Overview
The overall incidence of cutaneous melanoma (skin cancer) is increasing faster than that of any other neoplasm. In fact, melanoma is the most frequent cancer in white women aged 25-29 years and the second most frequent (after breast cancer) in white women aged 24-30 years with fair skin. In 2006 and 2007, approximately 60,000-62,000 new cases of invasive skin melanoma and more than 48,000 in situ melanomas were diagnosed.[1, 2]
Lentigo maligna (LM) is a subtype of melanoma in situ, and it has a slight female preponderance. Lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) is 1 of the 4 main subtypes of invasive melanoma and represents 5-15% of cases. The other types are superficial spreading (70%), nodular (10-15%), and acral lentiginous melanoma (5%).[3]
Lentigo maligna melanoma is most often found in the head and neck. Approximately 10-30% of all cutaneous melanoma arise in this region.
Sir John Hutchinson first described lentigo maligna in 1890; the disease continues to be called Hutchinson melanotic freckle on occasion. The Hutchinson melanotic freckle was originally thought to be infectious because of its slow yet progressive growth. The lesion has subsequently been characterized as malignant lentigo of elderly people, junctional nevus, and melanoma in situ. Most authors currently refer to it as lentigo maligna when it is confined to the epidermis and lentigo maligna melanoma when it violates the dermis.
For more information, see the following
Etiology and Pathophysiology
Risk factors for lentigo maligna melanoma include the following:
- Ultraviolet radiation exposure: For people who live in Australia, the risk increases as the number of years spent in Australia increases, as well as with increased hours of exposure to sunlight, with the amount of actinic damage, and with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer.
- Increased number of melanocytic nevi, including large or giant congenital nevi
- Fair skin
- History of severe sunburn
- Occupational risk
Many authors consider lentigo maligna to be a preinvasive lesion induced by long-term cumulative ultraviolet injury. Conceptually, the term melanoma is used when atypical melanocytes invade the rich vascular and lymphatic networks of the dermis, thereby establishing metastatic potential.
Most malignant melanomas arise as superficial tumors confined to the epidermis, which is often known as horizontal growth. At some point, a stepwise accumulation of genetic abnormalities leads to proliferation and progression to the vertical growth phase, which leads to dermal and deeper involvement and, subsequently, nodal metastases.
About 10% of melanomas are familial. A first-degree relative has an 8-12 times increased risk of melanoma. The major gene resides on chromosome arm 9p and encodes a tumor suppressor gene called CDKN2A or MTS1.[4] The second gene that has been noted in melanoma prone families is CDK4, and germline mutations have been identified in this group.
Epidemiology
In 2008, for all types of melanoma, in the United States, the American Cancer Society (ACS) projected that 62,480 new cases (34,950 male and 27,530 female) would be diagnosed.[5] Contrast those numbers with the 2010 data[6] : an estimated total of 68,130 new cases (38,870 male and 29,260 female). The 2008 estimated deaths attributable to melanoma were 8,420 (5,400 male and 3,020 female),[5] whereas the 2010 estimated deaths from melanoma was 8,700 (5,670 male and 3,030 female).[6]
The incidence of lentigo maligna is greatest in Hawaii, intermediate in the central and southern states, and lowest in the northern states. The incidence of melanoma is highest in Australia, where lentigo maligna accounts for 10-15% of all melanomas.[7]
Patients with lentigo maligna tend to be older than those with superficial spreading malignant melanoma or nodular melanoma. Generally, patients with lentigo maligna are older than 40 years, with a mean age of 65 years. The peak incidence occurs in the seventh to eighth decades of life.
Lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma are associated with higher occupational exposure and lower recreational sun exposure.
