoid tumors and meningiomas. Int J Cancer. Aug 22 1995;64(4):243-7. [Medline].
Stratton MR, Darling J, Lantos PL, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in human ependymomas. Int J Cancer. Oct 15 1989;44(4):579-81. [Medline].
Stüben G, Stuschke M, Kroll M, Havers W, Sack H. Postoperative radiotherapy of spinal and intracranial ependymomas: analysis of prognostic factors. Radiother Oncol. Oct 1997;45(1):3-10. [Medline].
Tominaga T, Kayama T, Kumabe T, et al. Anaplastic ependymomas: clinical features and tumour suppressor gene p53 analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;135(3-4):163-70. [Medline].
Vagner-Capodano AM, Gentet JC, Gambarelli D, et al. Cytogenetic studies in 45 pediatric brain tumors. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Jul-Sep 1992;9(3):223-35. [Medline].
Vanuytsel L, Brada M. The role of prophylactic spinal irradiation in localized intracranial ependymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Aug 1991;21(3):825-30. [Medline].
von Haken MS, White EC, Daneshvar-Shyesther L, et al. Molecular genetic analysis of chromosome arm 17p and chromosome arm 22q DNA sequences in sporadic pediatric ependymomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Sep 1996;17(1):37-44. [Medline].
Weremowicz S, Kupsky WJ, Morton CC, Fletcher JA. Cytogenetic evidence for a chromosome 22 tumor suppressor gene in ependymoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Jul 15 1992;61(2):193-6. [Medline].
Wernicke C, Thiel G, Lozanova T, et al. Involvement of chromosome 22 in ependymomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Feb 1995;79(2):173-6. [Medline].
Yates AJ. An overview of principles for classifying brain tumors. Mol Chem Neuropathol. Oct 1992;17(2):103-20. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
ependymoma diagnosis, ependymoma treatment, ependymoma pictures, spinal cord tumors, cellular ependymoma, papillary ependymoma, clear cell ependymoma, anaplastic ependymoma, myxopapillary ependymoma, subependymoma, glial tumor, ependymal cell, CNS tumor, CNS malignancy, central nervous system tumor, central nervous system malignancy, brain cancer, spinal cancer


Overview: Ependymoma