Small Cell Lung Cancer Workup

  • Author: Winston W Tan, MD; Chief Editor: Jules E Harris, MD   more...
 
Updated: Mar 1, 2012
 

Approach Considerations

A thorough history and physical examination usually provide clues to the organ systems involved, and these are used to guide further workup (see Clinical Presentation).

Investigations are performed to identify limited-stage disease (ie, potentially curable and requiring the addition of radiotherapy to its management), as well as to assess organ function before starting therapy.

Next

Staging Workup

The purpose of the staging workup for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is to determine the prognosis and management of this disease. Patients with limited-stage disease are offered combined chemoradiotherapy, whereas those with extensive-stage disease are usually treated with chemotherapy alone. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 2007 evidence-based clinical practice guideline for management of SCLC supports the staging workup outlined below.[23]

Staging workup of small cell lung cancer is as follows:

  • Complete history and physical examination (see Clinical Presentation)
  • Complete blood cell (CBC) count with differential
  • Serum electrolytes levels, including calcium
  • Liver function tests (LFTs)
  • Renal function tests
  • Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level
  • Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level
  • Chest radiography
  • Computed tomography (CT) scanning of the chest and abdomen
  • CT scanning/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain
  • Bone scanning
  • Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy if abnormalities are present in the CBC count or peripheral smear

Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning still is under evaluation for lung cancers and, to date, has had its greatest application in non-small-cell lung cancer, in which it is used to more accurately stage patients before anticipated surgery. The 2007 ACCP guidelines do not recommend PET for routine staging of SCLC.[23] The 2011 NCCN guidelines note that PET is inferior to MRI or CT, that PET-CT is superior to PET alone, and that although PET may improve the accuracy of staging, it still requires confirmation by pathology testing.[22]

Previous
Next

Routine Laboratory Studies

Complete blood cell (CBC) count with differential, serum electrolyte levels, renal function studies, and liver function tests (LFTs) are all part of the routine staging workup, and in some cases they may reveal the site of metastasis (eg, elevated serum calcium level with bone metastasis). These tests are also important to assess organ function before starting therapy.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and sodium levels also provide prognostic information. Increased uric acid levels may indicate the possibility of rapid tumor lysis syndrome with therapy.

CBC count

In 5-10% of patients, the disease may have spread to bone marrow at presentation. Bone marrow examination is not routinely performed unless abnormalities are identified in the CBC count or peripheral smear examination, raising the possibility of bone marrow spread. These may include variable degrees of cytopenias; the presence of immature white and red blood cells (a leukoerythroblastic blood picture) raises the possibility of myelophthisic anemia. Additionally, before instituting initial full-dose combination chemotherapy, the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) should be greater than 1000 x 103/µL, hemoglobin >10 g/dL and the platelet count greater than 100 x 103/µL.

Serum chemistries

Elevated serum calcium and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels raise the suspicion of bone metastasis, and a bone scan should be ordered even in the absence of symptoms. Serum electrolytes should be obtained to look for paraneoplastic syndromes; the presence of hyponatremia is considered an adverse prognostic indicator.

Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) indicates an increased tumor mass and cell turnover and is also an adverse prognostic indicator. Abnormal liver function findings raise the possibility of hepatic metastasis and may provide a clue to the cause (eg, biliary outflow obstruction vs parenchymal liver metastasis).

Previous
Next

Bone Marrow Studies

Most clinicians recommend bone marrow examination only in patients in whom bone marrow involvement is suspected owing to abnormal findings on a complete blood cell (CBC) count or peripheral smear. Bone marrow examination is necessary in patients in whom myelophthisic anemia (leukoerythroblastic peripheral blood smear) is suspected.

Previous
Next

Thoracic Imaging Studies

Good posteroanterior and lateral radiographs are useful in identifying the primary tumor as well as concurrent parenchymal abnormalities. Mediastinal widening may be noticed as well.

