eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Gastrointestinal

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Fibrolamellar

Author: W Ross Stevens, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Radiology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine; Head, Radiology Residency Director, Division of Gastrointestinal Radiology, St John's Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 22, 2007

Introduction

Background

Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, or fibrolamellar carcinoma, is an uncommon malignant neoplasm of the liver. Fibrolamellar carcinoma has distinctive clinical, histologic, and radiographic features that distinguish it from the relatively more common hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fibrolamellar carcinoma occurs in a younger population than does HCC, and it is typically not associated with underlying liver disease or elevated serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein tumor markers.1 Also, fibrolamellar carcinoma may have a slightly better prognosis than HCC.

Perhaps because of the younger ages of the patients and the lack of coexisting cirrhosis, patients with fibrolamellar carcinoma are often treated aggressively. Resection of large tumor masses, of metastatic disease, and even of recurrent disease can extend patient survival. Radiographic evaluation of patients with fibrolamellar carcinoma may be used for the initial diagnosis of the tumor, for the preoperative staging of the disease, and for follow-up surveillance to detect recurrent or metastatic disease.

Pathophysiology

Gross findings

Fibrolamellar carcinoma most commonly presents as a large, solitary intrahepatic mass with well-defined margins and a lobulated contour. The tumors are typically large at the time of diagnosis, with a mean diameter of 10-20 cm. Regional lymph node metastases are found in 50-70% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Portal or hepatic venous invasion is not typical. Grossly, the primary tumor appears as a well-demarcated, lobular, bile-stained, white or tan mass with a central stellate scar or fibrotic bands. Hemorrhage and necrosis are uncommon.

Central calcification is present in 35-60% of tumors and thus can be a useful diagnostic feature. However, fibrolamellar carcinomas are not the only liver tumors in which calcifications appear; calcifications may also be found in a minority of HCCs, as well as in some metastatic tumors, such as those arising from mucinous colon or ovarian carcinomas.

Microscopic findings

Microscopically, fibrolamellar carcinomas have a characteristic pattern of nests, sheets, or cords of malignant cells, which are separated by lamellar bands of dense, hypocellular collagen connective tissue. The fibrotic connective tissue coalesces into the central scar. The malignant cells are usually well-differentiated polygonal cells containing granular cytoplasm, large nuclei, and prominent nucleoli.

Metastatic lesions appear to be histopathologically similar to the primary tumors.

The internal architecture of fibrolamellar carcinomas may be heterogeneous, and foci of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) may occur in the liver, adjacent to the tumors. For accurate diagnosis at percutaneous biopsy, the acquisition of multiple core specimens is recommended to avoid misdiagnosis resulting from sampling error.

Staging

Tumors may be graded histologically according to the Broders method, as follows2 :

  • In grade 1 tumors, 75-100% of the tumor cells are well differentiated.
  • In grade 2 tumors, 50-75% of the tumor cells are well differentiated.
  • In grade 3 tumors, 25-50% of the tumor cells are well differentiated.
  • In grade 4 tumors, 0-25% of the tumor cells are well differentiated.

See also Clinical Details, Staging .

Frequency

United States

HCC is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and accounts for approximately 2-3% of all cancers in the United States. Fibrolamellar carcinoma accounts for fewer than 10% of all cases of HCC, but it accounts for approximately 35% of all cases of HCC in patients younger than 50 years who do not also have cirrhosis.

International

The more common form of HCC has a greater prevalence in Asia than in it does in the United States, accounting for as many as 40% of all cancer cases in endemic areas. However, the prevalence of fibrolamellar carcinoma in Asia is lower than it is in the United States.

Mortality/Morbidity

  • In patients with fibrolamellar carcinoma, the reported 5-year survival rates are approximately 25-30% if all patients are included. However, the rates increase to as high as 63% in patients in whom tumors are resected.
  • Long-term survival as long as 14 years has been reported.
  • Although the postoperative recurrence of fibrolamellar carcinoma is high, ranging from 42-100% in reported series, aggressive surgical management, including the resection of recurrent and metastatic disease, has been reported to improve survival rates and disease-free intervals.

Race

No racial predilection has been reported in fibrolamellar carcinoma.

Sex

No clear sex predilection has been reported in fibrolamellar carcinoma.

Age

Fibrolamellar carcinoma occurs primarily in young adults. Reported series indicate a patient age range of 5-69 years, with a mean age of 23 years at the time of initial diagnosis.

