eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Musculoskeletal

Acetabulum, Fractures

D Dean Thornton, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Musculoskeletal Radiologist, Radiology Associates of Birmingham, PC

Updated: Feb 11, 2009

Introduction

Background

Most acetabular fractures occur in the setting of significant trauma secondary to either a motor vehicle accident or a high-velocity fall. Blunt force is exerted on the femur, passes through the femoral head, and is transferred to the acetabulum. The direction and magnitude of the force, as well as the position of the femoral head, determine the pattern of acetabular injury. The determination of the pattern of injury is key to the classification of an acetabular fracture. Once the acetabular fracture is classified, appropriate therapy may be planned and implemented.^1,2,3,4,5

Acetabular fracture orientation with a computed tomography (CT) scan. A CT scan of the left acetabulum obtained at the level of the dome shows that transverse-type acetabular fractures have a vertical (sagittal) orientation. Column-type fractures have a horizontal (coronal) orientation.

Acetabular fracture orientation with a computed tomography (CT) scan. A CT scan of the left midacetabulum shows that wall fractures have an oblique orientation.

Pathophysiology

One function of the acetabulum is to provide a means of transferring weight-bearing forces from the appendicular skeleton to the axial skeleton via the acetabulum's articulation with the femoral head. The femoral head also transfers high-energy forces to the acetabulum in the setting of trauma. The pattern of acetabular injury is determined by the position of the femoral head at the time of the traumatic event. When the femoral head is rotated internally, the force is transferred to the posterior column. When the femoral head is rotated externally, the force is directed toward the anterior column. If the femoral head is adducted, the force is transmitted to the acetabular roof; if it is abducted, the force is directed inferiorly.

The direction of the force also determines which part of the acetabulum is injured. An anterior force applied to the femoral head is transmitted to the posterior wall and column. Conversely, a posterior force affects the anterior wall and column. A force to the lateral aspect of the femoral head is directed toward the medial wall of the acetabulum, often resulting in transverse acetabular fractures.

Frequency

United States

Table 1. Relative Frequency of Acetabular Fracture Types

* n = 567.

** n = 255.

† n = 85.

Mortality/Morbidity

• Associated injuries
  • Significant trauma is required to cause a fracture of the acetabulum. Therefore, acetabular fractures are most often observed in the setting of major trauma, in which injuries elsewhere in the body are common.
  • Intracranial, spinal, intrathoracic, and intra-abdominal injuries often are observed in conjunction with acetabular fractures.
  • Pelvic ring and extremity fractures also are common in patients with acetabular fractures.
  • Bladder injury and clinically significant pelvic hemorrhage are not routinely observed in the setting of acetabular fracture unless a concomitant pelvic ring injury also is present.
• Complications of acetabular fracture include the following:
  • Immediate posttraumatic complications include injuries to the sciatic,⁹ femoral, or superior gluteal nerves.
  • Immediate postsurgical complications include nerve injuries, such as sciatic,⁹ femoral, and superior gluteal nerve injuries; wound infection; and thromboembolic disease.
  • Late complications include heterotopic ossification,¹⁰ osteonecrosis (avascular necrosis) of the femoral head or acetabular fracture fragment, chondrolysis, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and acetabular implant failure.

Age

Elderly patients and persons with osteoporosis may occasionally have an acetabular fracture as a result of low-energy trauma, such as a fall from a standing height.

Anatomy

Lateral view of the left acetabulum. The left femur has been removed. The articular surface of the acetabulum is in the shape of an inverted horseshoe (outlined in red). The anterior column of the acetabulum includes most of the iliac wing, the anterior acetabulum, and the superior pubic ramus. The posterior column begins at the sciatic notch and includes the posterior portion of the acetabulum and the ischium.

The acetabulum is formed from 3 ossification centers; the ilium, ischium, and pubis each contribute to its development at the triradiate cartilage. The important anatomic components of the acetabulum are the columns, walls, dome, and quadrilateral plate. The acetabulum is divided into 2 columns: anterior and posterior. The 2 columns are described as having the shape of an inverted Y, or of the Greek letter lambda (l).

