eMedicine Specialties > Perioperative Care > Perioperative Care

Perioperative Pulmonary Management

Author: Mark A Yoder, MD, Assistant Professor, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago
Coauthor(s): Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC, Professor and Head, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Site Director, Respiratory Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Mar 11, 2009

Background

Postoperative pulmonary complications contribute significantly to overall perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. Such complications account for about 25% of deaths occurring within 6 days of surgery. The frequency rate of these complications varies from 5-70%. This wide range is due to variations among studies in the definition of postoperative pulmonary complications, as well as variability in patient- and procedure-related factors.

The goal of perioperative pulmonary management is to identify patients at high risk of significant postoperative pulmonary complications, so that appropriate interventions can be provided to minimize that risk. In most cases, even in high-risk patients, the procedure can be performed safely as planned, but occasionally postponement, modification, or cancellation are warranted.

One of the more comprehensive lists of postoperative pulmonary complications includes fever (due to microatelectasis), cough, dyspnea, bronchospasm, hypoxemia, atelectasis, hypercapnia, adverse reaction to a pulmonary medication, pleural effusion, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and ventilatory failure.1 Such a broad definition risks including complications that have no clinical significance. Most investigators thus define a postoperative pulmonary complication as an abnormality that produces identifiable disease or dysfunction, is clinically significant, and adversely affects the clinical course.

Image in a 49-year-old woman with pneumococcal pn...

Image in a 49-year-old woman with pneumococcal pneumonia. The chest radiograph reveals a left lower lobe opacity with pleural effusion.

Image in a 49-year-old woman with pneumococcal pn...

Image in a 49-year-old woman with pneumococcal pneumonia. The chest radiograph reveals a left lower lobe opacity with pleural effusion.


Deep sulcus sign in a supine patient in the ICU. ...

Deep sulcus sign in a supine patient in the ICU. The pneumothorax is subpulmonic.

Deep sulcus sign in a supine patient in the ICU. ...

Deep sulcus sign in a supine patient in the ICU. The pneumothorax is subpulmonic.


Determining which complications fit this definition is challenging, but likely included are: atelectasis, infection (eg, bronchitis, pneumonia), prolonged mechanical ventilation and respiratory failure, exacerbation of an underlying chronic lung disease, and bronchospasm.  When such a definition is employed, postoperative pulmonary complications prolong the hospital stay by an average of 1-2 weeks, and are likewise associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

The risk of postoperative complications varies with the type of surgery being performed.  Pulmonary complications occur much more often than cardiac complications in patients undergoing elective surgery to the thorax and upper abdomen. Operations at sites farther from the diaphragm are associated with a much lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Preoperative evaluation for patients undergoing lung resection (ie, for lung cancer) differs considerably from that for those undergoing nonresectional surgery.

Postoperative pulmonary complications are also more common in patients with preexisting lung disease, medical comorbidities, poor nutritional status, overall poor health, and in those who smoke. Not all of these risk factors are modifiable, although strategies exist to reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications even among high-risk patients.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Lung and Airway Center and Circulatory Problems Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Pulmonary Embolism, Bronchitis, Bacterial Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Deep Vein Thrombosis (Blood Clot in the Leg, DVT).

Perioperative Pulmonary Physiology

Respiratory effects of general anesthesia

Anesthetic agents are associated with marked alterations in respiratory drive. Such agents cause a diminished response to both hypercapnia and hypoxemia. In combination with neuromuscular blockers, anesthetic agents cause diaphragm and chest wall relaxation, which results in a marked reduction in the functional reserve capacity and, thereby, thoracic volume.

This decrease in lung volume promotes atelectasis in the dependent lung regions and persists for more than 24 hours in 50% of patients. Consequently, arterial hypoxemia occurs from ventilation-perfusion (V-Q) mismatching and increased shunt fraction.

Postoperative respiratory physiology in upper abdominal and thoracic surgery

Thoracic and upper abdominal surgery is associated with a reduction in vital capacity by 50% and in functional residual capacity by 30%. Diaphragmatic dysfunction, postoperative pain, and splinting cause these changes.

Following upper abdominal surgery, patients shift to a breathing pattern with which ribcage excursions and abdominal expiratory muscle activities increase. This shift is attributed to decreased central nervous system (CNS) output to the phrenic nerves, thus inhibiting diaphragmatic stimulation. A reflex mechanism arising from the sympathetic, vagal, or splanchnic receptors is thought to be responsible. In humans, this reflex inhibition is partially reversed by epidural anesthesia.

Following upper abdominal and thoracic surgery, patients maintain adequate minute volume, but the tidal volume is smaller and the respiratory rate increases (ie, rapid shallow breathing). These breathing patterns, along with the residual effects of anesthesia and postoperative narcotics, inhibit cough, impair mucociliary clearance, and contribute to the risk of postoperative pneumonia.

Other factors that may contribute to increased respiratory complications include electrolyte imbalance (eg, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, hypocalcemia), general debilitation, and underlying lung disease (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]).

Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiograph...

Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiograph in a patient with severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Hyperinflation, depressed diaphragms, increased retrosternal space, and hypovascularity of lung parenchyma is demonstrated.

Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiograph...

Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiograph in a patient with severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Hyperinflation, depressed diaphragms, increased retrosternal space, and hypovascularity of lung parenchyma is demonstrated.


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A C...

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A CT scan shows hyperlucency due to hypovascularity and bullae formation diffusely, predominantly in upper lobes.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A C...

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A CT scan shows hyperlucency due to hypovascularity and bullae formation diffusely, predominantly in upper lobes.


Patient- and Procedure-Related Risk Factors

Numerous studies have been designed to investigate the relationship between various risk factors and postoperative complications. One of the larger ones was designed as a prospective cohort study where postoperative pulmonary complications ascertained by an investigator blinded to perioperative variables was conducted to determine the risk factors for pulmonary complications after elective nonthoracic surgery.2
 
Of 1055 consecutive patients, 28 (2.7%) suffered a postoperative pulmonary complication within 7 days of surgery; 13 developed respiratory failure that required ventilatory support; 9 developed pneumonia; 5 developed atelectasis that required bronchoscopic intervention; and 1 developed pneumothorax that required intervention.2 Multivariate analyses revealed that 4 factors were independently associated with increased risk of pulmonary complications: age (odds ratio [OR] 5.9 for age 65 y or older), positive cough test (OR 3.8), perioperative nasogastric tube (OR 7.7), and duration of anesthesia (OR 3.3 for operations lasting at least 2.5 h).2

A systematic review of the performance of variables commonly used in the prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing nonthoracic surgery was performed by Fisher et al.3 Seven studies fulfilled the investigators' inclusion criteria, and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications varied from 2% to 19%. Of 28 preoperative or operative risk factors evaluated in the 7 studies, 16 were associated significantly with postoperative pulmonary complications.3 Only 2 (duration of anesthesia and postoperative nasogastric tube placement) were significant in more than 1 study. However, these 16 variables had only modest predictive value. Neither hypercarbia nor reduced spirometry values were independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Patient-related risk factors

Age

Age appears to be an independent risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications.4 This conclusion is controversial, as several other studies have shown that age is not a predictor for postoperative pulmonary complications. Importantly, acceptable operative mortality rates can be achieved in older patients. 

In a study of patients older than 80 years, the overall 30-day mortality rate was 6.2%, and the mortality rate for patients who belonged to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II scale was less than 1%.5 As age is obviously a nonmodifiable risk factor, and the potential risk of complications does not invariably translate into increased mortality, surgery should not be declined because of advanced age alone.

Obesity

Obesity (ie, body mass index of >27 kg/m2) causes a reduction in lung volume, ventilation-perfusion mismatch, and relative hypoxemia, which are accentuated after surgery. In severe cases, obesity is associated with pulmonary hypertension, cor pulmonale, and hypercapnic respiratory failure (pickwickian syndrome). Although some studies suggest that obesity increases the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, others suggest that obesity is not an independent risk factor.

