Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment & Management
- Author: Nader Kamangar, MD, FACP, FCCP, FCCM; Chief Editor: Zab Mosenifar, MD more...
Approach Considerations
Almost all major decisions regarding management of pneumonia address the initial assessment of severity. See Risk Stratification under Clinical Presentation.
Perhaps the most important initial determination is that of the need for hospitalization. In determining site or level of care, options include outpatient, medical ward care, or medical intensive care unit (ICU) management.
Consider using the pneumonia severity index (PSI) score as a guide for inpatient care and mortality risk. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has an interactive tool to calculate the PSI score.[34]
Note that the PSI score may underestimate the patient's need for admission (ie, a young otherwise healthy patient who is vomiting or has social factors that precludes him or her taking medicine). Conversely, the PSI score tends to overestimate the mortality in the higher risk patients.
Direct admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is mandated for any patient in septic shock with a requirement for vasopressors or with acute respiratory failure requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Transfer, if needed, is safe for a patient in otherwise stable condition who is being admitted for antibiotic therapy and pulmonary toilet. Patients who are severely ill and those with signs of respiratory failure, sepsis, and/or neutropenia must be stabilized before transfer.
Respiratory support
Antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment of bacterial pneumonia. However, patients who have bronchospasm with infection benefit from inhaled bronchodilators, administered by means of a nebulizer metered-dose inhaler.
For patients with mild shortness of breath, only supplemental oxygen with a nasal cannula may be required for ventilatory support. Administer ventilatory support when simple supplemental oxygen is not sufficient or when the patient cannot cope with the work of breathing.
Moderate dyspnea requires high oxygen concentrations, such as those provided by a Venti-mask or partial rebreathing face mask. Use these masks with caution in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients in respiratory failure or those with COPD who need high oxygen concentrations may require endotracheal intubation and ventilation.
An alternative to intubation may be use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask. Patients who are awake and can tolerate mask application may avoid intubation. However, in patients with productive cough, noninvasive ventilation is often avoided because it may impair clearance of respiratory secretions, which can lead to worsening infection and recurrent aspiration. Nasal CPAP is not usually as well tolerated as a full mask (which covers both the nose and mouth) in the emergent situation.
Fluid resuscitation
Patients with hypotension and/or tachycardia may benefit from an intravenous crystalloid bolus in the field. Many individuals with pneumonia also have volume depletion. In elderly patients with underlying cardiac disease, take care to avoid aggressive fluid administration, which may cause volume overload.
Empiric antibiotic therapy
Empiric therapy for the hospitalized patient should be initially broad and cover the likely causative organisms. Use caution in patients who are elderly or debilitated. If bacteremia is present in persons with pneumococcus who are older than 80 years, the mortality rate remains approximately 40%, even with treatment.
Many regions have guidelines for evaluation and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This usually includes a minimum time from door to antibiotic of 4 hours or less. Failure to abide by these time parameters may be associated with poor outcome. When in doubt, administer the first antibiotic dose.
Other initial treatments may include correction of electrolyte levels and chest physiotherapy (to assist in drainage of secretions).
See Antimicrobial Therapy.
Corticosteroids
The role of supplementing corticosteroids in patients with hypotension from septic shock remains controversial. Previously, it was recommended that septic patients who were hypotensive despite fluid resuscitation and vasopressor support be screened for occult adrenal insufficiency. However, current guidelines recommend empiric therapy with stress-dose steroids in these patients who remain hypotensive despite fluids and pressors, to avoid delay in treatment of presumed adrenal insufficiency.[57]
Drotrecogin alfa
A recombinant version of human activated protein C, drotrecogin alfa (Xigris) is the first immunomodulatory drug approved for the treatment of severe sepsis. It is recommended in patients with CAP who have persistent septic shock despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Its use is recommended in patients at high risk of death.
Drotrecogin alfa was withdrawn from the worldwide market October 25, 2011 after analysis of the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS)-SHOCK clinical trial. Drotrecogin alfa failed to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Trial results observed a 28-day all-cause mortality rate of 26.4% in patients treated with activated drotrecogin alfa compared with 24.2% in the placebo group of the study.