The anterior column is the larger of the 2 columns. It begins at the iliac wing and extends down the anterior portion of the acetabulum to incorporate the superior pubic ramus. The posterior column begins at the sciatic notch and extends down the posterior acetabulum into the ischium. Both columns are attached to the axial skeleton by the sciatic buttress, which connects the acetabulum to the sacroiliac joint. The column concept is appreciated more easily on the lateral view (see Image 1).

The posterior wall is larger than the anterior wall. The lateral portion of either wall is termed the acetabular rim. The walls help to stabilize the hip joint. The quadrilateral plate is the medial wall of the acetabulum. The dome of the acetabulum is the superior aspect that carries most of the weight-bearing forces. The obturator ring is an important landmark because some acetabular fractures spare the ring, whereas others disrupt it. The iliac wing is considered part of the anterior column.

Radiographic anatomy

The anteroposterior (AP) view of the pelvis is the primary tool for radiographic evaluation of the acetabulum (see Images 2-3). The iliopectineal, or iliopubic, line is the radiographic landmark for the anterior column. It begins at the sciatic notch and travels along the superior pubic ramus to the symphysis pubis. The ilioischial line demarcates the posterior column. It also begins at the sciatic notch, coursing inferiorly to the medial border of the ischium. The ilioischial line should pass through the acetabular teardrop. If it does not overlap the teardrop, the ilioischial line and, thus, the posterior column are disrupted.

The iliac wing is considered to be part of the anterior column. An iliac wing fracture in the setting of an acetabular injury indicates anterior column involvement. An iliac oblique radiograph provides a better view of the iliac wing. The posterior wall of the acetabulum is more visible than the anterior wall on the AP view because of its more lateral position. The anterior wall may be difficult to appreciate on the AP view. The obturator oblique view better depicts the posterior wall, and the iliac oblique view better depicts the anterior wall. The integrity of the obturator ring is an important feature to recognize. Certain fracture patterns (such as those of column and T-shaped fractures) characteristically include fractures through the obturator ring.

The oblique, or Judet, views of the pelvis are named relative to the side of interest (see Images 4-5). For example, if the acetabular fracture is on the left side, the views are named with reference to the left side. The left posterior oblique radiograph displays the iliac wing en face; therefore, this view is termed the left iliac oblique view. The right posterior oblique radiograph shows the obturator ring en face; therefore, this view is the left obturator oblique view. The iliac oblique view clearly demonstrates the iliac wing, sciatic notch, and ischial spine. In addition, the posterior column and anterior wall of the acetabulum are seen in profile. The obturator oblique radiograph provides the best depiction of the obturator ring and shows the anterior column and posterior wall in profile.

Presentation

Fractures of the acetabulum are most commonly classified according to the system described by Judet and colleagues.¹¹ The system is based on the orientation of the fractures and the structures involved. In this system, the orientation of the fracture is based on its depiction on a lateral view of the acetabulum. In order to arrive at the correct classification, AP and oblique (Judet) radiographs of the pelvis are obtained and analyzed. Some authors have questioned the necessity of oblique views of the pelvis in the age of multidetector CT scanning.¹²  Harris and colleagues have proposed a new classification system based on the multidetector CT scan appearance.^13,14 Other authors have defended the utility of the standard radiographic series in the evaluation of acetabular fractures.¹⁵ The Judet system will be presented in the remainder of this article.¹⁶

Acetabular fracture classification system. Judet and colleagues (1964) described the classification scheme that is most commonly used today. Of the 10 types, 5 are elementary fractures (top row), and 5 are associated fractures (bottom row). Elementary types involve 1 primary fracture plane. Associated types involve more than 1 fracture plane.

