eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Chest

Mediastinum, Germ Cell Tumors: Imaging

Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, Consultant Radiologist, North Manchester General Hospital, The Pennine Acute NHS Trust, Manchester UK
Coauthor(s): Klaus L Irion, MD, PhD, Consulting Staff, The Cardiothoracic Centre Liverpool NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK; Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute; Nigel Thomas, MBBS, Vice-Chair, Manchester (North) Research Ethics Committee; Honorary Lecturer, Visiting Professor, University of Salford, UK
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 25, 2008

Radiography

Findings


Smooth, well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor w...

Smooth, well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor with heterogeneous attenuation associated with calcific intratumoral nodules suggests a mediastinal teratodermoid. Note also the curvilinear calcification.

Smooth, well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor w...

Smooth, well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor with heterogeneous attenuation associated with calcific intratumoral nodules suggests a mediastinal teratodermoid. Note also the curvilinear calcification.


Coned view of the superior mediastinum shows a we...

Coned view of the superior mediastinum shows a well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor with calcific intratumoral nodules suggestive of a mediastinal teratodermoid. Note also the curvilinear calcification

Coned view of the superior mediastinum shows a we...

Coned view of the superior mediastinum shows a well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor with calcific intratumoral nodules suggestive of a mediastinal teratodermoid. Note also the curvilinear calcification


Smooth, well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor w...

Smooth, well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor with uniform attenuation. At surgery, a mediastinal dermoid was diagnosed. Note the hilum-overlay sign, suggestive of an anterior or posterior mediastinal mass. See also Images 6-7 in Multimedia.

Smooth, well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor w...

Smooth, well-defined anterior mediastinal tumor with uniform attenuation. At surgery, a mediastinal dermoid was diagnosed. Note the hilum-overlay sign, suggestive of an anterior or posterior mediastinal mass. See also Images 6-7 in Multimedia.


Lateral conventional tomogram in the same patient...

Lateral conventional tomogram in the same patient as in Image 4 shows a smooth, well-defined, uniformly attenuating anterior mediastinal mass with no calcification.

Lateral conventional tomogram in the same patient...

Lateral conventional tomogram in the same patient as in Image 4 shows a smooth, well-defined, uniformly attenuating anterior mediastinal mass with no calcification.


Lobulated but smooth and well-defined superior me...

Lobulated but smooth and well-defined superior mediastinal mass with uniform attenuation. See also Image 9 in Multimedia.

Lobulated but smooth and well-defined superior me...

Lobulated but smooth and well-defined superior mediastinal mass with uniform attenuation. See also Image 9 in Multimedia.


Another patient with a biopsy proven anterior med...

Another patient with a biopsy proven anterior mediastinal dermoid extending across both sides of the midline.

Another patient with a biopsy proven anterior med...

Another patient with a biopsy proven anterior mediastinal dermoid extending across both sides of the midline.


Standard chest radiography is usually the first imaging procedure performed in an individual with symptoms referable to the thorax (see Images above and Images 1-2, 4, 8, 10, 13-15, 17-19 in Multimedia).

Most asymptomatic anterior mediastinal masses, particularly benign masses, are discovered incidentally on PA and lateral chest radiographs. The radiographs are often obtained for reasons unrelated to the germ cell tumor (GCT). The lateral chest radiograph is valuable in localizing the mass to the appropriate mediastinal compartment; it provides a clue as to what may be the pathology, and it limits the number of disorders in the differential diagnosis. This information, combined with the patient's age, sex, and associated clinical findings, aids the radiologist in the appropriate choice of further diagnostic techniques.

On chest radiographs, benign tumors appear as well-circumscribed, anterior mediastinal masses. Calcification can be seen in up to 26% of cases. Malignant lesions are less well defined than benign ones; they have fuzzy margins, and they may obliterate fat planes between the great vessels and the pericardium. The sternum may be eroded, and associated lung and bone lesions and mediastinal lymphadenopathy may be depicted. Calcification occurs in less than 1% of malignant anterior mediastinal masses.

Degree of Confidence

Despite major advances in cross-sectional imaging, the conventional chest radiograph retains a major role in the initial diagnosis of mediastinal masses. It guides the clinician in what to ask next in the investigation of the patient with a mediastinal mass. The radiograph may be reassuring when a well-defined asymptomatic anterior mediastinal mass with calcification is detected.

