eMedicine Specialties > Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Lumbar Spine Disorders

Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease

Author: Rajeev K Patel, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester - Strong Health Spine Center, University of Rochester - Strong Memorial Health System
Coauthor(s): Curtis W Slipman, MD, Director, University of Pennsylvania Spine Center, Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jan 18, 2007

Introduction

Background

Descriptions of treatment for low back pain (LBP) date to Hippocrates (460-370 BCE), who reported joint manipulation and use of traction. Onset of LBP often is associated with bipedal ambulation. Theories propose that this transformation in the mechanics of locomotion is the inciting evolutionary event that made the lumbar spine susceptible to degenerative disease. Degeneration is universal to structures that comprise the functional spinal unit, composed of 2 adjacent vertebral bodies and the intervertebral disk. The disk and 2 zygapophyseal joints at the same level function as a trijoint complex.

As humans age, they endure both macrotraumas and microtraumas and undergo changes in body habitus that alter and redistribute biomechanical forces unevenly on the lumbar spine. Natural progression of degeneration of the lumbar segment with motion proceeds with characteristic anatomic, biomechanical, radiologic, and clinical findings in lumbar degenerative disk disease (LDDD).

Pathophysiology

Posterior elements of the lumbar spinal functional unit typically bear less weight than anterior elements in all positions. Anterior elements bear over 90% of forces transmitted through the lumbar spine in sitting; during standing, this portion decreases to approximately 80%. As the degenerative process progresses, relative anterior-to-posterior force transmission approaches parity. The spine functions best within a realm of static and dynamic stability. Bony architecture and associated specialized soft tissue structures, especially the intervertebral disk, provide static stability. Dynamic stability, however, is accomplished through a system of muscular and ligamentous supports acting in concert during various functional, occupational, and avocational activities.

The overall mechanical effect of these structures maintains the histologic integrity of the trijoint complex. Net shear and compressive forces must be maintained below respective critical minima to maintain trijoint articulation integrity. Persistent, recurrent, nonmechanical, and/or excessive forces to the motion segment beyond minimal thresholds lead to microtrauma of the disk and facet joints, triggering and continuing the degenerative process. Degenerative cascade, described by Kirkaldy-Willis, is the widely accepted pathophysiologic model describing the degenerative process as it affects the lumbar spine and individual motion segments. This process occurs in 3 phases that comprise a continuum with gradual transition, rather than 3 clearly definable stages.

Phase I

The dysfunctional phase, or phase I, is characterized histologically by circumferential tears or fissures in the outer annulus. Tears can be accompanied by endplate separation or failure, interrupting blood supply to the disk and impairing nutritional supply and waste removal. Such changes may be the result of repetitive microtrauma. Since the outer one third of the annular wall is innervated, tears or fissures in this area may be painful. Strong experimental evidence suggests that most episodes of LBP are a consequence of disk injury, rather than musculotendinous or ligamentous strain. Circumferential tears may coalesce to form radial tears. The nucleus pulposus may lose its normal water-imbibing abilities as a result of biochemical changes in aggregating proteoglycans.

Studies suggest proteoglycan destruction may result from an imbalance between the matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1). This imbalance results in diminished capacity for imbibing water, causing loss of nuclear hydrostatic pressure and leading to buckling of the annular lamellae. This phenomenon leads to increased focal segmental mobility and shear stress to the annular wall. Delamination and fissuring within the annulus can result. Annular delamination has been shown to occur as a separate and distinct event from annular fissures.

Microfractures of collagen fibrils in the annulus have been demonstrated with electron microscopy. MRI at this stage may reveal desiccation, disk bulging without herniation, or a high-intensity zone (HIZ) in the annulus. Structural alteration of the facet joint following disk degeneration is acknowledged widely, but this expected pathologic alteration does not necessarily follow. Changes associated with zygapophyseal joints during the dysfunctional phase may include synovitis and hypomobility. The facet joint may serve as a pain generator.

Phase II

The unstable phase, or phase II, may result from progressive loss of mechanical integrity of the trijoint complex. Disk-related changes include multiple annular tears (eg, radial, circumferential), internal disk disruption (IDD) and resorption, or loss of disk-space height. Concurrent changes in the zygapophyseal joints include cartilage degeneration, capsular laxity, and subluxation. The biomechanical result of these alterations leads to segmental instability. Clinical syndromes of segmental instability, IDD syndrome, and herniated disk seem to fit in this phase.

Phase III

The third and final phase, stabilization, is characterized by further disk resorption, disk-space narrowing, endplate destruction, disk fibrosis, and osteophyte formation. Diskogenic pain from such disks may have a higher incidence than that of the pain from the disks in phases I and II; however, great variation of phases can be expected in different disks in any given individual and individuals of similar ages vary greatly.

Frequency

United States

Lifetime incidence of LBP is reported to be 60-90% with annual incidence of 5%. Each year, 14.3% of new patient visits to primary care physicians are for LBP, and nearly 13 million physician visits are related to complaints of chronic LBP, according to the National Center for Health Statistics.