• Wall fractures
  • Anterior wall
  • Posterior wall
  • Posterior column with posterior wall (also a column fracture)
  • Transverse with posterior wall (also a transverse fracture)
• Column fractures
  • Anterior column
  • Posterior column
  • Both-column
  • Posterior column with posterior wall (also a wall fracture)
  • Anterior column with posterior hemitransverse (also a transverse fracture)
• Transverse fractures
  • Transverse
  • T-shaped
  • Transverse with posterior wall (also a wall fracture)
  • Anterior column with posterior hemitransverse (also a column fracture)

Fracture patterns

Posterior wall acetabular fracture. Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. The posterior wall of the left acetabulum is disrupted (arrow).

Posterior wall acetabular fracture. A left obturator oblique radiograph of the pelvis. The posterior wall fracture (arrow) is better depicted on this view than on the anteroposterior view.

Both-column acetabular fracture. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis shows that the right ilioischial and iliopectineal lines are completely disrupted. A right iliac wing fracture is noted above the level of the acetabulum (arrow). A nondisplaced fracture of the right inferior pubic ramus is subtle.

Both-column acetabular fracture. A right iliac oblique radiograph of the pelvis. The posterior column (arrowhead) and iliac wing disruptions are shown.

Both-column acetabular fracture. A right obturator oblique radiograph of the pelvis best depicts nondisplaced fractures of the obturator ring (arrowheads). The iliopectineal line disruption (short arrow) signifies anterior column involvement. The pathognomonic spur sign (long arrow) of the both-column fracture is best appreciated on this view. The spur represents a strut of bone extending from the sacroiliac joint. The fracture of both columns disconnects this piece of bone from the acetabulum and causes its spurlike appearance.

Anterior column fracture with a posterior hemitransverse acetabular fracture, as depicted on computed tomography (CT) scans obtained above and at the level of the right acetabulum. Left: The image shows an iliac wing fracture (arrow) that was not appreciated on the anteroposterior radiograph. (The oblique radiographs were not of good quality.) Middle: The image clearly depicts a column-type fracture (arrow) that is oriented horizontally on the CT scans. Right: The image again demonstrates the column fracture (long arrow), but now a transverse (vertically oriented) fracture can be seen posteriorly (short arrow).

• Commonly occurring acetabular fractures (90%)
  • Both-column
  • Transverse with posterior wall 
  • Posterior wall
  • T-shaped
  • Transverse
• Uncommonly occurring acetabular fractures (10%)
  • Anterior column
  • Anterior column with posterior hemitransverse
  • Posterior column with posterior wall
  • Posterior column
  • Anterior wall

Preferred Examination

AP radiography of the pelvis is used in the initial radiographic assessment of patients with major trauma that is suggestive of pelvic and/or acetabular injury (see Images 2-3).^17,18 Images are obtained with the patient in the supine position and with the radiographic beam passing in an AP direction. Abnormalities depicted on the AP pelvis radiograph direct the need for the next set of radiographs. Acetabular fractures are imaged by using oblique (ie, Judet) views of the pelvis. Pelvic ring fractures are imaged by using inlet and outlet views of the pelvis (see Pelvic Ring Fractures).

Anteroposterior view of the pelvis. The left femur has been removed for illustration purposes. The iliopectineal, or iliopubic, line is an important landmark for examining the anterior column of the acetabulum. The ilioischial line demarcates the medial border of the posterior column. The posterior wall of the acetabulum is larger and projects more laterally than does the anterior wall.

Anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the pelvis (compare with Image above). The iliopectineal (or iliopubic) and ilioischial lines serve as landmarks for the anterior and posterior columns, respectively. The larger and more lateral posterior wall is visualized more easily than is the smaller, more medial anterior wall. The acetabular tear figure is a composite shadow of the inferomedial structures that compose the acetabulum. The ilioischial line should pass through the teardrop on a true AP view of the pelvis.

Left obturator oblique view of the pelvis. The left obturator ring is seen en face. The anterior column and posterior wall of the left acetabulum are profiled in this position.

Left iliac oblique view of the pelvis. The left iliac wing is demonstrated en face. The left posterior column and the anterior wall are seen in profile.

