eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Brain/Spine

Diffuse Axonal Injury: Imaging

Author: Jeffrey R Wasserman, DO, Staff Physician, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical College of Pennsylvania-Hahnemann University Hospital
Coauthor(s): Robert A Koenigsberg, DO, MSc, FAOCR, Director of Neuroradiology, Professor, Department of Radiology, Drexel University College of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 26, 2007

Radiography

Findings

No specific findings related to DAI can be made using conventional radiography; however, other signs of head trauma can be appreciated, such as facial bone fractures or fluid levels within the paranasal sinuses.

Degree of Confidence

The degree of confidence is low, since conventional radiography cannot demonstrate subtle soft-tissue changes. While radiographs can clearly demonstrate skull fracture, this is not helpful in DAI, since DAI is rarely associated with skull fracture.

False Positives/Negatives

Many false negatives are possible, since a negative skull radiograph in no way excludes a parenchymal brain injury.

Computed Tomography

Findings

Among patients eventually proven to have DAI, 50-80% demonstrate a normal CT scan upon presentation. Delayed CT scanning may be helpful in demonstrating edema or atrophy, which are later findings. Small petechial hemorrhages, located at the gray-white matter junction, as well as in the corpus callosum and brainstem, are characteristic of CT-scan findings in the acute setting.

The following CT-scan criteria have been suggested by Wang and colleagues2 :

  • One or more small intraparenchymal hemorrhages less than 2 cm in diameter, located in the cerebral hemispheres
  • Intraventricular hemorrhage
  • Hemorrhage in the corpus callosum
  • Small focal areas of hemorrhage less than 2 cm in diameter, adjacent to the third ventricle
  • Brainstem hemorrhage

One may also observe small focal areas of low density on CT scans; these correspond to areas of edema occurring where shearing injury took place.

MRI is more sensitive in the detection of subtle soft-tissue abnormalities; however, CT scanning is more available and practical in the current medical environment and is therefore, according to Teasdale, the "mainstay of acute investigation of head injury."3

Degree of Confidence

The degree of confidence in CT scanning is moderate, since the only finding may be petechial hemorrhage, and fewer than 20% of patients with DAI demonstrate this finding on CT scanning alone. When petechial hemorrhages are observed with the appropriate clinical findings, the sensitivity of CT scanning in the detection of DAI is high.

False Positives/Negatives

As with conventional radiographs, frequent false negatives are possible, since normal CT-scan findings are common in patients with DAI.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

Recommended sequences include T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2 – gradient-echo, proton density – weighted, and diffusion-weighted images.

  • T1-weighted images are helpful for anatomic localization; however, nonhemorrhagic lesions may be isointense to surrounding tissue. Hemorrhagic lesions appear hyperintense on T1-weighted images. Nonhemorrhagic lesions appear hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences. Diffusion-weighted sequences can reveal hyperintensities in areas of axonal injury.
  • Gradient-echo sequences are particularly useful in demonstrating the paramagnetic effects of petechial hemorrhages. Gradient-echo imaging can often demonstrate signal abnormality in areas that appear normal in T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences. For this reason, gradient-echo imaging has become a mainstay of MRI exams for patients with suggested shearing-type injuries. The abnormal signal on gradient-echo images can persist for many years after the injury.
  • The most common MRI finding is the presence of multifocal areas of abnormal signal (bright on T2-weighted images) at the white matter in the temporal or parietal corticomedullary junction or in the splenium of the corpus callosum.
  • Other areas that frequently are abnormal include the dorsolateral rostral midbrain and the corona radiata (see DAI stages in Anatomy).
  • Eventually, nonspecific atrophic changes are observed.

One area of research has been magnetization transfer imaging. Studies have reported that the magnetic transfer ratio has shown promise in identifying areas of injury not visible on the above MRI pulse sequences. This may allow the radiologist to appreciate a truer representation of the degree of microscopic injury. Studies have indicated that MRI can play a role in predicting the length of coma in DAI patients. The volume of white-matter lesions has been correlated to the degree of injury, as measured by MRI. MRI has also been used to quantify cerebral blood flow in damaged areas of the brain, thus predicting injury severity.

Degree of Confidence

The degree of confidence is high, since abnormal signal in the characteristic locations, discovered in the clinical setting of recent trauma, leaves little doubt about the diagnosis of DAI.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive neurologic disorder that can involve multiple foci of white-matter signal abnormality on MRI; however, MS lesions typically are oval or oblong and are oriented in a direction perpendicular to the border of the lateral ventricles (Dawson fingers). In addition, MS lesions may involve the spinal cord, a finding not associated with DAI, and the clinical course of MS is dramatically different from that of DAI.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Nuclear medicine currently has no role in the routine diagnostic workup of patients with possible DAI; however, studies have suggested that iodine-123 single-photon emission CT (SPECT) imaging demonstrates areas of hypoperfusion in areas of known injury and reveals additional areas of injury not visualized with MRI.