Mortality/Morbidity

The natural history has been reported to be favorable in some studies and is frequently quoted to patients. Reports indicate that 40-50% of patients are symptom-free within 1 week and up to 90% of symptoms resolve without medical attention in 6-12 weeks.
  • Deyo and Tsui-Wu reported that 33.2% of patients with LBP reported symptoms for less than 1 month, 33% reported pain for 1-5 months, and 32.7% reported pain for longer than 6 months (Deyo, 1987). More recently, 44% of patients reported chronic symptoms (defined as back pain for >90 d in the previous 6 mo) over 2-year follow-up. Most patients had low levels of back pain, with 20% rating their pain at 4 or greater on a scale of 0-10 (where 0 indicates no pain), 13% rated their pain as 5 or greater, and 8% reporting pain of 6 or greater. Von Korff et al reported that 15-20% of primary care patients with LBP had moderate-to-severe limitations in activity during 1-year follow-up after their initial episode resolved. Recurrence rates of 60-85% have been reported in the first 2 years after an acute episode of LBP (Von Korff, 1993).
  • Although incidence of LBP has remained relatively static, disability from LBP has increased 14 times the rate of population growth. Back pain results in more lost productivity than any other medical condition and is second only to upper respiratory complaints as cause of time lost from work. Back pain accounts for approximately 175.8 million days of restricted activity each year in the United States. At any given time, 2.4 million Americans are disabled because of LBP, with 1.2 million on a chronic basis. As of 2005, lower back pain ranks as the number one cause of disability in individuals under the age of 45.
  • In 1990, 400,000 industrial low back injuries resulted in disability in the United States. This number represents approximately 21% of injuries in the workplace but accounted for 31% of compensation payments. After a patient receiving worker's compensation is out of work for more than 6 months, the likelihood of his or her returning to work is only 50%. After 1 year, the likelihood is only 25%, and after 2 years, the individual will likely never return to productive work. In 1990, direct medical cost of spinal disorders was estimated to than $23 billion in the United States. Furthermore, plausible estimates of total costs of low back disorders ranged from $25 billion to almost $85 billion in 1990 (Frymoyer, 1996).More recently, Luo et al looked at statistics from 1998 and found total health care expenditures incurred by individuals with back pain in the United States to have reached $90.7 billion and total incremental expenditures attributable to back pain among these personswereapproximately$26.3billion. On average, individuals with back pain incurred health care expenditures that were approximately 60% higher than individuals without back pain ($3498 vs $2178). Of service expenditures, 75% were attributed to those individuals within the top 25% of expenditure. Disk disorders were also found to be associated with higher medical costs (Luo, 2005).

Sex

LBP secondary to degenerative disk disease affects men and women equally.

Age

LBP secondary to degenerative disk disease is a condition that affects young to middle-aged persons with peak incidence at approximately 40 years. With respect to radiologic evidence of LDDD, the prevalence of disk degeneration increases with age, but degenerated disks are not necessarily painful.

Clinical

History

The patient's history is an extremely valuable tool for identifying the intervertebral disk as the nociceptive source. Classic historic features are associated with a diskogenic etiology of mechanical low lumbar complaints. The clinician must ask several key questions to elicit the information necessary for correct diagnosis. These questions address events that cause the symptoms, the location and nature of the symptoms, any exacerbating and mitigating factors or positions, and the patients' medical and surgical history. Often, a nociceptive source of back pain is not found.

  • Patients with diskogenic pain typically describe an inciting traumatic event resulting in sudden forced flexion and/or rotational moment; however, some patients describe a spontaneous onset of symptoms.
  • Symptoms, usually isolated in the low lumbar region and buttocks, can vary, with referral to the lower thoracic and/or upper lumbar region, abdomen, flanks, groin, genitals, thighs, knees, calves, ankles, feet, and toes.
  • Classic diskogenic pain is exacerbated by activities that load the disk, such as sitting, arising from a seated position, awaking in the morning, lumbar flexion with and without rotation/twisting, lifting, vibration (eg, riding in a car), coughing, sneezing, laughing, and the Valsalva maneuver.
  • Symptoms are mitigated by lying on the side with hips and knees flexed (fetal position), by changing positions frequently, and/or by engaging in activity.
  • Diskogenic pain is usually described as aching; however, a wide spectrum of adjectives can be reported from soreness to stabbing pain.
  • Patients with a surgical history of lumbar arthrodesis, lumbar diskectomy, or lumbar laminectomy have changes in lumbar spine biomechanics resulting in susceptibility to diskogenic disease.
  • The patient's medical history should be investigated with specific inquiry directed toward a personal history of cancer, arthritis, or infection or systemic disease that could increase risk of infection.
  • The review of systems should include assessments for fever, incontinence, symptoms suggestive of metastasis or metabolic disease, and psychological issues including depression and drug use or abuse.

Physical

Physical examination is an important adjunct to history in determining diskogenic etiology of symptoms, beginning with the first view of the patient in the examination room. The patient may prefer to stand, pace, or sit in a reclining position since these positions usually alleviate symptoms of diskogenic etiology.

