Imaging of Benign Breast Calcifications 

  • Author: Tanya Washington Stephens, MD; more...
 
Updated: Apr 11, 2011
 

Overview

Role of the radiologist

Radiologists who interpret mammograms encounter calcifications on a daily basis (see the images below). Most of the breast calcifications encountered by radiologists are benign. Radiologists must be able to identify typically benign breast calcifications that do not require biopsy to prevent unnecessary procedures and to reduce patient anxiety.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Multiple skin calcifications (arrows). Multiple skin calcifications (arrows). Benign breast calcification. Benign breast calcification.

Typically, benign calcifications that do not require biopsy are skin or dermal calcifications, vascular calcifications, lucent-centered calcifications, eggshell or rim calcifications, coarse or popcornlike calcifications, large rodlike calcifications, round and punctuate calcifications, milk of calcium calcifications, suture calcifications, and dystrophic calcifications.[7, 8]

Distribution of breast calcifications

Breast calcifications are described in terms of type and distribution and categorized according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR).[9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]

Distribution modifiers (grouped or clustered, linear, segmental, regional, diffuse) are used to describe the arrangement of the calcifications. Historically, the terms grouped or clustered were used to describe suspicious calcification. Now, these terms are neutral and may be used to describe benign or malignant processes. Grouped or clustered should be used to describe calcifications that occupy a small volume (< 2 µL) of tissue.[15]

Calcifications that are linearly distributed are arranged in a line and may have branch points.

Segmentally distributed calcifications suggest deposition of calcification in a duct and its branches. This type of calcification may be secondary to benign or malignant processes.

Regionally distributed calcifications are most likely due to benign processes. These calcifications are scattered in a large volume of the breast and do not necessarily conform to a ductal distribution.

Diffusely distributed calcifications are scattered randomly throughout the breast.

ACR BI-RADS lexicon for mammographic findings

The ACR BI-RADS lexicon enables radiologists to use similar terminology to describe mammography findings. This lexicon facilitates data tracking and provides clear management and follow-up recommendations to referring physicians, allied healthcare providers, and patients.

There are 7 ACR BI-RADS standardized categories[10, 11] :

  • Category 0, or "need additional imaging evaluation," is used if additional imaging is needed (this category is almost always used in a screening situation and should be used only rarely after a full imaging workup; additional imaging evaluation includes the use of spot compression and magnification views, along with other tailored mammographic views and ultrasonography)
  • Category 1, or "negative," is used if there are no findings to comment on; for example, the breasts are symmetrical, and no masses, architectural disturbances, or suspicious calcifications are present
  • Category 2, or "benign finding(s)," is used if the radiologist wishes to describe a benign finding while still concluding that there is no mammographic evidence of malignancy
  • Category 3, or "probably benign finding–initial short-interval follow-up suggested," is used when a noted finding has a very high probability of being benign; the finding is not expected to change over the follow-up interval, but the radiologist prefers to establish its stability over time
  • Category 4, or "suspicious abnormality–biopsy should be considered," is used when a finding has a definite probability of being malignant
  • Category 5, or "highly suggestive of malignancy–appropriate action should be taken," is used when a finding has a high probability of being cancerous
  • Category 6, or "known biopsy-proven malignancy-appropriate action should be taken," is "reserved for lesions identified on imaging study with biopsy proof of malignancy prior to definitive therapy"

Typically, benign calcifications will be placed in ACR BI-RADS categories 1 and 2. Sometimes, these calcifications are initially placed in ACR BI-RADS category 0 and, after additional imaging evaluation, are found to have benign features. Early in their development, calcifications (eg, vascular, dystrophic, or lucent centered calcifications) may be indeterminate; these are often followed at short intervals to establish or confirm their etiology (ie, BI-RADS category 3).

