Liposarcoma Imaging
- Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR; Chief Editor: Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM more...
Overview
Liposarcoma is a malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin in which the bulk of the tumor differentiates into adipose tissue. Liposarcoma is a common neoplasm of the soft tissues, and it affects middle-aged patients. Commonly affected sites include the thigh, gluteal region, retroperitoneum, leg, and shoulder area.
Liposarcomas rarely arise from a preexisting lipoma. The clinical presentation depends on the site of the tumors, most of which are palpable masses. The radiologic characteristics of liposarcomas are demonstrated in the images below.
Computed tomography (CT) scan of a left thigh shows a huge mass (arrows) with predominant fat attenuation. The central soft-tissue component (asterisk) and thick, internal septations are consistent with liposarcoma.
A 67-year-old man presented with a slowly growing mass on the left side of his groin and with mild left leg claudication. The patient was a nonsmoker and was not diabetic. T1-weighted, coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a 5-cm, low–signal-intensity, lobulated mass in the left upper thigh.
Magnetic resonance (MR) angiogram of the leg vessels in a 67-year-old man who presented with a slowly growing mass on the left side of his groin and with mild left leg claudication. The image shows medial displacement and compression of the left femoral artery, superficial femoral artery, and profunda by the tumor, which resulted in the claudication. In general, the more aggressive tumors demonstrate more radiopacity, whereas well-differentiated tumors have a greater fat content. Liposarcomas are the most radiosensitive soft-tissue tumors.
Preferred examination
Computed tomography (CT) scanning plays an important role in the preoperative evaluation of lipomatous and myxoid tumors of the soft tissue.[1] Besides providing valuable morphologic information, CT scan findings help to some extent in the differentiation of various types of lipomatous tumors. Well-differentiated liposarcomas may be distinguished from other types of tumors on the basis of their largely lipomatous appearance.
Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important in differentiating myxoid liposarcomas from benign cystic tumors.
Findings in plain radiography are nonspecific, and the modality usually offers little except perhaps aid in confirming the presence of a soft-tissue mass. Frequently, fat is not detectable radiologically. Ultrasonography is helpful in confirming the presence of a mass when doubt exists. The use of radionuclides has been anecdotal, but imaging with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning holds promise.[2, 3]
Limitations of techniques
Well-differentiated tumors are easily characterized as fat-containing masses, although differentiation between a malignant tumor and a benign one may not be possible. Poorly differentiated tumors may be indistinguishable from other mesothelial tumors, lymphomas, metastases, and inflammatory masses.
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, leiomyosarcoma, and desmoid tumors may have a CT scan appearance that is indistinguishable from that of liposarcoma, particularly liposarcoma of the myxoid, mixed myxoid and round cell, round cell, or pleomorphic type.
Because myxoid tissue is present in many benign and malignant tumors, MRI may not enable a specific diagnosis of a liposarcoma. Moreover, any lesion consisting of edema, an extracellular matrix with a high level of mucopolysaccharide, hyaline cartilage content, and necrosis may appear cystic on MRI scans.
Radiography
Radiographic findings are seldom diagnostic, and the images may demonstrate a nonspecific soft-tissue mass. Frequently, no fat is detectable. Rarely, calcification (seen in the image below) is present.
A plain radiograph of a left femur demonstrates a large, soft-tissue mass projected over the medial aspect of the thigh (arrowheads). Small areas of radiolucency (asterisk) and calcification (arrow) are shown. Abdominal radiographs in patients with retroperitoneal tumors may reveal a soft-tissue–displacing, gas-filled structure and effacement of the normal fat planes.
Contrast-enhanced studies of the gastrointestinal tract may show displacement of the stomach, small bowel, or colon, depending on the location of the tumor.
Intravenous urography may show renal or ureteric displacement; rarely, hydronephrosis is demonstrated.
Degree of confidence
The sensitivity and specificity of radiographs are low in liposarcoma.
False positives/negatives
Inflammatory masses and other types of benign and malignant tumors can have a similar appearance.
Computed Tomography
CT scans demonstrate 3 distinct patterns in liposarcomas, as follows:
- An enhancing, solid, inhomogeneous, poorly defined, infiltrating mass
- A mixed-pattern tumor with foci of fat interspersed in high-attenuating tissue
- A pseudocystic water-density tumor.
Liposarcomas of the myxoid type, the mixed myxoid and round cell type, the round cell type, and the pleomorphic type are usually poorly defined, with attenuation values of 12-38 HU and varying degrees of contrast enhancement.[4, 5] Calcification is detectable in as many as 12% of the tumors.
Occasionally, the mass may appear inhomogeneous, with areas of low-attenuating, fatty components.[6, 7] Fatty components may be demonstrated better with planar tomography.
The CT-scan characteristics of liposarcomas are demonstrated below.