Limitations of Techniques

Virtually all acetabular fractures may be correctly classified after careful interpretation of AP and oblique radiographs of the pelvis. Intra-articular fracture fragments may be difficult to recognize on radiographs.

Compared with radiography, pelvic CT scanning allows a more precise determination of the degree of articular involvement, as well as of fragment displacement and orientation. Pelvic CT scanning also permits the identification of intra-articular fracture fragments. In complex acetabular fractures, 3-dimensional reformatted images may help conceptualize the fracture pattern and, thereby, aid in the planning of orthopedic surgery.

Differential Diagnoses

Pelvic Ring Fractures
Pelvis, Insufficiency Fractures

Other Problems to Be Considered

Hip dislocation
Pelvic avulsion fracture

Radiography

Both-column acetabular fracture. A right obturator oblique radiograph of the pelvis best depicts nondisplaced fractures of the obturator ring (arrowheads). The iliopectineal line disruption (short arrow) signifies anterior column involvement. The pathognomonic spur sign (long arrow) of the both-column fracture is best appreciated on this view. The spur represents a strut of bone extending from the sacroiliac joint. The fracture of both columns disconnects this piece of bone from the acetabulum and causes its spurlike appearance.

Posterior wall acetabular fracture. Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. The posterior wall of the left acetabulum is disrupted (arrow).

Posterior wall acetabular fracture. A left obturator oblique radiograph of the pelvis. The posterior wall fracture (arrow) is better depicted on this view than on the anteroposterior view.

T-shaped acetabular fracture. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis shows that a transverse fracture (arrows) disrupts the left iliopectineal and ilioischial lines. The obturator ring also is interrupted (arrowheads). No iliac wing fracture is seen above the level of the acetabulum.

Findings

• Is a fracture of the obturator ring present? A fracture of the obturator ring indicates either a T-shaped or a column fracture (with the exception of the hemitransverse type of fracture). An intact obturator ring eliminates these fractures from consideration.
• Is the ilioischial line disrupted? Disruption of the ilioischial line occurs in fractures involving the posterior column or fractures in the transverse group.
• Is the iliopectineal line disrupted? Disruption of the iliopectineal line indicates anterior column involvement or 1 of the transverse-type fractures.
• Is the iliac wing above the acetabulum fractured? Iliac wing fractures are observed in fractures involving the anterior column.
• Is the posterior wall fractured? Posterior wall fractures may occur in isolation or in combination with posterior column or transverse fractures.
• Is the spur sign present? The spur sign is observed exclusively in the both-column fracture. The spur is a strut of bone extending from the sacroiliac joint. Usually, this strut of bone connects to the articular surface of the acetabulum. In the both-column fracture, this connection is disrupted; a fractured piece of bone that resembles a spur remains. The spur sign is best depicted on the obturator oblique view (see Image 26). In addition, the spur sign can be appreciated on CT scans (see Image 27).

Table 2 shows the combined set of radiographic and CT scan observations that are useful in acetabular fracture classification.

* N/A indicates not applicable.

Degree of Confidence

By using Brandser and Marsh's system, the accurate classification of acetabular fractures is possible in almost every patient.

False Positives/Negatives

An accessory ossification center, the os acetabulum, may mimic an acetabular wall fracture. Its differentiating features include its characteristic superolateral location and well-corticated margins. Fractures of the anterior puboacetabular junction may be observed in pelvic ring fractures. These fractures may extend into the anterior column of the acetabulum, but they are not anterior column fractures per se. Such fractures are more correctly considered to be superior pubic ramus fractures.

Computed Tomography

Acetabular fracture orientation with a computed tomography (CT) scan. A CT scan of the left acetabulum obtained at the level of the dome shows that transverse-type acetabular fractures have a vertical (sagittal) orientation. Column-type fractures have a horizontal (coronal) orientation.

Acetabular fracture orientation with a computed tomography (CT) scan. A CT scan of the left midacetabulum shows that wall fractures have an oblique orientation.

