eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Gastrointestinal

Cholangiocarcinoma

Author: Mahesh Kumar Neelala Anand, MBBS, DNB, FRCR,, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
Coauthor(s): David Andrew Nicholson, MBBS, FRCR, Honorary Lecturer, Department of Radiology, University of Manchester; Consultant Gastrointestinal Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Hope Hospital, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Trust, UK
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 25, 2010

Introduction

Background

Cholangiocarcinoma is a slow-growing malignancy of the bile duct. It is the second most common primary hepatic tumor after hepatoma. The cause of bile duct cancer is unclear. Results of some epidemiologic studies have implicated bacteria-induced carcinogens derived from bile salts (eg, lithocholate) as a causative factor in the pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinomas. Biliary ductal calculi occur in 20-50% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma; however, the association of gallstones with cholangiocarcinoma is less marked than it is with carcinoma of the gallbladder. The most common cause of malignant biliary obstruction is pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gallbladder carcinoma is 9 times more common than bile duct malignancy.

High-risk groups for cholangiocarcinomas include patients with the following:

  • Parasitic diseases of the biliary tract with either Clonorchis sinensis or Opisthorchis viverrini infestation (C sinensis infestation is the most common cause worldwide.)
  • Congenital choledochal cysts
  • Inflammatory bowel disease (The risk increases 10 times. The incidence of cholangiocarcinomas in patients with ulcerative colitis is 0.4-1.4%, with a latent period of 15 y.)
  • Primary sclerosing cholangitis (10% of cases)
  • History of other malignancy (10% of cases)
  • Previous surgery for choledochal cyst or biliary atresia
  • Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency
  • Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
  • Gallstones (20-50% of cases, probably coincidental)
  • Papillomatosis of the bile ducts
  • Thorotrast exposure
  • Chronic typhoid carrier status

Recent studies

According to Singal et al, the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma is rising and accurate predictors of survival at diagnosis are not well defined. The authors therefore reviewed the records of 136 patients with cholangiocarcinoma (79 intrahepatic and 57 extrahepatic) to help clarify the clinical presentation and prognostic factors in these patients. In their study, the median survival was 27.3-25.8 months for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 30.3 months for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Independent predictors of mortality at presentation were elevated bilirubin level, CA 19-9 levels greater than 100 U/mL, and the stage of disease. Surgical therapy was associated with improved survival for both tumors, but survival was generally poor, with no significant difference in outcomes between intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.1

Guglielmi et al evaluated the surgical outcomes of 95 patients with intrahepatic (33 patients) and extrahepatic (62 patients) cholangiocarcinoma and found that overall median survival was 24 months, with a 3-year survival rate of 45% and a 5-year survival rate of 23%. Prognostic factors for survival were macroscopic types of the tumor, the resection of extrahepatic bile duct, radical resection, lymph node metastases, and macrovascular invasion. The 5-year survival rate for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was 26% and for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 13%. Patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had a higher frequency of negative clinicopathologic factors, such as nonradical resection, perineural infiltration, and macrovascular invasion.2

Pathophysiology

Origin

Most of the tumors are adenocarcinomas originating from the biliary epithelium. The tumors can be nodular or diffuse (sclerosing scirrhous tumor). All cholangiocarcinomas grow slowly, infiltrate locally, and metastasize late in the course of the disease.

Classification

The tumors are classified as extrahepatic tumors (87-92%) or intrahepatic tumors (8-13%).3

Extrahepatic tumors are divided into proximal, middle, and distal ductal tumors. Tumors located at the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts with the proximal common hepatic duct are called Klatskin tumors.

Intrahepatic tumors arise from the small ducts and are often diffuse and multicentric; satellite nodules occur in about 65% of patients. Solitary well-demarcated tumors are difficult to differentiate from primary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). The diffuse sclerosing or scirrhous types are densely fibrotic and have annular long strictures. Compared with other tumors, they are less cellular and have relatively few well-differentiated carcinoma cells in a dense connective tissue stroma. They are generally confined to the proximal ducts. The nodular variety is also called the papillary type. The tumors are nodular on the intraluminal and extraluminal surfaces, and they form irregular strictures. They are most common in the distal duct and in the periampullary region. The papillary tumors are friable and vascular and tend to bleed easily, causing hemobilia.

Intrahepatic tumors have a special predilection for perineural spread. Hematogenous spread to the liver, peritoneum, or lung is extremely rare. Lymphatic spread is common and occurs in the cystic and common bile duct (CBD) nodes in about 32% of extrahepatic tumors and 15% of intrahepatic tumors. Extrahepatic tumors also spread to the celiac nodes in about 16% of cases and to the peripancreatic and superior mesenteric nodes. Infiltration of adjacent liver occurs in 23% of cases, and peritoneal seeding occurs in 9%.

