eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Genitourinary

Renal Artery Stenosis/Renovascular Hypertension: Follow-up

Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, Consultant Radiologist and Honorary Professor, North Manchester General Hospital Pennine Acute NHS Trust, UK
Coauthor(s): Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute; Muhammad Sohaib, MBBS, MSc, Principal Medical Officer, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Sciences, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences; Shabana Saeed, MBBS, MSc, Head, Department of Medical Sciences, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences; Consulting Staff, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Oct 2, 2009

Intervention

Interventions appropriate for patients with RAS/RVHT include medical therapy, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), vascular stent placement, intravascular ultrasonography-guided atherectomy, and surgical revascularization.44,45,46,9

Medical therapy

Treatment with antihypertensive drugs is indicated, and optimal blood pressure control is essential. ACE inhibitors should be avoided. Other risk factors that should be addressed include atherosclerosis, smoking, and hyperlipidemia. Definitive therapy for the underlying cause should always be considered to prevent the development of ischemic nephropathy. In patients with diffuse atherosclerosis, the complication rate with both surgery and angioplasty is relatively high. Medical therapy may be preferred to other treatments.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

PTA has become the procedure of choice for the treatment of symptomatic stenoses. Patency rates after PTA are strongly dependent on the size of the vessel treated and the quality of inflow and outflow through the vessel. RAS is an established cause of either RVHT or chronic renal insufficiency. Because of the excellent results obtained with renal angioplasty, it is the most commonly performed procedure for patients with symptomatic RAS.11,47

Previously, angioplasty was considered to be contraindicated for patients with a solitary or transplanted kidney. This is no longer the case, and angioplasty is now considered the procedure of choice for treatment of RAS in these patients.

Technical success is achieved in more than 90% of patients; patency rates are 90-95% at 2 years for MFP and 80-85% for atherosclerosis. Restenosis requiring repeat angioplasty has been reported in fewer than 10% of patients with AD and in 8-30% with atherosclerotic stenosis. Improvement in blood pressure control with fewer antihypertensive medications is achieved in 30-35% of patients with fibromuscular lesions and in 50-60% of patients with atherosclerotic lesions. A success rate of 83% has been reported with PTA in RAS associated with renal transplantation.

Vascular stent placement

Vascular stenting is considered complementary to PTA.

Many vascular stents are now available. Some stents are metallic and are either self-expanding or balloon expandable. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a few of these for peripheral coronary procedures and for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures.

The ultimate role of stents in the treatment of vascular disease is not yet established, but these devices have already had a dramatic impact on the practice of interventional radiology.10 In studies from both the US and Europe, stenting of smaller vessels has resulted in an unacceptably high incidence of thrombosis. These problems are being addressed in the development of new stent materials and coatings.

Intravascular stents placed during angioplasty may be helpful in the prevention of restenosis and the management of RAS. Early results suggest that stenting may prove useful in patients with ostial disease, in those in whom restenosis occurs after PTA, and in those with complications (eg, renal artery dissection) resulting from PTA. Primary renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic RAS has a high technical success rate and a low complication rate.

Intravascular ultrasonography-guided atherectomy

In a single reported case, hypertension secondary to AD was successfully diagnosed with intravascular sonography, and intravascular sonography-guided renal atherectomy was curative.

Surgical revascularization

Currently, surgical revascularization is reserved for patients in whom the main renal artery appears completely occluded and in whom the surviving renal parenchyma is vascularized by collaterals. Surgical revascularization might also be used when an ostial stenosis is present with a buttressing atheroma on either side of the ostium. Some of these lesions may also be amenable to percutaneous vascular stent placement.

Several surgical options are available. The stenotic segment may be excised and the artery resutured directly onto either the aorta or surviving stump. A vein graft may be transplanted or the kidney resected and reimplanted in the iliac fossa with the renal artery anastomosed to the iliac artery. Another novel method involves a splenectomy and anastomoses of the splenic artery to the renal artery when RAS involves the left kidney. The underlying diagnosis determines the results of this surgery. With advanced diffuse atherosclerosis, surgery may become less feasible because the certainty that the RAS is the cause of the hypertension is less and the prognosis may be determined by comorbidities.