Evaluation via computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax (lungs and mediastinum) and commonly involved abdominal viscera (ie, liver, adrenals) is the minimum requirement in standard staging workup of small cell lung cancer. (In the United States, CT scans of the chest and upper abdomen to include the liver and adrenal glands are standard.)

Low-dose CT scanning reduced lung cancer mortality in a randomized trial.[24]

CT scanning of all common sites of metastasis should be obtained to stage the disease adequately. The 2011 NCCN guidelines recommend using intravenous contrast when possible in performing CTs of the chest, liver, and adrenals.[22]

Previous
Next

Brain and Spinal Cord Imaging Studies

Brain metastasis may be present in as many as 10% of patients at diagnosis and may be occult in 5% of patients.

Most clinicians would order a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain in asymptomatic or patients with neurologic symptoms. Because MRI is more sensitive than CT scanning with contrast for detection of brain metastasis, it is used as the first-line imaging study in many institutions.

MRI has an increased ability to detect disease in proximity to neurovascular structures and is considered standard in the workup of patients in whom spinal cord compression is suspected.

Although a CT myelogram can establish the diagnosis of vertebral and paraspinal metastases, it is rarely used today. MRI is noninvasive and very sensitive in establishing the diagnosis in almost all cases.

Previous
Next

Skeletal Radionuclide Imaging

Bone is a common site of metastasis for small cell lung cancer, and a radionuclide bone scan should be obtained to identify bone metastases. Bone metastases from small cell lung cancer are predominantly osteoblastic, and a bone scan is superior to plain radiographs in detecting osteoblastic lesions. However, because some benign etiologies can also cause abnormalities on bone scans, obtaining plain radiographs of abnormal areas for radiographic correlation is important.

Bone scans should be obtained in all patients with small cell lung cancer at diagnosis or during follow-up if new bone symptoms develop or if serum calcium or alkaline phosphatase level is elevated.

Previous
Next

Bronchoscopy

Small cell lung cancer is usually centrally located and can be approached easily with a bronchoscope. The advantage of endoscopy is direct visualization of the tumor, allowing for direct biopsy as well as cytologic examination of bronchial washings.

Previous
Next

Sputum Cytology

Sputum cytology is a noninvasive test and, if positive, would help the clinician direct his or her attention to further workup of lung cancer and further confirm the exact pathology through biopsy. The highest yield of this test is with large, central tumors. However, because small cell lung cancer cells involve the submucosal layer of the bronchi with little or no exophytic endobronchial extension, sputum cytology may be uncommonly positive. This may be true as well of bronchial washings.

Previous
Next

Transthoracic Percutaneous FNA

For accessible tumors, transthoracic percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is less invasive than bronchoscopy and is carried out under computed tomography (CT) scan guidance.

Previous
Next

Thoracentesis

The presence of malignant pleural effusion upstages the disease to extensive stage. For adequate staging, pleural effusions should be aspirated and examined for malignant cells if no other sites of distant spread are identified.

If a large symptomatic pleural effusion is present, therapeutic thoracentesis provides symptomatic relief. In patients with resistant, relapsed, or nonresponding disease, thoracentesis can be combined with pleurodesis to prevent recurrence. The preferred agent is currently sterilized talc, which can be instilled either as a slurry or as a powder during pleuroscopy. A large randomized study conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) will likely answer the question of whether slurry or poudrage is superior.

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Small cell lung cancer is typically centrally located, arising in peribronchial locations. They are thought to arise from Kulchitsky cells. The tumor is composed of sheets of small, round cells with dark nuclei, scant cytoplasm, fine granular nuclear chromatin, and indistinct nucleoli.[25] Very high rates of cell division are observed, and necrosis, sometimes extensive, may be seen. Because of the central location, the cells exfoliate in sputum and bronchial washings.

Crush artifact leading to nuclear molding is a common finding, but it is not considered diagnostic.

Neurosecretory granules can be identified on electron microscopy, and the neuroendocrine nature of the neoplasm is suggested by its frequent association with paraneoplastic syndromes caused by peptide hormones.

