eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Cardiac

Ventricular Septal Defect: Follow-up

Author: Vibhuti N Singh, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI, Director, Suncoast Cardiovascular Center; Chair, Cardiology Division and Cath Labs, Department of Medicine, Bayfront Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor, Division of Cardiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Rakesh K Sharma, MBBS, FACC, FACP, Interventional Cardiologist, The Heart and Vascular Institute of Florida; Hanumanth K Reddy, MD, FACC, Clinical Professor of Medicine, St Louis University Medical School; Associate Chief, Department of Cardiovascular Services, Three Rivers Healthcare; Navin C Nanda, MD, FACC, Director, Heart Station and Echocardiography Laboratories, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 19, 2008

Intervention

General principles, techniques, and goals

Parents of patients with small ventricular septal defects should be reassured of the relatively benign nature of the lesion, and the child should be encouraged to live a normal life, with no restrictions on physical activity. Surgical repair is currently not recommended.

As a protection against infective endocarditis, the integrity of primary and permanent teeth should be carefully maintained; antibiotic prophylaxis should be provided for dental visits (including cleanings), tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, and other oropharyngeal surgical procedures, as well as for instrumentation of the genitourinary and lower intestinal tracts. These patients may be followed by means of a combination of clinical examinations and noninvasive laboratory tests until the VSD has closed spontaneously.

In these patients, electrocardiography is an excellent means of screening for possible pulmonary hypertension or pulmonary stenosis, which is indicated by right ventricular hypertrophy. Echocardiography is used to screen for the development of LV outflow tract pathology (subaortic membrane or aortic regurgitation) and to confirm spontaneous closure.

In infants with a large VSD, medical management has 2 aims: to control heart failure and to prevent the development of pulmonary vascular disease.

Clamshell-type catheter occlusion devices are being tested as a means of closing apical muscular VSDs. Successful transcatheter device closure of trabecular (muscular) and perimembranous VSDs has been reported. Trabecular VSDs have proved more amenable to this technique because of their relatively straightforward anatomy and the presence of a muscular rim, to which the device attaches well. The closure of perimembranous VSDs is technically more challenging and should be considered experimental.

Therapeutic measures are aimed at the control of symptoms of heart failure and the maintenance of normal growth. If early treatment is successful, the shunt may diminish in size and improve spontaneously, especially during the first year of life. The clinician must be alert not to confuse clinical improvement caused by a decrease in defect size with clinical changes caused by the development of Eisenmenger physiology. Because surgical closure may be performed with low risk in most infants, medical treatment should not be pursued in symptomatic infants after an initial trial is unsuccessful. Pulmonary vascular disease may be prevented when surgery is performed within the first year of life.23,24,25,26

Indications and contraindications

Surgical closure of VSD is indicated (1) for patients of any age with large VSDs in whom clinical symptoms and failure to thrive cannot be controlled medically; (2) for infants 6-12 months of age who have large defects associated with pulmonary hypertension, even if symptoms are controlled by medication; and (3) for patients older than 24 months with a Qp:Qs ratio greater than 2:1.

Patients with supracristal VSD of any size are usually referred for surgery because of the high risk of aortic valve regurgitation.

Severe pulmonary vascular disease is a contraindication to surgical closure of a VSD.

Pulmonary arterial palliative banding with repair in later childhood is reserved for complicated cases or very premature infants. Surgical risks are higher for defects in the muscular septum, particularly apical defects and multiple (Swiss cheese–type) VSDs. Patients with these conditions may require pulmonary arterial banding if they are symptomatic; these patients undergo subsequent debanding and repair of multiple VSDs at an older age.

The presence of a significant VSD in the absence of irreversible pulmonary hypertension warrants surgical closure. Signs of significant VSD include the following: the presence of symptoms; a Qp:Qs ratio greater than 1.5:1.0; pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 50 mm Hg; enlarged LV and left atrium; and deteriorating LV function.

Severe pulmonary hypertension is defined as pulmonary arteriolar resistance greater than two thirds the systemic arteriolar resistance. For patients with severe pulmonary hypertension, surgical closure may be safely undertaken under the following conditions: the net left-to-right shunt is at least 1.5:1.0; there is strong evidence of pulmonary reactivity when a pulmonary vasodilator challenge (with oxygen or nitric oxide) is undertaken; or the results of lung biopsy suggest that pulmonary arterial changes are reversible.

Other relative indications for surgical closure include the presence of a perimembranous or outlet VSD with more than mild aortic regurgitation and a history of endocarditis, especially if recurrent.

Outcomes

Results of primary surgical repair are excellent, and complications resulting in long-term problems (eg, residual ventricular shunts requiring repeat operation or heart block requiring a pacemaker) are rare.

