eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Gastrointestinal

Hepatic Adenoma

Author: Karen Kodsi Garfield, MD, Attending Physician in Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, St Luke's Hospital
Coauthor(s): Sandor Joffe, MD, Section Chief of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center; Stephen A Okon, MD, Consulting Staff, Assistant Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 6, 2009

Introduction

Hepatic adenoma is a rare, benign tumor of the liver.1,2,3,4 Two types of hepatic adenoma have been identified, including tumors of bile duct origin and tumors of liver cell origin. Hepatic adenomas of bile duct origin are usually smaller than 1 cm and are not of clinical interest; typically, they are found incidentally on postmortem examinations. Hepatic adenomas of liver origin are larger—on average, they measure 8-15 cm—and are often clinically significant.

T2-weighted fat-saturated fast spin-echo axial ma...

T2-weighted fat-saturated fast spin-echo axial magnetic resonance image in a patient with von Gierke disease (same patient in Images 1-9). This image shows 2 heterogeneous, hyperintense masses in the right lobe of the liver.

T2-weighted fat-saturated fast spin-echo axial ma...

T2-weighted fat-saturated fast spin-echo axial magnetic resonance image in a patient with von Gierke disease (same patient in Images 1-9). This image shows 2 heterogeneous, hyperintense masses in the right lobe of the liver.


Noncontrast computed tomography scan in a 41-year...

Noncontrast computed tomography scan in a 41-year-old woman with a history of oral contraceptive use (same patient in Images 10-12). This image demonstrates a heterogeneous, low-attenuation mass in the right lobe of the liver, a hepatic adenoma.

Noncontrast computed tomography scan in a 41-year...

Noncontrast computed tomography scan in a 41-year-old woman with a history of oral contraceptive use (same patient in Images 10-12). This image demonstrates a heterogeneous, low-attenuation mass in the right lobe of the liver, a hepatic adenoma.


For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Cancer and Tumors Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Liver Biopsy.

Related eMedicine topics:

Hepatic Cystadenomas

Hepatic Cysts

Hepatocellular Adenoma

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Pathophysiology

Histologically, sheets of well-differentiated hepatocytes characterize hepatic adenomas. The hepatocytes contain fat and glycogen and can produce bile; however, no bile ducts are present. A characteristic lack of portal vein tracts and terminal hepatic veins is noted. Approximately 80% of adenomas are solitary, and 20% are multiple. Most hepatic adenomas do not contain Kupffer cells.

Frequency

United States

Although hepatic adenomas may be idiopathic, the lesions are most often seen in young women who use oral contraceptives.1,5,6,7 The incidence among long-term users of oral contraceptives is approximately 4 cases per 100,000.7 In women who do not use oral contraceptives or have used them for less than 2 years, the incidence is 1 case per million. In addition, the incidence of hepatic adenomas is increased in patients with glycogen storage disease, diabetes mellitus, hemochromatosis, or acromegaly, as well as in males using anabolic steroids. Case reports by Hill et al indicated that hepatic adenoma is also an unusual complication of pregnancy.8 Hepatic steatosis may also be a risk factor.9

Mortality/Morbidity

Hepatic adenomas may rupture and bleed, causing right upper quadrant pain5,10,11 ; rarely, rupture may lead to hemorrhagic shock. Although they are benign lesions, hepatic adenomas can undergo malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1,6  Malignant transformation is rare, but for this reason, surgical resection is advocated in most patients with presumed hepatic adenomas.2,3,5,12 However, the primary reason for advocating surgical resection is the risk of hemorrhage. The risk of hemorrhage increases with increasing tumor size (>10.0 cm) and hormone use.13

Race

No known racial predilection for hepatic adenomas exists.

Sex

In a retrospective analysis of 437 patients with liver tumors, 44 patients had hepatic adenoma.12 Of these patients, Weimann et al reported a male-to-female ratio of 1:3.9 (9 men and 35 women).

Age

In the study by Weimann et al, the mean patient age was 34 years (range, 15-64 y) in those affected by hepatic adenoma (44 patients).12

Anatomy

Hepatic adenomas typically measure 8-15 cm. Sheets of well-differentiated hepatocytes characterize the lesions. The hepatocytes can produce bile, but no bile ducts are present. Portal vein tracts and terminal hepatic veins are lacking. Almost no hepatic adenomas contain Kupffer cells.

Presentation

Although benign, hepatic adenomas can present a diagnostic challenge because the lesions can be difficult to distinguish from other benign or malignant hepatic tumors. Clinically, patients with hepatic adenoma may be asymptomatic, and lesions may be found incidentally during laparotomy or when radiologic studies are performed. As a result of the large size of the tumor, often 8-15 cm, the patient or physician may notice a right upper quadrant mass or hepatomegaly, resulting in a referral for imaging. Hepatic adenomas can rupture and bleed, causing right upper quadrant pain, which may be mistaken clinically for acute cholecystitis. On rare occasions, rupture may lead to hemorrhagic shock.

