eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Brain/Spine

Brain, Arteriovenous Malformation

Author: Robert A Koenigsberg, DO, MSc, FAOCR, Professor, Director of Neuroradiology, Program Director, Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology Training Programs, Department of Radiology, Hahnemann University Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Jeffrey R Wasserman, DO, Diagnostic Radiologist, Manatee Memorial Hospital and Lakewood Ranch Medical Center; Bernadette R Diegnan, Drexel University College of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Dec 31, 2008

Introduction


A CT scan of the head that demonstrates a left oc...

A CT scan of the head that demonstrates a left occipital arteriovenous malformation (AVM), with multiple calcified phleboliths and numerous hyperattenuating vascular channels.

A CT scan of the head that demonstrates a left oc...

A CT scan of the head that demonstrates a left occipital arteriovenous malformation (AVM), with multiple calcified phleboliths and numerous hyperattenuating vascular channels.


A sagittal T1-weighted MRI demonstrating a large ...

A sagittal T1-weighted MRI demonstrating a large occipital arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with parasagittal flow voids.

A sagittal T1-weighted MRI demonstrating a large ...

A sagittal T1-weighted MRI demonstrating a large occipital arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with parasagittal flow voids.


A diffusion-weighted MRI showing a lack of signal...

A diffusion-weighted MRI showing a lack of signal intensity associated with an arteriovenous malformation (AVM).


A diffusion-weighted MRI showing a lack of signal...

A diffusion-weighted MRI showing a lack of signal intensity associated with an arteriovenous malformation (AVM).



A lateral left carotid angiogram demonstrating a ...

A lateral left carotid angiogram demonstrating a mixed pial-dural arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Arterial and occipital arterial feeders extend to the nidus via distal branches of the middle cerebral artery.

A lateral left carotid angiogram demonstrating a ...

A lateral left carotid angiogram demonstrating a mixed pial-dural arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Arterial and occipital arterial feeders extend to the nidus via distal branches of the middle cerebral artery.


Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) of the brain. A ...

Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) of the brain. A CT scan of the posterior fossa demonstrating a hemorrhage in the fourth ventricle, with extension to the left cerebellum.

Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) of the brain. A ...

Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) of the brain. A CT scan of the posterior fossa demonstrating a hemorrhage in the fourth ventricle, with extension to the left cerebellum.


Background

An arteriovenous malformation is a tangled cluster of vessels, typically located in the supratentorial part of the brain, in which arteries connect directly to veins without any intervening capillary bed. The lesion may be compact, containing a core of tightly packed venous loops, or it may be diffuse, with anomalous vessels dispersed among normal brain parenchyma. In 77% of cases the core, or nidus, of a compact arteriovenous malformation is 2-6 cm in diameter.1

Arteriovenous malformations account for approximately 11% of cerebrovascular malformations; venous angiomas, a more common type of cerebrovascular malformation, account for 64% of cases. Arteriovenous malformations are more likely than other types of vascular malformations to be clinically symptomatic. Arteriovenous malformations typically involve the brain, but occasionally, they are associated with the spinal cord and its dura.2,3,4,5

Categorization of arteriovenous malformations

Arteriovenous malformations are categorized by their blood supply. Pial or parenchymal arteriovenous malformations are supplied by the internal carotid or vertebral circulation, whereas dural arteriovenous malformations are supplied by the external carotid circulation. Mixed arteriovenous malformations are supplied by both. Pial arteriovenous malformations, which are almost exclusively congenital, are the most common kind. Dural arteriovenous malformations are relatively uncommon and are theorized to be secondary to trauma, surgery, thrombosis of an adjacent venous sinus, or venoocclusive disease. Mixed arteriovenous malformations usually occur when the lesion is large enough to recruit blood vessels from both the internal and external carotid arteries. A pediatric variant of arteriovenous malformation is the vein of Galen aneurysm, in which an arteriovenous malformation drains to and dilates the great vein of Galen.

Pial arteriovenous malformations tend to be asymptomatic until the second, third, or fourth decade of life. They most commonly manifest as spontaneous hemorrhage or seizure. Other clinical signs include headache and transient or progressive neurologic deficit. Dural arteriovenous malformations typically feature pulsatile tinnitus, cranial bruits, headaches, or hemifacial spasm. Infants with a vein of Galen malformation may present with hydrocephalus or severe congestive heart failure.

Saccular aneurysms occur in association with arteriovenous malformations in 6-20% of patients. The preferred site for an arteriovenous malformation–associated aneurysm is a feeding artery. Venous and intranidal aneurysms occur less frequently. When aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations occur together, they can cause intracranial or subarachnoid hemorrhage; however, intracranial hemorrhage is more likely to stem from an arteriovenous malformation.6,7,8

Spetzler and Martin grading system

The Spetzler and Martin grading system attempts to predict the risk of surgical morbidity and mortality by assigning points to an arteriovenous malformation on the basis of its size, the eloquence of the adjacent brain, and the pattern of venous drainage. The grading system includes 5 possible points. If the arteriovenous malformation is small (<3 cm), 1 point is assigned; if medium in size (3-6 cm), 2 points are assigned; or if large (>6 cm), 3 points.