A potential complication is the release of cholesterol emboli during the surgery; however, 80-90% of patients undergoing operation for atherosclerotic RAS benefit with cure or improvement. The perioperative mortality rate is less than 5%. In patients with AD, the cure rate is as high as 80%, and morbidity rates are low. However, similar results can be achieved with the minimally invasive renal angioplasty technique, with considerably less morbidity, mortality, and expense. In patients with diffuse atherosclerosis, the complication rate with both surgery and angioplasty is relatively high.48

Measurement of renin activity

Antihypertensive therapy may increase or decrease plasma renin levels. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can also decrease plasma renin levels. The baseline plasma renin activity is elevated in 50-80% of patients with RVHT. Measuring the increase in the baseline plasma renin activity 1 hour after the administration of 25-50 mg of the ACE inhibitor captopril can increase the predictive value of baseline plasma renin activity. In patients with RAS, the baseline plasma renin activity is significantly increased, perhaps as a result of the cessation of the normal suppressive effect of high angiotensin II levels on renin secretion in the ischemic kidney.

The sensitivity and specificity of the captopril renin test are 75-100% and 60-95%, respectively. A major limitation is the need to discontinue antihypertensive therapy, including the use of ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, and diuretics, because these agents can affect the baseline plasma renin activity. The sensitivity of the test is also low, and its predictive value is lower than that of a captopril renogram.

Ischemic kidneys release higher levels of renin in their veins. Renal venous sampling can be used to measure renin levels so as to compare the venous drainage from each kidney; the resulting data can be used to predict the degree of renal ischemia and the potential success of surgical revascularization. A 1.5-fold increase in renin level in the ischemic kidney is a positive result and suggests that revascularization may be successful in the treatment of elevated blood pressure.

Renin secretion in the contralateral kidney is suppressed, as evidenced by the fact that the levels of renin in the renal artery, the infrarenal inferior vena cava, and the renal vein are similar. Approximately 10% of healthy patients have a ratio above 1.5, and fewer than 20% have a ratio below 1.1. The accuracy of the measurements may improve by prior administration of an ACE inhibitor, which increases renin secretion on the affected side.

False-negative and false-positive results occur frequently. Although more than 90% of patients with unilateral RAS and increased renin levels in the affected renal vein have a positive response to angioplasty or surgery, approximately 50% of patients with nondiagnostic findings also benefit from revascularization. As a result, most clinicians rely on the clinical index of suspicion rather than renin measurements in the renal vein to estimate the physiologic significance of RAS. However, these renin measurements may still be useful in patients with bilateral RAS, in whom measurements may determine the side that most contributes to the hypertension.

Medicolegal Pitfalls

  • Patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency are at significant risk for contrast–induced acute tubular necrosis and atheroembolic renal failure, which could result in permanent or temporary dialysis. These complications must be discussed with the patient and put into perspective before any invasive procedure (eg, surgery, angiography, or angioplasty) is performed.
  • Contrast nephropathy typically manifests as a transient increase in the serum creatinine level 3-6 days after the administration of iodinated contrast material.
    • Contrast nephropathy is reported in as many as 40% of patients with underlying renal failure.
    • Most patients with contrast nephropathy ultimately recover renal function.
    • Porter reviewed results from nearly 300 patients with contrast nephropathy and concluded that fewer than 10% required permanent dialysis.49

See also the Medscape topic Medical Malpractice and Legal Issues.

 


More on Renal Artery Stenosis/Renovascular Hypertension

Overview: Renal Artery Stenosis/Renovascular Hypertension
Imaging: Renal Artery Stenosis/Renovascular Hypertension
Follow-up: Renal Artery Stenosis/Renovascular Hypertension
Multimedia: Renal Artery Stenosis/Renovascular Hypertension
References

References

  1. Broekhuizen-de Gast HS, Tiel-van Buul MM, Van Beek EJ. Severe hypertension in children with renovascular disease. Clin Nucl Med. Jul 2001;26(7):606-9. [Medline].

  2. Courtel JV, Soto B, Niaudet P, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of renal artery stenosis in children. Pediatr Radiol. Jan 1998;28(1):59-63. [Medline].

  3. Estepa R, Gallego N, Orte L, et al. Renovascular hypertension in children. Scand J Urol Nephrol. Oct 2001;35(5):388-92. [Medline].

  4. Sharathkumar AA, Stanley JC. Management of a child with renal artery stenosis and homozygous factor V Leiden mutation. J Pediatr Surg. Jan 2008;43(1):e17-9. [Medline].

  5. Minor RL Jr, Straw SM. Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: Prevalence, Natural History, Noninvasiveive Diagnosis and Endovascular Therapy Using Palmaz Stents. J Invasive Cardiol. Sep 1997;9(7):489-499. [Medline].

  6. Weaver FA, Kuehne JP, Papanicolaou G. A recent institutional experience with renovascular hypertension. Am Surg. Mar 1996;62(3):241-5. [Medline].

  7. Textor SC. Renovascular hypertension in 2007: where are we now?. Curr Cardiol Rep. Nov 2007;9(6):453-61. [Medline].

  8. van Helvoort-Postulart D, Dirksen CD, Nelemans PJ, Kroon AA, Kessels AG, de Leeuw PW, et al. Renal artery stenosis: cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment. Radiology. Aug 2007;244(2):505-13. [Medline].