Hepatic adenomas  are often seen in young women who use oral contraceptives. The lesions can occasionally regress after cessation of oral contraceptives; however, less commonly, enlargement has been observed after cessation.6

Rarely, hepatic adenomas may undergo malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels are helpful in differentiating hepatic adenoma from HCC. A high AFP level indicates the presence of HCC, although not all patients with HCC have elevated AFP levels.5 Several cases have been reported in which highly differentiated HCC was diagnosed within an adenoma, although preoperative AFP results were negative.1,10

In a patient who presents with hepatic hemorrhage that is not preceded by trauma and that is not attributable to anticoagulant therapy, consider the possibility of an underlying liver lesion. The 2 most common liver lesions causing hepatic hemorrhage are hepatic adenoma and HCC. Other neoplasms that can cause hepatic hemorrhage include liver tumors such as focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), hemangiomas, and metastases. Other rare causes of nontraumatic hepatic hemorrhage exist, such as amyloidosis and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome, which is seen in a small subset of women with preeclampsia.

In patients with hepatic adenoma, abnormal liver function enzyme levels have been observed, including elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels. Although patients with FNH often have normal liver function test results, elevated GGT levels may also be seen. Therefore, distinguishing HA from FNH based on laboratory data is usually not possible.

According to Ahmad et al, cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 19 immunostains, along with neuronal cell adhesion molecule immunostain, performed on liver needle biopsies can help distinguish hepatic adenoma from focal nodular hyperplasia and may be helpful in diagnosing difficult cases.14

Iyer et al also confirmed that in hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia, specific patterns of immunostains cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 19, and neuronal cell adhesion molecule are seen, which may suggest the activation of different subsets of hepatic progenitor/stem cell that can be useful diagnostically.15

Related eMedicine topics:

Hemangiomas, Hepatic

Liver Tumors

Preferred Examination

A combination of multiphasic computed tomography (CT) scans and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is best to identify and characterize most hepatic lesions (see CT Scan and MRI, respectively). Certain characteristics, such as arterial enhancement and the presence of fat and hemorrhage, suggest that the lesion represents hepatic adenoma. If an enhancing central scar is seen, the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) can be made. Nuclear medicine studies can also be helpful. Most hepatic adenomas do not demonstrate uptake on sulfur-colloid and gallium-67 (67 Ga) scans.16

Limitations of Techniques

Although CT scanning, MRI, and nuclear medicine studies may help characterize lesions as adenomas, the findings are frequently nonspecific, and biopsy and/or resection may be necessary.

Differential Diagnoses

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Fibrolamellar
Liver, Metastases
Liver, Trauma

More on Hepatic Adenoma

Overview: Hepatic Adenoma
Imaging: Hepatic Adenoma
Follow-up: Hepatic Adenoma
Multimedia: Hepatic Adenoma
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Micchelli ST, Vivekanandan P, Boitnott JK, et al. Malignant transformation of hepatic adenomas. Mod Pathol. Apr 2008;21(4):491-7. [Medline].

  2. Ibrahim S, Chen CL, Wang SH, et al. Liver resection for benign liver tumors: indications and outcome. Am J Surg. Jan 2007;193(1):5-9. [Medline].

  3. Herman P, Pugliese V, Machado MA, et al. Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: differential diagnosis and treatment. World J Surg. Mar 2000;24(3):372-6. [Medline].

  4. Kume N, Suga K, Nishigauchi K, Shimizu K, Matsunaga N. Characterization of hepatic adenoma with atypical appearance on CT and MRI by radionuclide imaging. Clin Nucl Med. Dec 1997;22(12):825-31. [Medline].

  5. Ault GT, Wren SM, Ralls PW, Reynolds TB, Stain SC. Selective management of hepatic adenomas. Am Surg. Oct 1996;62(10):825-9. [Medline].

  6. Gyorffy EJ, Bredfeldt JE, Black WC. Transformation of hepatic cell adenoma to hepatocellular carcinoma due to oral contraceptive use. Ann Intern Med. Mar 15 1989;110(6):489-90. [Medline].

  7. Rooks JB, Ory HW, Ishak KG, et al. Epidemiology of hepatocellular adenoma. The role of oral contraceptive use. JAMA. Aug 17 1979;242(7):644-8. [Medline].

  8. Hill MA, Albert T, Zieske A, Levine EA. Successful resection of multifocal hepatic adenoma during pregnancy. South Med J. Mar 1997;90(3):357-61. [Medline].

