Renal Transitional Cell Carcinoma Workup

  • Author: Bagi RP Jana, MD; Chief Editor: Jules E Harris, MD   more...
 
Updated: May 8, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

Urinalysis and urine culture are indicated. The presence of microscopic hematuria suggests urinary tract tumors, which must be ruled out even if the hematuria resolves. The presence of more than 2-5 red blood cells (RBCs) per high-power field (HPF) is considered sufficient to warrant further investigation to rule out upper urinary tract renal transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Evaluate for urinary tract infections.

Cytologic studies may be helpful. Voided-urine cytology is a convenient and noninvasive method of diagnosis, but it is subjective and lacks the necessary sensitivity for diagnosing upper urinary tract urothelial tumors, especially low-grade neoplasms. Fluoroscopically guided brush biopsy increases the diagnostic accuracy to 80-90%.

Next

Intravenous Urography

In the past, intravenous urography (IVU) was the most commonly used diagnostic method for the evaluation of patients with hematuria in the past. In current practice, however, it is increasingly being replaced by computed tomography (CT) urography.[8]

Filling defects in the upper urinary tract can be demonstrated in 50-75% of patients. Other common causes of filling defects (eg, nonopaque stones, blood clots, papillary necrosis with sloughing, and fungus balls) should be ruled out. In 13-31% of cases, the affected kidney may not be adequately visualizable.

Previous
Next

Computed Tomography

CT scanning is useful in the diagnosis and staging of renal urothelial tumors (see the images below). It can distinguish between radiolucent renal stones and upper urinary tract urothelial tumors, in that stones appear opaque on CT scans (>200 Hounsfield units [HU] for uric acid stones versus 60-80 HU for tumors).[9]

CT scan with contrast, vascular phase. Mass can beCT scan with contrast, vascular phase. Mass can be seen in left renal pelvis (black arrows). Patient underwent nephroureterectomy. Tumor was high-grade urothelial carcinoma invading subepithelial tissue (stage T1) and measuring 7.5 × 3.2 × 3 cm. CT scan, delayed phase. Enhancing mass can be visuCT scan, delayed phase. Enhancing mass can be visualized in left renal pelvis (white arrows).

CT scanning also can be used for determining the local extent the tumor and the presence of distant metastases, but it is of limited value in predicting the pathologic stage of upper urinary tract urothelial tumors (it is accurate in 43-77% of cases).

Previous
Next

Cystoscopy and Ureteroscopy

Cystoscopy may help to localize bleeding site (left or right) and rule out or confirm concomitant bladder lesions. Retrograde pyelography (RPG) is especially useful when the kidney cannot be visualized by means of IVU or when renal insufficiency or severe contrast allergy prevents the performance of IVU. A properly performed RPG is confirmatory in approximately 85% of cases (see the images below).

Retrograde pyelography. Filling defect can be seenRetrograde pyelography. Filling defect can be seen in left renal pelvis and lower calyx (black arrows). Patient underwent left nephroureterectomy. Tumor was low-grade urothelial carcinoma measuring 2.5 × 2 × 1 cm. Right retrograde pyelogram demonstrates large fillRight retrograde pyelogram demonstrates large filling defect in midureter due to transitional cell carcinoma (large arrow). Note characteristic appearance of radiographic contrast material just distal to obstruction (small arrow), which gives rise to so-called goblet sign. Contrast is also visible beyond partially obstructed segment of ureter in renal pelvis and collecting system.

Ureteroscopy is routinely used in the diagnosis of renal pelvic tumors. The correct diagnosis can be achieved in 80-90% of cases. The gross appearance usually suffices for the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UC); however, a biopsy should be obtained if necessary.

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Most TCCs are papillary. They may be single or multiple. See image below.

Pathology specimen shows urothelial tumor of renalPathology specimen shows urothelial tumor of renal pelvis (white arrows).

Flat carcinoma in situ (CIS) also may develop in the renal pelvis. CIS may be found in the distal ureter of 20-35% of patients who undergo cystectomy for bladder cancer. The presence of CIS warrants further resection of the ureter until a healthy ureteral segment is reached.

UCs can be characterized according to the degree of nuclear anaplasia. Low-grade tumors may have a thin fibrovascular core that is covered by several layers of cytologically benign urothelium, or they may be more broad-based, with hyperplastic urothelium. High-grade tumors usually are solid masses of large cells with irregular nuclei. Tumor grade is an important predictor of prognosis.

Previous
Next

Staging

The TNM staging system of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) is used to stage upper urinary tract carcinomas.

Primary tumor (T) classifications include the following:

  • TX – Primary tumor is occult and cannot be assessed
  • T0 – No evidence of primary tumor
  • Ta – Papillary noninvasive carcinoma
  • Tis – Carcinoma in situ
  • T1 – Carcinoma involves subepithelial connective tissue
  • T2 – Carcinoma invades the muscularis
  • T3 – Carcinoma invades beyond muscularis into periureteric or peripelvic fat or into renal parenchyma
  • T4 – Carcinoma invades adjacent organs or extends through the kidney into perinephric fat

Regional lymph node (N) classifications include the following:

  • NX – Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
  • N0 – No regional lymph node metastasis
  • N1 – Metastasis in a single lymph node, 2 cm or less in greatest dimension
  • N2 – Metastasis in a single lymph node 2-5 cm in greatest dimension; or multiple metastatic lymph nodes, none more than 5 cm in greatest dimension
  • N3 – Metastasis in a lymph node more than 5 cm in greatest dimension

