Brain Imaging in Venous Vascular Malformations 

  • Author: Andrew L Wagner, MD; Chief Editor: James G Smirniotopoulos, MD   more...
 
Updated: May 25, 2011
 

Overview

Venous vascular malformations, also known as venous angiomas or, more properly, developmental venous anomalies (DVAs), represent congenital anatomically variant pathways in the normal venous drainage of an area of the brain. Once thought to be rare, they are now considered to be the most common vascular malformation in the CNS.[1, 2, 3] They may occur in as many as 2% of individuals. See two examples of venous vascular malformations in the images below.

Brain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1-weBrain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1-weighted contrast-enhanced image obtained in a patient who had undergone surgery in the past for an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) shows bilateral developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) and the classic caput medusa appearance. Note the signal intensity abnormality in the inferior right cerebellar hemisphere due to the prior surgery. Brain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1 poBrain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1 postcontrast demonstrates a typical location for a DVA, here within the periventricular white matter. This malformation drained into a cortical vein along the parietal convexity.Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial T2 imagBrain, venous vascular malformation. Axial T2 image shows that the DVA can be subtle. In this patient, the draining vein is large enough to have a flow void on the image. The parenchymal abnormality is typically not visible. Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial fluid-aBrain, venous vascular malformation. Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery shows some artifactual increased signal within the vessel, which can aid in detection of DVAs on noncontrasted studies.

Although for many years DVAs were commonly called venous angiomas, the newer term DVA has been recommended as more appropriate because the involved vessels are not abnormally formed, but apparently merely dilated. The majority of DVAs are found incidentally and never cause symptoms, although there are isolated reports of patients with syndromes attributed to DVAs (eg, secondary to hemorrhage or thrombosis).

Symptoms from DVAs are thought to be uncommon.[4] Although headaches, dizziness, and ataxia[5] have been associated with DVAs, confidently attributing such generalized symptoms to this common lesion is difficult. Symptoms that are directly related to a DVA most often involve DVA thrombosis and/or adjacent hemorrhage.[6, 7]

While some believe that DVAs can hemorrhage on their own, most notably after venous infarction from spontaneous DVA thrombosis, most instances of hemorrhage with DVAs have been in patients with combined vascular malformations. In the vast majority of these cases, the hemorrhage probably originated from the accompanying vascular malformation rather than from the DVA.

Surgical treatment for DVAs has been advocated, but most experts believe that the resulting risk of an iatrogenic venous infarct would far exceed the risk of irreversible damage from the DVA itself during the patient's lifetime. In fact, most patients with DVAs who become symptomatic have an associated cavernous angioma, which suggests that the symptoms are actually caused by the cavernoma. (See the image below.)

Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial proton Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial proton density–weighted image shows an area of marked signal intensity loss in the right cerebellum adjacent to the developmental venous anomaly (DVA). This finding is consistent with a coexistent cavernous angioma.

DVAs are associated with cavernous angiomas or one of the other types of CNS vascular malformations (ie, arteriovenous malformation [AVM], capillary telangiectasia) in approximately 15-30% of patients. The most frequent conjunction is with cavernous angiomas; indeed, this association is so common that the two may be etiologically related,[8] and the presence of a DVA on an image should prompt a search for a cavernoma, which is more clinically important.[2] DVAs are also associated with head and neck venous malformations and hemangiomas. Rarely, DVAs are associated with varices.[9]

Preferred examination

Although contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning and nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reveal a DVA, the preferred imaging technique is contrast-enhanced MRI because of its excellent depiction of the small venules and draining vein. The multiplanar capabilities of MRI are especially useful because the typical configuration of a DVA is often best recognized in the coronal plane.[10]

Limitations of techniques

Although standard contrast-enhanced MRI is excellent in depicting DVAs, adjacent hemosiderin from associated cavernomas may not be appreciated without the use of gradient-echo or echo-planar imaging, especially with fast spin-echo techniques.

