Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis Imaging 

  • Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR; Chief Editor: Eugene C Lin, MD   more...
 
Updated: May 27, 2011
 

Overview

The lungs are one of the most common targets for metastatic disease.[1] Most pulmonary metastases are nodular, but a significant minority is interstitial. Lymphangitic carcinomatosis (LC) refers to the diffuse infiltration and obstruction of pulmonary parenchymal lymphatic channels by tumor. Various neoplasms can cause lymphangitic carcinomatosis, but 80% are adenocarcinomas.[2] The most common primary sites are the breasts, lungs, colon, and stomach.[3, 4] Other sources include the pancreas, thyroid, cervix, prostate, and larynx.[5, 6, 7, 8, 9] LC can also arise from choriocarcinoma, melanoma, or metastatic adenocarcinoma from an unknown primary cancer.[10] Radiographic characteristics of lymphangitic carcinomatosis are presented in theimages below.

Typical radiographic appearance of lymphangitic caTypical radiographic appearance of lymphangitic carcinomatosis in a patient with breathlessness. Diffuse, bilateral reticulonodular opacification with Kerley B lines is noted. Fine reticular opacification with Kerley B lines aFine reticular opacification with Kerley B lines and a tiny left pleural effusion are demonstrated in a patient with a lymphangitic spread of cervical carcinoma.

In a patient with a known malignancy, the usual presenting complaint is breathlessness. Occasionally, patients have a dry cough or hemoptysis. Symptoms often precede the development of any radiographic abnormality.[11, 12, 13]

Preferred examination

Plain chest radiography is the initial investigation of choice in patients presenting with any respiratory symptoms, and this examination is used in staging most cancers.[14, 15]

In the appropriate clinical circumstances or when the chest radiographic findings are equivocal, the next investigation employs high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scanning.[16, 17] Although the appearance of LC on HRCT scans is nonspecific, the observation of certain features in a symptomatic patient with an appropriate history of malignancy is highly suggestive of LC; in such instances, further investigation is generally not required.

Fragmented scintigraphic perfusion defects have been reported in LC, as have ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatches.[18, 19] However, a diagnosis of LC cannot be reliably based on the presence of these features.

Limitations of techniques

The radiographic features of LC are essentially nonspecific, with a diagnostic accuracy of 23%. Furthermore, chest radiographic findings are normal in as many as 50% of patients with histologic evidence of disease.

In comparison, HRCT scanning has higher sensitivity, although, as with radiography, the findings may not be diagnostic. The differential diagnosis includes other malignant conditions, such as lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma, as well as benign entities, such as sarcoidosis.[16]

With LC, perfusion defects on a V/Q scan are nonspecific and are also described in various pulmonary pathologies, the most important of which is pulmonary embolism.

Next

Radiography

On radiographs, LC appears as reticular or reticulonodular opacification, often with associated septal lines (Kerley A and B lines), peribronchial cuffing, pleural effusions, and mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy (20-50% of cases). The images below demonstrate the radiographic characteristics of LC.[15, 20, 21, 22]

Typical radiographic appearance of lymphangitic caTypical radiographic appearance of lymphangitic carcinomatosis in a patient with breathlessness. Diffuse, bilateral reticulonodular opacification with Kerley B lines is noted. Fine reticular opacification with Kerley B lines aFine reticular opacification with Kerley B lines and a tiny left pleural effusion are demonstrated in a patient with a lymphangitic spread of cervical carcinoma.

False positives/negatives

Chest radiographic findings are normal in most patients with LC, with the accurancy of chest radiography in this disease being only 23%. In addition, a false-positive diagnosis may occur with other interstitial lung diseases. On chest radiographs, the linear pattern of Kerley A and B lines has a variety of causes, the most common of which is hydrostatic interstitial edema. Besides LC, other causes include sarcoidosis and interstitial pneumonias. All of these conditions have a similar appearance to congestive heart failure; thus, the differentiation is largely clinically based. LC and interstitial pneumonias are often asymmetrically distributed, a characteristic that may be useful in distinguishing these from pulmonary edema. (See the image below.)[23]

High-grade non–Hodgkin lymphoma mimics lymphangitiHigh-grade non–Hodgkin lymphoma mimics lymphangitic carcinomatosis. Note the diffuse interstitial pattern and a tiny left pleural effusion.
Previous
Next