An eloquent brain region is one in which injury to that region results in a disabling neurologic deficit; in the Spetzler-Martin grading system, 0 points are assigned for a noneloquent region, and 1 point is assigned for involvement of an eloquent brain region.

Lastly, an additional point can be assigned if the arteriovenous malformation drains into the deep venous system.

The grade of a lesion is determined by summing the points given in each of the 3 categories. Surgical treatment of a grade I arteriovenous malformation, therefore, presents little risk of morbidity and mortality. By contrast, a grade V lesion is associated with significant risk. A grade VI arteriovenous malformation is described as an inoperable arteriovenous malformation that is associated with a totally disabling deficit or death.9

Related eMedicine topics:

Arteriovenous Malformations (Neurosurgery)

Arteriovenous Malformations (Vascular Surgery)

Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformation

Presentation

Demographics

  • Most studies have shown a slightly increased preponderance of pial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in men.
  • Dural AVMs of the anterior cranial fossa occur more frequently in men than in women. Other types of dural AVMs occur more commonly in women.
  • No clear correlation exists between race and the prevalence of AVMs; however, the 1:7 ratio of intracranial vascular malformations to intracranial saccular aneurysms in the overall population has been shown to increase to 1:4 in people of Asian descent.
  • The incidence of AVMs is estimated to be 0.04-0.52%; the incidence in the United States is the same as that seen worldwide.

Natural history and presentation

AVMs can be found throughout the central nervous system (CNS). They may be microscopic or large enough to involve an entire hemisphere of the brain. Grossly, angiographically invisible AVMs are termed cryptic vascular malformations, a name suggesting that the lesions are completely thrombosed. Most AVMs are small (2-4 cm in 42% of cases) or moderately sized (4-6 cm in 35% of cases).

Ninety percent of AVMs are supratentorial, and they tend to occur at watershed areas (straddling more than 1 vascular territory); the remaining 10% are infratentorial. Seventy percent of supratentorial AVMs are purely pial, with no meningeal or dural vascular supply. The remainder of lesions are purely dural or a pial-dural mix. Approximately one half of posterior fossa AVMs are purely dural or a pial-dural mix.

Pial AVMs lie within the brain parenchyma, and they derive blood from the cerebral arteries, namely, the anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), or posterior cerebral artery (PCA). The rapid shunting of blood that is typical of pial AVMs is visualized as an abnormal tangle of blood vessels with early, and frequently rapid, venous drainage, which is uniquely demonstrated by catheter angiography. Most AVMs involving the ACA or its branches are purely pial.

Dural AVMs are almost always infratentorial. They most frequently drain into the transverse and sigmoid sinuses in the posterior fossa, but they may also involve the cavernous sinus, inferior petrosal sinus, superior sagittal sinus, or other areas of the brain or spinal venous system. The occipital artery and meningeal branches of the external carotid artery are the vessels that most commonly supply dural AVM components. Tentorial and small dural branches of the internal carotid artery and vertebral arteries may also contribute. Dural AVMs may be classified according to the sinus involved. Furthermore, dural AVMs may be associated with venous outlet stenosis or obstruction.2,3,4,5

The pathogenesis of areteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is not well understood. Because these malformations characteristically lack the capillary bed that normally intervenes between arteries and veins, investigation into the pathogenesis of AVMs has focused on, among other things, the molecular differences between arteries and veins, capillary bed morphogenesis, and inherited disorders of vasculogenesis.1

A major recent discovery demonstrates that the endothelial cell population is not homogeneous, as was previously believed. On the contrary, arterial and venous endothelial cells express different receptors from the onset of angiogenesis. Ephrin-B2 is found on arterial cells but not venous endothelial cells, whereas ephrin-B4 is found on venous cells but not arterial endothelial cells. Angiogenesis is impaired in ephrin-B2 knockout mice. That the endothelial cells lining arteries and veins are molecularly distinct suggests a mechanism for defective vasculogenesis and angiogenesis.10

In addition, the role of angiopoietins and their tyrosine kinase receptors is being explored. Angiopoietin 1 (ang-1) and its ligand, tie-2, may be crucial for vascular remodeling in the embryo. Ang-1 apparently controls the recruitment of pericytes and smooth muscle cell precursors to the blood vessel wall. Upregulation of tie-2 has been demonstrated in AVM vasculature. The improper recruitment of periendothelial cells can contribute to dysvasculogenesis of the capillary bed.

