eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Brain/Spine

Brain, Contusion: Imaging

Author: Denise Morales, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Institute of MI
Coauthor(s): Orlando Diaz-Daza, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Ben Taub General Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine; Roman Hlatky, MD, Assistant Professor, Center for Neurosurgical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center; L Anne Hayman, MD, Director of Herbert J Frensley Center for Imaging Research, Professor, Departments of Radiology, Psychiatry, and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Apr 3, 2007

Radiography

Findings

Skull radiographs are notoriously unhelpful in predicting underlying brain injury. However, scalp hematomas or skull fractures are usually good indicators of a significant direct force to a focal region. As such, the radiographic findings are usually associated with underlying brain contusions, although significant brain injury may occur without these findings.

Degree of Confidence

Skull radiographs are unreliable.

False Positives/Negatives

The rate of false-negative findings is high, but few false-positive findings occur.

Computed Tomography

Findings

Contusions may progress with time. Imaging findings in brain contusions tend to vary because of the stages of evolution common to these lesions.

Acute CT initially demonstrates isoattenuating contusions that become more evident on follow-up CT (see Image 4). CT scans often demonstrate progression over time in the size and number of contusions and the amount of hemorrhage in the contusions (see Images 4-6). Initially, CT findings can be normal or minimally abnormal because the partial volumes between the dense microhemorrhages and the hypodense edema can render contusions isoattenuating relative to the surrounding brain tissue (see Images 2-4).

Gliding contusions are due to sagittal angular acceleration with stretching and tearing of the parasagittal veins (see Image 6). Gliding contusions are often hemorrhagic, not only from the differential motion of subcortical structures (commonly referred to as shear injury), but also from tearing of parasagittal veins. When the brain abruptly shifts at the time of impact, the subcortical tissues glide more than the cortex. The convexities of each hemisphere are anchored to the dura by arachnoid granulations. Gliding contusions also tend to be bilateral.

Image 7 shows a CT scan compared with a xenon blood-flow image. On CT scan, the contusions are seen in the bifrontal regions as hyperintense areas. The corresponding xenon blood-flow image shows dark regions that indicate decreased perfusion in the contused areas of the brain.

Image 8 shows CT and MRI of acute contusions.

Degree of Confidence

CT is an excellent modality for defining contusions. Contusions often are not appreciated on the first CT scan obtained immediately after trauma, but they become obvious on follow-up scans.

False Positives/Negatives

Initially, the false-negative rate is high, but false-positive findings are negligible.

Contusions often are not appreciated on the first CT scan obtained immediately after trauma, but they become obvious on follow-up scans.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

MRIs typically demonstrate brain contusions from the onset of injury. MRI is sensitive to hyperacute hemorrhagic contusions ( <12 h).

On MRI, contusions are isointense to hyperintense on T1-weighted (see Images 8-11) and hyperintense on T2-weighted images (see Images 9-11). Gradient-echo MRIs (see Image 11) may reveal hypointensity, which is critical to the detection and delineation of contusions. Image 12 shows a T2-weighted MRI on which the subdural hematoma is inconspicuous. Image 12 also demonstrates how the gradient-echo MRI reveals the hypointensity of the subdural hematoma.

Use of fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences has made detection of accompanying subarachnoid hemorrhage possible, with a sensitivity that is equal to or greater than that of CT. The use of FLAIR in identifying brain contusions is shown in Images 8-10). Using FLAIR sequences, subarachnoid hemorrhage produces dramatic hyperintensity in the normally hypointense cerebrospinal fluid. Additionally, companion FLAIR images show the extent of contusions better than most traditional MRIs.

Image 8 shows the ability of traditional MRIs to depict the site of the cortical contusion. The companion FLAIR image shows the full extent of the hyperintense cortical contusion more clearly. This advantage is also demonstrated in Image 9, which shows traditional MRIs and a comparison FLAIR image that shows the subdural hemorrhage and its' extension into the brain more clearly.

Use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in acute brain trauma has not been described in depth in the literature. DWI allows the rapid detection of an ischemic region after the onset of brain injury. The signal intensity is increased in the affected region on DWIs. The use of DWI to identify cerebral contusions is demonstrated in Images 9-11). DWIs show areas of restricted diffusion in areas associated with cerebral contusions.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist], gadobenate dimeglumine [MultiHance], gadodiamide [Omniscan], gadoversetamide [OptiMARK], gadoteridol [ProHance]) have recently been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). For more information, see the eMedicine topic Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy. The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or MRA scans. As of late December 2006, the FDA had received reports of 90 such cases. Worldwide, over 200 cases have been reported, according to the FDA. NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble

movingor straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness. For more information, see the FDA Public Health Advisory or Medscape.

Degree of Confidence

The degree of confidence is excellent with FLAIR imaging.