Preferred examination

High-quality mammography is the best diagnostic tool for the identification of breast calcifications. Accredited, dedicated mammographic equipment should be used to obtain high-quality images. Mammography technologists must be well trained and skilled in the proper positioning and compression of the breast.[16, 17, 18, 19, 20]

Mammograms should always be interpreted on dedicated high-luminance mammographic view boxes or viewers, and a magnifying glass should be used routinely. Extraneous light and glare should be eliminated for optimal viewing conditions. Mammograms should be arranged in the same manner at each interpretation session to minimize left-right confusion.

Routine mammograms should include craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views. That is, the 2 mammographic views usually obtained first for screening or diagnostic evaluations are the MLO view and the CC view. Magnification images of calcifications should be obtained in the CC and mediolateral (ML) or lateromedial (LM) views, also known as true lateral views. Tangential views are useful for verification of the intradermal location of calcifications.

Comparing current mammograms with prior mammograms is essential to determine the stability of any calcifications detected. Finally, on the basis of the interpretation, the radiologist can make an informed decision about whether the calcifications identified are benign and do not require biopsy or whether the appearance of the calcifications warrants biopsy.

Limitations of techniques

Mammography is limited in evaluating benign calcifications when benign calcifications morphologically overlap with indeterminate or malignant calcifications. These calcifications may be observed for a short period (ACR BI-RADS category 3), or biopsy may be performed (ACR BI-RADS categories 4 and 5).

Patient education

For patient education information, see the Imaging Center, Cancer and Tumors Center, and Women's Health Center, as well as Mammogram, Breast Lumps and Pain, and Breast Self-Exam.

Next

Mammogram

Skin or dermal calcifications

Skin or dermal calcifications (see the image below) are usually identified as spherical, lucent-centered calcifications at the periphery of the breast, especially in the inferior, posterior, and medial aspects.[21, 22] Skin calcifications may develop from a degenerative metaplastic process. Usually, skin calcifications are readily distinguished as benign findings. However, in some cases, additional imaging is needed to differentiate skin calcifications from more worrisome calcifications.

Multiple skin calcifications (arrows). Multiple skin calcifications (arrows).

When mammograms are compared, calcifications that maintain a fixed relationship to one another are suggestive of a dermal location. Magnification views may be used to demonstrate the lucent centers characteristic of skin calcifications. In some cases, a skin localization procedure may be needed to prove that the calcifications are in the skin.

When performing a skin localization procedure, the radiologist should determine if the calcifications are more likely to be in the upper or the lower portion of the breast. Thereafter, the patient's breast is placed in the mammographic unit by using a fenestrated compression device. For calcifications presumed to be in the upper part of the breast, a CC approach is used with the fenestration device in the region of the calcifications. For calcifications thought to be in the inferior part of the breast, a caudocranial approach is used. A metal marker is then placed over the calcifications, and a tangential view is obtained to show the dermal calcifications in the skin.

Vascular calcifications

Vascular calcifications (shown below) are commonly identified on mammography, especially in older women. Vascular calcifications, which are usually secondary to medial atherosclerosis, often demonstrate a characteristic train tracklike configuration. In some cases, it may be difficult to distinguish vascular calcifications from ductal calcifications (including calcifications representing ductal carcinoma in situ). Arterial calcification in the breasts may be associated with diabetes and hyperparathyroidism.

Scattered vascular calcifications with train trackScattered vascular calcifications with train track—like appearance (arrows).

The presence of mammary vascular calcifications may allow for the detection of women with elevated cardiovascular disease risk profiles.[23, 24, 25, 26] Researchers in the Netherlands examined 12,239 women in a population-based breast cancer screening program. The study showed a significant correlation between vascular calcifications identified on mammography and myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attacks, and hypertension. Additional studies are needed to validate the potential role for screening mammography in the early detection of women at risk for cardiovascular disease.

Lucent-centered calcifications

Lucent-centered calcifications, as depicted below, which are round or oval, are almost always benign and they have thicker walls than those of rim or eggshell calcifications. Skin calcifications are often lucent-centered, and lucent-centered calcifications may form around benign debris in the ducts. Other entities that may appear as lucent-centered calcifications on mammography include silicone granulomas and fat necrosis.