Clinical Evaluation
As mentioned earlier, the risk of lentigo maligna melanoma increases as the number of years of residence in sunnier climates (eg, southern United States) increases, and the risk increases with increased hours of exposure to sunlight,[8] increased amount of actinic damage, and a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Therefore, it is important to elicit this information from the patient. In addition, associations have been reported between lentigo maligna melanoma and the following:
- Light skin color (especially people who have red hair)
- History of severe sunburn
- Werner syndrome
- Tyrosine-positive oculocutaneous albinism
A strong correlation exists between patients who report finding a nodule and diagnosis of melanoma. Although palpability usually indicates dermal invasion, clinical examination may be unreliable in early invasive lentigo maligna melanoma (lesions < 1 mm).
Lentigo maligna can be present for long periods (5-15 y) before invasion occurs, although rapid progression within months has been described. The percentage of lentigo maligna that progress to lentigo maligna melanoma remains unknown, but estimates of the lifetime risk of developing lentigo maligna melanoma in patients diagnosed with lentigo maligna at age 45 years appears to be 5%. The risk for progression to lentigo maligna melanoma appears to be proportional to the size of the lesion of lentigo maligna.[9]
Suspect the possibility of melanoma if a patient reports a new pigmented lesion or changes in an existing mole. About 50% of melanomas can arise from normal skin with no preexisting lesions. The review of systems should focus on symptoms pertaining to metastatic disease. Melanoma usually metastasizes to lungs, liver, and brain.
Physical assessment
Patients with melanoma need a complete and thorough physical examination, especially with focus on the skin and lymph nodes.
The most frequent findings that suggest early melanoma are changes in size or color of a new pigmented lesion or an existing mole. Lentigo maligna most commonly affects the sun-exposed skin of the head and neck, with a predilection for the nose and cheek. In fact, in Australia, the lesions occur more commonly on the right side (driver's side) of the head and neck in men and on the left side (passenger's side) in women. According to the Australian road traffic database, most Australian drivers are men, and most passengers in the front seat are women.
Less common sites of involvement include the arm, leg, and trunk. The conjunctivae and oral mucosa may become involved when a cutaneous lentigo maligna spreads onto mucosal surfaces. Signs suggestive of a more locally advanced lesion include elevation, burning, itching, pain, or bleeding.
The simple ABCDE rule of melanoma, as follows, helps patients as well as physicians to suspect and make an early diagnosis.
- A – Asymmetry
- B – Border irregularity
- C – Color variegation
- D – Diameter greater than 6 mm (tip of pencil head), although melanoma can occur in lesions less than 6 mm
- E – Enlargement
Lentigo maligna, the precursor lesion, has been likened to a stain on the skin. The lesion is typically tan-brown, with differing shades throughout.
Assess the total number of all types of moles. More than 50 nevi 2 mm in diameter or larger indicate an increased risk for melanoma.
Search for dysplastic (clinically atypical) melanocytic nevi. Irregular pigment patterns, such as variegation, central dark areas, or halos of pigment, may indicate the presence of dysplasia. Atypical nevi tend to be larger than common acquired neomelanocytic nevi, which rarely exceed 5 mm.
Search for congenital melanocytic nevi. People with very large or giant congenital nevi have an increased lifetime risk (>6%) of developing melanoma. Intermediate sized (>0.5 cm), raised, pigmented lesions, with or without hair, that do not have the features of clinically atypical nevi have an uncertain but elevated risk for development of melanoma.
Diagnostic Considerations
Distinguishing lentigo maligna from its invasive counterpart on a clinical basis continues to present diagnostic dilemmas, especially in patients who had previous therapeutic interventions like cryotherapy. It is important to have a low threshold for biopsy of pigmented facial lesions. In a series of 85 excised lesions with a clinical diagnosis of lentigo maligna, more than 50% had invasive lentigo maligna melanoma.
The following conditions should also be considered when evaluating a patient for suspected lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma:
- Common acquired nevi
- Dysplastic nevi
- Pigmented actinic keratosis
- Seborrheic keratosis
- Solar lentigo
Diagnostic Evaluation
Patients with low-risk melanomas, less than 1 mm thick, do not routinely need laboratory studies. However, most centers order liver function tests and lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) as part of the initial laboratory evaluation. Serum LDH is used as part of metastasis staging (see Staging).