In a review article, the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications was not excessive in 7 studies of obese patients who underwent abdominal or peripheral procedures.6 Several other studies have also reported no association between obesity and postoperative pulmonary complications. Another study did not report excessive pulmonary complications in individuals who were obese and underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.7

General health status

The ASA classification and the Goldman Cardiac Risk Index have helped clinicians to successfully predict pulmonary risk. Patients who have poor exercise capacity are at increased risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications. In a study by Gerson et al, an inability to raise the heart rate with simple exercise predicted a pulmonary complication rate of 79%.8

Dependent functional status, low albumin, and weight loss are also specific and independent risk factors for complications.4 A serum albumin level less than 3.5 mg/dL is an independent risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications and should be checked in individuals with suspected hypoalbuminemia or at least one other risk factor for complications.9 The risk of complications increases continuously at serum albumin levels less than 3.5 mg/dL.10

Smoking

Patients who currently smoke have a 2-fold increased risk of postoperative complications, even in the absence of COPD.4 The risk is highest in patients who smoked within the last 2 months. Patients who quit smoking for more than 6 months have a risk similar to those who do not smoke, although the risk of postoperative pneumonia appears to remain elevated up to 1 year after smoking cessation.4

COPD

This condition is one of the most important risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients with severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] <40% predicted) are 6 times more likely to have a major postoperative complication. Similarly, an FEV 1 <60% predicted was found to be an independent predictor of increased mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures.11

Despite the increased risk, a prohibitive level of pulmonary function for an absolute contraindication is not apparent. The benefits of surgery must be weighed against these complications. A careful preoperative evaluation of patients with COPD should include identification of high-risk patients and aggressive treatment. Elective surgery should be deferred in patients who are symptomatic, have poor exercise capacity, or have acute exacerbation. 

Asthma

Asthma increases the risk of bronchospasm, hypoxemia, hypercapnia, inadequate cough, atelectasis, and pulmonary infection following surgery.12   Inadequate control of asthma preoperatively may increase the risk of these complications. Optimal asthma control is defined as the absence of symptoms and an FEV1 of greater than 80% of predicted or personal best.

Pulmonary hypertension

Patients with pulmonary hypertension experienced a higher mortality and morbidity rate following noncardiac surgery than other high-risk historic comparator groups, with a higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and other markers of severe pulmonary hypertension being independent risk factors in this cohort.13 Worse outcomes have also been documented following CABG.

Interstitial lung disease

Patients with pulmonary fibrosis experienced a higher rate of morbidity and mortality following resection for lung cancer.14

Sleep apnea

Patients with sleep apnea are at increased risk of developing deterioration of sleep-disordered breathing, severe hypoxemia, and hypercapnia in the postoperative period. Individuals with sleep apnea who are also obese may present difficulties with endotracheal intubation or early postoperative upper airway obstruction, requiring reintubation or other therapies.

In patients with known or possible sleep apnea, the intraoperative and postoperative use of sedatives and narcotics should be minimized. Careful monitoring in the postoperative period is required for worsening of sleep apnea, development of airway obstruction, or carbon dioxide retention. In patients who may have sleep apnea, the diagnosis should be confirmed and the severity should be assessed preoperatively with a formal polysomnographic sleep study.

The severity of sleep apnea is judged based on the apnea-hypopnea index and the lowest oxygen saturation value during sleep. Whenever possible, patients should be adequately treated preoperatively with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Further, patients with sleep apnea often benefit from regional anesthesia rather than general anesthesia.

Neurologic impairment

Patients with impaired sensorium or residual deficits from a previous stroke have an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia and respiratory failure.4

Immunosuppression

Chronic steroid use is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia. Daily use of alcohol within 2 weeks of surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia and respiratory failure. Insulin-treated diabetes is associated with an increased risk of postoperative respiratory failure.4

Procedure-related risk factors

Surgical site

The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications is inversely related to the distance of the surgical incision from the diaphragm. The complication rates for upper abdominal surgery range from 17% to 76%. For lower abdominal surgery, the rate is 0-5%. For thoracic surgery, the rate is 19-59%. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with the highest risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.4

Duration of surgery

Patients undergoing procedures lasting longer than 3-4 hours have a higher incidence rate of pulmonary complications (40%) compared with those undergoing surgeries lasting shorter than 2 hours (8%).

Type of anesthesia

Data are inconsistent about whether the pulmonary complication rate is lower with spinal or epidural anesthesia compared with general anesthesia. A study published by Celli et al reported no difference in patients anesthetized with spinal or general anesthesia for abdominal surgery.15 An earlier study of high-risk patients showed that the rate of respiratory failure was significantly higher with general anesthesia.16

Several other studies found high rates of respiratory failure and other postoperative complications in patients undergoing general anesthesia compared with spinal or epidural anesthesia.17,18 Spinal or epidural anesthesia, in conjunction with general anesthesia, may be associated with a lower risk of postoperative pneumonia, venous thromboembolic disease, myocardial infarction, renal failure, and respiratory depression.19 Patients who received epidural analgesia following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair had fewer complications than those receiving parenteral opioids.20

These results suggest that the addition of neuraxial anesthesia, rather than avoidance of general anesthesia, may be the key to reducing pulmonary complications. In any case, spinal or epidural anesthesia is safe and should be considered in high-risk patients. Regional nerve block is associated with a low risk and, when feasible, should also be considered for high-risk patients. Residual neuromuscular blockade was more common with pancuronium than intermediate-acting agents (eg, atracurium or vecuronium), and pulmonary complications occurred more often among patients who experienced persistent weakness following administration of pancuronium. Intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking agents should therefore be considered in high-risk patients.

Minimally invasive surgery

Laparoscopic abdominal surgery, particularly cholecystectomy, is associated with fewer postoperative pulmonary abnormalities and a shorter hospital stay. These techniques use small incisions, and the reduced manipulation of visceral organs minimizes the adverse effects on respiratory muscles. Laparoscopic surgery leads to a 23% decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC) and a 16% decrease in FEV1, and it is associated with a lower incidence of complications compared with laparatomy21 ; therefore, even patients with severe COPD can tolerate surgery.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery uses much smaller incisions; consequently, the hospitalization time is substantially reduced. Smaller incisions, performed without separation of the ribs and resulting in less postoperative pain, lead to early ambulation and reduced pulmonary complications.

Preoperative Risk Assessment

History

Obtain a complete history and perform a complete physical examination to help identify risk factors for pulmonary complications. Seek any history of smoking, exercise intolerance, unexplained dyspnea, or cough. Note evidence of COPD, such as decreased breath sounds, wheezes, crackles, or a prolonged expiratory phase.

Workup

Pulmonary function tests

Several retrospective studies of routine preoperative pulmonary function test (PFT) results found only a marginal benefit in predicting postoperative complications in patients, other than those undergoing lung resection. A critical review reported that preoperative spirometry was not predictive of complications following abdominal surgery.22 Therefore, pulmonary function studies should not be performed routinely in patients undergoing nonresectional surgery. Rather, testing should be restricted to those patients with unexplained dyspnea or exercise intolerance.

Preoperative identification of patients with asthma or COPD is important, as some individuals may benefit from specific preoperative interventions, but most can probably be detected by history, physical examination, and symptom-directed physiologic testing. Although data from studies by Kroenke et al23 and Wong et al24 indicated that patients with severe COPD have an overall high risk of postoperative complications (29%), the degree of physiologic impairment (eg, FEV 1 or FVC) does not correlate with the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Therefore, nonresectional surgery should never be withheld based solely on results from PFTs.

Arterial blood gases

Although hypercapnia has been associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in case series, a systematic review suggested that arterial blood gas (ABG) results are not independently predictive of complications.3  Presumably patients with hypercapnia may be identified as high-risk on the basis of other criteria.

Chest radiography

Chest x-ray studies add little to the clinical evaluation in healthy patients. A preoperative chest x-ray is the most frequently ordered radiologic test. A systematic review of the literature on the value of screening chest x-rays to establish evidence to support guidelines for its use was performed by Joo et al.25  The investigators reviewed 14 studies that met both inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria and identified chronic disorders, such as cardiomegaly and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in up to 65%. The rate of subsequent investigations was highly variable (4-47%). The findings led to a change in management in 10% of investigated patients.25

Postoperative pulmonary complications were also similar between patients who had preoperative chest x-rays (12.8%) and patients who did not (16%).25  The recommendation from the Guidelines Association Committee that routine chest x-rays should not be performed routinely for preoperative evaluation in patients without risk factors is supported by Joo et al's study.25

Risk indices

A number of scoring systems have been devised to predict an individual patient’s risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Each of these systems has potential limitations.