This patient was in a car accident and sustained aThis patient was in a car accident and sustained a seatbelt injury. The lucent-centered calcifications seen are typical of fat necrosis. This patient underwent breast-conserving surgery. This patient underwent breast-conserving surgery. The lucent-centered calcifications (arrow) are typical of fat necrosis. Multiple silicone granulomas are lucent-centered cMultiple silicone granulomas are lucent-centered calcifications.

Fat necrosis results from several causes including trauma, surgery, and radiation therapy. Fat necrosis occurs most often in fatty pendulous breasts of middle-aged women. Lucent-centered calcifications may result from fat necrosis, and the thickness of the calcified wall around the lucent area is variable and probably related to the amount of desmoplastic reaction.

Eggshell or rim calcifications

Eggshell or rim calcifications, shown below, are thin and appear as calcium deposited on the surface of a sphere. The walls of eggshell or rim calcifications are thinner than the walls of lucent-centered calcifications.

Eggshell or rim calcifications (arrows) have wallsEggshell or rim calcifications (arrows) have walls thinner than those of lucent-centered calcifications.

The entire circumference of an eggshell calcification does not need to be completely calcified to represent a benign finding. Although fat necrosis can result in eggshell calcifications, calcification in the walls of cysts is the most common cause of eggshell or rim calcifications.

Coarse or popcornlike calcifications

Coarse or popcornlike calcifications, as shown below, are associated with the involution and hyaline degeneration of fibroadenomas. Fibroadenomas are the most common breast masses seen in women younger than 35 years of age.

This mass with associated large, coarse calcificatThis mass with associated large, coarse calcifications (arrows) is a degenerating fibroadenoma. Calcifications associated with fibroadenomas have Calcifications associated with fibroadenomas have been termed popcorn calcifications because of their large size and dense, coarse appearance.

Calcifications in fibroadenomas usually begin at the periphery and then involve the central portion of the fibroadenoma. Fibroadenomas may be completely replaced by calcification without a mass discernible by mammography.

Large rodlike or secretory calcifications

Large rodlike or secretory calcifications (see below) are oriented along the axes of the ductal system. These calcifications result from calcification of ductal secretions.

Large rodlike or secretory calcifications are orieLarge rodlike or secretory calcifications are oriented along the axis of the breast ductal system.

Large rodlike calcifications may have lucent centers if the ductal secretions undergo peripheral calcification. In general, these calcifications are coarser and larger (usually > 1 mm in diameter) than malignant calcifications. Large rodlike calcifications are commonly bilateral and diffuse. These calcifications are associated with secretory disease, plasma cell mastitis, and duct ectasia.

Round and punctate calcifications

Punctate calcifications, like in the image below, are spherical calcifications that have well-defined margins.

Scattered round and punctate calcifications (arrowScattered round and punctate calcifications (arrows).

Punctate calcifications usually measure less than 0.5 mm in diameter. Round calcifications are benign spherical calcifications that may vary in size. When less than 1 mm, round calcifications are frequently formed in the acini of the lobules.

Milk of calcium

Milk of calcium (see below) is a benign process that can be diagnosed readily during mammography, especially with magnification views in the CC and the true lateral (ML or LM) projections.[27]

Left, On the craniocaudal (CC) magnification view,Left, On the craniocaudal (CC) magnification view, milk of calcium appears poorly defined and smudgy (arrows). Right, On the mediolateral (ML) or the lateromedial (LM) magnification view, milk of calcium is seen as sharply defined, crescent-shaped, semilunar, curvilinear (concave up), or linear arrangements (arrows).

When milk of calcium is imaged with a vertical x-ray beam on the CC view, the calcifications appear poorly defined and smudgy. When imaged with a horizontal x-ray beam on the ML or the LM view, the calcifications are seen as sharply defined, crescent-shaped, semilunar, curvilinear (concave up), or linear arrangements. The characteristic appearance of the calcifications on the magnification views helps to establish the correct diagnosis of milk of calcium.