Antimicrobial Therapy
The goals of pharmacotherapy for bacteria pneumonia are to eradicate the infection, reduce morbidity, and prevent complications.
Treatment of pneumonia depends largely on the empiric use of antibiotic regimens directed against potential pathogens as determined by the setting in which the infection took place and the potential for exposure to multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms and other more virulent pathogens (ie, community-acquired pneumonia [CAP], healthcare-acquired pneumonia [HCAP], hospital-acquired pneumonia [HAP], ventilator-associated pneumonia [VAP]). Discussion of empiric antibiotic therapy can be based on hospitalization status.
The information in this section is derived mainly from the current Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) guidelines for the management of CAP.[16] These guidelines have been assessed in research studies since their release, with evidence of improved health outcomes, decreased length of hospital stay, and overall decreased mortality in patients hospitalized with CAP.[58, 59]
As discussed earlier, initial empiric therapy for hospitalized patients should be broad and cover the likely causative organisms. Direct the use of antibiotic agents in bacterial pneumonia based on laboratory data as well as clinical response.
The possibility of Legionella infection should always be considered when evaluating CAP, because delayed treatment significantly increases mortality. The most prevalent causative organism is S pneumoniae, regardless of the host or the setting; empiric therapy must be selected with this consideration in mind.
Antibiotics and HAP and VAP
The prevalence and resistance patterns of MDR pathogens vary between institutions and even between ICUs within the same institution; therefore, appropriate initial antibiotic therapy for HAP and VAP may vary markedly according to hospital site. Antimicrobial prescribing practices should not necessarily be based on national guidelines, but rather on patterns of MDR organisms at individual institutions.[5]
The table below presents first- and second-line antibiotic choices for specific organisms that cause bacterial pneumonia.
Table. Pathogen-Driven Antibiotic Choices[16] (Open Table in a new window)
| Organism | First-Line Antimicrobials | Alternative Antimicrobials | |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae | |||
| Penicillin susceptible (MIC < 2 mcg/mL) | Penicillin G, amoxicillin | Macrolide, cephalosporin (oral or parenteral), clindamycin, doxycycline, respiratory fluoroquinolone | |
| Penicillin resistant (MIC ≥2 mcg/mL) | Agents chosen on the basis of sensitivity | Vancomycin, linezolid, high-dose amoxicillin (3 g/d with MIC ≤4 mcg/mL | |
| Staphylococcus aureus | |||
| Methicillin susceptible | Antistaphylococcal penicillin | Cefazolin, clindamycin | |
| Methicillin resistant | Vancomycin, linezolid | Trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole | |
| Haemophilus influenzae | |||
| Non–beta-lactamase producing | Amoxicillin | Fluoroquinolone, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin | |
| Beta-lactamase producing | Second- or third-generation cephalosporin, amoxicillin/clavulanate | Fluoroquinolone, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin | |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae | Macrolide, tetracycline | Fluoroquinolone | |
| Chlamydophila pneumoniae | Macrolide, tetracycline | Fluoroquinolone | |
| Legionella species | Fluoroquinolone, azithromycin | Doxycycline | |
| Chlamydophila psittaci | Tetracycline | Macrolide | |
| Coxiella burnetii | Tetracycline | Macrolide | |
| Francisella tularensis | Doxycycline | Gentamicin, streptomycin | |
| Yersinia pestis | Streptomycin, gentamicin | Doxycycline, fluoroquinolone | |
| Bacillus anthracis (inhalational) | Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, doxycycline | Other fluoroquinolones, beta-lactam (if susceptible), rifampin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | Third-generation cephalosporin, carbapenem | Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor, fluoroquinolone | |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Antipseudomonal beta-lactam plus ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or aminoglycoside | Aminoglycoside plus ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin | |
| Bordetella pertussis | Macrolide | Trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole | |
| Anaerobe (aspiration) | Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor, clindamycin | Carbapenem | |
| MIC = Minimal inhibitory concentration. | |||
Outpatient Empiric Antibiotic Therapy
Antibiotic choices in the outpatient setting should be driven by the presence of patient risk factors, including recent exposure to antibiotics, comorbidities, and local trends in antibiotic resistance.
