eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Gastrointestinal

Gallbladder, Carcinoma

Author: Gregory M Szarnecki, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Columbia Regional Hospital, Columbia, MO
Coauthor(s): Ian G Karol, MD, Chief, Section of Body Imaging, Associate Program Director, Department of Radiology, Bridgeport Hospital Yale New Haven Health, Yale School of Medicine; Hanan Khalil, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Bridgeport Hospital Yale New Haven Health
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 29, 2007

Introduction

Background

Although uncommon, carcinoma of the gallbladder (GB) is the most common primary hepatobiliary carcinoma, is the fifth most common malignancy of the GI tract, and predominantly affects older persons with long-standing cholecystolithiasis. GB epithelial tumors tend to behave similarly to other GI adenocarcinomas. When the diagnosis is made incidentally at the time of cholecystectomy, surgical resection can be curative; however, more commonly, the tumor is unresectable and rarely diagnosed preoperatively despite patients' symptoms. Early diagnosis can improve the clinical outcome and cure rate of GB carcinoma.

Pathophysiology

The exact etiology of GB carcinoma is unknown; however, several associated factors have been identified. One hypothesis suggests that irritation of the GB mucosa by stones causes chronic inflammation and, followed by repetitive epithelial repair, may cause malignant transformation. Approximately 15 years is required for dysplasia to progress to invasive carcinoma.

Classification

  • Malignant epithelial tumors include adenocarcinoma (most common), squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma.
  • Malignant mesenchymal tumors include embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma.
  • Other malignant tumors include carcinosarcoma, carcinoid tumor, lymphoma, and melanoma.

Location: In affected patients, 60% of GB tumors occur in the fundus, 30% in the GB body, and 10% in the GB neck. 

Spread

  • Early lymphatic spread is to the retroperitoneal, right celiac, and pancreaticoduodenal nodes.
  • Direct invasion occurs in the liver, extrahepatic biliary ducts, and duodenum and colon (less common).
  • Intraperitoneal seeding may occur.

Staging: Several staging systems exist. A simplified version of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging (or tumor, node, metastasis [TNM] staging) is shown in Table 11 :

Table 1. AJCC Classification1

Open table in new window

Table
TNM DefinitionTumor Location
TisCarcinoma in situ
T1aGB wall: mucosa
T1bGB wall: muscle
T2Perimuscular connective tissue
T3Serosa or 1 organ, liver <2 cm
T42 or more organs, liver >2 cm
N1Hepatoduodenal ligament nodes
N2Other regional lymph nodes
M0No distant metastases
M1Distant metastases
TNM DefinitionTumor Location
TisCarcinoma in situ
T1aGB wall: mucosa
T1bGB wall: muscle
T2Perimuscular connective tissue
T3Serosa or 1 organ, liver <2 cm
T42 or more organs, liver >2 cm
N1Hepatoduodenal ligament nodes
N2Other regional lymph nodes
M0No distant metastases
M1Distant metastases

 
 Table 2. Staging of Cancer of the Gallbladder1

Open table in new window

Table
Stage 0TisN0M0
Stage IAT1N0M0
Stage IBT2N0M0
Stage IIAT3N0M0
Stage IIBT1-3N1M0
Stage IIIAT4NxM0
Stage IVATxNxM1
Stage 0TisN0M0
Stage IAT1N0M0
Stage IBT2N0M0
Stage IIAT3N0M0
Stage IIBT1-3N1M0
Stage IIIAT4NxM0
Stage IVATxNxM1


The modified Nevin-Moran staging system is more commonly used (see Table 3).

Table 3. Modified Nevin-Moran Staging2

Open table in new window

Table
StageTumor Location
IIn situ carcinoma
IIMucosa or muscularis involvement
IIITransmural direct liver invasion involved
IVALymph node metastasis
IVBLymph node metastasis and/or distant metastases involved
StageTumor Location
IIn situ carcinoma
IIMucosa or muscularis involvement
IIITransmural direct liver invasion involved
IVALymph node metastasis
IVBLymph node metastasis and/or distant metastases involved


Frequency

United States

In the general population, the reported incidence of GB carcinoma is 3 cases per 100,000 persons, with more than 6500 new patients diagnosed annually. This condition is found incidentally in 1-3% of cholecystectomy specimens and in 0.5-2.4% of postmortem examinations.

