Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Workup

  • Author: Winston W Tan, MD; Chief Editor: Jules E Harris, MD   more...
 
Updated: Apr 12, 2012
 

Approach Considerations

Apart from a handful of asymptomatic patients in whom lung cancer is diagnosed incidentally, virtually all patients with lung cancer are symptomatic at presentation. In a patient with a long history of smoking or other risk factors for lung cancer, the presence of persistent respiratory symptoms should prompt a chest radiograph.

Because benign conditions and metastatic malignancies can mimic lung cancer on radiographs, histologic confirmation is necessary. This can be achieved by sputum cytologic studies, bronchoscopy, or computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of the mass, depending on the location of the tumor (see the image below).

Non–small cell lung cancer. Diagnostic approach foNon–small cell lung cancer. Diagnostic approach for possible lung cancer.

Staging workup

Because of the importance of stage on the therapeutic decision-making process, all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) must be staged adequately. A complete staging workup for NSCLC should be carried out to evaluate the extent of disease.

In the United States, the standard staging workup for NSCLC includes 7 main components (see the table below).

Staging workup for non–small cell lung cancer. Staging workup for non–small cell lung cancer.

Information obtained from these tests can then be used to guide further testing (eg, imaging studies).

Invasive staging procedures such as mediastinoscopy and mediastinotomy may be required to assess mediastinal lymph nodes in patients who are candidates for potentially curative surgical resection. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans may be useful in the detection of involved nodes, the presence of which may influence decisions about operability.

A study by Annema et al determined that among patients with suspected NSCLC, a combination of endosonography and surgical staging had a greater sensitivity for mediastinal nodal metastases than surgical staging alone.[30] This resulted in fewer unnecessary thoracotomies.

Although TNM staging is the best prognostic factor for NSCLC, a study by Hofman et al examined the prognostic potential of preoperative detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs).[31] The study used cytologic analysis after the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells (ISET method). The results showed that the presence and level of 50 or more circulating nonhematologic cells (CNHC) were associated with worse survival among patients with resectable NSCLC. Although CTCs are potentially interesting, the significance of their presence is still being debated.[32]

A retrospective Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis found that the number of positive lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor of survival in patients with N1 NSCLC.[33]

Next

Lab Studies

For staging purposes, a complete blood count (CBC) should be obtained in every patient, especially before instituting chemotherapy.

In an emergency setting, a CBC is not helpful in the initial evaluation. Obtain a CBC in patients with widely metastatic disease to aid in determining if an infiltrate is potentially infectious. Obtain a CBC in patients with fever with recent history of chemotherapy to check for neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1000).

Because of the propensity of lung cancers to cause paraneoplastic syndromes, serum electrolyte levels should be evaluated. Numerous paraneoplastic syndromes are commonly associated with lung cancer (see the table below).

Non–small cell lung cancer. Symptoms and signs of Non–small cell lung cancer. Symptoms and signs of lung cancer.

In an emergency setting, tests for electrolyte, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, calcium, and magnesium levels are not helpful, except when specific paraneoplastic syndromes (eg, hypercalcemia, Cushing syndrome, or syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion [SIADH]) must be considered.

Serum levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) or parathyroid hormone–related peptide (PTH-rP) can be obtained and checked.

Liver function tests (aspirate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT], prothrombin time [PT]/international normalized ratio [INR]) and alkaline phosphatase level are usually not helpful initially, but elevated results may be an indication of hepatic metastasis and bone metastasis, respectively.

Arterial blood gas (ABG) levels are useful in the detection of respiratory failure (eg, acidosis, hypercarbia, hypoxia) in sick patients. Obtain ABG levels in patients with active systemic diseases or abnormal labored breathing.

Previous
Next

Electrocardiography

An electrocardiogram (ECG) is helpful in establishing baseline findings and differentiating clinical symptoms (eg, chest pain, dyspnea). Changing lung hemodynamics often alters ECG wave patterns.

Previous
Next

Spirometry

Bedside tests for peak expiratory flow provide good indicators of significant airflow obstruction. Lung cancer is more closely linked to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with airflow compromise than to the disease without significant airway obstruction.

Previous
Next

Chest Radiography

A chest radiograph is usually the first test ordered in patients in whom a lung malignancy is suggested. If the tumor is clearly visible and measurable, chest radiography can sometimes be used to monitor response to therapy.

Chest radiographs may show the following:

  • Pulmonary nodule, mass, or infiltrate (see the first image below)
  • Mediastinal widening
  • Atelectasis
  • Hilar enlargement
  • Pleural effusion (see the second image below)Non–small cell lung cancer. Bronchoscopy. A large Non–small cell lung cancer. Bronchoscopy. A large central lesion was diagnosed as non–small cell carcinoma. Non–small cell lung cancer. Left pleural effusion Non–small cell lung cancer. Left pleural effusion and volume loss secondary to non–small cell carcinoma of the left lower lobe. The pleural effusion was sampled and found to be malignant; therefore, the lesion is inoperable.

Popcorn calcification is usually a radiologic characteristic of benign lesions.

The percentage of patients found to have lung cancer incidentally through chest radiographs has been consistently low. Clues from the chest radiograph may suggest the diagnosis of lung cancer, but may not be helpful in identifying a histologic subtype.

A study by Oken et al found that a screening chest radiograph does not improve detection and survival.[34]

Go to Radiologic Approach to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for complete information on this topic.

Previous
Next

Sputum Cytologic Studies

Centrally located endobronchial tumors may exfoliate malignant cells into sputum. (This location and tendency to exfoliate are most common in squamous cell carcinomas [SCCs].) Therefore, sputum cytology can be a quick and inexpensive diagnostic test if results are positive. The false-positive rate for sputum cytology is 1%, but the false-negative rate is as high as 40%.

A positive finding for malignancy from a cytologic specimen is accurate in as many as 90% of cases, but any distinction between different histologic subtypes is not accurate. Discordant results are often observed between cytologic and histologic findings of specimens obtained from bronchoscopy or transthoracic biopsy.

The diagnostic accuracy of sputum cytology is dependent on rigorous specimen sampling (at least 3 specimens) and preservation techniques, as well as on the location (central vs peripheral) and size of the tumor.[35] The test detects 71% of central tumors but less than 50% of peripheral tumors; therefore, further testing must always follow a negative result. Several large studies have not revealed that screening with sputum cytology and chest radiography is cost-effective in early detection.