Standard chest radiography is universally available, noninvasive, and inexpensive; it also imparts a low dose of radiation, and the images are easy to interpret.

False Positives/Negatives


Differential diagnosis. Mediastinal widening in a...

Differential diagnosis. Mediastinal widening in a child with acute lymphatic leukemia caused by mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

Differential diagnosis. Mediastinal widening in a...

Differential diagnosis. Mediastinal widening in a child with acute lymphatic leukemia caused by mediastinal lymphadenopathy.


Differential diagnosis. Chest radiograph shows ex...

Differential diagnosis. Chest radiograph shows extensive mediastinal lymphadenopathy due to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Differential diagnosis. Chest radiograph shows ex...

Differential diagnosis. Chest radiograph shows extensive mediastinal lymphadenopathy due to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.


Differential diagnosis. Posteroanterior chest rad...

Differential diagnosis. Posteroanterior chest radiograph shows a mass in continuation with the aortic knuckle. Findings on contrast-enhanced CT confirmed that the mass was an aortic aneurysm (not shown).

Differential diagnosis. Posteroanterior chest rad...

Differential diagnosis. Posteroanterior chest radiograph shows a mass in continuation with the aortic knuckle. Findings on contrast-enhanced CT confirmed that the mass was an aortic aneurysm (not shown).


Differential diagnosis. Posteroanterior (top left...

Differential diagnosis. Posteroanterior (top left) and lateral (top right) chest radiographs and CT scans in mediastinal (bottom left and middle) and bone window (bottom right) show an Askin tumour with bone destruction.

Differential diagnosis. Posteroanterior (top left...

Differential diagnosis. Posteroanterior (top left) and lateral (top right) chest radiographs and CT scans in mediastinal (bottom left and middle) and bone window (bottom right) show an Askin tumour with bone destruction.


As with any other anatomic imaging study, the appearances of an anterior mediastinal mass are nonspecific, with a wide differential diagnosis. Differentiation between benign and malignant lesions may not be possible. CT is superior at depicting calcification and obliteration of fat planes, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and bone erosions. Most patients with anterior mediastinal masses are further evaluated with cross-sectional imaging.

Computed Tomography

Findings


Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows an ill-defi...

Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows an ill-defined anterior mediastinal mass with irregular borders that is infiltrating the mediastinal fat. CT-guided needle biopsy revealed a mediastinal seminoma.

Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows an ill-defi...

Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows an ill-defined anterior mediastinal mass with irregular borders that is infiltrating the mediastinal fat. CT-guided needle biopsy revealed a mediastinal seminoma.


Differential diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced CT thro...

Differential diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced CT through the anterior mediastinum shows a minimally enhancing anterior mediastinal mass. At surgery, a malignant thymoma was diagnosed.

Differential diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced CT thro...

Differential diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced CT through the anterior mediastinum shows a minimally enhancing anterior mediastinal mass. At surgery, a malignant thymoma was diagnosed.


Contrast-enhanced CT through the anterior mediast...

Contrast-enhanced CT through the anterior mediastinum shows a minimally enhancing anterior mediastinal mass. At surgery, a malignant thymoma was diagnosed (see also Image 11 in Multimedia).

Contrast-enhanced CT through the anterior mediast...

Contrast-enhanced CT through the anterior mediastinum shows a minimally enhancing anterior mediastinal mass. At surgery, a malignant thymoma was diagnosed (see also Image 11 in Multimedia).


Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained through the me...

Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained through the mediastinum in 56-year-old man shows an infiltrative enhancing tumor. Note the pleural effusion. Biopsy confirmed a sarcomatous-type germ cell tumor.

Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained through the me...

Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained through the mediastinum in 56-year-old man shows an infiltrative enhancing tumor. Note the pleural effusion. Biopsy confirmed a sarcomatous-type germ cell tumor.


Posteroanterior chest radiograph and nonenhanced ...

Posteroanterior chest radiograph and nonenhanced CT scans obtained through the mediastinum in 18-year-old man shows a large tumor involving the anterior, middle, and posterior mediastinum. Note the left pleural effusion. Biopsy confirmed a malignant teratoma.

