Opioid Abuse Treatment & Management

  • Author: Adrian Preda, MD; Chief Editor: Eduardo Dunayevich, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jan 25, 2012
 

Medical Care

Acute opioid-related disorders that require medical management include opioid intoxication, opioid overdose, and opioid withdrawal. Issues pertaining to treatment of chronic opioid abuse include opioid agonist therapy (OAT), psychotherapy, and treatment of acute pain in patients already on maintenance therapy.

Opioid intoxication

General supportive measures for opioid intoxication are as follows:

  • Assess patient to clear airway.
  • Provide support ventilation, if needed.
  • Assess and support cardiac function.
  • Provide IV fluids.
  • Frequently monitor the vital signs and cardiopulmonary status until the patient has cleared opioids from the system.
  • Give IV naloxone if necessary. Naloxone is a specific opiate antagonist with no agonist or euphoriant properties. When administered intravenously or subcutaneously, it rapidly reverses the respiratory depression and sedation caused by heroin intoxication.

Opioid overdose

Naloxone is effective in treating acute overdose and is first-line treatment.

Because overdoses usually occur in the presence of other people and because medical care is often not sought or is sought too late, at-home naloxone programs have been piloted in several countries. This is a controversial treatment that raises concerns about condoning heroin use, discouraging medical care, and producing side effects that cannot be managed at home. However, the efficacy of these pilot programs should be carefully monitored, as the potential for reducing mortality is high.

Opioid maintenance therapy

Pharmacologic therapy for heroin addiction has focused on ameliorating withdrawal symptoms and reducing cravings. By replacing heroin with legally obtained opioid agonists, many risk factors of the drug-abusing lifestyle can be mitigated.

Methadone maintenance therapy[10] (MMT) has been the standard of care for more than 30 years. However, the recent advent of buprenorphine maintenance therapy (BMT) is changing the landscape of treatment for opioid-dependent patients.[11]

Methadone, a long-acting synthetic opioid agonist, can be dosed once daily and replaces the necessity for multiple daily heroin doses. As such, it stabilizes the drug-abusing lifestyle, reducing criminal behaviors, and also reducing needle sharing and promiscuous behaviors leading to transmission of HIV and other diseases.

Methadone is a highly regulated Schedule II medication, only available at specialized methadone maintenance clinics. It is estimated that established methadone clinics can accommodate only 15-20% of US heroin addicts.

Methadone clinics often generate controversy in communities fearful of addicts in various stages of recovery. In addition, some patients are unable to travel to clinics, and others will not enter MMT because of fear of stigmatization. Clearly other options would be beneficial for treatment of chronic opioid abuse.

Buprenorphine is a mu-opioid partial agonist that, like methadone, suppresses withdrawal and cravings. However, the property of partial agonism confers a "ceiling effect," at which higher doses of buprenorphine cause no additional effects. This ceiling effect affords a wider margin of safety than methadone, which can be lethal in overdose. The increased safety of buprenorphine has allowed it to become available by prescription as a Schedule III medication.

Buprenorphine has been combined with naloxone[12] in a 4:1 ratio (Suboxone) in order to alleviate concerns that the sublingual tablet would be dissolved and injected by addicts. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist that is poorly absorbed sublingually and orally but is well-absorbed intravenously. As a result, an opioid-dependent patient injecting buprenorphine/naloxone will suffer a withdrawal syndrome secondary to naloxone's occupation of mu-opioid receptors.

Office-based treatment of opioid addiction is now possible with BMT.[13] Physicians wishing to prescribe buprenorphine must meet several criteria, including requirements outlined in the Drug Abuse Treatment Act of 2000. However, physicians who do not meet these criteria can take an 8-hour training course to become certified to prescribe buprenorphine. Currently, physicians are limited to 30 buprenorphine patients, but this restriction may soon be lifted.

Persons with opioid dependence often experience difficulty following current existing pharmacologic treatments designed to reduce or eliminate opioid use. Ling et al studied the efficacy of buprenorphine implants over a 6-month period in patients with opioid dependence. Initial induction with sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone tablets preceded implant placement. Less opioid use was observed (as assessed by urine samples) in patients using the buprenorphine implants compared with placebo implants.[14]

Historically, l-alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM) has also been used for opioid-dependence maintenance pharmacotherapy. However, LAAM is associated with prolonged QT interval, and several cases of cardiac arrhythmia and death have been reported. Therefore, LAAM was recently removed from the market in the European Union and was given a black box label by the FDA.