Anatomy

Fibrolamellar carcinoma may occur anywhere in the liver. Anatomically, the liver is composed of right, left, and caudate lobes. It can be further divided into 8 surgical subsegments based on the locations of the major portal and hepatic venous structures. Attention to the location and extent of fibrolamellar tumors with respect to the surgical anatomy is important because tumor resection is recommended in most patients.

Metastatic tumoral involvement is most common in the regional lymph nodes of the porta hepatis or celiac axis. Distant metastases to the lungs, paraspinal tissues, and supraclavicular lymph nodes have been reported.

Presentation

Presentation

Patients with fibrolamellar carcinoma may present with abdominal pain, a palpable abdominal mass, hepatomegaly, or cachexia. Jaundice is not common. Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels are within the reference range or mildly elevated. Liver function test results may be elevated. Patients typically do not have hepatitis or cirrhosis. Computed tomography (CT) scan findings usually suggest the diagnosis.

Staging

Fibrolamellar carcinoma is usually advanced at the time of initial diagnosis. Primary tumors are large, with a reported mean diameter of 10-20 cm. Extrahepatic disease, most often in regional lymph nodes, is present in as many as 80% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Portal or hepatic venous invasion may occur, but it is not common. Diffuse intraperitoneal carcinomatosis has been reported. Distant metastases are typically not found at the time of presentation.

Recurrence and follow-up

Fibrolamellar carcinoma is an aggressive tumor that in most patients progresses to recurrent liver masses and metastatic lymph node metastases. Recurrent lesions often develop 6-18 months after attempted curative resection and may progress rapidly; therefore, follow-up imaging is recommended at 2- to 4-month intervals for at least 12-18 months after resection of the primary tumor. The early detection of metastatic disease is important because surgical resection of metastases improves patient survival rates.

Preferred Examination

Abdominal CT scanning is the preferred examination for the detection, diagnosis, staging, and postoperative follow-up evaluation of fibrolamellar carcinoma.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver can be useful in detecting and characterizing primary tumors, and MRI may be slightly more sensitive than CT scanning in detecting multiple intrahepatic recurrent lesions. However, MRI is less sensitive than CT scanning in the detection of extrahepatic disease.

Ultrasonography has been used in the surveillance of the progression of known intrahepatic lesions. Radionuclide sulfur-colloid scans or scans obtained with labeled red blood cells are occasionally useful in the differentiation of fibrolamellar carcinomas from other types of hepatic tumors. Percutaneous biopsy with CT scanning or ultrasonographic guidance may be necessary for a definitive preoperative diagnosis of fibrolamellar carcinoma.

Limitations of Techniques

For the best evaluation of the liver and liver tumors with CT scanning, the intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material is necessary. Therefore, the use of CT scanning is limited in patients who cannot have iodinated contrast material because of an allergy or renal insufficiency. In these patients, MRI is preferred. In addition, CT scanning uses ionizing radiation; therefore, it can be relatively contraindicated in children or in women of childbearing age, in whom radiation doses should be limited as much as possible.

The imaging time with MRI examinations tends to be longer than with CT scanning or ultrasonography. In patients who are unwilling or unable to remain still during the imaging period, poor-quality images can result because of motion artifact; these artifacts can limit the usefulness of the MRI examination. Some patients may become claustrophobic while they are in the MRI machine; patients may require sedation, or they may not be able to complete the examination. Because of the high magnetic field strength, MRI is contraindicated in patients with a cardiac pacemaker or some internal metallic object, such as an aneurysm clip or metal shrapnel or filings in a critical location.

Ultrasonography is more operator dependent than is CT scanning or MRI, and poor technique in scanning can limit its diagnostic usefulness. Ultrasonography may be limited by the patient's anatomy. Hepatic imaging may be difficult in obese patients or in patients whose liver is located high under the ribs. Overlying bowel gas may obscure portions of the liver in some patients.

Differential Diagnoses

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
Hepatic Adenoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma

More on Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Fibrolamellar

Overview: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Fibrolamellar
Imaging: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Fibrolamellar
Follow-up: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Fibrolamellar
Multimedia: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Fibrolamellar
References

References

  1. Titelbaum DS, Burke DR, Meranze SG, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: pitfalls in nonoperative diagnosis. Radiology. Apr 1988;167(1):25-30. [Medline][Full Text].

  2. Broders AC. The grading of carcinoma. Minn Med. 1925;8:726-30.

  3. McLarney JK, Rucker PT, Bender GN, et al. Fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. Mar-Apr 1999;19(2):453-71. [Medline][Full Text].