More on Diffuse Axonal Injury

Overview: Diffuse Axonal Injury
Imaging: Diffuse Axonal Injury
Follow-up: Diffuse Axonal Injury
Multimedia: Diffuse Axonal Injury
References

References

  1. Holbourn AHS. Mechanics of head injuries. Lancet. 1943;2:438-41.

  2. Wang H, Duan G, Zhang J, et al. Clinical studies on diffuse axonal injury in patients with severe closed head injury. Chin Med J (Engl). Jan 1998;111(1):59-62. [Medline].

  3. Teasdale GM. Head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. May 1995;58(5):526-39. [Medline].

  4. Adams JH, Jennett B, McLellan DR, et al. The neuropathology of the vegetative state after head injury. J Clin Pathol. Nov 1999;52(11):804-6. [Medline][Full Text].

  5. Atlas SW, ed. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1996.

  6. Gean AD. Imaging of Head Trauma. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994.

  7. Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B. MR imaging of head trauma: review of the distribution and radiopathologic features of traumatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Mar 1988;150(3):663-72. [Medline].

  8. Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B, et al. Prospective comparative study of intermediate-field MR and CT in the evaluation of closed head trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Mar 1988;150(3):673-82. [Medline].

  9. Gieron MA, Korthals JK, Riggs CD. Diffuse axonal injury without direct head trauma and with delayed onset of coma. Pediatr Neurol. Nov 1998;19(5):382-4. [Medline].

  10. Gleckman AM, Bell MD, Evans RJ, et al. Diffuse axonal injury in infants with nonaccidental craniocerebral trauma: enhanced detection by beta-amyloid precursor protein immunohistochemical staining. Arch Pathol Lab Med. Feb 1999;123(2):146-51. [Medline].

  11. Ito H, Ishii K, Onuma T, et al. Cerebral perfusion changes in traumatic diffuse brain injury; IMP SPECT studies. Ann Nucl Med. May 1997;11(2):167-72. [Medline].

  12. McGowan JC, McCormack TM, Grossman RI, et al. Diffuse axonal pathology detected with magnetization transfer imaging following brain injury in the pig. Magn Reson Med. Apr 1999;41(4):727-33. [Medline].

  13. Ommaya AK, Gennarelli TA. Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Correlation of experimental and clinical observations of blunt head injuries. Brain. Dec 1974;97(4):633-54. [Medline].

  14. Osborn AG. Diagnostic Neuroradiology. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1994:212-5.

  15. Wilson JT, Hadley DM, Wiedmann KD, et al. Neuropsychological consequences of two patterns of brain damage shown by MRI in survivors of severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Sep 1995;59(3):328-31. [Medline].

  16. Yamamoto T, Koeda T, Ishii S, et al. A patient with cerebral palsy whose mother had a traffic accident during pregnancy: a diffuse axonal injury?. Brain Dev. Jul 1999;21(5):334-6. [Medline].

  17. Okamoto T, Hashimoto K, Aoki S, et al. Cerebral blood flow in patients with diffuse axonal injury--examination of the easy Z-score imaging system utility. Eur J Neurol. May 2007;14(5):540-7. [Medline].

  18. de la Plata CM, Ardelean A, Koovakkattu D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of diffuse axonal injury: quantitative assessment of white matter lesion volume. J Neurotrauma. Apr 2007;24(4):591-8. [Medline].

  19. Zheng WB, Liu GR, Li LP, et al. Prediction of recovery from a post-traumatic coma state by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with diffuse axonal injury. Neuroradiology. Mar 2007;49(3):271-9. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

DAI, axonal shear injury, axonal shear-strain injury, traumatic brain injuries

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Jeffrey R Wasserman, DO, Staff Physician, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical College of Pennsylvania-Hahnemann University Hospital
Jeffrey R Wasserman, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Robert A Koenigsberg, DO, MSc, FAOCR, Director of Neuroradiology, Professor, Department of Radiology, Drexel University College of Medicine
Robert A Koenigsberg, DO, MSc, FAOCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Osteopathic Association, American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic Neuroradiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Jeffrey L Creasy, MD, Associate Professor, Associate Section Head, Division of Neuroradiology, Director, Neuroradiology Fellowship, Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University
Jeffrey L Creasy, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Robert L DeLaPaz, MD, Director, Professor, Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Columbia University
Robert L DeLaPaz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Neuroradiology, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James G Smirniotopoulos, MD, Professor of Radiology, Neurology, and Biomedical Informatics, Chairman, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
James G Smirniotopoulos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.