  9. Veteläinen R, Erdogan D, de Graaf W, ten Kate F, Jansen PL, Gouma DJ, et al. Liver adenomatosis: re-evaluation of aetiology and management. Liver Int. Apr 2008;28(4):499-508. [Medline].

  10. Casillas VJ, Amendola MA, Gascue A, et al. Imaging of nontraumatic hemorrhagic hepatic lesions. Radiographics. Mar-Apr 2000;20(2):367-78. [Medline][Full Text].

  11. Welch TJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Johnson CM, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: comparison of angiography, CT, US, and scintigraphy. Radiology. Sep 1985;156(3):593-5. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. Weimann A, Ringe B, Klempnauer J, et al. Benign liver tumors: differential diagnosis and indications for surgery. World J Surg. Nov-Dec 1997;21(9):983-90; discussion 990-1. [Medline].

  13. Deneve JL, Pawlik TM, Cunningham S, Clary B, Reddy S, Scoggins CR, et al. Liver Cell Adenoma: A Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Rupture and Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. Jan 8 2009;[Medline].

  14. Ahmad I, Iyer A, Marginean CE, Yeh MM, Ferrell L, Qin L, et al. Diagnostic use of cytokeratins, CD34, and neuronal cell adhesion molecule staining in focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma. Hum Pathol. Jan 19 2009;[Medline].

  15. Iyer A, Robert ME, Bifulco CB, Salem RR, Jain D. Different cytokeratin and neuronal cell adhesion molecule staining patterns in focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma and their significance. Hum Pathol. Sep 2008;39(9):1370-7. [Medline].

  16. Wojtowycz M, ed. Handbook of Interventional Radiology and Angiography. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1995:77-83.

  17. Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Nalesnik M. Hepatocellular adenoma: multiphasic CT and histopathologic findings in 25 patients. Radiology. Mar 2000;214(3):861-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  18. Paulson EK, McClellan JS, Washington K, et al. Hepatic adenoma: MR characteristics and correlation with pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1994;163(1):113-6. [Medline][Full Text].

  19. Paley MR, Mergo PJ, Torres GM, Ros PR. Characterization of focal hepatic lesions with ferumoxides-enhanced T2-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 2000;175(1):159-63. [Medline][Full Text].

  20. Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Glockner JF, et al. MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2008;190(6):1534-40. [Medline].

  21. Chang SD, Thoeni RF. Effect of T1 shortening on T2-weighted MRI sequences: comparison of hepatic mass conspicuity on images acquired before and after gadolinium enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 2008;190(5):1318-23. [Medline].

  22. Giovanoli O, Heim M, Terracciano L, Bongartz G, Ledermann HP. MRI of hepatic adenomatosis: initial observations with gadoxetic acid contrast agent in three patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 2008;190(5):W290-3. [Medline].

  23. Cherqui D, Rahmouni A, Charlotte F, et al. Management of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in young women: a series of 41 patients with clinical, radiological, and pathological correlations. Hepatology. Dec 1995;22(6):1674-81. [Medline].

  24. Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, eds. Diagnostic Ultrasound. Vol 1. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1998:129-30.

  25. Morin SH, Lim AK, Cobbold JF, Taylor-Robinson SD. Use of second generation contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of focal liver lesions. World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7 2007;13(45):5963-70. [Medline][Full Text].

  26. Patel PM, Alibazoglu H, Ali A, Fordham E, LaMonica G. 'False-positive' uptake of FDG in a hepatic adenoma. Clin Nucl Med. Jul 1997;22(7):490-1. [Medline].

  27. Arrivé L, Fléjou JF, Vilgrain V, et al. Hepatic adenoma: MR findings in 51 pathologically proved lesions. Radiology. Nov 1994;193(2):507-12. [Medline][Full Text].

  28. Davis LP, McCarroll K. Correlative imaging of the liver and hepatobiliary system. Semin Nucl Med. Jul 1994;24(3):208-18. [Medline].

  29. Dunphy T. Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions. Appl Radiol. 2001;30(suppl):69-70.

Keywords

hepatic adenoma, hepatocellular adenoma, liver adenoma, liver tumor, HA, benign liver tumor, benign epithelial tumor of the liver, liver cell adenoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC, focal nodular hyperplasia, FNH, Kupffer cells, Kupffer's cells

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Karen Kodsi Garfield, MD, Attending Physician in Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, St Luke's Hospital
Karen Kodsi Garfield, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Sandor Joffe, MD, Section Chief of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center
Sandor Joffe, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Stephen A Okon, MD, Consulting Staff, Assistant Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center
Stephen A Okon, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association and American Roentgen Ray Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Neela Lamki, MD, Professor, Department of Radiology, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman; Adjunct Professor, Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Paul M Silverman, MD, Professor, Chief of Body Imaging, Chair in Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Paul M Silverman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Karani, MBBS, FRCR, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.