eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Brain/Spine

Multiple Sclerosis, Spine: Imaging

Author: Djamil Fertikh, MD, Attending Physician, Division of Radiology, Association of Alexandria Radiologists
Coauthor(s): Michael L Brooks, MD, JD, FCLM, Clinical Associate Professor of Radiology, Drexel University School of Medicine; Adjunct Associate Professor of Radiology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine; Director of Neuroradiology, Mercy Diagnostic Imaging
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: May 24, 2008

Computed Tomography

Findings

With the advancement of MRI, evaluation of the spinal cord using axial computed tomography (CT) scanning was abandoned because of its poor sensitivity. Large, masslike lesions can occasionally mimic a neoplasm, and characterizing them can be difficult.

Degree of Confidence

As a result of CT scanning's poor sensitivity, the detection, evaluation, and characterization of MS lesions and enhancement patterns are limited with this modality.

False Positives/Negatives

Primary and secondary neoplasms of the spinal cord (astrocytomas, ependymomas), infection, transverse myelitis, acute infarction, sarcoidosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus may mimic demyelinating MS plaques.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings


Sagittal, T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of...

Sagittal, T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of the cervical spinal cord in a 27-year-old woman showing a fusiform area of increased signal intensity representing a multiple sclerosis plaque. Same patient as in Image 2.

Sagittal, T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of...

Sagittal, T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of the cervical spinal cord in a 27-year-old woman showing a fusiform area of increased signal intensity representing a multiple sclerosis plaque. Same patient as in Image 2.


Corresponding axial, T2-weighted magnetic resonan...

Corresponding axial, T2-weighted magnetic resonance image in a 27-year-old woman showing a multiple sclerosis plaque located in the left dorsolateral region of the left hemicord. Same patient as in Image 1.

Corresponding axial, T2-weighted magnetic resonan...

Corresponding axial, T2-weighted magnetic resonance image in a 27-year-old woman showing a multiple sclerosis plaque located in the left dorsolateral region of the left hemicord. Same patient as in Image 1.


Gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted image showing en...

Gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted image showing enhancement of the left optic nerve (arrow). Same patient as in Image 7.

Gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted image showing en...

Gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted image showing enhancement of the left optic nerve (arrow). Same patient as in Image 7.


Corresponding axial images of the spinal cord sho...

Corresponding axial images of the spinal cord showing enhancing plaque (arrow). The combination of optic neuritis and spinal cord lesion constitutes Devic neuromyelitis optica. Same patient as in Image 6.

Corresponding axial images of the spinal cord sho...

Corresponding axial images of the spinal cord showing enhancing plaque (arrow). The combination of optic neuritis and spinal cord lesion constitutes Devic neuromyelitis optica. Same patient as in Image 6.


Sagittal, T2-weighted image showing a focal area ...

Sagittal, T2-weighted image showing a focal area of spinal cord atrophy in a patient with long-standing multiple sclerosis.

Sagittal, T2-weighted image showing a focal area ...

Sagittal, T2-weighted image showing a focal area of spinal cord atrophy in a patient with long-standing multiple sclerosis.


MRI far exceeds CT scanning in the ability to demonstrate intramedullary pathology; MRI is currently used for the first-line investigation.6

Depending on their age, multiple sclerosis (MS) plaques appear on unenhanced, T1-weighted images as areas of slightly low to low signal intensity. Plaques may appear as nodules, rings, or arcs and generally are less than 2 vertebral bodies in length.7 Plaques usually demonstrate prompt enhancement after the administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent, which most often indicates active disease.8 The enhancement may last 2-8 weeks. Steroids typically do not suppress the enhancement of the active plaques. Classic chronic lesions do not demonstrate contrast enhancement.

Most MS plaques appear hyperintense on T2-weighted images. The spinal cord may or may not be focally enlarged. Enlargement of the cord is usually seen with active disease. Larger active lesions may have extensive edema with associated cord expansion. Chronic lesions often demonstrate focal cord atrophy. Spinal lesions usually coexist with more severe concomitant brain plaques. As many as 20% of spinal MS lesions are isolated. Spinal cord narrowing due to atrophic changes is present in 10% of patients with spinal cord involvement.