The gene coding for endoglin (CD105), which is a transforming growth factor b–binding endothelial cell receptor, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) type 1. HHT, also termed Osler-Rendu-Weber disease, is an autosomal dominant disorder that causes AVMs in the brain, skin, and viscera. Analogously, its variant, HHT type 2, is caused by mutations in the gene coding for activin receptorlike kinase (ALK-1).

Mutations in Flt-1, a tyrosine kinase receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), can result in thin-walled vessels of abnormally large diameter. Because the proper morphogenesis of the capillary bed probably depends on signaling between arteries and veins, any distortion of vessel anatomy or function may be expected to impair the process. Immunohistochemistry has demonstrated increased expression of VEGF in the vasculature of AVMs and the surrounding brain parenchyma.2,3,4,5,11

Symptoms

The symptoms of an AVM may include headache, weakness, numbness, visual problems, or, most often, the abrupt onset of stroke. Usually, AVMs are initially clinically silent, subsequently becoming symptomatic in the second, third, or fourth decade of life. Spontaneous rupture with hemorrhage is the presenting symptom in 30-55% of pial AVMs.

Pial AVMs are present from birth, but they are usually asymptomatic until the second, third, or fourth decade, when hemorrhage, seizure, or other symptoms occur. More than 95% of patients develop symptoms before age 70 years.

Dural AVMs, which most commonly involve the transverse, sigmoid, and cavernous sinuses, are believed to be acquired and develop during adulthood. Patients with dural AVMs of the anterior cranial fossa may be congenital, and they may present with hemorrhage from a ruptured venous aneurysm.

Morphologic features

Morphologically, AVMs may be either compact or diffuse. Compact AVMs are characterized by a nidus formed by tightly packed entangled venous loops that are interconnected by small venules. Small amounts of nonfunctional brain tissue are found between the loops. When located supratentorially, compact AVMs are often wedge-shaped, and they extend through both the gray matter and white matter. Typically, the base of the wedge is parallel to the meninges, with the vertex pointing toward the ventricles or deep brain.1

The venous loops of a compact AVM are attached to shunting arterioles, communicating venules, and draining veins. The microscopic shunting arterioles are the terminal branches of angiographically visible feeding arteries. A feeding artery is by definition an artery that transfers arterial blood to the AVM core. That the feeding arteries send branches both to the AVM and to normal brain tissue can significantly confound treatment.2,3,4,5

Feeding arteries and vessels

There are 3 types of feeding arteries. The circumferential feeding artery extends around the nidus and sends branches to both small arterioles connected to the nidus and normal brain capillaries. Penetrating feeding arteries bisect the AVM core and send branches to it. Final feeding arteries either connect directly to an AVM loop or branch to shunting arterioles.1

After arterial blood has circulated through the AVM nidus, it is drained by collecting veins, which then feed into larger veins; they may be either superficial or deep. The larger veins ultimately join to connect to a major draining vein. Major draining veins course through the sulcus and are connected to the neighboring cortical veins by numerous venules. The distal end of a major draining vein is connected to large hemispheric veins, which drain into the venous sinuses.1

AVMs are currently believed to be hemodynamically compartmentalized; each compartment has its own feeding arteries and draining veins. For example, a large AVM in the sensorimotor area may have a lateral compartment supplied by MCA branches, a medial compartment supplied by ACA branches, and a posterior compartment supplied by PCA branches. The number of compartments in an AVM is proportional to its size. An AVM smaller than 3 cm in diameter is likely to have 1 compartment, whereas an AVM 3-4 cm in diameter may have 2 compartments, and an AVM larger than 4 cm in diameter typically has at least 3 compartments.

In contrast to the vessels of compact AVMs, those of diffuse AVMs are dispersed among normal brain tissue. Diffuse AVMs are typically found in the basal ganglia or thalamus. Blood flow through an AVM is proportional to the number of compartments and to AVM volume. For example, the rate of flow may be 285 mL/min for a 2-cm lesion and 800-1000 mL/min for a 4- to 5-cm lesion.

The vessels themselves are enlarged and dilated as a result of passive congestion secondary to increased pressure in the arterial core. Bright-red blood under relatively high pressure is often seen in the veins of an AVM, owing to arteriovenous (AV) shunting. Occasionally, aneurysms develop in AVM vessels, which is consistent with the altered hemodynamic stress characteristic of the lesions. Aneurysms may, therefore, develop along feeding arterial pedicles or along venous drainage pathways. Typically, the latter occurs proximal to a venous stenosis.2,3,4,5

Histologic features

Histologically, distinguishing between the arteries and the arterialized veins of an AVM can be difficult because the wall thickness of each can vary unpredictably. Both feeding arteries and draining veins may be attenuated in some places and thickened by intimal hypertrophy in others. Greatly attenuated arterial or venous walls may be the source of hemorrhage. Within the vessel, atherosclerosis and thrombosis are common, presumably because of the unusually high volume of blood flow and the tortuosity and angulation of the vessels.