Several Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews about the efficacy of opioid agonist therapy have been published in recent years. While all of these reviews stress the need for larger, multicenter, randomized clinical trials of longer duration, some conclusions can be drawn from existing data.

A review of Cochrane reviews found that high-dose MMT (60-109 mg/d) is more effective in retaining patients in treatment than low-dose MMT (1-59 mg/d). Moreover, methadone at flexible doses was more effective in retaining patients in treatment (RR, 1.23) than buprenorphine. A second systematic review of databases found that low-dose methadone (20 mg/d) was less effective than buprenorphine (2-8 mg/d) and that high-dose methadone (>50-65 mg/d) was more effective than buprenorphine (2-8 mg/d).

Another Cochrane review found that oral substitution treatment was associated with significant reductions in heroin injection and needle sharing, as well as a decrease in patients with multiple sexual partners and a reduction in exchanges of sex for drugs or money.[15] Importantly, these changes were correlated with reductions in cases of HIV infection.

Although pain is common among opioid-dependent patients, pharmacologic approaches are limited. Tsui et al found that treatment with escitalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in pain severity and pain interference during the initial 3 months of treatment.[16]

Preventing opioid dependence relapse

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial suggested that an injectable, sustained-release form of naltrexone (Depotrex) increased retention of patients in treatment for opioid abuse.[17] Further studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment modality.

FDA approval of extended-release IM naltrexone for the prevention of relapse to opioid dependence was based on data from a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study, which met its primary efficacy endpoint and all secondary efficacy endpoints. Once monthly treatment with extended-release IM naltrexone showed statistically significant higher rates of opioid-free urine screens compared with placebo (p< 0.0002).

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 24-week trial, 250 patients with opiate dependence were given monthly injections of an extended-release formulation of 380 mg of naltrexone or placebo.[18] The study found substantial benefit in the actively treated group, with abstinence rates of 90% compared with 35%. Other measures confirmed this benefit, with a median retention of 168 days in the naltrexone group compared with 96 days in the placebo group, and reduced craving in the naltrexone group. Given the poor therapeutic efficacy of oral naltrexone in most opioid-dependent populations, this intramuscular formulation may be a valuable addition to the methods of treating opioid dependence if its value is verified in subsequent studies over longer therapeutic time periods in diverse groups of patients.

Stress has been associated with impaired decision making and increased risk for relapse, even after long periods of abstinence. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized protocol, the negative effects of stress on performance were prevented by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol as early as after 30 days and as late as 24 months after abstinence began, suggesting a potential role for beta-blockers in decreasing the risk for relapse.[19]

Because decision-making deficits are common, individuals with more prominent deficits may particularly benefit from treatment in a residential setting.[20]

Opiate withdrawal

Opiate withdrawal is generally considered less likely to produce severe morbidity or mortality compared with barbiturates and benzodiazepines. Safe withdrawal from opioids is termed detoxification and can be performed as outpatient or inpatient therapy, depending upon the following: presence of comorbid medical and psychiatric problems, availability of social support, and polydrug abuse.

Methadone, buprenorphine, and alpha-2 agonists, such as clonidine and lofexidine, are commonly used pharmacologic methods of detoxification. The use of methadone and buprenorphine is based on the principle of cross-tolerance in which one opioid is replaced with another and then slowly withdrawn. Alpha-2 agonists appear to be most effective in suppressing autonomically mediated signs and symptoms of abstinence[21] , but they are less effective for subjective symptoms.

Two recent Cochrane reviews compared the efficacy of alpha-2 adrenergic agonists to methadone or buprenorphine for management of withdrawal.[22, 23] Patients experienced decreased side effects and stayed in treatment longer using tapered methadone compared to the alpha-2 agonists clonidine or lofexidine.