After the obliteration of the left-to-right shunt, the hyperdynamic heart becomes quiet, the size of the heart decreases toward the normal range, thrills and murmurs are abolished, and pulmonary artery hypertension regresses. The patient's clinical status improves markedly. Most infants begin to thrive, and cardiac medications are no longer required. Catch-up growth occurs in the majority of patients over the next 1-2 years.

In some instances, after successful operation, systolic ejection murmurs of low intensity may persist for months.

The long-term prognosis after surgery is excellent. Patients with a small VSD and those who have undergone surgical closure without residua are considered to be at standard risk for the purposes of insurability.

For patients with good to excellent functional class and whose LV function was good before surgical closure, life expectancy after surgical correction is close to normal. The risk of progressive aortic regurgitation is markedly reduced after surgery, as is the risk of endocarditis, unless a residual VSD persists. Intraventricular conduction disturbances are slightly increased after surgical closure and may be responsible for the slight increase in risk of sudden death encountered in this patient population.

Follow-up

Yearly cardiac evaluation is suggested for patients not undergoing surgical repair; in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome; in adults with significant atrial or ventricular arrhythmias; and in patients with associated cardiac lesions, such as right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO), LV outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), or aortic regurgitation.

Cardiac surveillance is also recommended for patients who undergo late repair of moderate or large defects, which are often associated with LV impairment and elevated pulmonary artery pressure at the time of surgery. Residual patch or device leaks are seldom of hemodynamic importance, but they may predispose patients to endocarditis. Good dental hygiene and antibiotic prophylaxis are important in these patients.

Medicolegal Pitfalls

  • Ventricular septal defects are usually diagnosed in infants and children.
    • Small VSDs cause louder murmurs due to higher pressure gradients, whereas large VSDs cause murmurs that may be missed unless listened to carefully.
    • Therefore, careful clinical cardiac evaluation of all infants is warranted not to miss this common cardiac defect, which is treatable with surgery.

Special Concerns

  • Physicians must remember to recommend subacute bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis for all patients with ventricular septal defect, large or small.
 


More on Ventricular Septal Defect

Overview: Ventricular Septal Defect
Imaging: Ventricular Septal Defect
Follow-up: Ventricular Septal Defect
Multimedia: Ventricular Septal Defect
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Alabdulgader AA. Congenital heart disease in 740 subjects: epidemiological aspects. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2001;21(2):111-8. [Medline].

  2. Chadha SL, Singh N, Shukla DK. Epidemiological study of congenital heart disease. Indian J Pediatr. 2001;68(6):507-10. [Medline].

  3. Mehta AV, Goenka S, Chidambaram B, Hamati F. Natural history of isolated ventricular septal defect in the first five years of life. Tenn Med. 2000;93(4):136-8. [Medline].

  4. Moodie DS. Diagnosis and management of congenital heart disease in the adult. Cardiol Rev. 2001;9(5):276-81. [Medline].

  5. Mukharji J, Sullivan L. Ventricular septal defect in the 9th decade. Mo Med. Sep 2001;98(9):468-9. [Medline].

  6. Perello Roso A, Osa Saez A, Garcia Casco MP, et al. Bacterial endocarditis in an adult with ventricular septal defect. An Med Interna. 2001;18(7):396-7. [Medline].

  7. Tomita H, Arakaki Y, Yagihara T, Echigo S. Incidence of spontaneous closure of outlet ventricular septal defect. Jpn Circ J. 2001;65(5):364-6. [Medline].

  8. Berthaux XA, Brenot P, Angel C, et al. Multirow detector computed tomography assessment of intraseptal dissection and ventricular pseudoaneurysm in postinfarction ventricular septal defect. Circulation. 2001;104(4):497-8. [Medline].

  9. Stauder NI, Miller S, Scheule AM, et al. MRI diagnosis of a previously undiagnosed large trabecular ventricular septal defect in an adult after multiple catheterizations and angiocardiograms. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(879):280-2. [Medline].

  10. Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M, Perrone A, Francioso A, La Barbera L, et al. Assessment of congenital heart disease (CHD): Is there a role for fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?. Eur J Radiol. Jul 17 2008;[Medline].

  11. Mooij CF, de Wit CJ, Graham DA, Powell AJ, Geva T. Reproducibility of MRI measurements of right ventricular size and function in patients with normal and dilated ventricles. J Magn Reson Imaging. Jul 2008;28(1):67-73. [Medline].

  12. Durongpisitkul K, Saiviroonporn P, Soongswang J, Laohaprasitiporn D, Chanthong P, Nana A. Pre-operative evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging in tetralogy of fallot and pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect. J Med Assoc Thai. Mar 2008;91(3):350-5. [Medline].

  13. Weber C, Weber M, Ekinci O, Neumann T, Deetjen A, Rolf A, et al. Atrial septal defects type II: noninvasive evaluation of patients before implantation of an Amplatzer Septal Occluder and on follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging compared with TEE and invasive measurement. Eur Radiol. Jun 21 2008;[Medline].