Regional blood flow in the area immediately surrounding an AVM may be reduced to approximately 81% of normal. This is referred to as the steal phenomenon. Accordingly, the neighboring gyri and underlying parenchyma are often discolored, infarcted, and atrophic, which results from chronic ischemia. Other typical features include gliosis, russet-colored pigmentation resulting from the presence of hemosiderin-laden macrophages after prior hemorrhage, and scattered foci of calcification. Overlying meninges may be thickened and fibrotic. Because AVMs are congenital lesions that replace normal brain tissue rather than displace it, they are not typically associated with mass effect unless hemorrhage has occurred; however, some AVMs do demonstrate mass effect, edema, and ischemic changes.

Despite the hypoperfusion seen in the normal brain parenchyma surrounding the AVM, total cerebral blood flow may be increased by as much as 50-100%. AVMs tend to exhibit slow progressive growth over many years because the shunted blood continually seeks adjacent vessels. Normal vasculature may be involved in the process.2,3,4,5,6

Risk

The cumulative lifetime risk that an intracranial AVM will eventually bleed is estimated to be 50%. Hemorrhage is more likely to be intracerebral (parenchymal) or intraventricular rather than purely subarachnoid. Overall, a history of hemorrhage is the best clinical predictor of future bleeding. Pial AVMs are more likely to bleed than dural AVMs are.2,3,4,5,6

  • The risk of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage is 2-4% per year. Each episode has a 10-15% rate of mortality and a 20-30% rate of permanent neurologic deficit.
  • In the year after the first hemorrhage, the risk of rebleeding is 6%; thereafter, it decreases to 2-4%. Overall, hemorrhage is implicated in 29% of patient deaths.
  • The risks associated with a residual AVM of any size are widely believed to be equivalent to the risks associated with untreated lesions; however, this statement is controversial.

Treatment

Relevant factors in the decision to treat an arteriovenous malformation include patient and family preferences, Spetzler-Martin grade, lesion site and angioarchitecture, clinical presentation, neurologic status, patient age, past medical history, and pregnancy. The treatment of intracranial AVMs typically involves 1 or more techniques, including embolization, direct surgical or microsurgical resection, or radiosurgery. Usually, small or medium-sized AVMs located in noncritical areas of the brain can be successfully removed with conventional microsurgery. In contrast, large AVMs or AVMs in eloquent cerebral locations usually require staged, multimodal treatment.

Embolization

Occasionally, embolization is the only procedure performed, particularly when surgery is inadvisable or refused by the patient. The long-term goal of embolization is to reduce the risk of cerebral hemorrhage, which ultimately reduces the risk of overall morbidity and mortality from AVM rupture. AVM-related headaches may often improve after embolization alone, particularly when AV shunting ceases. When combined with surgery, embolization is performed to reduce the volume of the AVM nidus before surgical resection.

Smaller lesions have lower complication rates at surgery; therefore, they may not need preoperative embolization. Rarely, embolization may follow microsurgery, radiosurgery, or both (eg, when partial microsurgical resection yields a residual AVM that is too large for treatment with radiosurgery alone). A delay between embolization and surgical resection of 2-4 days up to weeks may be beneficial, thereby permitting vascular adaptation without allowing time for a major collateral supply to the AVM to mature.

Primarily, the agents used for AVM embolization include liquid adhesives, particles, and alcohol. Because particles alone are not usually considered a permanent embolic agent, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is typically used only in the preoperative setting. PVA particles have been extensively used in this capacity for more than 20 years. Advantages include their relative ease of use and favorable short-term histotoxicity. Among the shortcomings are an inability to fully permeate the AVM nidus and the need to use microcatheters that can be directed by guidewires, which have additional attendant risks. During embolization of a large AVM, a staged increase in particle size may be necessary. When flow in the AVM nidus has slowed significantly, final blockage can be achieved by using small microcoils.

Unlike particulate embolization, glue embolization with cyanoacrylates may allow a permanent and complete cure of AVM, although long-term follow-up studies have yet to demonstrate this definitively (see Images below and Images 21-22 in Multimedia). Cyanoacrylates are a family of rapidly polymerizing adhesives, of which isobutyl-2-cyanoacrylate (IBCA) and n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) are 2 members. Currently, many practitioners regard NBCA as the ideal embolic agent. Absolute alcohol can both obliterate aberrant vessels and penetrate capillary walls, causing destruction of normal cells. Accordingly, the use of glue or alcohol requires extreme care in the placement of the microcatheter tip.

A lateral left carotid angiogram in a patient wit...

A lateral left carotid angiogram in a patient with seizures and an unruptured left parasagittal arteriovenous malformation (AVM).

A lateral left carotid angiogram in a patient wit...

A lateral left carotid angiogram in a patient with seizures and an unruptured left parasagittal arteriovenous malformation (AVM).


