Renal Transitional Cell Carcinoma 

  • Author: Bagi RP Jana, MD; Chief Editor: Jules E Harris, MD   more...
 
Updated: May 8, 2012
 

Background

Renal transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), or renal urothelial carcinoma (UC), is a malignant tumor arising from the transitional (urothelial) epithelial cells lining the urinary tract from the renal calyces to the ureteral orifice. UC is the most common tumor of the renal pelvis. Over 70,000 cases of bladder cancer are diagnosed annually in the United States. Upper urinary tract TCC is estimated to occur in 5% of all urothelial cancers and in fewer than 10% of renal tumors. Evidence indicates that the frequency of upper urinary tract malignancies is increasing.[1]

Surgical intervention is the main form of radical treatment for localized disease. Medical therapy usually is administered as an adjuvant to surgical therapy or to patients in whom surgical treatment is contraindicated (eg, because of poor general condition or the presence of advanced disease). The role of radiation therapy in the management of upper urinary tract TCC is not well defined.

For patient education resources, see the Kidneys and Urinary System Center, as well as Blood in the Urine.

Next

Pathophysiology

TCC accounts for more than 90% of renal pelvic tumors; other cancer types seen include squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma. The predominant histologic pattern of UC is a papillary tumor with stratified, nonkeratinizing epithelium supported on a thin fibrovascular core.

TCC of the upper urinary tract is histologically identical to urinary bladder cancer. These 2 malignancies share the same risk factors and can occur as a part of “field cancerization,” which results from exposure of urothelium to carcinogens excreted by or activated in the urine. Hence, upper urinary tract urothelial tumors may be multifocal, and in 2-10% of cases, they are bilateral as well.

Patients with upper urinary tract urothelial tumors are at risk for the development of bladder tumors, which has an estimated incidence of 20-48%. Bladder cancer usually appears within 5 years. Patients with primary bladder cancer develop upper urinary tract UC in 2-4% of cases. The frequency of upper urinary tract UC may reach 21% in patients with bladder carcinoma in situ (CIS) and in those with certain occupational exposures.

Previous
Next

Etiology

The exact cause of upper urinary tract TCC is not known; however, several risk factors have been identified.

Workers in the chemical, petrochemical, aniline dye, and plastics industries, as well as those exposed to coal, coke, tar, and asphalt, are at increased risk for renal pelvis and ureteral tumors.

Cigarette smoking appears to be the most significant acquired risk factor for upper urinary tract UC. It is suggested that 70% of upper urinary tract urothelial tumors in men and 40% of those in women can be attributed to smoking.

Balkan endemic nephropathy, a chronic tubulointerstitial disorder, seems to be another risk factor for upper urinary tract urothelial tumors. This disease is confined to the countries that are located along the Danube River and its tributaries. Dietary exposure to aristolochic acid has been identified as a significant risk factor for Balkan nephropathy and subsequent TCC.[2]

Analgesic abuse is a risk factor; a combination of phenacetin use and papillary necrosis results in a 20-fold increase in risk for renal urothelial tumors. Phenacetin was removed from the US market in 1983, and phenacetin-related upper urinary tract UC has become vanishingly rare.[3]

Chronic bacterial infection with urinary calculus and obstruction may predispose to the development of urothelial cancer. SCC is the most common entity in these cases. Schistosomiasis also may predispose to SCC.

The chemotherapy drugs cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are implicated in the development of urothelial cancers in the upper and lower urinary tract, particularly after drug-induced hemorrhagic cystitis.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

United States statistics

According to American Cancer Society, an estimated 70,980 bladder cancers and 57,760 kidney cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2009. Primary renal pelvis and ureteric malignancies, on the other hand, are much less common; it is estimated that 2,270 renal pelvic and ureteric cancers will be diagnosed and 790 patients will die of this disease in 2009.[4] Deaths from urothelial malignancies have been decreasing since 1995.

