eMedicine Specialties > Radiology > Musculoskeletal

Osteochondroma and Osteochondromatosis

Author: Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP, Chairman of Medical Imaging, Professor of Radiology, NGHA, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Coauthor(s): Mohammed Jassim Al-Salman, MBBS, Consulting Radiologist, King Abdul Aziz Medical City, National Guard Hospital; Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 29, 2008

Introduction

Background

An osteochondroma is a cartilage-covered bony excrescence (exostosis) that arises from the surface of a bone. Osteochondromas, which are the most common bone tumors in children, may be solitary or multiple, and they may arise spontaneously or as a result of previous osseous trauma. An osteochondroma can affect any bone preformed in cartilage.

The true prevalence of solitary osteochondromas is not known, because many asymptomatic lesions go undiagnosed. Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME), also known as osteochondromatosis, is an inherited, autosomal dominant disorder in which multiple osteochondromas are seen throughout the skeleton. John Hunter was the first to comment on HME and described a patient with the condition in his Lectures on the principles of surgery (1786).1 The first description of a family with HME was published by Boyer, in 1814.2 In 1825, a second family with HME was described.3

Most osteochondromas, solitary or multiple, arise from tubular bones and are metaphyseal in location. Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia and dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica (DEH), also known as Trevor disease, are autosomal dominant conditions in which the chondromas arise from the epiphysis and cause joint problems.

Patients with HME may have anywhere from 2 osteochondromas to hundreds of them. Most solitary osteochondromas are discovered incidentally in children and adolescents. A painless skeletal swelling or a slowly growing mass is the usual mode of presentation. HME leads to abnormalities such as palpable bony masses and limb shortening in the first or second decade of life.

Complications of osteochondromas include fractures, bony deformities, neurologic and vascular injuries, bursa formation, and malignant transformation. Advances have added to the understanding of the molecular and genetic bases of HME.

Multiple osteochondromatosis. Fractures of the lo...

Multiple osteochondromatosis. Fractures of the lower tibia and fibula as a complication of hereditary multiple exostoses. Note the osteochondromas involving the calcaneum and the upper and lower portions of the tibia and fibula.

Multiple osteochondromatosis. Fractures of the lo...

Multiple osteochondromatosis. Fractures of the lower tibia and fibula as a complication of hereditary multiple exostoses. Note the osteochondromas involving the calcaneum and the upper and lower portions of the tibia and fibula.


Multiple osteochondromatosis. Nonenhanced, axial ...

Multiple osteochondromatosis. Nonenhanced, axial computed tomography (CT) scan through the pelvis (same patient as in Image 7 in Multimedia). Note the fragmentation of the osteochondroma and the considerable soft-tissue mass. Histology of the resected specimen revealed a low-grade chondrosarcoma.

Multiple osteochondromatosis. Nonenhanced, axial ...

Multiple osteochondromatosis. Nonenhanced, axial computed tomography (CT) scan through the pelvis (same patient as in Image 7 in Multimedia). Note the fragmentation of the osteochondroma and the considerable soft-tissue mass. Histology of the resected specimen revealed a low-grade chondrosarcoma.


Osteochondroma with malignant degeneration. Plain...

Osteochondroma with malignant degeneration. Plain radiograph of the pelvis in a 68-year-old woman who presented with a painful lump over the left greater trochanter. Note the sclerotic exostosis arising from the left greater trochanter. Technetium-99m (99mTc) diphosphonate scintigram (left) shows intense activity in the region of the left greater trochanter. At surgery (right), the lesion was diagnosed as a low-grade chondrosarcoma superimposed on an osteochondroma.

Osteochondroma with malignant degeneration. Plain...

Osteochondroma with malignant degeneration. Plain radiograph of the pelvis in a 68-year-old woman who presented with a painful lump over the left greater trochanter. Note the sclerotic exostosis arising from the left greater trochanter. Technetium-99m (99mTc) diphosphonate scintigram (left) shows intense activity in the region of the left greater trochanter. At surgery (right), the lesion was diagnosed as a low-grade chondrosarcoma superimposed on an osteochondroma.


Pathophysiology

Solitary osteochondromas

Solitary osteochondromas are a relatively frequent finding and are regarded as true tumors or growth disturbances. They form in parts of the skeleton that develop from endochondral ossification and thus are closely linked to physes.

Solitary osteochondromas vary considerably in size; the average lesion arising from a tubular bone is approximately 4 cm. Osteochondromas arising from flat bones tend to be larger.

On pathologic sections, the osteochondroma is found to have a cartilaginous cap. Histologically, the cartilaginous cap is identical to the physeal growth plate. During active growth, the cap is composed of hyaline cartilage. The thickness of the cap is correlated with the age of the patient, and the cap decreases in size as patients age. In children and adolescents, the cap may be as thick as 3 cm, whereas in older patients, it may be nonexistent. A thick, cartilaginous cap (>1 cm) in adults should raise the possibility of malignant transformation.

Osteochondromas

Osteochondromas develop due to a beaked failure of constriction, with cortical overgrowth adjacent to the growth plate. Subsequent eccentric, bony growth from this beak usually, but not invariably, occurs in a direction away from the joint, forming an excrescence that continues to grow until the growth plate closes and growth ceases at puberty.

Malignant degeneration occurs in 1-25% of cases and should be suspected if an exostosis rapidly increases in size, especially in an adult. Spontaneous resolution of osteochondromas has been described. Osteochondromas that continue to grow after puberty should raise the possibility of chondrosarcomatous transformation.

Hereditary multiple exostoses

Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) is an autosomal dominant condition associated with short stature, multiple osteochondromas, and asymmetrical growth at the knees and ankles; it may lead to deformities.4 The leg-length inequality is usually about 4 cm, and the risk of malignant degeneration is between 1% and 20%.

The osteochondromas are located close to the metaphyses, and they may be sessile or pedunculated. The cortex of the lesion is continuous with the cortex of the bone, with a homogeneous continuation of the medulla.5

Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica

DEH, or Trevor disease, is characterized by osteochondromas arising in the epiphyses and thus involving the joint. The lesions are usually restricted to 1 side of the body, either left or right. Hence, the name hemimelica is used, to reflect involvement of 1 side of the body. There may be multiple lesions in a single limb.

DEH usually occurs in infants or young children. DEH primarily involves 1 side of an epiphysis; the medial side is affected twice as often as the lateral side. On macroscopic inspection, the bony lesion is found to be a pedunculated mass closely connected to the epiphysis with a cartilaginous cap. The histologic appearances are similar to those of an osteochondroma.