False Positives/Negatives

MRI is sensitive but nonspecific for brain injuries. MRI is the criterion standard for defining contusions. Ischemic lesions often depicted in the normal aging brain may be difficult to distinguish from traumatic injuries in the acute phase.

Ultrasonography

Findings

Ultrasound has no role in acute brain injury.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Umile et al note that single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) blood-flow imaging with technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) uptake is sensitive enough to detect diffuse changes in patients with decreased blood flow due to depression. Many studies of mild, moderate, and severe TBI in the acute, subacute, and chronic stages have shown that SPECT is more sensitive than CT and MRI, and scans can depict changes even when findings are normal.10 SPECT findings are particularly sensitive in patients with mild postconcussive symptoms. SPECT scans can depict focal changes in 53% of patients with mild head injury who showed few abnormal findings on MRI and CT scans.11

SPECT results are correlated with the severity of injury. A negative finding on SPECT in the first 4 weeks is predictive of a good outcome. SPECT findings also can help in predicting a poor outcome, posttraumatic headaches, and clinical deterioration in patients with intracerebral hematomas. Studies correlating SPECT with neuropsychologic testing have been inconsistent. One study reported that SPECT can reveal significant increases in blood flow following cognitive rehabilitation therapy 2 years after TBI; these findings were correlated with improvements on neuropsychological tests.12

Xenon is an inert noble gas that is diffusible across the blood brain barrier. The inhalation of nonradioactive xenon can be used to calculate physiologic aspects of brain function, including regional cerebral blood flow, by using CT. Xenon imaging has been used for the documentation of brain death. Brain trauma is a potential application for xenon CT scanning.

At the current time, xenon blood-flow imaging has not achieved widespread use because of a number of factors. Xenon gas is expensive; without a rebreathing apparatus, approximately 10 L of xenon is required for each study, adding additional costs to each examination. Also, anesthetic equipment must be used, and special software must be purchased for the CT scanner. The anesthetic effects of xenon are somewhat worrisome as well. Multiple, rapid-sequence images must be obtained at the same level, limiting the total number of section levels that can be obtained. This factor may limit the scan to a few regions, when a given patient may have multiple pathologic areas.

Degree of Confidence

SPECT blood flow imaging has excellent sensitivity.

False Positives/Negatives

Caution must be taken not to mistakenly attribute the diffuse changes seen in psychiatric disorders with focal TBI changes.

Angiography

Findings

Focal vascular spasm may be seen in the acute/subacute injury phase.

Traumatic aneurysms are rare, but may occur as a result of either blunt or penetrating brain trauma. Intracranial aneurysms may result from fracture, with laceration of the adjacent artery by bone spicules, or by shearing forces secondary to rapid deceleration injury. Penetrating wounds, usually from bullets or shrapnel, are another etiology. Most traumatic aneurysms are pseudoaneurysms, meaning that they are hematoma cavities contained by the soft tissues adjacent to an arterial laceration. As the hematoma organizes and resolves, it becomes surrounded by a fibrous pseudocapsule, which is highly prone to rupture.

Cerebral aneurysms are potentially catastrophic lesions and many persons who do survive aneurysms rupture are permanently disabled. Treatment of unruptured aneurysms has low morbidity and mortality, which makes accurate and timely diagnosis important.

Conventional angiography remains the definitive procedure for the preoperative evaluation of aneurysms. However, the cross-sectional imaging modalities, including computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), add indispensable information concerning the size of the lesion, location, presence of thrombus, associated hemorrhage, and the condition of surrounding brain tissue.

Degree of Confidence

Spasm is a good indicator of subarachnoid hemorrhage and underlying brain injury.

False Positives/Negatives

Few false-positive findings occur, but angiography may not reveal the true extent of injury.

More on Brain, Contusion

Overview: Brain, Contusion
Imaging: Brain, Contusion
Follow-up: Brain, Contusion
Multimedia: Brain, Contusion
References

References

  1. Kraus JF, Black MA, Hessol N, et al. The incidence of acute brain injury and serious impairment in a defined population. Am J Epidemiol. Feb 1984;119(2):186-201. [Medline].

  2. Giles GM, Clark-Wilson J. Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Neurofunctional Approach. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 1993.

  3. NIH. Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Statement. Oct 26-28 1998;16(1):1-41. [Medline].

  4. Sosin DM, Sniezek JE, Thurman DJ. Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991. Brain Inj. Jan 1996;10(1):47-54. [Medline].

  5. Thurman DJ, Alverson C, Dunn KA, et al. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: A public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil. Dec 1999;14(6):602-15. [Medline].

  6. Annegers JF, Grabow JD, Kurland LT, Laws ER Jr. The incidence, causes, and secular trends of head trauma in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1935-1974. Neurology. Sep 1980;30(9):912-9. [Medline].

  7. Woo B. The Rehabilitation of People with Traumatic Brain Injury. Malden, MA:. Blackwell Science;2000.

  8. Fife D. Head injury with and without hospital admission: comparisons of incidence and short-term disability. Am J Public Health. Jul 1987;77(7):810-2. [Medline].