A lateral left carotid angiogram obtained after a...

A lateral left carotid angiogram obtained after a successful staged embolization with a liquid adhesive that shows lack of arterial venous shunting.

A lateral left carotid angiogram obtained after a...

A lateral left carotid angiogram obtained after a successful staged embolization with a liquid adhesive that shows lack of arterial venous shunting.


Ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer embolization is an alternative liquid agent to the standard liquid agent n-butyl cyanoacyrlate. Ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) is both nonadhesive and nonabsorbent, which makes it possible for the embolization injection to be controlled and intermittently paused to evaluate the embolization progress. In comparison with nBCA, ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer potentially allows for large volumes to be injected from one catheter position in a controlled manner, embolizing a relatively large part of the AVM without filling the draining veins or leptomeningeal collaterals.

For ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer embolization, the microcatheter is initially positioned to the AVM nidus. During injection, the ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer penetrates the nidus compartment, which also allowing the embolic agent to form an attenuated cast or plug around the tip of the microcatheter over a short distance. Precipitation takes 2 minutes and, during this time, the injection procedure is interrupted. Small volumes of ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer are injected per cycle until there is enough reflux and attenuated cast for a second penetration of the nidus. The second penetration normally has a long precipitation time (up to 20 minutes) and requires several cycles of injecting and waiting. The procedure is stopped when the injection resistance increases significantly (average of 3.3ml of ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer injected per AVM) to prevent rupture of the microcatheter or vessels. Injections arestartedwithahigher-viscositytypeofethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer and are continuedwith a lower-viscosity type.

There are relatively high occlusion rates (volume reduction >90%) associated with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer injection when the AVM is in a superatentorial and cortical location, the nidus is compact and plexiform, and where there are a small number of feeders. There are occlusion rates of <70% for ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer in AVMs with multiple compartmental draining veins, multiple supplying arteries, and when the nidus was diffuse. The rate of complete obliteration of AVMs at the end of ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer embolization procedures is 20% and 53% after embolization and surgery; however, the final control angiography is not yet available in 21% of patients. An overall cure rate of 71% has been observed for all AVMs, as well as a cure rate of 83% for patients who underwent embolization or embolization and surgery.

Complications of ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer embolization include stuck catheters and vessel perforations, which reportedly decrease with operator experience. Improvements made to the catheter coating by the manufacturer have also reportedly decreased the rate of stuck catheters and vessel perforations.

The risk of major complications resulting from embolization is approximately 5-15%. Hemorrhage is a major risk because of inadvertent AVM rupture during the embolization procedure. Another problem is retrograde thrombosis leading to stroke. This can arise after successful occlusion of a major feeding artery if that artery is itself fed by a large trunk that supplies only a few other small normal branches. Then. thrombosis may occur in the large trunk, with subsequent risk of infarct in the normal parenchyma supplied by the small branches. Thrombosis may also result from endothelial damage caused by the insertion of the catheter.

Inadvertent occlusion of nontarget vessels is a potential complication of any embolization procedure. Normal chronically hypoperfused vessels in the parenchyma surrounding the AVM may not be present during preembolization testing, but they remain at risk for inadvertent occlusion.

Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough (NPPB) is postulated to be another possible complication of AVM embolization resulting in cerebral hemorrhage, although the validity of the assertion is under debate. According to the theory, the small hemispheric vessels adjacent to an AVM must remain maximally dilated in order to divert blood from the lesion to normal brain parenchyma. Over time, the chronic dilatation leads to a loss of autoregulation, possibly at the arteriolar level.12

When aberrant vessels of the AVM are successfully occluded during embolization, surrounding capillary beds may not be able to withstand the sudden exposure to normal perfusion pressure. Edema and or frank hemorrhage may result. Findings from some series suggest that NPPB may account for serious clinical complications in 1-3% of patients. Positive risk factors for NPPB are believed to include size, high flow, scanty filling of adjacent normal vasculature, steal from the vertebrobasilar or contralateral carotid circulations, excessive contribution to the nidus from the external carotid artery, and clinical findings of progressive or fluctuating neurologic deficit.12

A large vein that drains both an AVM and normal structures may undergo thrombosis following occlusion by embolization of an AVM blood supply because arterial occlusion results in decreased venous blood flow. Venous infarct may occur in the normal territory.13

Radiosurgery

Focused radiosurgery may be performed alone or in conjunction with other treatment modalities. The details are beyond the scope of this review; however, the advantages of radiosurgery include a high obliteration rate (particularly with small or medium-sized lesions), a low morbidity rate, and the lack of a need for general anesthesia. The radiosurgical obliteration rate is significantly lower with larger AVMs. Other disadvantages to radiosurgery include the 1- to 4-year latency period required for complete obliteration to occur, as well as the risk of radiation-related white-matter changes or vasculopathy.13

Microsurgical resection

Microsurgical resection is the treatment of choice for small AVMs in noncritical areas of the brain. For AVMs in critical regions, microsurgery may provide immediate and permanent cure of the lesion and relief of symptoms. Microsurgery also poses risks related to the use of general anesthesia as well as the risk of creating 1 or more new neurologic deficits. Potentially curative embolization has, therefore, gained in popularity in the definitive treatment of AVMs, both small and large.