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia is another autosomal dominant condition characterized by the presence of irregular epiphyseal ossification, with intracapsular or periarticular chondromas of the knees and ankles. Patients with this condition usually present in late childhood. The spine is usually normal.

Osteochondromatosis, dominant carpotarsal

Osteochondromatosis, dominant carpotarsal, is another autosomal dominant entity, which Maroteaux and colleagues described in a mother and son. This appeared to be the same condition as that in the family reported by Hensinger and coauthors. The osteochondromas are confined to carpotarsal bones. Maroteaux suggested that osteochondromatosis, dominant carpotarsal, is a condition distinct from DEH. Osteochondromatosis, dominant carpotarsal, is usually sporadic.

Pathogenesis

Osteochondromas develop due to a beaked failure of constriction, with cortical overgrowth adjacent to the growth plate and subsequent eccentric, bony growth from this beak usually away from the joint. The excrescence that forms then continues to grow until the growth plate closes; growth ceases at puberty. Malignant degeneration occurs in 1-25% of cases and should be suspected if an exostosis rapidly increases in size, especially in an adult. Spontaneous resolution of osteochondromas has been described. Osteochondromas that continue to grow after puberty should raise the possibility of chondrosarcomatous transformation.

The pathogenesis of HME is poorly understood, but many theories have been put forward to explain its development. The isolation of islets of cartilaginous tissues from the diaphyseal surface of growing cartilage had been hypothesized to cause abnormal osteogenesis. Further theories postulate that osteochondroma formation is related to a defect in the anchoring of germinal cartilage cells to the physis or to the failure of a thin, cortical sleeve of bone acting as a structural constraint, with this failure allowing a spillover of physeal cells onto the metaphysis. The physical-stress theory postulates that focal accumulations of embryonic connective tissue at sites of tendon attachments are converted to hyaline cartilage.

Müller supports a clonal etiology and theorizes that osteochondromas result from a primary defect in periosteal differentiation in which ectopic collections of cartilage cells arise from the proliferative layer of the metaphyseal periosteum.6,7 Multipotent mesenchymal cells in the region of the perichondral groove of Ranvier have also been implicated in the development of osteochondromas.

Langenskiöld believes that proliferative interstitial physeal chondrocytes persist in chondrogenesis as they are transformed into the proliferative layer of the metaphyseal periosteum.

Clonal karyotypic abnormalities have been documented in osteochondromas. Studies indicate that the cartilaginous portion of the osteochondroma has a clonal or neoplastic origin.

Porter and Simpson believe that the osteal portion of the osteochondroma provides only a supportive stroma, an idea that is supported by the fact that ablation of the cartilage cap alone is followed by cessation of growth of the osteochondroma.8 Currently, however, no molecular or immunohistochemical data supports this observation.

Genetic basis of disease

HME is an autosomal dominant disorder with near-complete penetrance. Genetically heterogeneous, it has been associated with mutations in at least 3 different EXT genes. Changes in EXT1 and EXT2 seem to be the most common in HME. Two of the genes are known to function as tumor suppressor genes.9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25

The 3 EXT loci have been mapped: EXT1 is in chromosomal regions 8q23-q24, EXT2 is on 11p11-p12, and EXT3 is on chromosome arm 19p.26,27,28,29,30,31 Linkage analysis show that the EXT1 and EXT2 loci appear to be altered in most families, whereas EXT3, which has not been fully isolated and characterized, is probably less frequently involved.

Epidemiologic analysis of linkage and mutation data indicate that mutations of EXT1 and EXT2 are likely to be responsible respectively for one half and one third of all cases of multiple hereditary exostoses. Further work indicates that in sporadic exostoses and in the inherited ones, chromosomal deletions are present surrounding the EXT1 and EXT2 loci. Additionally, the EXT -like genes are located at sites of tumor suppressor genes in neoplasia32 ; EXTL1 has been localized to 1p36, which is often a site of deletion in tumors. EXTL3 may be a breast cancer locus.33,34,35

Research has shown loss of heterozygosity at the EXT loci in the cartilaginous cap of osteochondromas and in tissue from chondrosarcomas. Further, clonal karyotypic anomalies have been documented in osteochondromas. These studies indicate that the cartilaginous portion of the osteochondroma has a clonal or neoplastic origin.

HME has been associated with other genetic syndromes, such as Langer-Giedion syndrome (LGS), or trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type II (TRP II), and DEFECT 11 syndrome.36 Patients with TRP II have a deletion of the EXT1 gene, and they often have associated mental retardation, cone-shaped epiphyses, and atypical facies. DEFECT 11 syndrome involves osteochondromas, enlarged parietal foramina, craniofacial dysostosis, and mental retardation. Patients with this syndrome have deletions of the entire EXT2 gene in chromosomal regions 11p11-p12.

Frequency

United States

Solitary osteochondromas are the most common skeletal tumors in childhood, occurring in approximately 1 in 200 children. However, the true prevalence of solitary osteochondromas is not known, because many asymptomatic lesions are never diagnosed.

A study from Washington State revealed that about 1 person in 50,000 is likely to have hereditary multiple exostoses (HME). In the families studied, 90% had a family history of HME.

International

There are no data to suggest that the international frequency of osteochondromas internationally is different from that in the United States.

Mortality/Morbidity

Morbidity and mortality are primarily related to the complications associated with osteochondromas (see Complications of Osteochondromas in Clinical Details).

Race

  • Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) is more frequently found in white persons than in persons of other races and affects 0.9-2 individuals per 100,000 population.
  • A higher incidence of HME has been described in isolated communities, such as the Chamorros of Guam or the Ojibwa Indian community of Pauingassi, in Manitoba, Canada. These populations have a prevalence of 100 and 1310 cases per 100,000 population, respectively.

Sex

  • Solitary osteochondromas are more prevalent in males than in females.
  • Although hereditary multiple exostoses (HME; diaphyseal achalasia) was previously thought to have a male predominance, it now appears to affect both sexes equally.
  • Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica (DEH) occurs more commonly in males than in females.

Age

  • Solitary osteochondromas typically occur in the first to third decades.
  • Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) usually appear in childhood (2-10 y); they are most often discovered by age 4 years.