Tumefacient MS may mimic a neoplasm; a demyelinating process should always be considered if a masslike lesion is encountered. As is the case in the brain, a ring or arc of enhancement can often be found, as opposed to a more nodular or masslike enhancement. Follow-up studies are helpful.

Although not widely implemented, newer methods may be more specific in evaluating MS plaques.9 These methods include magnetization transfer and diffusion, as well as proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).10,11

Typically, fast-FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) sequences have been shown to have a lower sensitivity than do fast spin-echo sequences (FSE) for depicting spinal cord MS lesions.12,13,14

Studies have suggested that more cervical cord MS lesions can be revealed with magnetization transfer–prepared gradient-echo and fast-STIR (short TI inversion recovery) sequences than with FSE sequences, with fast-STIR demonstrating the greatest sensitivity.13,15,16,17,18

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist], gadobenate dimeglumine [MultiHance], gadodiamide [Omniscan], gadoversetamide [OptiMARK], gadoteridol [ProHance]) have been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). For more information, see the eMedicine topic Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy. The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) scans.

NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble moving or straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness. For more information, see the FDA Public Health Advisory or Medscape.

Degree of Confidence

Although MRI is not specific, it is considered the most sensitive imaging modality for diagnosing spinal cord MS, for evaluating its extent, and for following up the response to treatment. MRI is more sensitive for identifying active plaques than is double-dose CT scanning or clinical examination.

False Positives/Negatives

The main differentials include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Primary or metastatic spinal cord neoplasms (eg, astrocytomas, ependymomas) - The presence of cysts and hemorrhage support the diagnosis of neoplasm.
  • ADEM - This may show enhancement. The concomitant presence of brain lesions is the rule. It runs a monophasic course; therefore, it does not have the relapsing course of MS. A history of viral infection within the previous 3-4 weeks should alert the radiologist. ADEM is typically monophasic.
  • Sarcoidosis - This involves the CNS in approximately 5% of cases. Concomitant pial involvement is frequently encountered. Enhancement is usually the rule.
  • Transverse myelitis - This term is usually used for idiopathic inflammatory myelopathy. Cord swelling and enhancement may be present, often involving a longer segment than MS. MRI of the brain may be helpful for showing additional lesions in case of MS or ADEM. This condition usually responds to steroid therapy; therefore, a treatment trial is often considered before proceeding with biopsy. This process is typically monophasic.
  • Infarct - This is more common at the thoracic level. Usually, only a single lesion is present. Contrast may be present, although this is not the dominant feature. Signal alteration usually and initially involves the anterior gray matter (anterior spinal artery distribution). The patient's clinical presentation will be acute. Particularly consider this entity if the patient is older and/or has a history of aortic/vascular surgery.
  • Vasculitis - Processes such as systemic lupus erythematosus can result in spinal lesions that mimic MS. Often, multiple lesions are present. However, the clinical history is often known and helps to establish the correct diagnosis.
  • Radiation myelitis - Generally, doses higher than 4000 cGy are required to cause this condition. The latency period is 1-3 years. Chemotherapy may be synergistic. Images may show some peripheral enhancement.
  • Arteriovenous fistula - Usually, this occurs at the thoracolumbar level, and patients are usually older than 50 years, with a long history of back pain. The cord signal abnormality can involve a very long segment. Look for a serpiginous flow void along the cord surface.

More on Multiple Sclerosis, Spine

Overview: Multiple Sclerosis, Spine
Imaging: Multiple Sclerosis, Spine
Follow-up: Multiple Sclerosis, Spine
Multimedia: Multiple Sclerosis, Spine
References

References

  1. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, et al. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. Sep 28 2000;343(13):938-52. [Medline].

  2. Rosati G. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: an update. Neurol. Sci. 2001;22 (2):117–39. [Medline].

  3. Parry-Jones AR, Mitchell JD, Gunarwardena WJ, et al. Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy associated with multiple sclerosis: Harding's syndrome. Pract Neurol. Apr 2008;8(2):118-21. [Medline].