  • Note the patient's height and weight, as obesity may produce excess load to the low lumbar intervertebral disks.
  • Inspection of the low lumbar region is important since this part of the examination may offer a clue to history of lumbar surgery if a scar exists. Inspection while the patient is standing and during forward flexion and extension may reveal a kyphotic or scoliotic deformity. Inspection and palpatory examination should be performed in flexion with the patient standing and seated to determine whether the pain source is in the pelvis or sacral area.
  • Palpation of the lumbar paraspinals and spine stabilizers may elicit tenderness, as these muscles may be tight, have active or latent trigger or tender points, or be in reactive muscle spasm.
  • A step deformity, in which the spinous process of the segment involved protrudes ventrally, may exist as a consequence of spondylolisthesis.
  • Measure the lower extremity circumference at mid thigh and mid calf at the same time of day so comparable results are obtained; they should be symmetric. Hips, knees, and ankles should have full range of motion (ROM), without crepitus or effusions.
  • Diskogenic stress maneuvers usually reproduce the patient's low lumbar and buttock symptoms. These maneuvers include pelvic rocking and sustained hip flexion.
    • Perform pelvic rocking with the patient in a supine position. Flex the patient's hips until the flexed knees approximate to the chest; then, rotate the lower extremities from one side to the other.
    • Perform sustained hip flexion with the patient supine; raise the patient's extended lower extremities to approximately 60° in relation to the examination table. Then ask the patient to hold the lower extremities in that position and release. Query the patient regarding reproduction of low lumbar and/or buttock pain. Then lower the extremities successively approximately 15°, and, at each point, note the reproduction and intensity of pain. The test is positive if the patient complains of low lumbar and/or buttock pain of increasing intensity as the extremities are lowered at successive angles. Sacroiliac joint stress maneuvers do not provoke pain. Root tension signs are negative.
  • Orientation, mood, and affect usually are within normal limits, and excessive emotional lability may be a sign of nonorganic pathology. These provocative maneuvers should not be accompanied by exorbitant demonstrations of perceived pain. Such overt pain behavior should alert the clinician to important psychosocial issues.
  • Normal neurologic examination, with intact pinprick sensation throughout all dermatomes, full muscle strength throughout all myotomes, and symmetric muscle stretch reflexes, are associated with diskogenic disease. Two muscles should be tested with reflexes elicited representing each lumbar root; this test helps determine whether the problem is root pathology or a focal neuropathy; the straight leg test also should be performed in supine and seated positions.
  • Gait usually is normal.
  • Lumbar ROM usually is limited and painful, chiefly into flexion; however, extension also can be restricted and painful. Lumbar ROM should be assessed in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation. A careful, systematic, and thorough structural examination should be performed to assess for subtle abnormal findings that may be amenable to manual therapy or manipulation.

Causes

The cause of LDDD is unknown. Several theories cite traumatically induced acute annular tear as the inciting pathologic event. Other theories suggest that degeneration of the lumbar disk is a natural part of aging; however, these theories do not explain spontaneously occurring annular tears and disk degeneration in the young. Therefore, the cause of LDDD is most likely multifactorial. Various genetic, environmental, autoimmune, inflammatory, traumatic, infectious, toxin-induced, and other factors, alone or in various combinations, may result in initiation and progression of degeneration of the lumbar disks in a way that has not been elucidated.

More on Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease

Overview: Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease
Treatment & Medication: Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease
Follow-up: Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease
References

References

  1. Adams MA, McMillan DW, Green TP, Dolan P. Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine. Feb 15 1996;21(4):434-8. [Medline].

  2. Adams P, Eyre DR, Muir H. Biochemical aspects of development and ageing of human lumbar intervertebral discs. Rheumatol Rehabil. Feb 1977;16(1):22-9. [Medline].

  3. Aguila LA, Piraino DW, Modic MT, et al. The intranuclear cleft of the intervertebral disk: magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology. Apr 1985;155(1):155-8. [Medline].

  4. Ahn N, Imai Y, An H. Effect of nutrient concentration and OP-1 on the metabolism of intervertebral disc: In vitro organ culture study. Program and abstracts of the 17th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Soc. 2002.

  5. Andersson GB. Epidemiologic aspects on low-back pain in industry. Spine. Jan-Feb 1981;6(1):53-60. [Medline].

  6. Andersson GB, Schultz AB, Nachemson AL. Intervertebral disc pressures during traction. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1983;9:88-91. [Medline].

  7. Aoki J, Yamamoto I, Kitamura N, et al. End plate of the discovertebral joint: degenerative change in the elderly adult. Radiology. Aug 1987;164(2):411-4. [Medline].

  8. Aprill C, Bogduk N. High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. May 1992;65(773):361-9. [Medline].

  9. Bergquist-Ullman M, Larsson U. Acute low back pain in industry. A controlled prospective study with special reference to therapy and confounding factors. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;(170):1-117. [Medline].

  10. Bernard TN Jr. Lumbar discography followed by computed tomography. Refining the diagnosis of low-back pain. Spine. Jul 1990;15(7):690-707. [Medline].

  11. Biering-Sorensen F. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine. Mar 1984;9(2):106-19. [Medline].

  12. Bigos SJ, Battid MC. The impact of spinal disorders in industry. In: Frymoyer JW, ed. The Adult Spine. New York:. Raven Press;1991.

  13. Blair SN, Piserchia PV, Wilbur CS, Crowder JH. A public health intervention model for work-site health promotion. Impact on exercise and physical fitness in a health promotion plan after 24 months. JAMA. Feb 21 1986;255(7):921-6. [Medline].

  14. Block AR, Vanharanta H, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD. Discographic pain report: influence of psychological factors. Spine. Feb 1 1996;21(3):334-8. [Medline].

  15. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. Mar 1990;72(3):403-8. [Medline].

  16. Bogduk N, Modic MT. Lumbar discography. Spine. Feb 1 1996;21(3):402-4. [Medline].

  17. Bogduk N, Twomey LT. Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone;1991:161.

  18. Bogduk N, Tynan W, Wilson AS. The nerve supply to the human lumbar intervertebral discs. J Anat. Jan 1981;132(Pt 1):39-56. [Medline].

  19. Bogduk N. The innervation of the lumbar spine. Spine. Apr 1983;8(3):286-93. [Medline].

  20. Brickley-Parsons D, Glimcher MJ. Is the chemistry of collagen in intervertebral discs an expression of Wolff''s Law? A study of the human lumbar spine. Spine. Mar 1984;9(2):148-63. [Medline].