Presentation

Physical findings

Solitary osteochondromas

Osteochondromas can occur at any time between birth and the cessation of growth. Most solitary osteochondromas are discovered in children and adolescents as painless, slow-growing masses. However, depending on the location of the osteochondroma, significant symptoms may occur as a result of complications, such as fracture, bony deformity, mechanical joint problems, and vascular or neurologic compromise. Pain, swelling, and an enlarging soft-tissue mass may herald malignant transformation.37 The estimates of the risk of malignant transformation (usually chondrosarcomas) vary, with a range of 1-25%.

Hereditary multiple exostoses

Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) is an autosomal dominant condition associated with short stature, multiple osteochondromas, and asymmetric growth at the knees and ankles, which may lead to deformities. Leg-length inequality is usually about 4 cm, and the risk of malignant degeneration is about 1-20%.

Patients with HME can have anywhere from 2 osteochondromas to hundreds of them. Most osteochondromas related to HME are located at the periphery of the most rapidly growing ends of long bones, but they also commonly involve the medial borders of the scapulae, ribs, and iliac crests. Osteochondromas affect the tarsus and carpus less frequently. Skull involvement has been reported only once, and involvement of the facial bones has not been reported.

Osteochondromas in HME come to clinical attention during the first decade of life in more than 80% of patients. The most common locations where the bony lumps are discovered are on the tibia and the scapulae. In rare cases, osteochondromas are discovered at birth, but these are usually cases in which a targeted search is made in the context of a positive family history. Several reports have described osteochondromas interfering with normal birth in pregnancy and leading to a higher rate of cesarean deliveries.

Osteochondromas tend to grow while the growth plates are open, but growth ceases with skeletal maturity. Rarely, spontaneous resolution of osteochondromas has been reported during childhood and puberty. Recurrence of an exostosis after surgical ablation has been reported, but it is usually attributed to incomplete resection. Most osteochondromas in HME are painless, and the patient's concern may be cosmetic. However, pain may ensue after soft-tissue trauma.

Pain is a common presentation with malignant transformation. The formation of a bursal compartment surrounding a large osteochondroma is common. Bursae are particularly common at sites of friction around scapulae and the distal femur. These bursae may become inflamed and painful.

Impaired body growth, symmetrical and asymmetrical, is common in HME. The result is short stature, limb-length discrepancies, valgus deformities of the knee and ankle, asymmetry of the pectoral and pelvic girdles, bowing of the radius (with ulnar deviation of the wrist), and subluxation of the radial head. Patients with HME frequently have a short stature, usually with a height 0.5-1.0 standard deviation below the mean. About 36.8% of affected men and 44.2% of affected women have been observed to have a height below the fifth percentile.

Limbs are usually involved disproportionately, as compared with the spine. Limb-length inequality of 2 cm or greater has been reported, with a prevalence ranging from 10-50%. Shortening can occur in the femur and/or the tibia; the femur is affected approximately twice as commonly as the tibia. Scoliosis, coxa valga (25%), acetabular dysplasia, and shortening of the metatarsals, metacarpals, and phalanges occur less frequently.

Tendons, nerves, or blood vessels may be trapped around osteochondromas, leading to symptoms. Spinal cord compression is a rare complication of HME, and several case reports have appeared in the literature. Visceral injuries and/or luminal obstructions have been described with inwardly growing osteochondromas. These conditions include dysphagia, hemothorax, and urinary and intestinal obstruction.38,39

The severity of forearm involvement in HME has been linked to the overall severity of the disease. Taniguchi categorized patients into 3 groups40 : (1) those with a normal distal forearm, (2) those with involvement of the distal radius or ulna without bone shortening, and (3) those with involvement of the distal radius or ulna with bone shortening. He concluded that an increasing forearm involvement was associated greater severity of the disease process overall and that patients with more osteochondromas, particularly those involving the knee, have an increased valgus deformity and shorter stature. Forearm involvement also leads to an earlier diagnosis.41

The hand is involved in 30-79% patients. The metacarpals and phalanges are affected in most patients, who are usually asymptomatic. Osteochondromas may result in shortening of the metacarpals and phalanges, and brachydactyly may also be seen in the absence of osteochondromas. Osteochondromas affect the forearm (40-60%) more frequently than they do the upper arm.

Radial bowing may ensue as a result of disproportionate ulnar shortening with relative radial overgrowth. Radial head subluxation or dislocation may be a sequel to the radial overgrowth. Although this deformity superficially resembles Madelung anomaly, the characteristic relative elongation or dorsal subluxation of the distal ulna seen in Madelung deformity is not present.

Femoral anteversion and valgus have been reported with osteochondromas located near the lesser trochanter. Proximal femoral osteochondromas can cause impairment of hip flexion. Rare cases of acetabular dysplasia resulting in subluxation of the hip have been reported. Valgus deformity of the knees occurs in as many as 30% of patients. The fibula may be shortened disproportionately as compared with the tibia, contributing to a consistent valgus deformity. Angular limb deformities are commonly associated with osteochondromas, affecting the proximal tibia (70-98%) or fibula (30-97%).

Valgus deformity of the ankle is a common complication (45-54%) attributed to multiple factors, including shortening of the fibula relative to the tibia. Obliquity resulting from a valgus deformity of the ankle may cause medial subluxation of the talus.

Neurologic and vascular compromise may affect both extremities. Symptoms of peripheral nerve compression occur in 22.6% of patients. A recognized complication of HME in children is peroneal neuropathy associated with an osteochondroma affecting the proximal fibula. A single report describes ulnar neuropathy from compression by an osteochondroma at the elbow. Vascular compromise secondary to osteochondromas has been reported in 11.3% of patients with HME. The popliteal artery is most frequently involved. Vascular compression, arterial thrombosis, aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm formation, and venous thrombosis are common complications and lead to claudication pain, acute ischemia, and signs of phlebitis.42

Malignant degeneration

Malignant degeneration of a benign osteochondroma occurs in 1-25% of patients. The likelihood of such transformation is greater with HME than with other conditions. Most transformations are to a chondrosarcoma, but other sarcomata may complicate the disease. Most patients with this complication present with a painful mass.

Rarely, nerve compression can be the presenting complaint. The mean age at diagnosis is reported to be 31 years. Malignant transformation is said to occur only rarely in the first or fifth decade of life.

The risk of superimposed malignant transformation varies among families, reflecting genetic heterogeneity that predisposes osteochondromas to malignant degeneration. Because of this risk, a case can be made for a careful follow-up of patients with HME .