In previously healthy patients with no exposure to antibiotics within the previous 90 days, use a macrolide or doxycycline (weak recommendation).
In patients with comorbidities such as chronic disease of the heart, lung, liver, or kidneys; diabetes mellitus; alcoholism; malignancy; immunosuppression (drug- or disease-induced); or use of antimicrobials within the last 90 days, use a respiratory fluoroquinolone or beta-lactam plus a macrolide.
If the patient was exposed to antibiotics within the previous 90 days for systemic treatment of any type of bacterial infection, an alternative agent from a different class should be selected for treatment of the current illness.
Inpatient Empiric Antibiotic Therapy
According to the 2009 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Joint Commission consensus guidelines, inpatient treatment of pneumonia should be given within 6 hours of hospital admission (or in the emergency department if this is where the patient initially presented) and should consist of the following antibiotic regimens,[60] which are also in accordance with IDSA/ATS guidelines.[16]
For non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients, choose one option below:
- Beta-lactam (intravenous [IV] or intramuscular [IM] administration) plus macrolide (IV or oral [PO])
- Beta-lactam (IV or IM) plus doxycycline (IV or PO)
- Antipneumococcal quinolone monotherapy (IV or IM)
- If the patient is younger than 65 years with no risk factors for drug-resistant organisms, administer macrolide monotherapy (IV or PO)
For ICU patients, choose one option below:
- IV beta-lactam plus IV macrolide
- IV beta-lactam plus IV antipneumococcal quinolone
- If the patient has a documented beta-lactam allergy, administer IV antipneumococcal quinolone plus IV aztreonam
For patients at increased risk of infection with Pseudomonas (acceptable for both ICU and non-ICU patients), choose one option below:
- IV antipseudomonal beta-lactam plus IV antipseudomonal quinolone (PO quinolone in non-ICU patients only)
- IV antipseudomonal beta-lactam plus IV aminoglycoside plus one of the following: (1) IV macrolide; (2) IV antipneumococcal quinolone (PO in non-ICU patients only); or (3) if the patient has a documented beta-lactam allergy, administer IV aztreonam plus IV aminoglycoside plus IV antipneumococcal quinolone (PO quinolone in non-ICU only)
- The question of the need for “double coverage” for possible drug-resistant pseudomonal organisms often arises when treating critically ill patients. The use of 2 antipseudomonal medications should only be considered in critically ill patients who are at high risk for infection with drug-resistant organisms. Double coverage should be given as initial therapy early in the course of treatment, if at all, in order to make an impact in the disease course.
Aspiration Pneumonia Empiric Therapy
Although the causative organisms in aspiration pneumonia have been noted to be similar to those of CAP or HCAP, patients with severe periodontal disease, putrid sputum, or a history of alcoholism with suspected aspiration pneumonia may be at greater risk of anaerobic infection. One of the following antibiotic regimens is suggested for such patients:[9, 16]
- Piperacillin-tazobactam
- Imipenem
- Clindamycin or metronidazole plus a respiratory fluoroquinolone plus ceftriaxone
MRSA Empiric Antibiotic Therapy
For suspected infection with methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA), vancomycin or linezolid may be added to the antibiotic regimen until the organism's identity and antibiotic sensitivities are known, at which point the medications can be adjusted accordingly. Note, however, that when 9 studies were combined in a meta-analysis, linezolid was not superior in terms of higher cure rates for MRSA pneumonia when compared with the glycopeptides vancomycin and teicoplanin.[61] In addition, neither vancomycin nor linezolid is an optimal agent for the treatment of methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA).[16]
Other agents that may be considered for use against MRSA include clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and rifampin. More antibiotics are being evaluated for activity against MRSA.[62]
Bacterial Pneumonia and Viral Infection
The influenza pandemic of 1918 was responsible for the deaths of approximately 40-50 million people worldwide (>600,000 deaths in the United States), many of which were likely ultimately due to secondary bacterial infection.[14]
With the 2009 H1N1 influenza A pandemic, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) mortality estimates range from 8,800 to 18,000 between April 2009 and April 2010. The vast majority of deaths occurred in individuals younger than 65 years.[63] Evaluation of 77 postmortem lung specimens by the CDC revealed that 29% of those that died also had evidence of bacterial coinfection.[64]
Such statistics highlight the importance of the prevention of influenza spread with vaccination and treatment with antiviral drugs, as well as place focus on the diagnosis of, treatment of, and prophylaxis against bacterial pathogens with appropriate antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination.[14]
Supportive Measures
Supportive measures include the following (some were mentioned previously):
- Analgesia and antipyretics
- Chest physiotherapy
- Intravenous fluids (and, conversely, diuretics) if indicated
- Monitoring – Pulse oximetry with or without cardiac monitoring, as indicated
- Oxygen supplementation
- Positioning of the patient to minimize aspiration risk
- Respiratory therapy, including treatment with bronchodilators and N -acetylcysteine
- Suctioning and bronchial hygiene – Pulmonary toilet may include active suction of secretions, chest physiotherapy, positioning to promote dependent drainage, and incentive spirometry to enhance elimination of purulent sputum and to avoid atelectasis.