Patient age is another important consideration in the decision to perform surgery. Because the incidence of hemorrhage is highest in younger age groups, conservative treatment is often recommended for elderly patients. Other risk factors include the size and location of the AVM. The Spetzler-Martin system is, therefore, commonly used to predict the overall surgical outcome.13

Preferred Examination

Imaging of arteriovenous malformations

The first imaging study that is performed in patients with a suspected AVM is usually a CT or MRI scan. These studies are good for depicting AVMs and they are relatively noninvasive, only requiring an injection of contrast material into a small vein.

Overall, arteriovenous malformations are best imaged by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which can uniquely show these lesions as a tangle of vascular channels that appear as flow voids. Nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) is superior for visualizing the small foci of calcification often associated with arteriovenous malformations, and it may also delineate hyperattenuating serpiginous vessels the constitute the nidus.

Nonenhanced CT scanning is valuable for demonstrating the extent of acute hemorrhage and hydrocephalus. Contrast-enhanced CT shows enhancement of the typical vascular channels. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or CT angiography (CTA) may be adequate for initial or follow-up evaluation of an arteriovenous malformation. Demonstration of the aneurysms sometimes found on arteriovenous malformation feeding arteries may be accomplished by means of MRA, CTA, or catheter angiography.14,15,16

Computed tomography

CT scanning of the brain is the imaging test for evaluating acute headache or other acute mental status changes suggestive of acute cerebral hemorrhage. Detection of a lobar hemorrhage can suggest an underlying mass or AVM. Cerebral CT scanning can be used to identify areas of acute hemorrhage, and the results can suggest a vascular malformation, particularly with the judicious use of contrast material. Furthermore, CT scanning can uniquely demonstrate vascular calcifications associated with AVMs.15

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRI can help identify and characterize AVMs of the CNS, including the brain and spinal cord, without the use of radiation or invasive techniques. MRI is the examination of choice in patients with chronic headaches, seizure disorders of unknown etiology, and pulsatile tinnitus (among other conditions).

MRI typically follows CT scanning in the acute setting of neurologic illness when an underlying vascular lesion, such as an AVM, is suggested. MRI scans can demonstrate areas of parenchymal AVM involvement, showing both dilated feeding arteries and enlarged draining veins.

MRA and venography can further supplement conventional MRI in demonstrating in a near angiographic fashion the anatomy and microarchitecture of an AVM. MRI is the study of choice in the detection of vascular malformations of the spinal cord and spinal dura.14,15,16

Angiography

Catheter angiography remains the criterion standard for characterization and delineation of brain and spinal AVMs. Angiography is a dynamic real-time study that not only demonstrates the presence or absence of an AVM, but also shows vascular transit time. Diagnostic angiography is uniquely able to delineate the size and number of feeding arteries, and it can define the pial, dural, or mixed origin of the AVM.

Angiography can be used to measure the size of the AVM and judge the compactness of the nidus. Furthermore, angiography can be used to evaluate the venous drainage pattern (superficial, deep, or mixed). In addition, angiography frequently depicts associated risk factors for hemorrhage, including aneurysms and venous stenosis. Planning an angiography is a vital step in both interventional neuroradiologic and neurosurgical evaluation of patients with AVM.15

Angiography can reveal certain features that are believed to correlate with an increased risk of hemorrhage. These features include the presence of associated intranidal, remote, or pedicular aneurysms; central or deep venous drainage; stenosis of a draining vein; and a periventricular or intraventricular location. Natural-history studies have shown that a small nidus is another positive risk factor for hemorrhage; however, whether this risk is overestimated is unclear because small unruptured AVMs are asymptomatic and often go undiagnosed.

Factors that are known to reduce the risk of hemorrhage include peripheral or mixed venous drainage and angiomatous changes. Angiomatous change is the development of an anomalous transcortical supply to the AVM in response to chronic ischemia of the brain parenchyma adjacent to the lesion.

High flow within the AV shunt is believed to induce significant hypotension in the lesion's feeding arteries. This has been postulated to cause ischemic symptoms in some patients (such as seizure or prolonged or transient focal neurologic deficit). Further study is needed to clarify the matter. Seizures may also result from gliosis of the margins surrounding the lesion, ischemia, or mass effect. Occasionally, seizures do not correspond to the site of the malformation.