In one small study, a cytologic specimen was used to measure EGFR and KRAS mutations; however, this practice still needs to be validated.[36]

Sputum cytology is suggested for high-risk patients in whom semi-invasive procedures such as bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle aspiration (see below) might pose a higher risk. Currently, however, with the development of advanced x-ray imaging techniques and biopsy procedures, sputum cytology is not commonly employed in the diagnosis of NSCLC.

Previous
Next

Bronchoscopy

When a lung cancer is suggested, bronchoscopy provides a means for direct visualization of the tumor, allows determination of the extent of airway obstruction, and allows collection of diagnostic material under direct visualization with direct biopsy of the visualized tumor, bronchial brushings and washing, and transbronchial biopsies.

The decision about whether to pursue a diagnostic bronchoscopy for a lesion that is suspected of being lung cancer largely depends on the location of the lesion (central vs peripheral).[37] This is the study of choice in patients with central tumors, with a combined sensitivity of 88% with this type of tumor.

The addition of transbronchial needle aspiration with endobronchial ultrasound to obtain cytology or histology samples when there is submucosal tumor spread or peribronchial tumor causing extrinsic compression further increases the sensitivity of bronchoscopy.[38]

Previous
Next

Biopsy

Transthoracic needle biopsy, guided by CT or fluoroscopy, is preferred for tumors located in the periphery of the lungs because peripheral tumors may not be accessible through a bronchoscope. A positive finding for cancer is reliable; however, the false-negative rate is high at 26%, and, thus, transthoracic biopsy is generally not useful in ruling out cancer.

Diagnostic material can also be obtained from other abnormal sites (eg, enlarged palpable lymph nodes, liver, pleural or pericardial effusions, accessible bone lesions).

Previous
Next

Thoracoscopy

Thoracoscopy is usually reserved for tumors that remain undiagnosed after bronchoscopy or CT-guided biopsy. Thoracoscopy is also an important tool in the management of malignant pleural effusions.

Video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) is a newer modality that may be used to sample small peripheral tumors (less than 2 cm in diameter), pleural tumors, or pleural effusions for diagnostic or staging purposes.[38] It is safe and can provide a definitive diagnosis with a high degree of accuracy and minimal risk to the patient. The reported sensitivity rate ranges between 0.80 and 0.99, the specificity rate ranges between 0.93 and 1, and the negative predictive value ranges between 0.93 and 0.96.[38] Survival with assisted VATS is comparable to complete VATS and can be cost-effective.[39]

Previous
Next

Computed Tomography

A chest CT scan (see the image below) is the standard for staging. The findings of CT scans of the chest and clinical presentation usually allow a presumptive differentiation between NSCLC and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Massive lymphadenopathy and direct mediastinal invasion are commonly associated with small cell carcinoma. A mass in or adjacent to the hilum is a particular characteristic of small cell cancer and is seen in about 78% of cases.[40]

Lung cancer, small cell. Contrast-enhanced CT scanLung cancer, small cell. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of the chest shows a large left lung and a hilar mass, with invasion of the left pulmonary artery.

Common sites of spread of a NSCLC include the liver and adrenals; hence, CT scanning of the chest and upper abdomen that includes the liver and adrenals is the minimum standard for a staging workup for a person newly diagnosed with NSCLC. Lung nodules incidentally detected on abdominal CT are often benign.[41]

A CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain may be required if neurological symptoms or signs (eg, mental status change) are present. Most thoracic surgeons perform imaging of the brain before attempting definitive resection of a lung malignancy.

A 2011 addition to the NCCN Guidelines for Lung Cancer Screening recommends helical low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for select patients at high risk for NSCLC.[42]

Go to Radiologic Approach to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for complete information on this topic.

Previous
Next

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MRI is most useful when evaluating a patient in whom spinal cord compression is suggested. In addition, brain MRI has a greater sensitivity than CT scan for detection of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. MRI may be used when findings of superior sulcus and brachial plexus tumors are equivocal on CT scans.

Go to Radiologic Approach to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for complete information on this topic.

Previous
Next

Bone Scintigraphy

The skeletal system is another common site of metastases for lung cancers. If patients report bone pain or if their serum calcium and/or alkaline phosphatase levels are elevated, a bone scan should be obtained to search for bone metastases (see the image below).

Lung cancer, small cell. Whole-body nuclear mediciLung cancer, small cell. Whole-body nuclear medicine bone scanning with anterior and posterior images reveal multiple abnormal areas of increased radiotracer activity in the pelvis, spine, ribs, and left scapula. These findings are consistent with bony metastatic disease. The bones are commonly affected in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
Previous
Next

Positron Emission Tomography

PET scanning (see the image below) using fluoro-18–2-deoxyglucose (FDG) has proven to be an excellent modality for evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules and has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. The average sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET scanning for detecting a malignancy was reported to be 0.97 and 0.78, respectively.[43]

Lung cancer, small cell. Coronal positron emissionLung cancer, small cell. Coronal positron emission tomogram shows abnormal areas of increased metabolic activity in the left hilar and left adrenal regions consistent with a hilar tumor with left adrenal metastasis.

Recent studies suggest that PET scanning is useful for searching for systemic spread if other diagnostic modalities cannot clarify an abnormality that may change the treatment of the patient’s condition. However, false-positive and false-negative results occur.

Additional data have emerged that underscore the importance of PET scanning in patients with NSCLC. PET scans appear to be more sensitive, specific, and accurate than CT scans for staging mediastinal disease. Whereas radiographs and CT scans show images of structures, PET scans reveal the nature of the area under study. PET scans often detect abnormalities not demonstrated on CT scans.

Published reports suggest that staging of NSCLC may be influenced by PET scan results in up to 60% of the cases and that as many as 25% of cases may be upstaged after PET scanning.

Caution is required when interpreting the results of PET scans in patients who may be denied potentially curative surgical resection based on PET results.

Go to Radiologic Approach to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for complete information on this topic.

Previous
Next

Mediastinoscopy

Mediastinoscopy may be used to obtain tissue from cancer that has infiltrated into the mediastinum.[44] It is usually performed to evaluate the status of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (seen on CT scan) before attempting definitive surgical resection of lung cancer.