Suture calcifications

Suture material (see the image below) may become calcified, resulting in suture calcifications.[28, 29] Suture calcifications are usually seen at a known surgical site, and the calcifications may be linear or tubular. Knots may be demonstrated. Suture calcifications are likely due to delayed resorption of catgut sutures, which can provide a matrix on which calcium can precipitate.

Knotted suture calcifications. Knotted suture calcifications.

Suture calcifications are more common in women who have undergone radiation therapy compared with those who have had benign breast biopsy. Radiation therapy results in delayed tissue healing, and it is likely that suture resorption is also delayed in the radiated breast, allowing for the precipitation of calcium in the catgut sutures. The earliest time at which calcified suture material may become evident on mammography is within 2 years of surgery.

Dystrophic calcifications

Dystrophic calcifications, as shown in the image below, may form secondary to trauma, surgery, or irradiation.

This patient's breast was burned. The irregular, lThis patient's breast was burned. The irregular, large calcifications are dystrophic.

Most often irregular, dystrophic calcifications are usually larger than 0.5 mm, and they may have lucent centers.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Tanya Washington Stephens, MD  Assistant Professor of Diagnostic Imaging, Associate Professor of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Breast Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Tanya Washington Stephens, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Gary J Whitman, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Gary J Whitman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology and American Roentgen Ray Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD  Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Edward Azavedo, MD, PhD  Director of Clinical Breast Imaging Services, Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden

Edward Azavedo, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Swedish Medical Association and Swedish Society of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Robert M Krasny, MD  Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation

Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Borecky N, Rickard M. Preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma within fibroadenoma on screening mammograms. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. Feb 2008;52(1):64-7. [Medline].

  2. Lehman CD, Rutter CM, Eby PR, White E, Buist DS, Taplin SH. Lesion and patient characteristics associated with malignancy after a probably benign finding on community practice mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 2008;190(2):511-5. [Medline].

  3. Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, Sickles EA, Lehman CD, Geller BM, et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology. Oct 2006;241(1):55-66. [Medline].

  4. Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Geller BM, Leung JW, Rosenberg RD, et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology. Jun 2005;235(3):775-90. [Medline].

  5. Stephens TW, Whitman GJ, Stelling CB. Typical benign calcifications of the breast that do not require biopsy. The Radiologist. 2003;10:1-9.

  6. Whitman GJ, Stephens TW, Hopkins K. Benign and malignant breast calcifications. Contemporary Diagnostic Radiology. 2002;25:1-6.

  7. Choi YJ, Ko EY, Kook S. Diagnosis of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of the breast: ultrasonography findings and different biopsy methods. Yonsei Med J. Oct 31 2008;49(5):757-64. [Medline].

  8. Shin JH, Han BK, Ko EY, Choe YH, Nam SJ. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 2009;192(4):W187-91. [Medline].

  9. Masroor I. Effectiveness of assigning BI-RADS category-3 to breast lesion with respect to follow-up. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. Apr 2008;18(4):209-12. [Medline].

  10. American College of Radiology BI-RADS ATLAS and MQSA: Frequently Asked Questions. American College of Radiology BI-RADS ATLAS and MQSA. Available at http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/BIRADSAtlas/BIRADSFAQs.aspx. Accessed May 12, 2009.

  11. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS-Mammography (ed 4). 4th. Reston, Virginia: American College of Radiology; 2003.

  12. ACR. American College of Radiology: Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology;1998.

  13. Cardenosa G, Mendelson E, Bassett L, et al. Appropriate imaging work-up of breast microcalcifications. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. Jun 2000;215 Suppl:973-80. [Medline].

  14. Homer MJ, Marchant DJ, Smith TJ. The geographic cluster of microcalcifications of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Dec 1985;161(6):532-4. [Medline].