Computed tomography (CT) scan of a left thigh shows a huge mass (arrows) with predominant fat attenuation. The central soft-tissue component (asterisk) and thick, internal septations are consistent with liposarcoma.
A 50-year-old man presented with a 6-month history of a dull ache over the right hypochondrium. An ultrasonogram (not shown) depicted a poorly defined, infiltrating, echogenic mass in the right hepatic lobe with shadowing. A nonenhanced, axial computed tomography (CT) scan shows a low–fat-attenuating mass under the diaphragm; the mass displaces the liver to the left.
Contrast-enhanced, axial computed tomography (CT) scan of an abdomen demonstrates a huge, intra-abdominal, fatty mass with a soft-tissue component (arrow) and thick septations. The mass displaces the descending colon and the left kidney posteriorly. Degree of confidence
CT scanning plays an important role in the preoperative evaluation of lipomatous and myxoid tumors of the soft tissue.[8, 9] Besides providing valuable morphologic information, CT scanning helps to some extent in differentiating various types of lipomatous tumors.[10, 11] CT scanning is useful in the determination of the tumoral response to radiation therapy or chemotherapy; it is also invaluable in the detection of tumor recurrence.
False positives/negatives
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, leiomyosarcoma, and desmoid tumors may have an appearance that is indistinguishable from that of liposarcoma, particularly liposarcoma of the myxoid, mixed myxoid and round cell, round cell, or pleomorphic type.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Most liposarcomas appear well defined on MRI scans, mostly with lobulated margins.[12, 13] Well-differentiated liposarcomas are made up primarily of fat and have septations or nodules; these neoplasms are hyperintense on T2-weighted images.[4, 14, 15] After the administration of contrast material, well-differentiated liposarcomas may enhance minimally or not at all. (See the images below.)
A 67-year-old man presented with a slowly growing mass on the left side of his groin and with mild left leg claudication. The patient was a nonsmoker and was not diabetic. T1-weighted, coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a 5-cm, low–signal-intensity, lobulated mass in the left upper thigh.
T2-weighted, coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the left upper thigh in a 67-year-old man who presented with a slowly growing mass on the left side of his groin and with mild left leg claudication. The image shows a high–signal-intensity, lobulated, septate mass in the region of the groin.
Contrast-enhanced, axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the upper thigh in a 67-year-old man who presented with a slowly growing mass on the left side of his groin and with mild left leg claudication. The image shows fairly intense tumor enhancement.
Short-tau inversion recovery, turbo spin-echo, axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the left upper thigh in a 67-year-old man who presented with a slowly growing mass on the left side of his groin and with mild left leg claudication. The image shows fluid signal intensity within the tumor.
Sagittal, T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in a 32-year-old woman presenting with a palpable mass above the left popliteal fossa. The image shows a low–signal-intensity, lobulated mass in the region of the Hunter canal.
Axial, T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in a 32-year-old woman obtained through a palpable mass above the left popliteal fossa. The image shows a low–signal-intensity, lobulated mass.
Axial, T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in a 32-year-old woman presenting with a palpable mass above the left popliteal fossa. The image shows a high–signal-intensity, lobulated mass.
Fat-saturated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan through the tumor in a 32-year-old woman presenting with a palpable mass above the left popliteal fossa. The image shows fluid signal intensity within the mass.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (coronal, T1-weighted image and axial, T1-weighted image with fat saturation) show a soft-tissue mass of the posterior aspect of a thigh. It has a predominantly low T1 signal intensity except in its inferior portion, which has a high T1 signal intensity isointense to subcutaneous fat. Complete suppression is shown on the axial, T1-weighted image with fat saturation (asterisk). A spectrum of abnormal MRI findings may occur in the myxoid type, depending on the quantity of fat and myxoid material that is present, on the degree of cellularity and vascularity, and on whether or not necrosis exists.[16] Most myxoid tumors have linear or lacy, amorphous foci of fat.[17] Some myxoid tumors may appear cystic on nonenhanced MRI scans, but they are usually enhancing after the administration of contrast agents.[18]
Pleomorphic tumors show a markedly heterogeneous internal structure and moderate contrast enhancement. The malignancy grade is believed to increase in parallel with tumor heterogeneity and contrast enhancement.
Degree of confidence
Well-differentiated liposarcomas may be distinguished from other types of tumors on the basis of their largely lipomatous appearance.[19, 20] Gadolinium-enhanced imaging is important in differentiating myxoid liposarcomas from benign cystic tumors.
Gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist], gadobenate dimeglumine [MultiHance], gadodiamide [Omniscan], gadoversetamide [OptiMARK], gadoteridol [ProHance]) have recently been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). For more information, see the eMedicine topic Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis. The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) scans.
As of late December 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had received reports of 90 such cases. Worldwide, over 200 cases have been reported, according to the FDA. NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble moving or straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness. For more information, see Medscape.