Previous
Next

Needle Thoracentesis (Ultrasound Guided)

Needle thoracentesis is both diagnostic and therapeutic in patients presenting with respiratory distress. Thoracentesis has a sensitivity of only 80% with a specificity greater than 90%. In patients suspected of having lung cancer who have an accessible pleural effusion, if the pleural fluid cytology finding is negative (after at least 2 thoracenteses), thoracoscopy is recommended as the next step to aid in diagnosis.

Previous
Next

Thoracotomy

Thoracotomy is indicated only for diagnosis and treatment of clearly resectable NSCLC.

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

The updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lung cancer is widely used. Non-small cell lung cancer includes SCC, adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. Sometimes, lung cancers can exhibit 2 or more histologic patterns. SCC was previously the most common type of NSCLC, but adenocarcinoma appears to be increasing in incidence, especially in women.

SCC has a distinct dose-response relationship to tobacco smoking and usually develops in proximal airways, progressing through stages of squamous metaplasia to carcinoma in situ. Well-differentiated SCCs contain keratin pearls, while poorly differentiated SCCs may stain positive for keratin. Microscopic examination reveals cells with large, irregular nuclei and coarse nuclear chromatin with large nucleoli. Cells are arranged in sheets, and the presence of intercellular bridging is diagnostic.

Histologically, adenocarcinomas form glands and produce mucin. Mucin production can be identified with mucicarmine or periodic acid-Schiff staining. The WHO classification of lung cancer divides adenocarcinomas into (1) acinar, (2) papillary, (3) bronchoalveolar, and (4) mucus-secreting. Bronchoalveolar carcinoma is a distinct clinicopathologic entity that appears to arise from type II pneumocytes and may manifest as a solitary peripheral nodule, multifocal disease, or a pneumonic form, which can spread rapidly from one lobe to another.

Stage for stage, adenocarcinomas are associated with worse prognoses than SCCs, with the exception of T1 N0 M0 tumors.

Large cell carcinoma is the least common of all NSCLCs. It is composed of large cells with prominent nucleoli, and no mucin production or intercellular bridging is identified. Many tumors previously diagnosed as large cell carcinomas are identified as poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas or SCCs after advanced immunohistochemical staining, electron microscopy, and monoclonal antibody studies.

A variant of large cell carcinoma has been identified; it contains neuroendocrine features and is called large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas are associated with a worse prognosis than large cell carcinomas.

Go to Radiologic Aspects of Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for complete information on this topic.

WHO classification of epithelial lung tumors

WHO divides epithelial lung tumors into preinvasive lesions and invasive malignant lesions. Preinvasive lesions include the following:

  • Squamous dysplasia/carcinoma in situ
  • Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia
  • Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine hyperplasia

Invasive malignant lesions include the following:

  • Squamous cell carcinoma – Variants, papillary, clear cell, small cell, basaloid
  • Small cell carcinoma – Variant, combined small cell carcinoma
  • Adenocarcinoma – Acinar, papillary, bronchoalveolar, nonmucinous (Clara cell/type II pneumocyte) type, mixed mucinous and nonmucinous (Clara cell/type II pneumocyte and goblet cell) type or intermediate cell type, solid adenocarcinoma with mucin formation, adenocarcinoma with mixed subtypes, variants, well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma, mucinous (colloid) adenocarcinoma, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, signet-ring adenocarcinoma, clear cell adenocarcinoma
  • Large cell carcinoma – Variants, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, basaloid carcinoma, lymphoepitheliomalike carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma with rhabdoid phenotype
  • Adenosquamous carcinoma
  • Carcinoma with sarcomatoid, pleomorphic, or sarcomatous elements - Carcinoma with spindle or giant cells, pleomorphic carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, giant cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, pulmonary blastoma
  • Carcinoid tumors - Typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid
  • Carcinoma of salivary gland type - Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, others
  • Unclassified
Previous
Next

Staging

The most important prognostic indicator in lung cancer is the extent of disease and lymph node involvement. The American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and End Results Reporting has developed the TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) staging system, which takes into account the degree of spread of primary tumor, the extent of regional lymph node involvement, and the presence or absence of distant metastases (see the table below).[45] The TNM system is used for all lung carcinomas except SCLCs.

AJCC 2010 TNM staging and grouping system

Primary tumor (T) involvement is as follows:

  • Tx - Primary tumor cannot be assessed
  • T0 - No evidence of tumor
  • Tis - Carcinoma in situ
  • T1 - Tumor 3 cm or less in greatest dimension, surrounded by lung or visceral pleura, without bronchoscopic evidence of invasion more proximal than the lobar bronchus (not in the main bronchus)
  • T1a - Tumor 2 cm or less
  • T1b - Tumor more than 2 cm but 3 cm or less
  • T2 - Tumor more than 3 cm but 7 cm or less
  • T2a - Tumor more than 3 cm but 5 cm or less
  • T2b - Tumor more than 5 cm but 7 cm or less
  • T3 - Tumor more than 7 cm or one that invades any of the following: parietal pleura, chest wall, diaphragm, phrenic nerve, mediastinal pleura, or parietal pericardium; or tumor in the main bronchus (< 2 cm distal to carina but without involvement of the carina); or associated atelectasis or obstructive pneumonitis of the entire lung or separate tumor nodule in the same lobe
  • T4 - Tumor of any size that invades the following: mediastinum, heart, great vessels, trachea, recurrent laryngeal nerve, esophagus, vertebral body, or carina; separate tumor in a different ipsilateral lobe.

Lymph node (N) involvement is as follows:

  • Nx - Regional nodes cannot be assessed
  • N0 - No regional node metastasis
  • N1 - Metastasis in ipsilateral peribronchial and/or ipsilateral hilar nodes and intrapulmonary nodes, including involvement by direct extension
  • N2 - Metastasis in ipsilateral mediastinal and/or subcarinal node
  • N3 - Metastasis in contralateral mediastinal, contralateral hilar, ipsilateral or contralateral scalene node, or supraclavicular node

Metastatic (M) involvement is as follows:

  • M0 - No metastasis
  • M1 - Distant metastasis
  • M1a - Separate tumor nodule in a contralateral lobe tumor with pleural nodules or malignant pleural effusion
  • M1b - Distant metastasis

For TNM staging, NSCLC is divided into 4 stages, with further subdivision of stages I-III into A and B subtypes. These stages have important therapeutic and prognostic implications, which are discussed later.

