Updated: Jul 29, 2009
Primary testicular tumors are the most common solid malignant tumor in men between the ages of 20 and 35 years in United States. For unknown reasons, the incidence of this cancer increased during the last century. Over the past decade, the incidence of testicular cancer has risen approximately 1.2% per year but the absolute mortality rate has been stable or decreasing; approximately 9,000 new cases have been diagnosed in United States every year, and only about 350 to 400 deaths have occurred annually. The American Cancer Society estimates that about 8,400 new cases of testicular cancer will be diagnosed during 2009 in the United States.1 It is estimated that 380 men will die of testicular cancer in 2009. The lifetime chance of developing testicular cancer is about 1 in 300 and the risk of dying is very low—about 1 in 5,000.
In the past, metastatic testicular cancer was usually fatal, but recent advances in treatment, including high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue, have considerably improved the prognosis. Indeed, testicular cancer is a bright spot in the oncological landscape and are now considered the model for the treatment of solid tumors.
Testicular cancers are very sensitive to chemotherapy and are curable even when metastatic. Cure rates for good-risk disease cure rates are 90-95%. On , there were approximately 190,265 men alive in the United States who had a history of cancer of the testis.
The cause of testicular cancer is not known. The characteristic genetic change found is an isochromosome of the short arm of chromosome 12 [i(12p)], which is often seen in sporadic cancers. This suggests that genes in this region are important in the development of germ cell tumors. A number of other genes that have a relatively weak effect are also involved in the development of testicular cancer.
That genetic factors have a role in the development of testicular cancer is shown by the fact that the risk for the disease is higher in first-degree relatives of cancer patients than in the general population. About 2% of testicular cancer patients report having an affected relative. Siblings are at particularly increased risk, with a relative risk of 8–10. For sons of affected men, the relative risk is 4–6.
Two models of testicular carcinoma in situ have been proposed. The first posits that fetal gonocytes whose development into spermatogonia is blocked may undergo abnormal cell division and then invasive growth mediated by postnatal and pubertal gonadotropin stimulation.
The second model postulates that the most likely target cell for transformation is the zygotene-pachytene spermatocyte. During this stage of germ cell development, aberrant chromatid exchange events associated with crossing over can occur. Normally, these cells are eliminated by apoptosis. On occasion, this crossing over may lead to increased 12p copy number and overexpression of the cyclin D2 gene (CCND2). The cell carrying this abnormality is relatively protected against apoptotic death because of the oncogenic effect of CCND2, leading to re-initiation of the cell cycle and genomic instability.
Malignant transformation of germ cells is the result of a multistep process of genetic changes. One of the earliest events is the increased copy number of 12p, either as 1 or more copies of i(12p) or as tandem duplications of chromosome arm 12p. This abnormality is found in occult carcinoma in situ lesions as well as more advanced disease. Further studies indicate that CCND2 is present at chromosome band 12p13 and that CCND2 is overexpressed in most germ cell tumors, including carcinoma in situ. Amplification of CCND2 activates cdk4/6, allowing the cell to progress through the G1-S checkpoint.
Testicular cancers are not a common malignancy. Approximately 9,000 new cases are diagnosed in the United States each year. From 2002–2006, the median age at diagnosis was 34 years of age.
In the United States, the incidence increased by 100% from 1988 to 2001. Diagnoses of seminomas increased 124% during that period and diagnoses of nonseminomas increased by 64%. No significant increase occurred in the incidence of early-stage disease in proportion to all diagnoses in this population, indicating that the increase was not due to more widespread screening or earlier detection.2
According to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from 17 geographic areas, the age-adjusted annual incidence of testicular cancer from 2002–2006 was 5.4 per 100,000 men. However, the incidence varies widely by race/ethnicity (see below).
Studies published between 1980 and 2002 showed a clear trend towards an increased testicular cancer incidence in the last 30 years in the majority of industrialized countries in North America, Europe, and Oceania. Differences in incidence were seen between neighboring countries (2.5/100,000 cases in Finland versus 9.2/100,000 cases in Denmark) as well as among regions of the same country (2.8 to 7.9/100,000 within France). The increase in incidence was significantly associated with a birth cohort effect in the United States and in European countries. Substantial differences in the incidence and trends were observed among ethnic groups. Incidence by race are described above.
Testicular cancers are highly curable, even in patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis. The prognosis depends upon the histologic type of cancer (seminoma versus nonseminoma), stage, and other features such as tumor marker and type of metastatic disease.
Patients with seminomas that confer a good prognosis, which constiute about 90% of seminomas, have a 5-year survival of 86%; patients with good-prognosis nonseminomas (56% of nonseminomas) have a 5-year survival of 92%. With intermediate-prognosis cancers (28% of nonseminomas), 5-year survival is 72% with seminomas and 80% with nonseminomas. With poor-prognosis nonseminomas (about 16% of nonseminomas) 5-year survival is 48%.
Those survival data are based on patients treated between 1975 and 1990; more recent studies has shown much better survival with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). Pooled 5-year survival estimates for NSGCT were 94% for good-prognosis, 83% for intermediate-prognosis, and 71% for poor-prognosis tumors.
The incidence of testicular cancer is fivefold higher in whites than in African Americans; however, African Americans tend to present with higher-grade disease and have much worse prognosis than whites.3
| Incidence of Testicular Cancer by Race | |
| Race/Ethnicity | Annual rate per 100,000 men |
| All Races | 5.4 |
| White | 6.3 |
| Black | 1.3 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 1.7 |
| American Indian/Alaska Native | 4.6 |
| Hispanic | 4.0 |
Testicular cancer can occur at any age but is most common between the ages of 15 and 35 years. There is also secondary peak in incidence after age 60. Seminoma is rare in boys younger than 10 years of age but is the most common histologic type in men older than 60.
Localized disease:
Painless swelling or nodule of one testicle is the most common presenting symptom. On the physical exam this mass/nodule can not be separated from the testis. Patients with atrophic testes will feel enlargement. Dull ache or heavy sensation in the lowed abdomen could be presenting symptom. Patients who experience a hematoma with trauma should undergo evaluation to rule out testicular cancer.
Metastatic disease:
Disseminated disease have symptom of lymphatic or hematogenous spread. Presenting symptom could be neck mass in supraclavicular lymph node metastatic disease, anorexia, nausea and other gastrointestinal symptom. Bulky retroperitoneal disease could present as back pain. Cough, chest pain, hemoptysis and shortness of breath could be presenting symptom of mediastinal adenopathy or lung metastatic disease. Central nervous system disease could rarely present as neurological symptoms. Bone pain is rare.