Growth of an osteochondroma in a mature skeleton should suggest malignancy and must be assessed. Additionally, an osteochondroma with a cartilaginous cap greater than 1 cm in an adult should be carefully assessed, because this finding has also been associated with an increased risk of malignancy.

Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica

Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica (DEH), or Trevor disease, usually occurs in infants or young children. The clinical manifestations include pain, swelling, and joint deformity localized to 1 side of the body. The lower limbs are more commonly affected than are the upper limbs. The talus, distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal tibia are the sites typically affected. Approximately 70% of patients have multiple-bone involvement in a single limb.

Complications of osteochondromas

Complications of osteochondromas include fractures, bony deformities, neurologic and vascular injuries, bursa formation, and malignant transformation. Research advances have added to the understanding of the molecular and genetic bases of HME.

A large, pedunculated osteochondroma may be exposed to trauma and fracture.

Osseous deformity can affect the tubular bones. This complication is generally associated with large osteochondromas and occurs more frequently with HME than with other conditions. Growth disturbance may also occur; again, this is more common with HME.

Morbidity may arise as a result of arterial or venous thrombosis. Aneurysms and false aneurysms have been described. Vascular complications occur more commonly in the popliteal artery with osteochondromas affecting the knee.

Neurologic complications occur in 8% of patients. Such complications are mostly related to spinal cord compression or compromise of the nerve roots by spinal osteochondromas.

Bursa formation can surround the tip of the osteochondroma. This happens more commonly with large osteochondromas than with small ones. These bursae may become inflamed or infected, becoming symptomatic.

Severe DEH is associated with muscle wasting, growth disturbance, and joint deformities.

Malignant transformation has been estimated to occur in 1-25% of osteochondromas; this appears to be more common in HME than in other conditions. The complicating tumor is usually a chondrosarcoma and is generally of low grade.

Appreciable morbidity is related to resection of osteochondromas and to corrective surgery on osteochondroma-related osseous deformity. Resection should be performed only when the skeleton has matured, unless the lesion is symptomatic. Resection performed in an immature skeleton may result in a severe growth deformity if damage to the epiphyseal plate occurs.

Preferred Examination

Plain radiography remains the examination of choice in the evaluation of osteochondromas, and it may be the only imaging study required. The radiographic appearances of osteochondromas are usually characteristic.

Computed tomography (CT) scanning is particularly useful in the assessment of osteochondromas in the pelvis, shoulder, or spine. With spiral and multisection CT scanning, excellent reconstructions can be formatted in various planes without exposing the patient to a further radiation burden.

Ultrasonography can be used in the evaluation of the cartilaginous cap and of complications associated with osteochondromas, such as arterial or venous thrombosis, aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm formation, and bursitis.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for assessing continuity of the parent bone with the cortical and medullary bone in an osteochondroma. Cartilage in the cap has high signal intensity on T2-weighted, spin-echo MRI scans. This characteristic allows measurement of the cap, which is an important consideration in malignant transformation. MRI also provides information about inflammation in reactive bursa formation, impingement syndromes, and arterial and venous compromise. This study is the method of choice for evaluating compression of the spinal cord, nerve roots, and peripheral nerves.

Arteriography remains the criterion standard for depicting vascular occlusion, as well as aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm formation. Angiography is not universally employed in the diagnosis of sarcomatous transformation, but it is highly useful for tracing the malignant character and true extent of the lesion.

Limitations of Techniques

None of the imaging techniques described are reliable in differentiating a benign osteochondroma from a sarcomatous transformation.

Although plain radiographs are an excellent means of depicting osseous pathology, they do not provide reliable information about adjacent soft-tissue compromise (such as tendinous, vascular, or neurologic involvement) or about bursa inflammation. Plain radiographs may also not be sufficient to provide images of osteochondromas involving complex bones, such as the spinal column.

Ultrasonography can provide information on the cartilage cap but not on the underlying bone in an osteochondroma. Also, ultrasonography remains operator dependent.

With CT scanning, radiation burden in the young may be a disadvantage, particularly when several examinations may be required in the workup of hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) or sarcomatous transformation.

Angiography is invasive, and because of the iodinated contrast material used in this procedure, there is a risk of anaphylaxis and renal toxicity.

MRI is expensive, has limited availability, and cannot be performed in the claustrophobic patient and in patients with certain types of heart valves, surgical clips, or other ferromagnetic foreign bodies.

Radionuclide scanning has high sensitivity but low specificity. It is also expensive and has limited availability. Radionuclides are not reliable in differentiating between a benign osteochondroma and a chondrosarcoma.

Experience with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is limited.43 In addition, the procedure is expensive and has limited availability.

Differential Diagnoses

Other Problems to Be Considered

Metaphyseal spurs

  • Hyperparathyroidism
  • Short-rib polydactyly syndrome type II
  • Short-rib polydactyly syndrome type III
  • Spur-limbed dwarfism
  • Adenosine deaminase deficiency - Associated with irregularity of the metaphyseal ends of long bones, splayed metaphyses, metaphyseal spurs perpendicular to the long axis of bones, short and wide ribs, cup-shaped at costochondral junctions, bone-within-a-bone appearance of vertebrae, and osteoporosis, among other skeletal abnormalities
  • Copper deficiency - Associated with osteoporosis, irregularity and cupping of the provisional zone of calcification, sickle-shaped spur formation continuous with the provisional zone of calcification, multiple fractures, subperiosteal hemorrhage, subperiosteal elation and calcification, and delayed skeletal growth
  • Iso-Kikuchi syndrome - Associated with asymmetric upper limb anomalies, hypoplastic thumb, triphalangeal thumb, long and slender metacarpals, hypoplastic carpal bones, fusion of the radius and ulna, and subungual spur
  • Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva - Associated with microdactyly, small vertebrae, ossification of ligamentous insertions producing pseudo-exostoses, and spiking and flaring of metaphyses
  • Hypophosphatasia - Associated with a variety of prenatal and postnatal skeletal abnormalities (Spurs [eg, Bowdler spur] in the midportion of long bones are a known association.)
  • Menkes disease - Associated with bilateral metaphyseal spurring of long bones in infancy, flaring of the ribs, osteoporosis, fractures and diaphyseal periosteal reaction of the long bones, thickening of the scapulae and clavicles, and CNS abnormalities