Distant metastasis (M) classifications include the following:

  • MX – Presence of distant metastasis cannot be assessed
  • M0 – No distant metastasis
  • M1 – Distant metastasis
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Bagi RP Jana, MD  Assistant Professor, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

Bagi RP Jana, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Cancer Society, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and Southwest Oncology Group

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Kush Sachdeva, MD  Southern Oncology and Hematology Associates, South Jersey Healthcare, Fox Chase Cancer Center Partner

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jules E Harris, MD  Clinical Professor of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Arizona Cancer Center

Jules E Harris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Immunologists, American Society of Hematology, and Central Society for Clinical Research

Disclosure: GlobeImmune Salary Consulting

Additional Contributors

Georgi Guruli, MD, PhD Consulting Staff, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University Hospital; Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Wendy Hu, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Hematology/Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Huntington Memorial Medical Center

Wendy Hu, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Physicians, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Hematology, and Physicians for Social Responsibility

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Badrinath R Konety, MD Associate Professor, Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP Nellie B Smith Chair of Oncology Emeritus, Director, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Deputy Director, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Cancer Research, American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References
  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. Jul-Aug 2009;59(4):225-49. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  2. Grollman AP, Shibutani S, Moriya M, Miller F, Wu L, Moll U, et al. Aristolochic acid and the etiology of endemic (Balkan) nephropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul 17 2007;104(29):12129-34. [Medline].

  3. Colin P, Koenig P, Ouzzane A, Berthon N, Villers A, Biserte J, et al. Environmental factors involved in carcinogenesis of urothelial cell carcinomas of the upper urinary tract. BJU Int. Nov 2009;104(10):1436-40. [Medline].

  4. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf. Accessed December 12, 2009.

  5. Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E, et al. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer. Mar 15 2009;115(6):1224-33. [Medline].

  6. Park J, Ha SH, Min GE, Song C, Hong B, Hong JH, et al. The protective role of renal parenchyma as a barrier to local tumor spread of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma and its impact on patient survival. J Urol. Sep 2009;182(3):894-9. [Medline].

  7. Novara G, De Marco V, Dalpiaz O, Galfano A, Bouygues V, Gardiman M, et al. Independent predictors of contralateral metachronous upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma after nephroureterectomy: multi-institutional dataset from three European centers. Int J Urol. Feb 2009;16(2):187-91. [Medline].

  8. Vikram R, Sandler CM, Ng CS. Imaging and staging of transitional cell carcinoma: part 2, upper urinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2009;192(6):1488-93. [Medline].

  9. Jeong YB, Kim HJ. Is It Transitional Cell Carcinoma or Renal Cell Carcinoma on Computed Tomography Image?. Urology. Dec 21 2011;[Medline].

  10. Rastinehad AR, Ost MC, Vanderbrink BA, Greenberg KL, El-Hakim A, Marcovich R, et al. A 20-year experience with percutaneous resection of upper tract transitional carcinoma: is there an oncologic benefit with adjuvant bacillus Calmette Guérin therapy?. Urology. Jan 2009;73(1):27-31. [Medline].

  11. Demery ME, Thézenas S, Pouessel D, Culine S. Systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium and impaired renal function. Anticancer Drugs. Feb 2012;23(2):143-8. [Medline].

  12. Pak RW, Moskowitz EJ, Bagley DH. What is the cost of maintaining a kidney in upper-tract transitional-cell carcinoma? An objective analysis of cost and survival. J Endourol. Mar 2009;23(3):341-6. [Medline].

  13. Straub J, Strittmatter F, Karl A, Stief CG, Tritschler S. Ureterorenoscopic biopsy and urinary cytology according to the 2004 WHO classification underestimate tumor grading in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. Jan 31 2012;[Medline].

  14. Hsueh TY, Huang YH, Chiu AW, et al. A comparison of the clinical outcome between open and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. BJU Int. Oct 2004;94(6):798-801.

  15. Kawauchi A, Fujito A, Ukimura O, et al. Hand assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy: comparison with the open procedure. J Urol. Mar 2003;169(3):890-4; discussion 894. [Medline].

  16. Ong AM, Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP. Trocar site recurrence after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. J Urol. Oct 2003;170(4 Pt 1):1301. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
CT scan with contrast, vascular phase. Mass can be seen in left renal pelvis (black arrows). Patient underwent nephroureterectomy. Tumor was high-grade urothelial carcinoma invading subepithelial tissue (stage T1) and measuring 7.5 × 3.2 × 3 cm.
CT scan, delayed phase. Enhancing mass can be visualized in left renal pelvis (white arrows).
Retrograde pyelography. Filling defect can be seen in left renal pelvis and lower calyx (black arrows). Patient underwent left nephroureterectomy. Tumor was low-grade urothelial carcinoma measuring 2.5 × 2 × 1 cm.
Right retrograde pyelogram demonstrates large filling defect in midureter due to transitional cell carcinoma (large arrow). Note characteristic appearance of radiographic contrast material just distal to obstruction (small arrow), which gives rise to so-called goblet sign. Contrast is also visible beyond partially obstructed segment of ureter in renal pelvis and collecting system.
Pathology specimen shows urothelial tumor of renal pelvis (white arrows).
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.