Imaging Studies
Most institutions obtain chest radiographs in patients with low-risk disease.
To determine the extent of disease, positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, staging computed tomography (CT) scanning, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be performed for patients with node-positive disease or those with symptoms suggestive of metastasis.
Dermoscopy
Dermoscopy is a tool that helps the dermatologist distinguish benign from malignant lesions.[10] It is a hand-held instrument that magnifies the skin lesion 10 times to enable a more accurate diagnosis.
Skin Biopsy
Ideally, biopsy of lesions should include full-thickness skin extending to the subcutaneous fat.
Avoid superficial skin biopsy by shaving, scissors excision, or curettage, because these techniques do not allow for assessment of tumor thickness, which is important for prognostication and treatment planning (see Staging).
A better biopsy choice would be excisional biopsy with a narrow margin of normal-appearing skin, which can usually be performed on lesions, unless the result would be disfiguring, in which case incisional biopsy is considered reasonable. Incisional biopsy is also indicated for lesions that are too large for complete excision.
The type of biopsy does not influence patient survival or rate of metastasis. Previous concerns that incision into a melanoma promotes its dissemination have been allayed. The excisional biopsy specimen may be obtained by elliptical excision, saucerization, or punch biopsy, if the lesion is small enough. The specimen should include a portion of subcutaneous fat to ensure that accurate microstaging can be determined.
Lymph Node Biopsy
Sentinel lymph node biopsy is done to assess regional lymph node involvement and to decide on adjuvant therapy. This technique is indicated in all melanoma patients except those with stage 0 or stage 1A disease, that is, patients with a lesion less than 1 mm (see Staging).
If metastasis is present, a full nodal dissection is done to fully stage the disease.
Staging
Lentigo maligna is melanoma in situ; lentigo maligna melanoma is melanoma.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor, Node, Metastases (TNM) staging for melanoma uses tumor size, rather than invasion, and ulceration and number of mitoses per mm2 to stage the tumor.[11]
Tumor staging is as follows. For the stages below, the addition of “a” indicates without ulceration and of “b” indicates with ulceration, except for “T1a,” which indicates without ulceration and mitosis less than 1/mm2 and “T1b,” which indicates with ulceration or mitoses 1 or more per mm2[11] :
- Tx – Primary tumor cannot be assessed (eg, regressed primary).
- T0 – No evidence of primary tumor
- Tis – Melanoma in situ
- T1 – 1 mm or less in thickness; T1a; T1b
- T2 – 1.01-2.0 mm; T2a; T2b
- T3 – 2.01-4.0 mm; T3a; T3b
- T4 – Larger than 4.0 mm; T4a; T4b
Regional nodal staging is as follows. For the stages below, the addition of “a” indicates micrometastasis clinically occult, of “b” indicates macrometastasis clinically apparent, and of “c” indicates in transit metastasis(es)/satellite(s) without metastatic nodes[11] :
- Nx – Nodes cannot be assessed (eg, previously removed).
- N0 – No regional metastases detected.
- N1 – 1 metastatic node; N1a; N1b
- N2 - 2-3 metastatic nodes; N2a; N2b; N2c
- N3 - 4 or more metastatic nodes, or matted nodes, or in transit metastasis(es)/satellite(s) with metastatic nodes.
M indicates distant metastasis and is staged incorporating serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels as follows[11] :
- M0 – No detectable evidence of distant metastases
- M1a – Metastases to skin, subcutaneous, or distant lymph nodes, normal LDH level
- M1b – Metastases to lung, normal LDH level
- M1c – Metastases to all other visceral sites with normal LDH level or distant metastases to any site combined with an elevated serum LDH level
Management Overview
Melanoma should be managed by a multidisciplinary team that includes a dermatologist, surgeon, and medical oncologist, as well as other allied health professionals.