Exostoses/osteochondromas

  • Fetal alcohol syndrome - Multisystemic disorder associated with bilateral tibial exostoses
  • Turner syndrome - Associated with exostosis of tibia
  • Tuberous sclerosis - Described association with exostoses of long bones
  • Radiation-induced osteochondromas
  • Traumatic bony injury/fractures
  • Acrodysostosis - Associated with brachycephaly, hypoplastic facial bones, thick calvarium, peripheral dysostosis, epiphyseal and vertebral stippling, and exostoses of the proximal tibia
  • Osteochondromatosis, carpotarsal dominant - Associated with osteochondromas of carpal and tarsal bones, cuboid, calcaneum, metacarpals, metatarsals, fibulae, and tibiae
  • Chondroectodermal dysplasia - Associated with short ribs, bowed femur, trident iliac wings, bowed humerus, and exostosis of the medial aspect of the distal metaphysis of the humerus in the newborn
  • TRP II (LGS) - Associated with multiple exostoses and redundant skin folds (The presence of exostoses differentiates TRP II from TRP I.)
  • Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP) - Also known as the Nora lesion; a benign process that can be confused with osteochondromas and is occasionally misinterpreted as a malignant process44,45 (Radiologically, calcific masses are attached to the underlying cortex without interruption of the latter. The original report described lesions confined to the small bones of the hands and feet, but subsequent reports have included the skull, maxilla, and long bones [eg, tibia, femur].)

Spurs seen as normal anatomic variants

  • Cervical spine - Development of a spurlike process from the posterior neural arch
  • Olecranon - Spurs usually seen in the young
  • Radius - Spur located in the distal radius in adolescents
  • Metacarpals/metatarsals - Spur on the distal end of the bones associated with accessory ossification centers
  • Phalanges - Spurs that affect the proximal phalanges in the fingers and the medial aspects of the terminal phalanges in the toes
  • Ribs - Spurs that may affect any rib
  • Acetabulum - Spurlike superior lip
  • Sacroiliac joints - Spur on the inferior aspect of the joint
  • Obturator foramen - Spurs in the obturator foramen arising from the pubis; usually seen in the elderly
  • Ileum - Spurring of muscle attachments; usually seen in the elderly
  • Patella - Spurs on the medial aspect
  • Fibula - Tug lesion at both ends of the soleus muscle producing a fibular spur and the soleal line
  • Calcaneum - Transient developmental spur in infants
  • Navicular bone - Spurlike process projecting posteriorly
  • Humerus - Upper metaphyseal spurs seen in young adults and adolescents (A supracondylar process is a vestigial structure associated with symptoms; it occurs in about 1% of the European population. The axis of the process is directed distally.)
  • Tibia - Spur on the tibial plateau in the absence of osteoarthritis; possibly represents attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament (A small spur may be present on the medial tibial metaphyses; it probably represents a tug lesion produced by the tibial collateral ligament.)

More on Osteochondroma and Osteochondromatosis

Overview: Osteochondroma and Osteochondromatosis
Imaging: Osteochondroma and Osteochondromatosis
Follow-up: Osteochondroma and Osteochondromatosis
Multimedia: Osteochondroma and Osteochondromatosis
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Hunter J. The Works of John Hunter. vol 1. London, England: Longman, Rees; 1835.

  2. Boyer, A. Traité des maladies chirurgicales. vol 3. Paris, France: Ve Migneret; 1814:594.

  3. Guy's hospital reports case of cartilaginous exostosis. Lancet. 1825;2:91.

  4. Alvarez CM, De Vera MA, Heslip TR, et al. Evaluation of the anatomic burden of patients with hereditary multiple exostoses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Sep 2007;462:73-9. [Medline].

  5. Matsumoto Y, Matsuda S, Matono K, et al. Intra-articular osteochondroma of the knee joint in a patient with hereditary multiple osteochondromatosis. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. Dec 2007;98(12):425-30. [Medline].

  6. Müller E. Uber hereditare multiple cartilaginare exostosen und exchondrosen. Beitr Pathol Anat. 1914;57:232.

  7. Mansoor A, Beals RK. Multiple exostosis: a short study of abnormalities near the growth plate. J Pediatr Orthop B. Sep 2007;16(5):363-5. [Medline].

  8. Porter DE, Simpson AH. The neoplastic pathogenesis of solitary and multiple osteochondromas. J Pathol. Jun 1999;188(2):119-25. [Medline].

  9. Ahn J, Ludecke HJ, Lindow S, et al. Cloning of the putative tumour suppressor gene for hereditary multiple exostoses (EXT1). Nat Genet. Oct 1995;11(2):137-43. [Medline].

  10. Bellaiche Y, The I, Perrimon N. Tout-velu is a Drosophila homologue of the putative tumour suppressor EXT-1 and is needed for Hh diffusion. Nature. Jul 2 1998;394(6688):85-8. [Medline].

  11. Bovée JV, Cleton-Jansen AM, Wuyts W, et al. EXT-mutation analysis and loss of heterozygosity in sporadic and hereditary osteochondromas and secondary chondrosarcomas. Am J Hum Genet. Sep 1999;65(3):689-98. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. Bridge JA, Nelson M, Orndal C. Clonal karyotypic abnormalities of the hereditary multiple exostoses chromosomal loci 8q24.1 (EXT1) and 11p11-12 (EXT2) in patients with sporadic and hereditary osteochondromas. Cancer. May 1 1998;82(9):1657-63. [Medline].

  13. Hall CR, Wu Y, Shaffer LG. Familial case of Potocki-Shaffer syndrome associated with microdeletion of EXT2 and ALX4. Clin Genet. Nov 2001;60(5):356-9. [Medline].

  14. Hecht JT, Hogue D, Strong LC, et al. Hereditary multiple exostosis and chondrosarcoma: linkage to chromosome II and loss of heterozygosity for EXT-linked markers on chromosomes II and 8. Am J Hum Genet. May 1995;56(5):1125-31. [Medline][Full Text].

  15. Hecht JT, Hogue D, Wang Y, et al. Hereditary multiple exostoses (EXT): mutational studies of familial EXT1 cases and EXT-associated malignancies. Am J Hum Genet. Jan 1997;60(1):80-6. [Medline].

  16. Li H, Yamagata T, Mori M. Association of autism in two patients with hereditary multiple exostoses caused by novel deletion mutations of EXT1. J Hum Genet. 2002;47(5):262-5. [Medline].

  17. McCormick C, Leduc Y, Martindale D, et al. The putative tumour suppressor EXT1 alters the expression of cell-surface heparan sulfate. Nat Genet. Jun 1998;19(2):158-61. [Medline].