  21. Bush K, Cowan N, Katz DE, Gishen P. The natural history of sciatica associated with disc pathology: a prospective study with clinical and independent radiologic follow-up. Spine. Oct 1992;17(10):1205-12. [Medline].

  22. Butler D, Trafimow JH, Andersson GB, et al. Discs degenerate before facets. Spine. Feb 1990;15(2):111-3. [Medline].

  23. Butt WP. Lumbar discography. J Can Assoc Radiol. 1964;14:172.

  24. Cady LD Jr, Thomas PC, Karwasky RJ. Program for increasing health and physical fitness of fire fighters. J Occup Med. Feb 1985;27(2):110-4. [Medline].

  25. Cady LD Jr, Thomas PC, Karwasky RJ. Program for increasing health and physical fitness of fire fighters. J Occup Med. Feb 1985;27(2):110-4. [Medline].

  26. Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW. The economics of spinal disorders. In: Frymoyer JW, ed. The Adult Spine: Principles of Practice. New York, NY: Raven Press;1991.

  27. Colhoun E, McCall IW, Williams L, Cassar Pullicino VN. Provocation discography as a guide to planning operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. Mar 1988;70(2):267-71. [Medline].

  28. Coppes MH, Marani E, Thomeer RT, Groen GJ. Innervation of "painful" lumbar discs. Spine. Oct 15 1997;22(20):2342-9; discussion 2349-50. [Medline].

  29. Coventry MB, Ghormley RK, Kernohan JW. The intervertebral disc: its microscopic anatomy and pathology, III: pathologic changes in the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg. 1945;27(1):460.

  30. Crook HV. Internal disc disruption. In: Frymover JW, ed. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice. New York, NY: Raven;1991: 2015.

  31. DePalma AF, Rothman RH. The Invertebral Disc. Philadelphia, PA:. WB Saunders;1970.

  32. Dean DD, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, et al. Evidence for metalloproteinase and metalloproteinase inhibitor imbalance in human osteoarthritic cartilage. J Clin Invest. Aug 1989;84(2):678-85. [Medline].

  33. Derby R, Eek B, Ryan DP. Intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty. Presented at 13th Annual Meeting North American Spine Society 13th Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA, October 28-31, 1998.

  34. Derby R, Eek B, Van Peteghern PK, Ryan DP. Somatic referred pain patterns resulting from direct in vivo intradiscal thermal stimulation. Presented at Combined meeting of the International Spinal Injection Society and the Australian Faculty of Musculoskeletal Medicine Combined Meeting. Sydney, Australia,. September 26-27, 1998.

  35. Deyo RA, Bass JE. Lifestyle and low-back pain. The influence of smoking and obesity. Spine. May 1989;14(5):501-6. [Medline].

  36. Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Cancer as a cause of back pain: frequency, clinical presentation, and diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern Med. May-Jun 1988;3(3):230-8. [Medline].

  37. Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu YJ. Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States. Spine. Apr 1987;12(3):264-8. [Medline].

  38. Dixon ASJ. Diagnosis of low back pain: sorting the complainers. In: Jayson M, ed. The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain. New York, NY:. Grune and Stratton;1976.

  39. Donelson R, Aprill C, Medcalf R, Grant W. A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain. A predictor of symptomatic discs and anular competence. Spine. May 15 1997;22(10):1115-22. [Medline].

  40. Fordyce WE, Brockway JA, Bergman JA, Spengler D. Acute back pain: a control-group comparison of behavioral vs traditional management methods. J Behav Med. Apr 1986;9(2):127-40. [Medline].

  41. Forssell MZ. The back school. Spine. Jan-Feb 1981;6(1):104-6. [Medline].

  42. Freeman BJ, Fraser RD, Cain CM. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine. Nov 1 2005;30(21):2369-77; discussion 2378. [Medline].

  43. Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P, et al. Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet. Jul 19 1997;350(9072):178-81. [Medline].

  44. Fry J. Back pain and soft tissue rheumatism. In: Colloquium Proceedings of Advisory Services. London, England:. 1995.

  45. Frymoyer JW. Epidemiology: the magnitude of the problem. In: Wiesel SW, Weinstein JN, Herkowitz HH, Dvorak J, eds. The Lumbar Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co;1996.

  46. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Clements JH, et al. Risk factors in low-back pain: an epidemiological survey. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. Feb 1983;65(2):213-8. [Medline].

  47. Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med. Feb 4 1988;318(5):291-300. [Medline].

  48. Gonzalez VM, Goeppinger J, Lorig K. Four psychosocial theories and their application to patient education and clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res. Sep 1990;3(3):132-43. [Medline].

  49. Gower WE, Pedrini V. Age-related variations in proteinpolysaccharides from human nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and costal cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. Sep 1969;51(6):1154-62. [Medline].

  50. Grenier N, Greselle JF, Vital JM, et al. Normal and disrupted lumbar longitudinal ligaments: correlative MR and anatomic study. Radiology. Apr 1989;171(1):197-205. [Medline].

  51. Grenier N, Grossman RI, Schiebler ML, et al. Degenerative lumbar disk disease: pitfalls and usefulness of MR imaging in detection of vacuum phenomenon. Radiology. Sep 1987;164(3):861-5. [Medline].