Lentigo maligna is treated with surgery. However, various nonsurgical modalities are available to patients in whom surgical therapy is not feasible, including cryotherapy and immune response therapy with topical imiquimod.
Radiotherapy in the treatment of lentigo maligna was first described by Miescher in 1954. Other investigators have employed similar techniques with varying results. A primary risk of using radiation therapy for lentigo maligna is that it may miss focal lentigo maligna melanoma.
In the presence of nodal disease, multiple chemotherapy and immunotherapy drugs have been tested. High-dose alpha-interferon remains the standard adjuvant option, especially with stage III cancer, in which it results in a 9-month increase in disease-free survival and a 1-year increase in overall survival. In the presence of metastases, the options include high-dose interleukin-2, dacarbazine, and temozolomide.
Vaccines have been tested in various studies, but none have led to any significant survival advantage. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been found to prolong time to progression compared to historical control in both node-positive and metastatic stage of the disease.
Nonsurgical therapies have a recurrence rate of 20-100% at 5 years.
Special considerations
Potential medicolegal pitfalls include the following:
- Failure to diagnose, which is often the case with skin lesions that were initially thought to be benign without a biopsy
- Failure to provide adequate follow-up care
Cryotherapy
Cryotherapy is not standard for the management of lentigo maligna, but it is often used in patients who are not candidates for surgery. Temperatures of -4°C (24.8°F) to -7°C (19.4°F) selectively destroy melanocytes while preserving keratinocytes in skin and mucosal epithelia.
Most authors discourage using cryotherapy for lentigo maligna, because focal lentigo maligna melanoma cannot be detected clinically. In addition, the risks of cryotherapy include hypopigmentation, infection, scarring, inability to detect invasive melanoma, and failure to treat periadnexal involvement.
The first report of cryotherapy for lentigo maligna was published in 1975.
Topical Imiquimod Therapy
Topical imiquimod 5% cream has been described in many studies to be effective in treating lentigo maligna, especially in patients who are not surgical candidates. Imiquimod is an immune response modifier that offers encouraging results, but further studies are needed to identify ideal treatment protocols.
In an open-label study of 34 primary lesions in 32 patients using imiquimod, Buettiker et al reported that all lesions were completely cleared.[12] The median time of imiquimod application once or twice a day was 7 weeks. Only 1 lesion recurred after 30 months, and this was successfully retreated with imiquimod.[12]
Surgical Intervention
Lentigo maligna is treated with definitive surgical therapy. The actual margins of atypia usually extend beyond the clinically apparent margin; total removal may be difficult. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) practice guidelines for melanoma in 2010 are as follows (tumor thickness, recommended clinical margin)[13] :
- Tumor in situ – Margin size 0.5 cm
- Tumor smaller than 1 mm – Margin size 1 cm
- Tumor 1-2 mm – Margin size 1-2 cm
- Tumor 2-4 mm – Margin size 2 cm
- Tumor greater than 4 mm – Margin size at least 2 cm
However, a study by Agarwal and colleagues suggested that 5-mm margins are not sufficient in lentigo maligna, given that only 42% of tumors were cleared after a 5-mm excision in their study.[14]
Surgical Outcomes
Standard excisions have a recurrence rate of 8-20%. Mohs surgery and staged excision may offer better control and lower recurrence rates (4-5%).[15, 16, 17, 18]
Surgical excision with 5-mm margin is often inadequate for lentigo maligna on sun-damaged skin where a background of melanocytic hyperplasia obscures the true borders of the lesion. The cure rate is 80-94%, but staged margin excisions using frozen, or permanent sections, consistently provided much higher cure rates.[19]
In a review of using staged excision as treatment of lentigo maligna, this technique provides a long disease-free survival of 95% with follow-up of 57 months.[17] The technique included vertical excision with initial 2- to 3-mm margins examining permanent section within 24 hours. Further excisions took place as guided by the histologic findings.[17]
Hazan et al studied staged excision of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma in the head and neck region of 117 cases and reported the mean total surgical margin for excision of lentigo maligna was 7.1 mm and 10.3 mm for lentigo maligna melanoma.[20]
Outpatient Follow-up
Follow-up consists of examination of the skin, the primary site, and the regional nodal basin.