Frequency

United States

Primary cancers of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts account for only 1.5% of all cancers in the United States. Five-year survival rates are low in the United States, usually less than 10%. About 20% of liver cancers involve cholangiocarcinoma arising from the intrahepatic branches of the ductal system.

International

Cholangiocarcinoma is associated with C sinensis infestation, which is by far the most common cause worldwide. The prevalence of biliary tract and gallbladder cancer in England and Wales is 2.8 cases per 100,000 in females and 2.0 cases per 100,000 in males.

Mortality/Morbidity

Less than 20% of intrahepatic tumors are resectable. Distal and periampullary extrahepatic tumors are resectable, with a 5-year survival rate of 39%. The reported 5-year survival rate in patients with resected proximal tumors is 5-15%.

  • Most patients die within a year of diagnosis.
  • Recurrence of cholangiocarcinoma after liver transplantation is common.

Race

No specific race-related increase in prevalence exists, although the incidence in the Far Eastern countries is increased. This difference is related to dietary habits, notably the consumption of improperly cooked seafood contaminated with parasites.

Sex

In contrast to gallbladder carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma has a male preponderance, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:2.

Age

The patient's age at presentation may vary, but the incidence peaks in those in the 50s.

  • Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma occurs in those aged 50-60 years.
  • Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma occurs in those aged 60-70 years.

Anatomy

The right and left hepatic ducts merge to form the common hepatic duct. The right and left hepatic ducts drain bile from their respective lobes of liver. The cystic duct insertion point marks the end of the common hepatic duct. The duct below the level of the cystic duct is referred to as CBD. The vaterian segment includes the distal 2.5-3.0 cm of the CBD, along with the distal part of the pancreatic duct and the ampulla.

Tumor involves only the left or right hepatic duct in 8-13% of cases, whereas tumor involves the confluence of the ducts (Klatskin tumor) in 10-26%. Tumor involves the common hepatic duct in 14-37% of cases. Cholangiocarcinoma involves the proximal CBD in 15-30% of cases and the distal CBD in 30-50%. Cystic duct cholangiocarcinoma occurs in 6% of cases.

Presentation

Intrahepatic tumors may cause abdominal pain, palpable masses, weight loss, and painless jaundice. Abdominal pain is the most common symptom; it is a feature in 47% of cases, whereas painless jaundice occurs in only 12%. Obstructive jaundice occurs in 90% of cholangiocarcinomas and is progressive with pruritus and anorexia. The duration of symptoms is usually short (ie, months). Some patients may have cholangitis or acute cholecystitis.

Patients may have chronic blood loss due to papillary tumors and resultant anemia. Physical examination reveals hepatomegaly, and a mass is palpable in about 18% of patients. The gallbladder may be palpable in patients with distal tumors.

Preferred Examination

The first-line investigation in a patient with jaundice or right upper quadrant pain is ultrasonography (US). Biliary ductal dilatation is easily demonstrated with US, but the tumor mass is seldom localized with it.4,5

CT may demonstrate the tumor if the malignancy is nodular and masslike, but tumors of the diffuse sclerosing variety are difficult to detect.

Compared with the other techniques, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a more definitive investigation that can depict the periampullary tumor. However, with the advent of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), easy demonstration of stricture-causing tumors is possible. The disadvantages of MRCP are its inability to distend the duct and the equivocal findings due to long segments and minimal narrowing in diffuse sclerosing tumors. Celiac-axis arteriography is required to assess the vascular supply and the potential for resectability.

MR angiography has shown some promising results, with a sensitivity similar to that of conventional angiography in demonstrating the mesenteric circulation.

The role of endoscopic and intraductal US in the management of these tumors is yet to be defined. Furthermore, determination of the preferred examination is complex in the presence of a predisposing condition such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Recent findings have demonstrated the potential role of positron emission tomography (PET), which improves the depiction of cholangiocarcinoma superimposed on PSC.

Differential Diagnoses

Biliary Tract, Percutaneous Intervention
Hepatic Adenoma
Cavernous Hemangioma, Liver
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Cholangitis, Primary Sclerosing
Cholangitis, Recurrent Pyogenic
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

Other Problems to Be Considered

Infections involving the bile ducts (eg, tuberculosis) are rare, but they may cause strictures with portal lymphadenopathy that simulates findings in cholangiocarcinoma.

More on Cholangiocarcinoma

Overview: Cholangiocarcinoma
Imaging: Cholangiocarcinoma
Follow-up: Cholangiocarcinoma
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Singal AG, Rakoski MO, Salgia R, Pelletier S, Welling TH, Fontana RJ, et al. The clinical presentation and prognostic factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a tertiary care centre. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Mar 2010;31(6):625-33. [Medline].

  2. Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, Pachera S, Valdegamberi A, Capelli P, et al. Does intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have better prognosis compared to perihilar cholangiocarcinoma?. J Surg Oncol. Feb 1 2010;101(2):111-5. [Medline].