  18. Philippe C, Porter DE, Emerton ME. Mutation screening of the EXT1 and EXT2 genes in patients with hereditary multiple exostoses. Am J Hum Genet. Sep 1997;61(3):520-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  19. Raskind WH, Conrad EU 3rd, Matsushita M. Evaluation of locus heterogeneity and EXT1 mutations in 34 families with hereditary multiple exostoses. Hum Mutat. 1998;11(3):231-9. [Medline].

  20. Stickens D, Evans GA. Isolation and characterization of the murine homolog of the human EXT2 multiple exostoses gene. Biochem Mol Med. Jun 1997;61(1):16-21. [Medline].

  21. Stickens D, Clines G, Burbee D, et al. The EXT2 multiple exostoses gene defines a family of putative tumour suppressor genes. Nat Genet. Sep 1996;14(1):25-32. [Medline].

  22. Wells DE, Hill A, Lin X. Identification of novel mutations in the human EXT1 tumor suppressor gene. Hum Genet. May 1997;99(5):612-5. [Medline].

  23. Hogue DA, Cole WG, Hecht J. Mutational steps leading to the development of bony exostoses. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:365.

  24. Jäger M, Westhoff B, Portier S, et al. Clinical outcome and genotype in patients with hereditary multiple exostoses. J Orthop Res. Dec 2007;25(12):1541-51. [Medline].

  25. Wuyts W, Van Hul W, Wauters J. Positional cloning of a gene involved in hereditary multiple exostoses. Hum Mol Genet. Oct 1996;5(10):1547-57. [Medline][Full Text].

  26. Ligon AH, Potocki L, Shaffer LG, et al. Gene for multiple exostoses (EXT2) maps to 11(p11.2p12) and is deleted in patients with a contiguous gene syndrome. Am J Med Genet. Feb 17 1998;75(5):538-40. [Medline].

  27. Mertens F, Rydholm A, Kreicbergs A. Loss of chromosome band 8q24 in sporadic osteocartilaginous exostoses. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Jan 1994;9(1):8-12. [Medline].

  28. Le Merrer M, Legeai-Mallet L, Jeannin PM. A gene for hereditary multiple exostoses maps to chromosome 19p. Hum Mol Genet. May 1994;3(5):717-22. [Medline].

  29. Ludecke HJ, Schmidt O, Nardmann J. Genes and chromosomal breakpoints in the Langer-Giedion syndrome region on human chromosome 8. Hum Genet. Dec 1999;105(6):619-28. [Medline].

  30. Ludecke HJ, Wagner MJ, Nardmann J. Molecular dissection of a contiguous gene syndrome: localization of the genes involved in the Langer-Giedion syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. Jan 1995;4(1):31-6. [Medline].

  31. Wu YQ, Heutink P, de Vries BB. Assignment of a second locus for multiple exostoses to the pericentromeric region of chromosome 11. Hum Mol Genet. Jan 1994;3(1):167-71. [Medline].

  32. Wise CA, Clines GA, Massa H. Identification and localization of the gene for EXTL, a third member of the multiple exostoses gene family. Genome Res. Jan 1997;7(1):10-6. [Medline].

  33. Kitagawa H, Shimakawa H, Sugahara K. The tumor suppressor EXT-like gene EXTL2 encodes an alpha1, 4-N-acetylhexosaminyltransferase that transfers N-acetylgalactosamine and N-acetylglucosamine to the common glycosaminoglycan-protein linkage region. The key enzyme for the chain initiation of heparan sulfate. J Biol Chem. May 14 1999;274(20):13933-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  34. Van Hul W, Wuyts W, Hendrickx J. Identification of a third EXT-like gene (EXTL3) belonging to the EXT gene family. Genomics. Jan 15 1998;47(2):230-7. [Medline].

  35. Wuyts W, Van Hul W, Hendrickx J, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel member of the EXT gene family, EXTL2. Eur J Hum Genet. Nov-Dec 1997;5(6):382-9. [Medline].

  36. Wuyts W, Di Gennaro G, Bianco F. Molecular and clinical examination of an Italian DEFECT11 family. Eur J Hum Genet. Jul 1999;7(5):579-84. [Medline].

  37. Florez B, Mönckeberg J, Castillo G, et al. Solitary osteochondroma long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. Mar 2008;17(2):91-4. [Medline].

  38. Castells L, Comas P, Gonzalez A, et al. Case report: haemothorax in hereditary multiple exostosis. Br J Radiol. Mar 1993;66(783):269-70. [Medline].

  39. Uchida K, Kurihara Y, Sekiguchi S. Spontaneous haemothorax caused by costal exostosis. Eur Respir J. Mar 1997;10(3):735-6. [Medline].

  40. Taniguchi K. A practical classification system for multiple cartilaginous exostosis in children. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1995;15(5):585-91. [Medline].

  41. Leube B, Hardt K, Portier S, et al. Ulna/height ratio as clinical parameter separating EXT1 from EXT2 families?. Genet Test. Mar 2008;12(1):129-33. [Medline].

  42. Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Kojima H, et al. Lower limb ischaemia caused by fractured osteochondroma of the femur. Br J Radiol. Apr 2007;80(952):e78-80. [Medline].

  43. Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, et al. FDG-PET in differential diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Jul-Aug 1999;23(4):603-8. [Medline].

  44. Abramovici L, Steiner GC. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora''s lesion): a retrospective study of 12 cases, 2 arising in long bones. Hum Pathol. Dec 2002;33(12):1205-10. [Medline].

  45. Harty JA, Kelly P, Niall D, et al. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora's lesion) of the sesamoid: a case report. Foot Ankle Int. May 2000;21(5):408-12. [Medline].

  46. De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, Ramon F. Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: is it useful or necessary?. Skeletal Radiol. Feb 1996;25(2):137-41. [Medline].

  47. Malghem J, Vande Berg B, Noel H, et al. Benign osteochondromas and exostotic chondrosarcomas: evaluation of cartilage cap thickness by ultrasound. Skeletal Radiol. 1992;21(1):33-7. [Medline].

  48. Hendel HW, Daugaard S, Kjaer A. Utility of planar bone scintigraphy to distinguish benign osteochondromas from malignant chondrosarcomas. Clin Nucl Med. Sep 2002;27(9):622-4. [Medline].

  49. Azouz EM. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign bone lesions: cysts and tumors. Top Magn Reson Imaging. Aug 2002;13(4):219-29. [Medline].