Next

Computed Tomography

Developmental venous anomalies are typically not visible on nonenhanced CT scans but they can be visualized after the administration of contrast medium. They appear as a large vascular structure in the brain parenchyma that drains into the deep or superficial venous system. The smaller surrounding veins are usually arranged in a radial pattern around the central vein. DVAs do not have a surrounding mass effect or edema and the adjacent brain is typically normal.

Degree of confidence

The typical appearance of a DVA on CT scans is often diagnostic but MRI may be needed in atypical cases, particularly those involving the posterior fossa where CT is limited because of streak artifacts.

False positives/negatives

Although arteriovenous malformations can occasionally be mistaken for DVAs on CT scan and vice versa, differentiation between the two is usually not a problem because AVMs have large feeding arteries, tortuous vessels, and abnormal adjacent brain parenchyma that are not observed in DVAs.

Previous
Next

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

On contrast-enhanced MRI, the cluster of veins in developmental venous anomalies has a spoke-wheel appearance (see the first image below); the veins are small at the periphery and gradually enlarge as they approach a central draining vein (see the second and third images below).[11, 12] This appearance has been referred to as caput medusa, or the head of Medusa, because of the serpentine appearance of the curvilinear peripheral draining veins. The intervening brain parenchyma is normal; this is a distinguishing characteristic of a DVA. However, 2 studies reported parenchymal abnormalities within the drainage territory of most DVAs[13, 14]

Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial postconBrain, venous vascular malformation. Axial postcontrast image demonstrates the fine network of feeder veins that converge into the single draining vein. Brain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1-weBrain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1-weighted contrast-enhanced image obtained in a patient who had undergone surgery in the past for an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) shows bilateral developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) and the classic caput medusa appearance. Note the signal intensity abnormality in the inferior right cerebellar hemisphere due to the prior surgery. Brain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1-weBrain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1-weighted contrast-enhanced image clearly shows the draining vein and associated venous network of a developmental venous anomaly (DVA).

The draining vein has a fairly straight course toward the deep or superficial venous drainage system, depending on the location of the DVA. When it is adjacent to the lateral ventricles, the draining vein usually merges with a subependymal vein, which may be enlarged. Other DVAs may drain into cortical veins or dural sinuses in the supratentorial brain (see the images below). Infratentorial DVAs have a variety of possible drainage pathways without a clearly dominant one.

Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial T1 postBrain, venous vascular malformation. Axial T1 postcontrast demonstrates a large DVA originating from the frontal lobe white matter. Note the cluster of small vessels that form the large draining vein. Brain, venous vascular malformation. The large draBrain, venous vascular malformation. The large draining vein is noted to drain into the superior sagittal sinus.

On T2- and proton density–weighted images, the draining vein may demonstrate increased signal intensity, particularly on standard spin-echo images. This appearance is caused by gradient moment nulling. If the vessel is obliquely oriented, a yin-yang symbol appearance may occur because the high signal intensity is misregistered and a signal void appears next to a similarly shaped area of increased signal intensity. In the absence of an accompanying vascular malformation, the surrounding brain tissue should have normal characteristics on T2-weighted images, although a case in which gliosis surrounded a DVA has been reported. Nonenhanced T1 images may show the draining vein as a flow void but DVAs are often difficult to visualize without the use of contrast medium. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images may be relatively normal or can show a subtle increased signal. (See the images below.)

Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial proton Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial proton density–weighted image demonstrates the high signal intensity of the draining vein, which is typical on images obtained with this sequence. Note the yin-yang appearance of the vessel with an area of decreased signal intensity adjacent to the area with increased signal intensity. Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial fluid-aBrain, venous vascular malformation. Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery shows some artifactual increased signal within the vessel, which can aid in detection of DVAs on noncontrasted studies.