Buprenorphine was associated with fewer adverse effects than clonidine, and patients were more likely to complete withdrawal with buprenorphine compared with clonidine. Moreover, a second multicenter randomized trial demonstrated that buprenorphine-naloxone was more effective than clonidine for opioid detoxification. Buprenorphine was equally effective as methadone for withdrawal completion, but withdrawal symptoms appeared to resolve more quickly with buprenorphine.

In summary, data to date suggest that buprenorphine and methadone are more effective than alpha-2 agonists, such as clonidine, for opioid detoxification, with buprenorphine associated with a shorter duration of withdrawal symptoms. However, all of these medications are effective, and the choice may depend in part on availability.

Kunoe et al described use of an investigational naltrexone implant in 56 abstinence-oriented patients who completed inpatient treatment for opioid dependence compared with patients who received usual care instead of the implant. The implant group had an average 45 days less heroin use and 60 days less opioid use than the usual care group over a 6-month period (P < 0.05). The naltrexone implant significantly reduced opioid use compared with usual care.[24]

Hulse et al compared daily oral naltrexone with a sustained-release naltrexone implant in 70 patients with DSM-IV heroin dependence. Study participants were randomized to receive either daily oral naltrexone (50 mg/d, plus placebo implants) or naltrexone implant (2.3 g, plus placebo tablets). More patients in the oral group had naltrexone serum concentrations less than 2 mg/mL at month 1 (P < 0.001) and month 2 (P < 0.01) compared with the implant group. Return to regular heroin use was observed more in the oral group by 6 months (P =0.003) and at an earlier stage (median 115 d vs 158 d) compared with the implant group. The authors concluded that naltrexone implant is effective in reducing relapse to regular heroin use compared with oral naltrexone.[25]

Psychotherapies and support groups: Detoxification alone, without ongoing treatment, is not adequate to manage patients.[26]

Patients in methadone programs often benefit from cognitive behavioral, supportive, or analytical-oriented psychotherapies if they are added to standard drug counseling.

Cognitive behavior psychotherapy primarily focuses on the patient's thoughts and behaviors. Cognitive behavior–based models are widely used in drug rehabilitation programs. Cognitive behavior theories were aimed at substance abuse beginning in the mid 1980s. The techniques used help patients acquire specific skills for resisting substance use and teach coping skills to reduce problems related to drug use. Two major cognitive behavior theories of substance abuse are the following:

  • Relapse prevention: Based on the work of Marlatt and Gordon, important relapse prevention concepts and techniques include identification and avoidance of high-risk situations, understanding the chain of decisions leading to drug use, and changing one's lifestyle.
  • Cognitive therapy of substance abuse: Developed by Beck and colleagues, cognitive therapy of substance abuse is based on the concept that drug abusers engage in complex behaviors and thought processes, such as positive and negative drug-related beliefs and spontaneous flashes related to drug use before giving in to the actual drug use

Dynamic psychotherapy is based on the concept that all symptoms arise from underlying unconscious psychological conflicts. The major goal of this therapy is to help the patient become aware of these conflicts and develop more adaptive coping mechanisms and healthier methods of resolving intrapsychic conflict.

Group therapy is argued to be especially effective because it can target the social stigma attached to having lost control of a substance. The presence of other group members who acknowledge having similar problems can provide support and be therapeutic in developing alternative methods of maintaining abstinence.

Aversion therapy involves pairing aversive stimuli to cognitive images of opioid use and conversely conjuring images of socially appropriate behaviors such as employment, education, and nondrug behavior.

Narcotics Anonymous (NA): In 1947, NA was formed in Lexington, Ky. NA is based on principles similar to those of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), including progression through 12 steps of recovery. Some patients have difficulty engaging in the AA-NA approach to recovery; however, these programs do help some people and can provide much needed support for those attempting abstinence.