Postoperative pneumonia and respiratory failure risk indices

Arozullah et al derived and validated scoring systems to predict the risk of postoperative pneumonia and respiratory failure.4,26 These indices incorporate the following procedure and patient factors:

  • Procedure: Type of surgery, emergency surgery, general anesthesia
  • General health: Age, functional status, serum albumin, weight loss
  • Immunosuppression: Chronic steroid use, alcohol use, insulin-treated diabetes
  • Lung disease: COPD, smoking, preoperative pneumonia, dyspnea
  • Neurologic impairment
  • Fluid status: Congestive heart failure, renal failure, blood urea nitrogen, preoperative transfusion

Points are assigned based on the relative risk of postoperative pulmonary complications associated with each factor. The points are totaled and the patient is assigned to a risk class (1 through 5). The risk of postoperative pneumonia and respiratory failure are less than 1% for patients in risk class 1, whereas patients in risk class 5 have a 15% risk of postoperative pneumonia and 30% risk of respiratory failure. These indices were derived from Veterans Affairs medical center data and thus may lack generalizability to younger patients and women.26

Pulmonary risk index/cardiopulmonary risk index

A combined cardiopulmonary risk index is proposed for risk stratification of pulmonary complications. Pulmonary risk factors have been added to the Goldman Cardiac Risk Index; patients with a combined score of greater than 4 points (of a total of 10) are 17 times more likely to develop complications. These pulmonary risk factors include the following:

  • Obesity (ie, body mass index >27 kg/m2)
  • Cigarette smoking within 8 weeks of surgery
  • Productive cough within 5 days of surgery
  • Diffuse wheezing within 5 days of surgery
  • FEV1/FVC ratio less than 70% and PaCO2 >45 mm Hg

This index was developed to predict the risk of pulmonary complications specifically following thoracic surgery. Only limited predictive ability was noted in a prospective validation study.27

American Society of Anesthesiology classification

This score is based on simple clinical criteria and is easy to quantify. Although subjective, assignment to class II through V indicates an increased level of severity and increased postoperative morbidity. The ASA classification, along with examples of each class, is described below:

  • ASA class I - A normal, healthy patient without organic, physiologic, or psychiatric disturbance (eg, healthy with good exercise tolerance)
  • ASA class II - A patient with controlled medical conditions without significant systemic effects (eg, controlled hypertension or controlled diabetes without systemic effects, cigarette smoking without COPD, anemia, mild obesity, age younger than 1 yr or older than 70 y, pregnancy)
  • ASA class III - A patient with medical conditions with significant systemic effects, intermittently associated with significant functional compromise (eg, controlled congestive heart failure, stable angina, old myocardial infarction, poorly controlled hypertension, morbid obesity, bronchospastic disease with intermittent symptoms, chronic renal failure)
  • ASA class IV - A patient with a medical condition that is poorly controlled, associated with significant dysfunction and is a potential threat to life (eg, unstable angina, symptomatic COPD, symptomatic congestive heart failure, hepatorenal failure)
  • ASA class V - A patient with a critical medical condition that is associated with little chance of survival with or without the surgical procedure (eg, multiorgan failure, sepsis syndrome with hemodynamic instability, hypothermia, poorly controlled coagulopathy)
  • ASA class VI - A patient who is brain dead and undergoing anesthesia care for the purposes of organ donation

Preoperative Evaluation: Thoracic Surgery

Preoperative evaluation - lung resection

Surgical resection remains the only potential curative therapy for patients with localized non–small-cell lung cancer. These patients often have COPD from a long history of smoking. Development of COPD is considered a risk factor for bronchogenic carcinoma. The first successful pneumonectomy for the treatment of lung cancer was performed by Graham and Singer in 1933. Complete resection of stage I and II non–small-cell lung cancer is associated with a 5-year survival of rate approximately 70%. The overall 5-year survival rate from lung cancer is dismal, at 14%. Hence, every patient with limited lung cancer should be rigorously evaluated for potential resectability and cure.

Preoperative assessment helps identify patients at greatest risk for postoperative complications and those patients with severe impairment, in whom surgery is prohibitive.

A multicenter study found an in-hospital patient mortality rate of 3.8% after wedge resection, 3.7% after segmental resection, 4.2% after lobectomy, and 11.6% after pneumonectomy.28 The significant predictors of mortality were age older than 60 years, extended resection, chronic heart or lung disease, and low FEV1.

Guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP),29  British Thoracic Society, and Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland30 suggest a sequential evaluation of patients before lung resection, including spirometry, estimation of predicted postoperative lung function, and exercise testing (see Image 1 and below).


An algorithm for assessing candidates for lung re...

An algorithm for assessing candidates for lung resection. DLCO = diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; MVO2 = myocardial oxygen consumption; PPOFEV1 = predicted postoperative FEV1.

An algorithm for assessing candidates for lung re...

An algorithm for assessing candidates for lung resection. DLCO = diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; MVO2 = myocardial oxygen consumption; PPOFEV1 = predicted postoperative FEV1.



Step 1: Preoperative lung function

The ACCP revised its guidelines for pulmonary evaluation before resection for lung cancer.29  Spirometry is recommended for all patients being considered for such surgery. FEV1 is the primary value used to determine resectability. FEV1 predicts pulmonary reserve and is a strong predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients with a preoperative FEV1 of greater than 2 L (or 80% predicted) will be at average risk of complications following a full pneumonectomy, and a value of 1.5 L predicts acceptable risk following lobectomy. Use of the predicted value is recommended in women and older or shorter patients, as an absolute FEV1 cutoff is more likely to unjustly exclude such patients from surgery.

Measuring diffusion capacity is a noninvasive method to assess pulmonary circulation. Findings reflect the volume of the pulmonary capillary bed. Diffusion capacity is reportedly a good predictor of morbidity and mortality after lung resection. A diffusion capacity of less than 60% predicted is associated with a patient mortality rate of 24%.31 A diffusion capacity of less than 40% with borderline FEV1 values is associated with high mortality and morbidity, and surgery may be prohibitive.31

The ACCP recommends measurement of diffusion capacity if the preoperative FEV1 is lower than recommended for the planned operation, the patient's dyspnea appears out of proportion to the measured FEV1, or interstitial lung disease is suspected. Other investigators recommend checking diffusion capacity even in patients with adequate FEV1 values, although it is unclear if routine testing captures more patients with abnormally low diffusion capacity than selective testing.32,33

Step 2: Predicted postoperative lung function

Patients with an FEV1 less than that which is recommended and/or a diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <80% predicted should have their predicted postoperative FEV (ppoFEV 1 ) and DLCO (ppoDLCO) estimated. These estimates are calculated based on the following formula:

Predicted postoperative function = (preoperative function) × (% of function contributed by the lung that will remain postoperatively)

The percentage of function remaining can be estimated anatomically, by dividing the number of segments that will remain by the total number of segments (19) according to the table below (see Table 1).

This anatomic method performs well for predicting lung function that remains after segmentectomy and lobectomy. Quantitative radionuclide perfusion scanning is an alternative method and is particularly recommended for predicting lung function following pneumonectomy.  This study provides a relative perfusion for each area of the lung (expressed as a percentage), so the percentage of function remaining can be determined by subtracting the percentage of the area(s) that will be resected from 100%. Quantitative computed tomography (CT) scanning is a newer approach that can be used similarly.