Computed tomography (CT) scan of a transverse fracture with a posterior wall acetabular fracture. The vertically oriented transverse fracture (arrow) of the left acetabulum is well depicted on CT scans. Note the oblique posterior wall fracture (arrowhead). Posterior wall fractures often are associated with femoral head dislocation.

Posterior column acetabular fracture. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained at the level of the midacetabulum shows the horizontally oriented column fracture. The femoral head is relocated, but the recent posterior dislocation is evident in the anterior impaction fracture (arrow).

Both-column acetabular fracture. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained just above the level of the acetabular dome shows that the CT scan spur sign is present (arrow).

Findings

Brandser and Marsh described several CT scan–based observations in the classification of acetabular fractures.²⁰ The answers to the following questions may help in the classification of these fractures:

• Does the fracture divide the acetabulum into top and bottom halves or into front and back halves? Transverse-type fractures divide the acetabulum into top and bottom halves, as seen from the lateral perspective of the acetabulum. Column fractures divide the acetabulum into front and back halves. Isolated wall fractures do not divide the acetabulum.
• Can an intact strut of bone be followed from the sacroiliac joint to the acetabular articular surface? In other words, is the CT scan spur sign present? Only the both-column fracture causes the spur sign.
• What is the orientation of the major fracture line on CT scans? Transverse-type fractures have a vertical (sagittal) CT scan orientation. Column fractures have a horizontal (coronal) orientation. Wall fractures are oriented obliquely.

Table 2 shows the combined set of radiographic and CT scan observations that are useful in acetabular fracture classification.

Durkee and colleagues presented an algorithm for classification of the 5 most common types of acetabular fracture based on several observations.³ The observations are similar to those presented in Table 2.^21,22,4

Degree of Confidence

Interpreted in conjunction with the pelvic radiographs, CT scans allow accurate fracture classification and appropriate surgical planning.

False Positives/Negatives

False findings can occur (see Radiograph Findings).

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Findings

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely used in the primary evaluation of acetabular fractures. Potter and colleagues described the use of MRI in the evaluation of occult femoral head injuries and in the detection of subclinical sciatic nerve injury.²³ Intra-articular fracture fragments may be missed on magnetic resonance images.

Currently, the use of MRI in imaging deep venous thrombosis in patients with pelvic or lower extremity injuries is being evaluated. Magnetic resonance venography may be useful in depicting lower extremity and pelvic venous thrombosis.^24,25,26

Ultrasonography

Findings

Ultrasonography is not used to evaluate acetabular fractures. Lower extremity Doppler ultrasonography is used to assess lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Multimedia

Media file 1: Lateral view of the left acetabulum. The left femur has been removed. The articular surface of the acetabulum is in the shape of an inverted horseshoe (outlined in red). The anterior column of the acetabulum includes most of the iliac wing, the anterior acetabulum, and the superior pubic ramus. The posterior column begins at the sciatic notch and includes the posterior portion of the acetabulum and the ischium.

Media file 2: Anteroposterior view of the pelvis. The left femur has been removed for illustration purposes. The iliopectineal, or iliopubic, line is an important landmark for examining the anterior column of the acetabulum. The ilioischial line demarcates the medial border of the posterior column. The posterior wall of the acetabulum is larger and projects more laterally than does the anterior wall.

Media file 3: Anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the pelvis (compare with Image above). The iliopectineal (or iliopubic) and ilioischial lines serve as landmarks for the anterior and posterior columns, respectively. The larger and more lateral posterior wall is visualized more easily than is the smaller, more medial anterior wall. The acetabular tear figure is a composite shadow of the inferomedial structures that compose the acetabulum. The ilioischial line should pass through the teardrop on a true AP view of the pelvis.

Media file 4: Left obturator oblique view of the pelvis. The left obturator ring is seen en face. The anterior column and posterior wall of the left acetabulum are profiled in this position.

Media file 5: Left iliac oblique view of the pelvis. The left iliac wing is demonstrated en face. The left posterior column and the anterior wall are seen in profile.