  50. Bessel-Hagen F. Deformity of the forearm. Arch Klin Chir. 1891;42:42-466.

  51. Black B, Dooley J, Pyper A, et al. Multiple hereditary exostoses. An epidemiologic study of an isolated community in Manitoba. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 1993;212-7. [Medline].

  52. Bloch AM, Nevo Y, Ben-Sira L, et al. Winging of the scapula in a child with hereditary multiple exostoses. Pediatr Neurol. Jan 2002;26(1):74-6. [Medline].

  53. Bovée JV, Hogendoorn PC. Re. Review article entitled 'The neoplastic pathogenesis of solitary and multiple osteochondromas'. J Pathol. Mar 2000;190(4):516-7. [Medline].

  54. Cardelia JM, Dormans JP, Drummond DS, et al. Proximal fibular osteochondroma with associated peroneal nerve palsy: a review of six cases. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1995;15(5):574-7. [Medline].

  55. Cates HE, Burgess RC. Incidence of brachydactyly and hand exostosis in hereditary multiple exostosis. J Hand Surg [Am]. Jan 1991;16(1):127-32. [Medline].

  56. Cho KH, Park BH, Yeon KM. Ultrasound of the adult hip. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. Jun 2000;21(3):214-30. [Medline].

  57. Cirak B, Karabulut N, Palaoglu S. Cervical osteochondroma as a cause of spinal cord compression in a patient with hereditary multiple exostoses: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Australas Radiol. Sep 2002;46(3):309-11. [Medline].

  58. Cook A, Raskind W, Blanton SH, et al. Genetic heterogeneity in families with hereditary multiple exostoses. Am J Hum Genet. Jul 1993;53(1):71-9. [Medline].

  59. Copeland RL, Meehan PL, Morrissy RT. Spontaneous regression of osteochondromas. Two case reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1985;67(6):971-3. [Medline].

  60. Davidson MB. Status of research funded by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes. Aug 2000;49(8):1394. [Medline][Full Text].

  61. Eder HG, Oberbauer RW, Ranner G. Cervical cord compression in hereditary multiple exostoses. J Neurosurg Sci. Mar 1993;37(1):53-6. [Medline].

  62. Ehrenfried A. Multiple cartilaginous exostoses--hereditary deforming chorodysplasia: a brief report on a little known disease. JAMA. 1915;64:1642-6.

  63. Ergun R, Okten AI, Beskonakli E, et al. Cervical laminar exostosis in multiple hereditary osteochondromatosis: anterior stabilization and fusion technique for preventing instability. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(4):267-9. [Medline].

  64. Fairbank HA. Diaphyseal aclasis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1949;31(B):105-13.

  65. Felix NA, Mazur JM, Loveless EA. Acetabular dysplasia associated with hereditary multiple exostoses. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 2000;82(4):555-7. [Medline].

  66. Fogel GR, McElfresh EC, Peterson HA. Management of deformities of the forearm in multiple hereditary osteochondromas. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1984;66(5):670-80. [Medline].

  67. Garrison RC, Unni KK, McLeod RA, et al. Chondrosarcoma arising in osteochondroma. Cancer. May 1 1982;49(9):1890-7. [Medline].

  68. Glock Y, Nehme I, Delisle MB. Acute ischemia of a limb as a complication of multiple hereditary exostoses. Case report and literature review. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). Feb 2000;41(1):105-8. [Medline].

  69. Golfieri R, Baddeley H, Pringle JS. Primary bone tumors. MR morphologic appearance correlated with pathologic examinations. Acta Radiol. Jul 1991;32(4):290-8. [Medline].

  70. Gordon SL, Buchanan JR, Ladda RL. Hereditary multiple exostoses: report of a kindred. J Med Genet. Dec 1981;18(6):428-30. [Medline][Full Text].

  71. Griffiths HJ, Thompson RC Jr, Galloway HR. Bursitis in association with solitary osteochondromas presenting as mass lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 1991;20(7):513-6. [Medline].

  72. Hennekam RC. Hereditary multiple exostoses. J Med Genet. Apr 1991;28(4):262-6. [Medline].

  73. Jahss MH, Olives R. The foot and ankle in multiple hereditary exostoses. Foot Ankle. Nov 1980;1(3):128-42. [Medline].

  74. Kolar J, Matejovsky Z, Zidkova H, et al. Malignization of diaphyseal aclasis. Diagn Imaging. 1983;52(1):1-9. [Medline].

  75. Krooth RS, Macklin MT, Hilbish TF. Diaphyseal aclasis (multiple exostosis) on Guam. Am J Hum Genet. 1961;13:340-7.

  76. Langer LO Jr, Krassikoff N, Laxova R. The tricho-rhino-phalangeal syndrome with exostoses (or Langer-Giedion syndrome): four additional patients without mental retardation and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. Sep 1984;19(1):81-112. [Medline].

  77. Levin KH, Wilbourn AJ, Jones HR Jr. Childhood peroneal neuropathy from bone tumors. Pediatr Neurol. Jul-Aug 1991;7(4):308-9. [Medline].

  78. McCornack EB. The surgical management of hereditary multiple exostosis. Ortho Rev. 1981;5:57-63.

  79. Mermer MJ, Gupta MC, Salamon PB, et al. Thoracic vertebral body exostosis as a cause of myelopathy in a patient with hereditary multiple exostoses. J Spinal Disord Tech. Apr 2002;15(2):144-8. [Medline].

  80. Meyer CA, White CS. Cartilaginous disorders of the chest. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 1998;18(5):1109-23; quiz 1241-2. [Medline].

  81. Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, et al. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 2000;20(5):1407-34. [Medline][Full Text].

  82. Nawata K, Teshima R, Minamizaki T, et al. Knee deformities in multiple hereditary exostoses. A longitudinal radiographic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Apr 1995;194-9. [Medline].

  83. Ochsner PE. [Multiple cartilaginous exostoses and neoplastic degeneration: review of the literature (author's transl)]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1978;116(3):369-78. [Medline].

  84. Oviedo A, Simmons T, Benya E. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol. Sep-Oct 2001;4(5):496-500. [Medline].

  85. Paik NJ, Han TR, Lim SJ. Multiple peripheral nerve compressions related to malignantly transformed hereditary multiple exostoses. Muscle Nerve. Aug 2000;23(8):1290-4. [Medline].

  86. Peterson HA. Multiple hereditary osteochondromata. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 1989;222-30. [Medline].

  87. Pierz KA, Stieber JR, Kusumi K, et al. Hereditary multiple exostoses: one center's experience and review of etiology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Aug 2002;49-59. [Medline].

  88. Porter DE, Benson MK, Hosney GA. The hip in hereditary multiple exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Sep 2001;83(7):988-95. [Medline].

  89. Quirini GE, Meyer JR, Herman M. Osteochondroma of the thoracic spine: an unusual cause of spinal cord compression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. May 1996;17(5):961-4. [Medline][Full Text].

  90. Raskind WH, Conrad EU, Chansky H. Loss of heterozygosity in chondrosarcomas for markers linked to hereditary multiple exostoses loci on chromosomes 8 and 11. Am J Hum Genet. May 1995;56(5):1132-9. [Medline].

  91. Sakai D, Mochida J, Toh E. Spinal osteochondromas in middle-aged to elderly patients. Spine. Dec 1 2002;27(23):E503-6. [Medline].

  92. Schmale GA, Conrad EU 3rd, Raskind WH. The natural history of hereditary multiple exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1994;76(7):986-92. [Medline].

  93. Shapiro F, Simon S, Glimcher MJ. Hereditary multiple exostoses. Anthropometric, roentgenographic, and clinical aspects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 1979;61(6A):815-24. [Medline].

  94. Shapiro SA, Javid T, Putty T. Osteochondroma with cervical cord compression in hereditary multiple exostoses. Spine. Jun 1990;15(6):600-2. [Medline].

  95. Sharma MC, Arora R, Deol PS. Osteochondroma of the spine: an enigmatic tumor of the spinal cord. A series of 10 cases. J Neurosurg Sci. Jun 2002;46(2):66-70; discussion 70. [Medline].

  96. Shin HT, Chang MW. Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome, type II (Langer-Giedion syndrome). Dermatol Online J. Dec 2001;7(2):8. [Medline].

  97. Silber JS, Mathur S, Ecker M. A solitary osteochondroma of the pediatric thoracic spine: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Orthop. Sep 2000;29(9):711-4. [Medline].

  98. Snearly WN, Peterson HA. Management of ankle deformities in multiple hereditary osteochondromata. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 1989;9(4):427-32. [Medline].

  99. Solomon L. Bone growth in diaphysial aclasis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1961;43-B:700-16.

  100. Solomon L. Carpal and tarsal exostosis in hereditary multiple exostoses. Clin Radiol. Oct 1967;18(4):412-6. [Medline].

  101. Solomon L. Chondrosarcoma in hereditary multiple exostosis. S Afr Med J. Apr 6 1974;48(16):671-6. [Medline].

  102. Solomon L. Hereditary multiple exostosis. Am J Hum Genet. Sep 1964;16:351-63. [Medline][Full Text].

  103. Solomon L. Hereditary multiple exostosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1963;45-B:292-304.

  104. Song KS. Spontaneous regression of osteochondromatosis of the radius after lengthening of the ulna: a case report. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 2000;20(5):689-91. [Medline].

  105. Spatz DK, Guille JT, Kumar SJ. Distal tibiofibular diastasis secondary to osteochondroma in a child. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Dec 1997;195-7. [Medline].

  106. Stanton RP, Hansen MO. Function of the upper extremities in hereditary multiple exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1996;78(4):568-73. [Medline].

  107. Tani A, Tsuchimochi S, Nakabeppu Y. Bone and Tl-201 scintigraphy in a case of hereditary multiple exostoses. Clin Nucl Med. Dec 2001;26(12):1028-31. [Medline].

  108. Trevor D. Tarso-epiphysial aclasis: a congenital error of epiphysial development. J Bone Joint Surg. 1950;32-B:204-13.

  109. Uri DS, Dalinka MK, Kneeland JB. Muscle impingement: MR imaging of a painful complication of osteochondromas. Skeletal Radiol. Oct 1996;25(7):689-92. [Medline].

  110. Vallance R, Hamblen DL, Kelly IG. Vascular complications of osteochondroma. Clin Radiol. Nov 1985;36(6):639-42. [Medline].

  111. Vasseur MA, Fabre O. Vascular complications of osteochondromas. J Vasc Surg. Mar 2000;31(3):532-8. [Medline].

  112. Virchow R. Ueber th Entstenhung des Enchondroms und seine Besihungen zur Enchondrosis und Exostosis cartilaginea. Manatsberichte der Koniglichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenshaften. 1876:760.

  113. Voutsinas S, Wynne-Davies R. The infrequency of malignant disease in diaphyseal aclasis and neurofibromatosis. J Med Genet. Oct 1983;20(5):345-9. [Medline][Full Text].

  114. Weiner DS, Hoyt WA Jr. The development of the upper end of the femur in multiple hereditary exostosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Nov-Dec 1978;187-90. [Medline].

  115. Wicklund CL, Pauli RM, Johnston D. Natural history study of hereditary multiple exostoses. Am J Med Genet. Jan 2 1995;55(1):43-6. [Medline].

  116. Woertler K, Lindner N, Gosheger G. Osteochondroma: MR imaging of tumor-related complications. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(5):832-40. [Medline].

Keywords

osteochondroma, osteochondromatosis, hereditary multiple exostoses, HME, multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses, diaphyseal achalasia, diaphysial achalasia, multiple hereditary osteochondromata, multiple congenital osteochondromata, diaphyseal aclasis, diaphysial aclasis, chondral osteogenic dysplasia of direction, chondral osteoma, deforming chondrodysplasia, dyschondroplasia exostosing disease, exostotic dysplasia, multiple osteomatoses osteogenic disease, familial bony spurs, metaphyseal spurs, multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica, Trevor disease, Trevor's disease

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP, Chairman of Medical Imaging, Professor of Radiology, NGHA, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Ali Nawaz Khan, MBBS, FRCS, FRCP, FRCR, LRCP is a member of the following medical societies: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of the United States, Royal College of Radiologists, and Royal College of Surgeons of England
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Mohammed Jassim Al-Salman, MBBS, Consulting Radiologist, King Abdul Aziz Medical City, National Guard Hospital
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR, Lecturer, Sheffield University Medical School; Endovascular Fellow, Sheffield Vascular Institute
Sumaira MacDonald, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians, and Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Michael A Bruno, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine; Director, Radiology Quality Management Services, Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine
Michael A Bruno, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America, Society of Nuclear Medicine, and Society of Skeletal Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Theodore E Keats, MD, Professor, Departments of Radiology and Orthopedics, University of Virginia School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM, Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.