Although psychosocial therapy is likely to be beneficial in the treatment of opiate withdrawal, the specific type of psychosocial therapy may not be important. A Cochrane review assessed 11 studies involving 1592 patients and explored the effectiveness of any psychosocial intervention combined with any pharmacological intervention versus any pharmacological intervention alone for opioid detoxification treatment. Five different psychosocial interventions (including behavioral, counseling, and family therapies) were added to treatment with either methadone or buprenorphine. The addition of the psychosocial intervention (regardless of the specific psychosocial approach) to the pharmacological treatment significantly reduced dropouts, use of opioids during treatment, use of opioids during follow up, and clinical absences during treatment.[27]

Pain management

A recent systematic review found that patients with chronic pain (noncancer) who had comorbid substance use disorders are more likely to be prescribed opioids and higher doses of opioid medications compared with patients who do not have a history of substance use disorders despite similar pain outcomes.[28]

As more patients with opioid addiction receive OAT, physicians will encounter OAT patients with acute pain syndromes. Acute pain must be adequately treated in these patients.[29]

Common misconceptions include the following:

  • OAT provides analgesia: Maintenance methadone or buprenorphine does not provide sustained analgesia. Although methadone and buprenorphine are potent analgesics, the analgesic properties last only 4-8 hours, while the medications are dosed every 24-48 hours.
  • Use of opioid analgesia may cause addiction relapse: No evidence indicates that exposure to opioid analgesics during acute pain increases relapse rates. In fact, evidence suggests that the stress of unrelieved pain can trigger relapse.
  • The combination of OAT and other opioids may cause respiratory depression: This is a theoretical risk that is not supported by clinical or empirical experience. Tolerance to respiratory and CNS depressant effects occurs rapidly and reliably.

Recommendations include the following:

  • Reassure patients that their addiction histories will not prevent adequate pain management, and discuss plans in a nonjudgmental manner.
  • Verify methadone and buprenorphine doses with clinics or prescribing physicians, and inform these physicians of any benzodiazepines or opioids given that may be detected on urine drug screening.
  • Aggressively treat pain with conventional opioid analgesics. Opioid cross-tolerance often necessitates higher opioid analgesic doses at shorter intervals.
  • Use continuous scheduled dosing orders rather than as-needed orders.
  • For patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy: Continue methadone maintenance dose and add short-acting opioid analgesics.
  • For patients receiving buprenorphine maintenance therapy: Pain management with opioids is complicated by the high affinity of buprenorphine for the mu receptor. This affinity may cause buprenorphine to compete with opioid analgesics at mu receptors. As buprenorphine's rate of dissociation from mu receptors is highly variable, naloxone should be available, and consciousness and respiration should be closely monitored.

Several options are possible, and the most effective approach will be determined with increasing clinical experience:

  • Continue BMT and titrate a short-acting opioid analgesic to effect.
  • Divide buprenorphine dose to 6-8 hours to take advantage of its short-acting analgesic properties.
  • Discontinue BMT, implement opioid analgesia, and restart BMT when opioid analgesia is no longer necessary.
  • In the hospitalized patient, discontinue BMT, initiate MMT, and add short-acting opioids to treat pain. Have naloxone at bedside. Convert back to BMT prior to discharge from hospital.
Proceed to Medication
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Adrian Preda, MD  Health Sciences Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California Irvine School of Medicine

Adrian Preda, MD is a member of the following medical societies: International Congress of Schizophrenia Research, Schizophrenia International Research Society, and Society of Biological Psychiatry

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Barry I Liskow, MD  Professor of Psychiatry, Vice Chairman, Psychiatry Department, Director, Psychiatric Residency Program, University of Kansas School of Medicine; Director, Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic, The University of Kansas Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Harold H Harsch, MD  Program Director of Geropsychiatry, Department of Geriatrics/Gerontology, Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Department of Medicine, Froedtert Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin

Harold H Harsch, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Psychiatric Association

Disclosure: lilly Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Forest Labs None None; Pfizer Grant/research funds Speaking and teaching; Northstar None None; Novartis Grant/research funds research; Pfizer Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Sunovion Speaking and teaching; Otsuke Grant/research funds reseach; GlaxoSmithKline Grant/research funds research; Merck Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Chief Editor

Eduardo Dunayevich, MD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati; Clinical Research Physician, Neuroscience, Lilly Research Laboratories

Eduardo Dunayevich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Psychiatric Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors Ziaur Rehman, MD, Suzan Khoromi, MD, James E Douglas, MD, Steven A Adelman, MD, and William J Meehan, MD, PhD to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Younger JW, Chu LF, D'Arcy NT, et al. Prescription opioid analgesics rapidly change the human brain. Pain. Aug 2011;152(8):1803-10. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  2. Wang J, Christo PJ. The influence of prescription monitoring programs on chronic pain management. Pain Physician. May-Jun 2009;12(3):507-15. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  3. SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studeis. Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and National Findings. 2007;[Full Text].