Media file 6: Acetabular fracture classification system. Judet and colleagues (1964) described the classification scheme that is most commonly used today. Of the 10 types, 5 are elementary fractures (top row), and 5 are associated fractures (bottom row). Elementary types involve 1 primary fracture plane. Associated types involve more than 1 fracture plane.

Media file 7: Acetabular fracture orientation with a computed tomography (CT) scan. A CT scan of the left acetabulum obtained at the level of the dome shows that transverse-type acetabular fractures have a vertical (sagittal) orientation. Column-type fractures have a horizontal (coronal) orientation.

Media file 8: Acetabular fracture orientation with a computed tomography (CT) scan. A CT scan of the left midacetabulum shows that wall fractures have an oblique orientation.

Media file 9: Anterior wall acetabular fracture. A computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrates an oblique fracture through the anterior wall of the left acetabulum (arrow). Such fractures are uncommon in isolation. The patient had other pelvic injuries.

Media file 10: Posterior wall acetabular fracture. Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. The posterior wall of the left acetabulum is disrupted (arrow).

Media file 11: Posterior wall acetabular fracture. A left obturator oblique radiograph of the pelvis. The posterior wall fracture (arrow) is better depicted on this view than on the anteroposterior view.

Media file 12: Computed tomography (CT) scan of a posterior wall acetabular fracture. The oblique fracture of the left acetabulum is clearly depicted. The degree of displacement and marginal impaction can be determined more accurately with CT scanning than with radiography.

Media file 13: Transverse with posterior wall acetabular fracture. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis shows that the central dislocation of the left femoral head results in the disruption of the iliopectineal and ilioischial lines. In addition, the left posterior acetabular wall is disrupted.

Media file 14: Transverse fracture with a posterior wall acetabular fracture. Compared with the anteroposterior view, this left obturator oblique view of the pelvis view better demonstrates the anterior column and posterior wall disruption. The obturator ring is intact.

Media file 15: Computed tomography (CT) scan of a transverse fracture with a posterior wall acetabular fracture. The vertically oriented transverse fracture (arrow) of the left acetabulum is well depicted on CT scans. Note the oblique posterior wall fracture (arrowhead). Posterior wall fractures often are associated with femoral head dislocation.

Media file 16: T-shaped acetabular fracture. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis shows that a transverse fracture (arrows) disrupts the left iliopectineal and ilioischial lines. The obturator ring also is interrupted (arrowheads). No iliac wing fracture is seen above the level of the acetabulum.

Media file 17: Computed tomography (CT) scan of T-shaped acetabular fracture. The transverse portion of the fracture has a vertical (sagittal) orientation (arrow). The extension of the fracture through the medial wall represents the stem of the T (arrowhead). More inferior CT scans demonstrated the obturator ring fractures.

Media file 18: Posterior column acetabular fracture. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis shows that the left femoral head is dislocated posteriorly. The ilioischial line is broken, but the iliopectineal line remains intact.

Media file 19: Posterior column acetabular fracture. Compared with the anteroposterior view, the left obturator oblique radiograph of the pelvis better depicts the posteriorly displaced posterior column, posterior wall, and femoral head.

Media file 20: Posterior column acetabular fracture. A left iliac oblique radiograph of the pelvis shows that the posterior column is markedly displaced.

Media file 21: Computed tomography (CT) scan of a posterior column acetabular fracture at the level of the acetabular dome. The characteristic horizontal (coronal) orientation of the column fracture is appreciated easily by using CT scanning.

Media file 22: Posterior column acetabular fracture. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained at the level of the midacetabulum shows the horizontally oriented column fracture. The femoral head is relocated, but the recent posterior dislocation is evident in the anterior impaction fracture (arrow).

Media file 23: Posterior column acetabular fracture. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained at the level of the ischial tuberosities shows that posterior column fractures sometimes can exit through the ischial tuberosity (arrow) rather than through the obturator ring.