Gradient-echo images often show decreased signal intensity in the venous angioma that is not due to hemosiderin but is secondary to the paramagnetic effects of deoxyhemoglobin in the venous blood (see image below). Findings on diffusion images are usually normal.

Brain, venous vascular malformation. On fast low-aBrain, venous vascular malformation. On fast low-angle shot images, both the venous cluster and the draining vein may have mild susceptibility artifact (although not as much as hemosiderin) secondary to the deoxyhemoglobin within the slow-flowing veins (arrows).

Magnetic resonance venography is almost never necessary. If obtained, venograms show the draining vein with some of the surrounding radially arranged veins. Because the DVA provides the venous drainage for a section of brain, anatomically normal venous drainage is not present in that area.

Because DVAs are often associated with other CNS vascular lesions (particularly cavernous angiomas), when a DVA is identified, carefully evaluate the brain and obtain gradient-echo (GRE) images. Cavernomas typically appear as focal areas of blood products that often show different stages of evolution (ie, hemosiderin with extracellular methemoglobin). Capillary telangiectasias are small areas of lacelike enhancement that are dark on GRE images without signal intensity abnormality on T2-weighted images. AVMs have enlarged feeding arteries and tortuous vessels with surrounding gliosis.

Degree of confidence

MRI findings are diagnostic in almost all instances. However, in cases with questionable findings, MR venography usually suggests the diagnosis.

Previous
Next

Angiography

Developmental venous anomalies found on angiograms are almost invariably incidental findings, as they are with newer MRIs, and the diagnosis can be made in almost every instance. When observed, the DVA appears as a blush of contrast enhancement during the venous phase of the study and drains into a large anatomically anomalous vein. In its most frequent location (adjacent to the lateral ventricles), the vein usually drains into a subependymal vein, although superficial drainage also occurs.[15, 16]

Degree of confidence

A DVA has a characteristic angiographic appearance and should not be confused with an AVM; no early filling occurs with a DVA.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Andrew L Wagner, MD  Assistant Professor of Radiology, Instructional Faculty, University of Virginia School of Medicine; Director of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Rockingham Memorial Hospital

Andrew L Wagner, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Neuroradiology, and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Robert A Koenigsberg, DO, MSc, FAOCR  Professor, Director of Neuroradiology, Program Director, Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology Training Programs, Department of Radiology, Hahnemann University Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine

Robert A Koenigsberg, DO, MSc, FAOCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Osteopathic Association, American Society of Neuroradiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD  Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Robert M Krasny, MD  Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation

Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James G Smirniotopoulos, MD  Professor of Radiology, Neurology, and Biomedical Informatics, Program Director, Diagnostic Imaging Program, Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (CNRM), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

James G Smirniotopoulos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Cheong WY, Tan KP. Cerebral venous angioma--a misnomer?. Ann Acad Med Singapore. Sep 1993;22(5):736-41. [Medline].

  2. Zimmer A, Hagen T, Ahlhelm F, Viera J, Reith W, Schulte-Altedorneburg G. [Developmental venous anomaly (DVA)]. Radiologe. Oct 2007;47(10):868, 870-4. [Medline].

  3. Zimmer A, Hagen T, Ahlhelm F, Viera J, Reith W, Schulte-Altedorneburg G. [Developmental venous anomaly (DVA)]. Radiologe. Oct 2007;47(10):868, 870-4. [Medline].

  4. Kovács T, Osztie E, Bodrogi L, Pajor P, Farsang M, Juhász C, et al. Cerebellar developmental venous anomalies with associated vascular pathology. Br J Neurosurg. Apr 2007;21(2):217-23. [Medline].

  5. Fenzi F, Rizzuto N. Ataxia and migraine-like headache in a girl with a cerebellar developmental venous anomaly. J Neurol Sci. Oct 15 2008;273(1-2):127-9. [Medline].

  6. Brasse G, Stammel O, Siemens P, Töpper R. [Thrombosis of developmental venous anomaly and consecutive venous infarction]. Nervenarzt. Jun 2008;79(6):703-5. [Medline].