International

Worldwide, Chile and Bolivia have the highest prevalence of GB carcinoma. In Japan, there are 4.8 cases per 100,000 males and 5 cases per 100,000 females. In Israel, there are 7.5 cases per 100,000 males and 13.8 cases per 100,000 females. In Poland, the incidence rate is 4.8 cases per 100,000 males and 23.1 cases per 100,000 females. The disease is also seen in Northern Europe and South Africa.

Mortality/Morbidity

Patients with GB carcinoma have an overall mean survival rate of 6 months, and the 5-year survival rate is 5%.3

Race

In Native Americans, GB carcinoma is the most commonly seen gastrointestinal malignancy, with a reported incidence rate of 5.1 cases per 100,000 males and 8.7 cases per 100,000 females. This condition is also seen in Hispanic Americans and Latin Americans. In addition, GB carcinoma is twice as common in whites as in blacks.

Sex

GB carcinoma has a female preponderance. The female-to-male ratio is 3:1.

Age

The greatest incidence of GB carcinoma is in persons older than 65 years.

Presentation

Associated findings and risk factors for GB carcinoma are as follows:

  • Cholecystolithiasis, which is present in 70-90% of patients (duration may be a key factor in development of cancer)
  • Composition of the bile with cholesterol stones (most commonly implicated)
  • Genetic factors
  • Calcification of the GB wall (carcinoma in 25% of patients with "porcelain" GB)
  • Anomalous pancreatic-biliary duct junction
  • Congenital biliary cysts
  • Infections by Salmonella typhi
  • Environmental carcinogens

Presentation

The signs and symptoms of GB carcinoma are nonspecific.

  • Patients in Nevin-Moran stages I-III show signs and symptoms that mimic cholelithiasis and/or cholecystitis (see Pathophysiology, Table 3).
  • Patients in Nevin-Moran stage IV present with weight loss, hepatomegaly, and jaundice, which are considered poor prognostic signs (see Pathophysiology, Table 3).
  • Duodenal or colonic obstruction or cholecystoenteric fistula may signal GB carcinoma.

Treatment and prognosis

No established treatment protocol exists. Radical surgery with negative tumor margins is an accepted treatment for advanced disease. If there are negative tumor margins, 5-year survival rates are as follows, according to the AJCC2 :

  • Stage I: 29-50%
  • Stage II: 7-9%
  • Stage III: 3%
  • Stage IV: 2%

Clinical problems

In most patients, the diagnosis of GB carcinoma is made postoperatively and at an advanced stage of the disease because of the poorly defined GB muscularis that allows early spread into the perimuscular tissue and, frequently, beyond the GB to involve the liver and extrahepatic biliary ducts.

Preferred Examination

Ultrasound (US), which is readily available, noninvasive, and cost-effective, is the imaging modality of choice.

Limitations of Techniques

US cannot stage the tumor. The visualization of lymph nodes, intraperitoneal disease, and distant metastases is difficult.

Differential Diagnoses

Cholecystitis, Acute
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Liver, Metastases
Porcelain Gallbladder

Other Problems to Be Considered

Chronic cholecystitis
Carcinoma of the pancreatic head

More on Gallbladder, Carcinoma

Overview: Gallbladder, Carcinoma
Imaging: Gallbladder, Carcinoma
Multimedia: Gallbladder, Carcinoma
References

References

  1. National Cancer Institute. Treatment statement for health professionals: gallbladder cancer. Updated 2/15/07. Med News. Available at http://www.meb.uni-bonn.de/cancer.gov/CDR0000062904.html. Accessed August 23, 2007.

  2. Fong Y, Wagman L, Gonen M, et al. Evidence-based gallbladder cancer staging: changing cancer staging by analysis of data from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg. Jun 2006;243(6):767-71; discussion 771-4. [Medline][Full Text].