Gynecomastia may occur in about 5% of patients with testicular germ cell tumor that produce human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), such as choriocarcinoma and is a systemic manifestation. Marked overproduction of hCG can develop hyperthyroidism since hCG and thyroid stimulating hormone have a common alpha-subunit and a beta-subunit with considerable homology.
Any solid, firm mass within the testis should be considered testicular cancer until proven otherwise. Prompt diagnosis and early treatment are required for cure.
Testicular cancer may be painless, in which case they are sometimes ignored by the patient. In patients with scrotal pain, testicular cancer must be differentiated form epididymitis. The clinician should consider the full differential diagnosis of a testicular mass, which includes not only epididymitis but epididymo-orchitis, testicular torsion, hydrocele, hernia, hematoma, spermatocele, varicocele, and syphilitic gumma.
Unilateral or bilateral lower extremity swelling may be present in iliac or caval venous obstruction or thrombosis.
Physical examination of the testicles is performed by fully palpating all areas of the testicle between thumb and fingers. Examination should begin with bimanual examination of the scrotal contents, starting with the normal testis. This permits the examiner to evaluate the relative size, contour, and consistency of the normal testis. Other areas of emphasis include examination of the abdomen for lymphadenopathy and hepatomegaly. The examination should also include evaluation for supraclavicular nodes, bone tenderness, and gynecomastia.
Various risk factors have been associated with testicular tumors, but the specific etiology is not known.
Cryptorchidism
In patients with cryptorchidism, the riskof developing germ cell tumor is increased fourfold to eightfold. The risk of developing germ cell tumor when a cryptorchid testis is intra-abdominal is about 5%. The risk is 1% if the testis is retained in the inguinal canal. Surgical placement of the undescended testis in the scrotum—orchiopexy—when the patient is younger than 6 years lowers the risk further. About 5-20% of patients with a history of cryptorchid testis develop tumors in the normally descended testis.
In Sweden from 1965 to 2000, a total of 16,983 men underwent orchiopexy and 56 cases of testicular cancer were reported. The relative risk of testicular cancer among those who underwent orchiopexy before reaching 13 years of age was 2.23, compared with that of the Swedish general population. For those treated at 13 years of age or older, the relative risk was 5.4.4
Prior Testicular Cancer| Abdominal Hernias | Orchitis |
| Epididymitis | Spermatocele |
| Hydrocele | Testicular Torsion |
| Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin | Varicocele |
Epididymo-orchitis
Hematoma
Leukemia
Metastasis from other cancers such as lung cancer, melanoma, and prostate cancer
Syphilitic gumma
Trauma
Tuberculosis and other testicular infections
The workup of patients with suspected testicular cancer includes a complete history and physical examination. Blood should be obtained for a chemistry profile including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), complete blood count, and serum tumor markers including alpha fetoprotein (AFP), and the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG).
Serum levels of AFP and/or beta-hCG are elevated in approximately 80% to 85% of patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs), even when nonmetastatic. Patients with pure seminoma may have elevated levels of beta-hCG but do not have elevated AFP levels. If AFP is elevated in patients with pure seminoma then the presence of an NSGCT component should be considered.
Elevation of serum beta-hCG and AFP levels, alone or in combination, is not sufficiently sensitive or specific to establish the diagnosis of testicular cancer in the absence of histologic confirmation, although markedly elevated levels are rarely found in normal individuals. However, AFP, beta-hCG, and LDH levels are vital in the evaluation and management of patients with testicular cancers. They are used for determining diagnosis, staging, and prognosis and for following response to therapy. Obtaining levels of AFP, beta-HCG, and LDH in patients in whom testicular cancer are suspected is mandatory prior to treatment, as is monitoring of these levels during and after treatment.
Radical inguinal orchiectomy and r etroperitoneal lymph node dissection
Cellular Classification
Approximately 95% of testicular tumors are germ cell tumors. These are divided into two types: pure seminoma (no nonseminomatous element present) and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Less than 50% of malignant testicular germ cell tumors are of a single cell type; roughly 50% of these are seminomas. Determining the cell type of these tumors is important for estimating the risk of metastasis and the response to chemotherapy.
The World Health Organization uses following histologic classification of malignant testicular germ cell tumors.
1. Intratubular germ cell neoplasia, unclassified.
2. Malignant pure germ cell tumor (showing a single cell type):
A. Seminoma
B. Embryonal carcinoma
C. Teratoma
D. Choriocarcinoma
E. Yolk sac tumor
3. Malignant mixed germ cell tumor (showing more than one histologic pattern):
A. Embryonal carcinoma and teratoma with or without seminoma.
B. Embryonal carcinoma and yolk sac tumor with or without seminoma.
C. Embryonal carcinoma and seminoma.
D. Yolk sac tumor and teratoma with or without seminoma.
E. Choriocarcinoma and any other element.
4. Polyembryoma
Seminoma
Nonseminoma
Mixed germ cell tumors (ie, those containing two or more germ cell types) constitute approximately one third of testicular cancer. Mixed germ cell tumor behave like nonseminomas. The average age at diagnosis is older than 30 years.
Staging for testicular cancer follows the TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) system:
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage Groupings
The AJCC stage groupings use both TNM staging and serum tumor marker levels. The designation SX indicates that markers were unavailable or not performed; S0 indicates normal levels. The table below defines other S categories.
Table. Serum Tumor Markers
Stage | LDH | HCG (mIU/mL) | AFP (ng/mL) |
S1 | <1.5 times normal | <5,000 | <1,000 |
S2 | 1.5-10 times normal | 5,000-50,000 | 1,000-10,000 |
S3 | >10 times normal | >50,000 | >10,000 |
Used with the permission of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Chicago, Illinois.
Intermediate- risk nonseminoma
Poor-risk nonseminoma
Testicular cancers are curable even in the presence of metastatic disease. If the cancer progresses or recurs despite initial chemotherapy, these patients are candidates for salvage therapy.
Nonseminoma is more aggressive than seminoma. When the elements of both seminoma and nonseminoma are present or the AFP concentration is elevated, the tumor should be treated as a nonseminoma.
Initial therapy is selected according to AJCC stage group; risk stratification (good, intermediate, or poor risk), as per the guidelines of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group7 ; and histology (seminoma versus nonseminoma).