  7. Vieira Santos A, Saraiva P. Spontaneous isolated non-haemorrhagic thrombosis in a child with development venous anomaly: case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. Dec 2006;22(12):1631-3. [Medline].

  8. Perrini P, Lanzino G. The association of venous developmental anomalies and cavernous malformations: pathophysiological, diagnostic, and surgical considerations. Neurosurg Focus. Jul 15 2006;21(1):e5. [Medline].

  9. Sirin S, Kahraman S, Gocmen S, Erdogan E. A rare combination of a developmental venous anomaly with a varix. Case report. J Neurosurg Pediatrics. Feb 2008;1(2):156-9. [Medline].

  10. Borden NM, Khayata MH, Dean BL. Unusual pattern of a deep developmental venous anomaly on CT and MR studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Nov-Dec 1995;19(6):885-9. [Medline].

  11. Augustyn GT, Scott JA, Olson E. Cerebral venous angiomas: MR imaging. Radiology. Aug 1985;156(2):391-5. [Medline].

  12. Lee BC, Vo KD, Kido DK. MR high-resolution blood oxygenation level-dependent venography of occult (low-flow) vascular lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Aug 1999;20(7):1239-42. [Medline].

  13. San Millán Ruíz D, Delavelle J, Yilmaz H, Gailloud P, Piovan E, Bertramello A, et al. Parenchymal abnormalities associated with developmental venous anomalies. Neuroradiology. Dec 2007;49(12):987-95. [Medline].

  14. Santucci GM, Leach JL, Ying J, Leach SD, Tomsick TA. Brain parenchymal signal abnormalities associated with developmental venous anomalies: detailed MR imaging assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Aug 2008;29(7):1317-23. [Medline].

  15. Huber G, Henkes H, Hermes M. Regional association of developmental venous anomalies with angiographically occult vascular malformations. Eur Radiol. 1996;6(1):30-7. [Medline].

  16. Kesava PP, Turski PA. MR angiography of vascular malformations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. May 1998;8(2):349-70. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1-weighted contrast-enhanced image obtained in a patient who had undergone surgery in the past for an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) shows bilateral developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) and the classic caput medusa appearance. Note the signal intensity abnormality in the inferior right cerebellar hemisphere due to the prior surgery.
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1-weighted contrast-enhanced image clearly shows the draining vein and associated venous network of a developmental venous anomaly (DVA).
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial proton density–weighted image demonstrates the high signal intensity of the draining vein, which is typical on images obtained with this sequence. Note the yin-yang appearance of the vessel with an area of decreased signal intensity adjacent to the area with increased signal intensity.
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial proton density–weighted image shows an area of marked signal intensity loss in the right cerebellum adjacent to the developmental venous anomaly (DVA). This finding is consistent with a coexistent cavernous angioma.
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Coronal T1 postcontrast demonstrates a typical location for a DVA, here within the periventricular white matter. This malformation drained into a cortical vein along the parietal convexity.
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial postcontrast image demonstrates the fine network of feeder veins that converge into the single draining vein.
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial T2 image shows that the DVA can be subtle. In this patient, the draining vein is large enough to have a flow void on the image. The parenchymal abnormality is typically not visible.
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery shows some artifactual increased signal within the vessel, which can aid in detection of DVAs on noncontrasted studies.
Brain, venous vascular malformation. On fast low-angle shot images, both the venous cluster and the draining vein may have mild susceptibility artifact (although not as much as hemosiderin) secondary to the deoxyhemoglobin within the slow-flowing veins (arrows).
Brain, venous vascular malformation. Axial T1 postcontrast demonstrates a large DVA originating from the frontal lobe white matter. Note the cluster of small vessels that form the large draining vein.
Brain, venous vascular malformation. The large draining vein is noted to drain into the superior sagittal sinus.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.