  3. Levy AD, Murakata LA, Rohrmann CA Jr. Gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. Mar-Apr 2001;21(2):295-314; questionnaire, 549-55. [Medline][Full Text].

  4. Douglass HO Jr, Kim SY, Merpol NJ. Neoplasms of the gallbladder. In: Holland JF, Frei E III, Best RC Jr, eds. Cancer Medicine. Vol 2. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1997:1955-63.

  5. Dudiak CM, Lawson TL. Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Diagnostic Ultrasound (Second Series) Test and Syllabus. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1994:324-62.

  6. Elsayes KM, Oliveira EP, Narra VR, El-Merhi FM, Brown JJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the gallbladder: spectrum of abnormalities. Acta Radiol. Jun 2007;48(5):476-82. [Medline].

  7. Grainger RG, Allison E. Grainger and Allison's Diagnostic Radiology: a Textbook of Medical Imaging. Vol 2. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1996:1224.

  8. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, eds. Gallbladder. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002:139-44.

  9. Haubrich WS, Schaffner F, Berk JE, eds. Bockus Gastroenterology. Vol 3. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1995:2739-44.

  10. Kai M, Chijiiwa K, Ohuchida J, et al. A curative resection improves the postoperative survival rate even in patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 2007;11(8):1025-32. [Medline].

  11. Kim MJ, Kim KW, Kim HC, et al. Unusual malignant tumors of the gallbladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 2006;187(2):473-80. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. Mekeel KL, Hemming AW. Surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma: a review. J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 2007;11(9):1188-93. [Medline].

  13. Memel DS, Balfe DM, Semelka RC. The biliary tract. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, eds. Computed Body Tomography With MRI Correlation. Vol 2. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:810-3.

  14. Miller G, Schwartz LH, D'Angelica M. The use of imaging in the diagnosis and staging of hepatobiliary malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 2007;16(2):343-68. [Medline].

  15. Numata K, Oka H, Morimoto M, et al. Differential diagnosis of gallbladder diseases with contrast-enhanced harmonic gray scale ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. Jun 2007;26(6):763-74. [Medline].

  16. Oe A, Kawabe J, Torii K, et al. Distinguishing benign from malignant gallbladder wall thickening using FDG-PET. Ann Nucl Med. Dec 2006;20(10):699-703. [Medline].

  17. Shih SP, Schulick RD, Cameron JL, et al. Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection. Ann Surg. Jun 2007;245(6):893-901. [Medline].

  18. Srivastava AK, Singh B, Gupta SL. Prevalence of Toxoplasma antibodies in sheep and goats in India. Trop Anim Health Prod. Nov 1983;15(4):207-8. [Medline].

  19. Vitetta L, Sali A, Little P, Mrazek L. Gallstones and gall bladder carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg. Sep 2000;70(9):667-73. [Medline].

  20. Yamada T, Alpers DH, Owyang C, Powell DW, Silverstein FE, eds. Textbook of Gastroenterology. Vol 2. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:2335-40.

Further Reading

Keywords

GB carcinoma, gallbladder cancer, hepatobiliary carcinoma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Gregory M Szarnecki, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Columbia Regional Hospital, Columbia, MO
Gregory M Szarnecki, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology and American Society of Neuroradiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ian G Karol, MD, Chief, Section of Body Imaging, Associate Program Director, Department of Radiology, Bridgeport Hospital Yale New Haven Health, Yale School of Medicine
Ian G Karol, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Hanan Khalil, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Bridgeport Hospital Yale New Haven Health
Hanan Khalil, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Abraham H Dachman, MD, FACR, Professor, Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago School of Medicine; Director of CT, Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago Hospitals
Abraham H Dachman, MD, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: EZ-EM, Inc. Consulting fee Consulting; iCAD, Inc. Consulting fee Consulting; Philips Medical Grant/research funds Other; iCAD, Inc. Grant/research funds Other; GE Healtcare, Inc. Honoraria Speaking and teaching

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Karani, MBBS, FRCR, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.