- Ventilation with low tidal volumes (6 mL/kg of ideal body weight) in patients requiring mechanical ventilation secondary to bilateral pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)[16]
- Systemic support may include proper hydration, nutrition, and mobilization to create a positive host milieu to fight infection and speed recovery. Early mobilization of patients, with encouragement to sit, stand, and walk when tolerated, speeds recovery.
Clinical Resolution
Clinical response to antibiotic therapy should be evaluated within 48-72 hours of initiation. With appropriate antibiotic therapy, improvement in the clinical manifestations of pneumonia should be observed in 48-72 hours. Because of the time required for antibiotics to act, antibiotics should not be changed within the first 72 hours unless marked clinical deterioration occurs. With pneumococcal pneumonia, the cough usually resolves within 8 days and crackles heard on auscultation clear within 3 weeks.
The timing of radiologic resolution of pneumococcal pneumonia varies with patient age and the presence or absence of an underlying lung disease. The chest radiograph usually clears within 4 weeks in patients younger than 50 years without underlying pulmonary disease. In contrast, resolution may be delayed for 12 weeks or longer in older individuals and those with underlying lung disease.
Pneumonia that does not respond to treatment poses a clinical dilemma and is a common concern. If patients do not improve within 72 hours, an organism that is not susceptible or is resistant to the initial empiric antibiotic regimen should be considered. Lack of response may also be secondary to a complication such as empyema or abscess formation.
Also consider broadening the differential diagnosis to include noninfectious etiologies such as malignancies, inflammatory conditions, or congestive heart failure. In patients in whom a precipitating factor was tumoral obstruction of an airway, the infiltrate may fail to clear, or the tumor may be depicted on a chest radiograph. Computed tomography (CT) scanning may be helpful in unclear cases and in delineating more complex pulmonary processes. Carefully review the patient's medical history, especially in regard to potential exposure. See Diagnosis.
Diagnostic testing may require more complex studies when the cause of disease is less apparent. Unresponsive cases of pneumonia may require fiberoptic bronchoscopy or open lung biopsy for definitive diagnosis. Bronchoscopy helps evaluate for obstruction due to a foreign body or malignancy; transbronchial biopsy may be helpful in some cases. Lung biopsy may need to be performed if all other procedures do not aid in diagnosis and the illness continues; biopsy may be performed under CT guidance, with the aid of thoracoscopy, or with open thoracotomy. See Workup.
Prevention
Prevention of CAP and nosocomial pneumonia are briefly discussed in this section.
Prevention of community-acquired pneumonia
Administration of influenza vaccine decreases fall and/or winter risk of viral influenza, which decreases the risk of bacterial superinfection. This vaccine is especially important in patients who are elderly and in those with comorbidity. In fact, influenza vaccination for elderly individuals results in a 48-57% reduction of the rate of hospitalization for pneumonia and influenza.
Unfortunately, although pneumococcal vaccines are effective, they are underused. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of fatal pneumonia and pneumonia overall. The incidence of pneumococcal disease is the highest in children younger than 2 years and in adults older than 65 years. Other important risk factors are chronic heart disease, chronic lung disease, cigarette smoking, and asplenia.