  9. Patel VI, Conrad MF, Kwolek CJ, LaMuraglia GM, Chung TK, Cambria RP. Renal artery revascularization: outcomes stratified by indication for intervention. J Vasc Surg. Jun 2009;49(6):1480-9. [Medline].

  10. Leesar MA, Varma J, Shapira A, Fahsah I, Raza ST, Elghoul Z, et al. Prediction of hypertension improvement after stenting of renal artery stenosis: comparative accuracy of translesional pressure gradients, intravascular ultrasound, and angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 23 2009;53(25):2363-71. [Medline].

  11. Jensen G, Annerstedt M, Klingenstierna H, Herlitz H, Aurell M, Hellström M. Survival and quality of life after renal angioplasty: a five-year follow-up study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(3):236-41. [Medline].

  12. Goldblatt H, Lynch J, Hanzal RF, Summerville WW. Studies on experimental hypertension. I The production of persistent elevation of systolic blood pressure by means of renal ischemia. J Exp Med. 1934;59:347-348.

  13. Kasirajan K, O'Hara PJ, Gray BH, Hertzer NR, Clair DG, Greenberg RK, et al. Chronic mesenteric ischemia: open surgery versus percutaneous angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. Jan 2001;33(1):63-71. [Medline].

  14. BURKLAND CE, GOODWIN WE, LEADBETTER WF. The cure of hypertension by nephrectomy; a ten-year follow-up of a case. Surgery. Jul 1950;28(1):67-70. [Medline].

  15. Leadbetter WF, Burkland CE. Hypertension in unilateral renal disease. J Urol. 1938;39:611-625.

  16. McCormack LJ, Dusten HP, Meaney TF. Selected pathology of the renal artery. Semin Roentgenol. 1967;2:126-138.

  17. Rafalowska J. Genetically determined vascular diseases. Folia Neuropathol. 1999;37(4):210-6. [Medline].

  18. Goncharenko V, Gerlock AJ Jr, Shaff MI, Hollifield JW. Pregression of renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia in 42 patients as seen on angiography. Radiology. 1981;139:45-51.

  19. Kuczera P, Wloszczynska E, Adamczak M, Pencak P, Chudek J, Wiecek A. Frequency of renal artery stenosis and variants of renal vascularization in hypertensive patients: analysis of 1550 angiographies in one centre. J Hum Hypertens. Jun 2009;23(6):396-401. [Medline].

  20. Crowley JJ, Santos RM, Peter RH, Puma JA, Schwab SJ, Phillips HR, et al. Progression of renal artery stenosis in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J. Nov 1998;136(5):913-8. [Medline].

  21. Holley KE, Hunt JC, Brown AL, Kincaid OW, Sheps SG. Renal artery stenosis. A clinical-pathological study in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Am J Med. 1964;37:124–132.

  22. Gilfeather M, Yoon HC, Siegelman ES, Axel L, Stolpen AH, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. Feb 1999;210(2):367-72. [Medline].

  23. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. Sep 18 2001;135(6):401-11. [Medline].

  24. Textor SC, Glockner JF, Lerman LO, Misra S, McKusick MA, Riederer SJ, et al. The use of magnetic resonance to evaluate tissue oxygenation in renal artery stenosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. Apr 2008;19(4):780-8. [Medline].

  25. Durand E, Blaufox MD, Britton KE, Carlsen O, Cosgriff P, Fine E, et al. International Scientific Committee of Radionuclides in Nephrourology (ISCORN) consensus on renal transit time measurements. Semin Nucl Med. Jan 2008;38(1):82-102. [Medline].

  26. Lie JT. Pathology of angiodysplasia in Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Pathol Res Pract. Nov 1988;183(6):747-55. [Medline].

  27. Beregi JP, Louvegny S, Gautier C, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal arteries: comparison of helical CT angiography and arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 1999;172(1):27-34. [Medline].

  28. Saba L, Sanfilippo R, Montisci R, Conti M, Mallarini G. Accessory renal artery stenosis and hypertension: are these correlated? Evaluation using multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography. Acta Radiol. Apr 2008;49(3):278-84. [Medline].

  29. Drieghe B, Madaric J, Sarno G, Manoharan G, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, et al. Assessment of renal artery stenosis: side-by-side comparison of angiography and duplex ultrasound with pressure gradient measurements. Eur Heart J. Feb 2008;29(4):517-24. [Medline].

  30. Josephs SC. Techniques in interventional radiology: renal CT angiography. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. Dec 2006;9(4):167-71. [Medline].