The National Cancer Institute recommends follow-up every 6 months for the first 2 years after surgical therapy in patients without atypical moles and without a family history of melanoma. If the patient is disease-free at 2 years, conduct yearly follow-up visits.
For patients with atypical moles or a positive family history, follow up every 3-6 months.
Base the decision to extend the interval after 2 years on the stability and characteristics of the atypical moles.
Patient education
Education also plays an integral role in the follow-up care of patients with melanoma.
Instruct patients on self-examination for new and locoregional recurrences. Teach them to recognize the classic characteristics of cutaneous melanoma in friends and family. In addition, during every follow-up visit, strongly counsel patients to avoid excess sun exposure, to use sunblock liberally, and to wear protective clothing.
For patient education information, see Cancer and Tumors Center, as well as Skin Cancer and Skin Biopsy.
Prognosis and Prognostic Factors
Melanoma is second only to adult leukemia in years of potential life lost in young adults. The disease is responsible for death in a disproportionately high number of young and middle-aged adults.[21] Lentigo maligna melanoma has a mortality rate similar to that of other melanoma types if depth of the tumor is taken into account.[22]
The overall prognosis is good for patients with localized melanoma and no nodal or distant metastases. An overall 5-year survival rate of 79% has been reported for patients with stage I or stage II lesions.
In patients with regional nodal disease (ie, stage III), the 3 dominant prognostic variables are the number of nodal metastases, the patient's age, and ulceration in the primary tumor (see Staging).
Numerous studies have shown that the number of nodes with metastases has significant prognostic value in patients with stage III disease. Patients with 1 positive node fared the best; 40% remained alive at 10 years. Those with 2-4 positive nodes had an intermediate 10-year survival rate of 26%. Patients with 5 or more positive nodes had the lowest 10-year survival rate, at 15%.
In both men and women with stage III melanoma, patients older than 50 years tend to do worse. In studies evaluating tumor ulceration as a prognostic factor in lentigo maligna melanoma, the 3-year survival rate for patients with an ulcerated primary tumor was 20%, compared with 35% for those with nonulcerated primary lesions.
Patients with stage IV melanoma generally have a poor prognosis. From the time the metastasis is diagnosed, the median survival is 6-7.5 months, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 6%.
Patients with neck and scalp melanoma have shorter survival compared with melanoma at other sites (extremities, face, trunk).[23] In an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data, patients with scalp and neck had a 1.84 risk of dying compared with patients affected at other sites such as extremity melanoma. The 5- and 10-year Kaplan Meier survival probabilities for scalp and neck melanoma were 83.1% and 76.2%, respectively, compared with melanoma of other sites at 92.1% and 88.7%, respectively.[23]
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2006;56(2):106-30. [Medline].
Rigual NR, Popat SR, Jayaprakash V, Jaggernauth W, Wong M. Cutaneous head and neck melanoma: the old and the new. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. Mar 2008;8(3):403-12. [Medline].
Liu V, Mihm MC. Pathology of malignant melanoma. Surg Clin North Am. Feb 2003;83(1):31-60, v. [Medline].
Goldstein AM, Dracopoli NC, Engelstein M, Fraser MC, Clark WH Jr, Tucker MA. Linkage of cutaneous malignant melanoma/dysplastic nevi to chromosome 9p, and evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet. Mar 1994;54(3):489-96. [Medline]. [Full Text].
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures: 2008. Accessed March 1, 2011. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-figures-2008.