A 23-valent capsular polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax 23) and a 13-valent protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 13) are currently available in the United States. Both vaccines are efficacious in the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease. The role of the pneumococcal vaccine has not been defined as clearly as that of the influenza vaccine in adults. Pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine is approved for children aged 6 weeks to 5 years and adults aged 50 years or older. The pneumococcal 23-valent vaccine is approved for adults aged 50 years or older and persons aged 2 years or older who are at increased risk for pneumococcal disease.
The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice recommends the pneumococcal-23 vaccine for persons older than 65 years and for younger patients with chronic illnesses. In addition, administer pneumococcal vaccines to asplenic, transplant, and renal patients, as well as consider vaccinating individuals with comorbidities.
Emphasize smoking cessation to patients.
Go to Community-Acquired Pneumonia for complete information on this topic.
Prevention of nosocomial pneumonia
A number of preventative strategies have been applied in the prevention of nosocomial pneumonia. Some of these probably are effective or promising, and some are currently being evaluated.
The efficacious regimens are hand washing and isolation of patients with multiple resistant respiratory tract pathogens. Hand washing between patient contacts is a basic and often neglected behavior by medical personnel.
Interventions that should be considered or undertaken include nutritional support, attention to the size and nature of the gastrointestinal reservoir of microorganisms, careful handling of ventilator tubing and associated equipment, subglottic secretion drainage, and lateral-rotation bed therapy.
Go to Nosocomial Pneumonia for complete information on this topic.
Complications
Potential complications of bacterial pneumonia include the following:
- Destruction and fibrosis/organization of lung parenchyma, with scarring potential
- Bronchiectasis
- Necrotizing pneumonia
- Frank cavitation
- Empyema
- Pulmonary abscess
- Respiratory failure
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome
- Ventilator dependence
- Superinfection
- Death
Consultations
Consultation with infectious disease and/or pulmonary specialists is suggested in difficult cases. In addition, a pharmacist and/or infection control specialist may be of assistance in providing information on hospital or regional bacterial resistance and sensitivity patterns.
Patients requiring noninvasive mechanical ventilation or intubation may need consultation with a critical care medicine specialist to aid in management after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Long-Term Monitoring
When a patient with bacterial pneumonia is treated in an outpatient setting, arranging adequate follow-up evaluations is mandatory. The patient should also be instructed to return if their condition deteriorates.
Patients should have a follow-up chest radiograph in approximately 6 weeks to ensure resolution of consolidation and to assess persistent abnormality of the lung parenchyma (eg, scarring, bronchiectasis). Chest radiograph findings indicating nonresolution of symptoms should raise the consideration of an endobronchial obstruction as a cause of postobstructive pneumonia. A computed tomograph (CT) scan may be of benefit in these cases.
Although guidelines have routinely recommended follow-up chest radiography in order to exclude underlying lung cancer, studies have found that the incidence of lung cancer following pneumonia is relatively low. A study by Tang et al suggests that age 50 years and above, male sex, and smoking are the only characteristics independently associated with a new lung cancer diagnosis.[65]
Stedman's Medical Dictionary. 27th ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2003.
Brundage JF, Shanks GD. Deaths from bacterial pneumonia during 1918-19 influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis. Aug 2008;14(8):1193-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Anand N, Kollef MH. The alphabet soup of pneumonia: CAP, HAP, HCAP, NHAP, and VAP. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. Feb 2009;30(1):3-9. [Medline].
El Solh AA. Nursing home-acquired pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. Feb 2009;30(1):16-25. [Medline].
Kuti JL, Shore E, Palter M, Nicolau DP. Tackling empirical antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in your ICU: guidance for implementing the guidelines. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. Feb 2009;30(1):102-15. [Medline].
Eggimann P, Pittet D. Infection control in the ICU. Chest. Dec 2001;120(6):2059-93. [Medline].
Gaynes R, Edwards JR. Overview of nosocomial infections caused by gram-negative bacilli. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 15 2005;41(6):848-54. [Medline].