International statistics

Worldwide statistics vary and are inaccurate, in that renal pelvis tumors are not reported separately. The highest incidence is found in Balkan countries (eg, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, and Serbia), where UCs account for 40% of all renal cancers and are bilateral in 10% of cases.

Age-, sex-, and race-related demographics

Renal pelvis tumors rarely occur before age 40 years. The peak incidence is in the 60- to 70-year age group. Men are affected approximately 2 times as frequently as women are. The incidence is slightly higher in African Americans than in other races; reported rates are similar among white Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Renal pelvic tumors are less common in Asian Americans.

Previous
Next

Prognosis

Renal UC is uniformly fatal unless it is treated. In a multicenter study of 1363 patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma who were treated with radical nephroureterectomy, the 5-year cancer-specific survival probability was approximately 73%.[5]

Tumor stage is the most important prognostic factor for upper urinary tract UC. Survival correlates closely with tumor stage. The TNM staging system developed by the International Union Against cancer (UICC) for upper urinary tract carcinomas is the most comprehensive (see Staging).

Tumor grade is another predictor of prognosis (see Histologic Findings). Tumor grade usually follows tumor stage, and patients with high-grade carcinomas have more advanced (ie, high-stage) disease. Stage and grade correlate in as many as 83% of cases, though stage remains a more accurate predictor of prognosis.

Stage T3 renal tumors have a better prognosis than ureteral tumors do. A retrospective study by Park et al found that in patients with stage pT3 disease, 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 77.5% for renal pelvic tumors invading the renal parenchyma versus 49.7% for tumors invading peripelvic or periureteral fat; 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for the 2 tumor types were 75.6% and 32.0%, respectively.[6] The authors suggested that the thickness of the renal parenchyma may protect against local tumor spread.

The 5-year survival rate after radical surgery depends on the disease stage, as follows:

  • Stages Tis, Ta, or T1 – 91%
  • Stage T2 – 43%
  • Stages T3, T4, N1, or N2 – 23%
  • Stages N3 or M1 – 0%

TCC may develop in the contralateral kidney after radical nephroureterectomy. In a European multicenter dataset of patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic TCC, a history of bladder TCC preceding the upper urinary tract TCC was the only predictor of TCC recurrence in the contralateral upper tract.[7] The 5-year probabilities of freedom from TCC in the contralateral upper tract TCC were as follows:

  • 96.6% for patients with de novo upper-tract disease
  • 91.1% for those having prior non–muscle-invasive bladder TCC
  • 55.3% for those with prior muscle-invasive bladder TCC

The 5-year survival rate in selected patients after conservative surgery is reported to be 70-90%.

Recurrences in the remaining urothelium after conservative treatment are relatively frequent because of the multifocal nature of TCCs. Ipsilateral recurrence rates may reach 25-50%. Most low-grade recurrences can be treated with repeat conservative excision. The 5-year survival rates in these patients with low-grade, low-stage disease can approach 100%.

The prognosis is poor for patients with advanced SCC.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Bagi RP Jana, MD  Assistant Professor, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

Bagi RP Jana, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Cancer Society, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and Southwest Oncology Group

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Kush Sachdeva, MD  Southern Oncology and Hematology Associates, South Jersey Healthcare, Fox Chase Cancer Center Partner

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jules E Harris, MD  Clinical Professor of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Arizona Cancer Center

Jules E Harris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Immunologists, American Society of Hematology, and Central Society for Clinical Research

Disclosure: GlobeImmune Salary Consulting

Additional Contributors

Georgi Guruli, MD, PhD Consulting Staff, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University Hospital; Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Wendy Hu, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Hematology/Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Huntington Memorial Medical Center

Wendy Hu, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Physicians, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Hematology, and Physicians for Social Responsibility

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Badrinath R Konety, MD Associate Professor, Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP Nellie B Smith Chair of Oncology Emeritus, Director, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Deputy Director, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References
  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. Jul-Aug 2009;59(4):225-49. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  2. Grollman AP, Shibutani S, Moriya M, Miller F, Wu L, Moll U, et al. Aristolochic acid and the etiology of endemic (Balkan) nephropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul 17 2007;104(29):12129-34. [Medline].