Posteroanterior chest radiograph and nonenhanced ...

Posteroanterior chest radiograph and nonenhanced CT scans obtained through the mediastinum in 18-year-old man shows a large tumor involving the anterior, middle, and posterior mediastinum. Note the left pleural effusion. Biopsy confirmed a malignant teratoma.


Benign anterior mediastinal masses are typically depicted on CT as well-marginated, lobulated, encapsulated, mixed solid and cystic masses. The lesions typically extend to 1 side of the midline. In 13% of patients with an anterior mediastinal mass, the tumor extends into the middle and posterior mediastinal compartments. Cystic areas that are often multilocular and thinly septate are found in up to 88% of cases (see Images above and Images 4, 11-12, 16 in Multimedia).

Tumors are predominantly cystic in 80% of cases. About 50-73% of benign tumors have fat content, and 25-50% tumors are calcified. A fat-fluid layer may be found in up to 11% of patients; pleural effusion may be found in up to 17% of cases; and pericardial effusion may be found in 5%.

CT may useful in differentiating ruptured from unruptured mediastinal teratomas. Severe symptoms (chest pain or hemoptysis) are more common in patients with ruptured tumors (71%) than in patients with unruptured tumors. With ruptured mediastinal teratomas, the internal components are generally inhomogeneous, whereas with unruptured tumors, each internal compartment of the mass shows homogeneous attenuation. Other CT findings in ruptured tumors include fat-containing masses in adjacent lung parenchyma, consolidation or atelectasis in the adjacent lung, pericardial effusion, and pleural effusions.

Mature teratomas of the mediastinum typically appear on CT as heterogeneous anterior mediastinal masses containing areas of soft tissue, fluid, fat, or calcium attenuation, or any combination of these. Fluid-containing cystic areas, fat, and calcification occur frequently. Cystic lesions without fat or calcium are seen in 15% of tumors. Fat-fluid levels, considered highly specific for the diagnosis of mediastinal mature teratoma, are uncommon. CT is the imaging technique of choice in the evaluation of these lesions.

Malignant lesions are ill defined and have irregular borders, which infiltrate the mediastinal fat.21,22

Degree of Confidence

CT is the imaging modality of choice in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. CT is an excellent modality for determining the exact location of the mediastinal tumor, as well as its relationship to adjacent structures. It also is useful in differentiating masses that originate in the mediastinum from those that encroach upon the mediastinum from the lung or other structures. CT scans may help in differentiating various tissue attenuations, and they are highly accurate in differentiating fluid, fat, calcification, and cysts from solid tumors. CT may be used to assess the degree of vascularity of mediastinal tumors.

CT scanning is better than other cross-sectional imaging studies in revealing evidence of local invasion of adjacent structures by a mass or the presence of intrathoracic metastases. Fat-fluid levels are considered highly specific for the diagnosis of mediastinal mature teratoma, but they are uncommon.

False Positives/Negatives

Although CT is highly sensitive in the diagnosis of anterior mediastinal masses, its specificity is low with regard to differentiating benign from malignant lesions and in classifying malignant lesions of various histologic types.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

Continuing developments in MRI have resulted in improved image quality and decreased acquisition times. MRI is largely used as an adjunct to CT scanning in the evaluation of mediastinal tumors. In this setting, MRI provides additional information about the nature, location, and extent of disease.

MRI reveals masses of heterogeneous signal intensity, and it is more sensitive than CT in depicting infiltration of the adjacent structures by fat plane obliteration. It is performed as an ancillary study.

CT is more accurate than MRI in detecting mediastinal tumors, but MRI appears to be better than CT for evaluating spread through the capsule of the tumor, as well as infiltration of adjacent areas of mediastinal fat.

MRI is an accurate, noninvasive technique in the evaluation of superior vena cava syndrome and/or mediastinal and thoracic-inlet venous obstruction caused by mediastinal tumors.23

Degree of Confidence

The fact that MRI does not require ionizing radiation, as well as its multiplanar capability, makes MRI an excellent modality for both the initial diagnosis of a mediastinal mass and for follow-up evaluation after treatment. The vascular images provided are superior to CT scans and can better delineate the relationship of an identified mediastinal mass to adjacent intrathoracic vascular structures. MRI may be used to differentiate between a suspected mediastinal mass and a vascular abnormality, such as an aortic aneurysm.