Media file 24: Both-column acetabular fracture. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis shows that the right ilioischial and iliopectineal lines are completely disrupted. A right iliac wing fracture is noted above the level of the acetabulum (arrow). A nondisplaced fracture of the right inferior pubic ramus is subtle.

Media file 25: Both-column acetabular fracture. A right iliac oblique radiograph of the pelvis. The posterior column (arrowhead) and iliac wing disruptions are shown.

Media file 26: Both-column acetabular fracture. A right obturator oblique radiograph of the pelvis best depicts nondisplaced fractures of the obturator ring (arrowheads). The iliopectineal line disruption (short arrow) signifies anterior column involvement. The pathognomonic spur sign (long arrow) of the both-column fracture is best appreciated on this view. The spur represents a strut of bone extending from the sacroiliac joint. The fracture of both columns disconnects this piece of bone from the acetabulum and causes its spurlike appearance.

Media file 27: Both-column acetabular fracture. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained at the level of the sacroiliac joints shows that the horizontal (coronal) column fracture begins superiorly at the iliac wing in the both-column fracture. The CT scan equivalent of the spur sign can be seen (arrow).

Media file 28: Both-column acetabular fracture. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained just above the level of the acetabular dome shows that the CT scan spur sign is present (arrow).

Media file 29: Both-column acetabular fracture. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained at the level of the acetabular dome shows the CT scan spur sign (arrow). Note how this spur does not connect to the articular portion of the acetabulum. In a both-column fracture, the articular surface of the acetabulum is completely disconnected from the axial skeleton.

Media file 30: Anterior column fracture with a posterior hemitransverse acetabular fracture. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis shows disruption of the iliopectineal (long arrow) and ilioischial (short arrows) lines. The obturator ring is intact.

Media file 31: Anterior column fracture with a posterior hemitransverse acetabular fracture, as depicted on computed tomography (CT) scans obtained above and at the level of the right acetabulum. Left: The image shows an iliac wing fracture (arrow) that was not appreciated on the anteroposterior radiograph. (The oblique radiographs were not of good quality.) Middle: The image clearly depicts a column-type fracture (arrow) that is oriented horizontally on the CT scans. Right: The image again demonstrates the column fracture (long arrow), but now a transverse (vertically oriented) fracture can be seen posteriorly (short arrow).

References

1. Hunter JC, Brandser EA, Tran KA. Pelvic and Acetabular Trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;35:559-590. [Medline].

2. Young JW. Pelvic Injuries. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 1998;2(1):83-104. [Medline].

3. Durkee NJ, Jacobson J, Jamadar D, Karunakar MA, Morag Y, Hayes C. Classification of common acetabular fractures: radiographic and CT appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 2006;187(4):915-25. [Medline].

4. Olson SA. CT-based acetabular fracture classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 2005;185(1):277-8; author reply 278-80. [Medline]. [Full Text].

5. Lovric I, Jovanovic S, Leksan I, et al. Functional status of hip joint after surgical and conservative treatment of acetabular fracture. Coll Antropol. Mar 2007;31(1):285-9. [Medline].

6. Letournel E. Fractures of the Acetabulum. 2^nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1993.

7. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Nov 1996;78(11):1632-45. [Medline].

8. Dakin GJ, Eberhardt AW, Alonso JE, et al. Acetabular fracture patterns: associations with motor vehicle crash information. J Trauma. Dec 1999;47(6):1063-71. [Medline].

9. Issack PS, Toro JB, Buly RL, et al. Sciatic nerve release following fracture or reconstructive surgery of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 2007;89(7):1432-7. [Medline].

10. [Best Evidence] Karunakar MA, Sen A, Bosse MJ, et al. Indometacin as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification after the operative treatment of fractures of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Dec 2006;88(12):1613-7. [Medline].