  31. Andreoni KA, Weeks SM, Gerber DA, et al. Incidence of donor renal fibromuscular dysplasia: does it justify routine angiography?. Transplantation. Apr 15 2002;73(7):1112-6. [Medline].

  32. Marcos HB, Choyke PL. Magnetic resonance angiography of the kidney. Semin Nephrol. Sep 2000;20(5):450-5. [Medline].

  33. Papachristopoulos G, Bis KG, Shetty AN. Breath-hold 3D MR angiography of the renal vasculature using a contrast- enhanced multiecho gradient-echo technique. Invest Radiol. Dec 1999;34(12):731-8. [Medline].

  34. Stacul F, Gava S, Belgrano M, Cernic S, Pagnan L, Pozzi Mucelli F, et al. Renal artery stenosis: Comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA. Radiol Med (Torino). May 15 2008;[Medline].

  35. Hoshino Y, Nakamura T, Nakano A, et al. Successful treatment of renovascular hypertension due to fibromuscular dysplasia by intravascular ultrasound-guided atherectomy. Nephron. Jul 2002;91(3):521-5. [Medline].

  36. Majd M, Potter BM, Guzzetta PC, Ruley EJ. Effect of captopril on efficacy of renal scintigraphy in detection of renal artery stenosis. J Nucl Med. 1983;24:23.

  37. Fine EJ. Diuretic renography and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor renography. Radiol Clin North Am. Sep 2001;39(5):979-95. [Medline].

  38. Goto A, Kawauchi N. Images in clinical medicine. Captopril-augmented renal scan. N Engl J Med. Feb 8 2001;344(6):430. [Medline].

  39. Maini A, Gambhir S, Singhal M. Aspirin renography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension: a comparative study with captopril renography. Nucl Med Commun. Apr 2000;21(4):325-31. [Medline].

  40. van de Ven PJ, de Klerk JM, Mertens IJ, et al. Aspirin renography and captopril renography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. J Nucl Med. Aug 2000;41(8):1337-42. [Medline].

  41. Imanishi M, Yano M, Okumura M, et al. Aspirin renography in diagnosis of unilateral renovascular hypertension. Hypertens Res. Sep 1998;21(3):209-13. [Medline].

  42. Ergun EL, Caglar M, Erdem Y, et al. Tc-99m DTPA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) renography in the detection of renovascular hypertension. Clin Nucl Med. Sep 2000;25(9):682-90. [Medline].

  43. Kiratli PO, Caner B, Altun B. Superiority of tc-99m MAG3 to tc-99m DTPA in treating a patient with mild renal artery stenosis. Ann Nucl Med. Feb 2001;15(1):45-8. [Medline].

  44. Birrer M, Do DD, Mahler F, et al. Treatment of renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia with balloon angioplasty: a prospective follow-up study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. Feb 2002;23(2):146-52. [Medline].

  45. van Jaarsveld BC, Krijnen P, Pieterman H, et al. The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med. Apr 6 2000;342(14):1007-14. [Medline].

  46. Wykrzykowska JJ, Williams M, Laham RJ. Stabilization of renal function, improvement in blood pressure control and pulmonary edema symptoms after opening a totally occluded renal artery. J Invasive Cardiol. Jan 2008;20(1):E26-9. [Medline].

  47. Eklöf H, Bergqvist D, Hägg A, Nyman R. Outcome after endovascular revascularization of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Acta Radiol. Apr 2009;50(3):256-64. [Medline].

  48. O''Neill JA Jr. Long-term outcome with surgical treatment of renovascular hypertension. J Pediatr Surg. Jan 1998;33(1):106-11. [Medline].

  49. Porter GA. Contrast associated nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:22E-26E.

Further Reading

Keywords

renal artery stenosis, renovascular hypertension, RAS, RVHT, atheromatous renal artery stenosis, renal artery fibrosing lesions, intimal fibroplasia, medial fibrosis with microaneurysms, subadventitial fibroplasia, fibromuscular hyperplasia, segmental mediolytic arteriopathy, renal ischemia, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone activation, arterial dysplasia, medial fibroplasia, MFP

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, Consultant Radiologist and Honorary Professor, North Manchester General Hospital Pennine Acute NHS Trust, UK
Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, British Medical Association, British Society of Interventional Radiology, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of the United States, Royal College of Radiologists, and Royal College of Surgeons of England
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute
Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Muhammad Sohaib, MBBS, MSc, Principal Medical Officer, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Sciences, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Shabana Saeed, MBBS, MSc, Head, Department of Medical Sciences, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences; Consulting Staff, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Joshua A Becker, MD, Professor, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine
Joshua A Becker, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Society of Uroradiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Eugene C Lin, MD, Consulting Radiologist, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.