Peleg AY, Hooper DC. Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med. May 13 2010;362(19):1804-13. [Medline].
Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med. Mar 1 2001;344(9):665-71. [Medline].
Mizgerd JP. Acute lower respiratory tract infection. N Engl J Med. Feb 14 2008;358(7):716-27. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Rubins JB, Janoff EN. Pneumolysin: a multifunctional pneumococcal virulence factor. J Lab Clin Med. Jan 1998;131(1):21-7. [Medline].
Sadikot RT, Blackwell TS, Christman JW, Prince AS. Pathogen-host interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jun 1 2005;171(11):1209-23. [Medline]. [Full Text].
McCullers JA. Insights into the interaction between influenza virus and pneumococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev. Jul 2006;19(3):571-82. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS. Predominant role of bacterial pneumonia as a cause of death in pandemic influenza: implications for pandemic influenza preparedness. J Infect Dis. Oct 1 2008;198(7):962-70. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Forgie S, Marrie TJ. Healthcare-associated atypical pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. Feb 2009;30(1):67-85. [Medline].
[Guideline] Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 1 2007;44 Suppl 2:S27-72. [Medline].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pneumonia. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/Features/Pneumonia/. Accessed January 13, 2011.
Restrepo MI, Anzueto A. The role of gram-negative bacteria in healthcare-associated pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. Feb 2009;30(1):61-6. [Medline].
Bacterial coinfections in lung tissue specimens from fatal cases of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) - United States, May-August 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Oct 2 2009;58(38):1071-4. [Medline].
2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in pregnant women requiring intensive care - New York City, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Mar 26 2010;59(11):321-6. [Medline].
Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, et al. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. Jun 6 2001;285(21):2763-73. [Medline].
Rello J, Ollendorf DA, Oster G, Vera-Llonch M, Bellm L, Redman R, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest. Dec 2002;122(6):2115-21. [Medline].
American Lung Association. Trends in pneumonia and influenza morbidity and mortality. September 2008. American Lung Association. Available at http://bit.ly/gwYJAE. Accessed January 13, 2011.
Kung HC, Hoyert DL, Xu JQ, Murphy SL, and the Division of Vital Statistics. Deaths: final data for 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics April 2008: 56(10). http://www.cdc.gov. Available at http://bit.ly/i3ATH5. Accessed January 13, 2011.
Mufson MA, Stanek RJ. Bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia in one American City: a 20-year longitudinal study, 1978-1997. Am J Med. Jul 26 1999;107(1A):34S-43S. [Medline].
Cillóniz C, Ewig S, Polverino E, Marcos MA, Esquinas C, Gabarrús A, et al. Microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia and its relation to severity. Thorax. Apr 2011;66(4):340-6. [Medline].
van der Poll T, Opal SM. Pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of pneumococcal pneumonia. Lancet. Oct 31 2009;374(9700):1543-56. [Medline].
Slovis BS, Brigham KL. Cecil Essentials of Medicine. In: : Andreoli T, Carpenter CCJ, Griggs RC, Loscalzo J. Approach to the patient with respiratory disease. 6th ed. WB Saunders Co: Philadelphia, Pa; 2004:177-80.
Claudius I, Baraff LJ. Pediatric emergencies associated with fever. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Feb 2010;28(1):67-84, vii-viii. [Medline].
Brown SM, Jones BE, Jephson AR, Dean NC. Validation of the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society 2007 guidelines for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med. Dec 2009;37(12):3010-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Fang WF, Yang KY, Wu CL, Yu CJ, Chen CW, Tu CY, et al. Application and comparison of scoring indices to predict outcomes in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia. Crit Care. Jan 19 2011;15(1):R32. [Medline].
Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karalus N, Town GI, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. May 2003;58(5):377-82. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. Jan 23 1997;336(4):243-50. [Medline].
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Pneumonia severity index calculator. Available at http://pda.ahrq.gov/clinic/psi/psicalc.asp. Accessed January 13, 2011.
Sligl WI, Majumdar SR, Marrie TJ. Triaging severe pneumonia: what is the "score" on prediction rules?. Crit Care Med. Dec 2009;37(12):3166-8. [Medline].