  52. HHS. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC:. Government Printing Office;1989.

  53. Hadler NM. The predicament of backache. J Occup Med. May 1988;30(5):449-50. [Medline].

  54. Hazard RG, Fenwick JW, Kalisch SM, et al. Functional restoration with behavioral support: a one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine. Feb 1989;14(2):157-61. [Medline].

  55. Heliovaara M. Risk factors for low back pain and sciatica. Ann Med. Aug 1989;21(4):257-64. [Medline].

  56. Higuchi M, Kaneda K, Abe K. Postnatal histogenesis of the cartilage plate of the spinal column: electron microscopic observations. Spine. Mar-Apr 1982;7(2):89-96. [Medline].

  57. Hirsch C, Ingelmark BE, Miller M. The anatomical basis for low back pain. Acra Orthop Scand. 1963;23:1-17.

  58. Hopwood MB, Abram SE. Factors associated with failure of lumbar epidural steroids. Reg Anesth. Jul-Aug 1993;18(4):238-43. [Medline].

  59. Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Offord KP. Does preoperative antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with regional anesthesia?. Anesth Analg. Jun 1990;70(6):631-4. [Medline].

  60. Hurri H. The Swedish back school in chronic low back pain, I: benefits. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1989;21(1):33-40. [Medline].

  61. Hurri H. The Swedish back school in chronic low back pain, II: factors predicting the outcome. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1989;21(1):41-4. [Medline].

  62. Ito M, Incorvaia KM, Yu SF, et al. Predictive signs of discogenic lumbar pain on magnetic resonance imaging with discography correlation. Spine. Jun 1 1998;23(11):1252-8; discussion 1259-60. [Medline].

  63. Jackson HC 2d, Winkelmann RK, Bickel WH. Nerve endings in the human lumbar spinal column and related structures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. Oct 1966;48(7):1272-81. [Medline].

  64. Jaffray D, O''Brien JP. Isolated intervertebral disc resorption. A source of mechanical and inflammatory back pain. Spine. May 1986;11(4):397-401. [Medline].

  65. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby EA, et al. Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer back pain: a randomized prospective study. Spine. Dec 1 1998;23(23):2591-600. [Medline].

  66. Jamison RN, VadeBoncouer T, Ferrante FM. Low back pain patients unresponsive to an epidural steroid injection: identifying predictive factors. Clin J Pain. Dec 1991;7(4):311-7. [Medline].

  67. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. Jul 14 1994;331(2):69-73. [Medline].

  68. Kambin P, Zhou L. History and current status of percutaneous arthroscopic disc surgery. Spine. Dec 15 1996;21(24 Suppl):57S-61S. [Medline].

  69. Kawakami M. Histochemical and immunohistochemical demonstrations of nerve fibers on human paraspinal soft tissue [Japanese]. J Wakayama Med Soc. 1989;40:621-30.

  70. Kieffer SA, Sherry RG, Wellenstein DE, King RB. Bulging lumbar intervertebral disk: myelographic differentiation from herniated disk with nerve root compression. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1982;138(4):709-16. [Medline].

  71. Kirkaldy-Willis WH. The pathology and pathogenesis of low back pain. In: Managing Low Back Pain. New York, NY:. Churchill Livingstone;1988: 49.

  72. Klaber Moffett JA, Chase SM, Portek I, Ennis JR. A controlled, prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a back school in the relief of chronic low back pain. Spine. Mar 1986;11(2):120-2. [Medline].

  73. Koeller W, Muehlhaus S, Meier W, Hartmann F. Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression: influence of age and degeneration. J Biomech. 1986;19(10):807-16. [Medline].

  74. Komiya Y. Immunohistochernical localization of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) and stromelysin in human joint synovium. Jpn J Rheum Joint Surg. 1992;11:59-70.

  75. Kostuik JP, Harrington I, Alexander D, et al. Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. Mar 1986;68(3):386-91. [Medline].

  76. Kummel BM. Nonorganic signs of significance in low back pain. Spine. May 1 1996;21(9):1077-81. [Medline].

  77. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ. The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am. Apr 1991;22(2):181-7. [Medline].

  78. Kuslich SD, Ahern JW, Dowdle JD. The BAK method of lumbar interbody fusion-2 year follow-up results: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;. 1996.

  79. Kuslich SD, Ahern JW, Garner MD. An in-vivo, prospective analysis of tissue sensitivity of lumbar spinal tissues: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;. 1997.

  80. Lacroix JM, Powell J, Lloyd GJ, et al. Low-back pain. Factors of value in predicting outcome. Spine. Jun 1990;15(6):495-9. [Medline].

  81. Lee CK, Vessa P, Lee JK. Chronic disabling low back pain syndrome caused by internal disc derangements. The results of disc excision and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. Feb 1 1995;20(3):356-61. [Medline].

  82. Lipson SJ, Muir H. Experimental intervertebral disc degeneration: morphologic and proteoglycan changes over time. Arthritis Rheum. Jan 1981;24(1):12-21. [Medline].

  83. Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX. Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine. Jan 1 2004;29(1):79-86.

  84. Lutz GE, Vad VB, Wisneski RJ. Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: an outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Nov 1998;79(11):1362-6. [Medline].

  85. MacNaul KL, Chartrain N, Lark M, et al. Discoordinate expression of stromelysin, collagenase, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in rheumatoid human synovial fibroblasts. Synergistic effects of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on stromelysin expression. J Biol Chem. Oct 5 1990;265(28):17238-45. [Medline].