Immunohistochemical stains for chromogranin, neuron-specific enolase, and synaptophysin are usually positive.

Approximately 5% of small cell lung cancers exhibit features of mixed small cell and large cell components and, less frequently, they may exhibit mixed small cell and squamous cell components.

The World Health Organization (WHO) classified small cell lung cancers into 3 subcategories: oat cell carcinoma, intermediate cell type, and combined oat cell carcinoma. However, this subclassification was difficult to reproduce, even by expert lung cancer pathologists, and in 1988, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommended dropping the intermediate cell type from the classification and adding the category of mixed small cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma.[26]

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Winston W Tan, MD  Assistant Professor of Medicine, Mayo Medical School; Consulting Staff, Mayo Group Practices

Winston W Tan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, Philippine Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Irfan Maghfoor, MD  Consulting Oncologist, Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia

Irfan Maghfoor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Hematology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP  Nellie B Smith Chair of Oncology Emeritus, Director, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Deputy Director, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Chief Editor

Jules E Harris, MD  Clinical Professor of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Arizona Cancer Center

Jules E Harris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Immunologists, American Society of Hematology, and Central Society for Clinical Research

Disclosure: GlobeImmune Salary Consulting

References
  1. Boffetta P, Trichopoulos D. Cancer of the lung, larynx, and pleura. In: Adami H, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D, eds. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008:349-67.

  2. Krug LM, Kris MG, Rosenzweig K, Travis WD. Cancer of the lung. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2008:947-66.

  3. Tsao A, Glisson B. Small cell lung cancer. In: Kantarjian H, Wolff R, Koller C, eds. MD Anderson Manual of Medical Oncology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2006:233-56.

  4. Schreiber D, Rineer J, Vongtama D, et al. Surgery for limited-stage small cell lung cancer, should the paradigm shift? A SEER-based analysis. J Clin Oncol (Suppl). 2008;26:403s.

  5. Johnson BE, Ihde DC, Makuch RW, Gazdar AF, Carney DN, Oie H, et al. myc family oncogene amplification in tumor cell lines established from small cell lung cancer patients and its relationship to clinical status and course. J Clin Invest. Jun 1987;79(6):1629-34. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  6. Little CD, Nau MM, Carney DN, Gazdar AF, Minna JD. Amplification and expression of the c-myc oncogene in human lung cancer cell lines. Nature. Nov 10-16 1983;306(5939):194-6. [Medline].

  7. Schneider PM, Hung MC, Chiocca SM, Manning J, Zhao XY, Fang K, et al. Differential expression of the c-erbB-2 gene in human small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. Sep 15 1989;49(18):4968-71. [Medline].

  8. Hensel CH, Hsieh CL, Gazdar AF, Johnson BE, Sakaguchi AY, Naylor SL, et al. Altered structure and expression of the human retinoblastoma susceptibility gene in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. May 15 1990;50(10):3067-72. [Medline].

  9. Naylor SL, Johnson BE, Minna JD, Sakaguchi AY. Loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 3p markers in small-cell lung cancer. Nature. Oct 1-7 1987;329(6138):451-4. [Medline].

  10. D'Amico D, Carbone D, Mitsudomi T, Nau M, Fedorko J, Russell E, et al. High frequency of somatically acquired p53 mutations in small-cell lung cancer cell lines and tumors. Oncogene. Feb 1992;7(2):339-46. [Medline].

  11. Mitsudomi T, Lam S, Shirakusa T, Gazdar AF. Detection and sequencing of p53 gene mutations in bronchial biopsy samples in patients with lung cancer. Chest. Aug 1993;104(2):362-5. [Medline].

  12. WYNDER EL, GRAHAM EA. Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma; a study of 684 proved cases. J Am Med Assoc. May 27 1950;143(4):329-36. [Medline].

  13. Parsons A, Daley A, Begh R, Aveyard P. Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. BMJ. Jan 21 2010;340:b5569. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  14. Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD, Rebecca Siegel, MPH, Elizabeth Ward, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71-96. [Full Text].