False positives/negatives
Myxoid tissue is present in many benign and malignant tumors, including extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas, intramuscular myxomas, ganglia, and myxoid, malignant fibrous histiocytomas, in addition to myxoid liposarcomas. Any lesion consisting of edema, an extracellular matrix with a high level of mucopolysaccharide, hyaline cartilage content, and necrosis may appear cystic on MRI scans.
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography is helpful in confirming the presence of a mass.[21, 22] Liposarcomas are usually hyperechoic. Retroperitoneal liposarcomas are highly reflective, although this feature may be absent when the tumor is poorly differentiated.
The finding of a solid retroperitoneal mass that demonstrates a heterogeneous echo pattern with an echo-poor center usually suggests a sarcoma. The central echo-poor area is usually the result of hemorrhage or necrosis (because the tumors tend to outgrow their blood supply).
A well-differentiated, peripheral liposarcoma is usually hyperechoic and may be indistinguishable from a lipoma; however, Doppler ultrasonography studies reveal that a liposarcoma is more vascular than a lipoma.[23]
The remaining 3 varieties of liposarcoma appear as a heterogeneous soft-tissue mass with no distinguishing characteristics.
Degree of confidence
Confirming the retroperitoneal origin of a tumor is not always possible with ultrasonography. However, some characteristic features may be helpful in locating the tumor's origin. These include anterior displacement of the pancreas, abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava, kidneys, and ascending or descending colon. The benign or malignant nature of retroperitoneal tumors cannot be determined by using ultrasonography.
False positives/negatives
Vascular tumors, such as hemangiopericytomas, can be highly reflective, presumably because of the numerous tissue interfaces with multiple vascular walls. Distinguishing poorly differentiated liposarcomas from other types of retroperitoneal or peripheral masses is not always possible. A peripheral, well-differentiated liposarcoma may have the appearance of a lipoma.
Nuclear Imaging
It appears that gallium-67 (67 Ga) scanning can play an important part in the evaluation of patients presenting with a primary or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma, according to a study by Imaeda et al. In the investigation,67 Ga citrate scintigraphy scanning was evaluated in 90 patients with soft-tissue tumors of the limbs. Positive findings were found in 78% of patients with malignant tumors, 25% of patients with benign lesions, and 31% of patients with other types of lesions. Distinguishing liposarcoma from lipoma appeared to be possible by means of a67 Ga scan, according to the authors.[24]
67 Ga scanning may also have a role in imaging liposarcoma recurrence.[25]
A study of 78 patients with malignant soft-tissue sarcoma who were evaluated with thallium-201 (201 Tl) chloride revealed a radionuclide sensitivity of 81%.[26] Another study showed that technetium-99m (99m Tc) pertechnetate can potentially aid in the localization of malignant soft-tissue tumors and may be useful in their evaluation.[27, 28]
A study demonstrated that99m Tc bleomycin and99m Tc pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid (99m Tc[V]-DMSA) scanning can better localize liposarcomas than can67 Ga imaging.[29]
Angiography
Liposarcomas are usually hypovascular to moderately vascular, and they displace major vessels, particularly the inferior vena cava.[30] Moderately hypervascular liposarcomas may show irregular, fine tumor vessels and areas of tumor stain (as in the images below). Venous filling may occur early, and the veins may be dilated and tortuous. Displacement of the kidneys and arteries is seen in all except very small retroperitoneal tumors.
Moderately hypervascular tumor in the right upper thigh shows irregular, fine tumor vessels and areas of tumor stain.
Moderately hypervascular tumor in the right upper thigh shows irregular, fine tumor vessels and areas of tumor stain. Degree of confidence
Angiography may be useful for preoperative planning, intra-arterial infusion, and/or transcatheter embolization.
False positives/negatives
Angiography cannot help in the differentiation of liposarcomas from other types of sarcomas. Benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors can be avascular.
Crone-Munzebrock W, Baake S, Thoma G, et al. Comparison of computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography of preoperative evaluation of soft-tissue tumors of the limbs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1985;104(5):319-24. [Medline].
Kern KA, Brunetti A, Norton JA, et al. Metabolic imaging of human extremity musculoskeletal tumors by PET. J Nucl Med. Feb 1988;29(2):181-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Okazumi S, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Schwarzbach MH, Strauss LG. Quantitative, dynamic 18F-FDG-PET for the evaluation of soft tissue sarcomas: relation to differential diagnosis, tumor grading and prediction of prognosis. Hell J Nucl Med. Sep-Dec 2009;12(3):223-8. [Medline].
Kim T, Murakami T, Oi H, et al. CT and MR imaging of abdominal liposarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1996;166(4):829-33. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Lindahl S, Markhede G, Berlin O. Computed tomography of lipomatous and myxoid tumors. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). Nov-Dec 1985;26(6):709-13. [Medline].