MRI contrast agents may be used when iodinated contrast material is contraindicated. MRI provides increased detail of the subcarinal and aortopulmonary window areas, as well as of the inferior aspects of the mediastinum at the level of the diaphragm. MRI is preferred to CT scanning in the evaluation of invasion or extension of tumors, especially tumors closely associated with the heart. In addition, MRI is superior to CT for defining masses impinging upon the thoracic inlet or occurring at the thoracoabdominal level.

False Positives/Negatives

As with other cross-sectional imaging modalitites, MRI is nonspecific with regard to tissue diagnosis of anterior mediastinal masses.

Ultrasonography

Findings


Mediastinal sonogram obtained through the right p...

Mediastinal sonogram obtained through the right parasternal area of an anterior intercostal space shows a mass of uniform echogenicity with posterior acoustic enhancement in the same patient as in Images 5-6 in Multimedia.

Mediastinal sonogram obtained through the right p...

Mediastinal sonogram obtained through the right parasternal area of an anterior intercostal space shows a mass of uniform echogenicity with posterior acoustic enhancement in the same patient as in Images 5-6 in Multimedia.


Mediastinal sonogram obtained through the suprast...

Mediastinal sonogram obtained through the suprasternal notch in the same patient as in Image 11 shows an ill-defined tumor with a heterogeneous echo pattern. At surgery, a teratodermoid was diagnosed. The mass contained small foci of calcification.

Mediastinal sonogram obtained through the suprast...

Mediastinal sonogram obtained through the suprasternal notch in the same patient as in Image 11 shows an ill-defined tumor with a heterogeneous echo pattern. At surgery, a teratodermoid was diagnosed. The mass contained small foci of calcification.


Patient with asymmetrically placed anterior media...

Patient with asymmetrically placed anterior mediastinal mass. Lateral linear tomogram shows a well-defined, uniformly attenuating mass (not shown), sonogram shows a mass with smooth, uniform echotexture. The patient had not undergone surgery, and findings on follow-up over several years showed little change.

Patient with asymmetrically placed anterior media...

Patient with asymmetrically placed anterior mediastinal mass. Lateral linear tomogram shows a well-defined, uniformly attenuating mass (not shown), sonogram shows a mass with smooth, uniform echotexture. The patient had not undergone surgery, and findings on follow-up over several years showed little change.


Ultrasonography has traditionally been used to differentiate solid from cystic masses in places other than the mediastinum; its role has been extended, and it is now used to differentiate such masses in the anterior mediastinum. Sonograms may assist in determining a connection between a mass and adjacent structures. These studies are more useful in the evaluation of masses associated with the heart, as well as in vascular abnormalities (see Images above and Images 7, 9 in Multimedia).

In general, given the accuracy and detail provided by CT scanning, MRI, and selected radionuclide scans, sonographic techniques are generally not used as primary tools in the evaluation of mediastinal tumors and cysts.24

Degree of Confidence

In addition to determining the size and topographic characteristics of mediastinal masses, sonography precisely depicts the internal structure of the tumor; sonographic findings may suggest a specific diagnosis when considered in light of the clinical presentation and the location of the tumor.

False Positives/Negatives

Ultrasonography remains operator dependent, and the anterior mediastinum may not be accessible because of the thoracic bony cage. As with other cross-sectional imaging modalities, tissue diagnosis may not be possible because the differential diagnosis of solid, cystic, and complex mediastinal masses is extensive.

Nuclear Imaging

Findings

Radioiodine scans are particularly useful in identifying anterior mediastinal masses at the level of the thoracic inlet, such as the substernal extension of cervical thyroid goiter. Because germ cell tumors and thyroid abnormalities may both appear as anterior mediastinal masses, radioiodine scans may help to confirm or eliminate the involvement of thyroid tissue.