Phua J, See KC, Chan YH, Widjaja LS, Aung NW, Ngerng WJ, et al. Validation and clinical implications of the IDSA/ATS minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. Jul 2009;64(7):598-603. [Medline].
Bloos F, Marshall JC, Dellinger RP, et al. Multinational, observational study of procalcitonin in ICU patients with pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: a multicenter observational study. Crit Care. Mar 7 2011;15(2):R88. [Medline].
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. Oct 1985;13(10):818-29. [Medline].
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. Dec 22-29 1993;270(24):2957-63. [Medline].
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. Jul 1996;22(7):707-10. [Medline].
El-Solh AA, Alhajhusain A, Abou Jaoude P, Drinka P. Validity of severity scores in hospitalized patients with nursing home-acquired pneumonia. Chest. Dec 2010;138(6):1371-6. [Medline].
España PP, Capelastegui A, Gorordo I, Esteban C, Oribe M, Ortega M, et al. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Dec 1 2006;174(11):1249-56. [Medline].
Rello J, Rodriguez A, Lisboa T, Gallego M, Lujan M, Wunderink R. PIRO score for community-acquired pneumonia: a new prediction rule for assessment of severity in intensive care unit patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med. Feb 2009;37(2):456-62. [Medline].
Charles PG, Wolfe R, Whitby M, Fine MJ, Fuller AJ, Stirling R, et al. SMART-COP: a tool for predicting the need for intensive respiratory or vasopressor support in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. Aug 1 2008;47(3):375-84. [Medline].
Bafadhel M, Clark TW, Reid C, Medina MJ, Batham S, Barer MR, et al. Procalcitonin and C reactive protein in hospitalised adult patients with community acquired pneumonia, exacerbation of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. Oct 28 2010;[Medline].
Skerrett SJ. Diagnostic testing for community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Chest Med. Sep 1999;20(3):531-48. [Medline].
Smith PR. What diagnostic tests are needed for community-acquired pneumonia?. Med Clin North Am. Nov 2001;85(6):1381-96. [Medline].
Ketai L, Jordan K, Marom EM. Imaging infection. Clin Chest Med. Mar 2008;29(1):77-105, vi. [Medline].
Cooper MS, Stewart PM. Corticosteroid insufficiency in acutely ill patients. N Engl J Med. Feb 20 2003;348(8):727-34. [Medline].
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. Nov 8 2001;345(19):1368-77. [Medline].
Kang YA, Kwon SY, Yoon HI, Lee JH, Lee CT. Role of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in differentiation of tuberculosis from bacterial community acquired pneumonia. Korean J Intern Med. Dec 2009;24(4):337-42. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Pirracchio R, Mateo J, Raskine L, Rigon MR, Lukaszewicz AC, Mebazaa A, et al. Can bacteriological upper airway samples obtained at intensive care unit admission guide empiric antibiotherapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia?. Crit Care Med. Sep 2009;37(9):2559-63. [Medline].
Gharib AM, Stern EJ. Radiology of pneumonia. Med Clin North Am. Nov 2001;85(6):1461-91, x. [Medline].
Tarver RD, Teague SD, Heitkamp DE, Conces DJ Jr. Radiology of community-acquired pneumonia. Radiol Clin North Am. May 2005;43(3):497-512, viii. [Medline].
Gotway MB, Reddy GP, Webb WR, Elicker BM, Leung JW. High-resolution CT of the lung: patterns of disease and differential diagnoses. Radiol Clin North Am. May 2005;43(3):513-42, viii. [Medline].
Hussain AN, Kumar V. The lung. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, eds. Robbins and Cotran: Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Saunders; 2005:711-72.
[Guideline] Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med. Jan 2008;34(1):17-60. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Arnold FW, LaJoie AS, Brock GN, Peyrani P, Rello J, Menéndez R, et al. Improving outcomes in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia by adhering to national guidelines: Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization International cohort study results. Arch Intern Med. Sep 14 2009;169(16):1515-24. [Medline].