Stage grouping of the TNM system is as follows:

  • Stage 0 - TisN0M0
  • Stage 1A - T1aN0M0 / T1bN0M0
  • Stage 1B - T2aN0M0
  • Stage IIA - T2bN0M0 / T1aN1M0 / T1bN1M0 / T1bN1M0 / T2aN1M0
  • Stage IIB - T2bN1M0 / T3N1M0
  • Stage IIIA - T1aN2M0 / T1bN2M0 / T2aN2M0 / T3N1M0 / T3N2M0 / T4N1M0
  • Stage IIIB - T1aN3M0 / T1bN3M0 / T2aN3M0 / T2bN3M0 / T3N3M0 / T4N2M0 / T4N3M0
  • Stage IV - Any T, any N, M1a / Any T, any N, M1b
  • Pleural or pericardial effusion is M1a not T4
  • Separate tumor in the contralateral lung is considered M1a
  • M1b designates distant metastases

Go to Radiologic Aspects of Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for complete information on this topic.

Previous
Next

Workup for Special Populations

Patients with CNS metastasis, immunosuppression, superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS), Pancoast tumor, and/or Ogilvie intestinal pseudo-obstruction may require specific workup, as described below. If no pathologic process is present, discharge the patient with a prescription for continuous analgesic use until follow-up care can be arranged with the patient’s personal physician.[46]

Patients with CNS metastasis and known cancer

Head CT scanning, with and without contrast enhancement to depict masses, may be indicated. Obtain a neurosurgical consultation, and contact the patient’s physician. Admit patients for possible whole-brain irradiation or resection.

Headache and brain edema may respond to dexamethasone (10 mg IV). Seizures are treated with anticonvulsants, but patients with brain metastases and no history of seizures do not generally require anticonvulsant therapy.[47]

Immunosuppressed patients with cancer and infections

Obtain a CBC for evaluation of neutropenia and other blood cell derangements. Assess electrolyte levels for signs of dehydration. The chest radiograph may show only subtle infiltrate. If diarrhea is present, perform urinalysis with a culture, blood cultures with samples from peripheral sites, cultures with samples from any indwelling catheters, and stool cultures for Clostridium difficile.

Administer broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics (eg, piperacillin, gentamicin, second- or third-generation cephalosporin) and an aminoglycoside. If the patient has a penicillin allergy, replace penicillin with carbapenem (if mild penicillin allergy) or aztreonam.

Consultation with an oncologist is indicated to begin granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Patients with Pancoast tumor

An MRI is superior to a CT scan in depicting superior sulcus tumors. Admit the patient for transthoracic needle aspiration. Perform bronchoscopy if endobronchial involvement is present.

Patients with SVCS

Lung cancer accounts for 60-80% of SVCS. Head elevation, cautious administration of fluids, and supplemental oxygen is indicated. Diuretics and glucocorticoids (methylprednisolone 125 mg IV) may help with symptoms, but their roles are unclear. Definitive treatment is usually by radiotherapy or chemotherapy and/or vena caval stenting.

Patients with Ogilvie intestinal pseudo-obstruction

Abdominal radiograph shows massive dilation of the colon and small intestine, with or without air-fluid levels. Check electrolyte levels and correct abnormalities. Place a nasogastric tube and rectal tube.

Admit the patient for possible colonic decompression and treatment of the underlying cause (eg, lung cancer producing autoantibodies to the myenteric neural plexus). For cancer patients with severe pain and advanced disease, administer opioid analgesics. Nasogastric tube and rectal tube placement may help with pain.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Winston W Tan, MD  Assistant Professor of Medicine, Mayo Medical School; Consulting Staff, Mayo Group Practices

Winston W Tan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, Philippine Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Gino A Farina, MD, FACEP, FAAEM  Associate Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Gino A Farina, MD, FACEP, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Syed Huq, MD  Fellow, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center

Syed Huq, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Informatics Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and American Society of Hematology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Irfan Maghfoor, MD  Consulting Oncologist, Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia

Irfan Maghfoor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Hematology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP  Nellie B Smith Chair of Oncology Emeritus, Director, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Deputy Director, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mityanand Ramnarine, MD  Chief Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Mityanand Ramnarine, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Emergency Physicians, Emergency Medicine Residents Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Edmond A Hooker II, MD, DrPH, FAAEM  Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; Associate Professor, Department of Health Services Administration, Xavier University

Edmond A Hooker II, MD, DrPH, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Public Health Association, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Jeffrey L Arnold, MD, FACEP  Chairman, Department of Emergency Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center

Jeffrey L Arnold, MD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine and American College of Physicians

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP  Professor of Emergency Medicine, Professor of Internal Medicine, Program Director for Emergency Medicine, Case Medical Center, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Thoracic Society, Arkansas Medical Society, New York Academy of Medicine, New York Academy of Sciences, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jules E Harris, MD  Clinical Professor of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Arizona Cancer Center

Jules E Harris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Immunologists, American Society of Hematology, and Central Society for Clinical Research

Disclosure: GlobeImmune Salary Consulting

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors Peter T Porrello, MD, and Tamas Peredy, MD, to the development and writing of a source article.

References
  1. Rosen G. A History of Public Health: Expanded Edition. Baltimore, MD.: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1993.

  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2009. American Cancer Society. Available at http://ww2.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2011.

  3. National Research Council, Committee on Health Risks of Exposure to Radon, Board on Radiation Effects Research, Commission on Life Sciences. Health effects of exposure to radon (BEIR VI). Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.; 1999.

  4. Ito H, Matsuo K, Tanaka H, Koestler DC, Ombao H, Fulton J, et al. Nonfilter and filter cigarette consumption and the incidence of lung cancer by histological type in Japan and the United States: analysis of 30-year data from population-based cancer registries. Int J Cancer. Apr 15 2011;128(8):1918-28. [Medline].

  5. Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, Schild SE, Adjei AA. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc. May 2008;83(5):584-94. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  6. Sher T, Dy GK, Adjei AA. Small cell lung cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. Mar 2008;83(3):355-67. [Medline].