11. Harris JH Jr, Lee JS, Coupe KJ, et al. Acetabular fractures revisited: part 1, redefinition of the Letournel anterior column. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2004;182(6):1363-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

12. Judet R, Judet J. [Fractures of the acetabulum]. Acta Orthop Belg. May-Jun 1966;32(3):469-76. [Medline].

13. Pitt MJ, Ruth JT, Benjamin JB. Trauma to the pelvic ring and acetabulum. Semin Roentgenol. Oct 1992;27(4):299-318. [Medline].

14. Tile M. Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. 2^nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.

15. Tile M. Fractures of the acetabulum. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, et al, eds. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 4^th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; Lippincott-Raven Pub:1996.

16. Brandser EA, El-Khoury GY, Marsh JL. Acetabular fractures: a systematic approach to classification. Emerg Radiol. 1995;2:18-28.

17. Borrelli J Jr, Peelle M, McFarland E, Evanoff B, Ricci WM. Computer-reconstructed radiographs are as good as plain radiographs for assessment of acetabular fractures. Am J Orthop. Sep 2008;37(9):455-9; discussion 460. [Medline].

18. Citak M, Gardner MJ, Kendoff D, Tarte S, Krettek C, Nolte LP, et al. Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture reduction. J Orthop Res. Apr 2008;26(4):547-52. [Medline].

19. Brandser E, Marsh JL. Acetabular fractures: easier classification with a systematic approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Nov 1998;171(5):1217-28. [Medline].

20. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Matta JM. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 2003;85-A(9):1704-9. [Medline].

21. Harris JH Jr, Coupe KJ, Lee JS, Trotscher T. Acetabular fractures revisited: part 2, a new CT-based classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2004;182(6):1367-75. [Medline].

22. Ohashi K, El-Khoury GY, Abu-Zahra KW, Berbaum KS. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?. Radiology. Nov 2006;241(2):386-91. [Medline].

23. Potter HG, Montgomery KD, Heise CW, et al. MR imaging of acetabular fractures: value in detecting femoral head injury, intraarticular fragments, and sciatic nerve injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 1994;163(4):881-6. [Medline].

24. Cabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y, Link TM. MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 2008;191(4):995-1001. [Medline].

25. Hong RJ, Hughes TH, Gentili A, Chung CB. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip. J Magn Reson Imaging. Mar 2008;27(3):435-45. [Medline].

26. Kwon JW, Huh SJ, Yoon YC, Choi SH, Jung JY, Oh D, et al. Pelvic bone complications after radiation therapy of uterine cervical cancer: evaluation with MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 2008;191(4):987-94. [Medline].

Keywords

acetabulum fracture, acetabulum trauma, acetabular trauma, femur trauma, femoral trauma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

D Dean Thornton, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Musculoskeletal Radiologist, Radiology Associates of Birmingham, PC
D Dean Thornton, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Skeletal Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Michael A Bruno, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine; Director, Radiology Quality Management Services, Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine
Michael A Bruno, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America, Society of Nuclear Medicine, and Society of Skeletal Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

William R Reinus, MD, MBA, FACR, Professor of Radiology, Temple University; Chief of Musculoskeletal and Trauma Radiology, Vice Chair, Department of Radiology, Temple University Hospital
William R Reinus, MD, MBA, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, and Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM, Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Clinical Guidelines and Trials:

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® developmental dysplasia of the hip. American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society.  1999 (revised 2005).  8 pages.  NGC:004788

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® imaging after total hip arthroplasty (THA). American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society.  1998 (revised 2005).  8 pages.  NGC:004649

Periacetabular Osteotomy.A Prospective Study With Reference to Cartilage, Migration and Bone Density

Role of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) Device in Postoperative Management of Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures

Unipolar or Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures. A Randomized Trial of RSA Measurements of Acetabular Wear

Acetabular Fractures of Both Columns

A Clinical Investigation of the C2a-Taper™ Acetabular System

Clinical Study Evaluating an Acetabular Cup System After Total Hip Replacement

Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System

The Influence of "Operating Table Position Simulating Radiographs" on Acetabular Cup Angle During Primary Total Hip Replacement

Evaluation of Acetabular Perfusion After Ganz Osteotomy by Positron Emission Tomography

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)