An unruptured AVM may cause headaches, mimicking migraine or cluster headaches. Headaches are usually ipsilateral to the lesion, and they are believed to stem from hydrocephalus, stretching of the dura, or increased pressure in the dural sinuses. In 16% of patients, headache may be the only presenting symptom.2,3,4,5,7,15

Limitations of Techniques

Computed tomography

CT scanning is an excellent examination for detecting cerebral hemorrhage, but it can miss an underlying AVM. AVMs are typically isoattenuating relative to normal parenchyma and, therefore, can be overlooked, particularly if a contrast agent is not administered. In an emergency setting, the administration of an iodinated contrast agent is typically deferred in favor of patient stabilization. Contrast-enhanced CT scanning also poses an inherent risk of radiation and, because of its cost, MRI may be a better screening examination for AVM in the general population. Contrast-enhanced CT scanning is performed to detect cerebral AVM, however, when MRI is contraindicated or otherwise not feasible.15

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRI is excellent for demonstrating the AVM nidus and abnormal flow voids typical of an AVM; however, in acute cerebral hemorrhage, compressed AVMs may no longer demonstrate flow and may, therefore, be overlooked. This may lead to the need for serial MRI studies to search for an underlying cause of cerebral hemorrhage not shown on a single MRI study. MRI can cause underestimation of the number of feeding arteries and associated aneurysms, which might also be missed. Furthermore, MRI can have a relatively poor sensitivity in detecting dural malformations. Gadolinium-based contrast material may be needed to demonstrate abnormal vascular channels.15

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist], gadobenate dimeglumine [MultiHance], gadodiamide [Omniscan], gadoversetamide [OptiMARK], gadoteridol [ProHance]) have been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). For more information, see the eMedicine topic Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy. The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or MRA scans. 

NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble moving or straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness. For more information, see the FDA Public Health Advisory or Medscape.

Angiography

Diagnostic angiography is the criterion standard for the evaluation of AVMs; however, it is invasive and carries risks related to catheter placement, contrast agents, and their injection. Specific neurangiographic risks include stroke, arterial dissection, reactions to the contrast material, and renal insufficiency and/or failure (among others). Nevertheless, modern cerebral angiography remains a safe and reliable method for AVM analysis, with an overall complication rate of less than 1%. Spinal angiography can be tedious and is associated with the risk of spinal cord infarction.15

Differential Diagnoses

Brain, Aneurysm
Brain, Capillary Telangiectasia
Brain, Cavernous Angiomas
Brain, Hypertensive Hemorrhage
Brain, MRI Appearance of Hemorrhage
Brain, Stroke

Other Problems to Be Considered

  • AVMs can be clinically differentiated from saccular aneurysms. A patient with an AVM is likely to present with a history of seizures and/or unilateral headache, as well as a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (particularly if it is mild). Because vascular malformations are under low pressure, blood tends to well up rather than spurt out of the lesion during a rupture. Bleeding is often parenchymal or mixed over a hemisphere, away from the circle of Willis. In contrast, rupture of a saccular aneurysm usually involves massive arterial bleeding from the base of the brain, accompanied by arterial spasm. Consequently, patients bleeding from an aneurysm may be more seriously ill than those bleeding from an AVM.
  • A headache indistinguishable from migraine may occur ipsilateral to an unruptured AVM. The coexistence of migraine and seizures is particularly suggestive of a vascular malformation. Dural AVMs of the sigmoid or cavernous sinus also may produce migrainelike episodic headaches or pulsatile tinnitus.7
  • Large AVMs are easily diagnosed with conventional angiography; however, smaller lesions may mimic malignant vascular brain tumors with AV shunting. AVMs may be distinguished by the more uniform caliber of their vessels, the characteristic dilatation of proximal arterial trunks, and the potentially huge, tortuous, and redundant draining veins. Although early venous filling and drainage typically results from vascular AVM, neoplasms (eg, glioblastoma multiforme, cerebral infarction, and an inflammatory mass) may also cause it.
  • On CT scans, an AVM that appears as a noncalcified mass or a calcified and hyperattenuating focal mass must be distinguished from other calcified masses, such as tuberous sclerosis, colloid cysts, neoplasms, and aneurysms.
  • Possible causes (in addition to vascular malformation) for parenchymal hematomas seen on CT scans include trauma; coagulopathy; hypertension; other vascular pathologies, such as aneurysm, amyloid angiopathy, or vasculitis; vascular occlusion, as from a venous infarct or embolic stroke with reperfusion hemorrhage; infection; and neoplasm.
  • If abnormal intracranial calcifications are seen, the differential diagnosis includes congenital or developmental diseases; infection; endocrine or metabolic causes, such as hypercalcemia, hypoparathyroidism, lead encephalopathy, and carbon monoxide intoxication; other vascular causes, including aneurysm and atherosclerosis; hematoma resulting from trauma; neoplasm; and iatrogenic causes, such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy.
  • Dark areas on T2-weighted MRIs can be caused by rapid blood flow, as from an AVM, aneurysm, or neoplasm; dense calcification, as from an AVM, infection, or neoplasm; or a variety of other causes not associated with vascular malformations. These include the presence of air, minerals or metals, hemorrhage, and mucinous or dense proteinaceous material.
  • Ring-enhancing lesions may result from a thrombosed vascular malformation or aneurysm, high-grade astrocytoma, primary lymphoma, metastasis, subacute infarct, resolving hematoma, abscess or fungal granuloma, demyelination, and radiation necrosis.2,3,4,5,15