  4. Grossman RI, Yousem DM. Neuroradiology: The Requisites. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1994.

  5. Rovira-Canellas A, Alonso-Farre J, Rio-Izquierdo J. [Magnetic resonance in the clinical and therapeutic follow-up of multiple sclerosis]. Rev Neurol. May 16-31 2000;30(10):980-5. [Medline].

  6. Agosta F, Absinta M, Sormani MP, et al. In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Brain. Aug 2007;130:2211-9. [Medline].

  7. LM Tartaglino, DP Friedman, AE Flanders, et al. Multiple sclerosis in the spinal cord: MR appearance and correlation with clinical parameters. Radiology. 1995;Vol 195:725-32. [Medline][Full Text].

  8. Filippi M. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. Oct 2000;6(5):320-6. [Medline].

  9. Grossman RI, Barkhof F, Filippi M. Assessment of spinal cord damage in MS using MRI. J Neurol Sci. Jan 15 2000;172 Suppl 1:S36-9. [Medline].

  10. Henning A, Schär M, Kollias SS, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the entire human cervical spinal cord and beyond at 3T. Magn Reson Med. Apr 17 2008;[Medline].

  11. Marliani AF, Clementi V, Albini-Riccioli L, et al. Quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human cervical spinal cord at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. Jan 2007;57(1):160-3. [Medline].

  12. Filippi M, Yousry TA, Alkadhi H, et al. Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis with multicoil arrays: a comparison between fast spin echo and fast FLAIR. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Dec 1996;61(6):632-5. [Medline][Full Text].

  13. Hittmair K, Mallek R, Prayer D, et al. Spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of MR pulse sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Sep 1996;17(8):1555-65. [Medline][Full Text].

  14. Stevenson VL, Gawne-Cain ML, Barker GJ, et al. Imaging of the spinal cord and brain in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study between fast FLAIR and fast spin echo. J Neurol. Feb 1997;244(2):119-24. [Medline].

  15. Filippi M, Bozzali M, Horsfield MA, et al. A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MS. Neurology. Jan 11 2000;54(1):207-13. [Medline].

  16. Finelli DA, Hurst GC, Karaman BA, et al. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine. Radiology. Oct 1994;193(1):165-71. [Medline][Full Text].

  17. Rocca MA, Mastronardo G, Horsfield MA, et al. Comparison of three MR sequences for the detection of cervical cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Oct 1999;20(9):1710-6. [Medline][Full Text].

  18. Poonawalla AH, Hou P, Nelson FA, et al. Cervical spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis: T1-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging with phase-sensitive reconstruction. Radiology. Jan 2008;246(1):258-64. [Medline][Full Text].

Further Reading

Keywords

multiple sclerosis, spinal multiple sclerosis, multiple sclerosis of the spine, demyelinating process, brain lesions, spine lesions, perivenular inflammation, plaques, fibrillary gliosis, oligodendroglia, spinal MS, spinal multiple sclerosis, Devic neuromyelitis optica, optic neuritis

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Djamil Fertikh, MD, Attending Physician, Division of Radiology, Association of Alexandria Radiologists
Djamil Fertikh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Michael L Brooks, MD, JD, FCLM, Clinical Associate Professor of Radiology, Drexel University School of Medicine; Adjunct Associate Professor of Radiology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine; Director of Neuroradiology, Mercy Diagnostic Imaging
Michael L Brooks, MD, JD, FCLM is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Legal Medicine, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology, and American Society of Spine Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Mahesh R Patel, MD, Chief of MRI, Department of Radiology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
Mahesh R Patel, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Neuroradiology, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Val Runge, MD, Robert and Alma Moreton Centennial Chair in Radiology, Professor, Editor-in-Chief of Investigative Radiology, Department of Radiology, Scott and White Clinic and Hospital
Val Runge, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Health and Human Values
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James G Smirniotopoulos, MD, Professor of Radiology, Neurology, and Biomedical Informatics, Chairman, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
James G Smirniotopoulos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.