  3. Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. Feb 22 2010;[Medline].

  4. Gakhal MS, Gheyi VK, Brock RE, Andrews GS. Multimodality imaging of biliary malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 2009;18(2):225-39. [Medline].

  5. Ariff B, Lloyd CR, Khan S, Shariff M, Thillainayagam AV, Bansi DS, et al. Imaging of liver cancer. World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21 2009;15(11):1289-300. [Medline].

  6. Senda Y, Nishio H, Oda K, Yokoyama Y, Ebata T, Igami T, et al. Value of Multidetector Row CT in the Assessment of Longitudinal Extension of Cholangiocarcinoma-Correlation Between MDCT and Microscopic Findings. World J Surg. Apr 19 2009;[Medline].

  7. Keiding S, Hansen SB, Rasmussen HH. Detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis by positron emission tomography. Hepatology. Sep 1998;28(3):700-6. [Medline].

  8. Singal A, Welling TH, Marrero JA. Role of liver transplantation in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. Apr 2009;9(4):491-502. [Medline].

  9. Rea DJ, Rosen CB, Nagorney DM, Heimbach JK, Gores GJ. Transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma: when and for whom?. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 2009;18(2):325-37. [Medline].

  10. Speer AG, Cotton PB, Russell RC. Randomised trial of endoscopic versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice. Lancet. Jul 11 1987;2(8550):57-62.

  11. Bloom CM, Langer B, Wilson SR. Role of US in the detection, characterization, and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 1999;19(5):1199-218. [Medline].

  12. Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet. Dec 19-26 1992;340(8834-8835):1488-92. [Medline].

  13. Dick BW, Gordon RL, LaBerge JM. Percutaneous transhepatic placement of biliary endoprostheses: results in 100 consecutive patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. Nov 1990;1(1):97-100. [Medline].

  14. Ferrucci JT. MRI and MRCP in pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Ann Oncol. 1999;10 Suppl 4:18-9. [Medline].

  15. Gordon RL, Ring EJ, LaBerge JM. Malignant biliary obstruction: treatment with expandable metallic stents--follow-up of 50 consecutive patients. Radiology. Mar 1992;182(3):697-701. [Medline].

  16. Herbener T, Zajko AB, Koneru B. Recurrent cholangiocarcinoma in the biliary tree after liver transplantation. Radiology. Dec 1988;169(3):641-2. [Medline].

  17. Loyer EM, Chin H, DuBrow RA. Hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: enhancement patterns with quadruple phase helical CT--a comparative study. Radiology. Sep 1999;212(3):866-75. [Medline].

  18. Miller BA, Kolonel LN, Bernstein L, et al. Racial/Ethnic Patterns of Cancer in the United States 1988-1992. NIH publications 96-4104. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute;1996.

  19. Shapiro MJ. Management of malignant biliary obstruction: nonoperative and palliative techniques. Oncology (Huntingt). Jun 1995;9(6):493-6, 499; discussion 499-500, 503. [Medline].

  20. Smits NJ, Reeders JW. Imaging and staging of biliopancreatic malignancy: role of ultrasound. Ann Oncol. 1999;10 Suppl 4:20-4. [Medline].

  21. Tamada K, Tomiyama T, Ohashi A. Preoperative assessment of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma using three- dimensional intraductal US. Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 1999;50(4):548-54. [Medline].

  22. Vilgrain V, Van Beers BE, Flejou JF. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: MRI and pathologic correlation in 14 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Jan-Feb 1997;21(1):59-65. [Medline].

Keywords

cholangiocarcinoma, malignant bile duct tumors, biliary malignancy, primary hepatic tumors, bile duct cancer, intrahepatic tumors, extrahepatic tumors, Klatskin tumors, liver cancer, Clonorchis sinensis, C sinensis, Opisthorchis viverrini, Opisthorchis viverrini

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Mahesh Kumar Neelala Anand, MBBS, DNB, FRCR,, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
Mahesh Kumar Neelala Anand, MBBS, DNB, FRCR, is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, British Society of Gastroenterology, British Society of Interventional Radiology, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, Indian Radiology and Imaging Association, Radiological Society of North America, and Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

David Andrew Nicholson, MBBS, FRCR, Honorary Lecturer, Department of Radiology, University of Manchester; Consultant Gastrointestinal Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Hope Hospital, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Trust, UK
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Zahir Amin, MD, MBBS, MRCP, FRCR, Consulting Staff, Department of Imaging, University College Hospital, UK
Zahir Amin, MD, MBBS, MRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Institute of Radiology, British Medical Association, and Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Paul M Silverman, MD, Professor, Chief of Body Imaging, Chair in Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Paul M Silverman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Karani, MBBS, FRCR, Clinical Director of Radiology and Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London
John Karani, MBBS, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Institute of Radiology, British Society of Interventional Radiology, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, European Society of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.