More on Brain, Arteriovenous Malformation

Overview: Brain, Arteriovenous Malformation
Imaging: Brain, Arteriovenous Malformation
Multimedia: Brain, Arteriovenous Malformation
References

References

  1. De Biase L, Di Lisi F, Perna S, Spalloni A, Ferranti F, Lucani A, et al. Recurrent episodes of syncope in a patient with cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Clin Ter. Mar-Apr 2007;158(2):147-50. [Medline].

  2. Barrow DL. Intracranial Vascular Malformations. Park Ridge, Ill: American Association of Neurological Surgeons; 1990.

  3. Jafar JJ, Awad IA, Rosenwasser RH, eds. Vascular Malformations of the Central Nervous System. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

  4. Toole J, Murros K, Dindagur N. Cerebrovascular Disorders. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1999.

  5. Yamada S, ed. Arteriovenous Malformations in Functional Areas of the Brain. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Company; 1999.

  6. Kase CS, Caplan LR. Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Boston, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1994.

  7. Olesen J, Welch KM, Tfelt-Hansen, eds. The Headaches. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2000.

  8. Tsutsumi M, Aikawa H, Kodama T, Iko M, Nii K, Matsubara S, et al. Symptomatic inferior cavernous sinus artery aneurysm associated with cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). Jun 2008;48(6):257-8. [Medline].

  9. Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. Oct 1986;65(4):476-83. [Medline].

  10. Wang HU, Chen ZF, Anderson DJ. Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4. Cell. May 29 1998;93(5):741-53. [Medline].

  11. Graham DI, Lanton PL. Greenfield's Neuropathology. New York, NY: Arnold Publishers; 1997.

  12. Spetzler RF, Wilson CB, Weinstein P, Mehdorn M, Townsend J, Telles D. Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough theory. Clin Neurosurg. 1978;25:651-72. [Medline].

  13. Grossman RG, Loftus CM, eds. Principles of Neurosurgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1999.

  14. Anderson CM, Edelman RR, Turski PA. Clinical Magnetic Resonance Angiography. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993.

  15. Orrison W Jr. Neuroimaging. Vol. 1. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2000.

  16. Potchen EJ, Haacke EM, Siebert JE, Gotschalk A. Magnetic Resonance Angiography Concepts and Applications. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1993.

  17. Baum S. 1997. In: Abram's Angiography: Vascular and Interventional Radiology. Vol 1. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven.

  18. Baum S, Pentecost M, eds. Abram's Angiography: Interventional Radiology. Vol. 3. 4th ed. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown & Company; 1997.

  19. Connors JJ, Wojak JC. Interventional Neuroradiology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1999.

  20. Osborn AG, Tong KA. Handbook of Neuroradiology: Brain and Skull. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1996.

  21. Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J, Meyer B, Urbach H, Hoogeveen R, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology. Jan 2008;246(1):205-13. [Medline].

  22. Codd PJ, Mitha AP, Ogilvy CS. A recurrent cerebral arteriovenous malformation in an adult. J Neurosurg. Sep 2008;109(3):486-91. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

AVM, arteriovenous malformation, AV malformation, arteriovenous malformations, vascular malformation, AVM brain, arterial venous malformation, arteriovenous aneurysm, arteriovenous angioma, cerebrovascular malformations, pial AVMs, parenchymal AVMs, dural AVMs, vein-of-Galen aneurysm

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Robert A Koenigsberg, DO, MSc, FAOCR, Professor, Director of Neuroradiology, Program Director, Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology Training Programs, Department of Radiology, Hahnemann University Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine
Robert A Koenigsberg, DO, MSc, FAOCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Osteopathic Association, American Society of Neuroradiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Jeffrey R Wasserman, DO, Diagnostic Radiologist, Manatee Memorial Hospital and Lakewood Ranch Medical Center
Jeffrey R Wasserman, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Bernadette R Diegnan, Drexel University College of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Lucien M Levy, MD, PhD, Director of Neuroradiology, Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, George Washington University Medical Center
Lucien M Levy, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Cancer Society, American College of Radiology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Neuroradiology, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James G Smirniotopoulos, MD, Professor of Radiology, Neurology, and Biomedical Informatics, Chairman, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
James G Smirniotopoulos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.