Table 1. Prophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism

Open table in new window

Table

Condition

Risk, %*

Recommendation

General Surgery

Low risk

3

Early ambulation

Moderate risk

29

Unfractionated heparin: 5000 U subcutaneously (SC) given 2 h preoperatively and every 12 hours (q12h) postoperatively

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH):
Dalteparin, 2500 U 1-2 h before surgery, then once daily
Enoxaparin, 2000 U before surgery, then once daily
Nadroparin 3100 U 2 h before surgery, then once daily
Tinzaparin 3500 U 2 h before surgery, then once daily

High risk

39

Unfractionated heparin: 5000 U SC given 2 h preoperatively and q8h postoperatively

LMWH:
Dalteparin, 5000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily
Enoxaparin, 4000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily

Very high risk

80

(1) Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC given 2 h preoperatively and q8h postoperatively, dalteparin at 2500 U given 2 h preoperatively and qd,
and intermittent pneumatic compression applied intraoperatively
(2) Dalteparin at 5000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily
and enoxaparin at 4000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily
(3) Perioperative warfarin to maintain international normalized ratio (INR) of 2-3

Orthopedic Surgery/Neurological Surgery/Trauma

Total hip replacement

51

(1) Dalteparin at 5000 U 1-2 h before surgery, then once daily;
enoxaparin at 3000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily;
nadroparin at 40 U/kg U 2 h before surgery, then once daily;
and tinzaparin at 50 U/kg 2 h before surgery, then 75 U/kg once daily
(2) Warfarin preoperatively and adjusted to INR of 2-3 postoperatively,
continue up to 4 wk after surgery

Total knee replacement

61

(1) Dalteparin at 5000 U 1-2 h before surgery, then once daily;
enoxaparin at 3000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily;
nadroparin at 40 U/kg U 2 h before surgery, then once daily;
and tinzaparin at 50 U/kg 2 h before surgery, then 75 U/kg once daily
(2) Warfarin preoperatively and adjusted to INR of 2-3 postoperatively,
continue up to 4 wk after surgery

Hip fracture surgery

48

(1) Dalteparin at 5000 U 1-2 h before surgery, then once daily;
enoxaparin at 3000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily;
nadroparin at 40 U/kg U 2 h before surgery, then once daily;
and tinzaparin at 50 U/kg 2 h before surgery, then 75 U/kg once daily
(2) Warfarin preoperatively and adjusted to INR of 2-3 postoperatively,
continue up to 4 wk after surgery

Neurosurgery

24

(1) Intermittent pneumatic compression
(2) Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h and intermittent pneumatic compression for high-risk patients

Acute spinal cord injury with leg paralysis

40

(1) Unfractionated heparin SC in doses adjusted to paralysis to produce an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) equal to 1.5 times
the control value 6 h after dose
(2) Enoxaparin at 3000 U twice daily
(3) Warfarin adjusted to an INR of 2-3 in the rehabilitation phase
(4) Intermittent pneumatic compression plus unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h

Multiple trauma

53

Intermittent pneumatic compression until further bleeding is unlikely;
then, administer enoxaparin at 30 mg SC q12h or warfarin adjusted to an INR of 2-3

Medical Conditions

Acute myocardial infarction

24

Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h, unless therapeutic anticoagulation used

Ischemic stroke with paralysis

42

Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h

Medical patients (eg, with cancer, bedrest, CHF, severe lung disease)

20

Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h;
dalteparin at 2500 U once daily or enoxaparin at 2000 U once daily

Condition

Risk, %*

Recommendation

General Surgery

Low risk

3

Early ambulation

Moderate risk

29

Unfractionated heparin: 5000 U subcutaneously (SC) given 2 h preoperatively and every 12 hours (q12h) postoperatively

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH):
Dalteparin, 2500 U 1-2 h before surgery, then once daily
Enoxaparin, 2000 U before surgery, then once daily
Nadroparin 3100 U 2 h before surgery, then once daily
Tinzaparin 3500 U 2 h before surgery, then once daily

High risk

39

Unfractionated heparin: 5000 U SC given 2 h preoperatively and q8h postoperatively

LMWH:
Dalteparin, 5000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily
Enoxaparin, 4000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily

Very high risk

80

(1) Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC given 2 h preoperatively and q8h postoperatively, dalteparin at 2500 U given 2 h preoperatively and qd,
and intermittent pneumatic compression applied intraoperatively
(2) Dalteparin at 5000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily
and enoxaparin at 4000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily
(3) Perioperative warfarin to maintain international normalized ratio (INR) of 2-3

Orthopedic Surgery/Neurological Surgery/Trauma

Total hip replacement

51

(1) Dalteparin at 5000 U 1-2 h before surgery, then once daily;
enoxaparin at 3000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily;
nadroparin at 40 U/kg U 2 h before surgery, then once daily;
and tinzaparin at 50 U/kg 2 h before surgery, then 75 U/kg once daily
(2) Warfarin preoperatively and adjusted to INR of 2-3 postoperatively,
continue up to 4 wk after surgery

Total knee replacement

61

(1) Dalteparin at 5000 U 1-2 h before surgery, then once daily;
enoxaparin at 3000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily;
nadroparin at 40 U/kg U 2 h before surgery, then once daily;
and tinzaparin at 50 U/kg 2 h before surgery, then 75 U/kg once daily
(2) Warfarin preoperatively and adjusted to INR of 2-3 postoperatively,
continue up to 4 wk after surgery

Hip fracture surgery

48

(1) Dalteparin at 5000 U 1-2 h before surgery, then once daily;
enoxaparin at 3000 U 10-12 h before surgery, then once daily;
nadroparin at 40 U/kg U 2 h before surgery, then once daily;
and tinzaparin at 50 U/kg 2 h before surgery, then 75 U/kg once daily
(2) Warfarin preoperatively and adjusted to INR of 2-3 postoperatively,
continue up to 4 wk after surgery

Neurosurgery

24

(1) Intermittent pneumatic compression
(2) Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h and intermittent pneumatic compression for high-risk patients

Acute spinal cord injury with leg paralysis

40

(1) Unfractionated heparin SC in doses adjusted to paralysis to produce an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) equal to 1.5 times
the control value 6 h after dose
(2) Enoxaparin at 3000 U twice daily
(3) Warfarin adjusted to an INR of 2-3 in the rehabilitation phase
(4) Intermittent pneumatic compression plus unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h

Multiple trauma

53

Intermittent pneumatic compression until further bleeding is unlikely;
then, administer enoxaparin at 30 mg SC q12h or warfarin adjusted to an INR of 2-3

Medical Conditions

Acute myocardial infarction

24

Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h, unless therapeutic anticoagulation used

Ischemic stroke with paralysis

42

Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h

Medical patients (eg, with cancer, bedrest, CHF, severe lung disease)

20

Unfractionated heparin at 5000 U SC q12h;
dalteparin at 2500 U once daily or enoxaparin at 2000 U once daily


* Approximate risk without prophylaxis for all and/or proximal deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). CHF = congestive heart failure.


In the past, a predicted postpneumonectomy FEV1 of greater than 0.8 L was suggested as the lower limit of operability. This threshold was selected based on 2 studies. Segall and Butterworth showed that hypercapnia (PaCO2 >45 mm Hg) developed in patients with an FEV1 of less than 0.8 L.34  Olsen et al reported that a postpneumonectomy FEV1 of less than 0.8 L was associated with prohibitive risk.35 Other studies have since demonstrated acceptable mortality following pneumonectomy in patients with a postoperative FEV 1 lower than this threshold. Additionally, the use of an absolute cutoff biases against women and shorter or older patients.

Therefore, the percentage of predicted postoperative FEV 1 and DLCO (%ppoFEV 1 and %ppoDLCO) are preferred. A predicted postoperative FEV1 of 40% or greater is associated with an average risk of mortality. This value is required for performance of minimal activities of daily living (ADLs) without dyspnea. Lung resection that leaves the patient with a lower functioning lung certainly leads to a respiratory invalid. 

Likewise, a postoperative diffusion capacity of less than 40% predicted is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with either %ppoFEV 1 or %ppoDLCO less than 40% may still be operative candidates, but additional testing is recommended. Patients in whom both parameters are borderline, specifically those in whom the product of %ppoFEV 1 and %ppoDLCO is less than 1650, are at high risk and should generally be excluded from surgery. Likewise, a very low %ppoFEV 1 , specifically less than 30%, is associated with a survival rate of 20-30%. Therefore, a decline in the postoperative FEV1 to less than 30% not only causes immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality but also results in excessive longer-term mortality.

Several studies demonstrate that the above guidelines should not absolutely preclude well-selected patients with poor lung function from a potentially curative operation. Linden et al conducted a study to determine the morbidity, mortality, and feasibility of lung resection in patients with tumors and a preoperative FEV1 of less than 35% predicted.36 One hundred consecutive patients with resectable lung tumors and with a preoperative FEV1 of less than 35% predicted and surgery for curative intent were included.

The average preoperative predicted FEV1 was 26%; 16% of patients were oxygen dependent preoperatively.36 Minimally invasive surgical techniques and intensive pulmonary care resulted in a very low mortality and a very low incidence of ventilator dependence. Other serious complications, such as pneumonia, myocardial infarction, and bleeding, were uncommon, but Linden et al concluded that an extended hospital stay and a high incidence of prolonged air leak should be expected.36  

Other investigators have also shown resection in patients with low FEV 1 to be possible.  Specifically, some patients with COPD may have a less than expected decline, or even an increase, following resection, presumably due to a lung volume reduction effect.37 Furthermore, patients with a low FEV 1 and DLCO but with an acceptable exercise tolerance, as measured by stair climbing or cardiopulmonary exercise testing, appear to be at lower risk for pulmonary complications and should therefore not be excluded from surgery (see Image 1 or above.)