  3. Colin P, Koenig P, Ouzzane A, Berthon N, Villers A, Biserte J, et al. Environmental factors involved in carcinogenesis of urothelial cell carcinomas of the upper urinary tract. BJU Int. Nov 2009;104(10):1436-40. [Medline].

  4. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf. Accessed December 12, 2009.

  5. Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E, et al. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer. Mar 15 2009;115(6):1224-33. [Medline].

  6. Park J, Ha SH, Min GE, Song C, Hong B, Hong JH, et al. The protective role of renal parenchyma as a barrier to local tumor spread of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma and its impact on patient survival. J Urol. Sep 2009;182(3):894-9. [Medline].

  7. Novara G, De Marco V, Dalpiaz O, Galfano A, Bouygues V, Gardiman M, et al. Independent predictors of contralateral metachronous upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma after nephroureterectomy: multi-institutional dataset from three European centers. Int J Urol. Feb 2009;16(2):187-91. [Medline].

  8. Vikram R, Sandler CM, Ng CS. Imaging and staging of transitional cell carcinoma: part 2, upper urinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2009;192(6):1488-93. [Medline].

  9. Jeong YB, Kim HJ. Is It Transitional Cell Carcinoma or Renal Cell Carcinoma on Computed Tomography Image?. Urology. Dec 21 2011;[Medline].

  10. Rastinehad AR, Ost MC, Vanderbrink BA, Greenberg KL, El-Hakim A, Marcovich R, et al. A 20-year experience with percutaneous resection of upper tract transitional carcinoma: is there an oncologic benefit with adjuvant bacillus Calmette Guérin therapy?. Urology. Jan 2009;73(1):27-31. [Medline].

  11. Demery ME, Thézenas S, Pouessel D, Culine S. Systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium and impaired renal function. Anticancer Drugs. Feb 2012;23(2):143-8. [Medline].

  12. Pak RW, Moskowitz EJ, Bagley DH. What is the cost of maintaining a kidney in upper-tract transitional-cell carcinoma? An objective analysis of cost and survival. J Endourol. Mar 2009;23(3):341-6. [Medline].

  13. Straub J, Strittmatter F, Karl A, Stief CG, Tritschler S. Ureterorenoscopic biopsy and urinary cytology according to the 2004 WHO classification underestimate tumor grading in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. Jan 31 2012;[Medline].

  14. Hsueh TY, Huang YH, Chiu AW, et al. A comparison of the clinical outcome between open and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. BJU Int. Oct 2004;94(6):798-801.

  15. Kawauchi A, Fujito A, Ukimura O, et al. Hand assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy: comparison with the open procedure. J Urol. Mar 2003;169(3):890-4; discussion 894. [Medline].

  16. Ong AM, Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP. Trocar site recurrence after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. J Urol. Oct 2003;170(4 Pt 1):1301. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
CT scan with contrast, vascular phase. Mass can be seen in left renal pelvis (black arrows). Patient underwent nephroureterectomy. Tumor was high-grade urothelial carcinoma invading subepithelial tissue (stage T1) and measuring 7.5 × 3.2 × 3 cm.
CT scan, delayed phase. Enhancing mass can be visualized in left renal pelvis (white arrows).
Retrograde pyelography. Filling defect can be seen in left renal pelvis and lower calyx (black arrows). Patient underwent left nephroureterectomy. Tumor was low-grade urothelial carcinoma measuring 2.5 × 2 × 1 cm.
Right retrograde pyelogram demonstrates large filling defect in midureter due to transitional cell carcinoma (large arrow). Note characteristic appearance of radiographic contrast material just distal to obstruction (small arrow), which gives rise to so-called goblet sign. Contrast is also visible beyond partially obstructed segment of ureter in renal pelvis and collecting system.
Pathology specimen shows urothelial tumor of renal pelvis (white arrows).
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.