Current guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the National Cancer Institute recommend treatment approach keyed to AJCC staging. These treatment groups are as follows:
Seminoma stage IIA and IIB
Active surveillance is not an option. These patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
Recurrent disease and salvage treatment
Patients who do not have a complete response to first-line therapy, or whose disease recurs after complete response, are categorized into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups.
Surgical resection is recommended for patients with residual disease after chemotherapy. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) should clear the region of residual disease. Open nerve-sparing RPLND is preferred over laparoscopic RPLND. Patients in whom RPLND reveals viable cancer (in approximately 60% of patients, postchemotherapy residual masses are either viable cancer or teratoma) are treated with subsequent chemotherapy. Open nerve-sparing RPLND has multiple complications, including retrograde ejaculation and other infertility issues.
Fertility and sperm banking
Because 45% to 55% of testicular cancer patients have azoospermia or oligospermia at or beyond 2 years after therapy, those patients who wish to preserve fertility should be offered semen cryopreservation before the start of therapy.13 Some experts recommend performing a baseline sperm count and sperm banking prior to the radiographic diagnostic evaluation, to avoid radiation exposure of the sperm. An increased rate of fetal malformations has not been reported in the subsequent offspring of men who have retained fertility after treatment for testicular cancer.
Chemotherapy regimens for testicular cancers are divided into initial and salvage chemotherapy, according to tumor stage, status, and risk stratification.
Initial chemotherapy regimens
Carboplatin (for stage I seminoma)
Carboplatin AUC 7 x 1 cycle or 2 cycles
BEP (5-day schedule)
Bleomycin 30 U or 30 mg IV bolus day 1, 8, 15 or day 2, 9, 16
Etoposide (VP-16) 100 mg/m2/day IV for five days
Cisplatin (CDDP) 20 mg/m2/day IV for five days
This regimen is administered for 3 to 4 cycles at 21-day intervals
EP
Etoposide (VP-16) 100 mg/m2/day IV daily for five days
Cisplatin (CDDP) 20 mg/m2/day IV daily for five days
This regimen is administered for 4 cycles at 21-day intervals
VIP (for patients with underlying lung disease)
Etoposide (VP-16) 75 mg/m2/day IV daily for five days
Ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day IV daily for five days
Cisplatin (CDDP) 20 mg/m2/day IV for days one through five
Mesna 120 mg/m2 slow IV bolus is given before ifosfamide day one, followed by 1,200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion on days one through five
This regimen is administered for 4 cycles at 21-day intervals
VeIP (for patients who received prior etoposide)
Vinblastine 0.11 mg/kg/ IV daily for 2 days
Ifosfamide 1,200 mg/m2 IV daily for five days
Mesna 400 mg/m2 IV every 8 hours for 5 days
Cisplatin (CDDP) 20 mg/m2 IV daily for five days
This regimen is administered for 4 cycles at 21-day intervals
TIP
Paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 IV day one followed by Ifosfamide 1500mg/m2 IV daily days 2-5 and Cisplatin (CDDP) 25 mg/m2 IV daily on days 2-5
Mesna 500 mg/m2 IV before ifosfamide, and then 4 and 8 hrs after each dose of ifosfamide daily on days 2-5
This regimen is administered for 4 cycles at 21-day intervals
GEMOX (palliative second line)
Gemcitabine 1,000 or 1,250 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV on day 1 administered every 3 weeks
Glycosidic derivative of podophyllotoxin that exerts its cytotoxic effect through stabilization of the normally transient covalent intermediates formed between DNA substrate and topoisomerase II, leading to single- and double-strand DNA breaks. This causes cell proliferation to arrest in late S or early G2 portion of the cell cycle.
Therapy should be withheld or suspended if platelet counts are <50,000 or absolute neutrophil counts are <500/mm3. Reduce dose 20% for granulocytic fever or previous radiotherapy. Reduce dose in hepatic (increased total bilirubin [TB]) and renal (decreased CrCl) impairment.
100 mg/m2/d IV for 5 d; repeat q21d for 4 cycles; adjust dose in hepatic or renal dysfunction
TB 1.5-3 mg/dL: 50% dose reduction
TB 3.1-4.9 mg/dL: 75% dose reduction
TB >5 mg/dL: Avoid use
CrCl 15-50 mL/min: 25% dose reduction
Not established
May prolong the effects of warfarin and increase the clearance of methotrexate; cyclosporine and etoposide have additive effects in the cytotoxicity of tumor cells
Documented hypersensitivity; significant hypotension; IT administration may cause death
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Bleeding and severe myelosuppression may occur
Group of glycopeptides extracted from Streptomyces species. Each molecule has a planar end and an amine end; different glycopeptides of the group differ in their terminal amine moieties. Planar end intercalates with DNA, while amine end facilitates oxidation of bound ferrous ions to ferric ions, thereby generating free radicals, which subsequently cleave DNA, acting specifically at purine-G-C-pyrimidine sequences.
Not absorbed when given orally; peak levels reached in about 30-60 min when given IM and are only one third of levels obtained after IV administration; approximately 50% of drug absorbed systemically after intrapleural or intraperitoneal administration; systemic absorption after intracavitary administration for craniopharyngioma not negligible.
Volume of distribution is 20-30 L both in intracellular and extracellular fluid.
Less than 10% is bound to plasma proteins.
Bleomycin has plasma half-life of less than 1 h and terminal half-life of 2-4 h, but it could be as long as 22 h in patients with renal dysfunction or those previously treated with cisplatin.
About 50% eliminated in urine within 24 h. Most tissues (known exceptions—skin and lungs) contain an enzyme, bleomycin hydrolase (most active tissues are liver and kidney), which readily inactivates drug; therefore, toxicity is tissue specific, occurring in tissues lacking this enzyme. Bleomycin mostly used systemically in combination with other drugs (mostly with cisplatin and vincristine).
Principal mechanisms of resistance include high levels of bleomycin hydrolase, cell mutations altering DNA sequences to prevent intercalation, poor cell accumulation of drug, and rapid plasma removal. None of these factors plays important role when bleomycin administered locally in residual cyst.
Toxicity is age dependent and cumulative dose related; systemic administration mostly causes pulmonary toxicity. This consists of pneumonitis, which can progress to fatal pulmonary fibrosis.
Maximum recommended total cumulative dose for systemic use is 400 U. Unit measurement based on toxicity to bacteria; 1 U equals approximately 1.7 mg.