  7. Beckett WS. Epidemiology and etiology of lung cancer. Clin Chest Med. Mar 1993;14(1):1-15. [Medline].

  8. Bagnardi V, Rota M, Botteri E, et al. Alcohol consumption and lung cancer risk in never smokers: a meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. Dec 2011;22(12):2631-9. [Medline].

  9. Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation - United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Nov 13 2009;58(44):1227-32. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  10. Ginsberg RJ, Vokes EE, Raben A. Non-small cell lung cancer. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven;. 1997:858-911.

  11. Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Parent ME, Hanley JA. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. Jan 2000;27(1):3-18. [Medline].

  12. Parker MS, Leveno DM, Campbell TJ, et al. AIDS-related bronchogenic carcinoma: fact or fiction?. Chest. Jan 1998;113(1):154-61. [Medline].

  13. Tirelli U, Spina M, Sandri S, et al. Lung carcinoma in 36 patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The Italian Cooperative Group on AIDS and Tumors. Cancer. Feb 1 2000;88(3):563-9. [Medline].

  14. Dubey S, Powell CA. Update in lung cancer 2008. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. May 15 2009;179(10):860-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  15. American Cancer Society. Statistics for 2006. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-figures-2006. Accessed January 11, 2011.

  16. Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C. Cancer statistics review, 1975-2002. National Cancer Institute.; 2005.

  17. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. World cancer report. Lyon, France: 2003.

  18. Jonnalagadda S, Smith C, Mhango G, Wisnivesky JP. The Number of Lymph Node Metastases as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With N1 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Chest. Aug 2011;140(2):433-40. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  19. Mostertz W, Stevenson M, Acharya C, Chan I, Walters K, Lamlertthon W, et al. Age- and sex-specific genomic profiles in non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA. Feb 10 2010;303(6):535-43. [Medline].

  20. Parsons A, Daley A, Begh R, Aveyard P. Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. BMJ. Jan 21 2010;340:b5569. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  21. Chlebowski RT, Schwartz WH, Anderson GL, Stefanick ML, Manson JE, Chien JW, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer and estrogen plus progestin use in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative randomized clinical trial2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(suppl; abstr CRA1500):18s. [Full Text].

  22. Rothwell PM, Fowkes GR, Belch JF, Ogawa H, Warlow CP, Meade TW. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials. Lancet. Dec 7/2010; Early online publication;[Full Text].

  23. Bouchardy C, Benhamou S, Schaffar R, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G, Schubert H, et al. Lung cancer mortality risk among breast cancer patients treated with anti-estrogens. Cancer. Mar 15 2011;117(6):1288-95. [Medline].

  24. Corner J, Hopkinson J, Fitzsimmons D, Barclay S, Muers M. Is late diagnosis of lung cancer inevitable? Interview study of patients' recollections of symptoms before diagnosis. Thorax. Apr 2005;60(4):314-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  25. Spiro SG, Gould MK, Colice GL. Initial evaluation of the patient with lung cancer: symptoms, signs, laboratory tests, and paraneoplastic syndromes: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. Sep 2007;132(3 Suppl):149S-160S. [Medline].

  26. Patel AM, Davila DG, Peters SG. Paraneoplastic syndromes associated with lung cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. Mar 1993;68(3):278-87. [Medline].

  27. [Guideline] Alberts WM. Diagnosis and management of lung cancer executive summary: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd Edition). Chest. Sep 2007;132(3 Suppl):1S-19S. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  28. [Guideline] Spiro SG, Gould MK, Colice GL. Initial evaluation of the patient with lung cancer: symptoms, signs, laboratory tests, and paraneoplastic syndromes: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. Sep 2007;132(3 Suppl):149S-160S. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  29. Fadel E, Missenard G, Court C, et al. Long-term outcomes of en bloc resection of non-small cell lung cancer invading the thoracic inlet and spine. Ann Thorac Surg. Sep 2011;92(3):1024-30; discussion 1030. [Medline].

  30. Annema JT, van Meerbeeck JP, Rintoul RC, Dooms C, Deschepper E, Dekkers OM, et al. Mediastinoscopy vs endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. Nov 24 2010;304(20):2245-52. [Medline].

  31. Hofman V, Bonnetaud C, Ilie MI, Vielh P, Vignaud JM, Fléjou JF, et al. Preoperative circulating tumor cell detection using the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell method for patients with lung cancer is a new prognostic biomarker. Clin Cancer Res. Feb 15 2011;17(4):827-35. [Medline].

  32. Wicha MS, Hayes DF. Circulating tumor cells: not all detected cells are bad and not all bad cells are detected. J Clin Oncol. Apr 20 2011;29(12):1508-11. [Medline].

  33. Jonnalagadda S, Smith C, Mhango G, Wisnivesky JP. The Number of Lymph Node Metastases as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with N1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Chest. Feb 3 2011;[Medline].

  34. Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA, et al. Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA. Nov 2 2011;306(17):1865-73. [Medline].

  35. Erkiliç S, Ozsaraç C, Küllü S. Sputum cytology for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Comparison of smear and modified cell block methods. Acta Cytol. Nov-Dec 2003;47(6):1023-7. [Medline].

  36. Billah S, Stewart J, Staerkel G, et al. EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung carcinoma: molecular testing by using cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. Apr 25 2011;119(2):111-7. [Medline].

  37. Arroliga AC, Matthay RA. The role of bronchoscopy in lung cancer. Clin Chest Med. Mar 1993;14(1):87-98. [Medline].

  38. Schreiber G, McCrory DC. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence. Chest. Jan 2003;123(1 Suppl):115S-128S. [Medline].

  39. He J, Shao W, Cao C, et al. Long-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of complete versus assisted video-assisted thoracic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer. J Surg Oncol. Aug 1 2011;104(2):162-8. [Medline].

  40. Foster BB, Muller NL, Miller RR, et al. Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung: clinical, radiologic and pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1989;170:441-445.

  41. Alpert JB, Fantauzzi JP, Melamud K, Greenwood H, Naidich DP, Ko JP. Clinical Significance of Lung Nodules Reported on Abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 2012;198(4):793-9. [Medline].

  42. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Lung Cancer Screening, v 1.2012. Available at http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 10/28/11.

  43. Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. Feb 21 2001;285(7):914-24. [Medline].

