Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Metastatic Cancer With Unknown Primary Site Treatment & Management

  • Author: Winston W Tan, MD, FACP; Chief Editor: Wafik S El-Deiry, MD, PhD  more...
 
Updated: Apr 01, 2016
 

Medical Care

The treatment of cancer of unknown primary origin continues to evolve.[25, 26] The most common scenario is a patient with progressive, metastatic adenocarcinoma with multiple organ involvement.[27] The treatment of this group of patients remains suboptimal.

Some favorable subsets have been identified that respond well to certain specific treatment strategies. These are discussed below.

See Cancer of Unknown Primary Treatment Protocols for summarized information.

Metastasis to cervical lymph nodes

A histologic diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma in the cervical nodes warrants a careful evaluation of the upper aerodigestive tract, including direct visualization of the hypopharynx, nasopharynx, larynx, and upper esophagus. Histologically, most of these tumors are squamous cell carcinomas, but adenocarcinoma, melanoma, or anaplastic tumors can also be seen in this location. In patients with squamous or undifferentiated carcinoma, tonsillectomies should be considered.[28] Cervical adenopathy can be the primary disease manifestation in 2-5% of patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region.

In the absence of localization of a primary site, aggressive local therapy is indicated. This may involve any of the following:

  • Radical radiation therapy with curative intent to the neck and possible site of origin
  • Preoperative radiation therapy followed by radical neck dissection
  • Radical neck dissection
  • Radical neck dissection followed by radiation to possible sites of origin

Five-year survival rates as high as 30-50% have been achieved with this approach.

The role of chemotherapy is debated. One randomized study showed an improved response rate and median survival with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil—based chemotherapy when compared to radiation alone. A single adenocarcinoma-involved lymph node in either the cervical or inguinal areas with no evidence of disease elsewhere may be managed with surgical excision alone and watchful expectation.[29] Radiation therapy to the involved and local fields may be provided as well. Combination therapy may be superior to monotherapy, with 5-year survival rates of 35% reported.

Patients with cervical node metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary have an overall survival comparable to that of patients with known primary. In a retrospective study of 89 patients cancer of unknown primary treated with curative intent at a single institution, Mistry et al showed that the overall 5-year and 8-year survival rates were 55% and 51%, respectively. All patients were treated with surgery, and 70 patients received more than 40 Gy postoperative radiotherapy.[30]

Isolated axillary adenopathy in women

Metastatic adenocarcinoma presenting as isolated axillary lymphadenopathy in women is usually a manifestation of an occult breast primary cancer.[4] Mastectomy specimens in this subset of patients have shown a previously undiagnosed breast primary tumor in 40-70% cases. Immunohistochemical stains for estrogen and progesterone receptor should be performed in this setting, as they may aid in diagnosis.

Modified radical mastectomy with axillary node dissection has been advocated. A study with 42 patients, however, showed improved survival with systemic chemotherapy and improved local control with breast and axillary radiation. When these patients are treated with local excision or as having primary breast cancer, 50% of patients achieve 2-10 year survival. Currently, management is based on the guidelines for stage II breast cancer.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis in women

Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis with adenocarcinoma have similarities with patients with ovarian cancer. They often have papillary histology with elevation of CA-125 and a good response to platinum-based chemotherapy, but a primary tumor is not revealed on exploratory laparotomy.

Metastatic melanoma to a single nodal site

Five percent of patients with malignant melanoma may present with nodal metastasis in the absence of a documented primary site. They should be treated with radical lymph node dissection. Survival, surprisingly, is slightly better than that for stage II melanoma in patients with a known primary site.

Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated carcinoma

One third of patients with cancer of unknown primary origin have poorly or undifferentiated carcinoma. A subpopulation of these can be potentially curable. This subgroup includes patients with lymphomas, germ cell tumors, or neuroendocrine tumors. The features that point toward a treatment-responsive tumor include the following:

  • Patient younger than 50 years
  • Midline distribution, with elevated levels of beta-HCG or AFP
  • Beta-HCG/AFP positive on immunohistochemistry
  • Neuroendocrine granules
  • Rapid tumor growth
  • Iso-chromosome 12p in midline tumors

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy regimens specific for germ cell tumors have been employed in these patients with a response rate of 63%, a complete response rate of 26%, and a 10-year survival rates of 16%.