  86. Malinsky J. The ontogenetic development of nerve terminations in the intervertebral discs of man. (Histology of intervertebral discs, 11th communication). Acta Anat (Basel). 1959;38:96-113. [Medline].

  87. Manson JE, Tosteson H, Ridker PM, et al. The primary prevention of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. May 21 1992;326(21):1406-16. [Medline].

  88. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N, et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: a prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine. Jul-Aug 1985;10(6):482-93. [Medline].

  89. Mayer TG, Gatchel R, Mayer H, et al. A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back pain injury: an objective assessment procedure. JAMA. 1989;258:1763.

  90. McCarron RF, Wimpee MW, Hudkins PG, Laros GS. The inflammatory effect of nucleus pulposus: a possible element in the pathogenesis of low-back pain. Spine. Oct 1987;12(8):760-4. [Medline].

  91. McCoy CE, Selby D, Henderson R, et al. Patients avoiding surgery: pathology and one-year life status follow-up. Spine. Jun 1991;16(6 Suppl):S198-200. [Medline].

  92. McNally DS, Shackleford IM, Goodship AE, Mulholland RC. In vivo stress measurement can predict pain on discography. Spine. Nov 15 1996;21(22):2580-7. [Medline].

  93. Medical Economics. Physician Desk Reference. 54th ed. Montvale, NJ:. Medical Economics Company Inc;2000.

  94. Merriam WF, Quinnell RC, Stockdale HR, Willis DS. The effect of postural changes on the inferred pressures within the nucleus pulposus during lumbar discography. Spine. May-Jun 1984;9(4):405-8. [Medline].

  95. Miller JA, Schmatz C, Schultz AB. Lumbar disc degeneration: correlation with age, sex, and spine level in 600 autopsy specimens. Spine. Feb 1988;13(2):173-8. [Medline].

  96. Miyamoto K, Masuda K, Kim JG. Intradiscal injections of osteogenic protein-1 restore the viscoelastic properties of degenerated intervertebral discs. Spine J. Nov-Dec 2006;6(6):692-703.

  97. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS. Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology. Jul 1988;168(1):177-86. [Medline].

  98. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Carter JR. Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology. Jan 1988;166(1 Pt 1):193-9. [Medline].

  99. Moon SH, Lee HM, Park MS. Bone morphogenic protein-2 facilitates expression of chondrogenic not osteogenic phenotype in human intervertebral disc cells. Program and abstracts of the 17th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Soc. 2002.

  100. NCHS. National Center for Health Statistics. Prevalence of Selected Impairment. Hyattsville, MD:. US Department of Health and Human Services;1984.

  101. Nachemson A, Morris JM. In vivo measurements of intradiscal pressure: discometery, a method for the determination of pressure in the lower lumbar discs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1964;46:1077-92. [Medline].

  102. Nakamura S, Takahashi K, Takahashi Y, et al. Origin of nerves supplying the posterior portion of lumbar intervertebral discs in rats. Spine. Apr 15 1996;21(8):917-24. [Medline].

  103. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics of the United States. Washington, DC:. Government Printing Office;1968-1988.

  104. Ohnmeiss DD, Vanharanta H, Ekholm J. Degree of disc disruption and lower extremity pain. Spine. Jul 15 1997;22(14):1600-5. [Medline].

  105. Palmgren T, Gronblad M, Virri J, et al. Immunohistochemical demonstration of sensory and autonomic nerve terminals in herniated lumbar disc tissue. Spine. Jun 1 1996;21(11):1301-6. [Medline].

  106. Panagiotacopulos ND, Pope MH, Krag MH, Block R. Water content in human intervertebral discs, I: Measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. Nov 1987;12(9):912-7. [Medline].

  107. Parker LM, Murrell SE, Boden SD, Horton WC. The outcome of posterolateral fusion in highly selected patients with discogenic low back pain. Spine. Aug 15 1996;21(16):1909-16; discussion 1916-7. [Medline].

  108. Plowman SA. Physical activity, physical fitness, and low back pain. In: Holloszy JO, ed. Exercise and Sport Science Review. Vol 20. Philadelphia, PA:. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;1992.

  109. Praemer A, Furrier S, Rice DP. Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States. Rosemont, IL:. American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons;1992: 23-33.

  110. Pritzker KP. Aging and degeneration in the lumbar intervertebral disc. Orthop Clin North Am. Jan 1977;8(1):66-77. [Medline].

  111. Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: a monograph for clinicians. Spine. Sep 1987;12(7 Suppl):S1-59. [Medline].

  112. Resnick D. Degenerative diseases of the vertebral column. Radiology. Jul 1985;156(1):3-14. [Medline].

  113. Resnick D, Niwayama G, Guerra J Jr, et al. Spinal vacuum phenomena: anatomical study and review. Radiology. May 1981;139(2):341-8. [Medline].

  114. Ricketson R, Simmons JW, Hauser BO. The prolapsed intervertebral disc. The high-intensity zone with discography correlation. Spine. Dec 1 1996;21(23):2758-62. [Medline].

  115. Riew KD, Yin Y, Gilula L, et al. Can nerve root injections obviate the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain? A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Presented at the 14th Annual North American Spine Society Meeting. Chicago, IL, October 20-23, 1999.

  116. Robecchi A, Capra R. L'idrocortisone (composto F): prime esperienze cliniche in campo reumatologico. Minerva Med. 1952;98:1259-63.

  117. Ross JS, Modic MT, Masaryk TJ. Tears of the anulus fibrosus: assessment with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Nov-Dec 1989;10(6):1251-4. [Medline].

