eMedicine Specialties > Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Spinal Cord Injury
Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Jan 13, 2009
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
Differential Diagnoses
Achilles Tendon Injuries and Tendonitis
Bursitis
Cellulitis
Heterotopic Ossification
Lymphedema
Superficial Thrombophlebitis
Other Problems to Be Considered
Fracture
Muscle or soft tissue injury
Dependent edema
Ruptured Baker cyst
Hematoma
Workup
Laboratory Studies
- D-dimer assays
- Formed when crossed-linked fibrin contained in a thrombus is proteolyzed by plasmin
- Useful adjunct to noninvasive testing for suggested deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- Highly sensitive
- High negative predictive value - Rules out DVT if negative, but is less helpful if positive, especially in trauma patients
Imaging Studies
- The accurate diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by clinical signs and symptoms alone is unreliable at best. Signs of unexplained fever, unilateral leg swelling (although swelling can be bilateral), or erythema should alert the clinician to the possibility of DVT. The sudden onset of chest pain, tachycardia, tachypnea, hypoxia, hypotension, or cardiac arrhythmia should suggest pulmonary embolism (PE). The following studies may be used in the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease:
- Radiocontrast venography
- The criterion standard for the diagnosis of DVT
- Invasive procedure that may have adverse effects, including pain
- Potential of contrast-mediated thrombosis and dye allergy
- Costly procedure
- Radiocontrast venography
- Doppler ultrasonography
- Noninvasive and sensitive (98-100%) method for the diagnosis of proximal DVT
- Allows direct imaging of major veins and assessment of velocity of flow in these veins
- Diagnostic accuracy compares favorably with that of venography
- Dependent on operator expertise
- Has become the preferred test in the diagnosis of DVT
- 125 I fibrinogen scan
- Greatest sensitivity for calf vein DVT
- Rarely used in the clinical setting
- Some disadvantages - These include cost, a 24-hour delay from injection to reading, failure to detect established thrombi, and the danger of viral transmission.
- Impedance plethysmography (IPG)4
- Noninvasive test
- Generates no images, relying instead on unfamiliar technology
- Less sensitive for detecting DVT of calf muscle
- Less sensitivity and specificity than Doppler ultrasonography
- Less sensitive to incomplete obstruction of vein by DVT
- Extrinsic compression may give positive result.
- Ventilation/perfusion lung scan
- This scan is indicated as part of the diagnostic evaluation of PE.
- A definitive diagnosis occurs if the results are normal or if there is a high probability, especially if clinical suspicion is confirmed by results.
- Low or intermediate probability scan results require further evaluation (with, for example, lower extremity Doppler ultrasonography or pulmonary angiography).
Related eMedicine topic:
Bedside Ultrasonography, Deep Vein Thrombosis
More on Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury |
| Overview: Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury |
| Treatment & Medication: Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury |
| Follow-up: Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Yu HT, Dylan ML, Lin J, et al. Hospitals' compliance with prophylaxis guidelines for venous thromboembolism. Am J Health Syst Pharm. Jan 1 2007;64(1):69-76. [Medline].
Powell M, Kirshblum S, O'Connor KC. Duplex ultrasound screening for deep vein thrombosis in spinal cord injured patients at rehabilitation admission. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Sep 1999;80(9):1044-6. [Medline].
Jones T, Ugalde V, Franks P, et al. Venous thromboembolism after spinal cord injury: incidence, time course, and associated risk factors in 16,240 adults and children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Dec 2005;86(12):2240-7. [Medline].
Akers SM, Bartter T, Pratter MR. Impedance plethysmography. It's the clinical outcome that counts. Chest. Nov 1994;106(5):1317-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. Jun 2008;133(6 Suppl):381S-453S. [Medline].
Green D. Prophylaxis of thromboembolism in spinal cord-injured patients. Chest. Dec 1992;102(6 Suppl):649S-651S. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Clagett GP, Anderson FA, Geerts W, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest. Nov 1998;114(5 Suppl):531S-560S. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Clagett GP, Anderson FA, Heit J, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest. Oct 1995;108(4 Suppl):312S-334S. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Geerts WH, Jay RM, Code KI, et al. A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. Sep 5 1996;335(10):701-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Green D, Lee MY, Lim AC, et al. Prevention of thromboembolism after spinal cord injury using low-molecular-weight heparin. Ann Intern Med. Oct 15 1990;113(8):571-4. [Medline].
Shackford SR, Cook A, Rogers FB, et al. The increasing use of vena cava filters in adult trauma victims: data from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma. Oct 2007;63(4):764-9. [Medline].
Burns SP, Nelson AL, Bosshart HT, et al. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for prevention of thromboembolism in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28(1):33-42. [Medline].
Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines. Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1999.
Hebbeler SL, Marciniak CM, Crandall S, et al. Daily vs twice daily enoxaparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disorders during rehabilitation following acute spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(3):236-40. [Medline].
Slavik RS, Chan E, Gorman SK, et al. Dalteparin versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acute spinal cord injury and major orthopedic trauma patients: 'DETECT' trial. J Trauma. May 2007;62(5):1075-81; discussion 1081. [Medline].
Worley S, Short C, Pike J, et al. Dalteparin vs low-dose unfractionated heparin for prophylaxis against clinically evident venous thromboembolism in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(4):379-87. [Medline].
Anand SS, Wells PS, Hunt D, et al. Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis?. JAMA. Apr 8 1998;279(14):1094-9. [Medline].
Green D, Rossi EC, Yao JS, et al. Deep vein thrombosis in spinal cord injury: effect of prophylaxis with calf compression, aspirin, and dipyridamole. Paraplegia. Aug 1982;20(4):227-34. [Medline].
Green D, Sullivan S, Simpson J, et al. Evolving risk for thromboembolism in spinal cord injury (SPIRATE Study). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. Jun 2005;84(6):420-2. [Medline].
Merli GJ, Crabbe S, Doyle L, et al. Mechanical plus pharmacological prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis in acute spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. Aug 1992;30(8):558-62. [Medline].
Merli GJ, Crabbe S, Paluzzi RG, et al. Etiology, incidence, and prevention of deep vein thrombosis in acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Nov 1993;74(11):1199-205. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
deep venous thrombosis, embolism, DVT, pulmonary embolism, spinal cord injury, clot, blood clot, blood clots, paralysis, spinal cord, spinal, platelet, platelets, thromboembolism, vein thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, venous thrombosis, anticoagulation, paraplegia, thromboembolic disease, vein thrombosis treatment, venous thrombosis treatment
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury