Imaging in Neuropathic Arthropathy (Charcot Joint) 

  • Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR; Chief Editor: Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM   more...
 
Updated: May 27, 2011
 

Overview

Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) can be defined as bone and joint changes that occur secondary to loss of sensation and that accompany a variety of disorders. Charcot first described the relationship between loss of sensation and arthropathy in 1868. The radiographic changes of this condition include destruction of articular surfaces, opaque subchondral bones, joint debris, deformity, and dislocation (see the images below). Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) poses a special problem in imaging when it is associated with a soft-tissue infection.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). NeuropathNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Neuropathic arthropathy of the shoulder in a patient with syringomyelia. Note the destruction of the articular surface, dislocation, and debris, which are pathognomonic for a neuropathic joint. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). OsteolysiNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Osteolysis of the distal metatarsals and phalanges with tapering results in a pencil-like appearance in the late stage of diabetic neuropathy.

Leprosy is one of many causes of neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint); joint manifestations of this disease include signs of Charcot disease, which advances despite treatment.[8] Neuropathic arthropathy related to diabetes, syphilis, leprosy, and connective tissue disorders is more common in the elderly population. Neuroarthropathy related to asymbolia, spina bifida, and spinal trauma is more common in young individuals. Sensory impairment associated with spina bifida and myelomeningocele is the most frequent cause of neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) in childhood.

Neuropathic arthropathy can be classified into hypertrophic and atrophic types. Hypertrophic changes predominate in the upper motor neuron lesions, and atrophic changes occur in peripheral nerve injuries. The early stage of osteoarthritis simulates neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint), both radiologically and pathologically.

Progressive joint effusion, fracture, fragmentation, and subluxation should raise the suspicion of neuroarthropathy. In the advanced stage, abnormal findings on radiographs include subchondral sclerosis, osteophytosis, subluxation, and soft-tissue swelling. Long-standing neuroarthropathy is characterized by disorganization of joints. The finding of considerable amounts of cartilaginous and osseous debris within the synovial membrane (termed detritic synovitis) should alert the pathologist that the changes may represent a neuropathic joint. Other causes of detritic synovitis include osteonecrosis, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease, psoriatic arthritis, osteoarthritis, and osteolysis with detritic synovitis.

Preferred examination

Radiography may be the only imaging required for the diagnosis of neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). In the appropriate clinical setting, a fairly accurate diagnosis can be achieved. The roles of ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) scanning are limited; however, these 2 modalities can be helpful in identifying any local collection, and they can be used to guide aspiration cytology. The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radionuclide scanning is to differentiate soft-tissue infection from osteomyelitis.[9, 10]

Limitation of techniques

Radiographic findings in the early stages of neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) may simulate osteoarthritis. Radiographs may not demonstrate findings that help in diagnosing osteomyelitis in neuropathic joints, which is a common problem.

The roles of ultrasonography and CT scanning are limited. Ultrasonography can be used to identify any local collection when infection occurs and to guide aspiration for cytologic analysis; however, it provides no further information regarding the integrity of underlying bone. Although CT scanning may be helpful in evaluating cortical destruction, sequestra, and intraosseous gas, these changes are not specific for neuropathic arthropathy.

The role of MRI and radionuclide scanning is to differentiate soft-tissue infection from osteomyelitis. Bone marrow edema is nonspecific and has several causes; therefore, differentiating bone marrow edema from neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) may not be possible on the basis of MRI findings alone. Similarly, enhanced bone activity on radionuclide scans is a nonspecific finding and may occur with several neoplastic, inflammatory, and degenerative processes.

Differential diagnosis and other problems to be considered

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease and primary osteoarthritis are in the differential diagnosis. In addition, in the early stage, neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) can simulate osteoarthritis, and bone fragmentation and collapse are seen in osteonecrosis, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, intra-articular steroid injection, infection, and alkaptonuria.

Special concerns

The incidence of osteomyelitis is increased in patients with neuropathic joints, particularly in the foot. Hence, careful follow-up imaging is essential.

Next

Radiography

Radiologic features of neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) are the same irrespective of the etiology and distribution. Early stage radiographic findings include persistent or progressive joint effusion, narrowing of the joint space, soft-tissue calcification, minimal subluxation, preservation of bone density (unless infected), and fragmentation of eburnated subchondral bone.

In the late stage, there is radiographic evidence of destruction of articular surfaces, subchondral sclerosis, osteophytosis, intra-articular loose bodies (bag of bones), subluxation, Lisfranc fracture/dislocation of midtarsal bones, and rapid bone resorption demonstrating pencil-in-a-cup deformity (see the images below). Complications of septic arthritis that are demonstrated on radiographs include osteomyelitis and bone ankylosis.

Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). NeuropathNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Neuropathic arthropathy in a patient with syringomyelia. Anteroposterior view of the elbow demonstrates resorption of the bone with opaque subchondral bone. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Lateral vNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Lateral view of the elbow shows disorganization of the joint (same patient as in the previous image). Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). NeuropathNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Neuropathic arthropathy in a patient with diabetes mellitus. Note the lateral disruption of the base of the metatarsal in relation to the tarsals, representing a Lisfranc fracture/dislocation. Note the soft-tissue gas and osteomyelitis of the second and third metatarsal heads. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Lisfranc Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Lisfranc fracture/dislocation in a patient with diabetes and neuropathic arthropathy. Note the soft-tissue swelling, fragmentation, sclerosis, and periostitis. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). OsteolysiNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Osteolysis of the distal metatarsals and phalanges with tapering results in a pencil-like appearance in the late stage of diabetic neuropathy.

Distribution of joint disease varies depending on the etiology. In diabetic neuropathy, common sites of involvement are the metatarsophalangeal, tarsometatarsal, and intertarsal joints (see the images below).

Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). AnteroposNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Anteroposterior view of the foot in a patient with diabetes and neuropathic arthropathy. Note the fragmentation, collapse, and sclerosis of the intertarsal joints. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Oblique vNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Oblique view of the foot in a patient with diabetes and neuropathic arthropathy shows destruction of the articular surface of the intertarsal joints with subchondral sclerosis (same patient as in the previous image).

In syringomyelia, neuropathic changes are relatively more common in the shoulder joint, followed by the elbow and wrist. The lower extremities can also be affected in syringomyelia. Changes in the spine are most characteristic in the cervical region.

Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). NeuropathNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Neuropathic arthropathy of the shoulder in a patient with syringomyelia. Note the destruction of the articular surface, dislocation, and debris, which are pathognomonic for a neuropathic joint. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). NeuropathNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Neuropathic arthropathy in a patient with syringomyelia. Anteroposterior view of the elbow demonstrates resorption of the bone with opaque subchondral bone. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Lateral vNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Lateral view of the elbow shows disorganization of the joint (same patient as in the previous image).

The joints of the lower extremity are commonly affected in patients with tabes dorsalis (see the images below). Other common sites include the joints of the forefoot and midfoot and the vertebral column.

Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Gross disNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Gross disorganization of the hip joints in a patient with tabes dorsalis. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Charcot jNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Charcot joint in a patient with tabes dorsalis who has dislocation, osseous fragmentation, and sclerosis. The opacities projected over the iliac blades represent intramuscular bismuth-containing injections. Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). FragmentaNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Fragmentation and collapse of the chondral and osseous structures of both knee joints in a patient with tabes dorsalis.

The ankle and intertarsal joints are commonly involved in patients with myelomeningocele and congenital insensitivity to pain (asymbolia). The interphalangeal joints of the hands and the metatarsophalangeal joints of the feet are commonly affected in patients with leprosy (see the following image). Neuropathic arthropathy associated with chronic alcoholism commonly involves the metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joints. The knee and ankle appear to be the predominant sites of involvement in patients with amyloidosis.

Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). AnteroposNeuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Anteroposterior and oblique views of a neuropathic foot in a patient with leprosy. Note the predominant involvement of the metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joints with severe periostitis.

Degree of confidence

Radiographic features found in the severe form of neuropathic arthropathy are pathognomonic, and no further imaging is necessary. Bone eburnation, fracture, subluxation, and joint disorganization can be more profound in this disorder. However, early changes may resemble osteoarthritis, and the bone collapse seen in the late stage may resemble osteonecrosis and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Radiography is a relatively insensitive modality when used in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis.

False positives/negatives

Early features of neuropathic arthropathy, such as joint space narrowing, marginal osteophytosis, and subchondral sclerosis, may resemble osteoarthritis. Neuropathylike arthropathy can be seen in patients with calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition disease. Bone fragmentation and collapse are manifestations of osteonecrosis, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, intra-articular steroid arthropathy, infection, and alkaptonuria.

Previous
Next

Computed Tomography

As with ultrasonography, CT scanning has no significant role in the diagnosis of neuropathic arthropathy. However, CT scans may be helpful in evaluating cortical destruction, sequestra, and intraosseous gas (see the following image).

Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Computed Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Computed tomography scan of the ankle in a patient with neuropathic arthropathy. Note the destruction of the articular surface, disorganization of the joint, and fragmentation.
Previous
Next

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

On T1-weighted MRIs, joints involved in neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) appear diffusely swollen and demonstrate low signal intensity. The fat plane adjacent to the skin ulceration appears hypointense; when the joints are infected with a gas-producing organism, areas showing a loss of signal intensity are seen. After the intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent, the inflammatory mass enhances and demonstrates central nonenhancing necrotic debris.

On short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences, early bone infection may be evidenced by high-signal marrow edema. Later, loss of clarity of the cortical outline and cortical destruction can be identified.

Features that help differentiate spinal neuroarthropathy from disk infection include joint disorganization; facet involvement; debris; a pattern of diffuse signal intensity in the vertebral bodies; spondylolisthesis; and rim enhancement of the disk on gadolinium-enhanced MRIs.[11] Features that do not help in differentiation include endplate sclerosis, erosions, osteophytes, a reduction in disk height, and paraspinal soft-tissue masses.

Gadolinium warning

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist], gadobenate dimeglumine [MultiHance], gadodiamide [Omniscan], gadoversetamide [OptiMARK], gadoteridol [ProHance]) have been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). For more information, see the eMedicine topic Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis. The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or MRA scans.

NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble moving or straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness. For more information, see the FDA Public Health Advisory or Medscape.

Degree of confidence

MRI plays a significant role in diagnosing complications. Findings help in assessing the extent of the disease and in determining the presence of osteomyelitis.

False positives/negatives

Differentiating bone changes that result from neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) from those that result from infection is difficult. Bone marrow edema is a nonspecific finding that can be seen in both neuropathic arthropathy and in infection. In general, bone marrow edema found close to a skin ulceration and away from a joint suggests infection.

Previous
Next

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography has no role in the diagnosis of neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). However, this modality can be used to identify any local collection when an infection occurs, and ultrasonography can be used to guide aspiration for obtaining cytologic specimens.

Previous
Next

Nuclear Imaging

The role of radioisotopic studies is to detect osteomyelitis in a neuropathic joint.[12] Three-phase phosphate scintigraphy has a high sensitivity (85%) but a low specificity (55%) because of bone remodeling of other causes. Studies using uptake of the gallium-67 (67 Ga) citrate have a high false-positive rate. Scanning using indium-111 (111 In)–labeled leukocytes has the highest sensitivity (87%) and specificity (81%) for detecting osteomyelitis in a neuropathic foot. The role of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is promising.[13]

One study has shown a valuable role of FDG-PET scanning in the setting of neuroarthropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) by reliably differentiating it from osteomyelitis, both in general and when foot ulcer is present.[14] In diabetic patients in the setting of concomitant foot ulcer, FDG-PET scanning accurately rules out osteomyelitis. Basu and associates estimated a 100% sensitivity and 93.8% accuracy of FDG-PET scanning in the diagnosis of Charcot foot; by contrast, MRI had a sensitivity of 76.9% and an accuracy of 75%.[14]

Degree of confidence

Increased uptake on radioisotope scan is seen in both neuropathic joints and in infection. Three-phase bone scan and67 Ga scintigraphy are sensitive but not specific. Imaging using111 In-labeled leukocytes has the highest sensitivity and specificity.

False positives/negatives

The incidence of false-positive results is increased because of coexisting bone remodeling.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR  Consultant Radiologist and Honorary Professor, North Manchester General Hospital Pennine Acute NHS Trust, UK

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, British Medical Association, British Society of Interventional Radiology, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of the United States, Royal College of Radiologists, and Royal College of Surgeons of England

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Muthusamy Chandramohan, MBBS, DMRD, FRCR  Consultant Radiologist, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, UK

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ian Turnbull, MB, ChB, MD, DMRD, FRCR  Lecturer, Department of Radiology, University of Manchester; Consulting Neuroradiologist, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester and North Manchester General Hospital, UK

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR  Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Amilcare Gentili, MD  Professor of Clinical Radiology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Thornton Hospital; Chief of Radiology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

Amilcare Gentili, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Skeletal Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD  Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Wilfred CG Peh, MD, MBBS, FRCP(Glasg), FRCP(Edin), FRCR  Clinical Professor, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Senior Consultant Radiologist, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore

Wilfred CG Peh, MD, MBBS, FRCP(Glasg), FRCP(Edin), FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, British Institute of Radiology, International Skeletal Society, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Robert M Krasny, MD  Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation

Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM  Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Bar-On E, Floman Y, Sagiv S, et al. Orthopaedic manifestations of familial dysautonomia. A review of one hundred and thirty-six patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Nov 2000;82-A(11):1563-70. [Medline].

