eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Chest

Empyema: Imaging

Author: Marc Tobler, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Scott and White Memorial Hospital and Clinic
Coauthor(s): J Michael Holbert, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Scott and White Memorial Hospital and Clinic
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 14, 2007

Radiography

Findings

Free-flowing pleural fluid collects in the dependent portion of the pleural space. On 2-view chest radiographs, pleural fluid obscures the costophrenic angle (see Image 1). Approximately 75 mL of fluid is required to blunt the posterior costophrenic angle on a lateral chest radiograph. Almost 200 mL of fluid is required to blunt the lateral costophrenic angles on frontal radiographs. If loculations have formed, fluid opacity may be seen in a nondependent area. The D configuration of loculated fluid bulging out from the chest wall is a classically described but infrequently observed finding.

Although supine or semierect radiographs do not show pleural effusion as well as upright 2-view chest radiographs do, an ill patient is often unable to stand. A unilateral free-flowing effusion results in increased hazy opacity on the side of the affected hemithorax.

If a pleural effusion is suspected, bilateral decubitus views are recommended. When an effusion is identified, the width of the layering fluid may be measured. If the width of the fluid is <10 mm, the effusion may be managed medically and followed up with serial radiographs. However, if the effusion is wider than 10 mm, thoracentesis or catheter drainage should be performed, if clinically indicated. CT or ultrasonographic guidance is best for placing a pleural catheter for drainage.

Degree of Confidence

When 2-view chest radiographs are used to detect pleural fluid, the sensitivity is 67% and the specificity is 70%. Decubitus views increase the degree of confidence. However, decubitus views are often skipped, and instead, the patient undergoes a CT examination.

False Positives/Negatives

Empyema is not diagnosed strictly on the basis of traditional radiographic findings. Further imaging with CT and confirmation of pleural infection with thoracentesis are usually required to diagnose empyema.

Computed Tomography

Findings

CT is the imaging study of choice for evaluating possible empyema. Depending on the expected clinical management, patients can undergo imaging with or without intravenously administered contrast material. If tapping of a clinically significant pleural effusion is clinically indicated, no intravenous contrast medium is necessary to evaluate for the presence and location of pleural fluid.

The typical empyema is lenticular. Nonenhanced CT scans can demonstrate atypical pleural effusions along the mediastinum, thickened pleurae, loculations in the fissures, septa, or gas bubbles in the pleural space (see Image 2). Gas bubbles in the pleural space strongly suggest an empyema in the proper clinical context (ie, in the absence of recent thoracentesis). Lung windows can demonstrate pneumonia adjacent to the abnormal pleural collection. Soft-tissue windows can demonstrate a cause for the empyema, such as esophageal rupture or mediastinal surgery. 

With most empyemas, enhanced chest CT scans demonstrate the split-pleura sign (see Image 3). This sign can also be seen in chronic pleural effusions. Enhanced CT scans also depict parietal pleural thickening in most cases of empyema.

Empyema necessitatis occurs when the pleural infection extends beyond the thoracic cavity into the chest wall (see Image 5).

Although CT signs can be diagnostic of empyema, a pleural tap is indicated for culturing and sensitivity analysis.

Degree of Confidence

If no interventional procedure has been performed, gas bubbles in a pleural fluid collection are virtually diagnostic of an empyema. Enhancing pleura and thickened parietal pleura are also strongly associated with empyema. In a study of empyema, pleural enhancement was seen in every case, and pleural thickening was seen in 92%.3

False Positives/Negatives

An enhancing pleura sign can be present in chronic pleural effusion and metastatic disease.

Without gas bubbles in a pleural fluid collection or an enhancing pleura sign, the diagnosis of infection in pleural fluid depends on a high level of clinical suspicion confirmed with findings from thoracentesis. Although pleural thickening is present in empyemas, it can also be seen in other diseases, such as chronic effusion or asbestos exposure. A pleural exudate without pleural thickening most likely represents malignancy or uncomplicated pleural effusion.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

MRI is rarely used to image pleural effusion and empyema. It may be useful for evaluating thickening of the pleural membrane when the administration of contrast material is contraindicated.

Degree of Confidence

The degree of confidence in the diagnosis of empyema is moderate.

False Positives/Negatives

MRI is not routinely used to diagnose empyema.

Ultrasonography

Findings

Ultrasonography is an important adjunct in defining the characteristics of a pleural effusion. It may be used to detect small effusions. Ultrasonography also provides information about fluid viscosity, the presence of septa, and the free-flowing or loculated nature of the effusion.