Indium-111 octreotide and pentetreotide scans may help in differentiating germ cell tumors from mediastinal carcinoids. Like other neuroendocrine tumors, carcinoids have somatostatin receptors and can therefore be imaged with somatostatin analogues (octreotide, pentetreotide) tagged to an appropriate radioisotope. Single-photon emission CT (SPECT) and subtraction techniques improve detection.

Sarcoid anterior mediastinal lymphadenopathy may be differentiated from GCT by use of radionuclide scanning. Gallium-67–avid sarcoid disease has been reported in more than 90% of cases of pulmonary involvement.

Positron-emission tomography (PET) has been studied extensively for use in the evaluation of a number of neoplasms, such as lung cancers, colorectal cancers, breast cancers, lymphomas, and melanomas. Its use in the evaluation of mediastinal tumors is under investigation.

Degree of Confidence

Through advances in physiologic imaging of mediastinal lymph nodes with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging, this modality now provides better diagnostic accuracy than that obtained with anatomic CT scanning or MRI.

At present, an imaging strategy that uses both FDG-PET and CT scanning appears to be the most accurate, noninvasive, and cost-effective means of assessing nodal status in patients with non – small cell lung cancer. The use of FDG-PET in the imaging and staging of germ cell tumors has not yet been investigated.25,26

False Positives/Negatives

The uptake of technetium-99m pertechnetate and radioiodine is not specific for thyroid tissue, and uptake may occur in ectopic gastric mucosa in duplication cysts and Barrett's esophagus. Gallium-67 uptake may occur in neoplastic, inflammatory, and infective foci. The results of FDG-PET are also nonspecific, and findings must be correlated with clinical presentation and other imaging findings.

Angiography

Findings

Conventional angiography has been used to differentiate mediastinal masses from vascular abnormalities and to demonstrate the relationship between known masses and adjacent vascular structures. MRI and magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) appear to satisfactorily define masses in this area.

Degree of Confidence

Angiography is invasive, but it is still regarded as the criterion standard in imaging the heart and major blood vessels. However, MRA and CT angiography are increasingly being used in these roles.

False Positives/Negatives

False-negative results may occur in cases involving aneurysms that are associated with laminar intraluminal thrombus. The sensitivity and specificity of angiography in the diagnosis of aortic aneurysms are 85% and 95%, respectively.

More on Mediastinum, Germ Cell Tumors

Overview: Mediastinum, Germ Cell Tumors
Imaging: Mediastinum, Germ Cell Tumors
Follow-up: Mediastinum, Germ Cell Tumors
Multimedia: Mediastinum, Germ Cell Tumors
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Giron J, Fajadet P, Sans N, et al. Diagnostic approach to mediastinal masses. Eur J Radiol. Mar 1998;27(1):21-42. [Medline].

  2. Luketich JD, Ginsberg RJ. The current management of patients with mediastinal tumors. Adv Surg. 1996;30:311-32. [Medline].

  3. Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Templeton PA, Moran CA. From the archives of the AFIP. Mediastinal germ cell tumors: radiologic and pathologic correlation. Radiographics. Sep 1992;12(5):1013-30. [Medline].

  4. Shields TW. Overview of primary mediastinal tumors and cysts. In: Shields TW, et al, eds. General Thoracic Surgery. Vol 2. Philadelphia, PA: Lippencott, Williams & Wilkins;. 2000: 2105-9.

  5. Strollo DC, Rosado-de-Christenson ML. Tumors of the thymus. J Thorac Imaging. Jul 1999;14(3):152-71. [Medline].

  6. Strollo DC, Rosado de Christenson ML, Jett JR. Primary mediastinal tumors. Part 1: tumors of the anterior mediastinum. Chest. Aug 1997;112(2):511-22. [Medline][Full Text].

  7. Takeda S, Miyoshi S, Ohta M, et al. Primary germ cell tumors in the mediastinum: a 50-year experience at asingle Japanese institution. Cancer. Jan 15 2003;97(2):367-76. [Medline].

  8. Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Naunheim KS. Follow-up of patients with thoracic malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 1999;8(2):355-69. [Medline].

  9. Weidner N. Germ-cell tumors of the mediastinum. Semin Diagn Pathol. Feb 1999;16(1):42-50. [Medline].

  10. Whooley BP, Urschel JD, Antkowiak JG, Takita H. Primary tumors of the mediastinum. J Surg Oncol. Feb 1999;70(2):95-9. [Medline].