Step 3: Exercise testing

A comprehensive physiologic evaluation is dependent on the interaction among pulmonary function, cardiovascular function, and oxygen use.  The most objective assessment of exercise tolerance is provided by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. This test directly measures oxygen consumption (VO2 max), which is usually expressed as mL/kg/min. 

Several different studies have established that perioperative pulmonary complications can be predicted by stratifying preoperative VO2 max. Patients with a VO2 max of greater than 15-20 mL/kg/min are not at an increased risk of complications or death; a VO2 max of less than 15 mL/kg/min indicates an increased risk of perioperative complications; and patients with a VO2 max of less than 10 mL/kg/min have a very high risk for postoperative complications. Those with values less 10 mL/kg/min should generally be excluded from surgery.

If cardiopulmonary exercise testing is not available, stair climbing or the shuttle walk may be acceptable surrogates. In general terms, patients who can climb 5 flights of stairs have a VO2 max of greater than 20 mL/kg/min; patients unable to climb 1 flight of stairs have a VO2 max of less than 10 mL/kg/min. Patients who can climb 3 flights of stairs have a low risk of pulmonary complications following lobectomy. Patients who cannot complete 25 shuttles on 2 occasions will have a VO2 max of less than 10 mL/kg/min. Therefore, patients who cannot climb 1 flight of stairs or complete 25 shuttles should generally be excluded from surgery.29

Preoperative evaluation - cardiac surgery

The incidence of left lower lobe atelectasis has been reported in up to 90% of patients, which may increase the postoperative morbidity and prolong the hospital stay. The incidence is attributed to phrenic nerve injury and may last from 30 days to 2 years. Operative factors associated with this complication are a longer bypass time, entrance into the pleural cavity, direct injury during mobilization of the internal mammary artery, and cold cardioplegia.

Chest radiograph demonstrating complete atelectas...

Chest radiograph demonstrating complete atelectasis of the left lung.

Chest radiograph demonstrating complete atelectas...

Chest radiograph demonstrating complete atelectasis of the left lung.


Chest radiograph showing collapse of the left low...

Chest radiograph showing collapse of the left lower lobe toward the posterior and inferior aspect of the thoracic cavity. The atelectatic left lower lobe is present as a sail sign behind the cardiac shadow.

Chest radiograph showing collapse of the left low...

Chest radiograph showing collapse of the left lower lobe toward the posterior and inferior aspect of the thoracic cavity. The atelectatic left lower lobe is present as a sail sign behind the cardiac shadow.


The overall incidence of pulmonary complications after coronary bypass surgery is 7.5%. Patients with abnormal results from PFTs are more likely to have prolonged mechanical ventilation and postoperative pneumonia. No studies indicate a value of pulmonary function below which cardiac surgery is precluded.

Fuster et al evaluated the effect of chronic lung diseases by correlating preoperative pulmonary function tests to postcardiac surgery outcome.11 Of 1412 patients with preoperative PFTs, an abnormal result was found in 39% of patients: obstructive in 26% (FEV1/FVC <0.7), restrictive in 9%, and combined obstructive-restrictive in 4%. In addition, i-hospital mortality was higher in patients with an abnormal test (6.5%) than those without an abnormal test (0.9%).11
 
The study also demonstrated mortality was clearly related with the severity of lung disease: 0.9% in patients with an FEV1 of greater than 80%, 0.4% in patients with an FEV1 of 60-80%, 10.8% in patients with an FEV1 of 40-59%, and 54% in patients with an FEV1 of less than 40%.11 Although COPD was not an independent predictor of mortality, an FEV1 of 60% or less was significantly associated with death (24.6% vs 1.4%).

Preparation for Surgery

Smoking cessation

Although smoking is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications, one concern about smoking cessation in the immediate preoperative period is that abrupt removal of the irritant effect of cigarette smoke can inhibit coughing and lead to retention of secretions and small airway obstruction. As the beneficial effects of smoking cessation, including improvement in ciliary and small airway function and a decrease in sputum production, occur gradually over several weeks, a longer duration of abstinence before surgery would be expected to result in improved postoperative outcomes.

Warner et al prospectively investigated the role of preoperative smoking cessation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing CABG surgery.38 Those who currently smoked developed postoperative complications at a rate of 33%, compared with 57% for individuals who quit for less than 8 weeks. The complication rates were 11.9% in persons who never smoked and 14.5% in patients who had quit for more than 8 weeks.38

Although these results support the hypotheses presented above, a systematic review by Theadom and Cropley has suggested that smoking cessation should be pursued in most patients in the preoperative period, even very close to the time of surgery.39 The study by Warner et al was the only 1 of 12 studies included in the review to suggest an increase in postoperative complications in patients who quit smoking within 2 months of surgery, although the majority of the other studies focused on low-risk operations. 

Although Theadom and Cropley's review confirmed that a longer duration of smoking cessation provides a greater risk reduction, patients should be counseled to abstain from smoking regardless of the time remaining before surgery. When feasible, counseling, nicotine replacement therapies, bupropion, and varenicline improve the quit rate and should be used aggressively.

COPD

Aggressively treat patients with COPD to achieve the best possible baseline function. Bronchodilators, smoking cessation, antibiotics, and chest physical therapy may help significantly reduce pulmonary complications. Treat patients who have a persistent wheeze, functional limitation, or severe air flow obstruction with perioperative steroids.

A study of patients with COPD undergoing CABG demonstrated a decreased risk of postoperative complications among the group receiving prednisolone 20 mg daily for 10 days before surgery and continued until hospital discharge.40  The mean pretreatment FEV 1 was approximately 55% predicted. A similar study failed to show a difference in pulmonary complications between patients with COPD who did and did not receive preoperative steroids, but treated patients had a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay.41

Asthma

Optimize asthma control before surgery. Perioperative systemic corticosteroids are recommended for persistent symptoms if the peak flow rate and FEV1 are less than 80% predicted or previous best. Such treatment has been shown to decrease the risk of bronchospasm.42  The safety of perioperative corticosteroids is well established in patients with asthma, and their use is not associated with death, serious infections, or adrenal suppression. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression should be assumed to be present in patients who have received systemic steroids for more than 3 weeks in the past 6 months. These patients should receive stress-dose coverage perioperatively (hydrocortisone 100 mg IV q8h, with rapid tapering after 24 h).

Preoperative antibiotics

Indiscriminate use of prophylactic antibiotics does not lead to a reduction in pulmonary complications. These drugs may be used in patients with a clinically apparent respiratory infection. Cancel elective surgery if the patient has an active infection.

Inspiratory muscle training

Studies in patients undergoing particularly high-risk operations, specifically abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and CABG, have shown benefit for a preoperative regimen aimed at increasing inspiratory muscle strength. This intervention, consisting of exercises performed regularly for 2-4 weeks before surgery, decreased the frequency of atelectasis in patients undergoing AAA repair.43
 
An earlier study with similar intervention decreased complications and length of stay for patients at high risk of pulmonary complications following CABG.1  Although further studies, including patients undergoing other types of operations, should be performed to validate and generalize these findings, inspiratory muscle training for at least 2 weeks before surgery may be considered for high-risk patients.

Pulmonary rehabilitation

One small study demonstrated that a 4-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program improved exercise tolerance and enabled 8 patients who had previously not met criteria for lung resection for lung cancer to undergo surgery.44

Patient education

Lung expansion, deep breathing and coughing, and incentive spirometry are best taught to the patient before surgery and are useful for postoperative reduction of atelectasis.

Incentive spirometry, along with deep breathing a...

Incentive spirometry, along with deep breathing and coughing, is very helpful for reducing postoperative atelectasis.

Incentive spirometry, along with deep breathing a...

Incentive spirometry, along with deep breathing and coughing, is very helpful for reducing postoperative atelectasis.


Summary

The following preoperative measures help minimize pulmonary complications in at-risk patients:

  • Smoking cessation
  • Antibiotics for acute bronchitis
  • Optimize COPD and asthma treatment regimens
    • Course of systemic steroids if suboptimal control
  • Educate patients on lung expansion maneuvers
  • Consider inspiratory muscle training or pulmonary rehabilitation in high-risk patients

Intraoperative Strategies

Type of anesthesia

The type of anesthesia and neuromuscular blockage affect the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Intermediate- and shorter-acting agents (eg, vecuronium, rocuronium) are preferred, because residual neuromuscular blockade from longer-acting agents may contribute to pulmonary complications.