  4. Bedi DG, Kumar R, Morettin LB, et al. Fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver: CT, ultrasound and angiography. Case report. Eur J Radiol. May 1988;8(2):109-12. [Medline].

  5. Berman MM, Libbey NP, Foster JH. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Polygonal cell type with fibrous stroma--an atypical variant with a favorable prognosis. Cancer. Sep 15 1980;46(6):1448-55. [Medline].

  6. Brandt DJ, Johnson CD, Stephens DH, et al. Imaging of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 1988;151(2):295-9. [Medline].

  7. Craig JR, Peters RL, Edmondson HA, et al. Fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver: a tumor of adolescents and young adults with distinctive clinico-pathologic features. Cancer. Jul 15 1980;46(2):372-9. [Medline].

  8. Farhi DC, Shikes RH, Murari PJ, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in young people. Cancer. Oct 15 1983;52(8):1516-25. [Medline].

  9. Farhi DC, Shikes RH, Silverberg SG. Ultrastructure of fibrolamellar oncocytic hepatoma. Cancer. Aug 15 1982;50(4):702-9. [Medline].

  10. Francis IR, Agha FP, Thompson NW, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocarcinoma: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features. Gastrointest Radiol. 1986;11(1):67-72. [Medline].

  11. Friedman AC, Lichtenstein JE, Goodman Z, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology. Dec 1985;157(3):583-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging and pathologic findings in 31 recent cases. Radiology. Nov 1999;213(2):352-61. [Medline][Full Text].

  13. Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: pre- and posttherapy evaluation with CT and MR imaging. Radiology. Oct 2000;217(1):145-51. [Medline][Full Text].

  14. Joishy SK, Balasegaram M. Hepatic resection for malignant tumors of the liver: essentials for a unified surgical approach. Am J Surg. Mar 1980;139(3):360-9. [Medline].

  15. Lack EE, Neave C, Vawter GF. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Review of 32 cases in childhood and adolescence. Cancer. Oct 15 1983;52(8):1510-5. [Medline].

  16. Moreno-Luna LE, Arrieta O, García-Leiva J, et al. Clinical and pathologic factors associated with survival in young adult patients with fibrolamellar hepatocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:142. [Medline][Full Text].

  17. Mukai JK, Stack CM, Turner DA, et al. Imaging of surgically relevant hepatic vascular and segmental anatomy. Part 2. Extent and resectability of hepatic neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 1987;149(2):293-7. [Medline].

  18. Nagorney DM, Adson MA, Weiland LH, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatoma. Am J Surg. Jan 1985;149(1):113-9. [Medline].

  19. Soreide O, Czerniak A, Bradpiece H, et al. Characteristics of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. A study of nine cases and a review of the literature. Am J Surg. Apr 1986;151(4):518-23. [Medline].

  20. Soyer P, Roche A, Levesque M, et al. CT of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Jul-Aug 1991;15(4):533-8. [Medline].

  21. Stevens WR, Johnson CD, Stephens DH, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: stage at presentation and results of aggressive surgical management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 1995;164(5):1153-8. [Medline].

  22. Stipa F, Yoon SS, Liau KH, et al. Outcome of patients with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. Mar 15 2006;106(6):1331-8. [Medline].

  23. Vecchio FM. Fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver: a distinct entity within the hepatocellular tumors. A review. Appl Pathol. 1988;6(2):139-48. [Medline].

  24. Wetzel WJ, Costin JL, Petrino RL. Fibrolamellar carcinoma: distinctive clinical and morphologic variant of hepatoma. South Med J. Jun 1983;76(6):796-8. [Medline].

  25. Wong LK, Link DP, Frey CF, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocarcinoma: radiology, management, and pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1982;139(1):172-5. [Medline].

  26. Wood WJ, Rawlings M, Evans H, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: importance of histologic classification as a prognostic factor. Am J Surg. May 1988;155(5):663-6. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

HCC, fibrolamellar carcinoma, fibrolamellar hepatoma, oncocytic hepatocellular carcinoma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

W Ross Stevens, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Radiology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine; Head, Radiology Residency Director, Division of Gastrointestinal Radiology, St John's Hospital
W Ross Stevens, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, American Roentgen Ray Society, Illinois State Medical Society, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

John L Haddad, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Director of Body MRI, Department of Radiology, Methodist Hospital in Houston
John L Haddad, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Udo P Schmiedl, MD, PhD, Clinical Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Washington; Consulting Staff, Swedish Medical Center, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle Radiologists
Udo P Schmiedl, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Karani, MBBS, FRCR, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.