  9. Zimmerman RA, Gibby WA, Carmody RF. Head and brain trauma. In: Neuroimaging: Clinical and Physical Principles. New York:. Springer-Verlag;2001: 699-729.

  10. Umile EM, Plotkin RC, Sandel ME. Functional assessment of mild traumatic brain injury using SPECT and neuropsychological testing. Brain Inj. Jul 1998;12(7):577-94. [Medline].

  11. Kant R, Smith-Seemiller L, Isaac G, Duffy J. Tc-HMPAO SPECT in persistent post-concussion syndrome after mild head injury: comparison with MRI/CT. Brain Inj. Feb 1997;11(2):115-24. [Medline].

  12. Laatsch L, Pavel D, Jobe T, et al. Incorporation of SPECT imaging in a longitudinal cognitive rehabilitation therapy programme. Brain Inj. Aug 1999;13(8):555-70. [Medline].

  13. Bigler ED. Neuroimaging in pediatric traumatic head injury: diagnostic considerations and relationships to neurobehavioral outcome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. Aug 1999;14(4):406-23. [Medline].

  14. Collins JG. Types of injuries by selected characteristics. Vital Health Stat 10. Dec 1990;(175):1-68. [Medline].

  15. Fife D, Faich G, Hollinshead W, Boynton W. Incidence and outcome of hospital-treated head injury in Rhode Island. Am J Public Health. Jul 1986;76(7):773-8. [Medline].

  16. Frankowski RF. The demography of head injury in the US. In: Miner M, Wagner KA, eds. Neurotrauma. Vol 1. Boston:. Butterworths;1986:1-17.

  17. Gean AD. Imaging of Head Trauma. New York: Raven Press Ltd;1994.

  18. Grossman RI, Yousem DM. Head trauma. In: Neuroradiology: The Requisites. St. Louis, Mo:. Mosby-Year Book;1994:156-7.

  19. Kraus JF, McArthur DL. Incidence and prevalence of, and costs associated with, traumatic brain injury. In: Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with TBI. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1999.

  20. Kraus JF, Sorenson SB. Epidemiology. In: Silver JM, Yudofsky SC, Hales RE, eds. Neuropsychiatry of TBI. Washington, DC:. American Psychiatric Press;1994: 3-41.

  21. Orrison WW Jr, Moore KR. Neuroimaging & head trauma. In: Neuroimaging. Philadelphia, Pa:. WB Saunders Co;2000: 901-2.

  22. Osborne AG. Craniocerebral trauma. In: Diagnostic Neuroradiology. St. Louis, Mo:. Mosby-Year Book;1994:217.

  23. Rose FD, Johnson DA. Brain Injury and After: Towards Improved Outcome. West Sussex, England:. John Wiley & Sons;1996.

  24. Rosenthal M, Griffith E, Kreutzer J, et al. Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury. 3rd ed. Philadelphia:. FA Davis;1999: 8-9.

  25. Sganzerla EP, Tomei G, Rampini P. A peculiar intracerebral hemorrhage: the gliding contusion, its relationship to diffuse brain damage. Neurosurg Rev. 1989;12 Suppl 1:215-8. [Medline].

  26. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. Jul 13 1974;2(7872):81-4. [Medline].

  27. Whitman S, Coonley-Hoganson R, Desai BT. Comparative head trauma experiences in two socioeconomically different Chicago-area communities: a population study. Am J Epidemiol. Apr 1984;119(4):570-80. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

brain injury, acute traumatic CNS damage, central nervous system injury, head trauma, head injury, skull injury, skull fracture, facial injury, facial soft tissue injury, cranial soft tissue injury, cranial fracture, concussion, brain hemorrhage, cranial contusion, laceration of the brain, punctate parenchymal hemorrhage, microhemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, TBI, coup contusion, contrecoup contusion, brain contusion, scalp hematoma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Denise Morales, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Institute of MI
Denise Morales, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Orlando Diaz-Daza, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Ben Taub General Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine
Orlando Diaz-Daza, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Roman Hlatky, MD, Assistant Professor, Center for Neurosurgical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center
Roman Hlatky, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Congress of Neurological Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

L Anne Hayman, MD, Director of Herbert J Frensley Center for Imaging Research, Professor, Departments of Radiology, Psychiatry, and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine
L Anne Hayman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Heart Association, American Society of Neuroradiology, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Chi-Shing Zee, MD, Chief of Neuroradiology, Professor, Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, University of Southern California School of Medicine
Chi-Shing Zee, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Neuroradiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Robert L DeLaPaz, MD, Director, Professor, Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Columbia University
Robert L DeLaPaz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Neuroradiology, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James G Smirniotopoulos, MD, Professor of Radiology, Neurology, and Biomedical Informatics, Chairman, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
James G Smirniotopoulos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.