Intervention
The main clinical decision is determining the appropriate time to drain the empyema. Appropriate imaging may help the clinician in choosing and timing intervention. Choosing the appropriate time to perform drainage is a difficult clinical decision.
In 2000, the American College of Chest Physicians reviewed the literature and issued a consensus statement on the medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions. In the setting of a parapneumonic effusion, the following findings suggest a moderate or high risk for a poor outcome: large, free-flowing effusion (at least half of a hemithorax); loculated effusion or effusion with thickened parietal pleura; positive cultures or Gram stains; pleural pus; and pH < 7.20. When these findings are present, drainage is recommended.
Light's criteria define transudative and exudative effusions. Other investigators have tried to clarify when an exudative effusion should be drained. Laboratory indications for consideration of drainage are the following:
- pH < 7.20
- Glucose level < 60 mg/dL
- Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level > 600 IU/L
- Bacteria on Gram staining
Thoracentesis
Ultrasonography or CT guidance is often used to improve the success of a thoracentesis. Single thoracentesis and a course of antibiotics may be effective at the earliest stages of empyema formation. If the effusion recurs, placement of a chest tube or small-bore catheter for continuous drainage is the next step. The placement of a small-bore catheter (thin-walled, 8-16F catheter) is also often accomplished under ultrasonographic or CT guidance. The small-bore catheter is often more comfortable for the patient than the traditional thoracostomy tube.
Surgical interventions
In the past, a few loculations in an empyema often indicated the need for surgical intervention because the loculations did not drain well. Fibrinolytics increase the success rate of catheter drainage by decreasing the viscosity of the effusion and by dissolving some adhesions. Fibrinolytic therapy has reduced the need for surgery.
Surgical intervention is still required for effusions with multiple loculations that are difficult to drain and for effusions that have not responded to catheter drainage. Empyema at the organizing stage requires surgical intervention.
Surgical interventions may include the following:
- Thoracoscopic debridement
- Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): This relatively new intervention has reduced the frequency of open surgery.
- Open thoracotomy for debridement: This approach is effective when the deposition on the pleural surface remains gelatinous.
- Open surgical decortication: This technique is the most invasive intervention. It is required when thick pleural peels are present on the visceral pleura. The pleural peel prevents reexpansion of the lung if it is not removed.
Medicolegal Pitfalls
- Prompt diagnosis and intervention reduce patient mortality.
- Delaying diagnosis or intervention could worsen the clinical course.
More on Empyema |
| Overview: Empyema |
| Imaging: Empyema |
Follow-up: Empyema |
| Multimedia: Empyema |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Strange C, Sahn SA. The definitions and epidemiology of pleural space infection. Semin Respir Infect. Mar 1999;14(1):3-8. [Medline].
Hasley PB, Albaum MN, Li YH, et al. Do pulmonary radiographic findings at presentation predict mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia?. Arch Intern Med. Oct 28 1996;156(19):2206-12. [Medline].
Kearney SE, Davies CW, Davies RJ, Gleeson FV. Computed tomography and ultrasound in parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Clin Radiol. Jul 2000;55(7):542-7. [Medline].
Antony VB, Mohammed KA. Pathophysiology of pleural space infections. Semin Respir Infect. Mar 1999;14(1):9-17. [Medline].
Aquino SL, Webb WR, Gushiken BJ. Pleural exudates and transudates: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology. Sep 1994;192(3):803-8. [Medline].
Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions : an evidence-based guideline. Chest. Oct 2000;118(4):1158-71. [Medline].
Davies RJ, Gleeson FV. The diagnosis and management of pleural empyema. Curr Opin Pulm Med. May 1998;4(3):185-90. [Medline].
Han KT, Choi DS, Ryoo JW, Cho JM, Jeon KN, Bae KS. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of pyogenic intraventricular empyema. Neuroradiology. Jul 24 2007;[Medline].
Heffner JE. Diagnosis and management of thoracic empyemas. Curr Opin Pulm Med. May 1996;2(3):198-205. [Medline].
Heffner JE. Infection of the pleural space. Clin Chest Med. Sep 1999;20(3):607-22. [Medline].
Light RW. Clinical practice. Pleural effusion. N Engl J Med. Jun 20 2002;346(25):1971-7. [Medline].
Light RW. The management of parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Curr Opin Pulm Med. Jul 1998;4(4):227-9. [Medline].
Lim TK. Management of parapneumonic pleural effusion. Curr Opin Pulm Med. Jul 2001;7(4):193-7. [Medline].
Ploton C, Freydiere AM, Benito Y, Bendridi N, Mazzocchi C, Bellon G. Streptococcus pneumoniae thoracic empyema in children: rapid diagnosis by using the Binax NOW immunochromatographic membrane test in pleural fluids. Pathol Biol (Paris). Oct-Nov 2006;54(8-9):498-501. [Medline].
Sahn SA. Use of fibrinolytic agents in the management of complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyemas. Thorax. Aug 1998;53 Suppl 2:S65-72. [Medline].
Temes RT, Follis F, Kessler RM, et al. Intrapleural fibrinolytics in management of empyema thoracis. Chest. Jul 1996;110(1):102-6. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
organizing effusion, complicated effusion, loculated effusion, pleural pus, intrapleural pus, pleural-space infection
Follow-up: Empyema