Computed Tomography

The mainstay of LC detection is HRCT scanning. Although HRCT scanning is a sensitive technique, the findings may not be diagnostic. HRCT scan findings include the following[16, 17, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29] :

  • Irregular, nodular, and/or smooth, interlobular septal thickening
  • Thickening of the fissures as a result of the involvement of the lymphatics concentrated in the subpleural interstitium
  • Preservation of normal parenchymal architecture at the level of the secondary pulmonary lobule
  • Peribronchovascular thickening
  • Centrilobular peribronchovascular thickening, which predominates over interlobular septal thickening in a minority of patients
  • Polygonal arcades or polygons with prominence of the centrilobular bronchovascular bundle in association with interlobular septal thickening (50%)
  • Mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy (30-50%)
  • Pleural effusions (30-50%)

Findings may be unilateral or bilateral, focal or diffuse, and symmetrical or asymmetrical.[30] Focal, unilateral disease accounts for 50% of cases. This pattern is associated in particular with underlying bronchogenic carcinoma. All of the changes described above are often associated with nodular opacities.

The HRCT scan characteristics of lymphangitic carcinomatosis are demonstrated below.

High-resolution computed tomography scan demonstraHigh-resolution computed tomography scan demonstrates smooth and nodular interlobular septal thickening (arrow). High-resolution computed tomography scan demonstraHigh-resolution computed tomography scan demonstrates irregularly thickened septa that have created polygonal arcades (arrow). Prominent axial interstitium with thickened bronchProminent axial interstitium with thickened bronchovascular bundles (solid arrow). Also note the thickening of the fissure secondary to the involvement of subpleural lymphatics (open arrow).

Degree of confidence

Although the appearance of LC on HRCT scans is nonspecific, the development of HRCT scan features in a symptomatic patient with an appropriate history of malignancy is highly suggestive of LC, and further investigation is usually not required.

False positives/negatives

LC may not be recognized in the presence of normal radiographic chest findings. HRCT scan findings of LC also are nonspecific and may be misinterpreted.

The differential diagnosis of LC includes sarcoidosis and other chronic interstitial lung diseases such as silicosis, coal worker's pneumoconiosis, extrinsic allergic alveolitis (hypersensitivity pneumonitis), and cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis, as well as other neoplasms, such as lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma. Most of these diagnoses can be excluded on the basis of the clinical findings alone. The relative absence of polygons and the presence of architectural distortion at the level of the secondary pulmonary lobule strongly suggest fibrosis rather than LC.

Furthermore, parenchymal involvement in sarcoidosis is typically more central and/or perihilar, as well as more bilaterally symmetrical, than it is in LC. LC never appears as honeycombing, and sarcoid granulomas are often subpleural.

Previous
Next

Nuclear Imaging

Fragmented scintigraphic perfusion defects have been reported in LC, as have V/Q mismatches. However, these features are not reliable in the diagnosis of LC.[3, 31] FDG-PET scanning is used in the diagnosis and characterization of primary or secondary lung neoplasms, but its value in the characterization of LC is not well documented.[32, 33, 34, 35, 36]

A 2006 study compared findings from FDG-PET scans with those from HRCT scans in 5 patients with pulmonary LC.[37] The FDG-PET scan activity distribution appeared to be identical to abnormal lung areas (which could be segmental, lobar, or diffuse) observed on HRCT scans. In segmental LC, a linear or a hazy area of FDG uptake extending from the tumor could be seen. An earlier study in 7 patients showed similar results, with the intensity of FDG uptake in the diseased lung being significantly greater than in the normal, contralateral lung.[38]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR  Consultant Radiologist and Honorary Professor, North Manchester General Hospital Pennine Acute NHS Trust, UK

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, British Medical Association, British Society of Interventional Radiology, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of the United States, Royal College of Radiologists, and Royal College of Surgeons of England

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Klaus L Irion, MD, PhD  Consulting Staff, The Cardiothoracic Centre Liverpool NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK

Klaus L Irion, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR  Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Carolyn M Allen, MBBCh, MRCP, FRCR, CCST  Consultant Radiologist, Clinical Director, Department of Clinical Radiology, North Manchester General Hospital, UK

Carolyn M Allen, MBBCh, MRCP, FRCR, CCST is a member of the following medical societies: Society of Thoracic Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Jeffrey A Miller, MD  Associate Adjunct Professor of Clinical Radiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey; Faculty, Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs of New Jersey Health Care System

Jeffrey A Miller, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Society for Health Services Research in Radiology, and Society of Thoracic Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD  Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

W Richard Webb, MD  Professor, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Robert M Krasny, MD  Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation

Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Eugene C Lin, MD  Consulting Radiologist, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine

Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Herold CJ, Bankier AA, Fleischmann D. Lung metastases. Eur Radiol. 1996;6(5):596-606. [Medline].