  11. Chhieng DC, Lin O, Moran CA, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonteratomatous germ cell tumors of themediastinum. Am J Clin Pathol. Sep 2002;118(3):418-24. [Medline].

  12. Das DK, Pant CS, Rath B, et al. Fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of intra-thoracic and intra-abdominallesions: review of experience in the pediatric age group. Diagn Cytopathol. Aug 1993;9(4):383-93. [Medline].

  13. Shabb NS, Fahl M, Shabb B, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of the mediastinum: a clinical, radiologic, cytologic, and histologic study of 42 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. Dec 1998;19(6):428-36. [Medline].

  14. Singh HK, Silverman JF, Powers CN, et al. Diagnostic pitfalls in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the mediastinum. Diagn Cytopathol. Aug 1997;17(2):121-6. [Medline].

  15. Yang GC, Hwang SJ, Yee HT. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of unusual germ cell tumors of the mediastinum: atypical seminoma and parietal yolk sac tumor. Diagn Cytopathol. Aug 2002;27(2):69-74. [Medline].

  16. Geibel A, Kasper W, Keck A, et al. Diagnosis, localization and evaluation of malignancy of heart and mediastinal tumors by conventional and transesophageal echocardiography. Acta Cardiol. 1996;51(5):395-408. [Medline].

  17. Jeung MY, Gasser B, Gangi A, et al. Imaging of cystic masses of the mediastinum. Radiographics. Oct 2002;22 Spec No:S79-93. [Medline].

  18. Mathews VP, Broome DR, Smith RR, et al. Neuroimaging of disseminated germ cell neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 1990;154(6):1299-304. [Medline].

  19. Moeller KH, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Templeton PA. Mediastinal mature teratoma: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 1997;169(4):985-90. [Medline].

  20. Takao H, Shimizu S, Doi I, Watanabe T. Primary malignant melanoma of the anterior mediastinum: CT and MR findings. Clin Imaging. Jan-Feb 2008;32(1):58-60. [Medline].

  21. Boiselle PM. MR imaging of thoracic lymph nodes. A comparison of computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. Feb 2000;8(1):33-41. [Medline].

  22. Choi SJ, Lee JS, Song KS, Lim TH. Mediastinal teratoma: CT differentiation of ruptured and unrupturedtumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 1998;171(3):591-4. [Medline].

  23. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Donnelly LF, Spritzer CE. MR imaging of mediastinal masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. Feb 2000;8(1):59-89. [Medline].

  24. Serna DL, Aryan HE, Chang KJ, et al. An early comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needleaspiration and mediastinoscopy for diagnosis of mediastinal malignancy. Am Surg. Oct 1998;64(10):1014-8. [Medline].

  25. Bachmann J, Ernestus K, Werner T, Garnier Y, Mallmann P, Pietsch C. Detection of primary choriocarcinoma in the mediastinum by F-18 FDG positron emission tomography. Clin Nucl Med. Aug 2007;32(8):663-5. [Medline].

  26. Rubello D, Rampin L, Nanni C, Banti E, Ferdeghini M, Fanti S, et al. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic deposits of recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma: a prospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol. May 2008;34(5):581-6. [Medline].

  27. Rieger R, Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Wayand W. Videothoracoscopy for the management of mediastinal mass lesions. Surg Endosc. Jul 1996;10(7):715-7. [Medline].

  28. Bacha EA, Chapelier AR, Macchiarini P, et al. Surgery for invasive primary mediastinal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. Jul 1998;66(1):234-9. [Medline].

  29. Kaga K, Nishiumi N, Iwasaki M, Inoue H. Thoracoscopic diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal masses. Usefulness of the Two Windows Method. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). Feb 1999;40(1):157-60. [Medline].

  30. Lanciego C, Chacon JL, Julian A, et al. Stenting as first option for endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 2001;177(3):585-93. [Medline].