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas

These tumors are characterized by positive histochemical stains for chromogranin or neuron-specific enolase. These patients often present with extensive liver or bone metastases. In a series of 29 patients, 19 were treated with intensive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and 6 others received doxorubicin-based combinations. Complete responses were achieved in 6 patients, and 4 of these patients were alive 19-100 months after diagnosis.[24]

Inguinal node metastasis

Metastatic carcinoma in inguinal nodes from an unknown site can be found in 1-3.5% of patients. Squamous cell histology in this area is usually metastatic from the genital/anorectal area. The anorectal area should be carefully inspected in both sexes. Vulvar, vaginal, and cervical examination in women and penile examination in men is warranted. Treatment can involve groin dissection alone or with radiation and chemotherapy. In some patients, local excision with or without radiation may be adequate.[31]

Cancer of unknown primary origin in unselected patients

The results from the favorable patient subsets do not apply to most of the patients with cancer of unknown primary origin. The most effective chemotherapy regimens for this group of patients involve combination therapy with a platinum compound (cisplatin or carboplatin) and a taxane (preferably paclitaxel). This combination gives a response rate of about 12-26% and a median survival of 5-7 months. Triple drug therapy does not appear to offer any additional benefit.

Docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy was found to be convenient, safe and effective outpatient palliative treatment for CUP. In a phase II cycle, Pentheroudakis et al treated 47 patients with CUP with sequential 30-minute infusions of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the concentration time-curve (AUC) of 5 (30 min each) every 3 weeks.  A median of six cycles were given, response rate was 32% (46% for favorable risk, 17% for unfavorable risk), and granulocyte colony stimulating factor support was used in a third of the patients. Toxicity was mild including grade 3-4 neutropenia (26%), febrile neutropenia (7%), and severe nonhematologic side effects in fewer than 8% of patients. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.5 and 16.2 months, respectively. (Survival in the favorable risk was 22.6 months; visceral metastases had poor median survival 5.3 months.)[32]

Patients in whom combination therapy fails may benefit from single-agent treatment with gemcitabine with median time to progression of 5 months. A phase II clinical trial with bevacizumab and erlotinib reported a median survival of 7-8 months with 33% of patients alive at 1 year.[33]

A subsequent trial found that empiric treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and erlotinib is effective and well tolerated as first-line treatment for patients with CUP. Major responses to treatment occcurred in 32 of 60 patients (53%), and an additional 18 patients had stable disease. The median progression-free survival time was 8 months, with 38% of patients progression free at 1 year; the 2-year overall survival rate was 27%.[34]

Future directions

Newer agents, such as sorafenib, bevacizumab, antineoplaston, CS-1008 (humanized anti-CD-5 antibody), BMS-690514, and ZD1839, are currently being tested in various clinical trials. Also, combinations of older drugs such as capecitabine, carboplatin with weekly paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin with capecitabine are being evaluated in this group of patients.

Insights into the molecular biology of CUP are needed for the development of targeted therapeutic approaches to the treatment of these patients.

 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Winston W Tan, MD, FACP Associate Professor of Medicine, Mayo Medical School; Consultant and Person-in-Charge of Genitourinary Oncology-Medical Oncology, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville; Vice Chairman of Education, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida

Winston W Tan, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hematology, Texas Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Philippine Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Nasir Shahab, MD 

Nasir Shahab, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hematology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Surabhi Amar, MD Fellow, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

Surabhi Amar, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Hematology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Benjamin Movsas, MD 

Benjamin Movsas, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Radium Society, American Society for Radiation Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Wafik S El-Deiry, MD, PhD Rose Dunlap Professor of Medicine, Chief, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center

Wafik S El-Deiry, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society for Clinical Investigation, American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Robert C Shepard, MD, FACP Associate Professor of Medicine in Hematology and Oncology at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Vice President of Scientific Affairs, Therapeutic Expertise, Oncology, at PRA International

Robert C Shepard, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for Physician Leadership, European Society for Medical Oncology, Association of Clinical Research Professionals, American Federation for Clinical Research, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, American Medical Informatics Association, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research, American Medical Association, American Society of Hematology, Massachusetts Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP† Former Nellie B Smith Chair of Oncology Emeritus, Former Director, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Former Deputy Director, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

References
  1. Greco FA, Hainsworth JD. Cancer of Unknown Primary Site. De Vita VT Jr, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, eds. De Vita, Hellman, and Rosenberg's Cancer: Principles and Practice. 10th Ed. Philadelphia PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. 1720-37.