  2. Mapel DW, Fei RH, Crowell RE. Adenocarcinoma of the lung presenting as a diffuse interstitial process in a 25-year-old man. Lung Cancer. Sep 1996;15(2):239-44. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  3. Stein DL, Freeman LM. Lymphangitic spread of breast carcinoma: scintigraphic pattern with chest x-ray and computed tomography correlation. Clin Nucl Med. Sep 2005;30(9):615-6. [Medline].

  4. Scala R, Aronne D, Del Prato B, et al. Endobronchial metastasis from stomach carcinoma. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. Feb 2000;55(1):6-8. [Medline].

  5. Miller KS, Miller JM. Imaging case of the month. Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis from adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Md Med J. Nov 1994;43(11):989-90. [Medline].

  6. Perez-Lasala G, Cannon DT, Mansel JK, et al. Case report: lymphangitic carcinomatosis from cervical carcinoma--an unusual presentation of diffuse interstitial lung disease. Am J Med Sci. Mar 1992;303(3):174-6. [Medline].

  7. Sawin SW, Aikins JK, Van Hoeuen KH, et al. Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with pulmonary lymphangitic metastasis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jan 1995;48(1):85-90. [Medline].

  8. Wu JW, Chiles C. Lymphangitic carcinomatosis from prostate carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Sep-Oct 1999;23(5):761-3. [Medline].

  9. Shin MS, Shingleton HM, Partridge EE, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Patterns of thoracic metastases. Invest Radiol. Dec 1995;30(12):724-9. [Medline].

  10. Liau CT, Jung SM, Lim KE, et al. Pulmonary lymphangitic sarcomatosis from cutaneous angiosarcoma: an unusual presentation of diffuse interstitial lung disease. Jpn J Clin Oncol. Jan 2000;30(1):37-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Descombes E, Gardiol D, Leuenberger P. Transbronchial lung biopsy: an analysis of 530 cases with reference to the number of samples. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. Aug 1997;52(4):324-9. [Medline].

  12. Levy H, Horak DA, Lewis MI. The value of bronchial washings and bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of lymphangitic carcinomatosis. Chest. Nov 1988;94(5):1028-30. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  13. Poletti V, Poletti G, Murer B, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage in malignancy. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. Oct 2007;28(5):534-45. [Medline].

  14. Ikezoe J, Godwin JD, Hunt KJ, et al. Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis: chronicity of radiographic findings in long-term survivors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1995;165(1):49-52. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  15. Mathieson JR, Mayo JR, Staples CA, et al. Chronic diffuse infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of CT and chest radiography. Radiology. Apr 1989;171(1):111-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  16. Honda O, Johkoh T, Ichikado K, et al. Comparison of high resolution CT findings of sarcoidosis, lymphoma, and lymphangitic carcinoma: is there any difference of involved interstitium?. J Comput Assist Tomogr. May-Jun 1999;23(3):374-9. [Medline].

  17. Potente G, Bellelli A, Nardis P. Specific diagnosis by CT and HRCT in six chronic lung diseases. Comput Med Imaging Graph. Jul-Aug 1992;16(4):277-82. [Medline].

  18. Vattimo AV, Burroni L, Bertelli P, et al. The 'fragmented' scintigraphic lung pattern in pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis secondary to breast cancer. Respiration. 1998;65(5):406-10. [Medline].

  19. Shadan S, Challa S, Hawkins RA. Unusual appearance of thromboembolism on perfusion lung imaging. Clin Nucl Med. Sep 1999;24(9):684-6. [Medline].

  20. Bhargava R, Winer-Muram HT, Kauffman WM, et al. Chest radiographic features of thoracic metastatic disease in adolescents with colon cancer. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24(7):491-3. [Medline].