  118. Rowe ML. Low back pain in industry. A position paper. J Occup Med. Apr 1969;11(4):161-9. [Medline].

  119. Saal JA, Saal JS, Ashley J. Thermal characteristics of the lumbar disc: evaluation of a novel approach to targeted intra discal thermal therapy. Presented at the 13th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society. San Francisco, CA, October 28-31, 1998.

  120. Saal JA, Saal JS. Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain: prospective outcome study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine. May 1 2002;27(9):966-73; discussion 973-4.

  121. Saal JA, Saal JS. Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain: prospective outcome study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2002;27(9):966-73.

  122. Saal JS, Saal JA. A novel approach to painful internal disc derangement: collagen modulation with a thermal percutaneous navigable intradiscal catheter: a prospective trial. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society. 1998.

  123. Saifuddin A, Braithwaite I, White J, et al. The value of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in the demonstration of anular tears. Spine. Feb 15 1998;23(4):453-7. [Medline].

  124. Salkever DS. Morbidity costs: national estimates and economic determinants. NCHSR Research Summary Series. October 1985. Washington, DC:. US Department of Health and Human Services;1986.

  125. Schellhas KP. HIZ lesions. Spine. Jul 1 1997;22(13):1538. [Medline].

  126. Schellhas KP, Pollei SR, Gundry CR, Heithoff KB. Lumbar disc high-intensity zone. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Spine. Jan 1 1996;21(1):79-86. [Medline].

  127. Schiebler ML, Grenier N, Fallon M, et al. Normal and degenerated intervertebral disk: in vivo and in vitro MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1991;157(1):93-7. [Medline].

  128. Schnebel B, Kingston S, Watkins R, Dillin W. Comparison of MRI to contrast CT in the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. Spine. Mar 1989;14(3):332-7. [Medline].

  129. Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine. Apr 1987;12(3):276-81. [Medline].

  130. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, et al. The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. Sep 1 1995;20(17):1878-83. [Medline].

  131. Selby DK. The structural degenerative cascade: the lumbar spine. In: White AH, Schofferman JA, eds. Spine Care: Diagnosis Conservative Treatment. St Louis:. Mosby;1995: 8-26.

  132. Sether LA, Yu S, Haughton VM, Fischer ME. Intervertebral disk: normal age-related changes in MR signal intensity. Radiology. Nov 1990;177(2):385-8. [Medline].

  133. Shulenberger CC. Ergonomic intervention for the prevention and treatment of spinal disorders. In: White AH, Schofferman JH, eds. Spine Care: Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment. St Louis, MO:. Mosby;1995: 472-85.

  134. Slipman CW. Discography. In: Gonzalez E, ed. Acute Low Back Pain: Assessment and Management. New York, NY:. Demos Vermande;1998.

  135. Smith BM, Hurwitz EL, Solsberg D, et al. Interobserver reliability of detecting lumbar intervertebral disc high- intensity zone on magnetic resonance imaging and association of high- intensity zone with pain and anular disruption. Spine. Oct 1 1998;23(19):2074-80. [Medline].

  136. Sobel DF, Zyroff J, Thorne RP. Diskogenic vertebral sclerosis: MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Sep-Oct 1987;11(5):855-8. [Medline].

  137. Sponseller PD, Hobbs W, Riley LH III, Pyeritz RE. The thoracolumbar spine in Marfan syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1995;77(6):867-76. [Medline].

  138. Svensson HO, Vedin A, Wilhelmsson C. Low-back pain in relation to other diseases and cardiovascular risk factors. Spine. Apr 1983;8(3):277-85. [Medline].

  139. Swerdlow M, Sayle-Creer WS. A study of extradural medication in the relief of the lumbosciatic syndrome. Anaesthesia. Jul 1970;25(3):341-5. [Medline].

  140. Troup JD, Martin JW, Lloyd DC. Back pain in industry. A prospective survey. Spine. Jan-Feb 1981;6(1):61-9. [Medline].

  141. Urban JP, Holm S, Maroudas A, Nachemson A. Nutrition of the intervertebral disk: an in vivo study of solute transport. Clin Orthop. Nov-Dec 1977;(129):101-14. [Medline].

  142. Valkenburg HA, Haanen HM. The epidemiology of low back pain. In: White AA, Gordon SL, eds. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Symposium. St Louis:. Mosby;1982.

  143. Vamvanij V, Fredrickson BE, Thorpe JM, et al. Surgical treatment of internal disc disruption: an outcome study of four fusion techniques. J Spinal Disord. Oct 1998;11(5):375-82. [Medline].

  144. Vernon-Roberts B, Pirie CJ. Degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine and their sequelae. Rheumatol Rehabil. Feb 1977;16(1):13-21. [Medline].

  145. Viner N. Intractable sciatica-the sacral injections- an effective method of giving relief. Can Med Assoc J. 1925;15:630-4.

  146. Von Korff M, Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Barlow W. Back pain in primary care: outcomes at 1 year. Spine. Jun 1 1993;18(7):855-62. [Medline].

  147. Waddell G. 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine. Sep 1987;12(7):632-44. [Medline].

  148. Waddell G, Bircher M, Finlayson D, Main CJ. Symptoms and signs: physical disease or illness behaviour?. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). Sep 22 1984;289(6447):739-41. [Medline].

  149. Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. Mar-Apr 1980;5(2):117-25. [Medline].

  150. Walsh TR, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, et al. Lumbar discography in normal subjects. A controlled, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. Aug 1990;72(7):1081-8. [Medline].