  44. Mentzer SJ, Swanson SJ, DeCamp MM, Bueno R, Sugarbaker DJ. Mediastinoscopy, thoracoscopy, and video-assisted thoracic surgery in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Chest. Oct 1997;112(4 Suppl):239S-241S. [Medline].

  45. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Lung. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 7th ed. Chicago, Ill: Springer; 2010:Chapter 25.

  46. Tintinalli JE. Emergency complications of malignancy. In: Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Guide. 2004:1319-1368.

  47. Halfdanarson TR, Hogan WJ, Moynihan TJ. Oncologic emergencies: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. Jun 2006;81(6):835-48. [Medline].

  48. Okada M, Nakayama H, Okumura S, et al. Multicenter analysis of high-resolution computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings to choose therapeutic strategies for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jun 2011;141(6):1384-91. [Medline].

  49. Ma Z, Dong A, Fan J, Cheng H. Does sleeve lobectomy concomitant with or without pulmonary artery reconstruction (double sleeve) have favorable results for non-small cell lung cancer compared with pneumonectomy? A meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Jul 2007;32(1):20-8. [Medline].

  50. Kates M, Swanson S, Wisnivesky JP. Survival following lobectomy and limited resection for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer<=1 cm in size: a review of SEER data. Chest. Mar 2011;139(3):491-6. [Medline].

  51. Clinical Trials PDQ. Phase III Randomized Study of Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection in Patients With Small Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Available at http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/CALGB-140503. Accessed February 9, 2011.

  52. Phase III Randomized Study of Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection in Patients With Small Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. National Cancer Institute. Available at http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/CALGB-140503. Accessed February 9, 2011.

  53. Wolf AS, Richards WG, Jaklitsch MT, et al. Lobectomy versus sublobar resection for small (2 cm or less) non-small cell lung cancers. Ann Thorac Surg. Nov 2011;92(5):1819-23; discussion 1824-5. [Medline].

  54. Cattaneo SM, Park BJ, Wilton AS, Seshan VE, Bains MS, Downey RJ, et al. Use of video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy in the elderly results in fewer complications. Ann Thorac Surg. Jan 2008;85(1):231-5; discussion 235-6. [Medline].

  55. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NSCLC Practice Guidelines, v 2.2009. Available at www.nccn.org. Accessed May 2009.

  56. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE 2nd, D'Amico TA, Demmy TL, McKenna RJ Jr, Green MR, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802--a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol. Nov 1 2007;25(31):4993-7. [Medline].

  57. Allen MS, Darling GE, et al. Number of lymph nodes harvested from a mediastinal lymphadenectomy: Results of the randomized, prospective ACOSOG ZOO30 trial ACOSOG ZOO30 Study Group ASCO Meeting Abstracts. Jun 20 2007;7555.

  58. Allen JW, Farooq A, O'Brien TF, Osarogiagbon RU. Quality of surgical resection for nonsmall cell lung cancer in a US metropolitan area. Cancer. Jan 1 2011;117(1):134-42. [Medline].

  59. Yun YH, Kim YA, Min YH, Chang YJ, Lee J, Kim MS, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life in Disease-Free Survivors of Surgically Treated Lung Cancer Compared With the General Population. Ann Surg. Mar 30 2012;[Medline].

  60. Rowell NP, Williams CJ. Radical radiotherapy for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer in patients not sufficiently fit for or declining surgery (medically inoperable): a systematic review. Thorax. Aug 2001;56(8):628-38. [Medline].

  61. Strand TE, Brunsvig PF, Johannessen DC, et al. Potentially curative radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer in Norway: a population-based study of survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. May 1 2011;80(1):133-41. [Medline].

  62. Dosoretz DE, Katin MJ, Blitzer PH, et al. Radiation therapy in the management of medically inoperable carcinoma of the lung: results and implications for future treatment strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;24(1):3-9. [Medline].

  63. Jeremic B, Milicic B, Milisavljevic S. Clinical prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced (stage III) nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy with and without concurrent chemotherapy: single-Institution Experience in 600 Patients. Cancer. Jan 10 2011;[Medline].

  64. Onishi H, Shirato H, Nagata Y, Hiraoka M, Fujino M, Gomi K. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study. J Thorac Oncol. Jul 2007;2(7 Suppl 3):S94-100. [Medline].

  65. Grills IS, Mangona VS, Welsh R, Chmielewski G, McInerney E, Martin S, et al. Outcomes after stereotactic lung radiotherapy or wedge resection for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. Feb 20 2010;28(6):928-35. [Medline].

  66. Lencioni R, Crocetti L, Cioni R, Suh R, Glenn D, Regge D. Response to radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary tumours: a prospective, intention-to-treat, multicentre clinical trial (the RAPTURE study). Lancet Oncol. Jul 2008;9(7):621-8. [Medline].

  67. PORT Meta-analysis Trialists Group. Postoperative radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from nine randomised controlled trials. Lancet. Jul 25 1998;352(9124):257-63. [Medline].

  68. Rusch VW, Albain KS, Crowley JJ, et al. Surgical resection of stage IIIA and stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer after concurrent induction chemoradiotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jan 1993;105(1):97-104; discussion 104-6. [Medline].

  69. Wisnivesky JP, Smith CB, Packer S, et al. Survival and risk of adverse events in older patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stages II-IIIA lung cancer: observational cohort study. BMJ. Jul 14 2011;343:d4013. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  70. Muirhead R, van der Weide L, van Sornsen de Koste JR, Cover KS, Senan S. Use of megavoltage cine-images for studying intra-thoracic motion during radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. May 2011;99(2):155-60. [Medline].

  71. Rosell R, Gomez-Codina J, Camps C, et al. A randomized trial comparing preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery with surgery alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:153-158. [Medline].

  72. Roth JA, Fossella F, Komaki R, et al. A randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with surgery alone in resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:673-680. [Medline].

  73. [Best Evidence] NSCLC Meta-Analyses collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1 2008;26(28):4617-25. [Medline].

  74. Marino P, Pampallona S, Preatoni A, et al. Chemotherapy vs supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Results of a meta-analysis of the literature. Chest. Sep 1994;106(3):861-5. [Medline].

  75. Delbaldo C, Michiels S, Syz N, Soria JC, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP. Benefits of adding a drug to a single-agent or a 2-agent chemotherapy regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA. Jul 28 2004;292(4):470-84. [Medline].