  4. Bohnert AS, Valenstein M, Bair MJ, Ganoczy D, McCarthy JF, Ilgen MA, et al. Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA. Apr 6 2011;305(13):1315-21. [Medline].

  5. Reimer J, Verthein U, Karow A, et al. Physical and mental health in severe opioid-dependent patients within a randomized controlled maintenance treatment trial. Addiction. Sep 2011;106(9):1647-55. [Medline].

  6. Grella CE, Lovinger K. 30-Year trajectories of heroin and other drug use among men and women sampled from methadone treatment in California. Drug Alcohol Depend. Nov 1 2011;118(2-3):251-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association;. 2000.

  8. Martin BC, Fan MY, Edlund MJ, et al. Long-term chronic opioid therapy discontinuation rates from the TROUP study. J Gen Intern Med. Dec 2011;26(12):1450-7. [Medline].

  9. Saxon AJ, Oreskovich MR, Brkanac Z. Genetic determinants of addiction to opioids and cocaine. Harv Rev Psychiatry. Jul-Aug 2005;13(4):218-32. [Medline].

  10. Amato L, Davoli M, A Perucci C, et al. An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of opiate maintenance therapies: available evidence to inform clinical practice and research. J Subst Abuse Treat. Jun 2005;28(4):321-9. [Medline].

  11. Simoens S, Matheson C, Bond C, et al. The effectiveness of community maintenance with methadone or buprenorphine for treating opiate dependence. Br J Gen Pract. Feb 2005;55(511):139-46. [Medline].

  12. Ling W, Amass L, Shoptaw S, et al. A multi-center randomized trial of buprenorphine-naloxone versus clonidine for opioid detoxification: findings from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network. Addiction. Aug 2005;100(8):1090-100. [Medline].

  13. McCance-Katz EF. Office-based buprenorphine treatment for opioid-dependent patients. Harv Rev Psychiatry. Nov-Dec 2004;12(6):321-38. [Medline].

  14. [Best Evidence] Ling W, Casadonte P, Bigelow G, Kampman KM, Patkar A, Bailey GL, et al. Buprenorphine implants for treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. Oct 13 2010;304(14):1576-83. [Medline].

  15. Gowing L, Farrell M, Bornemann R. Substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;[Medline].

  16. Tsui JI, Herman DS, Kettavong M, Anderson BJ, Stein MD. Escitalopram is associated with reductions in pain severity and pain interference in opioid dependent patients with depressive symptoms. Pain. Nov 2011;152(11):2640-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  17. [Best Evidence] Comer SD, Sullivan MA, Yu E, et al. Injectable, sustained-release naltrexone for the treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. Feb 2006;63(2):210-8. [Medline].

  18. Krupitsky E, Nunes EV, Ling W, et al. Injectable extended-release naltrexone for opioid dependence: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. Apr 30 2011;377(9776):1506-13. [Medline].

  19. Zhang XL, Shi J, Zhao LY, Sun LL, Wang J, Wang GB. Effects of stress on decision-making deficits in formerly heroin-dependent patients after different durations of abstinence. Am J Psychiatry. Jun 2011;168(6):610-6. [Medline].

  20. Passetti F, Clark L, Davis P, et al. Risky decision-making predicts short-term outcome of community but not residential treatment for opiate addiction. Implications for case management. Drug Alcohol Depend. Oct 1 2011;118(1):12-8. [Medline].

  21. Kleber HD, Gold MS, Riordan CE. The use of clonidine in detoxification from opiates. Bull Narc. 1980;32(2):1-10. [Medline].

  22. Gowing L, Ali R, White J. Buprenorphine for the management of opioid withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;[Medline].

  23. Gowing L, Farrell M, Ali R. Alpha2 adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;[Medline].

  24. [Best Evidence] Kunoe N, Lobmaier P, Vederhus JK, Hjerkinn B, Hegstad S, Gossop M, et al. Naltrexone implants after in-patient treatment for opioid dependence: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. Jun 2009;194(6):541-6. [Medline].

