eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Gastrointestinal

Colitis, Pseudomembranous: Imaging

Author: Vinay K Gheyi, MD, MBBS, Chief of Radiology, Department of Radiology, McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Coauthor(s): John S Wills, MD, Associate Professor of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University; Chair, Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania Hospital; Raul N Uppot, MD, Instructor in Radiology, Harvard Medical School;, Assistant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Sep 19, 2007

Radiography

Findings

Plain films of the abdomen are notoriously insensitive for diagnosis of PMC. The findings may range from normal to nonspecific, but as plain films are often the first studies to be ordered, it is important to be aware of these findings. Classic findings consist of the following:

  1. Colonic dilatation — Findings range from colonic ileus to toxic megacolon and even perforation with pneumoperitoneum. Toxic megacolon is suggested by acute dilatation of transverse colon to a diameter greater than 6 cm associated with systemic toxicity and the absence of mechanical obstruction.
  2. Nodular haustral thickening (see Image 3) — This is considered to be fairly specific for PMC but is observed only in severe cases.1 Any part of the colon may be involved. In a study by Boland et al, the transverse colon was most commonly involved, followed by the left colon and then the right colon.5  
  3. Thumb printing — This is nonspecific, since it can be observed with either inflammatory or ischemic colitis.

Barium enema

Contrast enemas should be avoided in patients with possible PMC because of potential risk for perforation. Barium enemas are rarely indicated, especially with the advent of cross-sectional imaging.

Barium enema findings may vary, depending on the severity of the disease. In the milder forms, nodular filling defects involving the mucosa may be observed that coalesce as the disease progresses, giving an irregular appearance to the bowel wall (see Image 4). The serrated outline of the colon does not result from mucosal ulceration but, rather, is a consequence of trapped barium between the plaquelike membranes.

Degree of Confidence

Plain radiographic abnormalities may be observed in only 32% of cases of PMC.5

False Positives/Negatives

Plain film findings may suggest a diagnosis of PMC but usually are insensitive. Even if the radiographs demonstrate abnormalities, they tend to underestimate the extent and severity of the disease.4

Computed Tomography

Findings

With increased use of CT as a primary imaging modality in the evaluation of patients with diffuse abdominal pain or fever, it is critical for radiologists to recognize CT features of PMC.1 CT findings, although not specific, may be highly suggestive of PMC, and CT is excellent for evaluation of the extent of PMC (Ros, 1996).1

The following are CT findings in PMC:

  1. Marked colonic wall thickening (see Image 5). Colonic wall thickening is the most common CT finding in patients with PMC and ranges from 3-32 mm.4 Most cases reveal total colonic involvement; however, focal and segmental involvement has been well documented. Mural thickening can be smooth or irregular and eccentric or concentric. PMC more often causes irregular and shaggy wall thickening rather than the smooth and homogeneous thickening observed with Crohn disease.4
  2. Target sign — On contrast-enhanced CT, mucosal hyperemia leads to enhancement with relatively hypodense submucosa secondary to edematous changes. This gives the appearance of a bull's eye or target sign. The sign is better appreciated on the arterial phase of enhancement. It is a nonspecific sign and has been reported with other forms of colitis such as Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.
  3. Accordion sign — This is highly suggestive of PMC but is only observed in advanced disease. The cause of this sign is entrapment of orally administered barium in between thick and edematous haustral folds, giving alternating low- and high-density bands (see Image 6).
  4. Pericolonic stranding — If observed, this is usually mild, reflecting mucosal rather than serosal involvement. The typical CT appearance of PMC is mild pericolonic stranding disproportionate to marked colonic wall thickening.
  5. Ascites — This is a nonspecific finding and tends to occur in severe cases of PMC. Ascites is observed on CT in an average of 35% of patients.1
  6. Other findings — Pneumatosis, toxic megacolon, and portal venous gas may be observed. These features are nonspecific and may be observed with severe colitis of any cause.

Degree of Confidence

The sensitivity of detection of PMC on CT is approximately 85%. Specificity of CT is low (approximately 48%), since other types of colitis can cause a similar appearance.6

Ultrasonography

Findings

Ultrasound is not commonly used for evaluation of possible PMC; however, it may be helpful in evaluation of postoperative patients in surgical intensive care units who are on antibiotics and develop nonspecific abdominal symptoms.1 Thickened colon may be discovered incidentally during ultrasound examination of the abdomen.

Ultrasound findings rely on wall thickening of the colon, as well as the target sign, demonstrated by hyperechoic mucosa in the background of hypoechoic edematous submucosa. Ascites may be an associated finding and has been observed in as many as 77% of cases.7

More on Colitis, Pseudomembranous

Overview: Colitis, Pseudomembranous
Imaging: Colitis, Pseudomembranous
Multimedia: Colitis, Pseudomembranous
References

References

  1. Ros PR, Buetow PC, Pantograg-Brown L, et al. Pseudomembranous colitis. Radiology. Jan 1996;198(1):1-9. [Medline].

  2. Kelly CP, Pothoulakis C, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile colitis. N Engl J Med. Jan 27 1994;330(4):257-62. [Medline].

  3. Thielman NM. Pseudomembranous colitis. In: Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. 2000:1111-1126.

  4. Kawamoto S, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Pseudomembranous colitis: spectrum of imaging findings with clinical and pathologic correlation. Radiographics. Jul-Aug 1999;19(4):887-97. [Medline].

  5. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Cats A, Mueller PR. Pseudomembranous colitis: diagnostic sensitivity of the abdominal plain radiograph. Clin Radiol. Jul 1994;49(7):473-5. [Medline].

  6. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Cats AM, et al. Antibiotic-induced diarrhea: specificity of abdominal CT for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease. Radiology. Apr 1994;191(1):103-6. [Medline].

  7. Downey DB, Wilson SR. Pseudomembranous colitis: sonographic features. Radiology. Jul 1991;180(1):61-4. [Medline].

  8. Brook I. Pseudomembranous colitis in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Feb 2005;20(2):182-6. [Medline].

  9. Jung SW, Jeon SW, Do BH, Kim SG, Ha SS, Cho CM. Clinical aspects of rifampicin-associated pseudomembranous colitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. Jan 2007;41(1):38-40. [Medline].

  10. Ramachandran I, Sinha R, Rodgers P. Pseudomembranous colitis revisited: spectrum of imaging findings. Clin Radiol. Jul 2006;61(7):535-44. [Medline].

  11. Wolf PL, Kasyan A. Images in clinical medicine. Pseudomembranous colitis associated with Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. Dec 8 2005;353(23):2491. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

clostridium difficile disease, PMC

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Vinay K Gheyi, MD, MBBS, Chief of Radiology, Department of Radiology, McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

John S Wills, MD, Associate Professor of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University; Chair, Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania Hospital
John S Wills, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, Medical Society of Delaware, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Raul N Uppot, MD, Instructor in Radiology, Harvard Medical School;, Assistant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital
Raul N Uppot, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

John L Haddad, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Director of Body MRI, Department of Radiology, Methodist Hospital in Houston
John L Haddad, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Spencer B Gay, MD, Professor of Radiology, Director of Body Computed Tomography, Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Eugene C Lin, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.