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures: 2010. Accessed March 1, 2011. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-and-figures-2010.
New Zealand Guidelines Group, Australian Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Melanoma in Australia and New Zealand. Accessed March 1, 2011. Available at http://www.nzgg.org.nz/guidelines/dsp_guideline_popup.cfm?guidelineCatID=7&guidelineID=141.
Holman CD, Armstrong BK. Cutaneous malignant melanoma and indicators of total accumulated exposure to the sun: an analysis separating histogenetic types. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jul 1984;73(1):75-82. [Medline].
Weinstock MA, Sober AJ. The risk of progression of lentigo maligna to lentigo maligna melanoma. Br J Dermatol. Mar 1987;116(3):303-10. [Medline].
Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Vogt T, Landthaler M, Wlotzke U, Cognetta AB, et al. Improvement of early recognition of lentigo maligna using dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 2000;42(1 Pt 1):25-32. [Medline].
American Joint Committee on Cancer. Clinical cancer staging poster: Melanoma of the skin staging. 7th ed. Accessed March 1, 2011. Available at http://www.cancerstaging.org/staging/index.html.
Buettiker UV, Yawalkar NY, Braathen LR, Hunger RE. Imiquimod treatment of lentigo maligna: an open-label study of 34 primary lesions in 32 patients. Arch Dermatol. Jul 2008;144(7):943-5. [Medline].
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Practice Guidelines for Patients: Melanoma. v 2010. Fort Washington, Pa: NCCN. Publication no. MEL-0030-1210. Accessed March 1, 2011. Available at http://www.nccn.com/patient-guidelines.html.
Agarwal-Antal N, Bowen GM, Gerwels JW. Histologic evaluation of lentigo maligna with permanent sections: implications regarding current guidelines. J Am Acad Dermatol. Nov 2002;47(5):743-8. [Medline].
Stevenson O, Ahmed I. Lentigo maligna : prognosis and treatment options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6(3):151-64. [Medline].
McKenna JK, Florell SR, Goldman GD, Bowen GM. Lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma: current state of diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2006;32(4):493-504. [Medline].
Bub JL, Berg D, Slee A, Odland PB. Management of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma with staged excision: a 5-year follow-up. Arch Dermatol. May 2004;140(5):552-8. [Medline].
Gross EA, Andersen WK, Rogers GS. Mohs micrographic excision of lentigo maligna using Mel-5 for margin control. Arch Dermatol. Jan 1999;135(1):15-7. [Medline].
Clark GS, Pappas-Politis EC, Cherpelis BS, Messina JL, Möller MG, Cruse CW, et al. Surgical management of melanoma in situ on chronically sun-damaged skin. Cancer Control. Jul 2008;15(3):216-24. [Medline].
Hazan C, Dusza SW, Delgado R, Busam KJ, Halpern AC, Nehal KS. Staged excision for lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma: A retrospective analysis of 117 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 2008;58(1):142-8. [Medline].
Albert VA, Koh HK, Geller AC, Miller DR, Prout MN, Lew RA. Years of potential life lost: another indicator of the impact of cutaneous malignant melanoma on society. J Am Acad Dermatol. Aug 1990;23(2 Pt 1):308-10. [Medline].
Koh HK, Michalik E, Sober AJ, et al. Lentigo maligna melanoma has no better prognosis than other types of melanoma. J Clin Oncol. Sep 1984;2(9):994-1001. [Full Text].
Lachiewicz AM, Berwick M, Wiggins CL, Thomas NE. Survival differences between patients with scalp or neck melanoma and those with melanoma of other sites in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Arch Dermatol. Apr 2008;144(4):515-21. [Medline].
Holman CD, Mulroney CD, Armstrong BK. Epidemiology of pre-invasive and invasive malignant melanoma in Western Australia. Int J Cancer. Mar 15 1980;25(3):317-23. [Full Text].