  151. Weiner BK, Fraser RD. Foraminal injection for lateral lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Sep 1997;79(5):804-7. [Medline].

  152. Weinstein J, Claverie W, Gibson S. The pain of discography. Spine. Dec 1988;13(12):1344-8. [Medline].

  153. Weinstein J. Report of the 1985 ISSLS Traveling Fellowship. Mechanisms of spinal pain. The dorsal root ganglion and its role as a mediator of low-back pain. Spine. Dec 1986;11(10):999-1001. [Medline].

  154. Wetzel FT, LaRocca SH, Lowery GL, Aprill CN. The treatment of lumbar spinal pain syndromes diagnosed by discography: lumbar arthrodesis. Spine. Apr 1 1994;19(7):792-800. [Medline].

  155. White A, Mattmiller A, White L. Back School and Other Conservative Approaches to Low Back Pain. St Louis, MO:. Mosby;1983.

  156. White AA III, Gordon SL. Synopsis: workshop on idiopathic low-back pain. Spine. Mar-Apr 1982;7(2):141-9. [Medline].

  157. White AH. The socioeconomic cascade. In: White AH, Schoffermand JA, eds. Spine Care: Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment. St Louis, MO:. Mosby;1995; 27-34.

  158. White AW. Low back pain in men receiving workmen''s compensation. Can Med Assoc J. Jul 9 1966;95(2):50-6. [Medline].

  159. White L. Back School State of the Art Reviews. Philadelphia, PA:. Hanley and Belfus;1991.

  160. Wiesel SW, Tsourmas N, Feffer HL, et al. A study of computer-assisted tomography, I: the incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients. Spine. Sep 1984;9(6):549-51. [Medline].

  161. Williams AL, Haughton VM, Meyer GA, Ho KC. Computed tomographic appearance of the bulging annulus. Radiology. Feb 1982;142(2):403-8. [Medline].

  162. Wiltse LL. The history of spinal disorders. In: Frymoyer JW, ed. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA:. Lippincott-Raven;1997: 3-40.

  163. Winnie AP, Hartman JT, Meyers HL Jr, et al. Pain clinic, II: intradural and extradural corticosteroids for sciatica. Anesth Analg. Nov-Dec 1972;51(6):990-1003. [Medline].

  164. Woo SL, Buckwalter JA. AAOS/NIH/ORS workshop. Injury and repair of the musculoskeletal soft tissues. Savannah, GA, June 18-20, 1987. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(6):907-31. [Medline].

  165. Yu S, Haughton VM, Sether LA, et al. Criteria for classifying normal and degenerated lumbar intervertebral disks. Radiology. Feb 1989;170(2):523-6. [Medline].

  166. Yu SW, Haughton VM, Lynch KL, et al. Fibrous structure in the intervertebral disk: correlation of MR appearance with anatomic sections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Sep-Oct 1989;10(5):1105-10. [Medline].

  167. Yu SW, Haughton VM, Sether LA, Wagner M. Anulus fibrosus in bulging intervertebral disks. Radiology. Dec 1988;169(3):761-3. [Medline].

  168. Yu SW, Haughton VM, Sether LA, Wagner M. Comparison of MR and diskography in detecting radial tears of the anulus: a postmortem study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Sep-Oct 1989;10(5):1077-81. [Medline].

  169. Zdeblick TA. A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine. Jun 15 1993;18(8):983-91. [Medline].

  170. de Roos A, Kressel H, Spritzer C, Dalinka M. MR imaging of marrow changes adjacent to end plates in degenerative lumbar disk disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 1987;149(3):531-4. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

lumbar degenerative disk disease, LDDD, lumbar degenerative disc disease, low back pain, LBP, lumbar spondylosis, annular tear, internal disc disruption syndrome, internal disk disruption syndrome, herniated disc, herniated disk, arthritis, lumbar strain, nucleus pulposus, annular delamination, annular lamellae, discogenic pain, diskogenic pain, disc degeneration, disk degeneration, lumbar arthrodesis, lumbar discectomy, lumbar laminectomy, spondylolisthesis, epidural steroid injection, ESI

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Rajeev K Patel, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester - Strong Health Spine Center, University of Rochester - Strong Memorial Health System
Rajeev K Patel, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Association of Academic Physiatrists, and North American Spine Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Curtis W Slipman, MD, Director, University of Pennsylvania Spine Center, Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Curtis W Slipman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Association of Academic Physiatrists, International Association for the Study of Pain, and North American Spine Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

J Michael Wieting, DO, MEd, Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Director, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Training, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Medical Director, Rehabilitation Center, Ingham Regional Medical Center
J Michael Wieting, DO, MEd is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Osteopathy, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American College of Forensic Examiners, American College of Sports Medicine, American Heart Association, American Osteopathic Association, American Osteopathic College of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Association of Academic Physiatrists, and International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Patrick M Foye, MD, FAAPMR, FAAEM, Associate Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Co-Director of Musculoskeletal Fellowship, Co-Director of Back Pain Clinic, Director of Coccyx Pain (Tailbone Pain, Coccydynia) Service, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School
Patrick M Foye, MD, FAAPMR, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, Association of Academic Physiatrists, and International Spine Intervention Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Kelly L Allen, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lourdes Regional Rehabilitation Center, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Rene Cailliet, MD, Professor-Chairman Emeritus, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine; Former Director, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center
Rene Cailliet, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Pain Society, Association of American Medical Colleges, International Association for the Study of Pain, and Pan American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.