  15. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2008. Accessed December 21, 2010. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-figures-2008.

  16. Frank AL. Epidemiology of lung cancer. In: Roth JA, Ruckdeschel J, Weisenburger T, eds. Thoracic Oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1989:6-15.

  17. Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, Read W, Tierney R, Vlahiotis A, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1 2006;24(28):4539-44. [Medline].

  18. zz.

  19. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2009. Accessed December 21, 2010. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-figures-2009.

  20. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2010. Accessed December 21, 2010. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-and-figures-2010.

  21. Arriagada R, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Rivière A, Monnet I, Chomy P, et al. Initial chemotherapeutic doses and survival in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Dec 16 1993;329(25):1848-52. [Medline].

  22. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Small Cell Lung Cancer [serial online]. 2011;v.2. Available with free registration at www.nccn.org:Accessed May 21 2011. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/sclc.pdf.

  23. [Guideline] Simon GR, Turrisi A. Management of small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. Sep 2007;132(3 Suppl):324S-339S. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  24. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening. N Engl J Med. Jun 29 2011;[Medline].

  25. Zakowski MF. Pathology of small cell carcinoma of the lung. Semin Oncol. Feb 2003;30(1):3-8. [Medline].

  26. Hirsch FR, Matthews MJ, Aisner S, Campobasso O, Elema JD, Gazdar AF, et al. Histopathologic classification of small cell lung cancer. Changing concepts and terminology. Cancer. Sep 1 1988;62(5):973-7. [Medline].

  27. [Best Evidence] Amarasena IU, Walters JA, Wood-Baker R, Fong K. Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Oct 8 2008;CD006849. [Medline].

  28. Hanna NH, Einhorn LH. Small-cell lung cancer: state of the art. Clin Lung Cancer. Sep 2002;4(2):87-94. [Medline].

  29. Lally BE, Urbanic JJ, Blackstock AW, Miller AA, Perry MC. Small cell lung cancer: have we made any progress over the last 25 years?. Oncologist. Sep 2007;12(9):1096-104. [Medline].

  30. Schmittel A, Sebastian M, Fischer von Weikersthal L, et al. A German multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan-carboplatin with etoposide-carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. Aug 2011;22(8):1798-804. [Medline].

  31. Demetri G, Elias A, Gershenson D, Fossella F, Grecula J, Mittal B, et al. NCCN Small-Cell Lung Cancer Practice Guidelines. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Oncology (Williston Park). Nov 1996;10(11 Suppl):179-94. [Medline].

  32. Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, et al. Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial. J Clin Oncol. Jun 1 2011;29(16):2215-22. [Medline].

  33. Klasa RJ, Murray N, Coldman AJ. Dose-intensity meta-analysis of chemotherapy regimens in small-cell carcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol. Mar 1991;9(3):499-508. [Medline].

  34. Takada M, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Yokota S, et al. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with cisplatin and etoposide for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9104. J Clin Oncol. Jul 15 2002;20(14):3054-60. [Medline].

  35. Turrisi AT 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, Sause WT, Livingston RB, Komaki R, et al. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N Engl J Med. Jan 28 1999;340(4):265-71. [Medline].

  36. [Best Evidence] Slotman B, Faivre-Finn C, Kramer G, Rankin E, Snee M, Hatton M, et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Aug 16 2007;357(7):664-72. [Medline].

  37. Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, Negoro S, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, et al. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. Jan 10 2002;346(2):85-91. [Medline].

  38. Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C, Einhorn L, Guthrie T Jr, Beck T, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. May 1 2006;24(13):2038-43. [Medline].

  39. Natale R, Lara P, Chansky K, et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin (IP) with etoposide/cisplatin (EP) in patients (pts) with previously untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer (E-SCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26 (suppl):400s.

  40. Heigener D, Freitag L, Eschbach C et al. Topotecan/cisplatin (TP) compared to cisplatin/etoposide (PE) for patients with extensive disease-small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC): final results of a randomised phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26 (suppl):400s.