McCabe C, Kirchner C, Zhang H, Daley J, Fisman DN. Guideline-concordant therapy and reduced mortality and length of stay in adults with community-acquired pneumonia: playing by the rules. Arch Intern Med. Sep 14 2009;169(16):1525-31. [Medline].
[Guideline] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Joint Commission. Specifications manual for national hospital inpatient quality measures. V. 2.6b. Manual download retrieved April 2009.
Kalil AC, Murthy MH, Hermsen ED, Neto FK, Sun J, Rupp ME. Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. Sep 2010;38(9):1802-8. [Medline].
Lam AP, Wunderink RG. The role of MRSA in healthcare-associated pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. Feb 2009;30(1):52-60. [Medline].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. H1N1 Flu: Updated CDC estimates of 2009 H1N1 influenza cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the United States April 2009 - April 10, 2010. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/estimates_2009_h1n1.htm. Accessed June 1, 2010.
Sullivan SJ, Jacobson RM, Dowdle WR, Poland GA. 2009 H1N1 influenza. Mayo Clin Proc. Jan 2010;85(1):64-76. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Tang KL, Eurich DT, Minhas-Sandhu JK, Marrie TJ, Majumdar SR. Incidence, correlates, and chest radiographic yield of new lung cancer diagnosis in 3398 patients with pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. Jul 11 2011;171(13):1193-8. [Medline].
Snijders D, Daniels JM, de Graaff CS, van der Werf TS, Boersma WG. Efficacy of corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. May 1 2010;181(9):975-82. [Medline].
FDA requests boxed warnings on fluoroquinolone antimicrobial drugs: seeks to strengthen warnings concerning increased risk of tendinitis and tendon rupture [press release]. Silver Spring, Md: US Food and Drug Administration; July 8, 2008. FDA. Available at http://bit.ly/fkBFeA. Accessed January 14, 2011.
US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Serious CNS reactions possible when linezolid (Zyvox®) is given to patients taking certain psychiatric medications. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm265305.htm. Accessed July 27, 2011.
Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM, Chambers HF, Saag MS. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy: 2010. 40th ed. Sperryville, Va: Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc; 2009.
| Organism | First-Line Antimicrobials | Alternative Antimicrobials | |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae | |||
| Penicillin susceptible (MIC < 2 mcg/mL) | Penicillin G, amoxicillin | Macrolide, cephalosporin (oral or parenteral), clindamycin, doxycycline, respiratory fluoroquinolone | |
| Penicillin resistant (MIC ≥2 mcg/mL) | Agents chosen on the basis of sensitivity | Vancomycin, linezolid, high-dose amoxicillin (3 g/d with MIC ≤4 mcg/mL | |
| Staphylococcus aureus | |||
| Methicillin susceptible | Antistaphylococcal penicillin | Cefazolin, clindamycin | |
| Methicillin resistant | Vancomycin, linezolid | Trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole | |
| Haemophilus influenzae | |||
| Non–beta-lactamase producing | Amoxicillin | Fluoroquinolone, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin | |
| Beta-lactamase producing | Second- or third-generation cephalosporin, amoxicillin/clavulanate | Fluoroquinolone, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin | |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae | Macrolide, tetracycline | Fluoroquinolone | |
| Chlamydophila pneumoniae | Macrolide, tetracycline | Fluoroquinolone | |
| Legionella species | Fluoroquinolone, azithromycin | Doxycycline | |
| Chlamydophila psittaci | Tetracycline | Macrolide | |
| Coxiella burnetii | Tetracycline | Macrolide | |
| Francisella tularensis | Doxycycline | Gentamicin, streptomycin | |
| Yersinia pestis | Streptomycin, gentamicin | Doxycycline, fluoroquinolone | |
| Bacillus anthracis (inhalational) | Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, doxycycline | Other fluoroquinolones, beta-lactam (if susceptible), rifampin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | Third-generation cephalosporin, carbapenem | Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor, fluoroquinolone | |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Antipseudomonal beta-lactam plus ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or aminoglycoside | Aminoglycoside plus ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin | |
| Bordetella pertussis | Macrolide | Trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole | |
| Anaerobe (aspiration) | Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor, clindamycin | Carbapenem | |
| MIC = Minimal inhibitory concentration. | |||