Administered systemically, does not produce significant bone marrow toxicity. Toxicity with local administration due to both systemic contamination (when anaphylactoid reactions, transient fever, nausea, and vomiting could occur) and leakage into surrounding neural tissue. Fatal outcome has been reported with leakage, due to subsequent diffuse diencephalon and brainstem edema.
Contrast CT cystography is required prior to intracavitary administration to ensure cyst wall integrity; when inconclusive, MR cystography with gadopentetate dimeglumine has been advocated.
Test dose (optional): 1-2 U IV/IM prior to full dose
30 U IV bolus every wk on days 2, 9, and 16; repeat q21d for 4 cycles; modify dose based on CrCl
CrCl 20-30 mL/min: 50% of normal dose
CrCl <20 mL/min: 40% of normal dose
Not established
May decrease plasma levels of digoxin and phenytoin; cisplatin may increase toxicity of bleomycin when administered systemically
Documented hypersensitivity; significant renal function impairment; compromised pulmonary function
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Caution in renal impairment; possibly secreted in breast milk; may cause mutagenesis and pulmonary toxicity (10%); idiosyncratic reactions similar to anaphylaxis (1%), may occur; monitor for adverse effects during and after treatment; vaso-occlusive phenomenon with distal necrosis of digit; permanent damage to nail matrix may occur
Platinum-containing compound that exerts antineoplastic effect by covalently binding to DNA with preferential binding to N-7 position of guanine and adenosine. Can react with 2 different sites on DNA to cause cross-links. Platinum complex also can bind to nucleus and cytoplasmic protein. A bifunctional alkylating agent, once activated to aquated form in cell, binds to DNA, resulting in interstrand and intrastrand cross-linking and denaturation of double helix.
Modify dose on basis of CrCl. Avoid use if CrCl <60 mL/min.
20 mg/m2/d IV over 20-60 min for 5 d; repeat q21d for 4 cycles
Not established
Increases toxicity of bleomycin and ethacrynic acid
Documented hypersensitivity, pre-existing renal insufficiency, myelosuppression, and hearing impairment
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Administer adequate hydration before and 24 h after cisplatin dosing to reduce risk of nephrotoxicity; myelosuppression, ototoxicity, nausea and vomiting, may occur
Alkylating agent activated in liver to phosphoramide mustard and acrolein. Phosphoramide mustard cross-links DNA strands and is responsible for therapeutic effect. Acrolein related to bladder toxicity.
1200 mg/m2/d IV continuous infusion on days 1-5; repeat q21d for 4 cycles
Not established
Phenobarbital, phenytoin, chloral hydrate, and other drugs that interfere with cytochrome P-450 activity, may alter effects of ifosfamide
Documented hypersensitivity; depressed bone marrow function
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
May cause hemorrhagic cystitis and severe myelosuppression; caution in renal function impairment or compromised bone marrow reserve
Platinum-based antineoplastic agent forms interstrand and intrastrand Pt-DNA crosslinks that inhibit DNA replication and transcription. Cytotoxicity is cell-cycle nonspecific.
Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 IV on day one with Gemcitabine administered every three wks
Not established
Documented hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin or other platinum compounds
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Anaphylaxis may occur within minutes of administration; may cause neuropathy, pulmonary fibrosis, bone marrow suppression, GI tract symptoms (eg, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis), renal or hepatic toxicity (decrease dose), or thromboembolism; dilute IV only in dextrose-containing solution
Analog of cisplatin. This is a heavy metal coordination complex that exerts its cytotoxic effect by platination of DNA, a mechanism analogous to alkylation, leading to interstrand and intrastrand DNA crosslinks and inhibition of DNA replication. Binds to protein and other compounds containing SH group. Cytotoxicity can occur at any stage of the cell cycle, but cell is most vulnerable to action of these drugs in G1 and S phase.
Has same efficacy as cisplatin but with better toxicity profile. Main advantages over cisplatin include less nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity not requiring extensive prehydration, less likely to induce nausea and vomiting, but more likely to induce myelotoxicity.
Dose is based on the following formula: total dose (mg) = (target AUC) x (GFR+25) where AUC (area under plasma concentration-time curve) is expressed in mg/mL/min and GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is expressed in mL/min.
AUC 7
600 mg/m2 IV on day 2 of therapy, or the following formula has been used in clinical trials: 6 X (uncorrected GFR + [15 X surface area])
Nephrotoxicity increases with aminoglycosides and other nephrotoxic drugs
Documented hypersensitivity; bone marrow suppression
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Monitor bone marrow function
Mechanisms of action are tubulin polymerization and microtubule stabilization.
250 mg/m2 IV over 24 h q3wk
200 mg/m2 IV infused over 24 hours has been used in pediatric trials
Coadministration with cisplatin may further increase myelosuppression
Documented hypersensitivity to paclitaxel or polyoxyethylated castor oil; peripheral neuropathy; bone marrow suppression; liver failure; severe cardiac disease
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Premedicate with steroids, H1, and H2 blockers to decrease risk of hypersensitivity reactions; myelosuppression, alopecia, arthralgia/myalgias, and cardiac arrhythmia may occur
Vinca alkaloid, inhibits microtubule formation, which disrupts formation of mitotic spindle, causing cell proliferation to arrest at metaphase.
0.11 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 2; repeat q21d for 4 cycles; adjust dose in hepatic impairment
TB >3 mg/dL: 50% dose reduction
Not established
Phenytoin plasma levels may be reduced when administered concomitantly with vinblastine; with mitomycin, the toxicity of vinblastine may significantly increase; CYP450 3A4 inhibitors (eg, itraconazole, erythromycin,
quinupristin/dalfopristin) may decrease clearance, thus increasing toxicity
Documented hypersensitivity and bone marrow suppression
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Caution in patients diagnosed with impaired liver function and neurotoxicity; when patient is receiving mitomycin C, monitor closely for shortness of breath and bronchospasm
Cytidine analog, after intracellular metabolism to active nucleotide, inhibits ribonucleotide reductase and competes with deoxycytidine triphosphate for incorporation into DNA. Cell-cycle specific for S phase.
This drug has been shown to have activity in a phase 2 trial against relapsed germ cell tumors.