  41. Harris S, Chan MD, Lovato JF, Ellis TL, Tatter SB, Daniel Bourland J, et al. Gamma Knife Stereotactic radiosurgery as Salvage Therapy after Failure of Whole-Brain Radiotherapy in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Feb 17 2012;[Medline].

  42. Jotte R, Conkling P, Reynolds C, Galsky MD, Klein L, Fitzgibbons JF, et al. Randomized phase II trial of single-agent amrubicin or topotecan as second-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. Jan 20 2011;29(3):287-93. [Medline].

  43. Ihde DC, Mulshine JL, Kramer BS, Steinberg SM, Linnoila RI, Gazdar AF, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of high-dose and standard-dose etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1994;12(10):2022-34. [Medline].

  44. Johnson BE, Bridges JD, Sobczeck M, Gray J, Linnoila RI, Gazdar AF, et al. Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent twice-daily chest radiotherapy and etoposide/cisplatin followed by cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine. J Clin Oncol. Mar 1996;14(3):806-13. [Medline].

  45. Johnson BE, Grayson J, Makuch RW, Linnoila RI, Anderson MJ, Cohen MH, et al. Ten-year survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer treated with combination chemotherapy with or without irradiation. J Clin Oncol. Mar 1990;8(3):396-401. [Medline].

  46. Lassen U, Osterlind K, Hansen M, Dombernowsky P, Bergman B, Hansen HH. Long-term survival in small-cell lung cancer: posttreatment characteristics in patients surviving 5 to 18+ years--an analysis of 1,714 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol. May 1995;13(5):1215-20. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Table 1. 2008-2010 Estimates of New Cases of Lung Cancer and Estimates of Lung Cancer Deaths
Newly Diagnosed Cases of Diagnosed Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Deaths
2008 Estimates
Total (% of all cancers)215,020 (15%)161,840 (29%)
Men114, 69090,810
Women100,33071,030
2009 Estimates
Total (% of all cancers)219,440 (15%)159,390 (28%)
Men116,09088,900
Women103,35070,490
2010 Estimates
Total (% of all cancers)222,520 (15%)157,300 (28%)
Men116,75086,220
Women105,77071,080
Sources: American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2008,[15] 2009,[19] 2010.[20]
Table 2. Paraneoplastic Syndromes
Organ System Syndrome Mechanism Frequency
EndocrineSIADHAntidiuretic hormone5-10%
Ectopic secretion of ACTHAdrenocorticotropic hormone5%
Atrial natriuretic factor
NeurologicEaton-Lambert reverse myasthenic syndrome5-6%
Subacute cerebellar degeneration
Subacute sensory neuropathy
Limbic encephalopathyAnti-Hu, Anti-Yo antibodies
ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; SIADH = syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone.
Table 3. Commonly Used Chemotherapy Regimens in Small Cell Lung Cancer
Regimen Dose
“CAV” Regimen
Cyclophosphamide1000 mg/m2 IV day 1
Doxorubicin (Adriamycin)50 mg/m2 IV day 1
Vincristine2 mg IV
“PE” Regimen
Cisplatin25 mg/m2 IV days 1-3
Etoposide100 mg/m2 IV days 1-3
“CAVE” Regimen
Cyclophosphamide1000 mg/m2 IV day 1
Doxorubicin (Adriamycin)50 mg/m2 IV day 1
Vincristine1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1 (maximum 2 mg)
Etoposide100 mg/m2 IV day 1
“PEC” Regimen
Paclitaxel200 mg/m2 IV day 1
Etoposide50 mg/d PO alternating with



100 mg/d PO from days 1-10



CarboplatinAUC 6 IV day 1
Single-Agent Regimens
Topotecan1.5 mg/m2 IV day 1-5
Etoposide50 mg PO bid days 1-14
AUC = area under the concentration curve; bid = twice daily; IV = administered intravenously; PO = administered orally.
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.