  76. Weick JK, Crowley J, Natale RB, et al. A randomized trial of five cisplatin-containing treatments in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. Jul 1991;9(7):1157-62. [Medline].

  77. Rajeswaran A, Trojan A, Burnand B, Giannelli M. Efficacy and side effects of cisplatin- and carboplatin-based doublet chemotherapeutic regimens versus non-platinum-based doublet chemotherapeutic regimens as first line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Lung Cancer. Jan 2008;59(1):1-11. [Medline].

  78. Le Chevalier T, Scagliotti G, Natale R, Danson S, Rosell R, Stahel R, et al. Efficacy of gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy compared with other platinum containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of survival outcomes. Lung Cancer. Jan 2005;47(1):69-80. [Medline].

  79. Quoix E, Zalcman G, Oster JP, et al. Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. Sep 17 2011;378(9796):1079-88. [Medline].

  80. Pallis AG, Karampeazis A, Vamvakas L, et al. Efficacy and treatment tolerance in older patients with NSCLC: a meta-analysis of five phase III randomized trials conducted by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group. Ann Oncol. Nov 2011;22(11):2448-55. [Medline].

  81. Wanders R, Steevens J, Botterweck A, et al. Treatment with curative intent of stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients of 75 years: a prospective population-based study. Eur J Cancer. Dec 2011;47(18):2691-7. [Medline].

  82. [Best Evidence] Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2008;26(21):3543-51. [Medline].

  83. [Best Evidence] Fidias PM, Dakhil SR, Lyss AP, Loesch DM, Waterhouse DM, et al. Phase III study of immediate compared with delayed docetaxel after front-line therapy with gemcitabine plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1 2009;27(4):591-8. [Medline].

  84. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. May 1 2004;22(9):1589-97. [Medline].

  85. [Best Evidence] Holm B, Mellemgaard A, Skov T, Skov BG. Different impact of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 on survival in male and female patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer treated with carboplatin and gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol. Sep 10 2009;27(26):4254-9. [Medline].

  86. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Aug 19 2010;363(8):733-42. [Medline].

  87. Dillman RO, Seagren SL, Propert KJ, et al. A randomized trial of induction chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation versus radiation alone in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Oct 4 1990;323(14):940-5. [Medline].

  88. Le Chevalier T, Arriagada R, Quoix E, et al. Radiotherapy alone versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: first analysis of a randomized trial in 353 patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. Mar 20 1991;83(6):417-23. [Medline].

  89. Albain KS, Rusch VW, Crowley JJ, et al. Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus chest radiotherapy followed by surgery for stages IIIA (N2) and IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: mature results of Southwest Oncology Group phase II study 8805. J Clin Oncol. Aug 1995;13(8):1880-92. [Medline].

  90. Schaake-Koning C, van den Bogaert W, Dalesio O, et al. Effects of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy on inoperable non- small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Feb 20 1992;326(8):524-30. [Medline].

  91. Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VR, et al. Phase III study of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CT/RT) vs CT/RT followed by surgical resection for stage IIIA(pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Outcomes update of North American Intergroup 0139 (RTOG 9309). J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:624s.

  92. Curran WJ, Scott C, Langer C, et al. Long-term benefit is observed in a phase III comparison of sequential vs concurrent chemo-radiation for patients with unresected stage III non small cell lung cancer: RTOG 9410 (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;22:621a.

  93. Curran WJ, Scott C, Langer C, et al. Phase III Comparison of Sequential vs Concurrent Chemoradiation for Patients (Pts) with Unresected Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Initial Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9410. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2000;19:484a.

  94. Belani CP, Choy H, Bonomi P, Scott C, Travis P, Haluschak J, et al. Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol. J Clin Oncol. Sep 1 2005;23(25):5883-91. [Medline].

  95. Johnson DH, Paul DM, Hande KR, et al. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. Jul 1996;14(7):2054-60. [Medline].

  96. Langer CJ, Leighton JC, Comis RL, et al. Paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II toxicity, response, and survival analysis. J Clin Oncol. Aug 1995;13(8):1860-70. [Medline].

  97. [Best Evidence] Hanna N, Neubauer M, Yiannoutsos C, McGarry R, Arseneau J, Ansari R, et al. Phase III study of cisplatin, etoposide, and concurrent chest radiation with or without consolidation docetaxel in patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: the Hoosier Oncology Group and U.S. Oncology. J Clin Oncol. Dec 10 2008;26(35):5755-60. [Medline].

  98. Curran WJ Jr, Paulus R, Langer CJ, et al. Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410. J Natl Cancer Inst. Oct 5 2011;103(19):1452-60. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  99. Schumacher A, Riesenbeck D, Braunheim M, et al. Combined modality treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: preoperative chemoradiation does not result in a poorer quality of life. Lung Cancer. Apr 2004;44(1):89-97. [Medline].

  100. Daly BD, Ebright MI, Walkey AJ, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection on node-negative T3 and T4 non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jun 2011;141(6):1392-7. [Medline].

  101. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. May 20 2004;350(21):2129-39. [Medline].

  102. Thatcher N, Chang A, Parikh P, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, von Pawel J, et al. Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer). Lancet. Oct 29-Nov 4 2005;366(9496):1527-37. [Medline].

  103. [Best Evidence] Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. Sep 3 2009;361(10):947-57. [Medline].

  104. Fukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Biomarker Analyses and Final Overall Survival Results From a Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, First-Line Study of Gefitinib Versus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Clinically Selected Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2011;29(21):2866-74. [Medline].

  105. Shepherd FA, Pereira J, Ciuleanu TE, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following failure of 1st line or 2nd line chemotherapy. A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;Vol 22, No 14S (July 15 Supplement):Abstract 7022.

  106. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Jul 14 2005;353(2):123-32. [Medline].

  107. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. Aug 2011;12(8):735-42. [Medline].

  108. Herbst RS, Ansari R, Bustin F, et al. Efficacy of bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of standard first-line chemotherapy (BeTa): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. May 28 2011;377(9780):1846-54. [Medline].