1000 or 1200 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 every three wks
1.2 g/m2 IV infused over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-d cycles has been used in pediatric trials
None reported
Documented hypersensitivity
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
May cause myelosuppression (particularly thrombocytopenia); toxicities include flu like syndrome, LFT abnormality, maculopapular rash, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, hematuria, proteinuria, and hemolytic uremic syndrome; clearance reduced in women and elderly individuals
Inactivates acrolein and prevents urothelial toxicity without affecting cytostatic activity.
1200 mg/m2/d IV continuous infusion on days 1-6 of each cycle; IV dose of mesna equivalent to ifosfamide dose
Not established
May increase warfarin effects
Documented hypersensitivity
B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals
Does not prevent hemorrhagic cystitis in all patients (monitoring for hematuria in the morning prior to ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide dose required); does not prevent or alleviate other toxicities associated with ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide; common adverse effects include hypotension, headache, GI toxicity, and limb pain
Seminoma stage IA, IB: History and physical examination (H & P) and AFP, beta-hCG, and LDH assays every 3 to 4 months for the first three years, every 6 months for years 4 to 7, then annually up to 10 years. Abdominal and pelvic CT scan is recommend at each visit and chest x-ray at alternate visits. Strict adherence to this surveillance program for at least 10 years is vital.
Seminoma stage IS: H & P, AFP, beta-hCG, LDH, and chest x-ray every 3 to 4 months for the first year, every 6 months for year 2, then annually. Pelvic CT scan is recommended annually for three years for patients who received only para-aortic radiation.
Seminoma stage IIA, IIB: H&P, AFP, beta-hCG, LDH, chest x-ray every 3 to 4 months for years 1 to 3, every 6 months for year 4, then annually. Abdominal CT scan is recommended at month 4 of year 1.
Seminoma stage IIC, III: H&P, chest x-ray, AFP, beta-hCG, and LDH every 2 months for year 1, every 3 months for year 2, every 4 months for year 3, every 6 months for year 4, then annually. Abdominal/pelvic CT at month 4 of year 1 status post surgery; otherwise, abdominal/pelvic CT every 3 month until stable. PET scan could be considered when clinically indicated.
Nonseminoma stage IA, IB: H&P, chest x-ray, AFP, beta-hHG, and LDH every 1-2 months for year 1, every 2 months for year 2, every 3 months for year 3, every 4 months for year 4, every 6 months for year 5, then annually. Abdominal/pelvic CT scan every 2-3 months for year 1, every 3-4 months for year 2, every 4 months for year 3, every 6 months for year 4, every 12 months for year 5, then annually.
Nonseminoma stage IIA, IIB, IIC, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC after complete response to chemotherapy and/or retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: H&P, chest x-ray, AFP, beta-hHG, and LDH every 2-3 months for year 1, every 2-3 months for year 2, every 4 months for year 3, every 4 months for year 4, every 6 months for year 5, then annually. Abdominal/pelvic CT scan every 6 months for year 1, every 6-12 months for year 2, every 12 months for year 3, every 12 months for year 4, every 12 months for year 5, then every 12-24 months.
Treatment-related toxicity
Pulmonary: Bleomycin can cause pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis; therefore, pulmonary function tests are done before starting chemotherapy that includes this agent. Bleomycin-induced lung toxicity is cumulative and although it can be fatal, it is rarely fatal if the total cumulative dose is less than 400 units. Patients with bleomycin-induced pneumonitis present with nonproductive cough, dyspnea on exertion, and bibasilar rales. Chest x-ray may show pulmonary nodules. A decline in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) is the earliest sign of lung toxicity; bleomycin should be discontinued if it occurs. Smokers should be counseled regarding smoking cessation.
Renal toxicity: 20-30% of patients who receive cisplatin have a reduction in glomerular filtration rate. Cisplatin can also cause hypomagnesemia, hypophosphatemia, and hypokalemia.
Cardiovascular: Cardiovascular disorders are late complications of cisplatin treatment. They include hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, thromboembolic events, and Raynaud phenomenon.
Infertility
Hematological: Anemia, leukopenia/neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia may occur. Prophylactic treatment with hematopoietic growth factors is recommended to avoid the need for dose attenuation or treatment delays.
Gastrointestinal: Nausea and vomiting.
Neurological: Cisplatin and oxaliplatin can cause neuropathy.
Ototoxicity: tinnitus and high-frequency sensorineural loss.
Secondary malignancy: Secondary malignancies are the most common cause of death in testicular cancer survivors. A second testicular cancer develops in 1% to 2% of testicular cancer survivors.
Solid tumors: A followup study of more than 40,000 testicular cancer survivors in Europe and North America showed that the relative risk of developing a secondary tumor was 1.9 (95% confidence index, 1.8 to 2.1) for 10 years and 1.7 for 35 years.14 Cancers of the lung, colon, bladder, pancreas, stomach, mesothelioma, and esophagus were found. Testicular cancer patients who were treated with radiation alone were at higher risk of having bladder, stomach, pancreas, and kidney cancers.
Leukemia: Patients treated with regimens that contain etoposide have an increased risk of developing leukemia, mainly of the myeloid lineage. In such cases, the Hallmark chromosomal translocation involving the long arm of chromosome 11 (11q23) occurs 2 to 3 years following treatment. Leukemia develops in 16 per 10,000 patients treated with standard-dose chemotherapy.
The International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC),7 an easily applicable, clinically based prognostic instrument, is now used in clinical practice for risk classification and is the current standard for all practice guidelines, including that of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
The IGCCC is based on a retrospective analysis of 5,202 patients with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) and 660 patients with metastatic seminomatous germ cell tumors from 10 countries, who were treated between 1975 and 1990. All patients received treatment with cisplatin- or carboplatin-containing therapy as their first chemotherapy course. Median followup was 5 years. For NSGCT, independent adverse factors were identified: mediastinal primary site; degree of elevation of alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); and presence of nonpulmonary visceral metastates (NPVM), such as liver, bone, and brain. For seminoma, the predominant adverse feature was the presence of NPVM.
The IGCCC distinguishes NSGCT patients with a good, intermediate, or poor prognosis; these have reported 5-year overall survival of 92%, 80%, and 48%, respectively.