  15. Sitzman SB. A useful sign for distinguishing clustered skin calcifications from calcifications within the breast on mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 1992;158(6):1407-8. [Medline].

  16. Bassett LW. Mammographic analysis of calcifications. Radiol Clin North Am. Jan 1992;30(1):93-105. [Medline].

  17. D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. Mammographic feature analysis. Semin Roentgenol. Jul 1993;28(3):204-30. [Medline].

  18. Hoeffken W, Lanyi M. Mammography: Technique, Diagnosis, Differential Diagnosis, Results. Philadelphia:. WB Saunders Co;1977:261.

  19. Linden SS, Sickles EA. Sedimented calcium in benign breast cysts: the full spectrum of mammographic presentations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 1989;152(5):967-71. [Medline].

  20. Sickles EA. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology. Aug 1986;160(2):289-93. [Medline].

  21. Berkowitz JE, Gatewood OM, Donovan GB, Gayler BW. Dermal breast calcifications: localization with template-guided placement of skin marker. Radiology. Apr 1987;163(1):282. [Medline].

  22. Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Homer MJ, Grabbe J. Dermal deposits mistaken for breast calcifications. Radiology. Nov 1983;149(2):592-4. [Medline].

  23. Molloi S, Xu T, Ducote J, Iribarren C. Quantification of breast arterial calcification using full field digital mammography. Med Phys. Apr 2008;35(4):1428-39. [Medline].

  24. Kataoka M, Warren R, Luben R, Camus J, Denton E, Sala E, et al. How predictive is breast arterial calcification of cardiovascular disease and risk factors when found at screening mammography?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 2006;187(1):73-80. [Medline].

  25. Rotter MA, Schnatz PF, Currier AA Jr, O'Sullivan DM. Breast arterial calcifications (BACs) found on screening mammography and their association with cardiovascular disease. Menopause. Mar-Apr 2008;15(2):276-81. [Medline].

  26. Maas AH, van der Schouw YT, Atsma F, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Mali WP, et al. Breast arterial calcifications are correlated with subsequent development of coronary artery calcifications, but their aetiology is predominantly different. Eur J Radiol. Sep 2007;63(3):396-400. [Medline].

  27. Sickles EA, Abele JS. Milk of calcium within tiny benign breast cysts. Radiology. Dec 1981;141(3):655-8. [Medline].

  28. Davis SP, Stomper PC, Weidner N, Meyer JE. Suture calcification mimicking recurrence in the irradiated breast: a potential pitfall in mammographic evaluation. Radiology. Jul 1989;172(1):247-8. [Medline].

  29. Stacey-Clear A, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, et al. Calcified suture material in the breast after radiation therapy. Radiology. Apr 1992;183(1):207-8. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Multiple skin calcifications (arrows).
Scattered vascular calcifications with train track—like appearance (arrows).
This patient was in a car accident and sustained a seatbelt injury. The lucent-centered calcifications seen are typical of fat necrosis.
This patient underwent breast-conserving surgery. The lucent-centered calcifications (arrow) are typical of fat necrosis.
Multiple silicone granulomas are lucent-centered calcifications.
Eggshell or rim calcifications (arrows) have walls thinner than those of lucent-centered calcifications.
This mass with associated large, coarse calcifications (arrows) is a degenerating fibroadenoma.
Calcifications associated with fibroadenomas have been termed popcorn calcifications because of their large size and dense, coarse appearance.
Large rodlike or secretory calcifications are oriented along the axis of the breast ductal system.
Scattered round and punctate calcifications (arrows).
Left, On the craniocaudal (CC) magnification view, milk of calcium appears poorly defined and smudgy (arrows). Right, On the mediolateral (ML) or the lateromedial (LM) magnification view, milk of calcium is seen as sharply defined, crescent-shaped, semilunar, curvilinear (concave up), or linear arrangements (arrows).
Knotted suture calcifications.
This patient's breast was burned. The irregular, large calcifications are dystrophic.
Benign breast calcification.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.