  109. Hirsch FR, Kabbinavar F, Eisen T, et al. A randomized, phase II, biomarker-selected study comparing erlotinib to erlotinib intercalated with chemotherapy in first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. Sep 10 2011;29(26):3567-73. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  110. Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C, Porta R, Cardenal F, Camps C, et al. Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Sep 3 2009;361(10):958-67. [Medline].

  111. Pirker R, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, et al. FLEX: A randomized, multicenter, phase III study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin/vinorelbine (CV) versus CV alone in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1006s (Abstract).

  112. de Boer RH, Arrieta O, Yang CH, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, et al. Vandetanib Plus Pemetrexed for the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. Mar 10 2011;29(8):1067-74. [Medline].

  113. Pirker R, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, et al. EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol. Jan 2012;13(1):33-42. [Medline].

  114. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Dec 14 2006;355(24):2542-50. [Medline].

  115. [Best Evidence] Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, Ramlau R, Gorbounova V, Hirsh V, et al. Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAil. J Clin Oncol. Mar 10 2009;27(8):1227-34. [Medline].

  116. [Best Evidence] Karp DD, Paz-Ares LG, Novello S, Haluska P, Garland L, Cardenal F, et al. Phase II study of the anti-insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor antibody CP-751,871 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated, locally advanced, or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. May 20 2009;27(15):2516-22. [Medline].

  117. Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Solomon B, Maki RG, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Oct 28 2010;363(18):1693-703. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  118. [Best Evidence] Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV, Douillard JY, Shepherd FA, Stephens RJ, et al. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2008;26(21):3552-9. [Medline].

  119. [Best Evidence] Strauss GM, Herndon JE 2nd, Maddaus MA, Johnstone DW, Johnson EA, Harpole DH, et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups. J Clin Oncol. Nov 1 2008;26(31):5043-51. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  120. Gore EM, Bae K, Wong SJ, Sun A, Bonner JA, Schild SE, et al. Phase III comparison of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: primary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group study RTOG 0214. J Clin Oncol. Jan 20 2011;29(3):272-8. [Medline].

  121. Sun A, Bae K, Gore EM, Movsas B, Wong SJ, Meyers CA, et al. Phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation compared with observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: neurocognitive and quality-of-life analysis. J Clin Oncol. Jan 20 2011;29(3):279-86. [Medline].

  122. [Best Evidence] Lynch TJ, Patel T, Dreisbach L, McCleod M, Heim WJ, Hermann RC, et al. Cetuximab and first-line taxane/carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the randomized multicenter phase III trial BMS099. J Clin Oncol. Feb 20 2010;28(6):911-7. [Medline].

  123. Biesma B, Wymenga AN, Vincent A, et al. Quality of life, geriatric assessment and survival in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with carboplatin-gemcitabine or carboplatin-paclitaxel: NVALT-3 a phase III study. Ann Oncol. Jul 2011;22(7):1520-7. [Medline].

  124. Raz DJ, Lanuti M, Gaissert HC, et al. Outcomes of patients with isolated adrenal metastasis from non-small cell lung carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. Nov 2011;92(5):1788-92; discussion 1793. [Medline].

  125. [Guideline] Azzoli CG, Baker S Jr, Temin S, Pao W, Aliff T, Brahmer J, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. Dec 20 2009;27(36):6251-66. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  126. Ciuleanu T, Brodowicz T, Zielinski C, Kim JH, Krzakowski M, Laack E, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet. Oct 24 2009;374(9699):1432-40. [Medline].

  127. Mallin R. Smoking cessation: integration of behavioral and drug therapies. Am Fam Physician. Mar 15 2002;65(6):1107-14. [Medline].

  128. Jorenby DE, Leischow SJ, Nides MA, Rennard SI, Johnston JA, Hughes AR, et al. A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. Mar 4 1999;340(9):685-91. [Medline].

  129. Moysich KB, Menezes RJ, Ronsani A, Swede H, Reid ME, Cummings KM, et al. Regular aspirin use and lung cancer risk. BMC Cancer. Nov 26 2002;2:31. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  130. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening. N Engl J Med. Jun 29 2011;[Medline].

  131. Jacobs PC, Gondrie MJ, van der Graaf Y, de Koning HJ, Isgum I, van Ginneken B, et al. Coronary Artery Calcium Can Predict All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events on Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Mar 2012;198(3):505-11. [Medline].

  132. Gohagan J, Marcus P, Fagerstrom R, Pinsky P, Kramer B, Prorok P. Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute. Chest. Jul 2004;126(1):114-21. [Medline].

  133. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Jan 22 2004;350(4):351-60. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Non–small cell lung cancer. Symptoms and signs of lung cancer.
Non–small cell lung cancer. Diagnostic approach for possible lung cancer.
Staging workup for non–small cell lung cancer.
Treatment recommendations and future research directions in the management of non–small cell lung cancer.
Non–small cell lung cancer. Performance status scales for patients with cancer.
Non–small cell lung cancer. Prognostic factors for lung cancer.
Non–small cell lung cancer. Bronchoscopy. A large central lesion was diagnosed as non–small cell carcinoma.
Non–small cell lung cancer. Left pleural effusion and volume loss secondary to non–small cell carcinoma of the left lower lobe. The pleural effusion was sampled and found to be malignant; therefore, the lesion is inoperable.
Non–small cell lung cancer. Left upper collapse is almost always secondary to endobronchial bronchogenic carcinoma.
Non–small cell lung cancer. Complete left lung collapse secondary to bronchogenic carcinoma of left mainstem bronchus.
Non–small cell lung cancer. A cavitating right lower lobe squamous cell carcinoma.
Non–small cell lung cancer. CT scan shows cavitation and air-fluid level.
Non–small cell lung cancer. Patient has right lower lobe opacity. This is not well circumscribed and was found to be a squamous cell carcinoma.
Lung cancer, small cell. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of the chest shows a large left lung and a hilar mass, with invasion of the left pulmonary artery.
Lung cancer, small cell. Coronal positron emission tomogram shows abnormal areas of increased metabolic activity in the left hilar and left adrenal regions consistent with a hilar tumor with left adrenal metastasis.
Lung cancer, small cell. Whole-body nuclear medicine bone scanning with anterior and posterior images reveal multiple abnormal areas of increased radiotracer activity in the pelvis, spine, ribs, and left scapula. These findings are consistent with bony metastatic disease. The bones are commonly affected in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.