A subsequent meta-analysis of survival of patients with NSGCT, treated after 1989 and classified according to the IGCC classification, included 10 papers describing 1775 patients with NSGCT with good (n = 1087), intermediate (n = 232), or poor (n = 456) prognosis. Pooled 5-year survival estimates were 94%, 83%, and 71%, respectively. There was a small increase in survival for good-prognosis and intermediate-prognosis patients, and a large increase in survival for patients with a poor prognosis. The researchers suggested that the improved survival was most likely due to both more effective treatment strategies and more experience in treating NSGCT patients.15
Good-prognosis nonseminoma (56% to 61% of nonseminomas): 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) is 89%; 5-year survival is 92% to 94%
Intermediate-prognosis nonseminoma (13-28% of nonseminomas): 5-year PFS is 75%; 5-year survival is 80% to 83%
Intermediate-prognosis seminoma (10% of seminomas): 5-year PFS is 67%; 5-year survival is 72%
Poor-prognosis nonseminoma (16%–26% of nonseminomas): 5-year PFS is 41%; 5-year survival is 71%
Poor-prognosis s eminoma: No seminoma patients are classified as poor prognosis.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/sites-types/testicular
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2009. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2009.
McGlynn KA, Devesa SS, Sigurdson AJ, Brown LM, Tsao L, Tarone RE. Trends in the incidence of testicular germ cell tumors in the United States. Cancer. Jan 1 2003;97(1):63-70. [Medline].
McGlynn KA, Devesa SS, Graubard BI, Castle PE. Increasing incidence of testicular germ cell tumors among black men in the United States. J Clin Oncol. Aug 20 2005;23(24):5757-61. [Medline].
Pettersson A, Richiardi L, Nordenskjold A, Kaijser M, Akre O. Age at surgery for undescended testis and risk of testicular cancer. N Engl J Med. May 3 2007;356(18):1835-41. [Medline].
Walsh TJ, Croughan MS, Schembri M, Chan JM, Turek PJ. Increased risk of testicular germ cell cancer among infertile men. Arch Intern Med. Feb 23 2009;169(4):351-6. [Medline].
American Joint Committee on Cancer. Testis. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th edition. New York: Springer Science Business Media LCC; 2006.
International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor- based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1997;15(2):594-603. [Medline].
Oliver RT, Mason MD, Mead GM, von der Maase H, Rustin GJ, Joffe JK. Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial. Lancet. Jul 23-29 2005;366(9482):293-300. [Medline].
Oliver RT, Mead GM, Fogarty PJ, Stenning SP, MRC TE19 and EORTC 30982 trial collaborators. Radiotherapy versus carboplatin for stage I seminoma: Updated analysis of the MRC/EORTC randomized trial (ISRCTN27163214). J Clin Oncol. May 20 2008;26 suppl:abstract 1. [Full Text].
De Santis M, Becherer A, Bokemeyer C, Stoiber F, Oechsle K, Sellner F. 2-18fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is a reliable predictor for viable tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma: an update of the prospective multicentric SEMPET trial. J Clin Oncol. Mar 15 2004;22(6):1034-9. [Medline].
Einhorn LH, Williams SD, Chamness A, Brames MJ, Perkins SM, Abonour R. High-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue for metastatic germ-cell tumors. N Engl J Med. Jul 26 2007;357(4):340-8. [Medline].
Pectasides D, Pectasides M, Farmakis D, Aravantinos G, Nikolaou M, Koumpou M. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors: a phase II study. Ann Oncol. Mar 2004;15(3):493-7. [Medline].
Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. Feb 26 2009;360(9):902-11. [Medline].
Travis LB, Fosså SD, Schonfeld SJ, McMaster ML, Lynch CF, Storm H. Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: focus on long-term survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. Sep 21 2005;97(18):1354-65. [Medline].
van Dijk MR, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD. Survival of non-seminomatous germ cell cancer patients according to the IGCC classification: An update based on meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. May 2006;42(7):820-6. [Medline].
Albers P. Surgery is an essential part of salvage treatment in refractory germ cell tumors. Eur Urol. Nov 2006;50(5):893-4. [Medline].
Albers P, Siener R, Krege S, Schmelz HU, Dieckmann KP, Heidenreich A. Randomized phase III trial comparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with one course of bleomycin and etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of clinical stage I Nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: AUO trial AH 01/94 by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. Jun 20 2008;26(18):2966-72. [Medline].
Albqami N, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in the management of clinical stage I and II testicular cancer. J Endourol. Jul-Aug 2005;19(6):683-92; discussion 692. [Medline].
Aparicio J, Germà JR, García del Muro X, Maroto P, Arranz JA, Sáenz A. Risk-adapted management for patients with clinical stage I seminoma: the Second Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group study. J Clin Oncol. Dec 1 2005;23(34):8717-23. [Medline].
Bajorin DF, Sarosdy MF, Pfister DG, et al. Randomized trial of etoposide and cisplatin versus etoposide and carboplatin in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors: a multiinstitutional study. J Clin Oncol. Apr 1993;11(4):598-606. [Medline].
Beck SD, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Cheng L, Donohue JP. Does the histology of nodal metastasis predict systemic relapse after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in pathological stage B1 germ cell tumors?. J Urol. Oct 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1287-90; discussion 1290. [Medline].
Beck SD, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Cheng L, Ulbright TM, Donohue JP. Impact of the number of positive lymph nodes on disease-free survival in patients with pathological stage B1 nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. J Urol. Jul 2005;174(1):143-5. [Medline].
Bedano PM, Brames MJ, Williams SD, Juliar BE, Einhorn LH. Phase II study of cisplatin plus epirubicin salvage chemotherapy in refractory germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. Dec 1 2006;24(34):5403-7. [Medline].
Beyer J, Kramar A, Mandanas R, Linkesch W, Greinix A, Droz JP. High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment in germ cell tumors: a multivariate analysis of prognostic variables. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1996;14(10):2638-45. [Medline].
Bokemeyer C. Bleomycin in testicular cancer: will pharmacogenomics improve treatment regimens?. J Clin Oncol. Apr 10 2008;26(11):1783-5. [Medline].
Bosl GJ, Chaganti RS. The use of tumor markers in germ cell malignancies. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. Jun 1994;8(3):573-87. [Medline].
Bosl GJ, Motzer RJ. Testicular germ-cell cancer. N Engl J Med. Jul 24 1997;337(4):242-53. [Medline].
Calvert AH, Newell DR, Gumbrell LA, O'Reilly S, Burnell M, Boxall FE. Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol. Nov 1989;7(11):1748-56. [Medline].
Chaganti RS, Houldsworth J. Genetics and biology of adult human male germ cell tumors. Cancer Res. Mar 15 2000;60(6):1475-82. [Medline].