  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. American Cancer Society. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/index. Accessed: March 31, 2016.

  3. Hess KR, Abbruzzese MC, Lenzi R, et al. Classification and regression tree analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with unknown primary carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Nov. 5(11):3403-10. [Medline].

  4. Copeland EM, McBride CM. Axillary metastases from unknown primary sites. Ann Surg. 1973 Jul. 178(1):25-7. [Medline].

  5. Merson M, Andreola S, Galimberti V, et al. Breast carcinoma presenting as axillary metastases without evidence of a primary tumor. Cancer. 1992 Jul 15. 70(2):504-8. [Medline].

  6. Davidson BJ, Spiro RH, Patel S, et al. Cervical metastases of occult origin: the impact of combined modality therapy. Am J Surg. 1994 Nov. 168(5):395-9. [Medline].

  7. [Guideline] Fizazi K, Greco FA, Pavlidis N, Daugaard G, Oien K, Pentheroudakis G, et al. Cancers of unknown primary site: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep. 26 Suppl 5:v133-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Levine MN, Drummond MF, Labelle RJ. Cost-effectiveness in the diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of unknown primary origin. CMAJ. 1985 Nov 15. 133(10):977-87. [Medline].

  9. Maisey MN, Ellam SV. Investigating the adenocarcinoma of unknown origin (ACUP): a cost benefit analysis. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1984. 32(1):57-61. [Medline].

  10. Schapira DV, Jarrett AR. The need to consider survival, outcome, and expense when evaluating and treating patients with unknown primary carcinoma. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Oct 23. 155(19):2050-4. [Medline].

  11. Kole AC, Nieweg OE, Pruim J, et al. Detection of unknown occult primary tumors using positron emission tomography. Cancer. 1998 Mar 15. 82(6):1160-6. [Medline].

  12. Coassin M, Ebrahimi KB, O'Brien JM, Stewart JM. Optical coherence tomography for retinal metastasis with unknown primary tumor. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Dec 8. 42:e110-3. [Medline].

  13. Molina R, Bosch X, Auge JM, Filella X, Escudero JM, Molina V, et al. Utility of serum tumor markers as an aid in the differential diagnosis of patients with clinical suspicion of cancer and in patients with cancer of unknown primary site. Tumour Biol. 2011 Dec 9. [Medline].

  14. Hainsworth JD, Rubin MS, Spigel DR, Boccia RV, Raby S, Quinn R, et al. Molecular Gene Expression Profiling to Predict the Tissue of Origin and Direct Site-Specific Therapy in Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: A Prospective Trial of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 1. [Medline].

  15. [Guideline] National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Occult Primary (Cancer of Unknown Primary [CUP]) Version 2. 2016. NCCN. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/occult.pdf. Accessed: March 31, 2016.

  16. Meleth S, Whitehead N, Swinson T, Lux L. Technology assessment on genetic testing or molecular pathology testing of cancers with unknown primary site to determine origin. Technology Assessment Report. RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). February 20, 2013. Available at http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/DeterminationProcess/downloads/id90TA.pdf.

  17. Hainsworth JD, Rubin MS, Spigel DR, Boccia RV, Raby S, Quinn R, et al. Molecular gene expression profiling to predict the tissue of origin and direct site-specific therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a prospective trial of the Sarah Cannon research institute. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 10. 31 (2):217-23. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  18. Ariza A, Balañá C, Concha Á, Hitt R, Homet B, Matilla A, et al. Update on the diagnosis of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) origin. Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Jul. 13(7):434-41. [Medline].

  19. Battifora H. Recent progress in the immunohistochemistry of solid tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1984 Nov. 1(4):251-71. [Medline].

  20. Motzer RJ, Rodriguez E, Reuter VE, et al. Molecular and cytogenetic studies in the diagnosis of patients with poorly differentiated carcinomas of unknown primary site. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan. 13(1):274-82. [Medline].