  21. Masson RG, Krikorian J, Lukl P, et al. Pulmonary microvascular cytology in the diagnosis of lymphangitic carcinomatosis. N Engl J Med. Jul 13 1989;321(2):71-6. [Medline].

  22. NEJM. Pulmonary microvascular cytology in lymphangitic carcinomatosis. N Engl J Med. Jan 4 1990;322(1):59-60. [Medline].

  23. Scalzetti EM. Unilateral pulmonary edema after talc pleurodesis. J Thorac Imaging. Apr 2001;16(2):99-102. [Medline].

  24. Davis SD. CT evaluation for pulmonary metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancy. Radiology. Jul 1991;180(1):1-12. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  25. Hirakata K, Nakata H, Nakagawa T. CT of pulmonary metastases with pathological correlation. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. Oct 1995;16(5):379-94. [Medline].

  26. Johkoh T, Ikezoe J, Tomiyama N, et al. CT findings in lymphangitic carcinomatosis of the lung: correlation with histologic findings and pulmonary function tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 1992;158(6):1217-22. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  27. Munk PL, Muller NL, Miller RR, et al. Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis: CT and pathologic findings. Radiology. Mar 1988;166(3):705-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  28. Spillane RM, Shepard JA, DeLuca SA. High-resolution CT of the lungs. Am Fam Physician. Sep 1 1993;48(3):493-8. [Medline].

  29. Rastogi R, Garg R, Thulkar S, et al. Unusual thoracic CT manifestations of osteosarcoma: review of 16 cases. Pediatr Radiol. Feb 2 2008;[Medline].

  30. Zompatori M, Rimondi MR, Gavelli G, et al. Paraseptal emphysema mimicking unilateral lymphangitic carcinomatosis: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Sep-Oct 1993;17(5):810-2. [Medline].

  31. Kashitani N, Eda R, Masayoshi T, et al. Lobar extent of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis. Tl-201 chloride and Tc-99m MIBI scintigraphic findings. Clin Nucl Med. Sep 1996;21(9):726-9. [Medline].

  32. Acikgoz G, Kim SM, Houseni M, et al. Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (PLC): spectrum of FDG-PET findings. Clin Nucl Med. Nov 2006;31(11):673-8. [Medline].

  33. O JH, Yoo IeR, Kim SH, et al. Clinical significance of small pulmonary nodules with little or no 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT images of patients with nonthoracic malignancies. J Nucl Med. Jan 2007;48(1):15-21. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  34. Acikgoz G, Kim SM, Houseni M, Cermik TF, Intenzo CM, Alavi A. Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (PLC): spectrum of FDG-PET findings. Clin Nucl Med. Nov 2006;31(11):673-8. [Medline].

  35. Digumarthy SR, Fischman AJ, Kwek BH, Aquino SL. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography pattern of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. May-Jun 2005;29(3):346-9. [Medline].

  36. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Sharma A, Shepard JA, Digumarthy SR. FDG PET/CT in assessment of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 2010;194(1):231-6. [Medline].

  37. Acikgoz G, Kim SM, Houseni M, et al. Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (PLC): spectrum of FDG-PET findings. Clin Nucl Med. Nov 2006;31(11):673-8. [Medline].

  38. Digumarthy SR, Fischman AJ, Kwek BH, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography pattern of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. May-Jun 2005;29(3):346-9. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Typical radiographic appearance of lymphangitic carcinomatosis in a patient with breathlessness. Diffuse, bilateral reticulonodular opacification with Kerley B lines is noted.
Endoscopic image of the stomach shows a primary, ulcerating gastric carcinoma.
Fine reticular opacification with Kerley B lines and a tiny left pleural effusion are demonstrated in a patient with a lymphangitic spread of cervical carcinoma.
High-resolution computed tomography scan demonstrates smooth and nodular interlobular septal thickening (arrow).
High-grade non–Hodgkin lymphoma mimics lymphangitic carcinomatosis. Note the diffuse interstitial pattern and a tiny left pleural effusion.
High-resolution computed tomography scan demonstrates irregularly thickened septa that have created polygonal arcades (arrow).
Prominent axial interstitium with thickened bronchovascular bundles (solid arrow). Also note the thickening of the fissure secondary to the involvement of subpleural lymphatics (open arrow).
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.