  31. Stremmel C, Passlick B. [Surgery of mediastinal tumors.]. Chirurg. Jan 2008;79(1):9-17. [Medline].

  32. Coskun U, Gunel N, Yildirim Y, et al. Primary mediastinal yolk sac tumor in a 66-year-old woman. Med Princ Pract. Oct-Dec 2002;11(4):218-20. [Medline].

  33. De Backer A, Madern GC, Pieters R, Haentjens P, Hakvoort-Cammel FG, Oosterhuis JW, et al. Influence of tumor site and histology on long-term survival in 193 children with extracranial germ cell tumors. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Feb 2008;18(1):1-6. [Medline].

  34. Hsu YJ, Pai L, Chen YC, et al. Extragonadal germ cell tumors in Taiwan: an analysis of treatment resultsof 59 patients. Cancer. Aug 15 2002;95(4):766-74. [Medline].

  35. Kesler KA, Brooks JA, Rieger KM, et al. Mediastinal metastases from testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: patterns of dissemination and predictors of long-term survival with surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Apr 2003;125(4):913-23. [Medline].

  36. Leshnower BG, Morris RJ, Pechet TT. Management of an anterior mediastinal pheochromocytoma causing tracheomalacia. Ann Thorac Surg. Dec 2007;84(6):2088-90. [Medline].

  37. Malagón HD, Valdez AM, Moran CA, Suster S. Germ cell tumors with sarcomatous components: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 46 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. Sep 2007;31(9):1356-62. [Medline].

  38. Mukai S, Yao H, Yamamura M, et al. [Thymic carcinoma (mixed small cell undifferentiated squamous cell carcinoma); report of a case]. Kyobu Geka. Jun 2003;56(6):509-12. [Medline].

  39. Murakawa Y, Satake N, Kato S, et al. Alpha-FP normalization as a prognostic factor for mediastinal originembryonal carcinoma: report of five cases. Intern Med. Oct 2002;41(10):883-8. [Medline].

  40. Ozergin U, Gormus N, Aribas OK, et al. Benign mature cystic teratoma of the anterior mediastinum leading to heart failure: report of a case. Surg Today. 2003;33(7):518-20. [Medline].

  41. Protopapas Z, Westcott JL. Transthoracic hilar and mediastinal biopsy. J Thorac Imaging. Oct 1997;12(4):250-8. [Medline].

  42. Robertson SA, Nazir S, Bowker C, Lakhoo K. Superior mediastinal teratoma containing well-differentiated bowel. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. Mar-Apr 2007;26(2):69-73. [Medline].

  43. Shiota S, Nakaya Y, Sakamoto K, et al. Spontaneous hemothorax secondary to immature teratoma of the mediastinum. Intern Med. Sep 1999;38(9):726-8. [Medline].

  44. Sinclair DS, Bolen MA, King MA. Mature teratoma within the posterior mediastinum. J Thorac Imaging. Jan 2003;18(1):53-5. [Medline].

  45. Yokoi K, Tanaka N, Furukawa K, Ishikawa N, Seya T, Horiba K, et al. Male choriocarcinoma with metastasis to the jejunum: a case report and review of the literature. J Nippon Med Sch. Apr 2008;75(2):116-21. [Medline].

Further Reading

Related eMedicine topics

Germ Cell Tumors

Mediastinal Cysts

Mediastinal Seminoma

Keywords

germ cell tumors, germ cell neoplasm, mediastinal germ cell tumor, GCTs, Klinefelter syndrome, teratoma, seminoma, epidermoid cyst, dermoids, dermoid cyst, mediastinal dermoid

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, Consultant Radiologist, North Manchester General Hospital, The Pennine Acute NHS Trust, Manchester UK
Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of the United States, Royal College of Radiologists, and Royal College of Surgeons of England
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Klaus L Irion, MD, PhD, Consulting Staff, The Cardiothoracic Centre Liverpool NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK
Klaus L Irion, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute
Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nigel Thomas, MBBS, Vice-Chair, Manchester (North) Research Ethics Committee; Honorary Lecturer, Visiting Professor, University of Salford, UK
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Kitt Shaffer, MD, PhD, Director of Undergraduate Medical Education, Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Cambridge Health Alliance
Kitt Shaffer, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

W Richard Webb, MD, Professor, Department of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Kavita Garg, MD, Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Kavita Garg, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Thoracic Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.