  2. Bloomgarden ZT. American Diabetes Association 60th Scientific Sessions, 2000: the diabetic foot. Diabetes Care. May 2001;24(5):946-51. [Medline].

  3. Deirmengian CA, Lee SG, Jupiter JB. Neuropathic arthropathy of the elbow. A report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 2001;83-A(6):839-44. [Medline].

  4. Jones EA, Manaster BJ, May DA, Disler DG. Neuropathic osteoarthropathy: diagnostic dilemmas and differential diagnosis. Radiographics. Oct 2000;20 Spec No:S279-93. [Medline].

  5. Kapila A, Lines M. Neuropathic spinal arthropathy: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Jul-Aug 1987;11(4):736-9. [Medline].

  6. Sommer TC, Lee TH. Charcot foot: the diagnostic dilemma. Am Fam Physician. Nov 1 2001;64(9):1591-8. [Medline].

  7. Sanders LJ. What lessons can history teach us about the Charcot foot?. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. Jan 2008;25(1):1-15. [Medline].

  8. Rostom S, Bahiri R, Mahfoud-Filali S, Hajjaj-Hassouni N. Neurogenic osteoarthropathy in leprosy. Clin Rheumatol. Dec 2007;26(12):2153-5. [Medline].

  9. Soysal N, Ayhan M, Guney E, Akyol A. Differential diagnosis of Charcot arthropathy and osteomyelitis. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. Oct 2007;28(5):556-9. [Medline].

  10. Devendra D, Farmer K, Bruce G, et al. Diagnosing osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy. Diabetes Care. Dec 2001;24(12):2154-5. [Medline].

  11. Wagner SC, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, et al. Can imaging findings help differentiate spinal neuropathic arthropathy from disk space infection? Initial experience. Radiology. Mar 2000;214(3):693-9. [Medline].

  12. Palestro CJ, Mehta HH, Patel M, et al. Marrow versus infection in the Charcot joint: indium-111 leukocyte and technetium-99m sulfur colloid scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. Feb 1998;39(2):346-50. [Medline].

  13. Alnafisi N, Yun M, Alavi A. F-18 FDG positron emission tomography to differentiate diabetic osteoarthropathy from septic arthritis. Clin Nucl Med. Jul 2001;26(7):638-9. [Medline].

  14. Basu S, Chryssikos T, Houseni M, Scot Malay D, Shah J, Zhuang H, et al. Potential role of FDG PET in the setting of diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy: can it differentiate uncomplicated Charcot's neuroarthropathy from osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection?. Nucl Med Commun. Jun 2007;28(6):465-72. [Medline].

  15. Koop I, Loreck D, Krause A. Diabetic neuropathic arthropathy. Arthritis Rheum. Apr 1999;42(4):806. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Neuropathic arthropathy of the shoulder in a patient with syringomyelia. Note the destruction of the articular surface, dislocation, and debris, which are pathognomonic for a neuropathic joint.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Neuropathic arthropathy in a patient with syringomyelia. Anteroposterior view of the elbow demonstrates resorption of the bone with opaque subchondral bone.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Lateral view of the elbow shows disorganization of the joint (same patient as in the previous image).
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Gross disorganization of the hip joints in a patient with tabes dorsalis.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Charcot joint in a patient with tabes dorsalis who has dislocation, osseous fragmentation, and sclerosis. The opacities projected over the iliac blades represent intramuscular bismuth-containing injections.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Fragmentation and collapse of the chondral and osseous structures of both knee joints in a patient with tabes dorsalis.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Anteroposterior view of the foot in a patient with diabetes and neuropathic arthropathy. Note the fragmentation, collapse, and sclerosis of the intertarsal joints.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Oblique view of the foot in a patient with diabetes and neuropathic arthropathy shows destruction of the articular surface of the intertarsal joints with subchondral sclerosis (same patient as in the previous image).
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Computed tomography scan of the ankle in a patient with neuropathic arthropathy. Note the destruction of the articular surface, disorganization of the joint, and fragmentation.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Anteroposterior and oblique views of a neuropathic foot in a patient with leprosy. Note the predominant involvement of the metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joints with severe periostitis.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Neuropathic arthropathy in a patient with diabetes mellitus. Note the lateral disruption of the base of the metatarsal in relation to the tarsals, representing a Lisfranc fracture/dislocation. Note the soft-tissue gas and osteomyelitis of the second and third metatarsal heads.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Lisfranc fracture/dislocation in a patient with diabetes and neuropathic arthropathy. Note the soft-tissue swelling, fragmentation, sclerosis, and periostitis.
Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint). Osteolysis of the distal metatarsals and phalanges with tapering results in a pencil-like appearance in the late stage of diabetic neuropathy.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.