  25. [Best Evidence] Hulse GK, Morris N, Arnold-Reed D, Tait RJ. Improving clinical outcomes in treating heroin dependence: randomized, controlled trial of oral or implant naltrexone. Arch Gen Psychiatry. Oct 2009;66(10):1108-15. [Medline].

  26. Marsch LA, Bickel WK, Badger GJ, et al. Comparison of pharmacological treatments for opioid-dependent adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. Oct 2005;62(10):1157-64. [Medline].

  27. Amato L, Minozzi S, Davoli M, Vecchi S. Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Sep 7 2011;9:CD005031. [Medline].

  28. Morasco BJ, Gritzner S, Lewis L, et al. Systematic review of prevalence, correlates, and treatment outcomes for chronic non-cancer pain in patients with comorbid substance use disorder. Pain. Dec 22 2010;[Medline].

  29. Alford DP, Compton P, Samet JH. Acute pain management for patients receiving maintenance methadone or buprenorphine therapy. Ann Intern Med. Jan 17 2006;144(2):127-34. [Medline].

  30. Cicero TJ, Inciardi JA, Munoz A. Trends in abuse of Oxycontin and other opioid analgesics in the United States: 2002-2004. J Pain. Oct 2005;6(10):662-72. [Medline].

  31. Dertwinkel R, Wiebalck A, Zenz M. [Oral opioids for long-term treatment of chronic non-cancer pain]. Anaesthesist. Jun 1996;45(6):495-505. [Medline].

  32. Dobson KS. Historical and Philosophical bases of the cognitive-behavioral therapies. Handbook of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies. 1998;3-38.

  33. Fischer B, Rehm J, Kim G, Kirst M. Eyes wide shut?--A conceptual and empirical critique of methadone maintenance treatment. Eur Addict Res. 2005;11(1):1-9; discussion 10-4. [Medline].

  34. Gardner EL. Brain Reward Mechanisms. Substance Abuse- A Comprehensive Textbook. 1997;51-70.

  35. Herz A. Opioid reward mechanisms: a key role in drug abuse?. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. Mar 1998;76(3):252-8. [Medline].

  36. Jaffe JH. Opioid related disorders. Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ, eds. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. 6th ed. 1995.

  37. Jaffe JH, Jaffe AB. Opioid-related disorders. In: Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. Vol 1. 2000:1038-63.

  38. Kouyanou K, Pither CE, Wessely S. Medication misuse, abuse and dependence in chronic pain patients. J Psychosom Res. Nov 1997;43(5):497-504. [Medline].

  39. Li L, Smialek JE. Observations on Drug Abuse Deaths in The State of Maryland. J Forensic Sci. 1996;41:106-9. [Medline].

  40. Moskalewicz J, Sieroslawski J. [Mortality of narcotic addicts using injections]. Przegl Epidemiol. 1996;50(3):323-32. [Medline].

  41. Rounsaville BJ, Galanter M, Frawley PJ. Behavioral Therapies for Addiction. Principles of Addiction Medicine. 1998:595-690.

  42. Smith MO, Khan I. An acupuncture programme for the treatment of drug-addicted persons. Bull Narc. 1988;40(1):35-41. [Medline].

  43. Sporer KA. Strategies for preventing heroin overdose. British Medical Journal. 2003;326:442-444. [Medline].

  44. Stine S, Meandzija B, Kosten R. Pharmacologic Therapies for Opioid Addiction. Principles of Addiction Medicine. 1998:545-555.

Previous
Next
 
Schematic diagram of the brain-reward circuitry of the mammalian (laboratory rat) brain with sites at which various abusable substances appear to act to enhance brain-reward and, thus, to induce drug-taking behavior and possibly drug craving. Courtesy William & Wilkins Substance Abuse by Eliot L Gardner.KEY - Nucleus accumbens (Acc), ventral tegmental area (VTA), amygdala (AMYG), locus ceruleus (LC), dopaminergic mesolimbic system (DA), ventral pallidum (VP), noradrenergic fibers (NF), enkephalinergic outflow (ENK), frontal cortex (FCX), GABAergic inhibitory fiber system (GABA), dynorphinergic outflow (DYN),component of reward circuitry preferentially activated by electrical intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS).
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.