Chaganti RS, Rodriguez E, Bosl GJ. Cytogenetics of male germ-cell tumors. Urol Clin North Am. Feb 1993;20(1):55-66. [Medline].
Chaganti RS, Rodriguez E, Mathew S. Origin of adult male mediastinal germ-cell tumours. Lancet. May 7 1994;343(8906):1130-2. [Medline].
Chung PW, Warde PR, Panzarella T, Bayley AJ, Catton CN, Milosevic MF. Appropriate radiation volume for stage IIA/B testicular seminoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jul 1 2003;56(3):746-8. [Medline].
Classen J, Schmidberger H, Meisner C, Souchon R, Sautter-Bihl ML, Sauer R. Radiotherapy for stages IIA/B testicular seminoma: final report of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. Mar 15 2003;21(6):1101-6. [Medline].
Classen J, Schmidberger H, Meisner C, Winkler C, Dunst J, Souchon R. Para-aortic irradiation for stage I testicular seminoma: results of a prospective study in 675 patients. A trial of the German testicular cancer study group (GTCSG). Br J Cancer. Jun 14 2004;90(12):2305-11. [Medline].
Corvin S, Sturm W, Schlatter E, Anastasiadis A, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection with the waterjet is technically feasible and safe in testis-cancer patient. J Endourol. Sep 2005;19(7):823-6. [Medline].
Culine S, Kramar A, Théodore C, Geoffrois L, Chevreau C, Biron P. Randomized trial comparing bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin with alternating cisplatin/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin and vinblastine/bleomycin regimens of chemotherapy for patients with intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: Genito-Urinary Group of the French Federation of Cancer Centers Trial T93MP. J Clin Oncol. Jan 20 2008;26(3):421-7. [Medline].
Daugaard G, Petersen PM, Rørth M. Surveillance in stage I testicular cancer. APMIS. Jan 2003;111(1):76-83; discussion 83-5. [Medline].
De Giorgi U, Rosti G, Aieta M, Testore F, Burattini L, Fornarini G. Phase II study of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine salvage chemotherapy in patients with cisplatin-refractory nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Eur Urol. Nov 2006;50(5):1032-8; discussion 1038-9. [Medline].
de Wit R. Optimal management of retroperitoneal metastatic nonseminomatous testicular cancer: toward a better selection between scalpel and needle. J Clin Oncol. Dec 10 2007;25(35):5550-2. [Medline].
de Wit R, Roberts JT, Wilkinson PM, de Mulder PH, Mead GM, Fosså SD. Equivalence of three or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy and of a 3- or 5-day schedule in good-prognosis germ cell cancer: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group and the Medical Research Council. J Clin Oncol. Mar 15 2001;19(6):1629-40. [Medline].
de Wit R, Stoter G, Kaye SB, et al. Importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis testicular nonseminoma: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. May 1997;15(5):1837-43. [Medline].
Donohue JP, Thornhill JA, Foster RS, et al. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage A non- seminomatous germ cell testis cancer. Review of the Indiana University experience 1965-1989. Br J Urol. Mar 1993;71(3):326-35. [Medline].
Einhorn LH. Role of the urologist in metastatic testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. Mar 20 2007;25(9):1024-5. [Medline].
Feldman DR, Bosl GJ, Sheinfeld J, Motzer RJ. Medical treatment of advanced testicular cancer. JAMA. Feb 13 2008;299(6):672-84. [Medline].
Gels ME, Hoekstra HJ, Sleijfer DT, et al. Detection of recurrence in patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors and consequences for further follow-up: a single-center 10-year experience. J Clin Oncol. May 1995;13(5):1188-94. [Medline].
Haugnes HS, Aass N, Fosså SD, Dahl O, Brydøy M, Aasebø U. Pulmonary function in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. Jun 10 2009;27(17):2779-86. [Medline].
Hinton S, Catalano PJ, Einhorn LH, Nichols CR, David Crawford E, Vogelzang N. Cisplatin, etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in the treatment of disseminated germ cell tumors: final analysis of an intergroup trial. Cancer. Apr 15 2003;97(8):1869-75. [Medline].
Holm M, Hoei-Hansen CE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE. Increased risk of carcinoma in situ in patients with testicular germ cell cancer with ultrasonic microlithiasis in the contralateral testicle. J Urol. Oct 2003;170(4 Pt 1):1163-7. [Medline].
Horvath A, Korde L, Greene MH, Libe R, Osorio P, Faucz FR, et al. Functional phosphodiesterase 11A mutations may modify the risk of familial and bilateral testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer Res. Jul 1 2009;69(13):5301-6. [Medline].
Houck W, Abonour R, Vance G, Einhorn LH. Secondary leukemias in refractory germ cell tumor patients undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation using high-dose etoposide. J Clin Oncol. Jun 1 2004;22(11):2155-8. [Medline].
Huyghe E, Matsuda T, Thonneau P. Increasing incidence of testicular cancer worldwide: a review. J Urol. Jul 2003;170(1):5-11. [Medline].
Jones WG, Fossa SD, Mead GM, Roberts JT, Sokal M, Horwich A. Randomized trial of 30 versus 20 Gy in the adjuvant treatment of stage I Testicular Seminoma: a report on Medical Research Council Trial TE18, European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 30942 (ISRCTN18525328). J Clin Oncol. Feb 20 2005;23(6):1200-8. [Medline].
Kollmannsberger C, Beyer J, Liersch R, Schoeffski P, Metzner B, Hartmann JT. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with intensively pretreated or refractory germ cell cancer: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1 2004;22(1):108-14. [Medline].
Kollmannsberger C, Beyer J, Liersch R, Schoeffski P, Metzner B, Hartmann JT. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with intensively pretreated or refractory germ cell cancer: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1 2004;22(1):108-14. [Medline].
Kondagunta GV, Bacik J, Bajorin D, Dobrzynski D, Sheinfeld J, Motzer RJ. Etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic good-risk germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. Dec 20 2005;23(36):9290-4. [Medline].
Kondagunta GV, Bacik J, Donadio A, Bajorin D, Marion S, Sheinfeld J. Combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin is an effective second-line therapy for patients with relapsed testicular germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. Sep 20 2005;23(27):6549-55. [Medline].
Loehrer PJ Sr, Bosl GJ. Carboplatin for stage I seminoma and the sword of Damocles. J Clin Oncol. Dec 1 2005;23(34):8566-9. [Medline].