  14. Attenhofer Jost CH, Turina J, Mayer K, et al. Echocardiography in the evaluation of systolic murmurs of unknown cause. Am J Med. 2000;108(8):614-20. [Medline].

  15. D'Cruz IA, Calderon E, Shearin S. Acquired ventricular septal defect following stab wound color flow Doppler diagnosis. Echocardiography. Jul 1997;14(4):409-10. [Medline].

  16. Fujiwara M, Sase M, Kondou O, Furukawa S. Congenital aneurysm of the muscular interventricular septum in a fraternal case diagnosed by fetal echocardiography. Pediatr Cardiol. 2001;22(4):353-6. [Medline].

  17. Ishii M, Hashino K, Eto G, et al. Quantitative assessment of severity of ventricular septal defect by three-dimensional reconstruction of color Doppler-imaged vena contracta and flow convergence region. Circulation. 2001;103(5):664-9. [Medline].

  18. Miller-Hance WC, Silverman NH. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in congenital heart disease with focus on the adult. Cardiol Clin. 2000;18(4):861-92. [Medline].

  19. Parro A Jr, Carlos Da Silveira L, Francischetti A, et al. Echocardiographic features of ventricular septal rupture with right ventricular aneurysm after acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiography. 1996;13(3):303-8. [Medline].

  20. Sittiwangkul R, Ma RY, McCrindle BW, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of obstructive lesions in atrioventricular septal defects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(1):253-61. [Medline].

  21. Smallhorn JF. Cross-sectional echocardiographic assessment of atrioventricular septal defect: basic morphology and preoperative risk factors. Echocardiography. 2001;18(5):415-32. [Medline].

  22. Schroh AM, Laghezza LB, Domínguez PJ, Brandán V, Nento DE. [Echocardiographic Doppler evaluation of ventricular function in children with an atrial septal defect]. Rev Esp Cardiol. Jun 2008;61(6):595-601. [Medline].

  23. Bauriedel G, Redel DA, Schmitz C, et al. Transcatheter closure of a posttraumatic ventricular septal defect with an Amplatzer occluder device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;53(4):508-12. [Medline].

  24. Gaynor JW. Management strategies for infants with coarctation and an associated ventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(3):424-6. [Medline].

  25. Okubo M, Benson LN, Nykanen D, et al. Outcomes of intraoperative device closure of muscular ventricular septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(2):416-23. [Medline].

  26. Wilkinson JL. Interventional pediatric cardiology: device closures. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67(3 Suppl):S30-6. [Medline].

  27. Miyake T, Yokoyama T, Fukuhara H. Right-to-left shunt through a ventricular septal defect during sedated sleep. Echocardiography. 1998;15(4):385-8. [Medline].

Further Reading

Suspected congenital heart disease in the adult.
American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society.  1998 (revised 2007).  8 pages.  NGC:005988

Keywords

ventricular septal defect, VSD, interventricular septal defect, heart septal defect, membranous VSD, cardiac malformation, congenital cardiac anomaly, interventricular septum, restrictive ventricular septal defect, restrictive VSD, Eisenmenger syndrome, interventricular foramen, congenital heart defect, congenital heart disease, septal defect

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Vibhuti N Singh, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI, Director, Suncoast Cardiovascular Center; Chair, Cardiology Division and Cath Labs, Department of Medicine, Bayfront Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor, Division of Cardiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine
Vibhuti N Singh, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, and Florida Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Rakesh K Sharma, MBBS, FACC, FACP, Interventional Cardiologist, The Heart and Vascular Institute of Florida
Rakesh K Sharma, MBBS, FACC, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of International Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Hanumanth K Reddy, MD, FACC, Clinical Professor of Medicine, St Louis University Medical School; Associate Chief, Department of Cardiovascular Services, Three Rivers Healthcare
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Navin C Nanda, MD, FACC, Director, Heart Station and Echocardiography Laboratories, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Justin D Pearlman, MD, PhD, ME, MA, Director of Dartmouth Advanced Imaging Center, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Radiology, Adjunct Professor, Thayer Bioengineering and Computer Science, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Justin D Pearlman, MD, PhD, ME, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

John D Newell, Jr, MD, FACR, FCCP, FASER, Co-Director of Thoracic Imaging, UCDHSC; Director of Lung Imaging Center, Professor of Radiology and Professor of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, National Jewish Medical and Research Center; Univ. Colorado Hospital
John D Newell, Jr, MD, FACR, FCCP, FASER is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, American Thoracic Society, Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Thoracic Radiology
Disclosure: Siemens Medical Grant/research funds Consulting; Forevision Technologies Ownership interest Consulting; Vida Corporation Ownership interest Board membership; TeraRecon Grant/research funds Consulting; eMedicine Honoraria Consulting

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Eugene C Lin, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Washington Medical School
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.