  21. Feinmesser R, Miyazaki I, Cheung R, et a;. Diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by DNA amplification of tissue obtained by fine-needle aspiration. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 2. 326(1):17-21. [Medline].

  22. Bosl GJ, Ilson DH, Rodriguez E, et al. Clinical relevance of the i(12p) marker chromosome in germ cell tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Mar 2. 86(5):349-55. [Medline].

  23. Sandberg AA, Meloni AM, Suijkerbuijk RF. Reviews of chromosome studies in urological tumors. III. Cytogenetics and genes in testicular tumors. J Urol. 1996 May. 155(5):1531-56. [Medline].

  24. Garrow GC, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD. Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site. Semin Oncol. 1993 Jun. 20(3):287-91. [Medline].

  25. Hainsworth JD, Greco FA. Treatment of patients with cancer of an unknown primary site. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 22. 329(4):257-63. [Medline].

  26. Pavlidis N, Briasoulis E, Hainsworth J, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary. Eur J Cancer. 2003 Sep. 39(14):1990-2005. [Medline].

  27. Moertel CG, Reitemeier RJ, Schutt AJ, et al. Treatment of the patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown origin. Cancer. 1972 Dec. 30(6):1469-72. [Medline].

  28. Righi PD, Sofferman RA. Screening unilateral tonsillectomy in the unknown primary. Laryngoscope. 1995 May. 105(5 Pt 1):548-50. [Medline].

  29. Guarischi A, Keane TJ, Elhakim T. Metastatic inguinal nodes from an unknown primary neoplasm. A review of 56 cases. Cancer. 1987 Feb 1. 59(3):572-7. [Medline].

  30. Mistry RC, Qureshi SS, Talole SD, et al. Cervical lymph node metastases of squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary: Outcomes and patterns of failure. Indian J Cancer. 2008 Apr-Jun. 45(2):54-8. [Medline].

  31. Guarischi A, Keane TJ, Elhakim T. Metastatic inguinal nodes from an unknown primary neoplasm. A review of 56 cases. Cancer. 1987 Feb 1. 59 (3):572-7. [Medline].

  32. Pentheroudakis G, Briasoulis E, Kalofonos HP, Fountzilas G, Economopoulos T, Samelis G, et al. Docetaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy as outpatient palliative therapy in carcinoma of unknown primary: a multicentre Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group phase II study. Acta Oncol. 2008. 47 (6):1148-55. [Medline].

  33. Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Farley C, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab and erlotinib in carcinomas of unknown primary site: the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1. 25(13):1747-52. [Medline].

  34. Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Thompson DS, Murphy PB, Lane CM, Waterhouse DM, et al. Paclitaxel/carboplatin plus bevacizumab/erlotinib in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Oncologist. 2009 Dec. 14 (12):1189-97. [Medline].

  35. Montero AJ, Varadhachary GR, Abbruzzese JL. Unknown Primary Carcinomas. Kantarjian HN, Koller CM, Wolff RA. MD Anderson Manual of Medical Oncology. McGraw Hill; 2006. 937-954.

  36. Pavlidis N, Fizazi K. Cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005 Jun. 54(3):243-50. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
CT scan of neck with contrast. The arrows indicate metastatic lymphadenopathy. Image courtesy of Head and Neck Cancer-Multidisciplinary Approach, Davidson, BJ.
Table. Immunohistochemical markers for cancers of unknown primary
Primary Marker Primary Tumor Type Additional Markers
CK7- /CK 20 + Colorectal cancer and merkel cell carcinoma CEA and CDX-2  (for GI malignancy)
CK 7 +/CK 20 - Lung,breast, thyroid, endometrial, cervical, pancreas, and cholangiocarcinoma TTF-1 (lung, thyroid)



ER, PR (breast)



GCDFP-15 (gynecologic)



CK- 19 (pancreas)



Ck+7/ CK 20+ Urothelial, ovarian, pancreas, cholangiocarcinoma Urothelin (genitourinary) 



WT-1 (ovarian, mesothelial)



CK = cytokeratin; CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen; TTF1 = thyroid transcription factor 1; ER = estrogen receptor; PR = progesterone receptor; GCDFP-15  = gross cystic disease fluid protein–15; WT-1 = Wilms tumor gene 1; PSA = prostate specific antigen
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.