Coleman BG, Mulhern CB, Arger PH, et al. New observations of soft tissue sarcomas with contrast medium-enhanced computed tomography. J Comput Tomogr. Jul 1985;9(3):187-93. [Medline].
Hunter JC, Johnston WH, Genant HK. Computed tomography evaluation of fatty tumors of the somatic soft tissues: clinical utility and radiologic-pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. Jun 6 1979;4(2):79-91. [Medline].
Levine E. Computed tomography of musculoskeletal tumors. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1981;16(4):279-309. [Medline].
Noble JL, Moskovic E, Fisher C, Judson I. Imaging of skeletal metastases in myxoid liposarcoma. Sarcoma. 2010;2010:262361. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Wang LJ, Wong YC, Chen CJ, et al. Computerized tomography characteristics that differentiate angiomyolipomas from liposarcomas in the perinephric space. J Urol. Feb 2002;167(2 Pt 1):490-3. [Medline].
Egund N, Ekelund L, Sako M, et al. CT of soft-tissue tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 1981;137(4):725-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Watt AJ, McMillan N. Multiple symmetric lipomatosis--MR appearances. Clin Radiol. Nov 1999;54(11):778-80. [Medline].
Kind M, Stock N, Coindre JM. Histology and imaging of soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Radiol. Oct 2009;72(1):6-15. [Medline].
Arkun R, Memis A, Akalin T, et al. Liposarcoma of soft tissue: MRI findings with pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. Mar 1997;26(3):167-72. [Medline].
Kumagai K, Tomita M, Nozaki Y, Sugiyama K, Abe K, Uetani M. MRI findings of an inflammatory variant of well-differentiated liposarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. May 2010;39(5):491-4. [Medline].
Sung MS, Kang HS, Suh JS, et al. Myxoid liposarcoma: appearance at MR imaging with histologic correlation. Radiographics. Jul-Aug 2000;20(4):1007-19. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Matsumoto K, Takada M, Okabe H, et al. Foci of signal intensities different from fat in well-differentiated liposarcoma and lipoma: correlation between MR and histological findings. Clin Imaging. Jan-Feb 2000;24(1):38-43. [Medline].
Elsayes KM, Staveteig PT, Narra VR, et al. Retroperitoneal masses: magnetic resonance imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. May-Jun 2007;36(3):97-106. [Medline].
Kransdorf MJ, Jelinek JS, Moser RP Jr, et al. Soft-tissue masses: diagnosis using MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 1989;153(3):541-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Jaovisidha S, Suvikapakornkul Y, Woratanarat P, Subhadrabandhu T, Nartthanarung A, Siriwongpairat P. MR imaging of fat-containing tumours: the distinction between lipoma and liposarcoma. Singapore Med J. May 2010;51(5):418-23. [Medline].
Bowie JD, Bernstein JR. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: ultrasound findings and case report. J Clin Ultrasound. Dec 1976;4(6):435-7. [Medline].
Ulivi M, Leonardi M, Balconi G, et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. Mar 1986;12(1):109-15. [Medline].
Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Chiu SY, Wang HK, Chen WM, Chen TH, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant superficial soft-tissue masses using grayscale and color doppler ultrasonography. J Chin Med Assoc. Jun 2009;72(6):307-15. [Medline].
Imaeda T, Seki M, Sone Y, et al. Gallium-67 citrate scintigraphy in the pre-operative evaluation of soft tissue tumors of the extremities. Ann Nucl Med. Nov 1991;5(4):127-32. [Medline].
Southee AE, Kaplan WD, Jochelson MS, et al. Gallium imaging in metastatic and recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma. J Nucl Med. Sep 1992;33(9):1594-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Terui S, Terauchi T, Abe H, et al. On clinical usefulness of Tl-201 scintigraphy for the management of malignant soft tissue tumors. Ann Nucl Med. Feb 1994;8(1):55-64. [Medline].
Abe H, Terui S, Terauchi T, et al. Comparison of Tc-99m pertechnetate with Tl-201 and Ga-67 scintigraphy of malignant soft-tissue tumors. Clin Nucl Med. Jan 1997;22(1):38-41. [Medline].
Otsuka N, Fukunaga M, Morita K, et al. Uptake of technetium-99m DTPA in retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Radiat Med. May-Jun 1990;8(3):88-91. [Medline].
Ohta H, Shane FI, Endo K, et al. Images of liposarcoma using technetium-99m bleomycin and technetium (V)-99m DMSA. Clin Nucl Med. Dec 1986;11(12):842-4. [Medline].
Lois JF, Fischer HJ, Deutsch LS, et al. Angiography in soft tissue sarcomas. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1984;7(6):309-16. [Medline].