Based on available literature, spinal anesthesia may be safer than general anesthesia; therefore, spinal anesthesia should be considered for high-risk patients. Depending on the type and duration of surgery, endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation may be preferable because of the ability to monitor and control the respiratory rate and tidal volume.

Type of neuromuscular blockade

Pancuronium, a long-acting neuromuscular blocker, may lead to residual effects, cause hypoventilation, and increase complications. Use the intermediate-acting agents (eg, vecuronium, atracurium) in high-risk pulmonary patients.

Duration and type of surgery

When available, a less ambitious, shorter procedure should be considered in extremely high-risk patients. The duration of the surgical procedure is known to affect the rate of postoperative complications. Because upper abdominal and thoracic operations carry the greatest risk, a percutaneous (laparoscopic) procedure should be substituted for an open procedure if possible.

Postoperative Strategies

Lung expansion maneuvers

Lung expansion maneuvers include incentive spirometry, deep breathing exercises, postural drainage, percussion and vibration, cough, suctioning, mobilization, intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB), and CPAP. A meta-analysis of 48 trials suggested that the routine use of incentive spirometry provides no benefit following abdominal and cardiac surgery.45 No conclusions could be reached concerning the use of incentive spirometry following thoracic surgery, as none of the studies addressing that question met the quality criteria for inclusion in this review.

In most of the studies that were included in this analysis, incentive spirometry was compared to some other lung expansion modality rather than to no therapy.45 Among those studies with a control group, some demonstrated a reduction in complications with incentive spirometry, and others did not. These conflicting results may be due to disparities in patient populations, as incentive spirometry and other lung expansion maneuvers appear to be effective in higher risk patients.

Comparisons between modalities suggest that most are equally effective in reducing the risk of complications in such patients. For example, early mobilization was equivalent to early mobilization plus either incentive spirometry or deep breathing following cardiac surgery.46 Incentive spirometry, deep breathing, and IPPB were equivalent, and superior to no treatment, following abdominal surgery.15

Studies suggest that CPAP is the most effective lung expansion maneuver. A notable benefit of this modality is that it does not require patient cooperation or effort. Disadvantages include higher cost and greater risk of adverse events. CPAP administered for 12-24 hours following thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair reduced pulmonary complications, compared with intermittent CPAP use.47  Manual chest physical therapy and early ambulation were employed in all patients.47  

In conclusion, lung expansion maneuvers, aside from early mobilization, may not be required in most patients. Other methods are likely equivalent in moderate- and high-risk patients, so selection should focus on cost, availability, and expertise. CPAP may be targeted to high-risk patients, particularly those who are not able to cooperate with other modalities. Preoperative initiation and/or patient education improves the efficacy of these maneuvers. 

Pain control

Pain is a highly complex process involving specialized nociceptor fibers in the peripheral tissues; neurotransmitters and neuromodulators at all levels of neuraxis; integration of information in central nervous system; and learned behavior, affect, and cognitive status. Adequate postoperative pain control helps minimize pulmonary complications by encouraging earlier ambulation and performance of lung expansion maneuvers.

Management of postoperative pain includes narcotics and narcotic-like medications administered peripherally into the epidural or intrathecal space. Intrathecal administration of narcotics is associated with a longer duration of analgesia (15-22 h), respiratory depression, and headaches. Intercostal nerve blocks have also been shown to be beneficial in upper abdominal surgery.

Some studies have popularized the use of epidural analgesia as an alternative to parenteral narcotics. In upper abdominal procedures, patients who received epidural analgesia had lower rates of pulmonary complications and a shorter duration of hospital stay. Epidural catheters can be used for patients undergoing thoracic or upper abdominal surgery by placing the catheter at the thoracic vertebral level. Epidural narcotics provide a longer duration of action, a lack of excessive sedation and respiratory depression, and a minimum of or no sensory motor loss. The addition of a local anesthetic provides a more rapid onset of action and may help localize correct catheter placement; however, hypotension and motor blockade are potential adverse effects.

Epidural narcotics are morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, and hydroxymorphine; the local anesthetics used for epidural analgesia are bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Adding small doses of local anesthetics to narcotics is a preferred approach. This potentiates pain relief, minimizes nerve blockade, and reduces adverse effects from both agents. Postoperative epidural analgesia and intercostal nerve blocks improve pain control and help reduce postoperative complications, with little risk.

Cuschieri et al reported a postoperative pulmonary complication rate of 24% in postoperative patients receiving epidural analgesia, compared with a rate of 64% in those randomized to receive intramuscular morphine.48 Results from other studies provide conflicting results, with one possible conclusion being that patient-controlled analgesia and epidural analgesia are both superior to on-demand analgesia.49

Epidural hematoma is a rare complication, except when concomitant anticoagulation is prescribed. Epidural hematomas have been reported in patients receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) who had epidural catheters. Warnings have been issued on this issue by the national advisory panels. A safe practice is to not place the epidural catheter for at least 12 hours after the last dose of LMWH.

Perioperative use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may complement other pain management strategies. Nonsteroidal agents are known to decrease the narcotic requirement in the postoperative period. The agent ketorolac may be administered intramuscularly as needed. Other nonsteroidal agents are given orally or rectally. Caution is advised in patients at risk for bleeding, with a history of peptic ulcer disease, and established renal dysfunction.

Glycemic control

Glycemic control was associated with a reduced duration of mechanical ventilation in a mixed medical-surgical population,50 but the impact of this intervention specifically on postoperative pulmonary complications is unclear. Additionally, the optimal blood glucose target range remains a matter of debate.

Nasogastric decompression

Routine use of nasogastric tubes until bowel function returns following abdominal surgery is associated with higher rates of pneumonia and atelectasis relative to selective use of nasogastric tubes in patients who develop postoperative nausea or vomiting, inability to tolerate oral intake, or symptomatic abdominal distention.49  Selective nasogastric use was associated with a shorter time to oral intake without an increase in the risk of aspiration.49

Total parenteral nutrition

Although poor nutrition is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications, the routine use of total parenteral nutrition demonstrates no benefit over total enteral nutrition or no hyperalimentation, except perhaps in patients with severe malnutrition (>10% weight loss over 6 mo) or prolonged (10-14 d) inadequate enteral feeding.49

Prevention of thromboembolism

Although not technically considered a postoperative pulmonary complication, brief mention should be made of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Surgery is a well-recognized risk factor for the development of deep vein thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism.  Much as postoperative pulmonary complications, the risk of VTE is influenced by patient- and procedure-related factors. Risk assessment and recommendations for prevention of VTE in surgical patients have recently been updated.51 (See also the eMedicine article Perioperative DVT Prophylaxis).

Summary

The following postoperative measures help minimize pulmonary complications in at-risk patients:

  • Early mobilization
  • Lung expansion maneuvers
    • Consider CPAP in high-risk patients
  • Adequate pain control
    • Consider epidural analgesia in at-risk patients
  • Selective use of nasogastric decompression and total parenteral nutrition
  • DVT prophylaxis

Multimedia

An algorithm for assessing candidates for lung re...Media file 1: An algorithm for assessing candidates for lung resection. DLCO = diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; MVO2 = myocardial oxygen consumption; PPOFEV1 = predicted postoperative FEV1.
An algorithm for assessing candidates for lung re...

An algorithm for assessing candidates for lung resection. DLCO = diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; MVO2 = myocardial oxygen consumption; PPOFEV1 = predicted postoperative FEV1.

Incentive spirometry, along with deep breathing a...Media file 2: Incentive spirometry, along with deep breathing and coughing, is very helpful for reducing postoperative atelectasis.
Incentive spirometry, along with deep breathing a...

Incentive spirometry, along with deep breathing and coughing, is very helpful for reducing postoperative atelectasis.

Chest radiograph demonstrating complete atelectas...Media file 3: Chest radiograph demonstrating complete atelectasis of the left lung.
Chest radiograph demonstrating complete atelectas...

Chest radiograph demonstrating complete atelectasis of the left lung.