Loehrer PJ Sr, Gonin R, Nichols CR, Weathers T, Einhorn LH. Vinblastine plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin as initial salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell tumor. J Clin Oncol. Jul 1998;16(7):2500-4. [Medline].
Loehrer PJ Sr, Johnson D, Elson P, et al. Importance of bleomycin in favorable-prognosis disseminated germ cell tumors: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1995;13(2):470-6. [Medline].
Loehrer PJ Sr, Lauer R, Roth BJ, Williams SD, Kalasinski LA, Einhorn LH. Salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell cancer: ifosfamide and cisplatin plus either vinblastine or etoposide. Ann Intern Med. Oct 1 1988;109(7):540-6. [Medline].
Melchior D, Müller SC, Albers P. Extensive surgery in metastatic testicular cancer. Aktuelle Urol. Jul 2003;34(4):214-22. [Medline].
Motzer RJ, Agarwal N, Beard C, Bolger GB, Boston B, Carducci MA, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Testicular Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. Jun 2009;7(6):672-93. [Medline].
Motzer RJ, Rodriguez E, Reuter VE, et al. Molecular and cytogenetic studies in the diagnosis of patients with poorly differentiated carcinomas of unknown primary site. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1995;13(1):274-82. [Medline].
Motzer RJ, Sheinfeld J, Mazumdar M, et al. Etoposide and cisplatin adjuvant therapy for patients with pathologic stage II germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. Nov 1995;13(11):2700-4. [Medline].
Moynihan C, Norman AR, Barbachano Y, Burchell L, Huddart R, Dearnaley DP. Prospective study of factors predicting adherence to medical advice in men with testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. May 1 2009;27(13):2144-50. [Medline].
Nichols CR, Catalano PJ, Crawford ED, Vogelzang NJ, Einhorn LH, Loehrer PJ. Randomized comparison of cisplatin and etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in treatment of advanced disseminated germ cell tumors: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Southwest Oncology Group, and Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol. Apr 1998;16(4):1287-93. [Medline].
R. T. Oliver, G. M. Mead, P. J. Fogarty, S. P. Stenning, MRC TE19 and EORTC 30982 trial collaborators. Radiotherapy versus carboplatin for stage I seminoma: Updated analysis of the MRC/EORTC randomized trial (ISRCTN27163214). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:(May 20 suppl; abstr 1).
Rick O, Bokemeyer C, Weinknecht S, Schirren J, Pottek T, Hartmann JT. Residual tumor resection after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell cancer. J Clin Oncol. Sep 15 2004;22(18):3713-9. [Medline].
Saxman SB, Finch D, Gonin R, Einhorn LH. Long-term follow-up of a phase III study of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in favorable-prognosis germ-cell tumors: the Indian University experience. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1998;16(2):702-6. [Medline].
Saxman SB, Nichols CR, Foster RS, et al. The management of patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumors and persistently elevated serologic markers. J Urol. Feb 1996;155(2):587-9. [Medline].
Shamash J, Stebbing J, Powles T. Germ-cell tumors. N Engl J Med. Oct 25 2007;357(17):1771-2; author reply 1773-4. [Medline].
Sheinfeld J, Motzer RJ. Stage I testicular cancer management and necessity for surgical expertise. J Clin Oncol. Jun 20 2008;26(18):2934-6. [Medline].
Tandstad T, Dahl O, Cohn-Cedermark G, Cavallin-Stahl E, Stierner U, Solberg A. Risk-adapted treatment in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: the SWENOTECA management program. J Clin Oncol. May 1 2009;27(13):2122-8. [Medline].
Thuret R, Cariou G, Aerts J, Cochand-Priollet B. Testicular sarcoidosis with elevated levels of cancer-associated markers. J Clin Oncol. Dec 20 2008;26(36):6007-8. [Medline].
Toner GC, Motzer RJ. Poor prognosis germ cell tumors: current status and future directions. Semin Oncol. Apr 1998;25(2):194-202. [Medline].
van Leeuwen FE, Stiggelbout AM, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, et al. Second cancer risk following testicular cancer: a follow-up study of 1,909 patients. J Clin Oncol. Mar 1993;11(3):415-24. [Medline].
Williams SD, Birch R, Einhorn LH, Irwin L, Greco FA, Loehrer PJ. Treatment of disseminated germ-cell tumors with cisplatin, bleomycin, and either vinblastine or etoposide. N Engl J Med. Jun 4 1987;316(23):1435-40. [Medline].
Xiao H, Mazumdar M, Bajorin DF, Sarosdy M, Vlamis V, Spicer J. Long-term follow-up of patients with good-risk germ cell tumors treated with etoposide and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. Jul 1997;15(7):2553-8. [Medline].
Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Lee AK, Strom SS. Mortality after cure of testicular seminoma. J Clin Oncol. Feb 15 2004;22(4):640-7. [Medline].
testicular cancer symptoms, testicular cancer diagnosis, testicular cancer treatment, germ cell tumors, GCT, seminoma, embryonal carcinoma, teratoma, choriocarcinoma, yolk sac tumor
Kush Sachdeva, MD, Southern Oncology and Hematology Associates, South Jersey Healthcare, Fox Chase Cancer Center Partner
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Mansoor Javeed, MD, FACP, Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of California Davis; Consultant, Sierra Hematology-Oncology Medical Center
Mansoor Javeed, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians and Pennsylvania Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Issam Makhoul, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Issam Makhoul, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Brendan Curti, MD, Director, Genitourinary Oncology Research, Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Center
Brendan Curti, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Oregon Medical Association, and Society for Biological Therapy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Philip Schulman, MD, Chief, Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine
Philip Schulman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Physicians, American Society of Hematology, and Medical Society of the State of New York
Disclosure: celgene Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Amgen Honoraria Speaking and teaching; genetech/idec Honoraria Speaking and teaching
Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment
Rajalaxmi McKenna, MD, FACP, Southwest Medical Consultants, SC, Department of Medicine, Good Samaritan Hospital, Advocate Health Systems
Rajalaxmi McKenna, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Jules E Harris, MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine at Tucson; Consulting Staff, Arizona Cancer Center
Jules E Harris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Immunologists, American Society of Hematology, and Central Society for Clinical Research
Disclosure: GlobeImmune Salary Consulting; Amplimed Consulting fee Consulting; FibroGen Consulting fee Consulting
The author and editors wish to thank Salah Almokadem, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center; and Charles J Ryan, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, for their contributions to previous versions of this article.
© 1994-
by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)