Degree of Confidence

Loculated effusions suggest empyema in the proper clinical context, but the diagnosis must be confirmed with thoracentesis.

False Positives/Negatives

The diagnosis of empyema is not based solely on ultrasonographic results.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Nuclear medicine scans are not used in the routine workup for effusion and empyema. Effusions may be seen on ventilation and perfusion scans. Diffusely decreased unilateral intensity on both ventilation and perfusion studies may suggest a layering effusion.

Degree of Confidence

Nuclear medicine tests are not used as diagnostic studies for empyema.

Angiography

Findings

Angiography does not have a role in the management of empyema. The interventional radiologist may need to perform thoracentesis with imaging guidance, and an indwelling catheter may be needed.

More on Empyema

Overview: Empyema
Imaging: Empyema
Follow-up: Empyema
Multimedia: Empyema
References

References

  1. Strange C, Sahn SA. The definitions and epidemiology of pleural space infection. Semin Respir Infect. Mar 1999;14(1):3-8. [Medline].

  2. Hasley PB, Albaum MN, Li YH, et al. Do pulmonary radiographic findings at presentation predict mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia?. Arch Intern Med. Oct 28 1996;156(19):2206-12. [Medline].

  3. Kearney SE, Davies CW, Davies RJ, Gleeson FV. Computed tomography and ultrasound in parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Clin Radiol. Jul 2000;55(7):542-7. [Medline].

  4. Antony VB, Mohammed KA. Pathophysiology of pleural space infections. Semin Respir Infect. Mar 1999;14(1):9-17. [Medline].

  5. Aquino SL, Webb WR, Gushiken BJ. Pleural exudates and transudates: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology. Sep 1994;192(3):803-8. [Medline].

  6. Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions : an evidence-based guideline. Chest. Oct 2000;118(4):1158-71. [Medline].

  7. Davies RJ, Gleeson FV. The diagnosis and management of pleural empyema. Curr Opin Pulm Med. May 1998;4(3):185-90. [Medline].

  8. Han KT, Choi DS, Ryoo JW, Cho JM, Jeon KN, Bae KS. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of pyogenic intraventricular empyema. Neuroradiology. Jul 24 2007;[Medline].

  9. Heffner JE. Diagnosis and management of thoracic empyemas. Curr Opin Pulm Med. May 1996;2(3):198-205. [Medline].

  10. Heffner JE. Infection of the pleural space. Clin Chest Med. Sep 1999;20(3):607-22. [Medline].

  11. Light RW. Clinical practice. Pleural effusion. N Engl J Med. Jun 20 2002;346(25):1971-7. [Medline].

  12. Light RW. The management of parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Curr Opin Pulm Med. Jul 1998;4(4):227-9. [Medline].

  13. Lim TK. Management of parapneumonic pleural effusion. Curr Opin Pulm Med. Jul 2001;7(4):193-7. [Medline].

  14. Ploton C, Freydiere AM, Benito Y, Bendridi N, Mazzocchi C, Bellon G. Streptococcus pneumoniae thoracic empyema in children: rapid diagnosis by using the Binax NOW immunochromatographic membrane test in pleural fluids. Pathol Biol (Paris). Oct-Nov 2006;54(8-9):498-501. [Medline].

  15. Sahn SA. Use of fibrinolytic agents in the management of complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyemas. Thorax. Aug 1998;53 Suppl 2:S65-72. [Medline].

  16. Temes RT, Follis F, Kessler RM, et al. Intrapleural fibrinolytics in management of empyema thoracis. Chest. Jul 1996;110(1):102-6. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

organizing effusion, complicated effusion, loculated effusion, pleural pus, intrapleural pus, pleural-space infection

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Marc Tobler, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Scott and White Memorial Hospital and Clinic
Marc Tobler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

J Michael Holbert, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Scott and White Memorial Hospital and Clinic
J Michael Holbert, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Amirsys Royalty Other

Medical Editor

Judith K Amorosa, MD, FACR, Clinical Professor and Program Director, Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
Judith K Amorosa, MD, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Thoracic Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

W Richard Webb, MD, Chief of Thoracic Imaging, Professor, Department of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Barry H Gross, MD, Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School; Professor, University of Michigan Cancer Center
Barry H Gross, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, Michigan State Medical Society, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Thoracic Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.