Chest radiograph showing collapse of the left low...Media file 4: Chest radiograph showing collapse of the left lower lobe toward the posterior and inferior aspect of the thoracic cavity. The atelectatic left lower lobe is present as a sail sign behind the cardiac shadow.
Chest radiograph showing collapse of the left low...

Chest radiograph showing collapse of the left lower lobe toward the posterior and inferior aspect of the thoracic cavity. The atelectatic left lower lobe is present as a sail sign behind the cardiac shadow.

Deep sulcus sign in a supine patient in the ICU. ...Media file 5: Deep sulcus sign in a supine patient in the ICU. The pneumothorax is subpulmonic.
Deep sulcus sign in a supine patient in the ICU. ...

Deep sulcus sign in a supine patient in the ICU. The pneumothorax is subpulmonic.

Image in a 49-year-old woman with pneumococcal pn...Media file 6: Image in a 49-year-old woman with pneumococcal pneumonia. The chest radiograph reveals a left lower lobe opacity with pleural effusion.
Image in a 49-year-old woman with pneumococcal pn...

Image in a 49-year-old woman with pneumococcal pneumonia. The chest radiograph reveals a left lower lobe opacity with pleural effusion.

Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiograph...Media file 7: Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiograph in a patient with severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Hyperinflation, depressed diaphragms, increased retrosternal space, and hypovascularity of lung parenchyma is demonstrated.
Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiograph...

Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiograph in a patient with severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Hyperinflation, depressed diaphragms, increased retrosternal space, and hypovascularity of lung parenchyma is demonstrated.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A C...Media file 8: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A CT scan shows hyperlucency due to hypovascularity and bullae formation diffusely, predominantly in upper lobes.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A C...

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A CT scan shows hyperlucency due to hypovascularity and bullae formation diffusely, predominantly in upper lobes.

Keywords

perioperative pulmonary management, pulmonary complications, ventilation management, perioperative morbidity, perioperative mortality, atelectasis, bronchitis, pneumonia, prolonged mechanical ventilation, respiratory failure, chronic lung disease, bronchospasm, adverse effects of anesthesia, diaphragm dysfunction, diaphragmatic dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD, PE, pulmonary embolism, DVT, deep vein thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis

 


Related eMedicine Topics

Best Evidence

Clinical Trials

National Guideline Clearinghouse


More on Perioperative Pulmonary Management

References

References

  1. Hulzebos EH, Helders PJ, Favie NJ, et al. Preoperative intensive inspiratory muscle training to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients undergoing CABG surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. Oct 18 2006;296(15):1851-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  2. McAlister FA, Bertsch K, Man J, Bradley J, Jacka M. Incidence of and risk factors for pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Mar 1 2005;171(5):514-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  3. Fisher BW, Majumdar SR, McAlister FA. Predicting pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery: a systematic review of blinded studies. Am J Med. Feb 15 2002;112(3):219-25. [Medline].

  4. Arozullah AM, Conde MV, Lawrence VA. Preoperative evaluation for postoperative pulmonary complications. Med Clin North Am. Jan 2003;87(1):153-73. [Medline].

  5. Djokovic JL, Hedley-Whyte J. Prediction of outcome of surgery and anesthesia in patients over 80. JAMA. Nov 23 1979;242(21):2301-6. [Medline].

  6. Smetana GW. Preoperative pulmonary evaluation. N Engl J Med. Mar 25 1999;340(12):937-44. [Medline].

  7. Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Pearlstein AR. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese and non-obese patients. Am Surg. May 1994;60(5):316-21. [Medline].

  8. Gerson MC, Hurst JM, Hertzberg VS, et al. Prediction of cardiac and pulmonary complications related to elective abdominal and noncardiac thoracic surgery in geriatric patients. Am J Med. Feb 1990;88(2):101-7. [Medline].

  9. Qaseem A, Snow V, Fitterman N, et al, for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. Apr 18 2006;144(8):575-80. [Medline][Full Text].

  10. Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Cornell JE. Preoperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. Apr 18 2006;144(8):581-95. [Medline][Full Text].

  11. Fuster RG, Argudo JA, Albarova OG, et al. Prognostic value of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Feb 2006;29(2):202-9. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Coordinating Committee. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda, Md: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; August 2007:[Full Text].

  13. Ramakrishna G, Sprung J, Ravi BS, Chandrasekaran K, McGoon MD. Impact of pulmonary hypertension on the outcomes of noncardiac surgery: predictors of perioperative morbidity and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 17 2005;45(10):1691-9. [Medline].

  14. Kumar P, Goldstraw P, Yamada K, et al. Pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer: risk and benefit analysis of pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jun 2003;125(6):1321-7. [Medline].

  15. Celli BR, Rodriguez KS, Snider GL. A controlled trial of intermittent positive pressure breathing, incentive spirometry, and deep breathing exercises in preventing pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. Am Rev Respir Dis. Jul 1984;130(1):12-5. [Medline].

  16. Tarhan S, Moffitt EA, Sessler AD, Douglas WW, Taylor WF. Risk of anesthesia and surgery in patients with chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Surgery. Nov 1973;74(5):720-6. [Medline].

  17. Yeager MP, Glass DD, Neff RK, Brinck-Johnsen T. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in high-risk surgical patients. Anesthesiology. Jun 1987;66(6):729-36. [Medline].

  18. Pedersen T, Viby-Mogensen J, Bang U, et al. Does perioperative tactile evaluation of the train-of-four response influence the frequency of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade?. Anesthesiology. Nov 1990;73(5):835-9. [Medline].

  19. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. Dec 16 2000;321(7275):1493. [Medline].

  20. Major CP Jr, Greer MS, Russell WL, Roe SM. Postoperative pulmonary complications and morbidity after abdominal aneurysmectomy: a comparison of postoperative epidural versus parenteral opioid analgesia. Am Surg. Jan 1996;62(1):45-51. [Medline].

  21. Torrington KG, Bilello JF, Hopkins TK, Hall EA Jr. Postoperative pulmonary changes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. South Med J. Jul 1996;89(7):675-8. [Medline].

  22. Lawrence VA, Page CP, Harris GD. Preoperative spirometry before abdominal operations. A critical appraisal of its predictive value. Arch Intern Med. Feb 1989;149(2):280-5. [Medline].

  23. Kroenke K, Lawrence VA, Theroux JF, Tuley MR, Hilsenbeck S. Postoperative complications after thoracic and major abdominal surgery in patients with and without obstructive lung disease. Chest. Nov 1993;104(5):1445-51. [Medline][Full Text].

  24. Wong DH, Weber EC, Schell MJ, et al. Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Anesth Analg. Feb 1995;80(2):276-84. [Medline][Full Text].

  25. Joo HS, Wong J, Naik VN, Savoldelli GL. The value of screening preoperative chest x-rays: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth. Jun-Jul 2005;52(6):568-74. [Medline][Full Text].

  26. Arozullah AM, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J. Development and validation of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after major noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. Nov 20 2001;135(10):847-57. [Medline].

  27. Melendez JA, Carlon VA. Cardiopulmonary risk index does not predict complications after thoracic surgery. Chest. Jul 1998;114(1):69-75. [Medline][Full Text].

  28. Romano PS, Mark DH. Patient and hospital characteristics related to in-hospital mortality after lung cancer resection. Chest. May 1992;101(5):1332-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  29. Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. Sep 2007;132(3 suppl):161S-77S. [Medline][Full Text].

  30. British Thoracic Society; Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Working Party. BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. Thorax. Feb 2001;56(2):89-108. [Medline][Full Text].

  31. Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR, et al. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis. Apr 1989;139(4):902-10. [Medline].

  32. Brunelli A, Salati M. Preoperative evaluation of lung cancer: predicting the impact of surgery on physiology and quality of life. Curr Opin Pulm Med. Jul 2008;14(4):275-81. [Medline].

  33. Ferguson MK, Vigneswaran WT. Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity after lung resection in patients without obstructive lung disease. Ann Thorac Surg. Apr 2008;85(4):1158-64; discussion 1164-5. [Medline].

  34. Segall JJ, Butterworth BA. Ventilatory capacity in chronic bronchitis in relation to carbon dioxide retention. Scand J Respir Dis. 1966;47(3):215-24. [Medline].

  35. Olsen GN, Block AJ, Tobias JA. Prediction of postpneumonectomy pulmonary function using quantitative macroaggregate lung scanning. Chest. Jul 1974;66(1):13-6. [Medline][Full Text].

  36. Linden PA, Bueno R, Colson YL, et al. Lung resection in patients with preoperative FEV1 < 35% predicted. Chest. Jun 2005;127(6):1984-90. [Medline][Full Text].

  37. Brunelli A, Monteverde M, Borri A, et al. Predicted versus observed maximum oxygen consumption early after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. Aug 2003;76(2):376-80. [Medline].

  38. Warner MA, Offord KP, Warner ME, et al. Role of preoperative cessation of smoking and other factors in postoperative pulmonary complications: a blinded prospective study of coronary artery bypass patients. Mayo Clin Proc. Jun 1989;64(6):609-16. [Medline].

  39. Theadom A, Cropley M. Effects of preoperative smoking cessation on the incidence and risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications in adult smokers: a systematic review. Tob Control. Oct 2006;15(5):352-8. [Medline].

  40. Bingol H, Cingoz F, Balkan A, Kilic S, Bolcal C, Demirkilic U, et al. The effect of oral prednisolone with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg. May-Jun 2005;20(3):252-6. [Medline].

  41. Starobin D, Kramer MR, Garty M, Shitirt D. Morbidity associated with systemic corticosteroid preparation for coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a case control study. J Cardiothorac Surg. Jun 4 2007;2:25. [Medline][Full Text].

  42. Silvanus MT, Groeben H, Peters J. Corticosteroids and inhaled salbutamol in patients with reversible airway obstruction markedly decrease the incidence of bronchospasm after tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. May 2004;100(5):1052-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  43. Dronkers J, Veldman A, Hoberg E, van der Waal C, van Meeteren N. Prevention of pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery by preoperative intensive inspiratory muscle training: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. Feb 2008;22(2):134-42. [Medline].

  44. Cesario A, Ferri L, Galetta D, et al. Pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation and surgery for lung cancer. Lung Cancer. Jul 2007;57(1):118-9. [Medline].

  45. Overend TJ, Anderson CM, Lucy SD, et al. The effect of incentive spirometry on postoperative pulmonary complications: a systematic review. Chest. Sep 2001;120(3):971-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  46. Dull JL, Dull WL. Are maximal inspiratory breathing exercises or incentive spirometry better than early mobilization after cardiopulmonary bypass?. Phys Ther. May 1983;63(5):655-9. [Medline][Full Text].

  47. Kindgen-Milles D, Muller E, Buhl R, et al. Nasal-continuous positive airway pressure reduces pulmonary morbidity and length of hospital stay following thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Chest. Aug 2005;128(2):821-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  48. Cuschieri RJ, Morran CG, Howie JC, McArdle CS. Postoperative pain and pulmonary complications: comparison of three analgesic regimens. Br J Surg. Jun 1985;72(6):495-8. [Medline].

  49. Lawrence VA, Cornell JE, Smetana GW. Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. Apr 18 2006;144(8):596-608. [Medline][Full Text].

  50. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. Nov 8 2001;345(19):1359-67. [Medline][Full Text].

  51. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest. Jun 2008;133(6 suppl):381S-453S. [Medline].

  52. Ali MK, Mountain CF, Ewer MS, Johnston D, Haynie TP. Predicting loss of pulmonary function after pulmonary resection for bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest. Mar 1980;77(3):337-42. [Medline][Full Text].

  53. Beckles MA, Spiro SG, Colice GL, Rudd RM. The physiologic evaluation of patients with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery. Chest. Jan 2003;123(1 Suppl):105S-114S. [Medline][Full Text].

  54. Boysen PG, Block AJ, Olsen GN, et al. Prospective evaluation for pneumonectomy using the 99mtechnetium quantitative perfusion lung scan. Chest. Oct 1977;72(4):422-5. [Medline][Full Text].

  55. Brooks-Brunn JA. Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. Chest. Mar 1997;111(3):564-71. [Medline][Full Text].

  56. Chretien PB, Twomey PL, Trahan EE, Catalona WJ. Quantitative dinitrochlorobenzene contact sensitivity in preoperative and cured cancer patients. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. Dec 1973;39:263-6. [Medline].

  57. Colman NC, Schraufnagel DE, Rivington RN, Pardy RL. Exercise testing in evaluation of patients for lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis. May 1982;125(5):604-6. [Medline].

  58. Dales RE, Dionne G, Leech JA, Lunau M, Schweitzer I. Preoperative prediction of pulmonary complications following thoracic surgery. Chest. Jul 1993;104(1):155-9. [Medline][Full Text].

  59. Datta D, Lahiri B. Preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing lung resection surgery. Chest. Jun 2003;123(6):2096-103. [Medline][Full Text].

  60. Ford GT, Whitelaw WA, Rosenal TW, Cruse PJ, Guenter CA. Diaphragm function after upper abdominal surgery in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. Apr 1983;127(4):431-6. [Medline].

  61. Garibaldi RA, Britt MR, Coleman ML, Reading JC, Pace NL. Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia. Am J Med. Mar 1981;70(3):677-80. [Medline].

  62. Gass GD, Olsen GN. Preoperative pulmonary function testing to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality. Chest. Jan 1986;89(1):127-35. [Medline][Full Text].

  63. Gracey DR, Divertie MB, Didier EP. Preoperative pulmonary preparation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective study. Chest. Aug 1979;76(2):123-9. [Medline].

  64. Hjortso NC, Neumann P, Frosig F, et al. A controlled study on the effect of epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics and morphine on morbidity after abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Nov 1985;29(8):790-6. [Medline].

  65. Best Evidence: Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M, et al. Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. Oct 27 2008;168(19):2131-6. [Medline].

  66. Marshall MC, Olsen GN. The physiologic evaluation of the lung resection candidate. Clin Chest Med. Jun 1993;14(2):305-20. [Medline].

  67. McAlister FA, Khan NA, Straus SE, et al. Accuracy of the preoperative assessment in predicting pulmonary risk after nonthoracic surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Mar 1 2003;167(5):741-4. [Medline][Full Text].

  68. Mohr DN, Jett JR. Preoperative evaluation of pulmonary risk factors. J Gen Intern Med. May-Jun 1988;3(3):277-87. [Medline].

  69. Nakagawa M, Tanaka H, Tsukuma H, Kishi Y. Relationship between the duration of the preoperative smoke-free period and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications after pulmonary surgery. Chest. Sep 2001;120(3):705-10. [Medline][Full Text].

  70. Pasulka PS, Bistrian BR, Benotti PN, Blackburn GL. The risks of surgery in obese patients. Ann Intern Med. Apr 1986;104(4):540-6. [Medline].

  71. Best Evidence: Popping DM, Elia N, Marret E, Remy C, Tramer MR. Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. Oct 2008;143(10):990-9; discussion 1000. [Medline].

  72. Smith TP, Kinasewitz GT, Tucker WY, Spillers WP, George RB. Exercise capacity as a predictor of post-thoracotomy morbidity. Am Rev Respir Dis. May 1984;129(5):730-4. [Medline].

  73. Stock MC, Downs JB, Gauer PK, Alster JM, Imrey PB. Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications with CPAP, incentive spirometry, and conservative therapy. Chest. Feb 1985;87(2):151-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  74. Weissman C. Pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Sep 2004;8(3):185-211. [Medline].

Further Reading

Related eMedicine Topics

Best Evidence

Clinical Trials

National Guideline Clearinghouse

Keywords

perioperative pulmonary management, pulmonary complications, ventilation management, perioperative morbidity, perioperative mortality, atelectasis, bronchitis, pneumonia, prolonged mechanical ventilation, respiratory failure, chronic lung disease, bronchospasm, adverse effects of anesthesia, diaphragm dysfunction, diaphragmatic dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD, PE, pulmonary embolism, DVT, deep vein thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Mark A Yoder, MD, Assistant Professor, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago
Mark A Yoder, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and Society of Critical Care Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC, Professor and Head, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Site Director, Respiratory Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital
Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Thoracic Society, Canadian Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Royal Society of Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and World Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Helen M Hollingsworth, MD, Director, Adult Asthma and Allergy Services, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Boston Medical Center
Helen M Hollingsworth, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and Massachusetts Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Donna Leco Mercado, MD, Director of Medical Consultation, Department of Internal Medicine, Baystate Medical Center; Assistant Professor, Tufts University School of Medicine
Donna Leco Mercado, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Timothy D Rice, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine
Timothy D Rice, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William A Schwer, MD, Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Rush Medical College; Chairman, Department of Family Medicine, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center
William A Schwer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.